the more oleg works, the younger he looks. soon they won't look like father and son. and like two brothers two stars fathers and sons on friday first grilled meat for my close friends i serve ketchup maheim ketchup maheev recommend number one against the pain of spasm and inflammation with periodic female headaches and other types of pain pentalkin we can do without pain look. create see you.

lose weight in a dream it's just a dream turboslim day night for the first time helps to lose weight not only during the day, but also at night at speed. only even faster, and you can connect only with our megafon tariffs and be the fastest megafon we bank renaissance credit for those who are looking for simple and affordable banking products. why you don't have to go to the office. apply online for a free credit card reasonable 145 days without

interest absolutely everything of the venetian bank of all kinds of fungus. may be contagious for loved ones mycoderil decisively helps to destroy the fungus up to 28% more profitable than the european counterpart. cinema 1tv presents what happened captain before the motorcycle should always be checked out. if you want, we can let you down.

benzon take care of the security of the hospital around the perimeter and patrol the entire facility, who can go on a mission with us? it was shot at me, apparently shot. cinema one tv presents i need the exact date of the wedding suggesting that i kill sasha for the first person you meet. why do i know our family news from the yellow press cinema 1tv presents and that he has already come to you. who resurrection

plant me? what where when the summer series of games on sunday at be the first to join your luck by getting guys up to 10,000 rubles. and what frebet will fall to you? mikhail

yurievich was caught red-handed for theft. and you release him from custody. i must remind you that the court is obliged to ensure the triumph of justice in each specific case in our case of a person. he stumbled for the sake of his family under the pressure of external circumstances. that is, you understand that he is guilty. i will not change my decision. i will complain your right.

let's talk. we already talked exactly a year ago, we just gave it, it’s clear, when you can be about your son. o what he did. we all know. so no need here. if you don't want him to, something happens too. listen to me carefully, if you are one of

your hats, at least look in his direction all. i have enough resources and strength. you can trust me. now to the exit bailiff. help the person got lost.

please don't call me again. ira anton

i need all the details. polyakov can come in, right? urgently? yes, it's on point.

yes, this is in the case of razin yakimov. yes, andrey yuryevich. i assure you. do i have something to show you? it doesn't matter although i understand roman is still his son, but will have to answer. i could have been a lot tougher.

you threw up on the road. why did i hear about it for the first time? so inhaler entry

what, why? they have a dna sample from the crash site dna must have found a sample for comparison . anton should disappear on the first flight out of here. there's money in the back of the briefcase. the passport is my consent to your independence. i mean, i'm not going alone. yes. anton you will do what i

said. and am i not visiting. stop. should i fly abroad? no i do not want. i'm tired. i don't i want to run away. i want it all to end, calm down. to you very soon i will definitely think of something, i will definitely think of something. sorry, now is not the best time, if not urgently, then urgently, we just had to follow or find requests from us for the detention of anton mikhailovich romanov for 17 years. it 's your son that's over the case broken. you signed, it's true, your son you signed.

good evening on the air, a big game as the russian special operation in

ukraine progresses successfully, the west and above all the united states continue a hybrid war against our country. important instruments of this hybrid war are the provision of an increasing number of weapons of military equipment and intelligence information to ukraine and anti-russian sanctions, the volume of which is unprecedented, and information war and trade restrictions and pressure on russian partners in the sudden world and much more. moreover, some of the steps that the united states is taking are aimed at killing two birds with one stone at once, for example, sanctions against the media information, this is both sanctions and an information war at the same time, and the united states, as you know , imposed sanctions against three russian tv channels, including channel one, and today the state duma of russia, apparently in response, adopted in the first reading a bill that allows you to close or restrict the activities of the media in russia those unfriendly

