well, force on taiwan if the united states brings it to this a and will the united states stop in its attempts to ignite the taiwan conflict? well, as you know, a kind word is good. kind word, with a gun it is more intelligible in this regard, economic and financial success. china is converted into a real rise in chinese military power today. the people's republic of china is not only a first-class economic power, but also a first-class military power . people's liberation army of china today capable of conducting combat operations in all environments, including the cyber ​​environment, and in this regard, of course, the chinese general staff are chinese. the military who are planning various scenarios of military operations are actually developing, among other things, a military mechanism for solving the taiwan problem; we see a fierce confrontation today between

the fleets of china and the united states of america ; suffocation of china well and, of course, for china it is critically important in this situation. including developing partnerships in the military sphere with the russian federation , i would note that we had very very successful studies in the field and consultations at the strategic planning level, there were joint air patrols that were carried out by strategic bombers of russia and the people's republic of china, by the way , this caused a lot, i would say a lot of concern, uh, for a number of asia-pacific satellites in

united states of america in this regard. i think that the really harsh rhetoric that both the leader of china and the leaders of the chinese ministry of defense are demonstrating is aimed at upholding national interests. beijing in this regard. china will act absolutely, pragmatically, but it is also important, of course, to note that the chinese leadership is well aware that after russia, china will be the next target, therefore russia's support in the diplomatic military. the trade economic field meets, first of all, the interests of china itself, which they are well aware that the global confrontation in ukraine depends, among other things, not only on the fate of russia around the world. well, the people's republic of china itself in this regard. this consistently clear, tough, resolute rhetoric, which the first persons of the chinese military-political leadership speaks , indicates that china intends not to

integrate into the sanctions mechanisms and intends to carefully consistently, nevertheless, support russia and build new architecture of the world order completely with you i agree, a and b china are well aware that if the united states succeeds in weakening russia so much that it loses the status of a great power, then china will remain in geopolitical loneliness and, uh, for it. uh, this is a nightmare situation from all points of view and even from geo-economic, because russia for china is actually a supplier of energy resources and a doomsday route. and if russia ceases to be such, then even the economic development of china will be under a very big question and another very important asian, great power, which does not join the anti-russian sanctions, but which occupies an independent position. this is india ah, the united states also tried to force india uh, to condemn russia to refuse cooperation with russia, the effect turned out to be the opposite . india is only expanding cooperation with russia both

in the field of military-technical cooperation and in the field of the economy. here today, uh, with uh, a two-day visit to india went next sar from the collective west uh, british prime minister boris johnson a and his upcoming negotiations with the prime minister of india a on rendering fashion, but here's what's interesting, and today the times of india wrote with reference to members of the british cabinet of ministers well, of course, an unnamed official, that johnson, unlike biden, is not going to read annotations to fashion is not going to, as it were, force india to join the anti-russian sanctions, but simply line up. be uh, so to speak, and strengthen relations with india in the field of economy in the area. uh, security there to create a de-format two plus two foreign minister defense minister, that is, it is clear that a in the end. uh,

the uk also wants to strengthen india's relationship with the collective west, but it doesn't work as well on the rachichit as much. uh, kind of rigid. like, uh, like the united states, yeah. eh, ivan alekseevich here. do you think this is a feature of british diplomacy in relation to their former colony? or is this some kind of signal that the west failed to force india to enter the anti-russian bloc, and from now on they will act. well at least more flexible. i don't think it's the second. i think the united states is giving the initiative to its own. allies satellite assistant in those matters in which it was not possible to achieve a quick breakthrough. and i don’t know if the uk will be able to do something, because the keyword uh in your question is from

my point of view. it is that there were colonial relations between these countries. and i don't think that uh the uk is the best, so to speak, enticer for india, for pakistan, or for other countries. here if for many indians pakistanis, after all, are fascinating, so that the indian diaspora in england is very extensive, you know, and in india there is such a joke in the description. now, if you are going there in the summer during a very hot season in july, for example, then they can tell you. oh no, not from me at this time will not. i will be in the colony. it 's such a joke about the fact that they are leaving for london at this time, but in any case, i think that all the same, historical memory remains historical memory in general, not uh, not positive. she was, by the way, positive in some e parts of the professional community in pakistan well

, for example, the pakistani military for a long time, these were, uh, people who, with such an uh, some, but penchant for english to the english order in india after all. i don't think boris johnson will be very popular and can be seen as an agent of soft power in relation. e with regard to india, even if formally there will be some consultative mechanisms created for some kind of meetings. i do not think that this format will succeed in the foreseeable future at least something substantive, e substantive to do. well, let's fast forward from asia to europe, the european union continues to discuss that the so -called sixth package of anti-russian sanctions and there has been a split between the two key countries of the european union for the introduction of the oil emba

