Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    April 28, 2022 11:00pm-11:31pm MSK

11:00 pm
russia must not be allowed to win, of course, the war with ukraine. well, what else is it called? and they say that they are not fighting against russia, i am still worried that there is an escalation and escalation. e reminds me now of the american escalation of the american game called chickengay. that is, who will blink? well, that is, when, uh, peepers, yes, who yes and then, uh, no matter how they thought that they were inferior to russia, moreover, a lot of recent publications, where analysts. they say you know. putin lavrov russian leadership scares the west that, although our leadership did not say anything of the kind, that they would launch a nuclear
11:01 pm
strike. if not strategically, then with tactical weapons, the conclusion is drawn from this that russia will not be able to cope with ukraine with conventional weapons and therefore russia will resort to this. uh, well, a tactical nuclear strike, where did they get it from? russia is fighting half-heartedly, there is no mobilization. in general, the number of our armed forces in ukraine is several times inferior to the ukrainians in number, and still we see where this one is moving process, and therefore, it scares me, because it seemed to me that, of course, there really are sober voices in washington, but there are very few of them. well, here you showed. turchaga, who spoke on several occasions that
11:02 pm
one should not get involved so deeply, because, in fact, america, by its actions, is pushing ukraine into an even larger and larger war with its arms supplies, and so on. it will be a lot of blood. all the same, ukraine will be defeated. but it's all blood and all this destruction will be actually on the conscience of the americans, because they are under healing. they are pushing they are supplying weapons, and so in these e under these conditions. of course, i must say that yesterday's statement of our president was unequivocal, that is, the truth. that some said not much. it is clear that he did not specify what it is, which means we will put it where we will put it, where will it be uh in
11:03 pm
ukraine or will it be uh. well, it's just the mpq constructs, so the constructive ambiguity, which has a deterrent effect. it should, but i see that of course, this is an escalation. especially the fact that here we just talked about this, what biden says, now we need to confiscate the property of the russian property. we'll talk more. yes , what am i talking about today? what did the americans decide that this x hour is for them when they have to prove to the world? that they are still the first superpower, under their dictation, a new world order will be established, because as they believe. well, you know the last time in all the strategic documents, they called russia and china revisionist countries. well, what are
11:04 pm
revisionist countries, suddenly there are countries that do not accept the supremacy of the united states and the unilateral dominance of the united states, instead of sitting at the negotiating table to determine a new rule of the game to agree and adapt to new conditions in the world. they go ahead like that stupidly and believe that if they don’t break russia now and then china, then, of course, america will come out of this conflict in a very miserable state. that is why i would like to end here. that's why for us it is existential moment we have to come out victorious in this war, because it will be a victory over ukraine, it will be a victory over the
11:05 pm
united states and a united west. this is what it should be. in general, it is well understood by our society and our political circles that the fate of our country is being decided here, god forbid, if they suddenly succeed, like they others in herb. glinkins there and austins and so on, that it is impossible to allow russia to win out of spite, not out of spite, but you just just need to win and put all before a fait accompli, and that will be a compliment in this. that's what you wanted, you got it. and i completely agree with androitim with andronik. in everything. we are indeed experiencing an existential conflict, and this conflict is existential in nature. not only for russia , yes, but also for the collective west and for the united states, and they began to understand the existentiality of this conflict. i think that the rhetoric about the alleged intention or readiness
11:06 pm
of russia to use weapons of mass destruction is also confirms. yes, their sense of existentiality and their understanding that it is existential for both sides and the actions that they are taking to increase the supply of weapons, and more and more heavy weapons of the institution. the establishment of a mechanism for the supply of weapons, i mean the creation of a special control center for ukraine within the european command of the us armed forces and the provision of more and more intelligence information and direct encouragement for ukraine to carry out military strikes on russian territory. yes, eh. damn, tony linkin, the united states secretary of state, speaking in the senate, and the other day he said that it is, well, the discretion of ukraine whether to strike at russian territory or not, but the point is that the united states does not mind, and the secretary of defense in the uk in plain text declared that
11:07 pm
they were for yes, and that, moreover, the uk would not object if british weapons were used to strike russian territory. yes, british weapons. all this together, just speaks of the existential nature of this conflict. well, here at i have a question e for you, but nikolay viktorovich after all, if this conflict is existential, and it is already recognized as existential, yes, that is, in this conflict it is impossible, impossible, impossible to lose, impossible to lose. yes, neither one nor the other country, because the loss will mean the collapse of positions in international, uh, relations in the international order. and if indeed already in the west they openly admitted that this is even though baitan denies this, but nevertheless both blinkin and austin and many others say this is a hybrid the war against russia is on the cone here exactly the place and role of both russia and the west in this international order. that's what surprises me is the lack
