it will remain that they have no idea where these weapons are going next, once they are in ukraine let's hear it. we can be sure that none of these weapons will fall into the wrong hands. we can do it somehow. in terms of accountability, we at this stage have to depend on the ukrainians to proceed from the fact that they will do the right thing, act prudently and carefully distribute the expression and accountable for them. i talked about this with the highest leadership. country. they assured me that it was important to them too. in general, all nikita’s assurances at the level of a gentleman should trust each other, listen, but it’s absolutely obvious that ukraine will be a big black hole, where some significant part, maybe even part of the military aid will leave , then it may end up on the black market. it may end up in the middle east in africa after all, all sorts of terrorist extremist groups can be used to use these weapons, but let's be blunt. uh. in this sense, i have a little bit of respect for my

senior comrade, and i don't agree that this help comes. and these are the latest sniper rifles, which are already firing from one and a half thousand m 1.600 m. this is not me saying, i am not a military specialist, but thank god i relate to communication with the guys who at the front they say that when they stormed, mariupol was already snipers worked for 1.5 km. and these samples are sniper. despite the fact that they are really piece goods. they still cause very big trouble to our guys, who, for example, storm the city in this regard. it seems to me that it is also very important to say that we still have certain, again, in this case i am broadcasting a point of view. i'm talking about a certain part of the society of guys who perform tasks on the ground, that we have the latest weapons, including sniper rifles, which not only can compete, but sometimes even better than ours, there are foreign analogues, but at the same time, difficulties with delivery registration in the mode of a special military operation complicates the possibility, but to transfer it to our

guys. this is a very important moment. show and you know, everyone knows that i have a friend dan to take care of the decks, then a serbian sniper who is in the fourteenth year on the territory of ukraine and performs tasks there. and now he is there lately. this situation has changed dramatically. they receive precisely the latest modern weapons, our domestic, which is not inferior to thermal imagers and thermal imaging sights and sniper rifles. there are still local problems on the ground. it's true that this needs to be said, but the situation started me in this regard. i want to say that rather quick managerial decisions. together with the reaction of civil society, this is also very important. it seems to me that ruslan will say this, we are raising funds and there is nothing wrong with sending the guys to the front, some elements of their equipment. this does not mean that we in the army do not have these samples at the level of this centralized process, it is sometimes hmm long in time, therefore, when it is checked on verified channels, uh,

all sorts of actions take place, which indicate that we are again collecting for a thermal imager, but something else, please, people who watch us, honestly, let's say there is a great need for a reaction from civil society in order to to support our officers to support our soldiers who perform combat missions and the third point is about just american help. it is important to look at the rifles, those rifles that our guys are now seizing as trophy weapons. yes use this first wave assistance. that's when the main decisions were made to increase military assistance with heavy weapons at the steimeier base. we remember that the entire western enlightened world gathered. e. i beg your pardon on the basis of rammstein, and so, again, according to western expert experts, the bulk of this weaponry will come to the front. if it comes, if we destroy the infrastructure again, and so on in early june by summer. therefore, the fact that now there are no high-quality american weapons there or there are

western weapons does not mean at all that it cannot appear. there after some time, therefore, in this case, the strategic task is what our armed forces are doing. this is the destruction of the infrastructure of the railway tracks, of course, the logistics must be disrupted, because logistics in this case fuels the war and the west is determined to ensure that this hot phase continues until the last ukrainian, so it is very important that every day our calibers are destroyed and fuels and lubricants are destroyed, warehouses are destroyed with weapons, and in this case, it seems to me, this is a tactic when they will not be incombustible. when they have a shortage of shells, just the next run will give a very big effect. oksana, you talk a lot with americans with american journalists. and in general, in general, you perfectly understand how the mentality for them is the supply of weapons to ukraine. is this a business or is it real? how do they consider aid to democracy. well, i think it's much more complicated now. i just uh a few days ago uh wrote an interview with

a former aide to obama in 2014 who just then it tore and the metal that russia is to blame for everything. and now he is already and he is already a very concerned about, er, the situation and the real prospect of an exchange, if not strategic nuclear strikes, then at least tactical ones. i think there are different positions in the united states a. and by the way, the people who used to be in the biden administration are very proud, very arrogant people with very high. and with self-conceit, we have ideas about ourselves, as about the lights, not just democracy. but the immortals say they think they put themselves on the place of god in fact the whole war, it seems to me, now about whether the united states should preserve the place of god that tells the whole world, like life or not, and it is very difficult to part with the projection of god. well, it's often easier to destroy everything around than to part with it, but i would like to add that and here you are discussing this. uh,

