Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    April 28, 2022 1:30am-2:01am MSK

1:30 am
but in exchange for this 1 2 3 in exchange for this, you give up the land corridor to crimea in return. uh, so, give up on many things that, it seems to me, are already unacceptable for us, therefore, what blinkin does, he does it as a diplomat, in this case, effective and brilliant, he shows that ukraine, it seems, how to decide on their own about the neutral status, but we all know that it is the americans who will bargain for this neutral status to the last. well it's clear that using life it's clear that pumping weapons to ukraine and so on, the third important point about just this question. is ukraine itself ready to move on? here i get the impression that a month ago e before everyone. eh, these events were not ready. we remember zelensky who spoke. well, he actually addressed directly to our president and said the general status. well, let's sit down and discuss, why, yes, i remember him, true, he did not say this in a not very such way. yes, i agree, but the very fact
1:31 am
that this issue was in the discourse then this fact is obvious to the ukrainian authorities. now , after this center for coordination and assistance has been created on ramstein, in ramstein. after the british announce the supply of cruise missiles, and long-range artillery, which is very important , can hit targets at a distance. here is a dear senior comrade. we will not let the war lie 70 100. or maybe even 300 km. but if, after all, a kilometer, if the minister of defense, and the uk says that you can and should use it for this and in this sense, here is the one the most neutral status for the americans, it seems to me, is not acceptable at the moment, the strategic goal is to deplete russia, as oki said, on what? blinkin actually stated in these conditions. it doesn't matter if they are neutral or glare is bluffing. let's do it brilliantly. blinken is
1:32 am
bluffing, and then let's understand, what the barrel does from the barrel probably depends much less than from the pancake, because the blinken-american secretary of state and the barrel is a brussels official. let him be responsible for eu diplomacy, but nonetheless. there you are the barrel is now at the moment that everything is as it is at uh, here is today, please. if we do not decide to remain in constant tension or conflict, this is certainly not the option favored by the eu we will need to find ways to reorganize the relationship between the eu and russia and agree on security guarantees and mechanisms to ensure peaceful coexistence of the eu the us and nato responded cautiously to treaties and letters proposed to russia from our side, the message was clear we are ready to discuss all aspects of security, including russian references to the indivisibility of security, but this cannot be done. while hostilities are underway, the third one, and i fix
1:33 am
your attention on his words on our part, the message was clear. we are ready to discuss all aspects of security, including russian references to the indivisibility of security, he says, i remind you on april 26. this is the same person who on april 9th. we all then paid attention to this. on april 9 , he spoke the texts in a completely different key. he said that this is a war won on the battlefield, extra, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. now the question arises from the point of view of this view. uh, there's a financier, an economist, and so on. here. uh, looking at this political cake, what's your guess? here is a change in the position of the barrel. this is the result of his realistic assessment of how everything is happening on earth, and therefore he rides on the concept or is it just a change of tactics. eh, let's say bargaining. well, conditional uh, there is a stick on a conditional
1:34 am
carrot. that is just a change of rhetoric. it fundamentally different questions. no, i think that the west has clearly realized that the victory of ukraine in one way or another in this war is impossible. yeah, this is the time and it is fundamental for them to fix the situation in at least those positions that were originally declared by russia, the donetsk luhansk republic and crimea, and are even ready to agree with the current land corridor, it is fundamentally important for them, but to keep the historical successor to these lands, because it principle will be fixed in all documents of ukraine. they will pump up 100% international means there international forces, because what they told us about the fortification was clearly not built with the help of ukrainian engineers. yes , these houses here and it is clear that the specialists worked at a different level. and if from the point of view of the economy, then it is necessary to say, probably, nevertheless, there are problems. we will also speak well today. she, she is very connected with this
1:35 am
change, rhetoric is also very noticeably connected with the territorial principle, because if russia solves all the tasks set in this operation by demilitarization and before nationalization and takes control of the ukrainian gts in one way or another, then the northern streams are not needed either. oh, that is, how the war began and the conflict, it can end here. and here, here, yes, here, in fact , we will talk about gas separately, because this is also the same thing, but still this change of rhetoric. uh, barrel now, but the change of rhetoric is all the same, what is it? it's like an attempt, that's it. we, on the other hand, tried to negotiate with the russians in a good way, but the war was not very good, or is he already proceeding from the fact that that it does not work out very well here, and therefore we must move on to another question, and then a question arises. and that for him the twenty-sixth was not so much that was not on april 9, which, in fact, during these 17 days then it changed, if this is the version in my opinion, this is two. and two europes are two
1:36 am
realities that sometimes collide in one head of this respected bipolar diplomat. uh, you can say so european bipolar diplomat, on the one hand, this approach, which was just cited in in the story, when e blinken said, our goal is to tighten the noose around the neck of putin and the british, the americans have been saying for the whole last week that our task is the military victory of ukraine, the military defeat of russia, but on the other hand, there are very serious debates in europe that this is the wrong approach . just yesterday they sent me a link from germany for three minutes. she had a very interesting story on a german tv channel and then they actually sent a literal translation. there military analyst general, former military adviser, merkel he said the following. what do you think? what's this?