countries that have banned or restricted the russian media, we will discuss this and other subjects of russian western relations with the leading big games by dmitry syme, president of the center for national interests in washington, and maria vladimirovna zakharova, official representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, dmitry good evening. well, as i said, russia, apparently, took american steps in response to uh. uh, the first reading of the current bill. tell us how the situation looks from washington and what the united states actually did maria zakharova spoke about this, not only can she see where she is from, but maria is the ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary, the

head of the department of this information and the head of the department at the diplomatic academy. so uh you. i think you not only have more information, but you can also give it, if i may, so to speak, a strategic assessment. and i will only tell maria what i know, uh, with regard to this resolution regarding the sanctions that apply to russian federal television channels. on actually i know, i do quite a lot, but all these things don't fit together, because there are two things in the sanctions decree. and one part concerns specific sanctions that prohibit the constitutional services of accounting services, and there the provision of advertising. that is, as they say in the administration, this is the task of denying the russian federal channels the opportunity to earn

money, primarily advertising money in america, this is, as it were, serious, but limited. if you want some parameters, after all, here, uh, there is e is the possibility that someone else in the united states can still do these channels, but the other part. er, this is what is called sdn and i checked as requested. i was helped by our lawyers looked specially. what does it mean, this is a decision on the relevant website uh of the ministry of finance that these channels specifically first channel are placed in a category called sd uh, these bottoms are not sleeping. well, that is, a specially designated person as if a legal entity or

a specific person. and this kind of sanctions prohibit the provision of any services to those who are in this category, that is, in other words. uh, you can't pay rent, and you can't make a bank transfer, you can't pay for a moving car. well, even here it is believed that if someone gives you an interview, including for free, this is also a type of service. but uh, i couldn't get confirmation that in practice, uh, the administration wants federal channels, huh? literally a week later, e disappeared from the united states of such an experience a day. i do not have. and here's what's on the website of the ministry of finance speaks for itself. at least that's what the lawyers think, that you know if the administration has told you that they want federal channels to disappear from the

united states. good evening everyone. yes, it seems to me that there is nothing to tell us here, but here everything is clear. etching is underway, the next stage of etching the russian media from and their media field from in general, and the western media field, what difference does it make, how exactly do they call it? which, frankly , i don't see any need for. and so uh thoroughly study the legal side of this issue. this is just a cover-up for this, well, there is such an expression. you know america's party of lawyers. this is in this case, such, probably, an attempt to somehow use some kind of beautiful wrapper in their understanding in order to give this at least some legal dimension, but this does not change the essence. they would close. they just to some do not know,

but a presidential decree. or there, by a resolution by some decision of the congress or the senate, or they came up with some use of some articles the meaning is the same and implements from it for many years and we absolutely. in this case, i don't care how . they packed. hmm this decision justified it or explained and so on. and this, of course, has to do with direct correspondents , representatives of employees who are abroad, in particular the united states and interact with these television channels for their e, daily activities, but if you ask me, as a representative, and, so to speak, russian executive power. i mean, uh, the official representatives of the ministry of foreign affairs, then we react, in principle, to this trend and to specific facts. and we have been reacting

for a long time, of course, there are no questions here. how symmetrically it is mirrored and so on . e is also of great importance, because it is impossible to fully observe symmetry and mirror here, we will react and are already responding , as we see fit, but absolutely in this case it has nothing to do with our reaction to the attack on freedom of speech, of course no, just a response. she is extremely sensitive to e. the side that is taking uh, aggressive action against the russian media and here is the recent case of cbc. uh from the canadian uh from the canadian media, which uh was, so to speak. hmm unfortunately, already victims of our retaliation . due to the fact that there were blocked earlier today. glad that del franz showed that indeed. it is not just unpleasant for them and not just sensitive. and it calls. eh, very

