as it turned out, you know, this is the wording of the defenders of mariupol, and it seems to me that it’s not just that now it’s being dropped and fixed in the international public consciousness, because when they come out, and i think that there will still be a group of those who e , he would prefer life, but instead of death, they will come out and there will be a military tribunal in court, it is one thing to judge the nazis, notorious murderers of a cutthroat, and another case for the defenders of mariupol, imagine, yes, europe, including two big differences. yes please, further clarification about media strategy. here is this gesture about what it is carefully. they are planned. moreover, the action can even be called a performance. notice it 's not the wife here. azov became a person immediately stood up, this mr. pyotr verzilov is a media artist who is famous for his perverts, and for various actions that actually do not fit into any moral principles at all. say, but different theologians. and

the catholic church uh for the pope anyway - it's unacceptable to date a man who is essentially an exhibitionist stock, and he's already a long-time defector who left the united state of america works, uh, as a leading specialist in media strategists and documentaries, and the united states of america therefore, this is another such small proof that this is not even so much a media character. how much even performative is some performance art. this is modern history. we have at all the meaning is that he has spectators are properly grateful spectators, who are the appreciative spectators of this performance. i think petra's handlers were big. i think that, in principle, those groups that control the ukrainian nationalists. this is good, how to say it, noble viewers to tell, yes, gratitude, yes, ignoble, but grateful viewers who are satisfied with the result of this media permas. it's made you don't feel that, probably, you need more and more and for this performance, then look, you need to consume this

information. look, these wives of azov give. interview to which publication? well, of course , the british edition, uh, the newspaper for the telegraph, and that's what they said. azov was ready to be surrounded, but he hoped that the ukrainian armed forces in the cities close to mariupol would stand unshakably, this did not happen, yulia says they allowed the russian army to capture the cities around mariupol, she even suggests that vladimir baranyuk. the commander of the ukrainian thirty-sixth marine brigade in mariupol had close ties with the russians, he turned out to be a traitor and got into russian captivity even when the marines still had weapons to fight aleksey alekseevich of azov. they begin to be military analysts. i'm getting uncomfortable. actually. that's very interesting. e is a phrase thrown by the notorious wives of the azov people. it was the chairman, not the president, who rushed to the address from the esoteric. uh, value protection. aha note , well understandable reasons. uh, master can

not defend western values ​​by definition, therefore. i think the calculation was made on the fact that he , to one degree or another, would either remain silent, or refuses, so that later it can be presented as a non-negotiable. the chinese side, that is , the information processing is already beginning. uh, well, russian it starts with information processing on dehumanization. china that it does not share western values ​​- this needs to be addressed, and so on. generally, judging by the context of what is happening. now i have a strong impression that nato usa britain does not count, not only does not count, but does not want, even, well, a hypothetical the victory of ukraine is necessary to create an e situation. uh, the apocalypse in this area. what is it for? the fact is that if ukraine is, as they say, stand firm and even defeat russia somewhere, there will be nothing to intimidate europe with, there will be no reason for countries to supply american weapons and

deploy contingents at their military base. eh, it is necessary to create now on the one hand. e create ukrainians. uh, but the illusion that they are winning so that they continue to fight, but on the other hand, it is necessary create. the situation of the apocalypse is already in the passion of the europeans, who are beginning to wake up and there are french farmers. so you already why the macron refused? yes? this is obvious, because the voters do not approve of everything that is happening. now there, uh, and it seems to me that over time in italy, in france, yes, and in germany, too, a movement will begin against uh, russia standing. uh, occupied the status that uh definitely occupies in the western consciousness now. eh, the farther, the more this one the brussels group, uh, i call it the castaway group, because this is a certain number of european politicians and state affairs that go against the interests of europe, it will stand apart and in the future its actions will not only raise more questions. they will cause more and more rejection. and now it is necessary to work with this