1:37 am
the nuclear power needs to be defeated. you really want it to proclaim your goals. you are not afraid for tomorrow for yourself. well , in general, very much, and then there was a phrase to remember and russia - this is not iraq the messiah or the southwest. here, yes, there he called four countries to hell. you see, how, uh, it was interesting. at that moment, to observe the reaction of opponents, and on the screen, a girl participated in a virtual discussion in this discussion, they all counted inexperienced girls in the green party and she makes such eyes. how is it that he encroached on the holy agha, how can we not wish for the military victory of ukraine, but serious people in germany, serious people in other european countries and half of the brain soared, they also understand that half the sea is impossible, they said that terrible power terrible power cannot
1:38 am
proclaim goals military the expression of a nuclear power must be negotiated with it, and here we read further. turn on everything, turn on russian references to the indivisibility of security. someday will have to to slander that the course of events prompted him to do this, then they, uh, every day, uh, with each small, but irreversible, repulsive success of russia. they perfectly understand that ukraine will lose such. and here it is important to know for sure whether this is already an attempt to shoot some kind of diplomatic straw under a possible one, and a failure, or is it still an attempt. excuse me, divert attention. what do i want to say? and the most famous is james the hippie, who said he allowed ukraine to bomb. uh, russia is the second - this is a phrase from he was like, but he was asked. and who will be responsible for this? well, of course, not we will now be the country not the driver of the rocket. and the one that she
1:39 am
launched, that is, he immediately said, let us abandon ukraine, let it fight, and we ourselves will see aside what will come of it this is the laying of straw, but it seems to me, nevertheless at this stage, these are also attempts somehow hide the preparation and pumping of weapons. that is, they did not reconcile to the end, they did not reconcile to the end. and here's another from the point of view of e, whether their changes positions, or well, one question haunts me . here, look. here you come to moscow , you bottle, but a person whose position is a-a. today he is already in ukraine, whose position involves the discussion of world problems and, if you like, judges the world. and i can’t understand how a person who came to discuss the fate of the world, why is he discussing the most difficult situation of the fate of millions of people, a huge number of cities that are, well, also in a not the easiest situation. he
1:40 am
devotes such a time and time to one single city on territory of this country. listen, we understand what a difficult situation in mariupol russia has announced the creation of corridors, which, however, are not used. we are ready to inform ukraine and russia together with the red cross to assess the situation in 2-3 days. this will allow the evacuation of those who want to evacuate. a very large area of ​​the city has been destroyed. many people stay there and are in a difficult situation. they want to leave the city, someone wants to go to the russian federation, someone wants to go to the territory controlled by the ukrainian authorities, we will be ready. to use all our resources to work together with the authorities of russia and ukraine in order to create this opportunity to guarantee the evacuation of these persons. now look, now i understand that maybe i got stuck on this, but here i am, well, how to bring up education like that.