11:08 pm
of fear, but in the west, but about the consequences of those actions, here, which i listed, yes, which they are taking, uh, in relation to. uh, in relation to ukraine, why are they not afraid of escalation? why is the west still in a sense of no duty and security why are they not a shield? uh, why don't they allow the thought that if this is really an existential conflict, then russia too, can e hit. yes, not necessarily sarmatians. yes, they are sure to respond to those they meet, but with strikes and hypersonic missiles. russia has a lot of ways to aggravate the security situation of the west because they believe that, firstly, they have more tools. secondly, they launched a controlled chaos, and they believe that they are in control of the situation when they talk about the possible use of tactical nuclear
11:09 pm
weapons by russia and repeat and repeat. actually. they do not believe that russia is an application and they understand that russia will not do this and, accordingly, they are lining up. quite a logical chain. we manage the conflict, because the degree of conflict, the initiative of this conflict is in washington and london but it’s not in moscow that russia wants to quarrel with the west, conducting an operation on the territory of ukraine, but it is the west that wants to suppress russia, which dared to carry out an operation on the territory of ukraine, it is worth noting here nevertheless. what is going on in general 3.5 players in the world not three and a half china russia the united states of america and europe, and when a colleague calls russia china revisionist countries - this is a very interesting term, but it seems to me that it should be applied not to russia, china, but to the united states of america, that is, revisionist americans. yes, yes, yes, i will explain my idea now,
11:10 pm
that is, we are talking about the fact that someone is changing the world order, but the united states is the dominant of the past. europe is such, uh, it is an ally and satellite of the united states of america in the past and in the present. and today is today and definitely tomorrow dominant - this is china and that's it. this is the world order, which has already begun or is approaching five minutes before, the united states wants to revise it and here they need to be weakened. china they need to weaken russia to keep europe weak and partially this plan succeeds they manage to quarrel russia europe but the paradox is that they bring russia and china closer together of course, for them this is an extremely sad story, but they put everything at stake, because the conflict. as you say existential, it will mean a complete reformatting of the entire planet and now the question is principled russia challenged the one who himself was going to challenge everyone and rebuild the whole
11:11 pm
world, and therefore russia should be publicly punished if the situation arises that they have overwhelmed ukraine with weapons, they have assembled an unusual large coalition, which, at the command from washington, it is important to show them here. this is unity. yes, they just pressed the button and everyone votes for that, if in this situation. russia will achieve the goals set in the special operation, then the question will arise guys, what can you do on the planet, except to overwhelm a weapon, to threaten, what is called flapping its wings, so the question is extremely fundamental , it is not only about the fact that china will move further, forward, watching how russia, uh, solves its problems. here other arabs will catch up. india uh, other countries. they will look for new alliances of new patrons, realizing that akella has already missed this american one. and kelly can't be allowed to. well, the last thing i would like to note about the confiscation of assets. it
11:12 pm
seems to me that this is a direct conversation between washington and russia and with beijing, which has much more assets and which is shown that my dear, we will not stop at stealing your trillion assets. and so wait until then. dealing with russia and we'll take care of you. we 'll talk about china again, but now i would like to focus on the international order. i totally agree. this is a struggle around the international order, and yesterday the british foreign secretary gave a speech, well, with a speech that claims to be historical , but in a management house. this is a residence. e lord mayor of the city of london, and in this speech, litras just outlined what kind of international order the west needs, listen let's be honest , the architecture designed to guarantee the world
11:13 pm
prosperity has failed in ukraine, the structure of the economy and security that has developed after the second world war and the cold war has now deformed. it allowed aggression rather than restrained it. russia is capable of blocking any effective action in the un security council. we need a global nato. by this, i do not mean expanding membership to other regions. i mean that nato should have a global perspective. it must be ready to face global threats. we must also build on the strong core that we have in the g7, the g7 must act as an economic nato collectively, protecting our prosperity. brilliant yes. that is, it is not needed, but a global nato is needed and the g7 should become the economic lever of nato well, the global global sphere of the atlantic alliance, of course, is cool. who endowed the north atlantic alliance they can endow themselves with the functions of a global security organization, whatever they want
11:14 pm
