the face bored me. enough tea. i'm still going to celebrate the first day today. let's just skip these. here i am in the car. i will gladly call you a taxi. i'll call you a taxi. but you don't have to go home today. don't worry, you'll be fine, i'm always there.

good evening on the air is a big game and one of the most important events of today. this, of course, is the beginning of the handing over of servicemen of the armed forces of ukraine and militants of the azov battalion to russia from the territory of the azovstal plant in mariupol. the mariupol epic, which kiev and its patrons in the west portrayed as an example, supposedly fortitude and heroism, apparently ends and ends ingloriously, because they surrender, but nevertheless,

the collective west, led by the united states , in its hybrid war. against russia continue to try. to prolong the military conflict, more and more weapons are being provided to ukraine, as well as intelligence information about the location and movement of russian troops, and only today, for example, the us senate, by a majority vote, decided to put the law on providing military assistance to ukraine on nearly $40 billion to vote. the weight of the preliminary discussion, that is, questions about where american weapons will end up in the future, how the provision of such assistance is aligned with the long-term goals of american policy, and what consequences this may lead to. what could be the response of russia to the majority of senators, apparently these questions are not interested in how such a policy is perceived in russia today, both the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs , sergei lavrov, and the presidential press secretary said

russian dmitry peskov and secretary of the russian security council nikolai patrushev let's listen to the minister of foreign affairs. ukraine is not needed by anyone ukraine is a consumable in a hybrid total war against the russian federation, now this no longer raises any doubts. it's announced publicly the eu's top diplomat says that in this war victory must be won on the battlefield and british americans presidents prime ministers say we have no right to let russia win russia must be defeated there is a war and a name has been declared, and by no means between ukraine and russia between the west and russia ukraine, as you know, has already become such a common expression for preparing to fight to the last ukrainian very, very rarely. and here are the words

of kremlin spokesman dmitry peskov hybrid war what is happening now what we are facing now, you can’t talk about information wars without linking everything to the general context of a hybrid war. it's not just american british military advisers who tell ukrainian nationalists with guns what do? which give them intelligence information and so on. no, this is a diplomatic war. this is also a political war. this is an attempt to isolate us in the world. this is an economic war. yes, we still softly call them unfriendly states. and i would say that this is already a hostile state, because what they are doing is war. well,

completing this triad, uh, secretary of the russian security council nikolai patrushev today stated a quote that ukraine has become a pretext for waging an undeclared war against russia, and we will discuss this american politics, which today three high-ranking representatives of russia in one day called a hybrid war, and with the president of the center of national interests in washington and the co-host of the big game. eh, dmitry sainz good afternoon, let's go people and my first question to you, of course, is about, uh, surrender , and units of the apu and us of the azov battalion from the russian point of view. this is a very important milestone of the special operation, which allows us to sum up some results, at least intermediate results in the following way. this is how washington perceives the beginning of the surrender of the defenders of azov and steel. in principle,

washington is considering the progress of the russian special operation. how do you guess? uh, there is a complete mismatch of perspectives, uh, moscow and washington, and uh. in america, uh, formally there are no federal channels, that is, formal no one, uh, mass media. eh, no directions. but if you look at, in general, at the entire corporate mussel, then, it seems that there is, uh, very large. eh, monotony is monotony. in this particular case, it boils down to first of all, it emphasizes not who knew that, but how long it took russia to work on this, and at the same time, it is naturally said that this shows the stubbornness of ukrainian resistance by the

motivation of ukrainian military personnel. well , the fact that they surrendered is less successful, like the victory of russia, but as a manifestation of the humanism of president zelensky, who, uh, took care of his people, uh, and didn’t want to, uh, risk sacrificing in vain. uh, their lives, dmitry is a professional clarification, that is , it turns out that what russia, in principle, could destroy them all with one blow and instead russia first allowed the withdrawal of civilians , then russia evacuated the wounded and renders the wounded. and the defender of azovsky , who really sat there for such a long time , medical assistance, and there are more than 60 of them, but to whom, but provided, but medical assistance. that is , it is not taken into account by the american media at all. well, you know dmitry, don't interrupt me.