information. here, look, when here is alekseevich an interesting idea. uh, yes, really, because, uh, no one really wants ukraine to win well , let's assume in such a fantastic scenario future. yes, there is a victory of ukraine from what and what ukraine does not have? what for nato needs is not very clear and so on. yes, on the contrary. yes, wait, then it ’s good, we’re looking at a different scenario opposite to russia, the question wins, oddly enough, the same, but what for nato needs if with all its might nato could not do anything with russia so why do we need it? as they say, yes, therefore, of course desire. you are right alekseevich thank you for this idea, of course, all desires for the longest possible continuation. it is in this status that the maximum for a long time they pray that this something lasts, it can not end, no one in the other direction, because it will be in both cases, defeat, by the way, such an amazing paradox, please. i wanted to add everything about what look how it's done. uh, this whole video, and in

the most classic soap opera canon so good, looking ideas girl tears in her eyes, and where are the most catholics? latin america so this is the message in the first place. i think, there and in general to all catholics, but on earth, after all after the pope of rome said that this whole russian operation was a response to the nato howl. i think that now a small response has come from the pope . he is, after all, he is the head of the jesuit order, and now he is, as it were, both yours and ours, then yes, here he played along first with russia and now he plays along with ukraine, of course, yes, so let's now have another one. uh, another one. so to speak, we will establish a direct communication channel. come here with us. this is hello. thank you for visiting us. hear us eduard alexandrovich excellent here. uh, this weekend they beat, again from hailstones in

donetsk, along yesenovata in gorlovka, makeevka, in the kuibyshev region. so we think the school in petrovsky was damaged, the store caught fire, the shell hit, they say in a kindergarten and the most terrible thing is that at that moment there were children there. here we want to tell you to comment on everything i mentioned. well, what we don’t know yet, i also asked. well, then i would like to add that, in addition to hailstorms, this hurricane tornadoes. uh, an attempt by the ukrainian side to use the point y in the depths of our republic, the air defense system works to shoot down this type of ammunition and missiles about the kindergarten. well, i don’t know, well, we don’t have children in kindergarten at school. it still started in february , if you remember, when there was a large-scale evacuation of the civilian population, then it was decided that all social facilities. especially with children. they do not work, so there are no children there, i understand, yes, a large number of us

hit kindergartens, schools, and hospitals. now, if we're talking numbers. the territory which is we talked about when there is no republic within the borders before the start of a special military operation. here are more than 4,000 objects, both social and private housing, that were completely or partially destroyed as a result of these attacks. if we are talking about children, the most painful thing is, probably, it is a shame that children suffer here for yesterday. we have a child again. 46 children were wounded at the beginning of the operation, 47 were already injured. four of them died. a total of 640 people were injured of varying severity and killed, 117. dead. here four of them children every day we have, uh, people die in shelling add. well, what to add at the moment there is shelling and

bluish hail. before that, the kuibyshevsky district of the city of nevsky artillery petrovsky leninsky kirovsky district is fired at by artillery fences, but this is our routine, we live in this every day alexander the last days. the intensity of shelling has somehow changed, or what it was like there that week, relatively speaking, it still is. no, she hasn't changed. she's holding on at the level of about 300 shells per day of various calibers and does not decrease. yes, think about what i am addressing the audience. this is 300 shells per day on average. well, this is such a life, such a word, such a background of life. oh, i hope that we will do everything so that this background, so to speak, disappears, finally forever from your life and from ours in this way. thank you very much eduard alexandrovich and even dosurin was in direct contact with us from donetsk , a very important such a sensitive topic, this is sweden and finland, which intend articles by members.

