make way taiga prokhor gromov is coming a bad man wants to deceive you. i cant. i don't want to be like that. river cinema 1tv represents that dear, because you are near

the object of your emphasis, only one wife does not notice him. roller coaster premiere of the serial film sorry, one man did not pass the movie one tv presents i collect things. go away, this is a joke. no , it's not a joke, wali gave the keys, but this does not mean that you can come as if you were at home. because of this freaks, i had to bang him right in the restaurant. so, if you did something on order, you understood?

again here, so we have at least 9 similar episodes of unsolved murders, the victims were strangled, the killer used their property documents and disappeared for a long time. money transfer fedor went to the post office to send letters to the dead, most likely sent a transfer. they met there, well, then the mail should have the name of the sender.

hello mommy. i'm soon

aside to check every centimeter we must not miss it. he covers his tracks. he wore things old man, there he was a fisherman with tents

hermit. at the veterinarian's house, he not only changed his clothes everywhere the order of the spit from sweat book magazine, razor, shoe polish, logging, urban villager is now an insurance agent, i don't care. why is he doing this? i think he's just covering his tracks. he reincarnates fedor fell in love with his sister. his father inspired him that he is a monster peter hates himself taking someone else's life the fate of habit. he tries to stop being himself. he is his protection. see what's wrong here. usually when fedor leaves, he leaves the victim's things, where the things are insurance agent. the victim has a family, her mother has already been reported, they lived together. i need insurance agent details. where are you from? 60 km from here? have

n't seen you yet. nurse your disgusting woman . her feet won't be here anymore. let's. what's the matter? if you don't eat, you'll never get better. come on, at least a few spoons, come on. here

we are waiting for someone. criminal roses and there's no one here. i was sure. ok. does anyone come to you? i can't be left here alone. get the woman admitted to the hospital, then set up an ambush.

i want to see your boss. bye. take

this old, cold, ventilated room . i have to type a lot. does the secretary look like those fidgety girls who sit in the receiver? do you see women love writers? i knew one writer. something happened to him. i don’t know, i

definitely stopped writing. come on, it wasn't easy. and then i cut it off, but i'll tell you why. some people say that war is evil, they don't understand a damn thing. only when you are in close proximity to death, when you you can take it into account with the back of your head, then you really feel life, and compared to this feeling , this is all like a rotten, smelly fish. in the end , they took him already for an attempted murder, but then they could not identify the documents; he did not have himself; he refused to call the forty-fourth. he fled, after which they began. all these murders i will hand over to my comrades from the state security. let them figure it out. everything

is decided by the human factor, our war is still going on. this is the captain of the criminal investigation department, comrade kazantsev, and we will smash the enemy until until our country gets rid of those who prevent its citizens from living peacefully and accomplishing a labor feat. hello, where is your sister? she went out of town, there are competitions on boats. she often goes there and doesn't leave you alone. i'm an adult. look, i heard there was an accident with your sister's husband. they say

which of us can say to myself, i know who i am in a dream about father's apartment, dressing his clothes, drinking his port wine, not live, if i myself am someone else's life, on the other hand, right now, letting my fate take its course. i feel something real so which of my lives.

good evening on the air, the big game as russia makes more and more military gains in ukraine, the united states is stepping up policies aimed at weakening and causing maximum damage to russia, that is, waging a proxy war against russia, the house of representatives of congress today approved the allocation of ukraine an additional package nearly $40 billion in aid. this is even $7 billion more. what the white house originally requested before as a kind of gift to russia on victory day president biden signed the lend lease act,

which allows the executive branch of the united states to decide on the supply of certain weapons to ukraine without congressional approval, and finally, the united states is already open. they say that they see no prospects, but russian-ukrainian negotiations on a political settlement of the conflict, at least in the short term, about this in particular yesterday at a hearing in congress. avril heights, the director of national intelligence of the united states, said, and today we will talk about the nature and prospects of the biden administration's policies on russia's possible reaction to these policies and the future of the world . dmitry good evening. and dmitry well, yesterday , president biden said that russia is allegedly in a stalemate in ukraine. he said that's in his opinion. russia does not supposedly have a

way out of this conflict, and it will think. and what to do with it, but it's working out for me the impression that the biden administration itself is in a hopeless situation, because look, the united states is supplying military assistance to ukraine, which russia is systematically grinding at the same time, while continuing offensive operations, it is achieving serious tactical successes sanctions that the collective west imposes they are, of course, painful, but nonetheless . they are not able to bring down the russian economy at the same time, but in the world. uh, uh, everything, not not one, but practically a country outside a serious country outside the collective west has not joined in the condemnation of russia to anti-russian sanctions, that is , the situation is developing west yes, as it were, the west is not against the west yes, and the west in its anti-russian hybrid war, in fact, remains, but

