why am i still paying attention to this somewhere inside me, by the way, about howitzers about these, which fly on some kind of planes and about these tanks, which turned out to be some kind of light armored personnel carriers or obsolete t-72 scrap metal, which, of course, also drives and shoots. i have a feeling more and more, and this is not some kind of here. well, such a screen, yes, than you remember the film the man from capuchin boulevard when one of the heroes told us about america, this country could be corruption. here i am i think that, just like in afghanistan , billions of dollars are being laundered, supposedly, something is being supplied, in fact. everyone, uh, perfectly understands that there is nothing there uh that is supplied. in fact, it remains on paper girls in the pocket in the right bank, and moreover, this is the most disgusting thing for those who have not joined the sanctions. perhaps some of these weapons are already going to the middle east in order to stabilize children in order to, uh, ignite a conflict there, so that the americans get that very cheap oil. we must now think about

security not only in our country, but also in our opera plus partners. in fact, it's clear, that is, you confirm my very accurate assumption. it seems that in this whole story of supply, supply, supply , supply, you, as a financier, also see more such a financial bubble than such afghanistan yes, a trillion dollars of broads were laundered there to protect brand-sporters from these artisanal mines, well, a pipe with nails and explosives spent, 62 billion dollars. it's more than that's times more military budget, how can it be real? how are you destroying now? eh, the world of some of our compatriots - true, they all already, of course, who are in israel who are in georgia who are where those compatriots in the world of which this is impossible in the usa. and what is it really possible to know, people came here because the price of curds didn’t rise, they turn on the tv, and they are told this in the usa. corruption, if you, if you were, but about the

table, and it's not like that. here, here is oleg, after all, you can immediately see they were studying. you and i are on the same cleaning. here, after all, what the dog rummaged through, as our leader one biden said, is not like that. i am now speaking quite seriously, without irony, i treat him, so to speak, biden is not such a question, because he has never again been filmed with the language of biden is not like that, because he is no longer. but in the light of the fact that he is no longer next to him , it is possible, and now i will demonstrate this to you, how there are those who, perhaps, use the fact that he is no one. and there is something to write off for the war. here, imagine. we just now they were discussing with you that in the morning he was talking about mariupol something, so he said, i just can’t tell him in the morning mariupol well, there it went there at 5:00 for the summer, so, well, and there 8:39 an elderly man wakes up, they tell him, there sir,

there mariupol he doesn’t understand anything, but nods, mariupol and then they push him some more paper and say, well, with mariupol. we will control everything now. you, most importantly, sign, and he signs, and he signs, and he signs nothing. and here is what he then he talks about it. what did he sign. listen. last week, i signed an $800 million aid package to ukraine, including artillery systems and armored personnel carriers, but the equipment that ukrainians need now in the context of the intensification of hostilities in the donbass is a different terrain, there is flat terrain. they need other weapons. i'm announcing another $800 million in aid. this is a heavy artillery weapon. centurion howitzers hundreds of thousands of ammunition for them. there are many tactical drones out there. the last two months we are at a record pace. delivering weapons to ukraine thousands of drones, grenade launchers, radar systems and other systems 15 million ammunition the united states delivered 10

anti-tank systems per russian tank, and we continue to share information with ukraine divorced to help them defend against russian aggression about dawn information is true anti-tank grenade launchers. i think that is true, although many of them are already being mastered by the fighters of the dpr of the lpr. but this one, you know, last week, i signed 800 million, and now i signed again for 800 million. and now 4 billion signed that i remember that there is someone in his entourage. who gave him 200 bucks, because there was a story that one of his 200 bucks hit him? and who said what these same people think, listen, he doesn’t remember what he signed for 800 million on the last day. come on, it means that these people are signing him and these nemtsov are still dragging him along. but it’s like that, yes, and then, uh, how would they all think, listen, well, listen if he looks at the rabbit and

doesn’t understand this. he alone sees this rabbit or everyone around sees this rabbit too. i won't be surprised that he will now start signing something like a billion each week, and this is where the most important question arises. what if the version is that there are also craftsmen who cut this with a jigsaw, then how large can the scale of this be? look, i’m in this regard. i hope that corruption will really destroy america. they entered our edematous classic film, but at the same time, the weapons that are supplied to ukraine are supplied in parallel with specialists who train ukrainians in five centers in poland. ah, to use these heavy weapons and these centers work in parallel, and those deliveries that took place even before the announcement of this assistance. they are happening. they really go through the area. poland somehow, it turns out, they are just

voluminous. that's just what it is. i have a party here, ours just announced that, uh , uh, the ministry of foreign affairs. this time , she stated directly, speaking to the representative of the united states that us-nato transports with weapons following the ukrainian territory the armed forces of the russian federation have the right to consider as legitimate military targets, and the director of the north america department limit koshelev but we all have been waiting for this statement, so we have been saying so for a month after the statement. well, look, we have been saying this for a month, but still, but the active destruction of the same railway infrastructure. here in such an active phase began something quite recently. literally now the day before, zaporozhye is the same the notorious bridge across the dnieper was blown up, you perfectly understand that those very deliveries were announced as heavy weapons. there, uh, artillery, they may well somehow find themselves at the grouping, which is now located exactly where kramator, slavyansk, and so on.

