the number of combat-ready troops and most importantly, whether they decide now to take them away from odessa and nikolaev, because there is already a front line between kherson and nikolaev, and so on. that is, let's try to imagine all this. as far as this is all informational, a distracting maneuver, as some people think, or the possibility of some other military center, as others think. the point is that the problem is with transnistria. they did not arise yesterday, nor the day before yesterday, it has existed for a long time , but it exists precisely in the plans americans, as well as some kind of operation to contain russia, i have repeatedly cited information that the ren corporation considered this territory, which they had there, yes, in which it can be solved only by military means, yes, either military intervention or a military coup. and let me remind you that when my sandu came to power, 14% of the population of transnistria voted for her. that is, already on the territory of pridnestrovie there were the very forces that contributed to the fact that these

sabotage groups calmly drove through. with rpg almost to the center of the city and struck such people were always there, well, they were not always there, yes, if we begin to evaluate the capabilities of pridnestrovie from a military point of view, then there are about 300 units of military equipment - these are 100 tanks 200 armored personnel carriers of infantry fighting vehicles if the complex is e, artillery rocket launchers . there are several complexes against air defense, there are about 5,000. this is a permanent contingent and they can recruit 35,000 reservists. they are the pmr , this is the pmr yes, our group. well, our 5,000 is our 5,000, and besides, you need to understand that a big some of these 5,000 are citizens of the pmr with russian passports, therefore, in principle, they are russians. but it is they, of course, who support our fleet aviation, which has developed in common, and the military operation

is possible, because we control the airspace and the fleet is still our own. and with weapons systems it can support that defense, if all of a sudden , uh, some military units of ukraine try? do you suddenly evaluate this one as real or as a distraction? here we all observed with you information about what should to supply heavy weapons for the military of ukraine, especially those that are required in the east, but so far there is no information that something heavy , especially of a western type, has reached its destination, of course, some are destroyed along the way, but most, as the americans say, we do not know, where to wear. i suspect that this is just the part that can be concentrated against the dniester moldavian republic, that is, those self-propelled guns, those bmps but those tanks, they can be concentrated just there from

space, we don’t see it, the point is that here is the technique. they move it, e, taking into account. uh, including the presence of our satellite constellation and do not forget that the entire satellite reconnaissance constellation of the united states of america, in principle, also works under them. these are the movements in small groups in order not to attract disguised as civilian cargo. can be carried out can be transferred to the tank trailers. and you will never suspect that this trailer is driving there, because the cosmos will determine that some kind of truck is driving. and what is there under the tank? you do not understand the width of the coach passes passes. i never tried to carry tanks. the only thing. you can notice that the trailer is a little different, but if you remember what it means that some of the trailers were transferred to ukraine as a humanitarian - well, this military assistance is precisely western-style trailers that can carry heavy, a armored vehicles.

i think it's just these thrillers. here i am transport logistics for the transfer - for the covert transfer of troops, by the way, about uh, since you're talking about it we started talking, uh, we have discussed this many times with other experts. this was also discussed for two weeks. as they say actively discussed about our first not working. and now, it seems, work has begun on the railway infrastructure. these are the blows inflicted on these traction substations. and how e. well, including a strike on this bridge across e, liman, and so on. as far as you think, today this is enough to critically slow down this railway infrastructure. or this needs to be continued and increased, you know, here are the strikes against traction substations. this is a temporary measure. that is, it will slow down, uh, transfers for a while until then. until the traction substation is restored, therefore, it will be necessary to repeat aga as

a preventive work, but if these traction substations. they continue to be in a broken state. and the fact that they are turned off from the infrastructure is enough for these transfers. well, the redeployment of these troops by rail stops or is necessary, anyway, something else. the thing is that you need to understand that the amount of equipment supplied should approximately correspond to the amount of equipment being removed. that is, if you have this amount, you do not have time to supply this equipment, destroy it more than we supply it, then all these supplies become useless, that is, you need hundreds of tanks tomorrow, and you will bring them only in a month. a month later. and you 'll lose half of it along the way. this means that it does not keep pace with the pace of the other. that is, we destroy faster and more military equipment than it comes to the line of combat representation of this military equipment. and we're wasting ammunition. as i understand it, the ammunition is all the same, of course. well, they will be produced,