russian society is alone, yes, the russian elite has consolidated. uh, public support has consolidated. the special operation of president putin is growing, that is, there are no prerequisites for revolutionary sentiments and uh, especially regime change, and this raises the question. doesn't this policy lead to harassment russia, which the biden administration is trying to lead to exhausting the collective west itself, because this policy of exhausting russia could work if russia really suffered a military defeat, which is completely out of the question if russia really collapsed economically and politically. and this, too, but extremely unlikely, is not worth it. whether in the current situation, the biden administration itself is already looking for an exit stretch. yes, that is, as if the possibility of some possibility

of completing this conflict and getting out of it, what what do you think about this dmitri dmitri you have put it very well. uh, how the situation looks from moscow a, but you started by saying that you mentioned that washington sees it very differently. and although washington is more visible a little more complicated than impressions can sometimes get, when you look, that's just uh, headlines that are really uh, trying to show that u russia is defeated and is almost in a hopeless situation. well, in general, of course, fortunately people in the administration biden, there are also very competent ones who still look at the situation more realistically. look at those released just yesterday. uh, report. uh, national intelligence office. no, the cia is such an oversight, coordinating organization over

the entire american intelligence community. and the head of this office testified in congress and, uh, there was much more, uh, from my point of view, a nuanced realistic picture, there is, of course, uh, emotional uh and moral assessments of what russia is doing naturally, regular mentions russian aggression, and so on, without this, no one can now talk about this conflict. if you don’t want to be accused of being putin’s agent, but in fact it says that the russian offensive continues, that in some areas russia has noticeable tactical successes, that it cannot be ruled out that the russian operation after the donbass will expand by south and can even reach. uh, odessa so

no. i don't think that, uh, serious people in the biden administration are already playing parade marches, eh, but what to do with russia in this situation? i don't think they know about it, because congress says just mentioned pressuring the administration to do more and be more efficient. and again, it was casually mentioned that 40 billion is a lot of money. if you are talking about helping another country, which is not even an american ally, but biden wanted a little less, imagine the house. and told him no, to spend more is contrary to the usual congressional commercial. i know only one country for which the congress was on, if you want such financial generosity, and this, of course, is israel, although even there it was about sumy noticeably, uh, less and, uh, in the

administration. eh, there are now two attitudes that somewhat contradict each other, and one attitude that you just mentioned. and that it is necessary to press vigorously on russia, even now they say that there are no prerequisites for reaching an agreement and dmitry if the administration believed that russia had already been defeated. you probably would then prerequisites for an agreement with there were no points in washington, they say, so far there is no such situation. what is called on the battlefield? which would force russia to make those concessions that are required by the collective west, but what is interesting is that any agreement. it should not only be acceptable to ukraine, but , as it were, uh, it seems that ukraine was proposed, as they

say, and ukraine should sit here on the consoles and press the buttons. well, i understand such a desire to go towards ukraine, which is portrayed as victims of innocent aggression, and as a country that fights heroically, and david against goliath. if i may say so, i understand it. but on the other hand. ukraine did not impose sanctions against russia , but proposed these sanctions, and lobbied for these sanctions, but it was not she who accepted them and it would be very strange if russia went, at least from my point of view it would be strange if russia went to an agreement on the ukrainian crisis, which would not include sanctions. and this what kind of agreements, of course, should moscow discuss with washington and brussels, and not with kiev well, the last one is very important. but on the one hand

, they say that you can guess until, uh, if you want, combat luck will not, uh, help ukraine yet. uh, huge us and other nato military aid won't start working. here, let's wait and then there will be, accordingly, uh, more favorable conditions for the contract, built on the new russian flexibility, by the way, about the fact that, uh, this includes the fall of the putin removal regime, i have not heard from anyone else, who would have had to do to the administration. is there enough a lot of crazy people in print. and it certainly looks very, if you will. not even worthy, because we are talking about very serious things and such chatter. well, let's face it, regime change doesn't help a serious conversation, as the task of the administration, no one talks about it, well, in congress

