yes, she was a favorite until there is a story. how many cards have been drawn, they also have all these phantom pains. and actually, with regard to romania, we now already see that it all started, because where, romania, there is such a completely unambiguous interest in moldova ; then in a way to lure the russian federation into opening a second front - this is now. well, that's the thing. generally. vs which even therefore transnistria from possible aggression on the part of ukraine and even in the prospects from romania, there can be all sorts of yes, we can find it far. you just need to understand that now they will try to distract us from and to. it is clear that our task is to concentrate on what the president declared back in february, but you need to understand that these are attempts, but to defocus attention. they will definitely be more than that. let's not forget that both romania and poland are in

nato and to me in general now the united states is represented in as you know such a father, to whom the children come running and screaming. i want candy. and i want a bear. and i want a toy there, of course, and now i need to calm everyone down and give everyone, on the one hand, a spoon on the forehead and on the other hand, in order not to pay, now i’m watching what you say, for some reason, i persistently asked this question. but still, this is an action that is planned, as if it were real, in order to plow something for yourself on the ground here and there, or is it still an action. as you say, and many of them are about transnistria they say this is an action that is aimed only at tearing us apart on the informational, as it were, front and forcing us to refocus and distract from the entire parallel process. this is always parallel in a hybrid war. you military actions will be combined with information impact. you understand that it is always exactly what a parallel process is. and how do we know that the direct parallel do not intersect, that is, one thing

is to pump something up around pridnestrovie, and another thing is to start hostilities there, which will be, which will make it necessary to transfer there, perhaps some reinforcements in the same way to bring some troops here and somehow force us. well, how would you decide where it is? these are different things. yes, fuck it, and so they are americans, uh, they work for themselves and, saving themselves and their internal social situation, degrease europe, we discussed this many times to use ambitions, we are not more, and that’s the ambitions that the fleet is talking about now, they throw them into the furnace , in fact they say, and what is the firebox, well, you assume that if the poles they will go to some lvov, i don’t know the ternopil ivano-frankivsk region, there someone will arrange some kind of furnace for them. there are often combat-ready ukraine once or twice and there is no communication. well, whatever you do anyway, it's understandable that they're crossing some red lines. do we

have our red lines there, or are there ukrainian red lines? let them downloaded from us, by the way. so i always pay attention to the fact that our supreme commander for basic education is a lawyer, you asked, but he will begin crumble, and we understand, and yury does not recognize the collapse of ukraine, and i'm sure. you, what, we recognize it and we recognized it. and yes, we did not recognize in connection with the hostilities. these a parts of the a ldnr, where was the referendum held? yes, we did not recognize crimea, where the referendum was held, but in any case, without the appropriate legal procedures. we do not recognize this. will they be able, as we did not recognize, crimea and crimea in general, the composition of the russian federation , precisely thanks to the referendum held, including the lpr, was also an option. so here i am in a whisper i ask. do you doubt? what about in the lviv

ivano-frankivsk region, ternopil, and then in the lutsk region, and some referendums will be held uh at a time, listen, in the kosovo referendum will not be required. why do we need this? do you understand what 's the matter? here you need to look at the map and, of course, talk with military experts. that is why, because this is a border, it is absolutely not accidental, as far as i understand, we always returned to this border, because it is this border that provides, as far as i understand, but questions the security of the russian federation for sure. here, including here, uh, just like that, together with lev lutsk and other different places, otherwise the threat remains for the same transnistria and for odessa and for the black sea coast. this does not smile at us at all. yes now colleagues one second. when did you start to analyze, but these polish gestures, you said something else about belarus and the very thing about the kaliningrad region, and

this is like and this is for them why and this is a competent dream, as i understand it, and he is already involved in this matter and germany potentially about the kaliningrad region there are some phantom pains among the germans. well, you seriously think that now someone is ready to think that, at certain distances, in response to our doctrine, you understand, but that appetites are growing. and this is not madness that is now discussed. this is also insanity. here the polish troops in ukraine, it is clear that we also announced that we would strike at the very headquarters. they understand that they are being set up when they planted american nuclear warheads, and those the most, but by nuclear saturation. they understood that they were becoming a target for a blow, which means they were going into this trap. wanted to add. i just wanted to