they will be replenished, and so on. is it that there is such a concept of the ratio of the price of ammunition and the target right? yes, if you just, for example, hit a tank with a caliber, this is not the most successful target. if you if you are caught in a cluster of tanks, uh, i'm talking about savory substances. and also personnel. this is a good goal, that is, you are one let's destroy more ammunition, therefore, the tactics that our ministry of defense used. it just consisted in determining the places of accumulation. uh-huh and makei dealing maximum damage to him. then the price of ammunition for everything is fully justified. but if you are, for example, just an ammunition strike on a railway track, which in 2 days will be restored by the repairmen of the railway track, then you would simply waste your ammo supply. it should bring maximum damage to the enemy, so that this here blows were very sensitive for him. this blow on the bridge that went

through la- it is sensitive, so it is sensitive, we even repeated it so that it is already like that. destroyed so that it was difficult to restore. or maybe it will not be recoverable at all, that is, here the questions are always the assessment of strikes and the planning of strikes. understood? well, actually , from the point of view. at the beginning, i said about this both infrastructure and, uh, the fact that this delivery infrastructure must somehow stop work. and i said this at the beginning, after all, apparently , but against our cities on our territory. today there was an attempt to use bayraktar drones, and these beyraktars obviously did not fly there under their own power. this means that they were delivered somewhere in the border regions in the form of the limsk or chernihiv region, depending on where they needed to fly with them, the control stations arrived, because they should be located from the launch site. he starts there with some small. yes, even the highway. is it possible there range of combat use, can up to 400 km to

400 km. it is clear, this, by the way, to the question of the price of gestures. good will. in chernihiv and kievskaya, therefore , usually, well, that is, such drones are equated with medium-range missiles, but when they have a maximum range, and so on. well, now, uh, the question is the answer to which i don't know how much you can give. uh, since it's, well, i don't know how public it is. as a matter of fact, uh, our air defenses worked today. as i understand it perfectly well, but having knocked down these very baraktars, but, uh, we are talking about the fact that there are still some american uh on the way, the reaper, in my opinion, this is called a cooler point than this is also a drone, but let's say it is much compared to the bayraktar. in terms of its characteristics, it is better and it has a larger spectrum of weapons, which it can, uh, carry the vision of our air defense counteracting it, but the

fact is that you understand that there is no pilot inside it for any drone who cannot determine what it has already been illuminated, and the radiation station of the anti-aircraft missile system leads to escort can bring down the only thing that can help the drone operator. if someone there, for example, for intelligence, knows where the air defense systems are located, he can build a car for him now news has come, just now that one of the drones shot down over the kursk region was reconnaissance, that is, they are probably doing just that informs the authorities. kursk region. they think that such means when such strikes occur, it means that a reconnaissance drone is from a strike, but it differs in optics by an electronic means. that is, reconnaissance, he sees better further. it can go, determine the target, that is, it gives out coordinates on it, and the striker needs to come to these coordinates and simply release his deadly cargo. whether it's an air-to-earth missile or

some glide munition, so they usually work in pairs, because, uh, reconnaissance drones. he still needs to determine the means, for example, air defense, which can interfere with the work of an attack drone; such tactics, for example, have been observed in mountainous karabakh, that is, drones hung there. scouts who monitored air defense systems. and the barrage of ammunition and shock barren ones were the so-called waiting area. as soon as they convinced that, for example, an air defense system was not working, then they struck or destroyed this air defense system by other means, for example, missile systems, or artillery systems. here, in fact. we are talking about this. well, i think that everything that you are now explaining is, of course, our specialists who are engaged in our air defense. in this area, where now along the border on the other side of our troops there are no within, so here are the gestures. yes, goodwill, but we'll move on now. e to talk about the fact that we have

