tv [untitled] April 21, 2022 7:00pm-7:31pm MSK
7:00 pm
another country, i'm sorry for my mistake. here, listen. well, listen to this. this is some kind of wedding in malinovka, can you imagine we gave you planes. no, you didn't give us salt. well, we kind of gave the planes. well, it’s not that there are absolutely planes - it’s like going more. yes, well, listen. well, it's starting to come out. yes, this is very artyom, what is it? well, look, uh, so the red line that both they and we are talking about yes, no one wants a direct conflict between russia and nato with an understandable escalation of non-conventional types of weapons, so let's say in diplomatic language, but no one wants, but we see that there are planes. yes? no, we do not see zero and ukrainians. we see that there is talk of zero can not become doubled. more. we see that heavy weapons, tanks, artillery, are being delivered. we see that american satellites give instructions to the target also in this diplomatic language. well, for large targets in a naval war, yes,
7:01 pm
very diplomatic, but understandable enough for everyone, does an american three-star general mean, otherwise a four-star is sitting in mariupoleon was announced a month ago, but the name was announced, but we have not seen him yet. we did not see him, does this mean that the united states is not at war with russia and does this mean that russia should not answer to the regiment. azov as an enemy and not zelensky, but the united states. i like the way your way of thinking is said, but i can only object to you, but for the sake of truth, one cannot raise the question of whether the united states is at war with russia because russia is not at war with ukraine, not ukraine is not at war with russia therefore, any supply of weapons, any alliances. in any case, they cannot be regarded from the point of view of waging war, because formally no one is at war. with no one leads, then all for the world. what questions?
7:02 pm
but still, these are the nuances in conversations about weapons. after all, why am i still paying attention to this somewhere inside me, by the way, about these howitzers that fly on some kind of planes and about these tanks, which at the output turned out to be some kind of then light armored transporters or obsolete t-72 scrap metal, which, of course, also drives and shoots. i have a feeling more and more, and this is not some kind of here. well, such a hmm screen, yes, than uh? remember the film the man from the boulevard des capucines, when one of the characters said about america, this country will love corruption. so i think that, just like in afghanistan , billions of dollars are being laundered, supposedly something is being supplied, but in fact, everyone, uh, perfectly understands that nothing is being supplied there. really stays on paper girls in the pocket in the right can and moreover, here is the most disgusting part of this weapon for those who have not joined the sanctions. he's going to the middle east
7:03 pm
to destabilize in order to, uh, stir up a conflict there, so that the americans get that very cheap oil and gas, and we should now think about security. not uh, not only in our country, but also in our custody partners. a plus. in fact, it is clear, that is, you confirm my very accurate assumption. it seems that in this whole story of supply, supply, supply, supply, supply. let me tell you, as a financier, too, such some kind of financial bubbles are seen more than, of course, afghanistan yes, a trillion dollars was laundered. there , 62 billion dollars were spent to protect the pre-dispersers from these artisanal mines, a mantrumpet with nails and explosives. this is more than twice the military budget. how can it be real? how are you destroying now? eh, the world of some of our compatriots - true, they are all already, of course, who is in israel who is in georgia and who, where are those compatriots in the world of which this is impossible in the usa. what is it, is it possible?
