which can be driven in one day, visit all corners, sausage. yes, these are the largest. i would say there were warehouses of rocket artillery shells in the soviet union, but there was still a problem, an additional withdrawal of troops from europe and they were transported there in the open. well, in the open under the open. no, it was necessary to decide on the disposal and so on with weapons. union from all over europe first received the task. why do i say i am returning to the visit to unfreeze these conflicts, this is the conflict of transnistria moldova is the conflict of georgia abkhazia, they go for it. and yes. and, for example, the backpack does not continue to work. why are the borders small, so to speak, such military bonfires, but there is no time to reproach the attention of the efforts of russia 's leadership and so on. so, if the second task, there are three or four kilometers from the sausage, they add up. on the territory of ukraine, this is to get

this ammunition, which is not enough, they shot their own, they shot everything that was collected by the warsaw pact, and so on. today there is technology. end of projectiles. therefore, hands reach out there, they will take it or not military specialists will take it, they say, no, without the help of romania, no, and moldova does not want to participate. yes, no, because it is good 100% dependent on gas and they only heard russia's warning . try to solve this issue by military means . well, the second year, of course. clear. a warning is no longer a warning no one in the west hides that they deliberately insert. uh, russia is going to set fire to the spokes in the wheels wherever possible, and now listen to a conversation very characteristic of anthony blinky on senator robert mendens. india, which participates in the quadripartite security dialogue, buys oil. russia has s-400 anti-aircraft missile systems

avoiding the un vote, so we allow this country to become a member of the four, and it in turn bypasses the global sanctions that we impose on russia, i hope, mr. secretary of state, that you insistently explain to everyone that can do? and what not? i think this is a very important moment for us from a strategic point of view, since many countries, including those who you mentioned are considering and perhaps revisiting some relationships, including with russia in our interests, encourage them to work with that to see what we can do so that, along with success in ukraine and for ukraine, we also take advantage of other strategic opportunities that may arise. . i think this should also be taken into account when we choose to approach countries. some of them are related to russia in relations that have been going on for decades. their change and adaptations need time i guess when we do. that we should be as efficient as possible from a strategic point of view , general words, but i am more in the world. i hope

more than anything. i want these words of the minendos of an appeal to glinkin, to be heard in india, to be heard, india, because this is an absolutely boorish formula. i hope mr. secretary of state to persistently explain to everyone what can be done. and what is impossible about india , more than a billionth almost one and a half billionth country from the outside. so, here it is, how are you mendes said. i really want them to hear this, however, dmitry gennadievich perhaps , so to speak, we are overestimating the importance of the importance of national pride in such serious issues as international politics and economics or not, we are overestimating the importance of sanctions, that is, sanctions have been imposed by about 40 countries from 29, that now exist in the world lives in these countries. well , a little more than a billion people out of 7 billion. these countries make up about 35% of the world economy, you know, yes, we are talking about sanctions sanctions, well most of the world. she is not

supported by the sanctions, she does not participate in them, no matter how much they would like to see. here. i just wanted to clarify what? well, of course, so in general, if you measure arithmetic, then, of course, this is generally pah, but if not arithmetic, because they are of course they are, of course, this is the same golden billion in fact, which holds most of the economy in its hands, planets and sanctions, of which, of course, the sensitivity is 40% for us - this is the maximum, there is no more. why then are they how sensitive are these sanctions? why? then they, so to speak, so affect our economy, because we live in this agenda. we listen every day imposed sanctions. you are the same media media every day. tell me what sanctions were against us. well , if you talk about what will become friends and who will negotiate with us, if you tell. in latin america and central south america in africa and at the base you will tell, but these sanctions will take us, the kind of place they deal with

inconspicuous matters, right? of course, they are noticeable . there are no questions, because our economy was set up to grow together about our work. let me answer you just in case. uh, if we don’t talk about sanctions, then people will still come to the store and be surprised aside and you will be surprised again, dear anatolia, i’m talking about the fact that sanctions take the place they occupy. that is, you devote a third of your time to sanctions, and two to a third. tell us about the positive, what is happening, really, what economic conditions do we have that have replaced imports? well, there is a lot of this family of information, so tell 70% about the positive. 30% and then everything will fall into place. the guide will be reported to yours. thank you very much. thank you. we are ready to help you. er,