1:41 am
i can’t understand what kind of forces these same puppeteers should work with the un secretary general so that he discusses the individual, mariupol, the individual evacuation of individual civilians. after all, he didn’t say a word, they don’t know about kharkov, they don’t know about it. there some more kharkiv excuse me much more than uh. mariupol is not, that is, something in this most collective western world makes them so worried about mariupol that even the hutteris pumped up this topic. well, obviously he himself never knew where mariupol was in his life, but the fact is that we are talking about those same four. the mercenaries who are sitting in the basements of azov have become. they want to get out on their own so that even a lint does not fall from them. everything else that does not interest them does not interest them. the commanders of the national battalion are there. azov is not
1:42 am
interested in civilians, which they use as human shields are absolutely not interested. this is an ultimatum demand that the gutter decided to hammer into his head in order to take it away from those who are sitting there underground at any cost. they don't want to smoke there. in this case, not the general secretary. he, namely 400 people, to whom we must show simply without any. we just took them, we have to let them go. they should calmly get out of there by bus. how to get to get to foreigners foreign mercenaries there is a whole international sitting six languages. they say they heard on the radio interceptions, they are constantly in touch with their own, and as they say in strange and other words. this bagpipe, which asks for extraction all the time, actually discussed what you think. e, guterish, this is extraction, but
1:43 am
not for volyn and all sorts of kalina radishes and so on, but for e strictly these e for foreigners. but these are the people for them people have questions. well, as you understand, knowing and understanding a lot about azov, i can’t imagine that these thugs are sitting there azov. and what, it means that buses are approaching, with salon flags and foreigners say, well, thank you, it was very nice. eh, it means, how would they take the wormwood with them here next to you, otherwise the wormwood would not stand and the oxen would take it over them. and that kolina and volyn are included in the package of our agreements, but they must consider that they should go, because if not, what do they think. it doesn’t matter to me to talk with putin discussed this. and here is the news that the un office for humanitarian affairs has formed a team for the evacuation from mariupol made contacts on wednesday with russia and ukraine, that is, some kind of team will come there, and we will let it through, and it
1:44 am
will evacuate someone from there and it’s interesting, the composition of these people and the filtering of these people will be carried out by the un or we or whoever, i’m sure that in - first jointly more than that, if you look further, uh, the conversation on our president sguteesh. and the president says two very important things. first, you, mr. secretary general, have been misled, because we really do operate humanitarian corridors. each time we give civilians the opportunity to leave, and which is why they don't leave. this is certainly the fault of those who are holding them hostage and actually compared this e-nazi, in general, the trash that the world is hiding behind there. he said this to people with terrorists for the second very important moment, just addressing the gutush. that is why erdogan called him before the meeting, that is, erdogan, who, unlike western leaders, has communication with our president. again, relations there, i will not touch on russian turkish relations now, and he, having this
1:45 am
the communication bridge says that only mariupol erdogan only mariupol gutserish comes to tell let's we have already fixed it, that it is obvious that there is something that they all need further now it remains only to follow and observe. in what form and under what conditions will they be given this and with what documents? program time will tell, we continue to work live. well, now let's move on to that one more. uh. in general, the front of this confrontation, since we hear about all these conversations. we will choke you. we will crush you. here are our sanctions, we will not take anything from you, and so on and so forth . and here we have gas in our apartment. so today gazprom has already officially announced that more gas supplies are being stopped and which was warned yesterday that if it does not pay in rubles, then goodbye, and it did not
1:46 am
pay in rubles and goodbye and to the heap. goodbye. also, bulgarian brothers, who also refused to pay in rubles. and now they have no gas in the apartment today. now arises question. this is what you were talking about, just a week ago, when we discussed here, is this the beginning of some kind of our proactive, not reactive position, or what? it? well, at least? yes, this is some kind of action. everything is serious. well, here you just need to understand what the consequences are, because by closing, for example, supplies to ukraine and poland and bulgaria, we do not shut off the pipe, because it has supports to other countries, that is, a consequence, and restrictions or the termination of these volumes is all this redistribution european supplies, because, well, germany, which is now pumping gas to poland on the reverse , will not leave it. yes, on the reverse, germany is driving to poland in the working part there is no russian, but it is
1:47 am
driving in poland the gas that is its gas. after all, ours have already said that if there are any volumes of gas, as they say about being selected and redistributed, then exactly to these volumes. yes , gazprom has cut the tradition, the third country. during the illegal extraction of gas, you understand, yes, i, as it were , in connection with uh, i wanted to take this proactive position to say a little about something else, how this situation around ukraine and gas began. yes, here is such a valve, because when the nord stream was built alone. there was an idea that germany is with russia by the way, why did ukraine become the main transport museum of germany to russia so that pipes would not go through the gdr, this was a condition for e-e western europe and the americans, so that pipes would bypass the gdr, so ukraine became, that is, so that there is no direct connection between germany and russia, nord stream alone was built according to this principle, they had to exchange initially assets, that is, the germans were supposed to enter ours. uh, how would the mining americans