. than other large eu countries, uh, depends on russian energy carriers, germany opposes yes, and chancellor scholz. uh, said today that, well it's hard to give up e russian energy, the more difficult it is to give up right now, and the current french government. unlike marine le pen, by the way, marine le pen also said that it is not in the interests of the citizens of the european union to abandon russian energy carriers, but the current government of emmanuel macron is in favor of almost immediately abandoning imports russian oil. well, given this split, it’s already not even there conditionally western european countries and hungary, and between france and germany yes two key pillars of the european union can we say that the european union has reached its maximum? the amount in its sanctions policy and as you can see, in general, the prospects

for the european union to abandon russian oil, especially russian gas. is it serious, well, in uh , they rightly said that the europeans themselves see these prospects differently. moreover, they see these prospects through the prism of elections. it seems to me that macron is such a hawk not only because france has a serious nuclear power industry and is less dependent on russian energy supplies, but because they considered that the majority of the french voters, after a massive russophobic company, are ready to support it. and, of course, the macron, making such speeches, certainly refers, as they used to say, to political circles, which once, let's face it , from a minor even a third-rate official, it was not politics in france that made him the leader of the country. that is, he swears to them. he says that he is ready to go much further in anti-russian sanctions than this. maybe, well, let's still not forget that some time ago he called

the president of the russian federation very actively, we can assume that he asked for some action to pull out , hypothetically, possible french and other nato employees located in mariupol, judging by everything was rejected. he's offended. and so he needs to, so to speak, e expresses his point of view with the germans, the situation is somewhat, different, atomic the energy sector was closed, it seems that it is inconvenient to open coal stations back to shoot yourself in the foot speaking out for the imbargo, it is also inconvenient. but uh, i think scholz is confused. he makes contradictory statements every day, that is, like the same anti-russian, the same about ukrainian, but to a certain extent. that is, you know, this, please, we will not do, but if in general, here i believe that the west is still an idiot gamble on russian oil and gas terms. it's hard to name, but it's too frank they are make a statement. agree that it would be smart of

them, just not to say anything, but to act. there, probably, berbach speaks from oil. we will refuse. that's when it's more difficult with gas. well, we'll try someone else. hmm, it seems that they want to push us to russia, so that we say, well, if you have already decided, in fact, to give up our gas. let us help you. it seems to me that hmm, it would be right for the western inhabitant who will receive a bill, or who get fired from work. well, i would turn my claims to the macron, i would turn to olafusholz and the european commission. so it seems to me that the situation in the european union is very complicated and ambiguous , i think that european citizens will still have their say, because their living standards are falling, and energy prices are prohibitive, we will continue to discuss the sanctions policy. west a few moments later. easter of christ live

broadcast of services from the cathedral of christ the savior april 23 on saturday on the first even if damaged liver worries, it is better to take care of it in time and restore the free multicard is paid in lenta there is everything for a bright easter

festive easter cake 250 g with a 38% discount, 59 rubles. 99 kop. eat a debit card profit and earn uralsib a reliable hour and a bank. discover profitable shopping. take your look to ozon pants from the spring collection from 699 rubles. and bags from 799 rubles. sleep deeply, sleep long sleep, as in childhood. we are investing in the future in achieving safety. we invest in our children. invest in future. order cosmetics at apteka.ru 20% discount

on your first order. when you only bought your first car in the late nineties. you then already searched for the second time, we buy and check the history of the car with the proanauto. this is already the fifth author of 25 years, do not stand still. we are waiting for you on a bright, holiday bar and rot front 42 99 for 100 g just one registration in the finns and many banks at my service. an additional 100 million were distributed. the circulation at the dacha has its own rules. no fashion only comfort no store bought only natural everyone will have no excuses, but the most important rule of giving, we buy everything, buy everything for the summer season in citylink

on the air is a big game today, the finance ministers and the heads of the central banks of the g7 countries issued a joint statement, which they adopted following the meeting on the sidelines. e, corresponding to e, the meeting of finance ministers, the g20, and so in this statement, i quote that the sanctions that the countries of the seven developed e and are developing against russia, i quote, are purposeful in order to minimize harm to third countries and the world economy. in general. so this is an absolute lie. just

an absolute lie, but because the damage to the world economy and damage. in the development of the developing countries of the third world, we have already said that now one of the main problems that humanity is facing is the problem of mass starvation, and as a result of a very serious increase. food prices are like this, and all the studies show and i want to give an example of a graph, corresponding to the fact that a there is an absolute direct relationship between e-prices, here is this chart, and there is an absolute and direct relationship between energy prices and food prices for 20 years. actually, economists have analyzed this, but, because the price of food includes it. naturally, transport costs. these are energy carriers. this is gasoline, diesel fuel, which is consumed by