nato will submit an official application, they will be in the very near future. and moreover, helsinki and stockholm are clearly in a hurry. well, perhaps, they are actively driven very much. them. the so-called overseas partners are the curators of the parliament of finland, which will make a final decision today on wednesday. finland is going to send an application for nato membership to bruce already. well, that is, everything, as it were, is moving on its own , meanwhile, the head of nato, ian stoltenberg , showed up, and he declares that sweden will be. admitted to nato as soon as possible, he he promised to do everything to speed up this process as much as possible. well, uh, at the same time, it really seems that in finland, sweden is literally being driven into the north atlantic alliance. listen to what the president of finland says give back i don't think they planned any attack against finland then or now, but the situation has changed europe and the world are now more seriously divided there is almost no room

left for not joining. you see, here they are. i don’t think that they were planning any, and so against finland, i mean, of course, russia, yes, in the form, apparently, the question was like this. listen, why are you speaking? it is in this very nato that you are in real danger. he says, well, not that he threatens, but in general, i need it, i don’t have any charges left. in fact, alexei is in it now . it seems to me that this makes sense. true, and in a war, so to speak. i already talked about this, but let's do it again, i repeat, running between the trenches is the most ridiculous, the most stupid. what can you imagine ? unfortunately it has to. well, you have to choose either one or the other, so to speak, your business. your right. well, so to speak, wandering between them is not very not very successful, or this or this neutral status still made it possible not to wander between the trenches. well, don't join. to one of them here fits well with the maxim, if you are taken hostage, blink, it seems to me that the president says, yes, finland starts blinking. the fact is that the involvement of finland and sweden in nato does not have any such

military content. and if you don't take into account, just one little fact, the fact is that uh hmm these countries are of direct importance to the development of the northern sea route. these are arctic themes. now at this stage western countries. in fact , they are blocking and boycotting the arctic council, where the work of russia’s chairmanship has been suspended until the age of 23, but at the same time, there is an active preparation for nato countries to colonize the arctic in the future, pushing russia away from this . yes, it is strategic in nature, because it is should, according to the plan of the initiators of this entry into the alliance. uh, change to change the situation exactly in. yun because now russia has all the advantages. all of it dominates the region. it controls the northern sea route because the two goals are colonization, as i said, of the arctic with its natural resources, and control of the northern

sea route. here is the actual content. in my opinion, what is happening now with sweden finland and by the way, local experts are already talking about military occupation by the united states of these two countries, that is, and uh, it will be naturally, they say that we are against placing nuclear weapons on the territory of these countries of a military base, and so on. but who will remember this? after a while like yes of course. why do you enter the question arises, everything is exactly. so the evening ceases to be languid, in my opinion. that's interesting. so you think that he hinted , so to speak, if you were taken hostage. he tells us, so to speak, there, which means that we still need to see how he did it with his fingers. maybe he's a sailor three dots three dashes three dots - this is sos in general, right? here i need to look at it, but listen, but here it’s interesting, i don’t see mass protests against this finland, sweden, something like they say so, either they have reconciled already, or just understand the mood in society, there are massive there are no performances. only migrants

will be there, but the finns will have mass demonstrations. in general, forgive the finns. well, guys, this is a very good-natured nation, yes, which one. well, you heard that you had massive performances there, by the way, i've been there more than once in my life, and so on, just ethical peoples, yes, which, well, it's not customary for them, understand? nardic people uh, i have such a vision or even yes that finland and sweden did not just submit this application. look who is against erdogan and if there is some kind of very subtle nato western game here, and for a future deal, we are giving away blocking the entry. uh, finland sweden in nato there, well, in return receives a withdrawal corridor. here. khozovtsev from azov became and perhaps erdogan says these phrases, uh russia organizes a corridor for him, according to the withdrawal of the azov people. they never block, but he blocks for

russia, blocks, so to speak. yes, of course, it may not be. well, at least it's an unprecedented case where there hasn't been a single nato member, uh, opposing, uh, against joining. yes, this is understandable, the only question is very strange. why does erdogan need this not a blockage? blocking? clear. there are political so to speak, e official kurds. what was he up against? he, when tired, if we think that there will be some there some will become french in turkey it is important an interesting story. in fact, already in 2019, when polls were conducted among the population, how they relate to nato is only 21%. positively assess turkey's nato membership and in addition to erdogan and votes. now they are acting, but against joining. e sweden finnish, uh, finland in nato in senior leadership positions. there is also a turkish deep date, for example, the military, including a sensational