such a strong kind of strong reaction. i would even say. for the sake of shock, because they are not used to this, they are used to exclusively one-sidedness. they are accustomed to the fact that the story begins as to how it is possible and legally. and so to speak, to resist filing lawsuits to hire lawyers to do something like that. well, i don’t know, there, political politically low coverage. well, so that we also pay money for this. and here we already understand what all this is leading to and what consequences, but there will be. if we go this way, so we do not go this way and act exclusively in response, so it will be with the media of the united states of america britain well, i spoke about this at a briefing today, that is, uh, so to speak, they should it’s another matter to understand that they are now pretending that they didn’t notice our comments, they will survive the time and wait until these retaliatory measures are taken and then they will pretend

that these are not russia’s retaliatory actions, but that this is, as it were, our attack, but in general , honestly, i am absolutely sincere now and it doesn’t matter what and how they say, we will squeeze out our reaction and take these steps that we consider necessary sanctions, but on the other hand the united states has a history of not imposing. those sanctions that are not officially proclaimed. in general, i believe that sanctions against the media. this is an extremely misguided policy, because the role of the media is shows the information as it is. and now, do you admit the possibility that, given the fact that, after all, i think the united states itself is interested in their correspondents, who continue to work in russia, their feed stations, which are still open in russia, so that they remain here your presence. well,

russia, of course, too. interested in being correspondents and channel one and others e da damari. eh, a little closer to reality. you say about some you know how beautiful pictures that there are some people who understand the highest values ​​of interests commitment to freedom of speech. whom do you mean, where are these people washington in london and in ottawa there are no these people, there is such a russophobic movement, so to speak, and which is well, or at least movements that are now using rosophobia. or finally stumbled upon the opportunity to implement it. they have all the good measures in order to block russia by all means and, first of all, information so that we cannot and to counteract the spread of their fakes. lies and so on, and in order to form your external in order to form your

internal information space. just in such a solo format, so that only they dominate and exclude any possibility of penetration of an alternative point of view or themes. the spread of our e-antitheses of the fact that those materials with which we disavowed dose their statements. and therefore, now, i assure you, no one thinks of any high value such principles, a in the united states of america a no one thinks about what the consequences will be for the american media. it's all gone, not something that is in the background. in general, everything was worthless, considering that energy security is put on horseback by the united states of america. okay, peace, their country's property, food security, i don't know the economic stability of the united

states of america itself. and what kind of value orientation is that? uh you say in their case im now the main thing is to shut everything up and information holes that still bring into the american media space some other different from their points of view, you understand, there was an opportunity to ban something else. they would have banned something else, but there is simply nothing more. understand when people who go out. uh, the invasion of the immortal regiment get immediately sentenced only because they got some piece of paper or a picture that says something about russia or some kind of conditional. yes, a deadline or some kind of deal or some kind of sanctions, as you call it, but the most real real time what we are talking about now, well, you just need to understand where we really are. and most importantly, they perfectly understand. they understand this very well from the point of view of their inner surface, that if

russia is a paradox, it is a phenomenon, it is a unique phenomenon, but it is a fact if russia is complex. temper and society are in unity. it is simply united, then in the united states any difficulty comes, on the contrary, to collapse. even a mini- minimum consensus, on even the most basic on questions, society begins to snarl at once to look for the guilty in the building, and the other party to find the responsible one and completely place on him all the blame for trampling on yesterday's idols and heroes. this is a fundamental cultural difference, you understand, so for them information is of fundamental importance. if only they will now allow to destroy this created myth of theirs

that gasoline prices in the usa are putin's gasoline prices, that price increases and inflation are putin's inflation, then what are they coming up with. these bidens nancy strips up to this psyki and so on. if they'll just let this rickety construct collapse completely. you understand everything from them there will be nothing left, they will simply be demolished and these will not be some kind of internal terrorists, as they call people, but ordinary us citizens who will simply begin to see clearly in one moment, you will understand that they have been deceived for so many years, cheated, and moreover, also involved in some kind of activity, which is actually completely uncharacteristic of american society, and these aggressors, who have reached the control levers with a russophobic ideology are by no means symbols of the people of the united