7:04 pm
perhaps people came here because the curds did not rise in price turn on the tv, and they are told such corruption in the usa, if you, if you were here, yes, about the table and uh, here. here oleg, after all, you can immediately see they were studying. you and i are on the same course. here, after all, what the dog rummaged through, as our leader one biden said, is not like that. i am now speaking quite seriously, without irony, i treat him, so to speak, biden is not such a question, because he has already been filmed again with the biden language is not like that, because he is no more. but in the light of the fact that he is no longer next to him, it is possible, and now i will demonstrate this to you, how there are those who, perhaps, use the fact that he is no more. and there is something wow attributed to the war. here, imagine. we were just discussing that in the morning he was talking about mariupol something like that, so he said, i just can’t tell him in the morning mariupol well,
7:05 pm
there it went there at 5 o’clock in the summer, so, well, and there 8 39 years old. imagine an elderly man wakes up, they tell him, there sir, there he is mariupol doesn’t understand anything, but nods, mariupol, and then they push him some more paper and say, well, from mariupol we will now control everything. you, most importantly, sign, and he signs, and he signs, and he signs nothing. here's what he says about it later. what did he sign. listen. last week, i signed an $800 million assistance package to ukraine, including artillery systems and armored personnel carriers, but the equipment that ukrainians need now in the context of the intensification of hostilities in donbass there is a different relief, there is flat terrain. they need other weapons. i'm announcing another $800 million in aid. this is a heavy artillery weapon. centurion howitzers hundreds of thousands of ammunition for them. there are many tactical drones out there. last 2 months. we are at a record
7:06 pm
pace. we are delivering weapons to ukraine thousands of drones, grenade launchers, radar systems and other systems 15 million ammunition the united states delivered 10 anti-tank systems to each russian tank, and we continue to share with ukraine divorced information to help them defend against russian aggression about dawn information is true anti-tank grenade launchers. i think that is true, although many of them are already being mastered by the fighters of the dpr of the lpr. but this one, you see, last week, i signed 800 million. and now i once again signed for 800 million. and now i signed 4 billion, that i remember that there is someone in his entourage. who gave him 200 bucks, because there was a story that one of his 200 bucks hit him? and who said that these same people think, listen, but he does not remember that he signed there for 800 million the previous day. let's go beach. and yet, it means that these are signed for him and he is also dragging these to the germans. but
7:07 pm
it's like that, yes, and then, uh, how would they all think, listen, well, listen, if here he looks at the rabbit and does not understand this. he alone sees this rabbit or everyone around him also sees this rabbit. i wouldn't be surprised if he starts signing something like a billion every week now. and here comes the most important question. what if the version of that is there too craftsmen saw this artistically with a jigsaw, then how large can the scale of this be? look at me in this regard. i hope that it will really destroy america, corruption is included in our domestic classic film, but at the same time, the weapons that are supplied to ukraine are supplied in parallel with specialists who train ukrainians in five centers in poland. ah, to use these heavy weapons and these centers work in parallel, and those deliveries that took place
7:08 pm
even before the announcement of this assistance. they are happening. they really go through the area. poland somehow find themselves going through. that's just what it is. i have a party here, ours just announced that, uh, uh, the ministry of foreign affairs. this time, she stated directly by the representative of the united states that the us-nato transports with weapons following the ukrainian territory the armed forces of the russian federation have the right to consider as legitimate military targets, and the director of the north america department, gremit koshelev, we were all waiting for this statement month. so they say, after the statement. well, look , we have been saying this for a month, but still, but the active destruction of the same railway infrastructure. here in such an active phase began something quite recently. literally just now, the day before in zaporizhia, that very notorious bridge across the dnieper was blown up, knowing full well that those very deliveries were declared heavy weapons. there, uh, the artillery may
7:09 pm
well somehow end up with the grouping, which is now located exactly where the kramator, slavyansk, and so on. if you speak in in general, yes, of course, the americans are sawing, they are sawing the military budget, the military budget is more than eight hundred billion dollars. yes, they will, on the one hand, play a pr company, that you see, we supply so much. we even supply what the ukrainians themselves may not want, but only some part will reach. it doesn't matter. this means that the idea of dragging out this conflict is beneficial, including not only their politicians. for those who, but he himself is important, see the precedent. i just want to explain. uh, with these biden statements, he uh way back to a certain rollback. he destroys it the same way. well, suddenly the americans started talking. yes, you know, i think already. well , of course we support you, well, all the way to roll back
7:10 pm
yourself. no, i'm talking about something else, that if they announced such military assistance, and did not announce this support, moreover, the americans and europeans force them to give more weapons and you say they do it, respectively. if there really are some grandiose scale, these cuts, kickbacks, and so on, then biden himself is already the most unpopular current president of the united states of america . look at his rating. he really is. in my opinion. oh, god forbid, of course, he has health, but he simply won’t live his term, because what will happen to him from the point of view. again, this information company, how he promoted help to ukraine here, this will destroy him, completely destroy his administration. but the fact that we finally began to consider them, uh, deliveries, sort of, like uh, the military goals were announced for two rounds. well , in my opinion, too, a very connoisseur. i really hope piece of iron. we will see just in terms of infrastructure. which you are there in the west, with the help of
7:11 pm