statement the other day by the ex-head of turkish military intelligence ismailov akvapekin, who said that in general nato is not just a threat to european interests, it’s not worth it, but now to accept sweden, finland into nato well, turkish and in fact, anti-nato anti -globalist sentiments in turkey are now very strongly intensifying and this is a very important trend. a very important trend to the extent that a conference is being held at the level of the istanbul university. is it necessary for turkey to withdraw from nato and how it will be , and in fact they remember the cases of de gaulle in the sixty-sixth year of the tenth year. and what as far as finland is concerned, it is very interesting that it is a country with a lot of books. and for example, i found a book, and the crown - this is a finnish journalist with the name 51. the reason why finland does not need to join nato well, or for example, what year? this is a book, and 2000 2000. but, for example, the same president. e, daria khalanin, for example, who served two terms in her post until 2012, generally said that during her lifetime it

would never happen in such a situation that her country would join nato, that is, for finland of course, but this moment of neutrality was sacred, it was preserved until the last moment, how fast everything is, how quickly the sacred moment of many years of negligence collapses. suddenly , like this, overnight, and even there are no streaks, as a rule. they are the nordic character, they somehow i unearthed, just here, in the graceful speech and debate, the president of the current finland found there a moment that she said that for sure only a in e, in the presence of a majority of the people only when a referendum was brought. he the fate of finland and nato will be decided. that's how i, it turns out, politicians like mine, in fact, of course, it's interesting. so we look, we naturally, we naturally look at well, we carefully look at with these declarations, for the time being, declarations still do it, although the matter is almost settled, but still, but still, well, i promise, yes, nevertheless, for now this declaration want completely unambiguous and clear. here are our diplomats. they say that we, so to speak, will

react to this . it means that russia will not accept the entry of finland, sweden into nato here. how do you understand it? this is not to accept not to accept, because we are now at the head of the arctic council. in any case, we made a clear statement about what the americans and i, by the way, formulated this word 2 years ago, like from a stove from this from this doctrine, because the united states of america exists, duck three is called arctic doctrine two years ago. it has been refined, according to this doctrine. well, anyone can open and see it is written that the northern sea route should be the property of all mankind. no look and therefore the intention is not clear. and here is ours and here is ours. but our intention is not very good. here it is yes, and that ours, that i. our intentions quite naturally contradict the strength of the fact that we will leave our territorial waters, for the northern sea route still dances from this, it is precisely there that our intentions to protect our avars. and in

principle, they naturally contradict the american and swedish-finnish ones, but i understand that what else is this counteraction the counteraction will be simple. we have iskanders on the territory of kaliningrad, you can put nuclear warheads there to ask. nobody prevents us from doing this. naturally, all countries, but these two will be dismantled for the purpose will be produced, or the assumption is a completely normal practice. and if , if you take, the potential that wonderful countries have, then i just remind you that finland is generally very short, but the call. i mean, they have conscripted armies, but she serves somewhere about a year at that time a little less, and in sweden the conscription was canceled 12 years ago. and that today sweden cannot even, according to the statement, not mine, but the northern countries, they periodically have such rallies to protect their own borders, therefore its military potential is all places. absolutely zero, so of course we're going to contradict. but what will change when it means that sweden and finland, uh, will finally join nato. yes, and what can we say in response, as the world changes, our uh

troops will change dramatically at this time. that's how he will change as he was for the former employer of the department of e, the heads of the us department of defense will change, of course, two more suckers. excuse me, for my veton they will pay to buy some up to two percent of gdp where the us secretary of defense worked at which enterprise, what does this enterprise represent? well, he is the minister of defense, in fact, you know this is such a pale corruption, beautifully packaged under the fears of europeans, and at the same time dispersed very classically very beautifully from the point of view of russia's security, the conversation, of course, but not interesting, because russia is safe in terms of security. if, as it were, from the point of view, an explanation is also missing in these words. what does this mean, here i am running this example. i talked to me, i said, guys, i explained it in an accessible way, it’s not available to us either. i believe it's it's for the people who think it's for the people who own something. i don’t know, there, in general, education at