if it hadn't been interrupted, i would have told it all myself. e you know when you say it is not accepted at all. uh, in general, of course, this is not completely true, because there is, for example, tucker carlson, the most popular american television commentator, who speaks on the fox channel in front of an audience of millions, and he talks about all this, uh, and uh, of course , they are accused of speaking at the suggestion of moscow, maybe even putin personally, but i think all reasonable people understand that he is voicing his own and very informed point of view. but in general i tried to tell you something like uh the media, but serving this uh hybrid war in ukraine which, uh, first of all, it's very different in the russian american case

and second, that in the american case there's more uh, paradoxically the sameness than in the case of russia because the american media , they are constantly proud of their independence. um, well, it's basically independence. i don't know what it manifests itself in, maybe people have it. uh, infatuation with their group point of view, that they repeat everything the same and the same, well, in general, to hear a different perspective, and it is very, very difficult, but let's get back to your main question, if you don't mind about uh, what is the collective west hoping for, and what is hoped for, i don't think that this has changed fundamentally as a result of the russian victory and allowance i think more central is the feeling that here they have just taken

in an american compress. at least in the senate. such huge allocations for ukraine demonstrated the will to spend as many as it takes 40 odd, uh western, uh, arming uh ukraine and have already gone so far as to represent not just modern heavy offensive weapons, but dmitry they take weapons from their own arsenals. this is especially true here, for example, countries such as germany, they already say that some very important types of weapons. they just don't have any left. they will need to replenish their own armed forces. and uh, of course, this is done in order to demonstrate that russia is not can win in ukraine that, so that russia

does not quit. e in this operation in these hostilities, that the west will be able to respond to this and will do it more and will do it. this is a more modern weapon. on the one hand, this is also betted on. this is what it looks like. eh, very, convincingly, because well, if you take into account, and the difference in, uh, the economic opportunities of the collective west and russia, then the possibilities, of course, are different about this as well. uh, the russian leaders themselves. they spoke, including, of course, president putin but on the other hand. what at this does not take into account, and does not take into account the most basic thing, that when in russia they talk about a special operation, and not about a war. i think this is not just rhetoric. i think that this means a certain nature of the introduction of combat.

in the ukrainian case, they talk about mobilizing up to a million people in the russian case. there is no talk of anything like that. there is no mobilization at all, there are no plans to mobilize the economy, and these are all possibilities. naturally. remain in russia was a very good article recently in the new york times about what russia has not done, and it just says that at the time, how beautifully it accuses. but if you want, almost in war crimes. in fact, russia conducted the fighting in such a way that it was obvious that, at least at the highest level, there was an indication. to avoid damage to the civilian population to the people of ukraine, which is in the plans of russian military operations. there is no such attack on large cities, uh, as in the case of the nato operation, remember your time in the ninety-

ninth year against yugoslavia against belgrade, then what was done, and in 2003, against iraq, against attacks on baghdad, which were subjected to very tough, very massive bombardments. and although it was formally said that the destruction of the leaders, and the melokhivichi and saddam hussein, was not nato's task, but strikes were made on dark places where they made decisions, where their government met and in their personal palaces, and nothing like that in the case of the russian operation in ukraine no well. they say that the lack of grain is due, among other things, to someone on the coast of ukraine in the region the black sea of ​​odessa that it is carefully mined, more precisely, not russia, but it is mined, it is

mined by ukraine itself. there were no cyberattacks that were expected from russia and no attempts to tie, say, trans-atlantic cables. a lot of things russia could do and reasonable people can argue guess. why russia showed such restraint, among other things, is possible because russia understood that such measures could cause countermeasures and russia wanted to provide for its citizens with us. a normal life, but it is very important to understand that the arsenal of russian opportunities is far from being exhausted. and most importantly, dmitry, i am impressed by the, uh, unity of the collective west , which biden and the administrator