generally speaking, yes, of course, the americans are sawing, they are sawing the military budget, the military budget is more than eight hundred billion dollars. yes, they will play pr on the one hand. e company that you see we supply so much. we even supply which may be the ukrainians themselves do not want, but only some part will reach. it doesn't matter. this means that the prolongation of this conflict plays into the hands, including not only their politicians. for those who, but the precedent itself is important, see. i just want to explain. uh, with these statements, biden, he, uh, the way back to a certain skating rink. he destroys it the same way. well suddenly the americans say. so, they say, the option began to speak. yes, you know no, i'm talking about something else that you know, dear ukrainians. of course we support you. well, all the way to the rollback to myself no, i'm talking about something else, that if they announced such military assistance, they announced this support,

and the americans force the europeans to give more weapons, and you say they do it, respectively. if these cuts, kickbacks, and so on really happen on some grandiose scale, then biden himself is already the most unpopular president of the united states of america at the moment. look at his rating. he really is. in my opinion. oh, god forbid, of course, he has health, but he simply won’t live out his term, because that’s what’s with him will happen from the point of view, again, this information company, how he promoted help to ukraine here, this will destroy him, completely destroy his administration. but the fact that we finally began to consider them. eh, deliveries, it seems, like the military goals were generally correctly stated more than once, not twice. well, in my opinion. this is also very familiar. i really hope the piece of iron was not bombed, the whole war. yes, we will see just by the infrastructure, which is still there in the west, which would seek war, the actual statement that their transports from weapons. these are legitimate military targets. this is not yet a statement that we will bomb the piece of iron. how

are they different? well, let's clarify the first mot weapon that was not supplied before, it was supplied not so much by piece of iron, because all these anti-tank systems were all that they supplied before. it was much easier to transport it, by the way, to add to what you are saying, now e kirby said that they carry howitzers on planes, but still they cannot howitzers on planes, they unload. yes, therefore, of course, they will be hunted, but i wanted to return to the planes. you know, there is one more nuance here, about which, well, it’s worth saying the problem is that there’s nowhere to take weapons, when, uh, our valiant kirby promised that we gave planes to everyone involved in aviation, the question arose where did you take them? yes? that is, where did you not give ukraine to f16 in xv and can’t fly them, but there are no more soviet ones, or there are so many of them that no one will give them back, or they simply don’t exist and is now emerging. the same story with europe , what did they rake out? already a lot, you know?

we ourselves don’t need to save something in case there’s nothing special to fight with, and europe was shrinking, shrinking to shrinking to such a state that when suddenly there was a conversation about selling us old leopard tanks, it turned out that those which the old ones have long been sold. they are already there, wherever they just do not go. for which countries, and those that remain there are 200-something new pieces. they are only for themselves you know wild for sebs. i think in ukraine, and now the question arises that the only supplier of weapons is really real, this is america, but again, in order to supply it, you need to, firstly, somehow deliver people to train. and most importantly, dozens of units are not something with which you can win, and there is a strong feeling that yes. ukraine is turning into a magnificent black hole where everything can be written off. well, again, like afghanistan in the last year and a half there, eh, but at the same time, in fact, e about these very uh, the supply of weapons, but there are, uh, serious passions, just those same european countries,

because as i understand it, and in germany, the whole thing is already balancing on the level, it doesn’t sound funny, but at the level of this almost inside political crisis, because scholz. well, there were still military people there, that is, first look what happened, and with the fact that some want to supply heavy weapons to ukraine, while others don’t really want to listen. the ministry of defense of germany has reduced the list of export weapons at least twice for ukraine, which was previously prepared by representatives of the military-industrial complex of the country, based on requests. kyiv in march ukraine reported a specific need for heavy weapons in several rocket launchers and anti-ship missiles, as well as anti-tank missiles back in mid-march, almost all the weapons required by ukraine were on the list, then scholz's office took out a red pencil.

