either let's understand that we will not decide what is necessary for our security, also they will now move the line of defense of their defense alliance to the south china sea. all this is connected with the creation, the creation of the auks, and the tightening of the vaukos already japan korea with an attempt. pull half of the osian countries there, splitting the entire architecture that has evolved here over many decades and was based on consensus on the participation of all major players, including the united states, russia, india, japan, china, and australia. this is now already. and also subject, but changes in the mainstream of unipolarity, which by all truths and falsely they are trying, but trying to save, but i really hope that and yet, as everyone does spells, which we should by no means allow. it is in this

context that the third world war is considered in the constant provocations of zelensky and his team, who demand almost the introduction of nato troops in order to protect the ukrainian government, and everyone always says that we will provide weapons. and which, of course, adds fuel to the fire, and they want these supply of weapons to force the ukrainians to fight. uh, with russia to the last soldier. if only this conflict dragged on longer, if only as they hope. russia suffered from it more and more, but directing weapons. and in general, i propagate my efforts. on this direction. all leaders say that the issue of sending nato troops is excluded, except for poland, by the way, which, by the way, is through the mouth of its prime minister from marovets. proposed some kind of peacekeeping operation in ukraine a. obviously interested

send their troops there under peacekeeping flags. well, then we can imagine how the historical craft of the poles will reverberate, who will find themselves in their former territory in the west of ukraine , completing the long floor most of all. he received. all i have the answer completing the answer to the question. how are we supposed to behave? and how can this be compared with the caribbean crisis or not, and then there was a channel of communication that we trusted both of these leaders now there is no such channel and no one is trying to create it separate timid attempts made at an early stage. they did not give a big result, but they were. we are tense with the fact that already desperate

to reach out to nato all these years, when it expanded despite promises, when, contrary to our warnings, they pumped weapons into ukraine and spared its russophobic essence in every possible way. this is the essence of the regime that was established under poroshenko and is being strengthened under zelensky. and when we warned about the inadmissibility of drawing ukraine into nato, and now, as the last last attempts, if you want the last gesture, goodwill offered the americans and nato members to conclude appropriate security treaties, in which treaties, and security. of all the states in the euro-atlantic area, including ukraine, of course, we all understood that ukraine is a bone of contention, which, however, revealed a much deeper, more

global problem, but nevertheless, this is a bone of contention that became such a trigger in these processes, and we proposed to conclude a treaty with both the united states and nato and how we we will provide guarantees for all countries collectively without expanding any military-political blocs. we were polite, but hmm heard and then we were told that well, it is not possible for us to limit the expansion to this would be contrary to the open door principle. uh, although we discussed the charter of uh, the north atlantic alliance. there, uh, article ten, it's not about open ideas. and about the fact that nato is consensual. itself can invite new members if these new members meet the criteria, but apparently democratic control and so on and if

most importantly, if these new members will contribute to strengthening the security of the strange, then there’s nothing about what open doors are we talking about and of course, when they took montenegro, northern macedonia, albania well, how can they strengthen security and the atlantic alliance if it is a defensive lens and this simply shows that nato expansion has nothing to do with the fulfillment of its statutory goals, that this is the development of territory under american command in line with the strengthening and attempts to perpetuate that same unipolar world, but the negotiations that took place then, and between our delegations by the united states, then i met with blinkin and then our team went to nato where they presented the treaty already in the nato

context in the context of russia nato they showed that no desire to take into account our legitimate interests. uh, none of them showed our security interests when we told them, dear friends. it’s right on our borders that putin has repeatedly publicly stated that they have already approached right to our doorstep. against all our requests statements of caution. they just came up and are not going to change anything and they say it's not against you, your safety, nothing threatens. well, it's like, in general, you can plant at the end of russia, yes, any other country, they say, nothing threatens you. do not worry. this is also, by the way, to say. how uh? right now they are actively courting india, they want to involve it in

their formats in every possible way. here boris johnson went. before that , american delegates and the first deputy went there. secretary of state to andy sherman in public. this is all being done without any hesitation, she publicly stated, either in the senate hearings, or in an interview that we, the united states , must definitely help india understand what she needs to ensure her security. this is not said to some tiny island country. this is said by the great civilization and in much the same way they tell china that we will explain to china, what punishment will follow if it supports russia and at the same time my extreme thought, answering this question at the same time, but when the united states suddenly decided that for more than 10,000 kilometers there is a threat to their interests, whether it be in belgrade in yugoslavia, the former, whether it be in iraq and whether it be somewhere else in the middle east, without hesitation without