actually. if you say so stop diving, then you are right and wrong, but i think so. this is my personal personal assessment of what you said, uh, on the one hand. of course, of course, this is not all the savings, of course, far from the whole world, however, this is absolutely true, but we ourselves are also pure, true, we have grown together so much. so much associated with this part of the world, no more, but still a certain part of the world, so to speak, that, of course, any sanctions from this part of the world, no more, but still, it will be very sensitive for us here, i'm right . of course they are sensitive. of course they are noticeable. of course, they are not only, so to speak, in verbal incarnation, but also quite a financial medicine for everything else. but this is ours. actually, so to speak there was a decision to grow together so much with this part of the world that we now suffer from them . you are right, and i am right. so agreed. agreed, let's see. let's keep talking then, let's keep talking. here, then, here is this boorish attack of minendez robert about india. i hope you explain to them what can be done.

and what’s not interesting here, you probably saw kirlivovna that this is the same antonym, blinkin said that, it turns out, inclusion in the sir, and in the corps of the guards of the islamic revolution in the list, so to speak, the list of uh socialist organization was a mistake. this is an iranian structure , this is this is the same iran, this is the same set of uh islamic revolutionary guard corps about which the americans. they did not spare any epithets at all, no one more hell. yes nobody yes never. yes, and suddenly, all of a sudden, here we are, as the arrestovich shows. suddenly, broads and it turns out it was a mistake they are now being removed from the sand, and with these same terrorist organizations, the question is clear that iran is exhausted. well, not that exhausted, but, by at least for quite a long time, those under sanctions under heavy sanctions, er, and so on, probably, having seen the light of some economic sanctions ahead, of course, so to

speak, will look at everything with hope , exciting prospects open up. and perhaps they will reconsider their attitude towards us, including, because, as i said, dmitry gennadievich , he almost agreed with me. maybe we overestimate. the concept, so to speak, of national pride in international politics. may be in international politics, there is no such thing as a regular three meals a day. it is important. and honor, you understand, it will not be full. whatever you think . well, firstly, i think that now we have to wait for the answer. probably a courtesy from iran, because here there was such an alaverdi format, that is, in response to the proclamation to the north-territorial organization. they declared the pentagon to be one. that is, for example, from the point of view of official policy and iran, the pentagon, that is, the us department of defense, is quite. terrorist structure, which, again, but in general , takes us to a very interesting category, which, by the way, alexey arrestovich, already quoted today in this studio, loves very much. uh, in my speeches to use this phrase is called

the configuration space of opportunity. here, indeed. now, what is happening, it is connected with polyvariance and, uh, a competent politician and strategist. he will now charge several options at once and the first option. in general, they have already worked on this near frontier. that is something is already happening in the last month in karabakh , something is already happening in transnistria, this is the near contour around russia, and notice how a huge number of all sorts of different tasks are being solved in parallel under the guise, for example, turkey, which is now very active in iran and in the northern part and on the territory of syria is happening. uh, there is a very difficult tense situation in relations between china, respectively, and taiwa. and many other things, that is, there saudi arabia yemen can be listed endlessly, then there is, it just seems that the whole focus of the world 's attention. he is now in ukraine yes, of course , from a journalistic point of view, from the point of view of public interest, everything is there, but right

now, on the periphery of this attention , a lot of interesting things can be done, as for national pride, then, of course. this is something that is extremely difficult to measure in some material terms, and here again, as a rule, there is a long war. that is, the same, india - it is very long-suffering. i would have said a state that has been under this colonial british pressure for a long time. but then, in general, it began to develop very, but powerfully even now, but in general it is quite difficult to find those items on the foreign agenda on which, say, india and great britain speak in unison, they have much more differences and there is no need, as it were, to be deceived with this recent visit of boris johnson, where he is joyfully there, this turban nadya on the head, in fact, everything is very, very great britain, there are a lot of just oligarchs from india, which in fact including shops that have a huge impact on the uk economy, but as if summing up, india, china and turkey did not