combines and other agricultural machinery and so on, and western countries, introducing the oil embargo against russia significantly increases the price of oil and thereby significantly exacerbates this very hunger problem that the united nations estimates a will face in the near future 1,7. a billion people , primarily in the countries of africa and the middle east, that is, this is a fifth of humanity, so do you think that russia needs to uh, very sharply intensify information work, perhaps together with our brix partners in relation to non-western countries, and to convince them that we are not the problem, but we are the solutions, because the west will now start shouting everywhere that we are allegedly to blame for this food crisis. undoubtedly, the west will start screaming that we are to blame france and germany will continue to discuss how

to impose sanctions, while the west will split inside and have the same problems, because the economy is connected, it will have the same problems with food. just on a different scale, a and b of this among it is very important for us to take an active position, an active position regarding the non-western world community. uh, because it is very important for us to build these very bonds, including through food. this is possible, given that we are building up and once again building up our capabilities in the agro-industrial complex. we can gradually become a key supplier of various kinds of goods. e is for the countries of the east, and at the same time you can get something in return, because the countries of the east must understand in the first place. yes, what's the problem? uh, in general, these chain breaks. shaping not we are not for bursting kidneys western countries are breaking their chains today, but

our task is. as soon as the kidneys line up with the countries of vostok ivanovich of course, we must explain our position well, but it seems to me that we must share. eh, to whom and what you are explaining one thing, when you are trying to explain something to those, and who is misled, who does not understand something, and therefore, let's say, shifts the wine to the wrong one among. uh, there are a lot of developing states, because the massive information campaign, the west really and the population and even the elites are introducing misleading, it is necessary to explain, but to explain to those who know what they are doing and are lying themselves, but what can be placed here? it seems to me that we should talk, rather than an explanation about a very clear fixation of our position, so that here is that

part of the world community, which, well, maybe not a very pleasant word, but is an extra crowd who is watching all these big geopolitical and geo-economic battles, he must very clearly see two different points of view, so in the west you need to fix your point of view and explain it there useless. i'm talking specifically about the third world countries in the world community. of course, it is necessary to prove that they are being misled, they are being driven away and formulate the russian agenda for non- western countries, but what is important here is the format with which we will come out with these ideas and with the promotion of our positions and in my opinion. it's not just the traditional format. by methods of diplomacy, but this is also public diplomacy - these are contacts between think tanks. this is a joint understanding of the key issues on the international agenda, through

the prism that we can bring our position to explain how and what will undoubtedly be rebuilt russia as a key food supplier will occupy an important position, but we must clearly convey the main idea that the food crisis is a direct consequence of the sanctions that the west has imposed against russia based on its personal selfish aspirations and interests of the west usa great britain germany other european countries. these are straight lines. the perpetrators of those crises, including in the field of global food problems, medical problems that are inevitable. unfortunately , this year, as our discussion today showed, the united states and the collective west will stop in their hybrid war against russia only when the costs of this policy for themselves exceed the benefits. this also applies to the

supply of weapons to the kiev regime and sanctions and relations with non-western centers of power. this means that russia, firstly, needs to achieve such a decisive victory in the donbass, after which further support for ukraine would simply cause reputational damage. western countries themselves. secondly, russia needs to qualitatively strengthen relations with foreign countries. not only with such great powers as china and india, but also with the countries of africa and the middle east, they are the majority of humanity that is friendly to us, which means it is necessary together with partners. pobriks to fill the vacuum of global governance, including in the field of food security, which is created by the west and show dozens of developing countries that russia is not for them problem rather than solution it was a big game program. all the best. hello program time

will tell, but we continue to work live. i am artyom sheinin today, in a rather interesting way. despite the fact that a special military operation is very multifaceted and multilayered , a lot is being carried out in some, so to speak, regions of ukraine today, of course, there is a lot of attention. from the very morning, everyone was attracted to mariupol, and specifically to azov, they became the only center of resistance. yes, in general, not even resistance. it is not clear what, but, nevertheless, the cast-iron territory of mariupol attention was attracted by the fact that the minister of defense reported to the supreme commander-in-chief about, in fact, about establishing control, but let's listen to this city, mariupol. at present, the situation in the city calmly allows you to start