, managed to organize his administration, but i am even more impressed, that is, by the unity of the russian people, which everyone sees and notes, including american commentators that no principles of serious internal political crisis. even the beginning of such a crisis, even the beginning of some kind of mass in the discontent of the people is not. and when the russian people are united and they have an arsenal and a response to the actions of the collective west, then, it seems to me, it would be very frivolous, it would be extremely dangerous, but proceed from the fact that the escalation of hostilities. against russia that this is the way to get results dmitry, i completely agree with your analysis and this analysis leads me to the question of whether the biden administration itself can in the long term in the long term or even in the medium term to continue the course that it is now following,

look, when they talk about what’s wrong with a blue eye, when they say that ukraine supposedly can win the war, they forget that you are absolutely right they said russia lives a generally normal life, and in ukraine, about 30% of the population left their homes, a third of the infrastructure has been destroyed, and according to western experts, the economy will shrink by the end of this year. twice russia has nothing of the kind, and in sight. yes, this is the first. secondly, we have already talked about the fact that the policy of the west towards russia to weaken russia from russia would be theoretically successful if this policy was supported by countries outside the collective west, this is also not the case, and we hear more and more critical votes for the united states and just today, and even uh,

argentine vice president cristina kirchner once again accused the united states of double standards that they support only invasions and not support other invasions. and most importantly, you dmitry said that you were impressed by the ability of the united states to mobilize to unite the collective west; the question is how long and whether this consolidation will continue. kola for a long time, because already now even western experts are writing about internal splits . inside the collective west about it. here is literally yesterday wrote, influence. journal of politics a and particularly that while the united states of poland and great britain continue, at least rhetorically , the course of defeating russia by the largest countries of the european union. uh, germany, france and italy oppose this, and we

really heard the speech of the macron, uh, in the european parliament, in which he said that it is very dangerous to humiliate russia extremely. dangerous for europe's long-term stability prospects and so on. yes, and in this regard, the real question is, can the biden administration and the united states support this consolidation and can they generally pursue that policy, ah, which they announced, i have serious doubts about it dmitry well, good questions. it seems to me that you and i do not particularly differ in opinion here, let's start with the collective west now in the collective west. uh, unprecedented, of course, this is the only absolute enough to look at the position of, say, hungary, which refuses to impose additional energy sanctions , it is enough to mention that austria has very clearly

stated that it is not yours and will not go in the way of sweden in finland and will not will join nato but nonetheless. here are a few collective ones. the west is listen dmitry a. why not, because after all, uh, the fighting takes place on the territory of ukraine and not strangely nato and the european union, but sanctions, uh, dile has sanctions. it is clear that the european union, together with the united states, has more economic leverage. uh, than russia and of course, while they are kind of fighting on the territory of their beloved ukraine, i said to my beloved, partly in quotation marks, because if they are ready , will ukraine go through what it is going through. this suggests that love for ukraine these people have limits and we are talking about economic sanctions against russia why don't you show unity? it does not directly affect them. but if russia would start

to strike at some bases on some means of communication, for some reason it would be different outside the territory of ukraine. i think that the unity from the collective west would not last 24 hours and many others would be found here dissenting opinions, because it is one thing to be united when it costs nothing to you, when others are punished, and another it is a matter of subjecting oneself to one's own countries to a serious test. and victim a. as for america itself. well, you know again, when you strike and uh? in general, american economic strikes against russia are not hidden in any way, that the strikes were carried out as much as possible so that it would not hurt america, if something could be difficult for the american economy, then they didn’t do it, but the question is that there are, uh, immediate

consequences of your actions, and these immediate consequences are avoided by us sanctions. is there. uh, just those unpredictable unforeseen consequences that are associated with a general blow to the global economy. and now we are already seeing this, but on the example of food, which, in general, is becoming a serious problem in many countries, partly due to the war in ukraine and not as a result of any conscious actions on the part of russia, but. kisel always said that he was a statesman, unlike a politician. that he thinks not only about what the situation will be after your move. and what the situation will be after you have been answered this move, and we will not delve into it so that they ask an absolutely correct question. but how long it will last, and

the readiness of the population of the united states , support this war if the consequences for the american voters themselves become clear. yesterday elon musk is one of the most effective and far-sighted american businessmen. he was very critical of the bypasses and said that what he is doing as a result of his domestic foreign policy in the matter of increasing inflation, that this will lead to the united states to very serious damage even to the catastrophe and that by the end of the year. inflation in the united states, uh, maybe reach the scale of venezuela, i want to remind you that inflation there is absolutely catastrophic and undermines the basis of normal life. well, i was trying to imagine how the american voters would react. and if that's

