move away calmly than we do. well, i called the fireman, they're on their way.

we urgently need to talk. let's

go in the yard. get in

. i have to get rid of the car. you mean get rid of what car? it's marina's car. you just say, can you help? than you probably know someone gypsy deals with cars, i 'll pay, but it is necessary that they drive it anywhere for dismantling abroad. i do not care. the main thing is that it disappears forever. and they are officer

oleg, i have no one else to turn to. misha hello. hello nor, why are you so late? i am already leaving. and you why are you sitting here? go to the house of your question. decide here is our go to sleep tell. here

hello yes okay eric

well, where's your racer? don't worry, so what's wrong? well, agreed without question?

mish we each other all our lives. i've never seen you like this. never before. i had to make sure everything will be fine. rides.

the major is here.

let's go to you here now to get a taxi. thank you, ok.

hello misha how are you? find out how i'm doing. i want to know if everything is ok. exactly, why all these questions? do you want it right? called to

police cars were stolen. they called you, why are you interested? why are you leading me by the nose? my daughter's car is registered to me. worry. well , as soon as i discovered it, i immediately declared it. familiar, although in order, the chances of finding a car are small. already found somewhere near the border, so everything worked out.

good evening on the air, the big game today in moscow hosted the anniversary summit of the collective security treaty organization, let me remind you that this organization includes russia belarus armenia kazakhstan kyrgyzstan and tajikistan self-organization 20 years, and the tashkent collective security treaty, on the basis of which the csto was established, is 30 years old, and of course, against the background of the current state of global and regional security, the preservation and further strengthening of this organization is of great importance. indeed, at the global level, we are witnessing a hybrid war of the united states against russia and the growing confrontation against china at the regional level, this situation in afghanistan and the whole complex connected. uh, related threats. yes, and internally a number of countries, uh, the csto are facing threats

of instability, and that's it. this is actually interconnected, and in this regard, the strengthening of the csto. dima it is very difficult for russia and its allies to survive alone in the new world. especially for small countries and during the summit, vladimir putin today made a number of very important statements, including on the current topic of nato expansion, let's listen to the president. with regard to the expansion of the north atlantic alliance. yes, this is a problem that is being created. in my the view is completely artificial, since this is done in the interests of the foreign and foreign political interests of the united states in general, it should be used as an instrument of foreign policy, in fact one country. well, it is done quite persistently skillfully and very aggressively, this aggravates everything that is already difficult. eh, the international security situation, with regard to

expansion, including through the new members of the finnish alliance, sweden in russia would like to inform you dear colleagues. no problem with these states do not, and therefore, in this sense , uh, there is no direct threat for us to expand at the expense of these countries for russia, but the expansion of military infrastructure into this territory will certainly cause our response . and what it will be we will look at, based on the threats that will be created for us, that is, in general, the problem is created from scratch. well, we will respond accordingly. well, and so the president said that russia would not react to the very fact of nato expansion, but to the expansion of the military alliance infrastructure to finland sweden. if this happens and in general, if nato expands into these countries, but here's what a puzzles me, to be honest, i want to

ask igor yuryevich about this, look incomprehensibly. ah. will there be another expansion of nato to finland, sweden or not, but at the same time, the alliance is already declaring that it will increase its military presence in the baltic sea region, since this is allegedly necessary to ensure security in finland, sweden before they join nato about this jens stoltenberg stoltenberg said yesterday. knata at the ministerial meeting uh in berlin and nato uh, while finland sweden after all, no one threatens. and by the way, speaking sauli ninistoe, but the minister. uh, the president i apologize in finland yesterday following the results of his conversation with vladimir putin by phone, but he said he confirmed that it was true. uh, finland does not feel a military threat, some strange paradox appears from russia. nobody threatens finland. this is recognized by finland itself at the highest level, but

nato talks about the need to build up a military presence in the baltic sea region to protect this finland, which no one threatens. you can comment on this situation. unfortunately , the position of turkey, which it is now popping up , speaks about the fact that supposedly we will now talk about blocking the entry a little. in finland and sweden in an alliance. i think that after all this problem will be solved and helsinki and stockholm will become full-fledged members of the northern alliance in the summer under an accelerated procedure, which regarding the question you asked, but we see how, without a break from the existing reality, the all automatic alliance creates the image of an enemy from russia if necessary. indeed , with these provocative statements, which will then be converted into practically steps that will

increase military activity, it has already been announced that there are supposedly, well, not an expectation, but fears that russia may now try by some military means within this period of several months. uh, some kind of aggressive actions take against. uh, respectively, finland sweden we remember that boris johnson played the first fiddle here, who made a visit to these two neutral so far that scandinavian countries and stated that in fact the uk provides its nuclear security umbrella in case the kremlin somehow now, allegedly will try by military means to stop the entry of these countries into the alliance in development, we see a message about more and more transfers of american military contingents, which will be deployed on the territory of the baltic countries, again as part of some preparatory measures in order to

contain russia. but against this background, we see frankly provocative. which officials do, for example, in riga, declaring that the baltic sea is already an inland sea. nato will have to be in charge here, but stoltenberg's statement fits perfectly into this, in fact, outline. i don't know whether or not in finland sweden will somehow be able to avoid placing nato infrastructure on its territory. mm. uh, there is a nuclear planning group. firstly, the representatives of finland and sweden should also be involved. although they say that they will not allow the deployment of nuclear weapons on their territory, they will nevertheless participate, including in choosing a target for possible nuclear strikes on russia, i want to say that the same here, well, for example, sweden has a network of first-class military airfields and first-class