say that remembering the wonderful yakub korea of ​​our old comrade. we discussed this topic with him many times and agreed that more, uh, he has his own very rich account with the western nazis and bandera, and she will deal with them with great pleasure, which is why they ask this question. how do we respond and listen to your opinion, because i believe that this is a problem that is further, but i know for sure that someone will carry out the cooperating of these lands, and from and to and all these jumps will turn into instantly. it's like the poles. well, in general, time will tell. actually. you spoke about nuclear weapons, which will hear talk about nuclear weapons. also lately. somehow so suspicious often pop up. we will also talk about this today. but there is also the topic of gas, poland, which bears these, as it were, plans. at the same time , she behaves quite cunningly with our gas yesterday. refused. and today, it turns out that she kind

of refused, but halfway. that's how you said that talk about nuclear weapons is starting to sound a little clean. i thought listen. well, all the same, if god forbid it comes to this. what difference will there be? how much does gas cost, who sells it to whom and who pumps it where by reverse, and who earns how much on it, so uh, well, we will discuss this later after all. here, as it were, this story, look, biden, the one who woke up this morning in the white house he started talking about a lot of things and mainly about ukraine, he started talking about the same things you are talking about, he called on all parties to refrain from warnings about the possibility of using nuclear weapons. called them irresponsible. this is surprising to me, that he is on horseback, and the minister of defense called for the same thing. this is fine. it's like a country that arranged. here, this means an abscess,

which, uh, pumps him up with a weapon that says that she wants russia to collapse and so that they build something like this that has collapsed , well, they are talking with a nuclear power. yes, but at the same time somehow here they call on all parties to refrain from warnings not from the use. and from that is, you just don’t remind us here that you kept the nuclear chief minister, us secretary of defense austin, listen to the same thing. we have repeatedly said that this kind of rhetoric is very dangerous. nobody wants to happen with a nuclear war. this is a war in which all sides will lose, so saber-rattling, dangerous rhetoric is obvious counterproductive. and we won't do it. we will not deal with this, he says, the us secretary of defense, probably talking in absentia with the british secretary of defense, who was shaking

arms literally the day before yesterday. your opinion, biden and autumn, who do they talk to at first after apologizing for hiroshima and nagasaki before it also means here who tells us who and tells us what to do and the forest. they are of course, they are trying to talk over their heads through ukraine with russia so that, well, they don’t dare. we're here to intimidate someone that if something happens, according to russian military tactics, when there is a threatening situation for our security, we can use like that? they are very afraid of nuclear weapons. as a matter of fact, neither the supreme commander nor the minister of affairs lavrov, in which he attributes almost unwillingness to use the fenced, did not say so, so there is no need to call us to what we did not do, but they were frightened, and they were even more frightened that this are afraid of them. uh, european styles, this is ponata and ukraine itself, that's all. that's what e stands for ours, but you think, that's just how it seems to me that this is the main basic. well, first of all, how i,

of course, can be proud, that 4 days ago i wrote a whole text about this, in which i just admitted and explained. yes, first of all, if in the usa i think that they can prescribe the rules of warfare according to their patterns, according to which, on their part , a war that is not limited without any influence on them, into which everything will be drawn into the territory of ukraine and the purpose of this war to exhaust russia to the point where she admits defeat. and it came out of it and , accordingly, repeated itself, the most important scenario of the seventeenth year of the last century or the ninety- first year, this will not happen, because at the end of this particular scenario, russia will simply raise the stakes to those that will not be unacceptable for them for sure. but then you're now saying those words that are basically a biden reaction, and they justify austin, i mean, they kind of refer to you in your articles to this rhetoric, like,

guys. well, they convince me in this case. no, no, that's not possible. come on, we'll still fight, the way we want, yes, and we say listen to the whole point. uh, how would our answer is to spit like what you want, but then let's be objective then in a sense we really are. uh, as he says, uh, well, rattling or rattling, yes, nuke rattling , we have on it. vanya but, nevertheless , we rattle them. here the question arises, where does the moment begin, after which there may be they can and should slap, and how loudly, they need to slap, so that somehow it makes an impression on someone. we are now leaving with you on such a dangerous line, but nevertheless, as they say. yes , it seems to me that the impression has already been made, at least on the american side, and the reason is not that russia has made a number of some messages, but that you are already on the

verge of your behavior, but that the united the states are very worried. uh, for their stability in europe, for their control over europe, they they feel this way, because their plan now consists of two components: the first component is to slow down the liberation of ukraine, russia, genocification and demilitarization, to make russia weakened by the borders of the european union to their balkans, but the second, look like capital. wait, i'm trying to interfere with this, trying to interfere with us, they cannot. this is exactly what you described. and now we will continue that we want to do this and setting this task. they cannot but include in this task the conditions that they are dealing with a nuclear power. how does it fit into this concept? namely, that is why it is scary for them to lose control over the situation, if the poles climb somewhere, if the romanians climb somewhere, if amateur activity starts, then