on the eve of the midterm elections elections to the congress of governors. uh, in november of this year. now, if there is such a level of inflation, by the way, the american market is very different from the russian one. seriously went down. well, i don't know what the reaction will be. i can only tell you that my neighbor stopped me. and we live in the countryside. and there, as it were, there are many neighbors. sorry not much and we live at a distance. i was specifically stopped when i was driving, uh, and asked. this is what is happening now, and he is talking about ukraine, here. what does putin want there and i tried to express my opinion on this matter in a nutshell, and he says, and that putin is really destroying our economy? i told him that i didn't i can say that putin is deliberately destroying the american economy. at least, i am not

aware of such russian years. but that, of course, this conflict does not contribute to world trade and stability, including the american economy and the neighbor dragged. why then is biden doing this, what did putin do to us so that we would go into conflict with him, if this is a blow to our economy, and he says, now you can’t buy baby food in our stores, and i’m reading that this it goes to ukraine and in america here we say, it's getting harder harder to buy. i didn't see uh, uh, there was an outreach in america that would show people why ukraine should be their central national interest, and you rightly mentioned dmitry that this uh bill for 40 billion ukraine without any

supervision without that, as senator paul insisted, uh, the inspector general of the department of defense somehow keep track of these expenses. what here, let 's do it, it's like this, just give ukraine well, excuse me. these are not serious. i remember back in the day, while the debate in the us congress over us involvement in the first gulf war, when saddam hussein took over smoking and then the senate foreign relations committee. there were serious and critical hearings on this with different opinions dmitry i know, you are well, uh, aware of american history, who is the chairman of the senate commission, taking advantage in people's affairs when there was a serious debate, what should the united states do? of course, but here

now, under president joe biden, the senate, in general, a has not bothered to hold any of this kind of discussion. do you know why this is dangerous for america itself, for the administration itself, because without such discussions without preparing the population, it turns out to be very easy to get into a big war, because the people do not understand the gravity of this situation. but when this situation becomes seriously clear, what happens is what happened with vietnam, what happened with afghanistan and the administration. can supply herself involuntarily in a very vulnerable position, and she will have the choice of uh, either uh, make big concessions on ukraine that she is extremely unwilling to show or really get a serious internal political crisis in america. dimitri, i completely agree. with your analysis and in terms

of sanctions in terms of the risks and consequences of the possible consequences of the current policy of the biden administration, even if one agrees with the topic, it seems to me that it is true that the anti-russian sanctions are not the original the reason for the inflation that we are seeing in the united states, the sanctions are certainly the most powerful catalyst, and without these sanctions , inflation in the united states would not be what it is now and which it may become by the end of the year, as it was rightly said, and now the rating of the administration biden record low. we all thought that according to the opinion polls, trump was perceived as the worst president, he was perceived as the worst president in the history of the united states . there is no such thing today without any doubt is on all matters of public opinion. the current president, and joe biden, and i completely agree with you. regarding the danger of unintentional or even premeditated danger. escalation, but

most likely not deliberate, because duck uh . actually, rand paul also spoke about this. and what will happen to these american weapons that will now be sent to ukraine and what consequences will this lead to, how does this fit with the goals of the policy of the united states how realistic are the goals of this american policy. and so i would like to return. actually , to what i started today, when on the same day three high-ranking representatives of russia say that they perceive the current situation as a hybrid war or an undeclared war or a hybrid war, but unanimously. it seems to me that this is a very important signal, this is a very important signal, and i must say that one of the distinguishing features of russian foreign policy, in my opinion, is is that when russia says it's red lines, russia really is. that is how it is meant

and the crossing of russian red lines backfires . unfortunately, we are seeing this. ah, that the united states continues to ignore russian red lines. i will give it very briefly. just two examples the first is support, of course. and even i would say delaying entry into finland and sweden. and in nato, russia unequivocally said that it was unacceptable for her to bring nato close to the borders russia is all the more, uh, such a long border as the russian finnish one, however, the united states is very actively supporting this process and this week president biden will receive leaders in finland sweden uh, in the white house moreover, the united states emphasizes that and the doors of nato are open, it turns out, even for ukraine, the chargé d'affaires declared this yesterday. uh, the united states uh. there are three people in kiev today, i emphasize once again the high-ranking. the person representative of russia emphasized that and here