join the sanctions against the russian federation, they are now in a position of hesitation, but in the eyes. at least the western countries look, so now they have a principled position. just what we saw in this dialogue, blinkin and minendas, this is what is called real politician. this is something people don't really need to see because it looks very ugly. that is, here again, this quote about bismarck about sausage. that is, it is not necessary, in fact , not something else. yes, you don’t need to know, because what can you not put on, even a woman’s dress, even a tulip further, just to say so, well, yes, make friends with india now and from the british side from the us just right. channels, that is, well, up to the most brutal type, and the lines of the ministry of defense to less so. e, harmless, more there, on the contrary, more precisely harmless. uh, there from a series of some negotiation platforms, and the chapters ministry of foreign affairs, where will it go,

pumping that you, dear friends of the aforementioned, will not be able to sit on two chairs, you will have to choose whether you are for us or you are still against us, that is, this is the position, maybe it will or will simply end, of course , often, there nancy sang and sherman constantly they know there as the main supporting potential interests to say, you please join the sanctions. and those while standing. really dry or they are willing to learn. but if only, then africa is also to itself closer. uh, look what you said about kira lvovna, here is a conversation with senator eminemes, yes, not a blink, but something is ugly. here is another such ugly moment from yesterday's meeting. this is not glinka's senators happened. there he has a verbal altercation. and on what topic? if ukraine became a member of nato, then our soldiers would now be on the battlefield. you understand that by continuing to call for ukraine to be included in the ranks of the alliance, while maintaining such a policy of behavior, you will be forced to send american forces

kyiv front. yes, this is an important topic, it's good that you touched it. however, i have a different idea of ​​what is happening strange, which have been attacked by russia in recent years. georgia ukraine was not part of the alliance the kremlin specifically attacks only those countries that are not members of nato it can also be argued that the countries that russia attacked were part of the soviet union i completely disagree with this. i mean, i don't agree anthony well, listen, well, you're in four grades. you are finished well comment. what does it mean in general? to a person, actually, uh, american politicians, they show, uh, the power of their knowledge in geography in history and. well, this is sometimes basic in politics. yes, it's all in quotation marks. naturally. well, as far as uh possibilities.

or rather, as regards the same georgia, uh was not there, in fact, an attack on georgia georgia itself attacked our peacekeepers. i think it just protected its peacekeepers. and already, as you understand, this is why alexander borisovich is very difficult to discuss with the americans. that's it you will say that, in general, it was georgia that attacked the russian peacekeepers, the documented documents are documents for you. you know, i strongly disagree with this. come on, cover, as in the first place, firstly, there you need to look at the fire in chronology. you can look at the visit anyway, it all started fire on ours. the georgians opened up with the creators, and before that the georgians were trained by the americans and the team, or rather, the americans definitely gave saakashvili the go-ahead, because he is a coward. he himself would be on this action. well never would

i didn’t dare, but by the way, no, we understand all this very well, listen to them, i don’t know if they understand. maybe they simply, so to speak, are there to distract attention, as da kil’vovna told us that there is such a technique, that it is necessary to pay attention to something, such as let out, think that we are fools. and we are at this time, but, as for at this time, it’s not for nothing that they remembered the former soviet republics . here we talked about this about tactics or even about the strategy of setting fire to on borders in russia, uh, and full-fledged bonfires and small bonfires, and so on. it seems to me that all this, so to speak, indirectly, speaks precisely of the fact that such a tactic is precisely such a practice. yes, she is now using new weapons, this is what they will continue to do, it turns out a strategy. by the way, they tested it in yugoslavia and quite effectively. well, yes, well, what do you think ? we're ready for uh, well what we warn is armed. it's like, yes, but on the other hand, it's not enough to be warned to us to resist all of this. oh, we need those very allies, those very hesitant ones who should

unhesitatingly choose aside or not or from over-dramatizing? no, well, of course, we need to look for an ally, of course, we should just say now that guys, let's look for our allies not in the west, but in the east. we have a wonderful organization called breeze so based on brix. we can create our own cryptocurrencies, which means that the regulatory authorities will introduce general rules and so on. all this is possible, and it will also be beneficial for these countries. uh-huh, you know about this. we must speak. it is necessary not only to focus on ukraine. we still need to look for them look at the rest of the world to look for guys, let's go to you, this is also beneficial. let's do together what is beneficial to our countries, our economies and we have strong allies. if you take that's just brix without the rest of the periphery. this is about 25-30 percent of the world economy,