states of america. that's for sure. eh, i lived there, i worked, i lived there, because i was appointed to the agency, uh, in new york and i saw people of different people. i was in different states, this is 100% superficial and brought in by this very so-called political elite. and if people at some point suddenly, well, let's say from some program or a translated video, they will find out that this particular administration so cruelly deceived them. they already see the light in the form of a speech by their president, yes, who greets silence and shakes hands with emptiness, this can lead to disastrous consequences. i know that you know america well and i know that you and we talked about it. and that america has changed a lot

lately and one of these changes, which, indeed, as you said in america in general, does not really suit russian arguments. but this does not mean, of course, that america does not pay attention to russian actions, and in that number in the application of sanctions is not for me to tell you, but from the american side. but if you like, there is a certain flexibility built on cold pragmatism, including the idea of ​​a russian response, and what is interesting is that when the united states is dissatisfied with russian behavior , it is very openly loud and not even always diplomatically voiced. what could be the consequences of russia's behavior in this regard ? more restrained, but nevertheless, it would probably not be useless to know in washington. about what the answer you had in mind, here is the bill that

is being discussed in the duma, something else that stands behind the words about a possible or probable russian one. answer specifically, a aiming at your question. we are now developing a set of measures, and, well, there is already the first, so to speak, understanding, but without agreement with all interested parties. i would not like to talk about it. not because i want to pull up this intrigue absolutely. well, because we really agree on this with everyone who, well, in their area answers. e for these questions. but you you know, that’s how it’s interesting now you know about the internal political life of the united states of america, which, frankly, i was reminded in the highest, best sense of the word, you know this word by the chef of molecular cuisine, but it seems to me that you embellish everything much more banally strongly, the dish that on the table, and an absolutely absent team at all, an

absent team of managers in the administration. bali simply does not have them, and once again the most interesting thing is that we used to say that there are no high professionals. i don't know experts russia, and now i'm just saying, they are not there, they are physically. no place is occupied. they were not able to form a team, even during this past time in a year and a half they failed. although in general it was a pre-election team. but, when they came and started to take people, and the beaten places, it turned out that they couldn’t bring the fundamental team behind them, and then it turned out that they couldn’t bring anyone at all, and you know that, the second moment. even those who came are leaving. and in the case of dogs. he is not unique. this is not an exception, but she is just like the most, bright recognizable. uh, though an odious person, but

such dozens that left, despite the fact that they were on the democratic team for decades. he. maybe the last one has been preserved since obama, that is, the absence, in principle, of people who would manage the current processes in the united states this time. secondly, absolutely with periodic actions that do not fit in with words, deeds, or measures, the third moment, the inability, perhaps due to the first two factors, to calculate the actions of one’s own steps, actually steps. and of course, uh, absolutely helpless after receiving. and such a boomerang for now. it's a boomerang from what they do, but i think the more they press their sen on button, the more that boomerang will turn into a ricochet who yi decides and implements

there and who will live. uh, under the yoke, but of the policy that is destructive for the united states itself, which the current administrations are now pursuing. i say again, this is probably the first time in the history of the united states. i don’t know i do not presume to judge the subtleties. e, so to speak , the organization of the organization of the civil service at the beginning of the 20th century. the nineteenth i do not know the latest history. she is the first time, uh, such a reshetov in the a team of the current president, a and this is a huge problem. and even if i say now, now, even if i say now, what kind of response. we'll take it anyway, it won't come around anywhere in washington to hear. this is an echo to no one. that's the problem, and it's not just the direction related to russia, it's all the directions. this is all the agenda that fell apart in the us administration, they came up with some simply, well,