the international community will not agree with this, but here we must return to your question about the world order, because it is very complex and they themselves are different. this is characterized even by western colleagues, who should be in one. uh, so to speak, five tune, they characterize this one in different ways. and if we look at what is happening in the world, then it must be said that the united nations system, which has been cementing factor yalta-podzamskaya system of international relations operates. and a bunch of institutions that have existed since 1945, well, in the forty-ninth year , ligaments continue to operate after all. nato this is what this is the activism of the very cold war, therefore, when american and british colleagues say that strikes against russia are in accordance with international law. and this is what yesterday or passion also said. uh, well, they are not only burying the system of international security created as a result of the second world war, they are
11:15 pm
they also bury all those institutions, a and all these bundles that have arisen in particular. and in this connection , a very serious question arises, the question of revisionism and the question of the future of this system of international relations, and the future system of international relations is not about what will be the hegemon that will determine everything in general. it was such a short illusion, a transition, yes, because celestre said a very important thing, and the current world order following the results of the second world war and the end of the cold war, while others say that the cold war is going on, that is, in fact, then in how we are today. it's a very big, very serious question that we need to think about, but most importantly, here, uh, this desire of the united states is manifesting. this is a short, from a historical point of view, illusion of a monocentric world order to try to preserve. save as much as possible, today
11:16 pm
it is possible only by coercion, and this monocentric unipolar world is possible only in a very limited part of the world in the european part. nowhere else. what does it show all current events are that the americans will obviously be forced, as a result of the clash of these very existential interests, to be content with europe at best, and then europe is not all ready to be a colony until the end. they are fighting, they are trying to form within themselves these dividing lines. who is more ready to be, e colonies of the united states, who is smaller inside europe, there is a display, it will increase as the realization comes that they are made by the colonies. this fight inside will be yours, along with this will raise questions. unfortunately, they will arise too late if they ask questions now. about e security guarantees,
11:17 pm
why? only now we have been talking about this for a long time. russia put its proposal to the americans much earlier. and discontent will gradually arise even in this conditionally close-knit world and an attempt to revise this state. and as for the rest of the world, it is with this illusion of monocentricity. disagree and disagree americans make serious mistakes attracting china and russia to each other americans make serious mistakes. allowing the east to increase. thanks to them big thanks to the elder hegemon for quietly giving up these idle reigns. but the last thing i will say here is the worst thing, when e beast is cornered, he behaves extremely aggressively and there is a high probability. the aggression of the us policy
11:18 pm
if not directly, then indirectly through its satellites in relation to russia, this is probably the greatest risk that exists today and that is why the phrase of our president, which was heard, was heard, is very important. it's all there with you. agree. this is a phrase that russia's response will be maximum clear and lightning. well really. here, uh, i totally agree again that there is a risk of escalation. yes, the initiator of this risk is precisely the weakening west, which today is waging a desperate struggle, and against russia, it is the west that is the cause of that disorder. we do not live now, nor in the world order after world war ii and after the cold war. we live in a world of turmoil causes that are emerging west, a emerging multi-polar world. we'll talk in a few moments. no, in russia there is
11:19 pm
such a family, wherever memory had its own hero. and the eyes of the young soldiers of the faded photograph look at this look, like the highest court for the guys that are now growing up and the boys cannot be returned in memory of those who died for those who returned from the war, a sign of gratitude to the generation of the victors of the immortal regiment. anxiety anxiety insomnia and so on
11:20 pm
you can help yourself in a circle afobazole helps to cope with anxiety and insomnia afobazon four weeks for the most pronounced action, just one registration and many banks at my service. percentage of time passes, and the joints remain in excellent shape revolutionary composition for joints with new generation collagen art now let the joints remain young vtb team issue a free multicard.
11:21 pm
in business, plans are sometimes frustrated, but we do not lose heart, but turn them into new opportunities. and they talk about the benefits of discounts up to 60% at the sbermarket, and bonuses from sber thank you supermarket. order care from pyaterochka discounts for you 69.90. how is it you remember that name tired sleep bad
11:22 pm
to improve cerebral circulation of the brain, memory recovery, reduce fatigue and improve sleep. now i will not forget in the bank. uralsib, we made a credit card for 120 days without interest, with which everything adds up. leave a request for uralsib point choose your hit ozone discounts up to 60% on the pioneer microwave oven plus free delivery by courier or points of issue of orders, what to say, stop has become more fun. a billion rubles just two weeks jackpot from the russian lotto a gift to each participant the minimum winnings twice as much as soon as you sleep for tickets, as in childhood on a public or on your own chicken or egg or delivery, we understand.