the level is really there, but at least the average level. you look at the modern record of our brilliant audience, what kind of class is that? there seventh sixth. that's all they say, you see. let's plow up ecologically important earths to cope with hunger on the planet. this is the vice-chancellor speaking, germany is green, that is, they have a level of education. he is funny. that's what i'm missing. eh, i give an example all the time. here the swiss spoke. if switzerland and suddenly tomorrow it will be necessary to join them, it is written that in every house there must be a bunker of it, come and check in every bunk these doors are the same that you close in every house in the doorman. he must be legal. there must be a set of products by law and there must be two exits by law. they are waiting for a nuclear attack, and you explain to him that finland no longer showed a lot of money to switzerland. they prepared for everyone for us something that they understand for us what a nuclear strike is, when someone says, here dear colleague. and how many days does radiation dissipate in kaliningrad after a nuclear

strike, because there will be an american base. that's what you need to press, but i think it's worse, and what will happen if the americans also change in doctrine once bombed vietnam with chemical frosts. we said there would be no third world war. although the russians have their own pilot instructors there, they supply weapons to vietnam, the third pressing has begun. let's put bases everywhere. the third world war will begin, but we will reserve the right to use chemical weapons again. if we need it. but what if the doctrine is to change the whole of russia, if you scare, then really scare, they blur it out in such words that no one understands russia, and so the monster is necessary realize in the eyes of the western spiritual community something of themselves to make white fluffy. it is in the domestic market in the external market to be opened to talk, guys, the radiation is dissipated by nuclei. no one will survive the winter. you are crazy. you are now pouring oil on the fire, you are against all of humanity are you doing? sorry, firstly, finland told sweden that yes, that even after joining nato they would not allow it. well, at

least now they always are. look here. here's a declaration on a declaration these say, in no way case, we will not mean to deploy nuclear weapons. now it sounds like this, but russia wait, but russia, yes. according to you, it says so and according to your idea , and we will turn you, so this is the absolute most of all. consider that if you have a base it becomes a legitimate target, it's true, we always say it's not strokes, we play or billiards. no, it's not. listen, you still need to go. and tell me, please, that's all, this issue is resolved. here we will discuss, so to speak, from the fact that finland, sweden, is already entering into this all, i think yes, you can still something to answer. listen, once again, bye, bye, i understand, after all. well, let's carry. e! it is called in a formal way, such as while these are declarations, while it is still a declaration, this is a political decision that was announced, but not accepted, the rates were sent in june. they will enter. yes, yes, there are still

very important commercial arguments. i will do that if , even though a military expert, but does not rise to nuclear wars, so to speak, the destruction of all mankind with the glazing of the surface of finland sweden that, of course we are quite inwardly able to do the rights. if we want to do this , of course, we will not, but there are, uh, fishing colleagues. it is very simple to have a commercial agreement of 1838, under which we entered into a number of our fisheries and did not insist on our rights. well, in our northern borders there is still some kind of agreement on a joint late spritzbergen. we also show there, i would say , even increased flexibility of the spine, the last 30 years. basically, giving softness. we can just not show it absolutely, not rising to the cannons of tanks, planes, remaining in mirny, so to speak, in our society. they just waste such opportunities, for example. to catch fish, without which they live poorly, because i am to all those who are so very fond of talking about sweden in finland, the socialism that is built there is the last century. i will give only one figure in terms of the number of rapes of minors, now sweden is

in second place in the world than, as a rule, with fatal consequences. there is a terrible emigration nightmare, moreover, it is not integrated. i am now giving the data, just here the criminal ones from brussels specifically, that is, they have everything very unimportant in terms of food ; , a number of nuances, so to speak, but firstly, the declaration that they gave us, of course, told us all our lives all responsible politicians in finland are at least one and the same one and the same is one and the same it sounded like this is a sacred status, that all our decades or centuries of history there show that this is the only right way to solve and our neutrality, then bach without anything. i won't even say the word referendum. what should i mix, dear public? at some kind of muddy sociology look, look here, yes, and you can look no, well, as you know, the identity of the

