Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    April 26, 2022 11:00pm-11:31pm MSK

11:00 pm
they openly and officially talk about the desire to defeat russia. including a military defeat and, of course, such a policy only inflames the conflict and leads to its prolongation and escalation. and against this background, the secretary general of the united nations, antonio guterish, has sharply intensified , whose efforts, however, are still aimed not at settling the ukrainian conflict as such, but only at its humanitarian aspect , tonight antonio guterish was received by russian president vladimir putin and in the afternoon held talks with the minister of foreign affairs. you are talking about sergey lavrov. in particular , he suggested creating a contact group. un russia ukraine to provide humanitarian corridors. at the same time, it is very significant that the un secretary general does not touch upon the problem of arms supplies to the ukrainian side at all, although the relationship between the intensification of hostilities and the suffering of the civilian population is direct and obvious. but in addition to humanitarian aspects, both
11:01 pm
vladimir putin and sergey lavrov discussed issues of international order and future organization of the united nations as such, it is really the future of the world order that is at stake, and according to both vladimir putin and sergey blalarov, it is now being decided whether the new world order will be based on the un charter at all or whether it will be based on the so-called rules. listen to what the president has to say, it sounds a little strange to us, uh, some of our colleagues, when they talk about a world based on rules. we believe that the charter of the united nations and other documents accepted by this organization on and not some papers written by someone for themselves or to ensure their interests. uh, we are also surprised. uh, let's look at some of the statements of
11:02 pm
our colleagues about the fact that someone in the world is an exclusive or claims exclusive rights. and andrei andreevich well , the united states actually never hid and before the start of the ukrainian conflict, its desire to replace the world order based on the united nations with some alternative to an international order based on on actually american hegemony, because, and the so-called world based on rules is only politically correct, and the definition of american dominance of american hegemony and before the start of russia's special operation in ukraine jake sullivan and the national security adviser to the president of the united states said that the united nations is outdated and that the world needs something else. yes, i meant, just in the alliance of democracy, and under the authority of the united states and before that, the united states, too in every possible way promoted different models of alternatives.
11:03 pm
united nations organization but now it seems to me in the context of american policy towards. russia in relation to the ukrainian conflict, these attempts by the united states have sharply intensified and it is worth paying attention to how deliberately and rudely the united states is trying to put more and more countries before elections, yes, either they will join, uh, the united states and allies, or they will turn out to be on the so-called wrong side of history. so is it possible to put the question is that if the united states succeeds in this policy, otherwise it will not only restore or take a step towards the restoration of its dominance, but this will generally be the beginning of the end of the united nations organization. the un secretary general regularly visits moscow during one of his previous visits. i had the opportunity to ask him. why do you think the security council as a whole, the united nations is now in crisis, and
11:04 pm
then it gave a completely philosophical answer, which we true, today he did not share during a meeting with the president. he said that the system was founded as a result of the order of the balance that developed as a result of the great world war and the founding fathers of this order were the victorious powers that agreed on the most general framework of mutual relations, the main goal of which would be to prevent a big war between them and thinking about it. why the united nations is not brilliant or not fulfilling its obligations in the past, he shared thinking that now the world is in motion and the former balance is lost. the center of power flows to the east, the rising powers require more and more consideration of their own interests, including vital ones, they are ready to back up their demands. including force, and all of these circumstances are a challenge to the rather stable framework
11:05 pm
that has developed in the past, and in this regard, the united states acts as a revisionist power. they would like to change the system of relations that developed after the second world war to another, in the center, which they themselves would turn out to be, the idea of ​​​​replacing the un with the league of democracy or another organization that would be centered on the united states of america has been heard from the beginning of the 2000s from the bush jr. administration for the first time began to think in this vein, therefore, the current essence is not something new, but the americans are aware that the main trends are working against this their wishes, they are trying surprisingly, they are trying now to form a grand coalition around them solely through coercion. including forcing those of their distant allied partners who have their own visions of what is happening turkey india indonesia and watching what
11:06 pm
is happening, they begin to be perplexed. is it possible that the united states, which they considered the global leader as a tool, was left with only brute pressure and not even any impulses that would attract them to cooperation, and not threaten them. well, actually, i completely agree. with andrei andreevich. e. john bolton former donald trump's national security adviser, and before that, we'll prybush jr. he was deputy secretary of state and openly said that the united nations should be disbanded, that this is an obstacle to the international order, and not the basis of this international order, and, by the way, he also stated this today. uh, vladimir putin he said that he criticizes precisely those and because of the dissolution. it 's the ones it gets in the way that perform, listen absolutely, uh, it was created in its time to resolve hmm acute crises. she went through different periods