talked about this many times, that what is happening. uh, on the ground fighting. one way or another , it is reflected in what is happening in this international geopolitical and political rhetoric. this is what we were discussing now, that ours began to work on the infrastructure and these huge ones are gnawed here, and fortifications and losses ukraine is really huge, although show-offs. all the same, the arrestovich is not getting smaller, and for 5 billion a month, why not beat up the show-off. here, in fact, the question is how this is reflected in the rhetoric of those who actually stand behind ukraine, not only in this very rammstein, but because it largely depends on what is in the heads of the owners who pay for all this calls, how far all these zelensky arresters will go or not go and so on, because these are puppets you need to look at what is in the head of the puppeteers. now after let's deal with advertising right now. that is, he accidentally

drowned in a case of suicide. what difference does this book kill him? adam lank, a real historical figure, his autobiography will be a worldwide publishing event. based on the documents of mr lamps, he ordered the illegal use of british special forces to capture four suspected al-qaeda terrorists in pakistan and then transfer them to the cia for interrogation. killer. name at least one decision of the lang for 10 years in office, a prime minister who would not be in the interests of usa pierce brosnan i never followed anyone's orders everything i did i did because i thought it was right even supporting illegal kidnappings to torture me from this sentimental brad june mcgregor he will retire here, having received a father and russia and will tell you to this black court. yes, all the film of the novel would go, polonsky ghost on may 1 on first i have always been an optimist, we

live. we urgently looked to the future with optimism, lest it bring the end. when the nerves are on edge, magnelis b6 is needed, reinforced magnesium with vitamin b6, magneli with b6 is up to 30% more affordable than a similar imported drug. get a free vtb multicard; right in front of you, you will get the opportunity to easily pay for purchases of partners and everything will turn out to be profitable shopping. take your image to ozon t-shirts from the spring collection from 299 rubles. and sneakers from

1.199 rubles. watch all the videos, create. we are renaissance credit bank for those who are looking for simple and affordable banking products. why you don't have to go to the office. apply for a debit card online. main with high interest on the balance and receive 1,000 rubles. two renaissance credit banks of all kinds are all just talking about the benefits of a savings banquet, sour cream house in the village for only 79.90 per meter savings banquet. order the vtb team from the first stitch to the sewing workshop from a tiny sprout. before a blooming garden, business changes over the years, and the world sometimes in a

matter of days. but when you have a reliable bank with you, you can always rely on it. we have put together a set of special offers to support and grow your business. depositing cash in just one ruble calculation and business card attractive deposit rates and other offers for business dot vtb.ru vtb help with business. cinema 1tv represents life was such a situation where a good person can go to the crime he comes out. i didn't do anything to him personally. only,

unfortunately, not about me will throw put us alone, please. good morning alexander ivanovich, everything is in order. go movie 1tv presents the local kupchino gromov did not share with his son a certain urban ritual anfis is all over. it is now to sing. river get ready. he us had no practice. vanya, she

gives birth to the purity of the fetal heartbeat can lead to difficult for a temporary stop of the birth de? wan let's try. only the people got sick. it ’s just that, finally, a doctor has a program that will show us, we continue to work live before advertising, we began to talk about what is natural behind the ukrainian government behind the kiev regime are those who are not their first, not the second, not the third year and are growing a roof. this is taking advantage. all this is quite obvious, but all this evidence forces us to say every time that depending on what happens here directly on earth, the rhetoric of these same puppeteers depends. in my opinion. maybe i'm wrong.

some interesting points appeared in this rhetoric of his americans, and europeans. let's try to analyze them. well, let's start with the americans, because they run the show there. here's a blinkin us secretary of state who is speaking before an international committee. on the one hand, congressional affairs says that, as it were, sanctions with with a margin of opportunity to put pressure on russia, they are doing well. let's listen. engaging with our allies to put sanctions pressure on russia and continue to make every effort to tighten the noose around putin's neck do you think we can maintain unity among the allies? i think yes, yes, we have an amazing solidarity by now, a lot of work has been put into this. the task now is to ensure that we can not only maintain sanctions against the russian federation, but also increase them. i believe that we we will do it. that is, on the one hand. everything, as if cheerfully, as if we were going, we continue to press and press and we will press from one side to the other. as you remember, this whole story