global climate ideas, the green agenda. what else was there? well, what was not there, what was left of this team cannot realize. yes, even a piece of their own agenda, given that they are not in full swing, just the political covid in quotation marks that covered them. they invented for themselves. i apologize dmitry i understand that this is not very pleasant to listen to and do not actually require you to agree with this, because i understand everything is unannounced. i know how now comes the american intelligence services to our compatriots. i know what they say to journalists, both domestic and foreign. i perfectly understand what kind of wave is going on now, but unorthy. well, in relation to everything that is somehow connected with our country. i understand all this very well, i sympathize with maria vladimirovna for clarity,

no one has come to me yet. maybe i need to trust a little upholstered that i did not deserve such attention, uh, but for now, along the lines of some official services. and, by the way, no representatives of the administration put any pressure on me . and here is what i agree with from what you said and what worries me very much. uh, it's uh your feeling, and as i understand it, it's not just your personal feeling. ah, the feeling of leadership. mida that, in general, now a constructive dialogue with someone is impossible for us. and that not only your words, but even your actions e cannot be rational who are they interpreted? did i understand you correctly. no, not exactly there. it just seems to me that it's already they have no one to talk to each other. that's the

problem, not with us. we are not talking about exclusively only about the absence. eh, normal or at least some kind of contacts on our line, the question is that those people who determine the policy of the current administration are theirs. no, they are not in the right place. they are busy saving or saving. well , some of them are already completely, but what about the basic things there, i don’t know the rating of my president or some kind of paradic activity to patch up some holes in the agenda and so on. that have a holistic policy. no, it's not clear what the united states thinks it wants, the united states thinks what it wants, uh, the administration doesn't understand. i'm sure this is incomprehensible to most of the vast majority of the us population. the only thing more or less now? uh, so to speak, it can connect, uh, illogical actions, uh, the american administration - this is exactly the very

russophobia that, uh, in their interpretation, explains all the prices of gasoline. uh, don't know inflation high prices in stores some such strange state people in the administration. here is the only one. but if this thread is pulled out, then everything will fall apart . therefore, i am saying that there is no global agenda for the current administration that would be implemented, except for one thing to do something else to harm russia. this has become dominant, this has become dominant. tell me if it's not, maybe i don't know something, although i read a lot. i look with many people, but this is exactly how to make the life of the russian people a hostage of the next. your phobias, this is what dominates, this is what rules, this is what controls these people. and this, well, this is an indicator

of degradation, alas, not just decline, but degradation. maria vladimirovna i completely agree with you that the united states is pursuing a policy aimed at weakening russia, they proclaim it officially, but you absolutely rightly noted in your previous one. answer about ricochet and so i just wanted to. eh, here i am, wait. i did not say that they are pursuing a policy aimed at weakening russia, it was a key moment before this. it is very interesting. it used to be more or less a slender concept, and she is a slender concept. she collapsed. why because from this political course, which they began to implement in relation to our country, containment of opposition. well, and so on. they began to suffer in the first place because their

political and economic blitz had failed. i, and on this the main bet was made, that a number of tough, as they talked about hellish sanctions, would be set in motion. you just know how the bull thieves cord will set fire to something, everything will explode, collapse, and then come out. they are all in white. but this did not happen, and for some reason this light from the cord bizarrely reached for washington. that's all. you know maria it was a very interesting conversation for me personally. eh, very significant, because, again, the documents are repeated. if i understood you correctly, er, then, in general, they came to moscow. e to opinion. uh, to some extent symmetrical to the opinion that exists in their no one who they

say that while vladimir putin is in power, it will be very difficult to agree, probably impossible. and in general, if i understood you correctly in moscow, there is an impression that it is impossible to come to an agreement with this administration. and that if there are any hopes, then they are connected in general with other results of the american elections. i'm wrong. well, not quite, i said, otherwise, i said that not with this administration. it is possible or impossible to agree that in this administration the land is needed in america, there is a massive shortage of people in their places. these are different things , you understand, this has nothing to do with us. is not depends on us. it was something that went wrong with them. again, you can imagine. i repeat once again, perhaps i don’t know any stage of historical uh in the politics of the united states, but