1:48 am
break this system and the americans were hoping that they would enter uh, the german networks. enron. the germans tried to remember the well-known, they were not allowed in, this candidate was broken and then a ukrainian knot appeared, which does not allow to realize communication with germany and russia as a single, uh, technology center. e eurasia, in fact, this is the whole game. why else, as it were, when the nord stream goes to germany, if earlier pricing went from the borders of the soviet union or from there as transport costs, now it comes to germany and is already increasing in the other direction, that is, germany becomes the main hub and the main beneficiary. true, at the expense of russian gas. so i understand that this scheme is complicated, on which, by the way, we went, but that's not the point. okay ukraine well, you just got the news urgently. the minister for european affairs and property management, er, finland, here purinen said
1:49 am
finland we made a decision by the government committee on economic policy that finland will not accept payments in rubles, resembling 94% of gas. this is a country without any ukraine receives from us and they make such a decision, that means making such a decision. they accept it on the basis of something, and now the question arises. we will also block finland, because a precedent has been created , moreover, after the same precedent, prices jumped by 24% immediately jumped out. but when we say that we will also block finland the question arises. look here. eh, there is also some kind of subtle game that i want to understand, and for our viewers to understand? look at the european commission on the one hand. in fact, she made it clear to everyone that she is for those who are ready to buy for rubles according to the scheme that was proposed by us, which, in
1:50 am
principle, the european commission says. now the european commission will show us, so that we can read all this, in principle, says the european commission. in general, we do not mind. yes, the european commission has recognized the possibility of paying for russian gas in rubles. now there is an interesting question of the european commission. some countries recognize this possibility, while refusing it. and when we warned them about something in advance, we block it. gas. the same ursula foundation. suddenly says here is the text, please. gazprom's statement to unilaterally cut off gas supplies to consumers in europe is yet another attempt by russia to use gas as a blackmail tool. this is unjustified and unacceptable. and this once again shows the unreliability of russia as gas supplier. we are ready for such a scenario. we are preparing coordinated responses from the european union. i have a question. what kind of game is there if the european union has given every country and company the opportunity to buy it
1:51 am
for rubles? and we warned that we sell only for rubles, then why about those who, having the opportunity to buy for rubles, do not want to do this, this conversation is heard about blackmail and about the answer. what kind of game is it. there is such a moment here, we sell gas not to this or that country, but more specifically in this country, but in germany gas gazprom gazprom exports receive e, 12 companies and these companies found the opportunity to respect russian legislation and formally give the opportunity to rearrange it to their government to say we transfer in euros yes in euros, and then gas is quickly turned off. we we wo n't why can't this be done? explain to me, will you? you see, how could we, in fact, today even find fault with the statement of the austrian chancellor, but we will not do this, because why should we shoot ourselves in the foot. you explain to me after all, finland, having the opportunity to buy for rubles
1:52 am
and the european union does not mind, nevertheless says that it will not, why is it not looking for this opportunity. so she is attached to only the official statement. maybe this is also such a cunning rumor of the state of philadia, he says, we will only go in. what is a children's company? yes , they won’t transfer in euros, but she herself will open the bank, understand? here is the question. to what will russia become attached, to what? no, we have become attached to those who are considered our most malicious enemies. here for starters, it's more and bulgarian. why? poland , i don’t think it’s necessary to explain why it’s not just a shameful betrayal, because it’s from bulgaria that the flow is precisely from the bulgarians a blow in the back, but the most influential illness, but uh, punishing uh germany austria can even be in finland is a shot in the leg yourself. or maybe you can use maxim out of step why tell me to turn off the gas
1:53 am
in finland, i'm trying to understand why finland should make these statements? i 'm not with you ultrapariatism, and people write call. there on social media. uh, they write. let's turn off the gas for everyone so that we don't get $400 million a day. yes? i don't argue with that. i do not argue. with this now punishing. well, i think our leadership made a decision to punish those who got the most. i understand everything about them to the poles. it was necessary to cut off this gas. and i am glad that they will not buy it for rubles, but i still want to understand 94% of gas in finland. it is possible to buy for rubles, they make this statement. to me part of the problem explained that it is possible that some finnish companies will buy, while finland will continue to say that well, we are like, well, we played it, what is this game. this is a different scenario, maybe this scenario as well, let's see if 10 companies have indeed opened an account with
1:54 am
gazprombank, and four have already transferred money. well , there 10-12 i also consider it generally buy. and four have already transferred money to the account. that is, this suggests that european companies are using this scheme, about which she said that this is, in general, not a violation of sanctions, but an important point, and finland and poland and bulgaria, upon request , can receive russian gas, i explain how those countries that are now, and the countries with which we cooperate in rubles. yes, we trade the same . austria is the same, the same germany they are at the request of the european commission. again, this is more political, they will buy more. and we will buy this additional gas specifically for austria, specifically for germany, again from the point of view of economic feasibility. chips can supply another question maxim anatolyevich, then we can agree not to supply. and if this additional volume does not exist, then this is the very same game for broke and finland has also been declared by slovakia, which is also a critical bank. but look, if we do