as a result, the list originally presented by the ukrainian side was reduced from 48 to 24 pages of 15 types of weapons, and deliveries which kiev requested, only three positions remained in the final document, including an indication of possible alternatives. and now, look now, that is, we see from this that someone, apparently, wants someone for some reason does not want, perhaps somehow says that in general, they themselves don’t have any or or what there are other considerations, and then it all goes into a regime, as i said, almost inside the political crisis, now we are listening to spiel. at present, the debate in germany has intensified on the need supply of heavy weapons to kiev, the opposition conservative bloc, the christian democratic and christian social unions, headed by leader friedrich merz, plans to submit a resolution to the bundestag next week that allows the supply of heavy weapons to ukraine,

if such a decision is not accepted by schultz, the majority, including the ruling coalition, are for the supply of weapons to kiev if scholz continues to be against the supply of heavy weapons to ukraine, his position will become so precarious that in the bundestag, the question of confidence in schulz as head of government may arise. that is, this weapon has not yet reached where. and it is already beginning, what is more precisely, continues to destroy germany, not only economically, but politically, how do you explain this. this is, well, on the one hand, if the germans can often brew one bag of cups, then there is a certain ska. that is, it is quite understandable, that is, when out of forty-eight pages it becomes 24, then, well, this is also about the issue of a tough economy. but this is their weapon, really already. well, as if there is nothing to give or they have something to give, but for one reason or another, by the way, the military, including, in general, do not want to get into this. well, this is the

most important question. roughly speaking, this is a warehouse or political issue. this, of course, is a political issue in germany, the most sensible heads understand that the longer it drags on. the longer the crisis drags on. e in ukraine, the worse for europe and the worse for germany itself, its economy, first of all, but the desire to bend, even to the detriment. e interest of the country under the dictates of pressure from washington it has certain politicians and scholz, despite the fact that he clearly flexes. he is not yet one of the most such gigs; there are more flexible policies. who are ready to bend more for the sake of the trans-atlantic and their e-career political interests, but let's remember the word of the account that said the one who did everything has the right to complain like a reptile worm, so that they can crush it later. well, i never forgot these words of kant, the main thing is whether

scholz knows them. i think he owes us to remind him the most amazing thing, that not only do we remind him, the british are here for him, and this conflict is already coming out, well, you are already talking at the level, and the americans are giving them away. now the question is, who is it now? who is under pressure here, the british put pressure on him so much that it will not seem enough. to be honest, i was generally surprised, because this is already reaching some level that i could not imagine and you could not imagine. a great miracle that takes place every year, will the holy fire again descend on the tomb, lord, the events of which the orthodox world awaits with trepidation? convergence holy fire live broadcast from jerusalem on saturday on the first time will show

we continue to work live many times from different angles, discussing a special military operation , we have already said many times that in fact this is a conflict of such a level that, perhaps, even not only and not only in ukraine, and even maybe, strange as it may seem to you, maybe even not only and not so much in russia as such, but in these contradictions that have matured between everyone everywhere and, oddly enough, it will appear, including between nato members. so we talked about the fact that there is this difficult situation with the fact that the germans either supply weapons or do not supply weapons. schwaltz does not want to completely become a worm. and it seems like the military is also resisting, or whether they take something else and all of a sudden. who do you think is sewn into germany on this occasion by the british. and who else is listening to the case, if germany does not stop buying russian gas, let it then also face sanctions against anyone who buys german goods are actually

financing putin's war right now. if the germans do not want to make sacrifices, this is their problem, the moment is undoubtedly close for introducing restrictive measures against berlin. although germany is one of the most powerful economies in the world. we will be able to replace it with the goods of a car, we will import chemicals from france and japan from south korea or the usa. i read this article to the end and kept waiting for it to say we , uh, tear it up. uh, the german economy is in tatters, well, it hasn't come to that yet. you say americans are given to them. well, it seems to me that this is quite an indicator that when i read this and thought, i wonder, but now it will come to the germans that all this distribution with ukraine is with this conflict. it was possible, invented not only to create problems for us, to create problems for germany by the british, well, the british always follow washington's fairway although sometimes following in this formatter they overtake the boss a little. but this is

only ingeniousness, nothing more, if, uh, when trends change in the usa, then the uk corrects his behavior. but this is a kind of continuation of brexit in my opinion. that is, these are economically uh conflicts that are already breaking out, including in the western camp of the economic situation, it has been deteriorating for a long time and is deteriorating not because of the events in ukraine and here there is not enough for everyone. e, and therefore , cynically requires victims from germany. but this is what is on the surface, but in fact there is a very tough fight in this trade and economic dispute, and britain sometimes does not even hide that it does not want to see a strong german economy in fact. here comes the question. but is it still journalistic rhetoric, or is it, uh, zategraph broadcasting some idea, that is, we can imagine some kind of pressure. uh, let's just say, but