any legal, but torment, and without even trying to look into international law. his staffon sent bomby troops away from civilian targets. and how was it in belgorod bridges passenger trains? uh, the television center was bombed, it wasn’t told that, isn’t it the center, this is an organ aggressive serbian propaganda. approximately in brackets, i’ll note how now, uh, president macron does not give accreditation. eh, artie and his companion elisha palace, calling them not the media but propaganda tools. so, in general, these manners and habits and manners, they are deeply seated. and here, and when yes, when iraqi mosuls or syrian rakka are leveled simply with the ground, and the corpses lay there for weeks, uh, neglected. that's it,

i repeat. across the ocean. security threats to the united states. in kosovo they created, uh, beautiful the largest in the balkans. and maybe even not only in the balkans a military base, and which no one is going to withdraw from there, and the reasons were the very instability that milosevic allegedly whipped up in this region and oppressed albanian representatives in kosovo. here, well, i emphasize once again, considering myself the right to ensure their security where they please, we are denied the right to defend our own borders, and the territories where the russians live and whom these russians have been oppressed for many years, exposing them to bombings. ah, subjecting bullying. e, infringing on their rights, and on language on culture on traditions. here's where the problem lies. this is an irreparable confidence in one's own rightness in one's

own exclusivity of such a term. naturally, the exceptional exceptional nation, which both democrats and republicans equally use, and this sense of superiority. it, of course, e revives. uh, some memories , especially now when er russophobia and real racism in relation to everything russian is cultivated at the highest level, as recently said, if you take here's a neighbor, the united states to canada, uh, mr. trudeau, the prime minister said that putin and everyone who supports him should be punished and added not only russia but all russians will pay for what is happening just like that what you said, i think in the administration in washington you did not even deny it. they would have put it a little differently. they would say, well,

you, mr. minister, they come out in earnest to insist that authoritarian countries should have the same rights that countries should be democratic. i will yes, because you will and it seems to them that this is not acceptable. this is one of the main conceptual differences, as it seems to me, between moscow and washington, and the second, when they tell you that nato is a strictly defensive alliance and russia has nothing to fear, but they mean, e that you are not stupid, not naive, they mean to tell you that it concerns the situation when you behave correctly. i understand this very well. and if if suffering begins to behave in terms of, uh, the union of democracy, which are called nato

wrong, then, of course, depending on what this country is doing, and it may run into unpleasant consequences. and it seems to me that in nato it does not hide it in any way. when nerves are at their limit, magnelis b6 is magnesium fortified with vitamin b6 magnelis b6 is up to 30% more affordable than a similar imported drug? this is lena, and she has just found the apartment of her dreams, completed all the documents necessary for the purchase. and now she has become the owner of an apartment in a nine-story building near the park, because an apartment is now being bought for mru.

sleep deep sleep long sleep like in childhood services and many banks at my service. tired of waiting for couriers trust your favorite pharmacy. order medicine with us 20% discount on your first order. only two weeks of jackpot from russian lotto. it does not matter how the rates on the exchanges change. we always bet on people. for us, a fortune is not millions, but confidence, dignity, pride in this is our strength, the

strength of our country. kinopoisk, plus millions of tracks for any mood on yandex.music, plus my wave, a new recommendation system that knows what you like, and for free until the summer of yandex.plus, a subscription with many pluses in the bank. uralsib, we made a credit card for 120 days without interest, with which everything adds up. leave a request to uralsib.ru. tele2 i found an unusual object similar to my grandfather's rarity - this is an old smartphone device of a person of the 21st century.