which they bombed the entire war. actually a statement that their transports with weapons are legitimate military targets. this is not yet a statement that we will bomb the piece of iron. how are they different? well , let's clarify the first mot weapon that was not supplied before, it was supplied not so much by piece of iron, because all these anti-tank systems were all that they supplied before. it was much easier to transport, by the way, here i'll add to what you're saying, just now e kirby said that they carry howitzers on planes, but still they can't howitzers on planes. they unload everything to remove, yes, so, of course, they will be hunted, but i wanted to return to the plane. you know, there is one more nuance here, which, well, it’s worth saying the problem is that there’s nowhere to take weapons especially when it’s our kind. the forester promised that we gave airplanes to everyone involved in aviation , and a question arose. where did you get it? yes? that there is where e f-16 f-15. you didn’t give ukraine or it doesn’t know how to fly them, but there are no more soviet ones. there are so many of them that no one will give them away,
7:12 pm
or they simply do not exist and are now arising. the same story with europe, what, uh, they raked it out? there’s already a lot, you know, we don’t need to save something ourselves in case there’s nothing special to fight with and europe was shrinking, shrinking to shrinking to such a state that when suddenly there was a conversation about selling us old leopard tanks, it turned out that those who are old to you sold a long time ago. they are already there, wherever they just do not go. for which countries, and those that remain there are 200-something new pieces. they only know for themselves that they are wild for sebs, they will have it in ukraine, and now the question arises that the only supplier of weapons is really real, this is america, but again, in order to supply it, you need to, firstly, somehow deliver people somehow . and most importantly, dozens of units are not something with which you can win, and there is a strong feeling that yes. ukraine is turning into a magnificent black hole where you can write everything off. well, how, again, how is afghanistan in the last there? well, yes, but at the same time, in fact,
7:13 pm
about these very, e, arms supplies , serious passions arise, just those e european countries, because as i understand it, in germany, the whole thing is already balancing at the level , no matter how funny it sounds, well, at the level of such an almost internal political crisis, because scholz. well, there were still military people there, that is. here, first look what happened, and with the fact that some want to supply heavy weapons to ukraine, while others do not really want to, listen. the german ministry of defense has reduced at least two times the list of export weapons for ukraine, which was previously prepared by representatives of the country's military-industrial complex, based on requests. kyiv in march ukraine reported a specific need for heavy weapons in several rocket launchers and anti-ship missiles, as well as
7:14 pm
anti-tank missiles, as early as mid-march, almost all the weapons required by ukraine were on the list, then scholz's office took out a red pencil. as a result, the list originally presented by the ukrainian side was reduced from 48 to 24 pages of 15 types of weapons, and the deliveries of which kiev requested, only three positions remained in the final document, including an indication of possible alternatives. and now, now look, that is, we see from this that someone, apparently, wants someone for some reason does not want, perhaps somehow says that in general, they themselves don’t have any left or or what some other considerations and then it all goes on. well, in a regime, as i said, almost a domestic political crisis. now we listen to hairpins. at present, the debate on the need to supply heavy weapons to kiev has intensified in germany. the opposition conservative bloc, the christian democratic and christian social unions
7:15 pm
, led by leader friedrich moers, plans to submit a resolution to the bundestag next week, allowing the supply of heavy weapons to ukraine, if schultz will not make such a decision the majority, including the ruling coalition, are in favor of supplying weapons to kiev; if scholz continues to be against the supply of heavy weapons, his position will become so precarious that the question of confidence in schultz as head of government may arise in the bundestag. that is, this weapon has not yet reached where. and it is already beginning, what is called, more accurately, continues to destroy germany, not only economically, but politically, how do you explain this. this is, well, on the one hand, if the germans are germans, they are often one a bag of cups can brew a certain ska here. it is quite understandable, that is, when out of forty-eight pages it becomes 24, then, well, this is also about the issue of a tough economy. but this is their weapon, really already. well, as if there is nothing
7:16 pm
to give, or they have something to give, but for one reason or another, by the way, the military, including, in general, do not want to get involved. well, this is the most important question. this is roughly speaking, a warehouse or a political issue , this is, of course, a political issue in germany , the most sensible heads understand that the more stretches. the longer the crisis drags on. e in ukraine , the worse for europe and the worse for germany itself, its economy, first of all, but the desire to bend, even to the detriment. e interest of the country under the dictates of pressure from washington, it has certain politicians and scholz, despite the fact that he clearly caves in. he is not yet one of the most such gigs; there are more flexible policies. who are ready to bend more for the sake of the trans-atlantic and their uh career political interests, but let's remember our account, which was said by the one who did what the reptile worm has the right to
7:17 pm
complain to be crushed later. well, i never forgot these words of kant, the main thing is whether scholz knows them. i think he owes him, we will remind him the most amazing thing, that not only will we remind him, the british are here and it’s already coming out, this conflict is getting to the level, you are already talking, and the americans are putting pressure on them. now the question is, who is it now? who is under pressure here, the british put pressure on him so much that you won’t show a little. to be honest, i was generally surprised, because it is already reaching some level that i could not imagine and you could imagine, and i'll tell you, which one right after the ad, so don't switch. watch the premiere of the serial film after the program, the time when the nerves are at the limit need magnelis b6 is magnesium fortified with vitamin b6 magnelis b6 is up to 30% more affordable than a similar imported drug. we are investing in the
7:18 pm
7:19 pm
7:20 pm
goat? i will no longer leave you from a wife who does not love a child, if it turns out that the father is a meritorious, and even a married official. look, all the series on the movie one tv represents from your personal well-being vanity , irritation, excessive modesty can only prevent you from thinking about something good now. and what are you saying to me? not to her are you fighting? yes, how are you? and i'll paint.