control over the processes in europe will slip away for him, and russia will have a basis on the basis of the law of his doctrine. e, based on the fact that the borders were violated, e use any type of tactical weapons, including nuclear ones. that is, you also rattle. uh, in this case, i’m talking about what washington and these people are afraid of. concerns. where can they lead? yes, what are they afraid of, if chaos begins in a zone that remains stable, such as such a zone of e- protection of the shield from russia yes, well, such a moral shield, then an incomprehensible uncontrollable situation in the balkans may begin. it is not known what will happen in germany in france in general in central europe. it will be very bad for the american stock market and for the financial system, which now receives a lot of funds from europe because they are literally draining resources. from europe, they need to leave europe under their control, in order to further ruin it, their benefit

supports their financial system, so that capital is not interested in where the areas that they left to themselves under control, so that it is stable, so that no unmanaged processes. and all the more so because she did not go there in russia, and for this russia does not need to be provoked. you just need to exhaust her in their logic in ukraine, that is, do i understand you correctly that you are telling me that now comes the definition. that corridor within which they can, on the one hand, continue to wear down russia and pump resources out of europe, and on the other hand, not go so deep. where we can already start not only rattling, i will not lose europe and where will start themselves in unmanaged processes for them. in general, you are right, artyom. yes, we are talking about this impossibility or a corridor, as you say, when they could achieve these goals, wear us out, but not enter into a direct military clash that is dangerous for them and leave

full control over europe, including over financial flows, including tying it energetically to its expensive, but democratic raw materials, since we won’t go. and since we are talking about a corridor, in this case, since we are talking about us and about several other powers, this is a border corridor that we can move together, either here or there, and now we have found it. e. by the way, what did our minister of foreign affairs say about april 25th? he spoke about it sergey lavrov now, when the risks are real, but i mean nuclear war, they are very, very significant , i really don’t want these risks to be artificially inflated, and there are a lot of people who want such a serious danger. she is real and should not be underestimated. that is, in this sense, it is, of course, the question of one of the parts of this corridor, where and for what reason we will continue to look for it, you understand, it is not by chance that there is such a

saying, that the first thing that dies on the battlefield. is this plan plan uh, battles? yes, that's clear. something, what the americans planned, everything went wrong. now. really. i don't think it's just the americans. everything didn't go according to plan. this happens in this life, and now all their systems are flying tartars, taking into account the stalemate within the domineering united states themselves, and they are trying on the go. to improvise on improvise in this sense, we must give them their due, obviously completely, they are trying quite carefully, understanding what they can run into, because we have these red lines perfectly and very clearly designated. and so, when they tell us all the time that they and they are trying to interpret it, that we are bluffing. now they realized that we are not bluffing. and you say that we have marked them very brightly. and i apparently, at this moment i was distracted by something and missed it. but

what we have clearly and very clearly and understandably marked as a red line in this context. describe i copied it, they passed it on. yes, they passed it. we are ready, we are ready for this. we have begun our operation, and we take this into account is another matter, that we do not we rattle and don’t say a lot of superfluous words, that’s all academician sakharov, e., is credited with the idea that outside is not such a bad thing, because it was designed to stop wars. and in general, the academician, continued her thought in the context of the fact that it is so monstrous that it would simply never occur to anyone to actually apply it, that is, the concept of the realm of the possible is the concept of the realm of the impossible, and indeed for a long time atomic weapons belonged to everything - to something well , incredible, that is, people who are seriously considered scenarios of the third world with the use of nuclear weapons. they were considered to be such

a little wanderers, conspiracy theorists and so forth a while ago, mutually assured destruction. yes , that's right, and some time ago, a scientist at princeton university did the most detailed ever, a attempt to simulate what a nuclear war would look like right down to what they prescribed. how many people will die immediately, how many can die later? over nuclear what will be the epicenter of infection what will be the diameter of the mushroom cap? here, in fact, in the place that we now have here in the studio in ukraine , it is quite possible that they did all this in connection with a special military operation. excuse me, they sorted out a tactical strategic combination there, a tactical one, but, to which everyone will then begin to respond and it will just start to be such a mess, in fact, and moreover, there is also the university of chicago. there, these famous doomsday clocks hang, where they are, as it were, a military component with a political