they talk about it in the house of representatives in the senate, but you're right. this is not being talked about in the administration, some people are talking about it in congress, but dmitriy, you know, the united states of america 's political system is very good at congress. it legislative organization. this is not an organization that is recognized to formulate concrete policy and, most importantly, not an organization that assumes responsibility for the consequences of american concrete policy. and there, of course, someone might very much want to overthrow putin, uh, and for what is called, and russia to come to the united states and offer it publicly. uh, repent and recognize american leadership and not just recognize it, but ask it with gratitude, but it's clear that this is not belongs to the sphere of realpolitik in the sphere of realpolitik about regime change in russia

the specific objectives of us policy no such issue yet. i think it won't. but as for the american approach to this war, and the american approach remains the same , biden talks about this, other officials say . this is war. they say they don't mean the united states and russia is not a hybrid war between the united states and russia is not a hybrid war. uh between uh, russia and nato is everything between russia and ukraine well, yes, in that, uh, from the point of view of washington, that i understand this point of view, which, uh, is, among other things, very convenient and very uh to reassure the average american, uh, voter who is told that here we are helping ukraine attack the russians and defend themselves against the russians, but this does not

threaten america in any way. but the thing is, dmitry help me. uh, i have the impression that moscow sees it differently and that moscow believes that russia is objective, that it is challenged by collective west led by washington and count. that you can do anything against russia, and the russian response will be limited to the ukrainian theater, which would be more than a few. uh, so unrealistic dmitry you are absolutely right. it seems to me that a very important problem is that, at least at the level of rhetoric, we are considering. this is a military conflict in different ways and when the united states. they talk exclusively about the russian-ukrainian conflict, russia officially and this really reflects the russian vision speaks of a hybrid the war about the collective west about the hybrid war of the united states and its allies, and the proxy war

against russia, the deputy said about this yesterday, if my memory serves me right, and dmitry polyansky, the representative of russia in the un, he said there are no doubts. this is a proxy war of nato against russia. earlier, russian foreign minister sergey viktorovich lavrov said about the same thing, if my memory serves me right in an interview with you just when you were interviewing him, but, being in moscow, and now, when one side talking about conflict between the west and russia, while the other side refuses to acknowledge this at the level of rhetoric. this is a very dangerous situation that can really lead to loss of control over e. this escalation and, from the russian point of view, the american rhetoric and that we have nothing to do with this body at all, that because we do not pull the trigger. we are not involved, but in the war against russia and that ukraine has been

given full carte blanche, but also on what weapons will be supplied to it and what position it should take in the course of negotiations with russia and in general, how the end of this conflict will be from the russian point of view, this is hypocrisy, this is a hypocritical approach that does not reflect the real intention and real policy of the united states, just as the american rhetoric on nato expansion did not reflect their real, but their real policy . yes, because the rhetoric was that the open door policy is just a reaction to the desire of other countries to join the north atlantic alliance. in reality, we know that all decisions to expand and not expand nato expand or not. to expand, to whom to expand, when it is nato member countries and the united states, in particular, who accept expansion. yes, and the

same thing about the ukrainian conflict from the russian point of view behind all the actions on the supply of weapons. what kind of weapons to supply to ukraine, what kind of position to take in these negotiations is the united states, and you are right. but this discrepancy, if you like, this miss sword, and at the level of rhetoric and conviction of the united states that since they, as i said, do not directly pull the trigger. yes, and they do not inflict a physical blow on russian servicemen, then they control the situation. this is a very erroneous and dangerous misconception. and about this, by the way, speaking of quite recently, the other day i wrote a very correct article about in the foreno fairs magazine. uh, the president of the eurasia group is aan bremer, and the article is called the new cold war. can it get hot? let's listen to what mr.

brenner wrote. at the moment, the international community is facing a war that has no agreed mechanisms to prevent escalation, yet american and european leaders believe they can control the conflict. they continue to impose tougher sanctions on russia send lethal weapons to kiev share real-time intelligence with the ukrainian military encourage further nato expansion and talk space will really reduce the risk retaliation from russia in fact putin regards these moves as acts of war against russia the longer the war goes on, the harder it will be for each side to keep the fighting from escalating into a more global conflict. dmitry

well, you see, what we are talking about, we are in fact more and more penno, and is reflected even in the internal american discussion of a similar point of view. a growing number of experts are beginning to speak out. when do you think this point of view will reach, before the administration, when it comes to the understanding that if russia understands this conflict as a hybrid war against itself on the part of nato, then sooner or later russia may not respond to ukraine, but to that side of that opponent to the enemy who wages war against it. i'm not talking about russia being able to strike some kind of military strike, but against, uh, the united states and their allies. after all, there can be a lot of tools, a lot of ways to cause damage. that's when the biden administration, in your opinion, will come to this understanding.