the current actions of the united states and the provision of intelligence a and the supply of weapons is a red line, because this is perceived as a hybrid war, and a hybrid war, as you and i know very well, dmitry may one day stop being a hybrid right? and i would not like to allow this, and i would very much like to see such russian signals. and today a very serious signal was sent and heard not only in the american expert community. i know perfectly well that in the expert community these signals they hear and you dmitry are a clear confirmation of this, but also in the administration of joe biden. dmitry thank you very much for this conversation. we will definitely continue with you next time, and the big game program will be back in a few moments. it would be right to penetrate into

the affairs of germany through the far east, where it is quite possible to obtain information about the plans of our enemies. i am ready for sorge on sunday at first. i don’t know in the history of our intelligence that our president was a personal friend of the ambassador of the country with which we was to fight. everyone in the family communicates in their own way. you don't want to write, you say you don't want to talk. write a tariff for the family. set up minutes and the internet so that everyone has enough beeline on your side.

i will have time to get a tinkoff black card before june 30 and get free service forever tinkoff he is such a one-of-a-kind decoration sokolov watch at manufacturer prices, we are increasing discounts up to 70% right now. sounds profitable m.video it doesn't matter how exchange rates change. we always bet on people. for us, the state is not

millions, and confidence dignity pride in this is our strength the strength of our country fsb believe people. create nastya already in the park i'll take it from the club. he is your party-goer, he is my e-sportsman. there is no longer a park. we are now the castle of this three films back spoke princess. nastya already the entire internet wanted you soon.

and for mts subscribers also 50 gb of internet back. it is important for a large technological bank to stay face to face with a person in three minutes in two clicks on one call in order to justify your trust to support you by actually issuing loans sovcombank is closer to people every day. make purchases in magnet stores. send checks to the chatbot. i'll help, win items from the barbecue collection and 100.000 bonuses for all grilling occasions.

gifts in magnet all these cats business has adapted. and we helped to accept payments and not lose clients, keep accounts and not make annoying mistakes. quickly move your business online our business products will help you adapt tinkoff is the only bank of the year in russia for any circumstances. big on the air game and as we discussed today with dmitry simes one of the main events of today is, of course, the beginning of the surrender, and the azov battalion militants at the

azovstal plant in mariupol this is a very important milestone. and the mariupol epic, which the collective west tried to present as a model of alleged heroism, ends and ends without any heroism, because the defenders of azov became, if you can call them that, surrender, and heroism shows russia not only heroism, humanism, but because they receive medical care, and in principle, they are treated like human beings. and yet quite recently. well, at the beginning of the special operation , the leaders of the azov said that they were going to fight to the drop of blood. listen, on february 26, february 26, 10:00 am, the city of mariupol regiment, azov, together with the armed forces of ukraine, the national guard and other law enforcement agencies, are reliably guarding mariupol, we will fight to the last drop of blood. we are not afraid of neither

enemy tanks, nor missile strikes, nor enemy aviation. i order every fighter of the azov regiment to fight to the last, we will destroy the russians in the air, on land and on the water together to victory glory to ukraine well, it somehow didn’t work out very well. yes, and even today, before the start of the surrender, they stopped at azov, and the deputy head of the battalion. azov, he said that there would be no mariupol, there would be no ukraine rivers anatolyevich well, mariupol for ukraine no longer exists and does not exist forever. what does this mean? well, this was, of course, a symbolic statement that mariupol is a symbol of such fortitude well, actually, they showed. what is this resilience and you can understand that the same thing will happen, of course, from the territory of ukraine, that is, the words in a sense, prophetic , the same thing will happen to all of ukraine, and now

the economy of ukraine is undermined. it doesn't actually exist. well, at least 50% of gdp from it. uh, she will lose recovery, this is not subject, because in order for something to be restored , some growth drivers must be. naturally they are absent. uh, agriculture that can somehow theoretically it was considered some kind of growth driver, it will not exist if less than 20% of the sown crops are planted. when now the europeans are cynically declaring that it is urgent to withdraw all the grain from ukraine in order to free the health facility for the future harvest, you need to understand that there is no future. there is no harvest, taxes, no one pays, the infrastructure is destroyed, that is, a gigantic humanitarian catastrophe. and if the europeans manage to help ukraine, as they say, they help to pull out all this grain from ukraine, then there will be a famine another plus to all this, and therefore, to say