came to an end before february 24 because we demanded their consent to the neutral status of ukraine as a guarantee to us that the issue of its admission to nato would not be considered and would be closed, and we were told that this issue was not even considered and not discussed. and suddenly these people who are so sure of the margin of pressure on us. in the same mouth of the same blinkin voice this thesis, please. negotiations between zelenskiy and the russians have included a discussion that ukraine could take a neutral status. so this was part of the discussion and this is a sovereign decision of ukraine, we senator will not be greater ukrainians than the ukrainians themselves, these decisions will have to be made by them. our goal is to ensure that the ukrainians have the opportunity to repel russian aggression and strengthen their position at the negotiating table. and here

i have a question, that is, on the one hand the person says that we have every opportunity to put pressure to put pressure to choke there to tighten. and what else is in his head, but on the other hand, the question of the neutral status of ukraine, as it were, if the ukrainians themselves want to discuss, then, well, like, let them discuss it. it seems to me that this is some kind of new thesis and we need to understand where all the cheese suddenly came from, a fighter for this to a large extent, of course, absolutely slyness about the fact that they do not want to be great ukrainians. they just want to be great ukrainian ukrainians. in terms of acceptance solutions. but, when they are ready to discuss this thesis for the ukrainians, because of which 2 months ago. three four. it all started. what's this? well , look. how to look at the truly neutral status of ukraine on the one hand, but again for our national security for our strategic interests. it is vital on the other hand. i just want to remind you that on february 24, a war began, a special military operation. ukraine was not part of nato and

nato said over and over again that yes, yes, yes, we we will perceive, but maybe sometime in 5-10-15 years. many countries are not ready, that is, in fact, this cat in a poke, which is ukraine well, at least for the western world. they are trying to sell this pig in a poke once again a topic with, uh, a neutral status for americans , it is very profitable to rock it again and again. why because in fact? well, again, if you look at the situation on the ground, and in its current form, no matter what ukraine after a successful end there, a special military operation will not the current ukraine has naturally survived, it will not be part of the western world, but this is a lot of deep conviction. you can argue with me, at least within those limits for sure. in general, i believe that the borders will soon change even more radically . proceeding from this, it is already important now. reset question next good. we are basically ready. and in principle, we won't mind if the ukrainians have, uh, neutral status, so

. so refuse many things that, it seems to me, are no longer acceptable to us, therefore, what glinkin does, he does it as a diplomat, in this case, effective, brilliant, he shows that ukraine seems to be how to decide on its own about a neutral status, but we- then we all know that it is the americans who will bargain for this neutral status to the last. well, it is clear that using life, it is clear that by pumping weapons to ukraine and so on, the third important point about just this issue. is she ready ukraine and go further? here i get the impression that a month ago e before everyone. eh, these events were not ready. we remember zelensky who spoke. well, he directly addressed our president and said the general status. well , let's sit down and discuss, why not, he said this in a not very such way, yes, i don't agree in the state, but the very fact that this issue was in the

discourse of the ukrainian authorities at that time. yes, this fact is on the face now after this center for coordination and assistance has been created at ramshtein. after the british announce the supply of cruise missiles, and long-range artillery, which is very important, can hit targets at a distance. here are dear senior comrades. we will not let the war lie 70 100. or maybe even 300 km. but if , after all, a kilometer, if the defense ministers, and the uk says that you can and should use it for this and in this sense, then this is the same neutral hundred. for the americans, it seems to me that at the moment the strategic goal of depleting russia is unacceptable, as stated by okin, about what? actually blinkin said in these conditions it does not matter if they have a neutral status or if there is no glare bluffing. let's, let's have a brilliant blinken bluff. and then let's

understand, what does a barrel do from a barrel, probably depends much less than from a blinkin, because the blinken is an american secretary of state, and barrel is a brussels official. let him be in charge of es diplomacy, but nonetheless. here is a barrel for you now, at the moment that everything is as it is on e, here is today, please. if we do not decide to remain in constant tension or conflict, this is certainly not the option favored by the eu we will need to find ways to reorganize the relationship between the eu and russia and agree on security guarantees and mechanisms to ensure the peaceful coexistence of the eu the us and nato responded cautiously to the treaties and letters proposed to russia from our side the message was clear. we are ready to discuss all aspects of security, including russian references to the indivisibility of security, but this cannot be done. while hostilities are underway, the third one, and i fix