trying to somehow mount. and they already have just an arrow there, but there are just a few minutes left until midnight, that is, a nuclear apocalypse for the sake of next to midnight. she has been dangling this arrow for a long time. here is the biggest was without fifteen minutes. this is when the collapse of the soviet union just happened, and then after the minsk speeches. it was after 2007 that strelka was getting closer and through, that is, in fact, and lavrov said a very correct thing that the number of mentions. indeed in this sense, lavrov's thought and the thought expressed by both austin and biden are intensified. they oddly enough, operate very much in such a synchronized format. that is, they say that it is not necessary endlessly, but to wake the beast, that is, it is not necessary, even this very possibility of making it verbalized is bad, because who knows how someone's psyche will work, we remind nine nuclear countries, which are far from all, of which are linked to the day, that is, the treaty on the

non-proliferation of nuclear weapons sixty eighth year. it's true, but, but on the other hand , yes, yes, please, where did you hide? sorry, by the way, for such a nuclear war pun. so , what goals the americans announced the day before , the americans announced the first goal is to completely deplete russia, yes, the second is to deprive it of any opportunities to threaten it in the future. to whomever, respectively, these goals are solved only through one single way. this is what is called decentralization disarmament decentralization, that is, the goal of disintegration, now they they say, guys, just don't talk about nuclear war. the main thing is not to say what the windows are called, the problem is that these two things contradict each other, and in the place where they collide, the nuclear war of the problem lies in the fact that some are rushing from this side, and the war is standing right here as soon as i say it again, as soon as there is any threat to them.

uh, the execution of the plan will ripen to some real implementation. we all saw this in this image of yours, that there is a war here, and to it rushing, but in this sense, she is now standing here and with her who is to her, from which side the war is on our side, as a warning and understanding that nothing will come of you guys. and as soon as you, uh, everything starts, and they keep trying to judge us, guys, as soon as you what? as soon as you start a real full-scale war on the territory of ukraine against us by transferring all types of weapons there, then by making the ukrainian army high-tech, by launching not single volunteers there, but tens of thousands of volunteers, and so then if we find ourselves in a situation where our, uh, existence will be in jeopardy, that is, well, let’s really say, if we are no longer dealing with 100,000, there are 150,000 ukrainian army, but already

half a million army. there will be without anyone there, again pmc volunteers of anyone who is armed with all weapons. whatever it is, that is, in fact, we will be in a state in your scenario. and in your scenario, this is still happening on the territory of ukraine and does not mean that this entire army, it somewhere starts to move here. no. pay attention ukrainians are already being pushed to the fact that, in principle, from what you actually limit yourself to representatives. yes, if they are pushed there even faster, but i think, after all, they may not reach this point, after all, with their brains, but they have already reached there. they are already a little far away shelling already shelling - this is the arrow, but only there we are already. we have already come so far. here, as if in these arrows somehow they are already trembling, but then tell me, please, eh. well, now, if they do it all here and this they do, but here you are this one of yours. i am now very much like what kind of feminism you are here, this is your own

, how would you translate the warning into reality, how would the goal where are you where are you going? and how would they be made to understand, not in words, but in deeds, that they have gone beyond this red line? okay, okay, i ask the question directly and in russian. if you think that everything has begun, then what you are talking about is a warning blow. where are you applying? in this case, for starters, according to the concept of our use of nuclear weapons, i put on a demonstrative nuclear attack in the stratosphere. that is, for everyone to see everything at a high altitude is performed. uh, the detonation of a nuclear weapon and everything becomes. it is clear to everyone to one went it can be seen from afar that the next ones will already be on the ground. yeah, and like everyone who is not everyone who does not understand. i didn't hide. who is not clear. yes, that is, or then removed, red tubes, they say, guys, stop. stop. let's still, well, as we saw during the cuban missile crisis, or we actually

saw this not only during the cuban missile crisis. i am i remember that i don't remember now what day a special military operation, when it was only announced that our deterrence forces were transferred to some other one. the next mode of carrying did not have anything in any case, because the main thing there is for everyone to get bogged down, because we would have strengthened it and the duty, but we did not translate. here i am talking about this, that i have increased combat duty. we've already expressed it, uh, evoked it. as if so-so effect. uh, a slightly different chandelier. you know, i can't imagine, as if the effect is a little different, because, by the way, other words were attributed to the same academician sakharov. in general, he was such a person, very kind, humane, but the highest professional in his field. he is credited with such words that he very clearly showed on the plans and figures where you can land e in a certain place in the ocean of a certain capacity, e, a charge at