11:23 pm
how many things do you decide during the day, so the world card works for you every day, the world payment system in magnit hot discounts for all occasions. movies and series new every week on kinopoisk plus millions of tracks for any mood on yandex.music plus my wave a new recommendation system that knows what you like exactly for free until the summer of yandex.plus a subscription with many pluses when your nerves are at the limit you need magnelis b6 - this is a magnet reinforced with vitamin b6 magneli, b6 up to 30% more affordable than a similar imported drug that is right for you, download the sberbank and pharmacy application. broadcast big game today, president
11:24 pm
biden delivered an address on ukraine, announced new measures to contain russia, but by its nature uh, these measures, uh, remain. the same, that is, fundamentally, baidan did not say anything new, but quantitatively, and they draw attention to themselves, firstly, we are talking about a bill on not freezing, but on confiscation, but on those russian assets that are currently subject to sanctions in the united states to the registry and we are not talking about state russian money, but from private money, that is, about the assets of russian businessmen about the confiscation of russian private property and that the united states, uh, gives itself the right to dispose of russian property, in particular, to transfer it to ukraine, the question arises. and where in general was the principle of the sacred inviolable private property at the origins of the
11:25 pm
american percent? they are generally at the heart of american prosperity and the second measure, and which was announced by president biden, is a request to congress for new money to help ukraine , we are talking about $ 33 billion, of which $ 20 billion 20 billion is military assistance. well, firstly, here you need to understand that this is money for american military-industrial complex and lloyd austin and tony blinkin. a-a in their previous activities in their careers represented the interests of the american military-industrial complex. louis, that is, a general, which means, secondly, and the provision of such an amount of 20 billion is irrefutable proof of the united states' bet on prolonging the conflict, because 20 billion cannot be spent in a week in a month, even in a few months. this is a long time in reksevich. i think that these biden actions indicate that the
11:26 pm
american administration is final moved, then in this phase of the game without rules. that is, what i want, then the doctor is not afraid of anyone. i’ll punish everyone what i want, and i’ll do it, and it’s very important that he thinks that he is in this way, but he goes to escalate and b demonstrates that he is not afraid, not of russia, not of putin, and therefore in this way he will achieve that result, which, in general, he and many in administrations want, that is, the preservation of american leadership. i think that here, in my opinion, this has already been discussed. this is really a rearguard battle, you understand? i remember well. you know, when in 2000, condolelis was here, when she was an adviser, and then became national security officer, usha
11:27 pm
jr., then secretary of state. she waxed circle meeting was in carnegie. she said, you see, we are too strong to reckon with anyone , especially the elephant and even the security council. i mean, they could afford it back then, because that's not her literalism. as they said. er, well, one-sidedness dominating the world. they are, in terms of their economic potential, military potential could afford it, the most interesting thing is that the more america falls, the more aggressive. she becomes this allergary fights to maintain her lead. it seems to me that this is an act of desperation, i completely agree, but here we must understand that ukraine and europe are not the only theater of these rearguard battles from a global point of view, the pacific region is absolutely more important and the united
11:28 pm
states not russia but china call their main strategic adversary, including the military adversary, and china is being pressured china is blackmailing. a and. a. here is another package of threats, and she expressed it against china in the same speech. the same british foreign secretary track sheet. let's listen to it again. moscow aggression and its war crimes russian exports to china grew by almost a third in the first quarter of this year and they are rapidly building up armed forces capable of projecting their power deep into regions of strategic interest to europe china is not invulnerable and its rise is not inevitable, it will continue to rise. only if he plays by the rules. china needs to trade with the big seven. we own about half of the world economy. and we have the right to choose. have we shown
11:29 pm
russia what we are capable of if someone violates the international rules? and yuri vadimovich well, in general, when the british foreign minister is now scaring, china reminds me of, uh, krylov's famous fable about an elephant and a pug. but speaking seriously, then, of course, e listraz. here expresses not so much his own opinion, but the opinion of the collective west and the united states in the first place, which are already trying to scare china with the experience of russia and the sanctions that the united states is currently exerting on russia china will be afraid china e was not afraid and is unlikely to be afraid, but not because they are unrestrained optimists, yes, who do not understand. in what world they live, they calculate everything. they are actively studying our experience. the ukrainian company and everything connected with it, they have already learned a very important
11:30 pm
lessons learned, the military field of nuclear war will not. counteraction will be conventional conventional, with regard to this type, they are going to respond sharply against sharper, which they are now demonstrating in the area of ​​​​taiwan and the south china sea , congressmen arrive, air rises strategic bombers and sail into the taiwan strait, frigates with cruise missiles arrive by phone or the chinese minister of defense . just in case, the chinese are raising a group of 2 nuclear bombers, two electronic aircraft fight, seven fighters, and they are also sent to the direction of taiwan, the chinese are not afraid.

12 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on