your attention on his words on our part, the message was clear. we are ready to discuss all aspects of security, including russian references to the indivisibility of security, he says, i remind you on april 26. this is the same person who said that april 9th. we all then paid attention to this. on april 9, he spoke the texts in a completely different key. he says that this war will be won on the battlefield, extra, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. now the question arises from this point of view. uh, there's a financier, an economist, and so on. here, looking at this political cake your flair tells you. here is a change in the position of the barrel. this is the result of his realistic assessment of how everything is happening on earth, and therefore he rides on the concept or is it just a change of tactics. eh, let's say bargaining. well, conditional, uh, there is a stick for a conditional

carrot. that is just a change of rhetoric. these are fundamentally different questions. no, i think that the west clearly realized that the victory of ukraine is, or otherwise in this war is impossible. yeah, this is the time and it is fundamental for them to fix the situation in at least those positions that were originally declared by russia, the donetsk luhansk republic and crimea, and are even ready to agree with the current land corridor, it is fundamentally important for them, but to keep the historical successor to these lands, because it will be recorded in all documents of ukraine in principle, they will 100% pump international forces in mind there, because what they told us about the strengthening is clearly was not built with the help of ukrainian engineers. yes , these houses here and it is clear that the specialists worked at a different level. and if from the point of view of the economy, then it is necessary to say, probably, nevertheless, there are problems. we will also speak well today. she is very connected with this change, the rhetoric is also very noticeable, we are also connected

with the territorial principle, because if russia solves all the tasks set in this demilitarization operation and before nationalization and takes control of the ukrainian gts in one way or another, then then the northern streams are not needed either. oh, that is, how the war began and the conflict, it can end here. and here, here, yes, here, in fact , we will talk about gas separately, because this is also the same thing, but still this change of rhetoric. uh, barrels now, but the change in rhetoric is barrels. it 's still that it's hmm it's like an attempt, that's it. we, on the other hand, tried to negotiate with the russians in a good way, but not very much with the war, or is he already proceeding from the fact that it’s not working out very well here and therefore we need to move on to another issue, and then the question arises. and that for him the twenty-sixth was not so much that was not on april 9, which, in fact, during these 17 days then it changed, if this is the version in my opinion, this is two. and two europes are two realities that sometimes

collide in one head of this respected polar diplomat. and you can say that on the one hand, this approach, which was now cited in the plot, when e blinken said, our goal is to tighten the noose around putin’s neck and the british, the americans have been talking throughout last week, that our task is the military victory of ukraine, the military defeat of russia, but on the other hand, there are very serious debates in europe that this is the wrong approach. just yesterday they sent me a link from germany for three minutes. she had a very interesting story on a german tv channel and then they sent a virtually verbatim translation. there is a military analyst general, a former military adviser, merkel he said the following. what do you think? what is it? the nuclear power needs to be

defeated. do you really want it proclaim your goals. you are not afraid for tomorrow for yourself. well, in general, very much, and then there was a phrase to remember and russia - this is not iraq the messiah or the southwest. here, yes, there he called four countries to hell. you see, how, uh, it was interesting at that moment to observe the reaction of opponents, and on the screen a girl participated in a virtual discussion in this discussion, they all counted such inexperienced girls in the green party and she made such eyes. how is it that he encroached on the holy the victories of ukraine, but serious people in germany, serious people in other european states and half of the brain soared, they also understand that half of the brain was not allowed to say, this is a terrible force, a terrible force, it is impossible to proclaim military goals. a nuclear power must negotiate with it. and here

we read on. turn on everything, including russian references to the indivisibility of security, you will have to slander someday. it means that the course of events pushed him to this, the situation, then uh they uh, every day uh with each small, but irreversible repulsive success of russia they are well aware that ukraine will lose such. and here it is important to know for sure whether this is already an attempt to shoot some kind of diplomatic straw under a possible one, but a failure, or is it still such an attempt. excuse me, divert attention. what do i want to say? e the most famous hippie james, who said he allowed ukraine to bomb. eh, russia is the second - this was a phrase he had like, but he was asked. and who will be responsible for this? well, of course, we will not be responsible for the country not the driver of the rocket. and that which