7:21 pm
love to sing sincerely at moments of warm friendly meetings and home holidays. the first channel opens the acceptance of applications for participation in the all-russian drinking songs competition. go to the site, fill out an application and get a chance to win 3 million rubles. the time will show program continues to work live, we have many times, uh, from different angles, discussing a special military operation , we have said many times that in fact this is a conflict of such a level that it is, perhaps, not only and not so much in ukraine and maybe even strange as it may seem to you, maybe even not only and not so much in russia as such, but in these contradictions that have matured between everyone everywhere and, oddly enough, it will seem
7:22 pm
, among other things, between nato members. here we talked about what exists. here is a difficult situation with the fact that the germans either supply weapons, or do not supply scholz weapons, they do not want to stop being a worm to the end. and it seems like the military is also resisting, or they can take some something and then all of a sudden. who do you think is coming down on germany therefore about? brits, who else are we listening, if germany does not stop buying russian gas, then let it also face sanctions anyone who buys german goods right now is actually financing putin 's war, if the germans do not want to make sacrifices, this is their problem is undoubtedly close the moment for the introduction of restrictive measures against berlin although germany is one of the most powerful economies in the world. we will be able to replace it with the goods of a car, we will import chemicals from france and japan from south korea or the usa. i read this article to the end and kept waiting for what would now be written there, we, uh, tear it up. uh, the german
7:23 pm
economy is in tatters, well, it hasn't come to that yet. here you speak americans on them. well, it seems to me that this is quite an indicator that when i read this and thought, i wonder, but now it will come to the germans that all this distribution with ukraine is with this conflict. it was, perhaps, invented not even to create problems for us, so that ger they create problems with brityshas. you always follow the wake of washington although sometimes following in this in adler they overtake the boss a little, but this is only ingenuity, nothing more , if, uh, when trends change in the usa, then the uk corrects its behavior. but this is a kind of continuation of brexit in my opinion. that is, these are economically e conflicts that are already breaking out, including in the western camp of the economic situation, which has been deteriorating for a long time and is deteriorating not because of the events
7:24 pm
in ukraine and here there is not enough for everyone. e, and therefore, cynically requires victims from germany. but this is what is on the surface, but in fact there is a very tough fight in this trade economic dispute and britain sometimes does not even hide that it does not want to see a strong german economy in fact . this is where the question arises, is this still journalistic rhetoric, or is it, uh, a zategraph broadcasting a certain idea, that is, we can imagine some kind of pressure. uh, let's just say the political sanctions on germany by the allies, according to nato, should look here, these are, as it were, what is smart. well, what can a fool have in the language. this is in this case, saying a divider, but in fact , here we remembered, we must remember the concept that existed before that britain left the eu, in any case, it is now a competitor, so hitting a competitor,
7:25 pm
for any reason, it is very good, but smack on a competitor's locomotive. this is even better, because when a blow to germany is always a blow to everything and because germany is an assembly machine, germany's resources flow there, they are converted into a state of goods, and in this case any even not sanctions. but even when you call for public sanctions, don’t buy german, this is a blow, first of all throughout the eu, you understand from italy france airbus you understand what, that is, german french or whose conversation is actually about what i understand, a question, do the germans understand, and if they understand, how much time do they have left for this understanding, if they understand, remember how many times we discussed these ideas of george friedman in this program. eh, this is the very middle of the sea, yes, this one is actually in fact, a barrier between the baltic and the black sea, which i lined up. how many times have we
7:26 pm