that in these conditions there will be some kind of resilience, something else, of course, does not come, ukrainians. everyone will repeat the fate of the spiritual fate of the evolution of hope. savchenko, she was also brave. heroine, brave, pilot. eh, girl, especially girls, so to speak, is not typical. there's some extreme courage there. moreover, so to speak, she went to war very courageously, there, and so on , she fought a little, but it was not the prison that broke her, she, like you, remember, she went on hunger strikes there us and so on, her spirit was strong, but she looked a little wider. she is simple. she got out of the power of ukrainian propaganda. i just didn’t watch for some time, their television did not participate in their networks. if she just thought about what and why are we actually fighting, and who are you actually fighting, but the russians, they are the same people, they speak the same language, which we have never been threatened at all, by and large, but nato, which is with

us now takes out the grain that arms us, but at the same time, for some reason, she didn’t make us out of us, a thriving economy. although the same $40 billion that biden has now requested. and yes, ukraine has 10 or 20 billion of them. no, no, when you gave it all to him there 20 years ago. well, this would be a giant gift for ukraine. she would then brag and show ukraine in russia would speak. look how great it is to be nato to be the usa we live richer than you russians. they didn't, they subdue the weapon so they die. this is the concept that every ukrainian should have. i think that these azov people will understand all this very quickly. and in fact, the rest of the so-called ukraine , which will not want to join these ukraine soon, and they themselves will refuse people, and they gave this nickname, which

was once the polish lord polish plans, that you are ukrainians of the outskirts yes, of our state of the polish commonwealth, here they are from this nickname will have to be abandoned. they will be ashamed of this nickname, and igor yuryevich and what do you think, uh, surrender. uh, vsushnikov and azov will affect the course of the russian special operation. let's call a spade a spade. it's not surrender it's surrender. we see that from these brave physiognomies in quotation marks, who declared their fortitude of loyalty to the oath of readiness to defend ukraine to the last drop of blood from all this bragging. nothing else is left, who do we see today, who surrenders to us as a prisoner? this is rabble. for which the main principle is to survive to survive at any

cost and this is important to understand, these are not just some hard assessments, this is an invoice. realizing the futility of further resistance not wanting to die what zelensky would really like, they just surrender to elementary to survive to give yourself a chance at some. a different fate, but most importantly, the motivational motive survive at any cost, so today it capitulates to me in the same way as the paulus army near stalingrad capitulated at one time. the denazification operation of the demilitarization of ukraine is important, because this hornet's nest

will now be cleaned up without any problems. today surrendered a large group, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, we will see a new and new hundreds and thousands. ukrainian military personnel and the nationalist rabble, which will surrender with a submissive look. letting themselves be searched to go through the screening procedure and then they want to live. in this regard, of course, russia has shown humanism, but you know we should not be humane in absolutely all areas. still, these are prisoners of war , the norms that exist within the framework of the geneva conventions will be applied to them, but at the same time i am absolutely convinced of this that the investigation of war criminals has been carried out and is consistent.

ukrainian nationalists who are guilty of murders, rapes, massacres of civilians in robberies, destruction of civilian infrastructure must suffer appropriate criminal liability and, after being recognized as such in the framework of the relevant legal and judicial procedures, they must serve their term through forced labor. on the restoration of donbass in the same way as german prisoners of war after the end of the great patriotic war they restored with their work what they destroyed on the territory of the soviet union, i am absolutely convinced that this category of ukrainian prisoners of war should not fall into any exchange procedures right now, because even if we exchange 5-10 people. accordingly, they will make them in ukraine. the cult for propaganda

will wash them off and they will continue to tour, talking about their so-called courage. in european capitals and in ukrainian cities, so the decision, uh, is already prepared. it is, uh, which will prohibit the exchange. uh here these people of azov and other war criminals, the decision is ready. tomorrow we will vote, as for any exchange, if necessary, we have enough exchange material, since thousands of ukrainian servicemen surrendered in other sectors of the front. here they can be exchanged, but this category we should not. now, in no way, even theoretically, to be included in any exchange lists should be a consequence , taking into account, and the relevant e-e bodies of the donetsk people's republic and the russian federation further responsibility for the crimes committed.