11:07 pm
of her development and most recently a few years ago. we heard that it is outdated, that it is no longer needed. this happened in those moments when she prevented someone from achieving their goals in the international arena. and vladimir alekseevich well , andrey andreevich mentioned such countries as india, turkey and and here is how committed they are to the international order with a central role. the un is on the one hand, and they are hardly interested in the restoration of american hegemony on the other hand. these countries are not presented today in the security council. he is erdogan constantly saying the world is more than five, claiming that the composition of, uh, the security council should probably include turkey and india is not a permanent member. this is security, although it obviously deserves it, that is, how underrepresented these countries are in the united nations committed to the central role of the
11:08 pm
un well, we must start with systemic issues. how badly is the united nations coping with its main task of preventing a global war throughout all these years. ah, secondly, and we are a little, most likely, not in time for perception. we are a little behind the convoy of events, and the system of international relations that existed from the forty-fifth to 1991 ended with the collapse of the soviet union, the bipolar confrontation ended, although the institutional design of this confrontation was partially preserved in the face of nato atavism and in the face of the united nations in particular. but at the same time after the ninety-first year. we have gone through such difficult stages of transformation the whole system, a in the form of e. pluralistic unipolarity, which we remember, when there was a relatively pluralism of opinions, and the transition to this new world. to which world is this a more difficult
11:09 pm
question, but it is obvious that it will be a world outside the west and it is obvious that the collapse of the americans intriguing system is happening? what did he say today? patrushev is very important. and we are moving into a completely new stage of international relations, and precisely because we are moving into it, soreness and words arise, and the elephant has always been painful, remember how the system changed to throughout history. they changed through the world wars. while once again it must be emphasized that the united nations is coping with preventing a world war, the second thing that needs to be said here is that sergey viktorovich lavrov noted that russian yes, patience and good will are not endless. russia has been and remains one of the guarantors, er, of the existing international international balance and system of world security. russia has always been a supporter of peace and security, but the west is essentially now. uh,
11:10 pm
arranges more and more direct war against us with the expressions that austin used at this meeting in ramstein. of course, they surprise, uh, and actually amaze everything that he said there, namely, about some kind of imperialism about, uh, countries. good will. eh, it can be applied with great certainty to the united states of america that they are pursuing an imperialist policy, that they are trying to subjugate europe and make their own colonies. we can , uh, continue to exchange such, a stamps, a we can talk about the future of the world order. so, in answering your question, it must be said that in the world order. the future e will definitely play a big role. uh, the powers are not the west and uh, russia in this regard has repeatedly supported the initiative to strengthen the powers not the west and in
11:11 pm
the structure of the united nations uh, there are not permanent members of the un security council uh and even sergey viktorovich lavrov spoke on this topic then when erdogan once again declared that the world is more than five, if we are going to reason revisionism of the system, then americans are undeniably the chief revisionist of the system. why are they not satisfied with the fact that they are not given the opportunity to be a hegem, and they live in this very mirror and try to control this small part of the world that is called europe, when the world is much wider and it is more obvious that india is not represented on the security council, he is constantly a member of them, and, being one of the largest economies in the world and china being slightly the largest economies in the world, are undoubtedly represented by the security council, but he claims to a large role in the system of international relations, all states see this system differently. and for example, turkey proposed to reform the security council according to two principles. the first principle is a
11:12 pm
religious principle, it seemed to us that in 1648 it was a channel in the summer, but no, but turkey proposes to transform it, according to the religious principle and according to the territorial one, and these proposals will be more and more, but fundamentally important. and that these proposals would be discussed in a peaceful and calm atmosphere. with respect for national interests and values others, and multipolar versions are not suitable for the united states, and they have no experience of coexisting on an equal footing within a multipolar world, because when the world in the previous era was unipolar, the united states pursued a policy of isolationism. they did not participate then in the europa center. even today, balance sheet, the united states is indeed doing everything, and in order to prevent the final formation of a multipolar world, to restore its hegemony, and as confirmation of this, today's demonstrative
11:13 pm
to illustrate this, and there was that very meeting of loyd austin, secretary of defense of the united states at the american rammstein air base in germany, the main one of the most important places one of the most important places in the presence of the military presence of the united states in europe and. a. a lot of things were said at this meeting. and, and vladimir alekseevich has already said, and in some of austin’s statements, he stated that, indeed, and for russia, american policy is to defeat russia, and for ukraine to win, uh, during the military conflict, and he said that such meetings, like today, are dedicated to. coordination of the supply of weapons to ukraine, and heavy weapons to ukraine will be held monthly attention every month. that is, this is already a clear confirmation that the united states is working to prolong the