this season is fashionable, how to get out profitable shopping collect your look on ozon pants from spring collections from 699 rubles. and bags from 799 rubles. it is important for a large technological bank to stay face to face with a person in 3 minutes in two clicks on one call in order to justify your trust to support you, really, issuing loans every day other types of pain pentalkin do without pain this spring will grow its universe along with the tape. get a stick of seeds for shopping and find a rare sunflower. again, on all windowsills of the country, the vtb team is

looking for advertising that will help you get a free vtb multicard; right in front of you, you can easily pay for purchases, more payments, infinity transfers, a return of up to twenty percent of cashback from partners and everything will work out. this is in view of the dangers you spoke about and in view of the very serious discrepancy in approach to international relations. yes, in general , to what modern civilization is. what is he doing about the crisis around e ukraine is there today, in the conditions of this island of conflict in ukraine and in the conditions of this large discrepancy between positions and mutual distrust between

russia, nato nato at the head of the united states, if there are any prospects for e, negotiations on peaceful regulation in ukraine, well, firstly, two comments about yours. uh, comments on my uh, the answer is the previous one, and the united states, like all other u countries, that boast u that they are democracies without uh. any flaw they all signed ratified the un charter where again emphasized the key principle is the sovereign equality of the state. it doesn't say that a democracy should have more rights and an autocracy should have fewer rights in a dictatorship of a monarchy, and it doesn't say at all that there is, uh, any difference as to the rights in which members of it have. yes, there is a security council. this is somewhat special. uh, article uh, but

we all know why roosevelt insisted on a security site with five permanent beta members. he did not want him to repeat the fate of the league of nations, and if it were not for this institution, which, i repeat, was initiated by roosevelt. he probably would have sunk into oblivion long ago, like the leagues. uh, because when a-a great holding. uh, they do not have the opportunity to use their prerogatives and negotiate among themselves, nothing good comes from this, but the right of veto makes them negotiate. at least, for many, many years now it has forced, uh, they are trying, and the americans are other western countries. and this is right. the veto, in fact , devalue, and by, but the transfer of the prerogatives of the security site in the general assembly, where

they can by twisting arms through blackmail threats, and up to threats that concern the places where the bank accounts of the delegations are kept, the place where their children are educated. they get it. here is the forced majority achieved by force. this tendency is dangerous, therefore the security council with its five has the right to veto this five. it's like this in general. mm, the last island of international law, the rest is trying to replace everything, not in vain, uh, the united states arranged the democracies themselves. here president biden held at the end of last year and plan this year and a second summit to hold and create an organization that will unequivocally, rather function as an anti-won or replacement for the un trend. for several years now, the west has been breeding, first of all in europe, the

french, the germans are active in this direction. they are spawning various platform calls, and partnerships on topics that are already under consideration. here, well, for example, a partnership under international humanitarian law of a limited composition, not everyone is taken there for a question. why don't you want to consider these issues in a universal format? is there a management? he has a department for refugee affairs, he is for human rights. no. you have a lot there, and you know such retrogrades in the un, these all sorts of autocracies, plus not enough, a democratized country. we need to develop ideas that will be progressive created by the french and germans. in the same vein, the alliance of democracy is the alliance of multiloteralists. well that is the

multilateral alliance in question. and why did you forget about the un, which is the highest embodiment of multilateralism, where there are all the states of the world, well, with some exceptions, not recognized the state answer is again the same it is an organization where it is necessary to process those who oppose multilateralism, and we need a progressive vanguard of multiloteralists. here we will follow the example. uh, the eu's approach to multilateral cooperation will build like-minded people around us. this is very this again this feeling of superiority. and at the same time even unwillingness to discuss important things. e formats, where they will object to you and where they will oppose you, they don’t want to, because for a long time it will be up to them as soon as possible all sorts of their here these neoliberal reforms

to implement. well, plus. i think they feel that they will not have enough arguments, if in such an honest political battle, but arguments will be presented, that is, from the other side. by the way, that's when the democracies themselves convened, look at the list of invitees. there are countries there that the united states has never considered democratic, to which the united states has made many claims in terms of relations with what the united states understands as democracy, but which have been included in the union of democratic countries only because the united states wants to use the strategic position of these states in their own interests, and they want to fit them under this democratic umbrella, as it were, and thereby, uh, flatter them and continue to use them for themselves and extreme comments on this topic, as well. when we talk about democracy

autocracy authoritarian states, but just recently, american political scientists began to talk about india while unofficial persons, political scientists are not like the largest democracies in the world. how about a country that they call an electoral autocracy. i am told his indian friends about it. they smiled and said, we know, and therefore there are many methods to keep. uh, this or that country is trying to keep this or that country in suspense about the negotiations on ukraine, and we firmly know that it is not the united states, they are the uk, who are trying in every possible way to compensate for their lonely status after leaving the european union with their activity, they are quiet, not london neither washington is advising zelensky.