restoring order. the return of the population and the establishment of a peaceful life, as for those who disappeared at the plant, they stood blocked. there thoroughly and around the perimeter we are on it it takes about three or four days to complete this work, the proposed assault on the industrial zone, which i consider not expedient. i order to cancel this is the case when we must think, that is, we must always think, but in this case, especially about saving the life and health of our soldiers and officers, there is no need to climb into these catacombs and crawl underground along these e -uh, an industrial facility. block off this industrial area so that the fly does not fly through. offer again to everyone who has not yet heard

weapons to do it. the russian side guarantees their lives. and decent treatment of them in accordance with the relevant international legal acts will be provided to all who are injured. qualified medical assistance combat work to liberate mariupol of this success in fact, this is, uh, the case when in a fairly small fragment of the conversation between the commander-in-chief and the defense minister, different people heard different things, because they focused on different uh phrases, but for someone the most the main thing turned out to be the phrase that we should think, but about saving the lives of the soldiers of the officers, and in the context of the fact that there will be no assault, but because, of course, the assault on such a dungeon is fraught if

it is stormed manually, and the personnel of the womb with large losses, but many, uh, focused on just this phrase of the proposed assault on industrial zones, i consider it inappropriate to order to cancel and concluded from this that the assault was planned and was planned and was ready and it took 3-4 days, as the minister said defense and uh, they had some questions uh about why? suddenly it is canceled . how do you feel about vlad? here you are. what is the main thing you heard from this conversation? in the morning, when i heard, i was just referring to the second part, because i returned from mariupol, i understand, firstly, the assault is underway. it is not that the assault was supposed to begin, it goes itself, the call of steel, the assault will already be tight. for a whole week, and moreover, in this studio, as if all those present remember, i said many times that there was no need to rush anyone anywhere. yes, our task is not take it for the holiday, and our task is to protect people, that

is, when we finish we will have 10,000 excellent fighters left, and ukraine will be minus 10,000 well-trained nazis, and yet. here. uh, suddenly stop, of course, me personally. this raised a lot of questions. aha the first of them and most importantly, which means, uh, stop the assault. stop the assault absolutely, that is, cease fire. that's leave them alone. let them sit, what is called until the green brooms or is it? we don't go ahead. we don't waste people, we don't continue movement, but nevertheless we deliver a constant blow and constant defeats, we identify targets, we destroy these targets. these are, of course, two very big fortunes. you see, ra- the difference is what is called stop what? well, of course, everyone has questions. why is it ours to stop the assault, suddenly the saxon fell in with yesterday's statement by nuland, who said that nato is ready to accept e humanitarian, so to speak, convoy e to withdraw the

wounded from mariupol, e, and everyone else. that is , all at once, of course, the question arose of how much they are cardinal among themselves. i think that there is still no coordination in this, and yet the society is unconditional. it is necessary to explain what is happening, what it means, because, unfortunately, we are all traumatized. with the ghost of budyonovsk, we are all too well, we remember this, especially those who are a little older, and there , too, in principle, they stopped the assault. then, out of humanitarian considerations, they let them go out, and then for another 5 years they fought with the same bastards, but already on completely different conditions, until we remind them destroyed, in the toilet even then the decision was made to destroy and destroy, therefore in my opinion. ah, military logic. under the decision there is undoubtedly, but this one and the logic still needs to be clarified to society. and what does it mean? here in practice, but look, after all, there are also words that block this industrial zone so

that the fly does not fly by. as i understand it, block so that the fly does not fly through , and so that it does not fly there, and so that it does not fly from there. i agree with you. i didn't quite understand what was said either. does this suggest that they are just there, well, roughly , uh, like rats are locked in a dungeon, and they get there on their own. well, as someone wrote here , it starts there without water without well, there. so that they sit until they reach it, or just, as it is said again, they don’t go there, but here it’s to hammer it all slowly, uh, continues, but i really didn’t fully understand this either, this question really remains, but the question of that to the question of that no one is going to let anyone go anywhere. in general, we will definitely get the answer, but here, too, you need to understand that this is still a very serious military operation. even here, uh, the organization of blockades i will explain 1.500 sits there inside it is so according to the estimates on which all these one and a half thousand people converge desperate of course. and if

these one and a half thousand decide to break through from there, and there are, as i understand it, a lot of where to break through from, if they decide to break through from there, then, of course, it is required to maintain very serious forces in the city in order to block these breakthroughs, if they are and unconditionally of course we need this case, it is very clear to understand that this is a military operation. of course, it has no analogues, but it can be considered finished. in my opinion, until there is still no resistance. well, look again, and since we and it seems to me, this is absolutely the most. yes, i want to say that we will get the answer to our main question tomorrow morning, namely, namely, if in the morning information comes from our correspondents that the strikes are continuing, but the assault is not going on. this means that everything is going well. that is, we do not spend people. we just trample them, as they say, and give them the opportunity to think about their own.