11:14 pm
conflict as much as possible, and also this meeting in ramstein was a development of yesterday's blitz visit by lloyd austin and secretary of state blinkin e to kiev, ah, business cards, which, according to most western media and analysts, symbolized an important turn in at least rhetoric. or maybe the policy of the united states and this turn lies in the fact that the united states began to openly talk about the ultimate goal of their policy, yes, and this ultimate goal is to weaken as much as possible, and to inflict defeat on russia, and defeat yes, and this is officially spoken of and openly, but uh, it was this aspect that this very turn was emphasized in his today's article, and very influential popular. uh, new york times columnist david senger. let's listen. when secretary
11:15 pm
of defense lloyd austin declared at the end of a secret visit to ukraine that america's goal was for russia to be so weakened that it would no longer be able to invade neighboring states, he acknowledged the transformation of the conflict from a battle for control of ukraine into a more direct confrontation. washington and moscow in the long run, america's stated true strategic goal is to strengthen what is being said president vladimir putin's belief that the war was actually caused by the west's desire to stifle the russian government and destabilize its government, when austin stated that the us goal was to weaken the russian armed forces, other biden administration officials began to speak more frankly about the future they see they see years of uninterrupted a struggle for power and influence with moscow that is reminiscent of what president john f. kennedy called a long battle in the twilight of the cold war. ivan alekseevich well
11:16 pm
david senger recalled this jfk quote. another famous speech of his at american university 8 months after the caribbean crisis comes to mind, where jfk said that it is absolutely unacceptable to put nuclear powers in a position of choice between defeat and, uh, nuclear war. yes, and today austin has once again openly said that the goal of the united states is to defeat russia. here is my question. why is the united states convinced that they have nothing for this policy it will be that they are in such absolute safety and can do. that's all before pressing the nuclear button. or is there a transition to a direct conventional military clash with russia . after all, if we are in a state of hybrid war, then russia can respond. and not only sarmatians. russia has other ways to respond to the united states. and i completely agree with the
11:17 pm
statement in your question that the united states is confident that in this complex interdependent world they have found such a position and such a diplomatic political formulation of their position, when they themselves can do whatever they want, but no one can reach them. in this case, her allies cannot scatter, but because, as it seems to them, the only way for them to reach out. this is nuclear war. russia consistently says that the nuclear option. this is what we rule out a nuclear war russia does not consider as some kind of reasonable decision existing in the world. e in a world of contradictions from my point of view. ah, the united states are mistaken. i want to emphasize. this is what we have been seeing for the last 2 months. the discontinuous
11:18 pm
steps of western countries, the imposition of sanctions on the supply of weapons to ukraine, the political incitement of ukraine, inciting it towards russia, all kinds of encouragement. uh, in their crazy policy, russia has practically made no serious retaliatory steps. that is, russia reserves the right to take many retaliatory steps, but only the time the place of these retaliatory steps will be chosen by russia independently and, as it seems to me, how realization is beginning to come in the united states now, and i feel like it was yesterday. uh, in blinkin and austin's speech, you can understand the tone of their introduction . in this way, they, uh, understand that they have already entered some territory. and where, like in the
11:19 pm
strugatsky zone, they will definitely fly something from somewhere, but they can no longer say exactly where from where and what. despite the current points of view, the united states is very nervous about restraint and composure, russia because then again, if russia, uh, well, many in the west perceive russia as a very emotional power, that we are always, uh, we say a lot of things like that, and then we do little . in this case, they suspect that they are facing exactly the opposite. russia is very restrained in its statements, but clearly holds some serious fists that can, uh, from somewhere in the darkness unknown to them. all of a sudden, uh, all of a sudden, it doesn’t matter economic political or uh, or even military and from my point of view in still time the united states uh experience great discomfort from this
11:20 pm
uncertainty from the fact that russia reserves the right to do a lot in e. further and try to probe in various ways. what is on russia's mind? and what is she going to do with e? that is, how to swing here. eh, here's the russian er russian position and bring russia out of russia from this restraint to some great emotionality. it doesn't work out at all . so i would just like to emphasize what ivan alekseevich said about the contrast between the nervousness of the united states and the strategic calmness of russia's strategic restraint is undoubtedly connected with that. and that the united states is losing strategically, and not only in ukraine, but in the world as a whole, and russia will not tolerate any defeat, of course, russia is winning in ukraine and again. in a global context, and therefore, she can afford this a
11:21 pm