there is a supply of shell casings, but it seems to me that it is quite obvious that ukraine has been for the past few years. well, at least 15 years, the main one, and such a player on the black market armaments and even the americans there a few years ago there was a great american investigation that established. that it was from ukrainian factories that components for intercontinental ballistic missiles came, and north korea had missiles that, by the way, could reach the united states in syria in libya, and there were old soviet weapons that were delivered through ukraine and there were soviet oh, soviet and ukrainian snipers . there is a large cohort there, and people who well were soldiers and good luck, and not only men, but let's say they are female ukrainian snipers, they are known, but i think that in fact, uh, well, we have come to a very dangerous point, and i see

more and more talk in the western press there that, of course, yes. here, using strategic nuclear weapons, it's bad, as it were, yes, it's scary and not everyone believes in it, but a possibility, but more and more authors are talking about, uh, something tactical nuclear strike is not strategic , and tactical small nuclear weapons. quite to myself, let's say you know i do and i will do it specially at this place reservation. we often raise this issue, an important and necessary head of russia will never be the first to use nuclear weapons. we must know everything in the west, including literally the moment if such a strike was delivered under because everything we talked about is now being worked on to escalate, yes, both from our side and from their side, and now the strategy in america is thinking about how they argue that russia is one way or another a rational player. what does an irrational player mean. is it that the damage from the use of nuclear weapons will be greater than

admitting his own defeat. and you, the lord , you can say that russia can recognize, for example. now, if a tactical strike was inflicted on russia, russia will be able to stop at that moment. let's see the question is raised correctly and it also needs to be answered calmly in such things. when a nuclear war is going on, as a discussion of it, it does not need to be raised to the level of panic and application simply because it is impossible, firstly our air defense and means. uh, and pro missile defense works great. and on -tuned this time. second, we are the first ever we won't hit if someone tries. should we apply something? i think that the answer will be adequate for the european union only for the last 10 weeks. now, if we talk about the fact that they pump up not only their states there, but also the european union, uh, over the past 10 weeks it has provided 4 billion euros to support ukraine. the chairman of the european commission will call on this on friday. oh von der line. let's listen to her. in the last 10 weeks alone, the european union has contributed

4 billion euros to support ukraine. for europe, the conflict is worth a lot on the canon of ukraine. in this country is more than a stress test for the eu economy ukrainians. defend european values ​​the european union through sanctions will do everything to deprive russia of sources of income and raise the price for it for the events in ukraine, well, pumped up with money and then inexhaustible opportunities. yes , the prime minister of ukraine confirmed with money that kiev has received more than $12 billion in assistance in the form of weapons and finance since february 24, and zelensky continues to insist that western countries should actually take them on their balance sheet and pay they get seven billion dollars a month, this is a normal business. they came up with good ones for themselves, that is, it is clear that any war is big business and it is clear that any war operators. eh, they're coming out. after her, the billionaire and zelensky will not be an exception. and there is nothing to be surprised here. here one can

only speak of what we have seen during these months. and maybe even over the past month, more like a sly, that notorious, red line, about which we talked a lot, yes, that's not the entry, the west into the war directly. yes this red, the line is erased, slowly blurred. first, it is washed out by javelins, then by these sniper rifles, then it will go in june. uh, heavy weapons, then they discuss the issue of tactical strikes. that is, the west is actually step by step without declaring a non- declarative grandfather. biden, ursula vonderlein does not say anything, all the more so, but step by step, and the west not only pays for the ukrainian war, but the west itself really takes part in this war and should be considered by everyone us as a belligerent. but we already have, uh, we

have our defense minister sergei shoiguz said on monday. if i’m not mistaken, yes, well, this week it’s about the fact that any vehicle of the nato countries that seems to be on the territory of ukraine with the supply of weapons for this country will be destroyed, but for now we are talking about the territory of ukraine precisely because this is a specially military operation, and not a war involving, including the west, can i just supplement my colleagues. uh, it's actually really good that we're starting off calmly. talk about nuclear discourse in nuclear scenarios and nuclear options because. what is now the strategy of the west and the tactics of ukraine e that russia will never be a tribe? this means that nuclear weapons, as it were, do not exist, that there are some models that are in the mines, they are, as it were, but we are not collecting all this to use them. this is our limiting factor. this is the most important thing, and with that blurring of the red line, about which i spoke, they too why do they intensify the discourse and