fake cops of the police means no. no, no, no, here they have the same sociological surveys , too, 64%, no. so what am i talking about, uh, i read today in a telegram one e by an island, it means that they wrote there that in fact this accession of sweden and finland to nato resembles a fight in line for tickets on titanium. well, like, you know, about such a fight in line for tickets. no to me no i borrowed and so on. why because we return to what we have already discussed, and when the special military operation in ukraine is completed, it will suddenly become clear that nato turns out to be not such an ideal umbrella, as it especially presented itself and why do we need this nato should, in theory, think about what these are and what any other people are. i would like to answer alexei. there is another option, when such an option was already in 2008 , when they were going to accept, uh, georgia and ukraine a. that is, it was announced. yes, here they are , we accept them as candidates for nato, but without

a deadline. that's exactly the same option, maybe now the clarification of sweden, i don't rule it out, you know, but here i am, uh, me and alekseevich. somehow very often we need positions, it turns out we are. and i do not agree, because i remember very well when as soon as there was information that finland and , uh, sweden intends to join nato, and this was announced by ian stoltenberg immediately after we put forward our requirements for nato, literally 2 weeks later this information appeared, even then it became clear that this would soon be implemented . and now, judging by how fast it all happens now. well doubt how stoltenberg said that the guys will fail to join. and no, like half no. if you speak, then you will have nato bases and possibly. i think that, perhaps, there will be some kind of intermediate for which they hold them so tightly there, that he draws help with his fingers and, therefore, passes it on to the guys, but cannot refuse. why what, sweden

what germany if you look at everything where the rhetoricians have changed dramatically everywhere the social democrats are in power, the green ones are now completely under american control. as a political force, the green project is a suicide club. europe in the sense of my industrial economy dances with them. seem to be. this party was able to hold it very quickly through a government decision. they are, through popular discussion, exactly what the americans need. that is, this is a tool, and so on , the social democrat with green talk is over, in any direction. these enemies are simply europe of russia, enemies of the world, humanity in general. let 's digress. you know, here we are talking about kaliningrad , so that's what's interesting, but nato thinks that kaliningrad is hanging out with them? well, between the legs, yes, and we need to do something about this, listen. uh, what did kaliningrad, the former deputy minister of defense of poland, romuald sheremetyev, need

demilitarize, kaliningrad, because it can not be that nato is sitting on a powder keg inserted between its legs, this is clear to everyone. therefore, do not be surprised by my words. i actually quoted this wing. hanging out. it needs to be looked at, in general, everything looks clear. as if, well, i don’t know how, as an element, they singled out some kind of, like. see name. excuse me, and respect for e, so to speak, his position and gray hair, so to speak, but the novel by sheremetyev is, of course, a character in some kind of operetta noirmitiev. this is the first, repeating. and respect. so the second, see the second. in the wardrobe, the second thing he says is, actually uncle demilitarize, kaliningrad between the legs, powder keg, broads and so on, listen, well, that is, on the one hand, all this is ridiculous, but on the other hand, this is a clear and unambiguous provocation. quite tough in general, i understand such words that he is ex. uh,

you know, uh, ministers, everything else, well, it sounds pretty wild in general, especially from poland poland is such a hub, in general, of all attempts to check how russia reacts to certain things more than lithuania, and this is absolutely not funny, because to replace the word demilitarize with the word diversify. for example. uh-huh yes, yes, yes, there are already at the level of prime ministers about there to kill the russian world. so this is funny to me. that is why i paid attention to the fact that they began to sound intensively. and what can russia offer in the future to the invasion of the security architecture and, of course, kaliningrad for europe is this. well, get it right. so what's the flight time? yes sorry just. hidden, respectively, all these brainstorming conversations that take place in all brain factories, where in the underground, where not in the underground, where in the cabinet of ministers of defense, which are going to come down to one, what in the future?