they advise zelensky to take negotiations to toughen his position each time, which we have observed here after istanbul where in istanbul, as president, putin has repeatedly said in his interviews and conversations, with colleagues, we received from them for the first time, and a proposal on paper, and with signatures, the leaders of their delegation and these proposals. we were ready to take as a basis, they required improvement. naturally, to be consensual, but we positively assessed them and proposed ukrainian proposals as well. these are the only written proposals from ukraine that have been presented to us in istanbul, and in the order of our reaction to these suggestions. they were in the form of a contract. and in the form of outlines of the contract, the main provisions of the main

theses, we quickly shifted these theses already to the contractual genre and handed over to our ukrainian colleagues this draft, and then they presented us with their counter ideas, which radically differed from what was done in istanbul a huge step back. well, according to leninsky in general, yes. i think that this is a step back or two steps back, but was made on the advice of our american and british colleagues, first of all, maybe the poles still played some role here, the balts, those countries that ukraine toughened its position so played back. e from those positions that we were ready to take as a basis to tell them about it and even presented a document that deployed them. in contract language they said no. no, it

's not like that. we will not write it down here for later. uh, like in that joke. and after that, we nevertheless continued to go to videoconferencing, substantiated our position, and now a week ago after another uh, videoconferencing contact we passed to them. uh, updated another version of the updated version of the treaty that already took into account their subsequent comments. well, as it usually happens, we are waiting for a week. when a couple of days ago last week, probably 5 days have passed since we conveyed our thoughts, when zelensky was asked at a press conference how he views them, because we publicly announced that

such a document went to kiev he said we got nothing . it's all. eh, not true. we are nothing seen. well, it turned out later when we asked the ukrainian negotiators again. why didn't they report the president? although it seems that he personally controls what happens at these negotiations, but they yes, but we didn’t have time for a long time, this once again shows how he himself relates to the negotiations. and when he pompously declares that he always prefers peace, mr. minister, while preparing for an interview with you. i've spoken to administration officials, and they, of course, deny that they are procrastination oriented. negotiations. they say that on the contrary, they see their task in supporting president zelensky. and that this is his position, and not the position of the united states, which determines what

ukraine says in its exchanges of views with russia, but most importantly, i would be very interested right now. this is american military assistance, increasing american military assistance to, uh, the zelensky government and washington zelensky i think it’s natural, my personal assessment, but zelensky somehow managed himself uniquely put as uh, if you want the leaders of a country who are the victim of aggression from a stronger state and at the same time, as a person who personally demonstrates, but if you want your desire to support democracy around the world. and now in washington they say that supporting zelensky with the maximum number of weapons, that this is not so much a line to

drag out the war, but this is compensation for the fact that the united states refuses to become involved in hostilities themselves, but to disagree with the will. i know already talking differently. they say zelensky must beat putin e. johnson says russia must be defeated. and this same borel borel says. uh, victory must be achieved on the battlefield, so it's not that they're somehow embarrassed about not sending soldiers and not that they want to support the new hero of the newly minted, which, uh, is portrayed as a light h- democracy, in fact, but is promoted in its state by law. the foundations of the ban on everything russian and the foundations for strengthening neo-nazism and nazi theory and practice is not about that. they

want to really try to make it so that and suddenly he succeeds. i think there are sensible people understand everything. what if zelensky manages to inflict some irreparable damage on the russians and defeat them on the battlefield, when the russians will have to uh, so uh, ask for mercy and agree to uh, much less favorable terms than they expected, this is such speculation. here they go. well, such. yes, something of mercy, it seems to me that these are commentators in congress. it's not in the white house right? well, boris johnson is almost certainly like that. this is a special case. yes, i agree, but zelensky is also a special case, they are somewhat similar, a and the ability to work for the public, and the ability to imitate a. look at the negotiations , they imitate , by the way, the negotiations now.