the political sanctions on germany from the side of the allies of the ropes, look here, these are, as it were, what is smart, that he does not have a fool on his tongue. this is in this case saying deltelligraph, but in fact here we remembered we must remember the concept that existed before that britain came out from the eu, in any case, is now a competitor, so hitting a competitor, in any way , is very good, but hitting competitors on a locomotive. this is even better, because when germany is struck, it is always a blow to everything, because germany is an assembly machine, germany's resources are transferred there. in the state of the goods, and in this case, there are not even any sanctions, but even public sanctions, when you call, do not buy german, this is a blow primarily throughout the eu, you understand from italy and france airbus

you understand what, that is, german french or whose conversation is actually about what i understand, the question is, do the germans understand, and if they understand, how much time do they have left for this understanding, if they understand, remember this , how many times we discussed these ideas of george friedman in this program. eh, this is the very thing between the sea, yes, this one is actually actually a barrier between the baltic and the black sea, which i was lining up. how many times have we shown this map, but this one, this one, this is all between the sea, which cut off germany from russia and that's it. it. strictly speaking, for the sake of this and e happened precisely yes, that 's about just between the sea. i'm just talking about who and why helps ukraine and what is generally global. i just want to remind you that only in the summer of 2021. in this studio, we discussed with you how the british were going to actually monopolize the black sea. well thanks to what they build. there, together with the ukrainians. the so-called bases of the british

royal navy went there now, if you look closely at the map, i don’t even i'm talking about what will happen when the special, military operation ends, our control over the zaporozhye region over the kherson region. this is such a reality that this project between the seas is simply leveled at the root. and i 'm not talking about what else is there, nikolaev is still there, odessa yes, even the fact that kherson and zaporizhzhia are already here now radically changes the whole concept of the british, who, as we remember, were actually going to become only in the summer the main ones looking after ukraine and this is what vladislav was talking about, the second economic moment, and when there were tough brexit negotiations, it was the germans who insisted that the british should pay after britain left. and if they do not pay, then there will be a hard exit, respectively, the british. in this case, they experience agony. they lost at the geo-economic level and at the geopolitical level they lost, because again, we repeat our control. here are these southern regions. again

, i don't want to guess. i am not a wang, but i i am sure that no one from kherson will leave zaporozhye, that this territory in any status does not matter what status it will be. it will not be controlled by ukraine, and this blows up this plan between the sea and the entire british, in fact, policy aimed at this fed. but then look, what if we say this, but we say it and we understand, remember this map, that the goal was not only about ukraine, but the goal was to build this cordon against germany once again to prevent the german industry unite with russian resources, then it turns out that the battle for ukraine from the beginning is , well, relatively speaking, a battle in general for the fate of germany and german industry and because if you said it right, well, you say, there is kherson zaporizhzhya but if you look all brits are cut off. yes, but they are cut off, but you understand that then it must inevitably be. so, of course, and then for them it is already inevitable to counteract this. we ask.

why are they here all the time here they are building up and they’re building up and building up, but because it ’s not zelensky at stake. they don’t have any zelensky at all on the eve of their game. this is a huge scheme of how the world will work and what role. they will play in it, right? well , really here. well, i don't know if it's appropriate to remember? yes, the ideas of uh, uh continental alliances, yes, uh russian-german, yes, that is, but in pre-revolutionary times. that is, e, as it were, a guarantee of peace in europe - this is peace and cooperation between russia and germany, of course, controversial which is for twentieth century. uh, some corrosion could have come out, but nonetheless. and remember this phrase. e. is it possible to restore this phrase to this significance now in my opinion? unfortunately, no, because you asked, yes, and when the germans wake up, because don’t buy german, i’ll only be happy if all, uh,

all of europe stops buying, german, it ’s very good, then they will understand, but it will be too late, because it is all a self-sucking funnel. here, i'm a cancellation culture, yes, i'm only right, uh liberal sector so to speak. yes, this was used in america by biden against trump. yes , it was used in the first macron elections in france, yes. uh, it was kind of used in brexic. yes, only i am right, and so a step aside. uh, step left step right. you've been a respectable journalist all along. you are nobody, you were a teacher. the university wrote books. you were nobody, you were in the workshop of europe and you needed this cheap gas, but now you have been put in a situation where you cannot. and now you are in putin's blood just like putin himself yes, because there, when we showed it the teleground. there is this poster. she is holding. eh, there, like hey germans, how much do you save there on one liter of pro-germany, how much do you