demand from us that russia’s wife rattle there nuclear weapons and so on, because they understand that leaving nuclear weapons completely out of the question gives them a better chance on the battlefield. that is, they can, uh, they’ll shoot now, junk junk, by the way, uh, in vain we say that it shoots one out of four there, but 1,000 of four shoots and kills the world’s inhabitants of our guys. so there is nothing good here either, in this. uh , what shoots badly, and then, and they will, uh, these guns will go, yes, 155 mm planes will definitely follow them, and the unmanned zone after all, no one is talking. eh, we drove through for the first time. i think that the issue of erasing the red line step by step, without the nuclear factor, gives them an advantage and will give them more and more advantage every month. it's in theory in practice. everything, it turns out more difficult than yura, he achieves something by pumping money and weapons. well, i have a

feeling that the west really. well, as they say, in the people the fear is lost yes to them that they can endlessly raise the stakes confrontation with us in the hope that we are some second, we stop or break or what? as a colleague said, there is a vatsena in the hope of our sobriety. here, but at the same time they themselves do not demonstrate their sobriety. they don't allow. well, i just want to remind the west that over the past 10 years, russia has demonstrated more than once that it is capable of a lot of things that are not expected of us, crimea once, syria two ukraine today three. i think similar things. you would have to bring them to their senses and for a second, after all, our western enemies, we used to call them partners, neighbors. not, enemies. and we didn't name them. they called us enemies. this, in principle, probably, is part of the mentality of a russian person, that we, as it were, will not call a person an enemy until he himself shows you as our enemy and calls us. but, and i would like to add here again everything that we are talking about in today's statement by patriarch kirill. he said today, now i will

quote. all believers pray to prevent a new global conflict, that is, in fact, the third world. what is world war iii let's just think for a second. what are the prospects? what is it for? may result? the same world war iii world war i it is clear what the second world war fought for is also understandable. today is world war iii when there are a huge number of nuclear powers, you know, there, huh? i think this is my opinion, as the medici, as a person who works on channel one, that the third world war is already on for information here the question is not about weapons, there is a struggle for the minds and souls of people, and here the use of weapons is an important part, well, much information is more important. you remember, yes the last argument of kings. what is this war? i uh, so about all the same. i don’t want to escalate the situation in any way, but we just need to at least think about it and, to be more precise, maybe we don’t, fortunately, have such a serious genetic memory. we

have already gone through so many warriors as grandfathers and great-grandfathers, by the way, i want to tell you, by the way. today may 6th is saint george's day. i want to congratulate everyone on this great holiday at forty. in the fifth year, absolutely faithful patrons of moscow i want to remind you that in the forty-fifth year, st. george's day just coincided with easter, also on the sixth day, and therefore, on the occasion of the forty-fifth year, st. george's day was moved to a celebration 3 days later, this is always done on may 9. here we have a holy holiday ahead of our victory which inspires us all, of course, guys, i have no doubt that we will win. here's the truth. i think that we will definitely defeat such people both here and in russia. here the question is , that as soon as possible our enemies are understood. i think they understand. head of the people's squad, dpr vladimir taranenko vladimir hello, you will be with us, yes, hello vladimir. yes, yes, in general, looking at the weather in

donetsk, i would like to say that there is a peaceful sky overhead, but, unfortunately, this is not yet quite the situation. tell me what's new. and we are working on a new one, and now the people's squad has been active in mariupol, and that is, literally since march 20. and we went there, but came from a humanitarian mission. and now we are open. several help centers mariupol, where we provide, but all kinds of help to people, that is, this is the issuance of gumnars of food products , bread before the provision of medical care, and some administrative services, that is, everything you need, charging mobile devices, issuing sim cards. at our centers, and we work to the maximum in order to cover all the needs, and directly of the citizens of mariupol, in addition to this. and now we are actively working with them, that is, we now have about 450, and the active person is precisely

mariupol residents, and who are with us, and with the people's squad, but are actively engaged. like sorting out, uh, blockages cleaning the streets, and, of course, now on the eve of the may 9 holiday, we are restoring monuments. and we have the same situation not only in mariupol, but in principle, but in new, let's say in liberated cities, and such as the granite volnovakha starognativka, but similar work is underway, that is, already in order, and 12 monuments have been restored, but completely a and we continue to this day. that is today now guys, how since they are doing it, and this is mariupol vladimir what is most lacking for residents in mariupol. here are the requests that the people's squad come to you most of all? ah, well, of course now, but let's say extremely. so e is relevant, and this is a question of water,

and that is, ah, we are constantly working, constantly improving, that is, today literally, and they brought it. uh, there are 204 more in mariupol, and the containers, that is, these containers, together with the administration of the city of mariupol, are being placed, and in, let's say, crowded points, but in order for people, there was water, and besides this, of course, i am also interested in the issues of restoring employment. and questions when the light appears, well, that is, in fact, but people, but are ready, but, it turns out, they are maximally ah-ah, ready to act. they are ready to help. that is, let's say the number of activists all the time. we are increasing every day more and more, because people already a-a want to return to, let's say so peaceful. ah, a normal life, and they want to prove themselves, to get closer, let's say, to this moment as soon as possible.