mortal qasim does not practice us, but there are life sentences. and in general, in principle, i think that here the qualification should certainly be given by the court. well, in general, i want to say that i will not speak big words about the turning point of the battle, many more are ahead, but the very fact that the selected, vaunted, ideologically motivated, well- equipped units of the armed forces of ukraine and the nationalist structures of ukraine capitulated today. realizing the futility of further i can agree with this resistance, but with the deputy, and the state duma, oleg matveyevich, this is what lies ahead. and i completely agree with everything else about ukraine, because there are prisoners of war, and there are war criminals and the attitude towards them should be fundamentally different, but, nevertheless,

despite the capitulation, or at least the beginning of the capitulation of azov, the steel in the collective west expects that ukraine will not only continue to resist, but will wage a war of attrition. that's about it today in plain text said the head of diplomacy of the european union barrel listen what kind of heavy weapons will be financed from the next 500 million euros? i would n't call it heavy weapons. these are the usual weapons for attrition warfare and armored tanks are the usual weapons used in such warfare. well, just like that, uh, with ease, yes, uh, the extraordinary head of the so -called diplomacy of the european union speaks of weapons not heavy, but conventional for a war of attrition. what is a war of attrition?

destruction of tens of thousands of people, and this is the suffering of millions. this is the destruction of the economy and war. at exhaustion in relation to ukraine, it may simply mean the end of this ukraine, but oleg anatolyevich is here. uh, how does this approach generally correspond to european values? we have heard a lot about the normative civil power of the european union, which is the power of soft power of values, all kinds of european humanisms and so on, all this from the head of european diplomacy. yes, it's funny to hear, because he talks precisely about weapons, which now turn out to embody europe. but what he gives out, he gives out his dream. that in general the war in ukraine will be a war of attrition. not ukraine, of course, but russia about ukraine, they have not whispered for a long time. this is just a consumable material now their main task, at least to withdraw everything that is possible from there. yes, that's the same

bread. ah, russia, in their opinion, should be exhausted in this war, despite the fact that russia does not conduct any mobilizations. despite the fact that russia did not even use its main weapon. there is no turned off the gas to the same europe well, they didn’t lay out a lot of any trump cards at all, including military goats, which even many of ours. ah, let's say the possibilities of electronic warfare, but in suppression. uh, it means electronically. we are not yet using the new ones. many not by name are not applied. uh, those that are in service there with anti- perks, for example, there are many, many different other things. it's just that the goat hasn't been opened yet at the time in europe record inflation record decline in foreign trade balance 65 billion last well, this quarter, yes, uh, it's not

it was generally in the history of europe there, they say, something like that was there in the seventy-fifth year, but it means that those people who remembered it have long been forgotten there. they are all already dead. and here, what uh serious problems for them all this delivers exhaustion they have. yes, that's why they honored for us to do this in afghanistan. but in general, while ukraine is afghanistan for europe and for the west. well, ukraine. i think that this is afghanistan in a cube also for itself, but for grandpa borel herself, in general, today it gushed amazing, and by its absurdity of statements, and maybe not absurdity, and another remarkable statement that he made today is that it turns out that the european union strongly supports the entry of finland and sweden into nato, uh, that is, it turns out igor yuryevich the european union already became the ultimate accessory. nato

may, in general, need to uh, so to speak, formally end the so-called common foreign defense policy of the european union will already agree that nato is the whole point. yes, because it is openly stated that the european union interested in what the united states is doing in order to solve the european union, in general, any. eh, the beginnings of his own subjectivity. no, i recalled the famous soviet poster, when a soviet soldier takes off his mask from a ram and suddenly sees a wolf's face there, well, and the appropriate call to action, as it were. and so it is today, if we take off the mask from the european union we will see the fangs of an all-automatic alliance indeed. today, the european union has actually become an appendage. nato and see what statements the head of the european

diplomacy. it would seem according to their status. he must look for diplomatic ways to resolve the most difficult conflict situations and act for the benefit of, first of all, the citizens of the european union, but today's statement is a barrel. they actually mean the encouragement of aggression, the continuation of the hybrid war, and for this hybrid proxy war, which will bring against russia on the territory of ukraine, every european taxpayer pays. today, a huge number of people leading the advanced countries of the west. just elementary saves in order to survive. and those homeless, those hungry in european countries, each of them got into the pocket of the european union today in order to finance this war in ukraine in the interests of the united states in this regard. we must be well aware that the potential of the current zelensky regime to join