strategic restraint. we will continue in just a few moments. that is, he accidentally drowned in a case of suicide. what difference does it make that adam lank book killed him, really historical figure his autobiography will be world publishing events. according to the documents, mr. lamps ordered the illegal use of british special forces to capture four suspected al-qaeda terrorists in pakistan and then transfer them to the cia for interrogation. oh no killer. name at least one lang decision in 10 years as prime minister that would not be in the interests of the united states kidnapping to torture me from this sentimental brad and he is macgregor he will retire here,
11:22 pm
having received his father and russia and will tell you and this black court. yes, everyone would go. the film of the novel polanski phantom may 1st on first i have always been an optimist ; this is what we live in, we are optimistic about the future, so that it does not bring the end. thanks to millions, how the sponge absorbs various bacteria and toxins, helping to eliminate the unpleasant symptoms of
11:23 pm
vtb, look for advertising that will help you get a free vtb multicard, it's right in front of you get the opportunity to easily pay for the purchases of partners, everything will work out, we are waiting for you to visit because you love the bar. picnic plus is new movies and tv shows every week on kinopoisk plus millions of tracks for any mood on yandex.music plus my wave is a new recommendation system that knows what you like and free yandex.plus flight. subscription for many pluses. we are investing in the future in achieving safety. we invest in our
11:24 pm
children. this is our strength, invest in the future, spb believe in people. discover profitable shopping. collect your image on ozon t-shirts from the spring collection from 299 rubles. and sneakers from 1.199 rubles. only one registration on the financial services and a lot of banks at my service, what to say stop has become more fun? a billion rubles from the russian lotto is a gift to each participant, the minimum winnings are two times more soon for tickets. catch a discount in the check get a 25% discount coupon in magnit family and
11:25 pm
magnit extra vtb team from the first stitch to the sewing workshop from a tiny sprout to a blooming one garden business changes over the years damir digs in a matter of days. but when you have a reliable bank with you, you can always rely on it. it's for sure that we have put together a set of special offers to support and develop your business depositing cash for just one ruble a current account and a business card attractive deposit rates and other offers for business dot vtb.ru vtb help with business. create see you.
11:26 pm
lenta has everything for summer cottages and gardens up to 50% discount bank of the year in russia tinkoff he is one of a kind. there is a big game on the air, and today at the rammstein airbase there is a meeting of the united states and its allies to build up military assistance to ukraine , and this meeting again confirmed the course of the united states not only for the maximum delay, but also for the so-called horizontal escalation, but of the conflict, and also once again demonstrated
11:27 pm
such a feature of the current policy of the collective west as strategic frivolity. this is henry casenger's term. that is, when the parties being in full confidence in your safety. and that nothing bad will happen, they take such steps, which in the end can lead to a world conflict, and a, at least two statements that were made today at the rammstein air base speak in favor of this, firstly, the statement of the deputy minister of defense of great britain james hippie that ukraine has the full right to launch military strikes deep into russian territory, yes, but the russian ministry of defense immediately, but answered that, and the decision-making centers in kiev, e, also can instantly become targets for russian military strikes, huh? secondly, the same united states secretary of defense floyd austin stated
11:28 pm
that nato remains fully committed to the open door policy. moreover, this open door policy applies not only to sweden and finland, which are likely to receive an invitation, but to joining nato at the upcoming summit in madrid, but also for ukraine for ukraine . to nato and this actually explains yesterday's statement by the speaker of the verkhovna rada of ukraine that they do not intend to make amendments. andrei andreevich's own constitution is precisely strategic frivolity. why is the united states, uh, everything, doing this, right? it seems to me that russia's special operation in ukraine in itself is already irrefutable evidence that russia is ready to use military force in case of violation of its red lines. here we are dealing simply with a
11:29 pm
colossal regular, and a violation of the red lines russia for what it is done in other words. you can call it a game in a casino for other people's money for ukrainian money, in fact. here are all these pompous meetings, loud statements, resonant press conferences. they are taking place in a context where russia's sentencing positions at the next stage of the settlement will be completely different. what they were like in the first phase of the crisis and the ukrainian side will inevitably turn out to be the injured party russia, it seems to me, ivan alekseevich quite rightly noted advantage in terms of. e strategic choice of the moment and means of defeat, but does not cease to own the initiative in this crisis. this is the pace that russia offers to its opponents. he is actually extremely uncomfortable,
11:30 pm
he forces them to constantly improvise, like giving birth to soap bubbles. ideas that one way or another we are inevitable. so, here we win a little more win. and ultimately it's for the news cycle mode. this might work well. that is, we are with you, let's say we are discussing, yes, but how much this affects the state of affairs on the battlefields does not affect in any way. and when we eventually come to the point where we need to sum up the accounts and it becomes clear that ukraine will pay for these high-profile american statements e. here. i'd like to see what minister austin would then say to the ukrainian leader, whoever he was at the time, and i guess what compelled them, to this pompous and private public speech, the fact that they can't afford those harsh decisive steps, which they keep promising and promising, because they realize what russia's response to

22 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on