1:55 am
not supply additional volumes, and they do not go into it, why, but forces in this situation what to do what are the poles doing? i understand the look. this is also very important in finland from poland and in bulgaria for about 4-5 months there are enough gas storage facilities, that is, they create specially here this crisis is conditional now, to see how they cope, because the power reserve is conditional, they also have a relation, we'll see, and we're going to see, we lost money nearby. it is clear that finland has more or less always had norway, but nevertheless, having norway nearby , they nevertheless received gas from us, that is, this means the finns will now look at the same logic. will they be able to buy this gas from norway, or considering that the prices are already, in my opinion, today again thousands of 300. and what are they from norway? i also look like this now i have a question, here is the scheme that nikita sergeevich described, and about which he really
1:56 am
writes that, roughly speaking, they will just have more gas through germany and austria well, those, then further questions will be distributed in two, we don’t care how it will be be done, it does not violate any of our principles and the second. why should they go? here, excuse me. here is cancer, if it was possible not to arrange all this. and what is the meaning of this game crazy if you take a slightly wider situation. yes , i agree that it exists at the micro level, if consider the micro-level, then the whole point of the transfer into rubles is it alone, if our proceeds are arrested, then western companies, they say, go with our states. understand, they imposed sanctions . now, if such a situation arises, then western companies themselves should not deal with their states, that is, russia says that these are not our problems. go deal with them. this is a microbe, if a broad level said yes, companies are buying, but all gas supplies used to be long-term within interstate agreements, what is a long-term contract 10-year-old this is long money gazprom could take any loan against them in
1:57 am
any bank, secured volumes, long term any bank, you will be given under a meager process. and you can invest in any task. it's on one of the forums. we talked with the guys, the germans there told me this, forget about the long-term project. e in contracts. it was another 10 years. this is american policy. remove russia's investment potential if we kill a long-term project and interstate guarantees supplies, then everything goes into sports and into the stock exchange, and on the stock exchange and the satellite commands a financial speculator. there, the main thing is not access to gas, but access to money. it can shoot down on him, of course, from the americans. yes, they can, but regulate prices. they can put pressure on germany they can put pressure on russia when i have the price mechanism without me. you won’t be able to drill new wells, you have to come to me for a loan, that is, this is a new new scheme, according to which gas is now traded, it’s still, yes, we wring out our own, because it goes for rubles, but as i understand it , that it is still more, uh, squeezed out and under the
1:58 am
american account we are deprived of access to long money russia gazprom and this task, which has been implemented for a very long time. that is, it has been delivered since the time of the nord stream one construction in the usa. this is fundamentally important, because when a long-term contract is negotiated by the buyer and the seller, when the stock exchange has a financial intermediary that trades in paper. you must resolve issues with him ; he becomes the regulator and the main one. and who is our main financial intermediary in the world and the main issuer, world currency. we knew the united states, but in fact, depending on how it goes, a special military operation and many other processes will depend on who it will become and when, and how all this will change tomorrow. not the day after tomorrow, but as a matter of fact, as they say in russia, you need to live a long time. time will tell how it will be. the information channel continues on the first
1:59 am
, we work live alesya loseva and anatoly kuzichev let's start with the very edge of the most important news of the last minutes, literally russian pilot konstantin yaroshenko, who is 12 years old usa held illegally held in prison going home already arrived. as i understand it, today our facilitator reported that, as a result of a long negotiation process, american student trevor reed, convicted in russia for a fight with a policeman during detention, was accused of a russian convicted by the united states on charges of training. e to transport drugs in the tenth year he was detained in liberia. here, therefore, on this basis, e. then he was deported to the usa where he was sentenced to twenty years in prison, the pilot complained repeatedly about torture after detention for deteriorating health, in prison for lack of treatment wrote an appeal to biden with a request to pardon him. well, biden said that negotiations on reed's return to the us required difficult decisions that were
2:00 am
not easy for him, but our pilot's wife reported that he would arrive in 2 hours already. e in moscow as i understand it, the exchange itself took place in turkey b good news very high-profile news very important and not only because our er, our man ended up in his homeland not only because justice existed, but also because why did it become possible at all. let's think about it. yes, here eroshenko was sitting in himself for all these years, someone else is sitting there as if he is sitting there and so on and there is a feeling. yes, for everyone, not only for me, not only for us, for lawyers, that all this is somehow knocked together to break us. that's pretty pretty messy. well, and so on. and suddenly, for some reason, it was during these very difficult, difficult days, so to speak for the whole world, that this exchange took place. why e what is there, what is there, so to speak, a supply?

13 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on