the european union does not already look like that, but, let's say, but harmless, as it seemed before , in fact, today the european union has also turned into a military machine that finances, encourages and does everything to ensure that violence in ukraine reached its peak and climax. and by the way, the task of depleting russia includes, among other things, the desire to maximize the damage that the ukrainian armed forces inflict on their own economies on their cities to their citizens, based on what the eu and washington believes what exactly russia will take further care about feeding the population, the restoration of what was destroyed by the ukrainian armed forces, and so on, but the desire to rob looks especially vile and cynical. in anticipation of the imminent collapse of ukraine, withdraw maximize grain reserves of other valuable

resources for the west from there from ukraine in order to ensure that they feed themselves. it reminds me of the beginning of an epidemic to the species. remember, when the united states of america, a number of western countries simply bought up batches of medical masks, devices for artificial lung ventilation to save themselves by snatching these vital resources from others. just like today, those trains and those attempts to withdraw grain from the territory of ukraine are an attempt to arrange holodomor for the ukrainian population by the hands of the west, first of all, by the hands of the european union and the hands of the united states of america i think that barrel, among other things, is already behind such statements. exceeded his official powers, because, representing the council there is an intergovernmental dimension of the european union, he must represent the common denominator, and the positions of the member states, and he does not

represent the common denominator. as we spoke before with dmitry simons , those politicians, those forces, those leaders who speak out. uh, not for not only for the european union as an appendage of nato, not only for the european union as a geopolitical coalition that no one really needs, because there is a wife, but for the european union, as still an integration entity, one of them is noil macron, not by chance. he was just talking about what is unacceptable, or at least premature, for ukraine to join the european union. and he even offered to create a separate organization that would symbolize the belonging of ukraine. towards europe to the west, but not in as a member of the european union we will continue to discuss eu policy in an economic context after a little publicity. vanga prophecy of

the premiere on sunday at the first big technological bank, it is important to stay face to face with a person for three minutes in two clicks on one call in order to justify your trust to support you, really, issuing loans every day, sovcombank is closer to people, n, painkillers with paracetamol on affordable price and askofen ultra reinforced composition to combat migraine and others types of pain. vtb team, we have put together a set of special offers to support and develop your business. depositing cash for just 1 rub. settlement account and business card attractive deposit rates and other offers put vtb.ru point vtb help business. think for a

second. do you have one value that cannot be taken away or blocked? she stays with you even without money. this is the value of your communication with loved ones. hello baby, communicate at zero on the account on all megaphone tariffs, flash speech and in children's hospital, may 19 kinopoisk new items every week for all subscribers plus. adapted. and we helped to accept payments and not lose customers. keep accounts and not make annoying mistakes quickly transfer your business online our products for business will help you adapt to

any circumstances, the bank of the year in russia tinkoff is the only one who thinks to lose weight. for the first time helps to lose weight not only during the day, but also at night turboslim day night enhanced formula. collect your image on ozon dress zarina from 799 rubles. women's shoes from 899 rub. without music from social networks and a scooter subscribe to

mts premium for only 199 rubles a month movies tv shows music subscription to you rain scooter and 50 gb of internet filtrum is needed here quickly thanks to millions of microphone filters, as the sponge absorbs various bacteria toxins, helping to eliminate unpleasant symptoms. filter style to tidy up your belly for benefits for the whole family. this is lena and she has just found her dream apartment. arranged everything necessary for the purchase the documents. and now she has become the owner of an apartment in a nine-story building near the park, because the apartment is now being bought for mru care from pyaterochka discounts for you drinks from the blackhead 99.90 if there is one halva in installments for 10 months. and sausage with cashback up to 6%. everything i need from different cards

is in halva, just one card for everything. on the air, the big game of the european union continues unsuccessfully while discussing the sixth package of anti-russian sanctions, where the european commission proposed to include an embargo on russian oil, but in view of the resistance of hungary and also some other countries of the european union to accept this demand, this proposal has not yet succeeded. and now the united states, apparently. you understand that it is a disastrous thing to offer the european union to abandon the embargo on the import of russian oil, and to impose duties on the import of russian oil. that is, it turns out the european union will continue to consume russian. they will only pay more. and what will, in a corresponding way, affect the standard of living, but european ones.