i just remind you that we are talking about a great power with, as this power says, a powerful economy in which a strong, so to speak, state-owned. let such as they say, as it were, superstructure management, but one way or another, it still exists. and now, is it still possible to imagine, i don’t know, 10 years ago, to be in key positions, despite there were no people for the theses of a global nature declared before the elections, and moreover, before the next presidential elections, more than half of the term of 2/3 of the term remained, that is, such a mass exodus is usually typical for the united states of america. i mean administrations. e, somewhere around well, when the third year ends, and the fourth begins, and now the people ran, and here, even half the term has not passed. only a third of whom they are not in their places in

key positions, you understand? it just might not so advertised, as i'm talking about it now, maybe it's not emphasized, but forgive me. i read interesting materials from american experts. you are not the only american experts. eh, i check them. i come to the same opinion that the key figures under the key areas. they formed the basis of the sasha administration's agenda. and if there are no these people, so are the agendas. there is no one who will implement it, you understand, and most importantly, that even half of the term has not passed, all these things and, uh, so to speak, but the interesting state of the current american the president in the aggregate, alas. uh, well, they lead to such not very funny thoughts. maria vladimirovna i still cannot but ask you a question about another very important instrument of hybrid

warfare, which the biden administration, despite the costs it faces both in domestic politics and in the economy and in relations with the non-western world . yes, and even with its allies , it continues to introduce arms deliveries in relation to russia. here is biden. uh, the other day i signed a 40 billion aid package for ukraine and for in the west, many experts express fears that such measures could lead to an escalation and spillover of the conflict to the level of russia, nato, and indeed, when we look at what kind of weapons begin to be exhibited to ukraine, then, ah, it really becomes alarming, for example, 155 -millimeter howitzers with guided, and shells are again talking about deliveries. uh, reaper drones, and long -range and so on and so, do you share these fears about a possible escalation and how russia will generally react to

er, the current policy of the bytan administration, you still need to understand what you mean by the word escalation. it seems to me that it has already begun a long time ago, and it has become alarming. all for a long time too. who understands what is happening with our planet. and let's talk now more substantive concretely, but certainly. this involvement with the union of the states is of a destructive and aggressive nature. it is possible to develop this idea further in different ways, but this is obviously fixed. well , better than the former us president ej said. bush who is the son of former us president george w. bush but no one has said. he said the video is literally available. a week ago, that the main mission of ukraine is to kill as many russians as possible, this was said by a person completely involved,

or maybe not completely aware, but involved in discussions at the level of the deep state of the deep state, let me remind you. his father was the head of the american intelligence services , the president of the united states he himself was the president of the united states and the media did not change the memory of two terms. they are involved in energy business. uh so to say the united states of america well in general such hmm kind of clan guys and uh i think he said something i don't know if he thinks or doesn't think this is such a moot point. but at least what they heard and hear around them is the mission. ukraine, i repeat, this is murder. as many russians as possible, that's why everything else is lined up in the same way in a terrible bloody, absolutely immoral criminal that is absolutely not for us, specifically the latest

deliveries of american weapons, which, according to president zelensky, uh, well, in some respects can be decisive, because they include weapons such as harpoon missiles, which allow you to hit naval vessels at sea distance and uh, the golden, fire rocket system, too, which operate at a great distance. and now i don’t know if you paid attention, but president zelensky and his advisers have changed their tons over the past few days, if only a few days ago. they talked about the upcoming ukrainian victory and everything looked like a. well, if not to the sounds of, uh, about the victory march, then at least it created the impression of great optimism in kiev. and suddenly now they began to talk. what if these

new types of weapons are not supplied to them, then it will be very difficult for them, uh, it’s scary that thousands of ukrainian soldiers will die and uh, there are supporters of the supply of these weapons. some of them are already delivered in the united states , naturally in brussels, and they say, but if we supply this weapon, something like that, because we have already presented weapons, and in general, this did not cause any serious russian response. so i'm wondering if you think that as the arms that ukraine gets are becoming more and more modern , becoming more and more powerful, and there is more range here. now, if all this happens, it will, uh, lead to a serious dangerous escalation, or russia, in general, in principle, decided that russia what should she do? and what