save on one liter of blood? well, that’s all, that ’s all. and just here this question arises about a self-sucking funnel, because the germans, of course, are now being sucked into this funnel, but they themselves are being sucked into it, because this is the dispute about the rejection of our energy carriers. eh, well, there, of course, there is a conversation going on. there about oil coal, but it is clear that gas is behind all this brackets. and here they are, here you are, anna lena berkova, who says that we are completely refusing this until the end of the summer. from this to half of deliveries by the end of the year, we will come to zero about gas, she says nothing, but it is clear that the rate is yes. and here's a man who understands here is scholz. he says that the embargo on the supply of gas from the russian federation is an insurmountable challenge. and here's another man who is not about politics, about which he does not want to be sucked into this funnel and attention to our conversation, which suggests that if germany allows itself to be sucked into this funnel, then together with germany the whole eu can be sucked into it in

the process of being sucked into the funnel. he can crack listen to the german gas specialist, please. i consider the rejection of russian gas a wrong step. such a move will hurt not only germany, huge problems will arise throughout europe , for example, slovakia is completely dependent on russian gas, and countries such as the czech republic and austria gets most of its gas from russia in many other eu countries, russian gas accounts for at least a significant share of the supply, if we think we can supply germany without caring about other countries together, then this is our selfish approach. it will simply tear the eu apart, it will tear it apart, that is, at stake, in fact, not only a person understands, what he is talking about, not only the german economy. in general, everything here is this association, which is called the eu, the world has moved into a state of hypercompetition and allies became competitors. and it didn't happen today. here. uh, when we talk

about sanctions in britain, threats to britain, uh, against germany let's remember that in the eighteenth year , even tra sanctioned germany tariffs on german steel on the volkswagen concert car was so punished that the total costs reach 50 billion euros. that's how they really trusted volkswagen and it will continue. as for the analysm, berg spoke out very frankly. uh, american council on international relations is an organization that was created before the first world war and considered itself such a conductor of world politics. they posted such an interesting thing on their website, and last year it appeared that green is an instrument of us influence on europe, mind you, no greens, but they are not allowed into america. yeah, here is such a green alien in the body of the european union, here is a heavy larva, which is like that there. well, what not, if

at the same time it destroys germany, but the flag of europe yes , this is a hyperconference, yes, it must be destroyed, uh, then eat must. only one, as they said in the movie , it's true, but look at what you just said about the fact that you called it hypercompetition. yes. and you kind of started to answer my next question, which i wanted to ask you, because it interests me very much. i don't quite understand, i don't quite understand. here is what i read here. uh, how the international monetary fund evaluates, what about the prospects for a fall in world gdp and russian gdp when i opened these headlines, i think, well, they will write there now. what do you know, the world gdp will be, so somehow it’s not very good, but russia, like, this is a ruinous area, and suddenly it turns out that the russian economy, that is, the world gdp is up to 3.6 and the russian economy will now be returned to me there. well

, it would seem, in the same place it was about double digits and so on and so forth they are in the twenty-second year. at 8.5%, and in the twenty-third to two and three and then i ask a question. that is, this is, as it were, all this one, which means that they mean with a western fist, and at the same time we have eight and five this year falling, and then 2.3, something does not converge with me. i don’t understand anything about this, how the clap of one palm sounds. so, when they say, these numbers are the desired numbers, they will be if we do nothing, but if the government is ready to add to the economy, uh, uh, 4 1/2 trillion rubles. and this is the amount that can be spent on helping the economy, then these 8.5 turns into minus four. well, our gdp there is somewhere more than a hundred people, more than a hundred rubles. yes, if we are

like, we are losing these 8.5 trillion four s half, add and that's all and completely different figures for the fall. well, it's like a dollar for 200 rubles. you wanted to see you, even in your wishlist. they say that in the twenty-second year we will have everything. well, sort of like this. that's how i surprised me about it, not even that it was a wishlist, i was surprised that even in the wishlist. in general, i have nothing catastrophic. i have a feeling that our chairman of the accounts chamber. we are drawing a worse result than these guys are drawing, that is, two and three in the twenty-third year. this means recognizing that that even you wishful thinking they have not achieved anything, that the economy will be rebuilt, that there is china, india and countries that have not joined the sanctions that will replace those same european partners. that is, that is, roughly speaking, it turns out that here they act like balls, that here we were choking, choking, choking, and not choking. well, now it was said, absolutely the key phrase.