there is a very powerful structure, if arithmetic, at least, yes, yes, if we take everything else on the periphery, then this is very serious, so say, a very serious organization. very serious resources very serious influence. and there we will play exactly the leading place, exactly the leading ones, clearly. yes, nicky, please continue, just the thought of dmitry gennadievich, we respect his friend about the benefits. really. you don’t need the same illusions that the same strange brix they will interact with us just because they are also for justice for the reorganization of the world order, they should be primarily beneficial and this is the situation with india is a super important precedent. now i will try to explain why mendes is so furious about india in 2021. india imported 16 million barrels of oil from our country, which is about $120 billion in monetary terms, and now attention. first, the military operation in ukraine for 2 months, the volume of our exports. well

, actually russian oil to india has increased 2.5 times already 40 million barrels of oil. we have sold more than that, that is not all the most interesting thing is that among all the economies of the leading g20 india demonstrates the highest economic growth rate of 8.9%. this is given the global crisis and this, given the pandemic post, pandemics burrow. and all this is happening against the background of the fact that russian oil, which was previously supplied to the west, will be oriented to india, see. what precedent is being created by india due to interaction with us due to the fact that it is not afraid of sanctions due to the fact that it finds schemes to circumvent this, and not only receives oil at a discount. we do sell oil at a certain discount, and therefore, india is profitable, but due to this, it is now number one in the world in terms of growth rates of its economy. obviously the americans. this is to allow this precedent to exist, within which a country of one and a half billion is really at the expense.

including russian oil, interaction with russia also receives cheap oil, which, by the way, the indians are now trying not only to transfer to state-owned companies, but also to private ones just in order to bypass the sanctions themselves, and in this sense, this is its benefit to feel her indians are simple and not simple and politicians and businessmen. they can feel it, because look at nikita. yes, from the outside, you remember it used to be terminology, so to speak. let's stick with it too. it's just simpler strange first world countries of the third world but strange, there we will say the second world. see what we have to offer from a first world country. india has a lot of things a lot of high-tech stuff like that and about money and stuff and stuff, they can, in addition, they can offer unprecedented pressure, and and everything else that we can offer here, pay attention when we talk about us. we offer uh, always sounds in one. there is russia gas oil russia oil

is an important point, yes, when they are in this sense , you understand, they will definitely demand something in return. yes, they will get hooked on such a consumer, including a needle, and then a certain moment, as they already practice this. they just reset everything more, which we can offer an important point. i plan on doing this. like, uh, probably a person. e from just martian positions the economic basis, when an economic basis is created for mutually beneficial, then the ideological setting, the political setting, we see the multipolar world in me- in the form of the creation of all kinds of institutions and systems that do not depend on western influence. it will automatically start. therefore, this is a solid economic framework, in my opinion. it is just that springboard, thanks to which i understood with india, we will continue to interact on other levels, which will concern completely different things, not necessarily oil and gas. if it is difficult to say one thing, as it seems to me, the most important thing is that we have a student now, because high, uh, high incomes, just in the sale of oil and gas from the

applicant. they would be many times larger than they were before, only on the 21st. we have a huge budget surplus there, and so on. and what i think, i think it's important to say. this means that this money is a huge amount of money that has now accumulated in the country. it's not forever. we, if i don't know, maybe a year, a maybe two, to spend them on technologically in general in all industries to raise all industries without exception, to push, so to speak, and not to work on oneself. we have a year or two. we won't be able to build this basis for the rest of our lives on oil and gas. no, it doesn’t happen like that for a year or two, the maximum task for the west is to see russia weakened, and ukraine free and independent. hear what general mark mile told cnn there's a lot more at stake in this war than ukraine is at stake the security of europe, if russia gets away with its aggression in ukraine, then the international order will be shaken and the age of global instability will come. in the end. politicians of all