which just a wave will wash away a lot of things in a country that we understand, but we will not name it, to say so ahead of time, how would they have, it's all. and you know, in fact, i was glad that, as it were, i swapped these blocks, somehow now, about gas, after all, gas, money, pipeline flows somehow. still, it seems to me that it was right, because , well, it’s still good when we have gas in our apartment and we are, in principle, ready for everyone to have gas in their apartment. well, everyone behaves rather strangely, because that's amazing. well, you know what we offered to everyone, as it were, please, here is our gas, we fulfill all obligations, but only for rubles, the european commission, by the way, did not mind, as if, winking at everyone from saying that well, as it were, yes, there are such opportunities. and here is the same biden, but the united states declares it will not allow the russian federation to use its oil and gas, in

order to avoid the consequences of the sanctions. the west is talking about what he, damn it, explains what it is about stopping gas supplies more and bulgaria is an example of using the russian one. walkie-talkies of the energy industry, as a weapon, this is again to the question that the guys for some reason are forced, handing over these tension situations. where they are not, because we all remember, we discussed it, what was offered to the poles, reminding the european union in brackets, the european commission does not mind buying gas for rubles, the poles of the city, like everything that the poles do, and what is actually the main thing their problems, because they proudly declare these absolute nonsense. forever. they said no, they don't need to. we will not take this non-democratic gas, and so on and so forth, after which they were warned that you would not take it for rubles, we will turn it off. eh means, uh also, at the same time, the bulgarians also did it. everything is the same . well, as it were, they seem to be so proud, well, they didn’t really want to there and suddenly to the question that we use something there and so on. and suddenly

today a couple of hours ago comes the most interesting news. this is called everything you wanted to know about the poles from the mouth of the official representative of gazprom, mr. kupriyanov, please. this week, poland refused to pay for gas supplies from russia under the new order in rubles, it was solemnly announced that russian gas is no longer needed and they will not buy it, but in fact this is not the case after the suspension of direct supplies, poland buys russian gas, but now in germany where it comes from in reverse to poland via the yamal gas pipeline our scheme of our principles of our interests, we don’t give a damn about all these somersaults of theirs and under the twists or this is a matter of principle. well, is it a matter of principle for you or for the poles for us, we, of course, do not give a damn. we have to look at this hmm carefully forever we do this with a

smile and a look, because the really amazing behavior of the poles why overpay to repeat the experience of the kiev regime, when it was possible to buy directly from russia in this way, but it is obvious that for them now at this stage, this some kind of political pressure on the russia they want well, how can i say? create a regime if they take the same volumes of gas from germany on the reverse. well, you said that they are concentrating troops and, uh, threatening others, more precisely, hint at something. excuse me, but i don’t really understand, that is, it turns out that we just need it, we don’t supply it in poland, we drive it to germany , respectively, there is something like 200 uh of our gas, they give it right. yes, the germans give theirs, that is , we somehow don’t have it in germany. in germany, it buys more gas than it needs at the moment and sells a little. later we consciously play along with this shlyakhin pride. well, this is

generally the history of the city and asked you. well, in the end , if we play along, then for god's sake germany has huge storage facilities. so now it's full, but now poland can only buy gas from these. storage, because germany is for german firms. we are currently selling the same. that is, if you want, buy for rubles, the germans partially began to buy for rubles, but they will have to, by the way, the italians also made a statement that hey, not the largest companies made a statement that they would in no case, or would have to buy a pole gas to the germans. yes, we either have to do something, then the poles germany can buy more gas, the further, the more gas russia somehow manages, let's not go into it. what a profit. she will sell it to the poles to me, to be honest, it doesn't matter, that is, roughly speaking, we are ready and that's fine. from the point of view of our interests

, to sell at least twice as much gas to germany, and they can distribute it, then to all latvians whether you are proud and independent finland, and so on. it’s just that i’m asking why, that, uh, it’s like they made a very funny cartoon, but it really reflects the situation that, as it were, at first everyone is so proud, and everyone is like independent and we don’t take russian gas, germany says, no, it’s calm, italy get out get out and go to take russian gas. well, that is, these are their games and entertainment. they should excite us or let them have fun there as they want. no their position is very absolutely for me. i understand. that is, what is allowed to jupiter is not allowed to the bull. we can put pressure on you economically and turn the valves in every possible way. and you should rejoice and just like that, absolutely turn the other cheek, numbers. just a thing, a stubborn twenty-first year share of gazprom. uh, actually imports in poland 55% in bulgaria 75%, they yesterday