naval bases on its territory. of course, the alliance will use these bases both in reinforcement operations and in we can’t rule out the possibility that with the aggravation of the military-political situation in the european theater of operations, on the territory of these countries, at the same time, some strike elements of high-precision weapons, including missiles, may be deployed. and it works here. this is the formula for flight time, in particular, to our northern capital, of course, although president putin has done enough of this. i would say a calm uh statement, but the dots are all set now , we don’t see a threat from finland and sweden, but any an attempt to expand the military infrastructure will cause an immediate military-technical response from russia well , it’s exactly the situation that, against the will of even sweden and finland, they want to deploy nato infrastructure, they don’t want to deploy nato infrastructure nato is already

going to build up its military presence in the baltic region. everyone will be forced to respond to this, that is, this emphasizes the thesis that the initiative here does not come from finland and sweden, but from completely different countries. they just become pawns in the global geopolitical game of the united states and this move will hardly be made by e4, not by stockholm , not by helsinki, but by washington , perhaps by the hands of the brussels bureaucracy. here is vladimir putin, just in the speech that we heard, and he said that the expansion of nato is in the interests of the united states, and this is absolutely. true we know perfectly well that the so -called nato open door policy is a myth, yes, the assertion that any country supposedly can join nato that wants to join nato is a lie because all decisions to expand or not to expand nato are made by the united states in the interests of the united

states and e.g. the history of finland and sweden is a clear confirmation of this. here are two examples. the first example, and this is the visit to helsinki by mitch macon, the top republican currently in the senate. e heads of the republican minority. in the senate, a very influential american politician. he is already in helsinki, despite the fact that in finland he has not even submitted an application yet, he has not even submitted an application for membership in nato sword makonul is already in helsinki saying that the united states will ensure the ratification and the agreement on finland's accession to nato by the end of august, that is, indeed, during this summer. and another illustration is the dispute that arose between the collective west and turkey, you correctly mentioned that turkey decided. well, apparently it’s more expensive to bargain to sell, yes, but on the expansion of nato, today it has announced

that it is going to block it in the current one. and in the current context uh, joining finland, sweden and in nato today , the president of e, recepta and erdogan spoke very brightly about this, listen there is a message that they will not extradite terrorists to us. we will not say yes to the entry of these two countries into nato, even in their parliaments there are supporters of terrorism. will they come and persuade us? don't bother nato will turn into a concentration of terrorists if turkey approves joining the alliance in finland and sweden. well, what kind of terrorists is erdogan referring to? which helsinki and stockholm really supported for a long time. and from the point of view of official ankara, these are terrorists. and it is obvious that erdogan demands from finland, sweden, not only

a change in its policy, but also some more serious steps. maybe even an apology to turkey for the policy that it pursued. but what's interesting is that other countries immediately attacked turkey. and by the way, uh, turkey in the words of the minister of foreign affairs, what a couple of days ago? she stated that she most likely did not will support, again in the current circumstances, the entry of sweden into nato in finland, so yesterday, and the leader of the leading party of the european parliament of the european people's party, manfred weber, said that if turkey blocks sweden's entry into nato in finland, then isolation will await it, that is, pay attention. yes, that's who the question is, yes, and who threatens turkey turkey is not threatening stockholm helsinki yes, but turkey is threatened by the very representatives of the euro-atlantic elites in this regard. i have a question for ivan alekseevich. what for the united states? and why do these same

euro-atlantic elites need the euro? why micha makonulo? why fight johnson? yes, why would manfried weber join sweden in finland if, let me say a few words to begin with, i will say about turkey, first of all, a very remarkable statement by the europeans. uh, politicians that they isolate uh nato apparently inside. or rather, it isolates turkey, but, apparently, within nato, that is, some kind of quarantine will be created there for the guilty, where turkey will be placed, in general it would be logical to say that if such a passage is a bad member and behaves so badly, we will exclude it. well , it would be a camp, what is a country a full member of the alliance, we isolate it. this is such a doctrine of limited sovereignty within the alliance . no, to be honest, i have no idea at all how it is possible to isolate a country in an organization where, like,

all decisions are made by content people. it is turkey that can veto its own army, the most combat-ready after the us in uh. i'm actually talking about this. if indeed, they are something wanted to do, but it would have been necessary to threaten exclusion from nato that, if you are like that, it means that you are bad members of the organization, we take these, and we expel you , but it is clear that this is impossible in the current circumstances. and now they throw some words that mean nothing in practice, but there can be no isolation of turkey, and i would also say that at least they said that turkey is bargaining. it's a matter of selling more. and this element is definitely present. but i think there is another element in turkish politics. it ruin their blood. i, yes, i think that sooner or later, turkey will agree, rather agree. although

i cannot exclude the possibility that european politicians are now saying something like the president. uh, recep tayyip erdogan is for a principled position and will take a principled position, or at least stretch it out for half a year. but even if they now the parliament will ratify, then the 30th parliament will ratify and so on. and, of course, he will be threatened inside with turkish elections, which are also suitable there, and so on. but and even if a compromise is found, i think turkey is still an element. not only to sell your position at a higher price, but and still, you know, here we are not puppets, just like puppets are all the rest, so drink. here it is important for them to have blood and show integrity, bring it to the end, or not bring this question open, but show integrity. i think that this element of turkish

policy is now directly your question. why are they stuffed into nato? i think that initially, the idea of ​​​​their, uh, stuffing into nato, you know, is so conditionally vegetarian. and i think that this is a political message, originally a political message. what kind of russia is saying that it is disrupting ukraine's entry into nato, that it will not allow it, that this is a red line, so, look, we are expanding it anyway. they can't do anything about it . here are two sides, that is, a demonstrative wrist violation of russian red lines, underlined. i think that this is arrogance. uh, such a political task - it is present, but i think it is precisely because, in principle, er, this is a political task of the elite in sweden and finland agreed so easily. although i emphasize them people, they decided not to ask.