shown this map, but this one, this is all between the sea, which will cut off germany from russia and that's it. it. strictly speaking, for the sake of this and e happened precisely yes, that's about just between the sea. i’m just talking about who and why is helping ukraine and what global goals i want to remind you that only in the summer of 2021. we discussed with you in this studio how the british got together. uh, actually monopolize the waters of the black sea, well, thanks to what they will build, there together with the ukrainians. the so-called bases of the british royal navy went there now, if you look closely at the map. i'm not even talking about what will happen when the special, military operation ends, our control over the zaporozhye region over the kherson region. this is such a reality that this project, between the seas, simply destroys it in the bud. and i 'm not talking about what else is there, nikolaev is still there, odessa yes, even what is already there here is kherson and zaporozhye, this radically changes
7:27 pm
the whole concept of the british, who, as we remember, only in the summer were actually going to become the main ones, looking after ukraine, and that’s what vladislav was talking about, the second moment is economic, and when there were tough brexit negotiations, upon the british exit, it was the germans who insisted that the british should pay. and if they do not pay, then there will be a hard exit, respectively, the british. in this case, they test. they lost at the geo-economic level and at the geopolitical level they lost, because again we will repeat our control. here are these southern regions. again , i don't want to guess. i am not a vanga, but i am sure that no one from kherson will leave zaporozhye, that this territory in any status does not matter what status it will be. it will not be controlled by ukraine, and this blows up this plan between the sea and the entire british, in fact, policy aimed at this to stone. but then look, what if we say this, and we say this and we understand, remembering this card, that the goal was not only about ukraine and the goal was to
7:28 pm
build this cordon against germany once again to prevent german industry from uniting with russian resources, then it turns out that the battle for ukraine at first it is, well, relatively speaking, a battle in general for the fate of germany and german industry and whoever because, if you said it right. well, you say there, kherson zaporizhzhya but if you look cut off yes, but they are cut off, but you understand that then it must inevitably be. so, of course, and then for them it's already inevitable opposition to this is we ask. why are they here all the time here they are building up and building up and building up. well, because it ’s not zelensky at stake. they don’t have any zelensky at all on the eve of their game. this is a huge scheme of how the world will work and what role it will play. they will play in it, right? well , really here. well, i don't know if it's appropriate to remember? yes, the ideas of uh, uh continental alliances, yes, uh russian-german, yes, that is, but in
7:29 pm
pre-revolutionary times. that is, e, as it were, a pledge peace in europe this is peace and cooperation between russia and germany, of course, which is controversial for the twentieth century. eh, it could have been given to some crown, but nevertheless, they remembered this phrase. is it possible to restore this phrase to this meaning? now, in my opinion, unfortunately, no, because here you asked, yes, and the germans, when to wake up, because don’t buy german, i’ll only be happy if all, uh, all of europe stops buying, german, it’s very good, then they will understand, but it will be too late, because everything it is a self-priming funnel. here, i'm a culture of abolition, yes, i'm right, only the liberal sector, so to speak. yes, this was used in america by biden against trump. yes, it was used in the first macron elections in france, yes. uh, it was kind of used in brexit. yes, only i am right. well
7:30 pm
, of course, a step aside. uh, step left step right. you've been a respectable journalist all along. you are nobody , you were a teacher. the university wrote books. you were nobody , you were in the workshop of europe and you needed this cheap gas, but now you have been put in situation where you can't. and now you are in putin's blood, or like putin yes, because there , when we showed this esoteric. this is the poster she is holding. uh, it's like hey germans, how much do you save there on one liter of blood? well, that’s all, that’s all. and right here this question arises about a self-sucking funnel, because the germans, of course, are now being sucked into this funnel, but they themselves are being sucked in there, because this is the dispute about the rejection of our energy sources. eh, well, there, of course, there is a conversation going on. it’s about oil, about coal, but it’s clear that gas is behind all this brackets. and here they are, here you are, please, anna lena berkova, who says that we refuse.
9 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on