thank you very much vladimir for your work, you do what we tell you with us in direct communication. from donetsk there was the head of the people's squad, vladimir taranenko, and here you need to pay attention, when i asked what requests people have, he says employment people want to work. they are tired. from this situation, they need to recover and work, and we return to our geopolitical issues, important big british defense minister ben wallis said that, it turns out, now ukrainian military personnel can teach english let's listen. ukrainian military personnel may be involved in training british soldiers after the war with russia lessons learned from hunting russian tanks and aircraft with western-supplied weapons would be valuable to the british armed forces ukrainian forces have. what can france teach us, explain to us the position of the minister of defense, what

can they teach, and what can the ukrainian military teach the british about how to take civilians hostage? no, this is a big question. more seriously. to be honest, i would and would not scoff at what he says, the british minister of defense , firstly, he knows that the ukrainian military are russian people, and russian people have always been able and knew how to fight, especially having combat experience, therefore, based on this component, it is better than the russian people, but i do not separate, do not divide them into ukrainians and russians, this is my opinion of the belarusians, and they know how to teach, the second e is clear that in these conditions they should put this armament when we are in the previous chat if we talked about weapons, then i would just like to orient everyone about the situation in which we find ourselves, including with the conduct of a special military operation. she strangely minata and washington

prepared for 8 years, and they had two options. the first option that they wanted to use was the eighth year option, when on march 8 there, according to their plans, a massive strike was carried out with the use. e hmm weapons of mass destruction of tank artillery units on the territory of russia and uh, here, uh, including the crimean peninsula with this yes, but the response. it would be exactly the same as it was in south ossetia when the georgian brigade entered tskhinvali in 40 minutes, all the world's leading media said that russia attacked georgia. and we have only three days later. e managed to get through the kador gorge by breaking through the engineering troops. through the mountains pass, because go through the tunnel.

we couldn't, it could have happened in such a way that, after going through some part, they had already accused us and united us, and they would cut us off, and we would just lost. we were forced during this time, the engineering troops of russia performed a miracle by breaking through this road. and bringing in the troops. in just 3 days today similar should have happened. this year with us and in ukraine. and when we began to conduct, the most proactive special military operation. uh, of course, for them it was a worse option, but nevertheless it was enough to try to discredit us with an informational psychological operation, while the weapons you are talking about, including ammunition, which should be supplied for heavy weapons. they for 8 years on the sly. they didn’t take it, sniper

systems, javelin singers. they were brought in in great numbers. and andrew is right . being there at the battlefields near each house, three or four used tubes lay near the window . here are these u ammunition. this suggests that they simply verbally began to justify that they were importing and, so to speak, a continuation, in fact, they were preparing and imported to us, they were preparing this war and we are special military operation, realizing that tactically today we are losing informationally. we will still bring it to its logical conclusion and win. as for the statement of the e-minister in e. defense of great britain well, it is necessary that these trained fighters after a special military operation reach england . see. you repeatedly. now they were talking about the fact that we had been preparing this for a long time. yes, they

don't really hide it. look what the military analyst said. on air on fox news in 2015 7 years ago, listen. already in ukraine it's all settled, the only way the us can have any influence in the region and turn the tide is to start killing russians, but given the level of support we're giving the ukrainians and the ability of the ukrainians themselves to mount a counterattack against the 12,000 russian soldiers entrenched in their territory, unfortunately, it is unlikely that this will happen, but they found a video of seven years ago , moreover, they did not hide their plans and intentions. i just want to remind you that we are in the same the studios discussed how, in fact, an outpost was created in ochakovo thanks to which the british could be quickly transferred to the british naval forces in the black sea