countries want to see a free and independent ukraine, its territorial integrity and a stable government, for this russia must be weakened. yes, but this is also the same thing, which i hope you explain to him how to do it. how and how not. it's the same thing indeed. yes , indeed they are. they are russians. the world order is correct. the world order, where we are the main thing, and you are all. so to speak below us, but briefly. well, you know, it seems to me that this is cunning, because everything that is happening now in ukraine is everything that the west and america are doing. it’s just that they make a state military company out of ukraine, the task of which is to fight everything with russia, they pay them money in the form of a salary, and they give them weapons and say, if you fight with russia, we will support you. that's what he does. and here is the national, and here is the territorial integrity. and here is independence, if they themselves turn the west into ukraine into a military company for war with russia. that's what she's doing? naturally, some kind of integrity

is possible. what is the subjectivity? and what kind of state is none of these, it seems to me, i’ll even say in a whisper what it seems to me, and in ukraine no one thinks about the project anymore, everyone understands that there is no nick of ukraine from the point of view of a mile of minendes, biden, kamalla harris, anyone? remember, there is no such formation on the map, so to speak, the political map of the world, as ukraine is, russia against which you need to fight. and there is, so to speak, a device to which you can fight against russia. this device is called ukraine everything. most importantly, there are people who are at war, well, of course. then we will understand that there is generally a key e, in general, the task was not to find economic bases. and this, in fact, was a confrontation between two ideological, primarily different systems, and the peristalistic one with western values, and so on, against the socialist one, which generally dictated a completely different agenda. and the third world is just those very undecided, hesitant two of them.

these are big ones, and the parties tried to somehow turn over, but under their own banners. and in this sense, we are in the economy with all due respect to the economy, we will not go far. we need to give an image of the future. we need to give the configuration of international relations of the future is very important, and equality of justice and so on, therefore, pay attention. all these visits of the butyrish, and all these endless ones, and allusions to the weary organization. nations is all for a reason. it 's not just for the red word all the time and lavrov and our president. they say this is really an alternative to what the american and where a is offering a rules-based order, it is, in fact, a mafia organization of international relations. there is, i don't want to say it, but let's try to say so. well, tough and honest to talk about this image of the future. and tell, please, the most part of the population of planets in general the person. e anything other than regular three meals a day is desirable in the image of the future worries. if you are an educator

right now here in the twenty-second year, but is it educate the creator. it is possible to create a more spiritual and not just tied to three meals a day. we've already done this friends. i, i just want, i really, i myself want to be an optimist, and i will be one no matter what. right after our program, but for now i want to tell you that we have been trying for 70 years, indeed. well, actually, what was it? the main thing, so to speak, is that you are ideological, i don't know romantic. uh, the calling of the soviet union and so on. yes, we raised a new person. uh, like a new format. we tried to make him not a dumb consumer. we tried to make him really a person who is completely attuned to some sort of way. well , a special highly spiritual, uh, spiritual person in the 90s . so, when all our highly spirituality loomed on the horizon with a zhrachka and jeans. i don’t know at what stage we blew it and where. you know what’s the matter, as soon as we loomed on the horizon. oh cool, ugh and all. on this man of the new

formation ended the question. we are now appealing to humanity. we hope that humanity, like we want to live in a world that is much more . it's very cool. oh now we have pah. here are the reasons we have that it will help us agree, and that it will help us try to give an answer. don't you think it's so global that the lord god said guys the way you lived before it's already impossible to live, and he gave a serious signal. look at the pandemic. what kind of selfishness in the whole world and so on? what, so to speak, is not the perception of each other. and today he says that monopoly is only with god, many peoples have different paths to god but to the one god their sacred books, but to god, but on earth on this sinful monopoly is harmful - this is a

disaster, and the americans took the monopole in their hands . yes, they didn’t have a monopoly, it was the soviet union, and if there was the soviet union at the time when they bombed, and why is it bad, and it’s bad because you want, you can fight, you want to declare an enemy somewhere you carry money. freedom of speech is his short you understand, that is, kill him slava had a strong soviet union yes, there would have been either a strong russia she was weakened in her glory, no one dared to bomb. i understand, look, i understand everything, i monopolize him. bad than bad.