, and they repeatedly talked about this, they wanted ukraine in this case, well, to be an integral part their navy. therefore, the fact that it was the british who militarily mastered the territory of ukraine, created the infrastructure, pumped up weapons, i just want to remind you that this minister ben woli with his own guys the pranksters vovan and lex played a prank and in fact he was talking about the fact that he would treat him. well, i can say in a popular way he was divorced. but he gave out a lot of interesting information, he said that he would turn to boris johnson in the context of ukraine having nuclear weapons. he once again confirmed at that time that the territory of ukraine would be constantly uninterruptedly supplied on tours, ufos would be supplied in this case, it was the british instructor - this is also extremely important british instructors on the territory of poland is already teaching ukrainian officers and soldiers to use british weapons. now i'm not talking about what quality, because many really scold ufos there. whether it's true or not, it doesn't matter. the very fact

that it is britain that plays the first fiddle in pumping up, and ukraine with weapons and moreover, is now the british. they are trying with all their might to present themselves as the main defenders of western civilization, and unlike the united states of america, for example. britain is ready to give guarantees to finland sweden who want we will not forget that britain although this is not the british empire yes a hundred years ago, a is a member of the nuclear club let's not forget that britain is in this case. uh, the military-military point of view also has advanced technology. and the fact that it is the british who want to turn ukraine into a permanent war zone. in this regard, by the way, he also addresses the internal audience of the minister of defense. why because he says our weapons that we supply in ukraine are will be run in they will be used by an understanding of how effective it is against russian aircraft against russian tanks. and when excuse me at such a high level, it

is the british minister of defense who speaks. this once again convinces, but it seems to me that everyone present is that they are really going to fight with us. that is, now it is pumping, but then, as soon as enough experience is accumulated, that which can be transferred is already shaved. the military will use the same experience against us in the hot phase of the conflict, and i think this is a very dangerous signal and to confirm this is your words that they are going to, well, confront us. eh, in fact, there are already postcards today. it is known that washington, at the request of kiev , provided information about the location of the flagship of the black sea fleet, the russian cruiser. moscow is reporting this, and it is important to emphasize this. uh, the american media in particular the washington post, citing their sources. and after that, the pentagon officially denies this information literally right there in kirby's words let's hear let's, let's hear what else yesterday was about to tell, because that's where the story doesn't really end

about the cruiser. it was today. but yesterday, the american edition of the new york times once again confirmed that the united states is ready to help the independent, not only weapons. it's another publication that reports it to the new york times this week. they reported that while the united states had already provided ukraine with intelligence that helped the country kill several russian officers, then is there any data related exclusively to the murder of russian officers. that is, they were led, they were followed, and according to the american press, again, and the new york times, in particular, insists on this, they destroyed our officers. unfortunately he says so. let's hear what john cyberbe , a pentagon spokesman, has to say on this subject. we provide intelligence to ukraine so that they can defend their country, but we do not we participate in decision-making to determine targets

for the ukrainian military, this is the game of the americans. uh, through the media they throw in, and for several days in a row it happens that we provide intelligence. here we indicated the moscow cruiser, where is the ukrainians given data to russian officers, destroyed, and then, uh, the pentagon says, no, it's not us. no. we didn't. i don’t believe in such a game for vera. it seems to me that this is just a consequence of the fact that inside, and the biden administration, there is also, as it were, a fight bulldogs under the carpet, because well, it is quite obvious that the current american president's cognitive form is bulldogs. and maybe we might not be bulldogs. maybe there i don't know dragons or anyone scarier around here, but obviously they are easy to manipulate. he is not capable. well, outwardly, you don't seem to need to be, uh, a big mental health specialist to understand that, well, a person is already due to age. at least the western american elite use it, people who are

around him, but it is clear that, while they are trying. they pursue their interests in our territory. i would like to return to what nikita was talking about, by the way, i recently returned from pakistan, it turned out that i was the last international journalist who was interviewed by imran khan before the americans dropped them and many others. uh, i also talked with many military heads of intelligence who were there, and there are several services, and in pakistan, and they all openly say that and in ukraine, the americans and especially the british carry out the so-called pakistani scenarios, let me remind you and france data. i think to confirm that at one time, when the americans needed the help of pakistan against, and the soviet troops in afghanistan, they so politely looked down and allowed. uh, pakistan well, to acquire nuclear weapons, and no one hid this, in fact. after

that, pakistan fit in with the americans for a very long time. lost tens, thousands of people lost, and even, probably, the bill goes to hundreds of thousands. and there is infrastructure loss in development and so on. now, by the way, speaking, here at this stage. uh, the same imran khan said we don't want to fit in with the americans anymore. we do not want them to play their wars, but as soon as he said this, he was led to the resignation of the stand. there was such a gentle procedure, let's say so, but in general a is understandable.