does the collective west do about this? secondary? and dmitry it seems to me that you have touched on an exceptionally important point. uh, because yes, there is a qualitative attempt, at least a qualitative buildup of armaments, but uh in the current situation. i don’t think that russia will go for a horizontal or, even more so, vertical escalation of the current conflict, although i am not, but a military expert, and russia will continue to destroy these weapons systems on the territory of ukraine, russia will destroy and weaken supply chains within the territory of ukraine, with the help of which the united states, but substitute these weapons. and actually grind them and i don’t think that in the current situation , or at least in the short medium term, such weapons. they can somehow

qualitatively, uh, turn the tide on the battlefield in russia. the overwhelming overwhelming superiority in firepower, including in multiple launch rocket systems , including in howitzers, missiles and e.t.c. yes, but i think that if necessary, uh, for this. er, if the circumstances are right, then russia can use more resources in the corresponding special operation, but at the same time it will remain a special operation. yes, it is necessary to understand that russia is still conducting an operation in ukraine with forces that are actually involved in peace conditions. yes, after all, there is no martial law in russia, there is no mobilization in russia, the russian armed forces are today, in quantitative terms, the armed forces of peacetime peacetime

, and there is, accordingly, a resource for an increase in these forces, if such a need is required, uh, a similar need, but meanwhile russia will be. it just seems to me to grind, and these are the supply of weapons. and this is grinding and incapacity. these deliveries will somehow turn the tide of hostilities will be another very serious blow to the reputation of the united states, maria vladimirovna, thank you so much for this conversation, always very interesting. thank you very much. the big game program will return in a few moments we drive matvey petrovich siberia in the morning and i have income from the province for many years to the new

governor, the new khan of tobolsk, let's see what kind of tiger he put in his pocket yes rogue well, comrade, start new orders

, a film adaptation of the novel by alexei ivanov equip. we always bet on people. for us, confidence is not just a word, we value traditions and look beyond the horizon, we build the future, we invest in our earth a confidence of dignity. buy newborn diapers and our softest diapers premium-ke on wildberries

i have something tender for you papillae will be in seventh heaven from moscow gourmet ice cream pure line, please your taste buds. incredible stories for everyone to keep a secret based on a real miracle in 3 days. we have not found a single living person in the cinema since june 9th. we help businesses in any situation to accept payments to keep accounts and sell on the internet.

our products will help you adapt to any circumstances tinkoff is the only bank of the year in russia, when your nerves are at the limit, you need a magnel with b6 is a magnet reinforced with vitamin b6 magnels with b6 is up to 30% more affordable than a similar imported drug. magnet beautician cares means to love -30% for serving and cooking utensils magnet. buy cheaper, travel around russia, apply for a tinkoff black card before june and get free service forever tinkoff is the only one without films from the music of social networks of scooters

, the quality is at its best at a bargain price. why do you need so many cards, if any, one halva with installments for 10 months? and a flask with cashback up to 6%. everything, that i need from different cards there is only one card in halva for everything, my motor is always under control with cardiomagnyl your heart is a complex mechanism and regular intake of cardiomagnyl helps to take care of his heart health under control every day. welcome to the ozone summer discount marathon for a whole week of discounts. buy easily every day new items with discounts from june 21 on ozon

barbie baby sitter accessories set for 999 rubles. and a powerful professional march hair dryer for 899 rubles. incredible selection of jewelry in the mobile app and in stores sunlight sunlight the perfect gift sunlight is love and on the air the big game besides the hybrid war against russia the united states is drastically intensifying its confrontational policy towards china and uh ended yesterday. uh, biden's visit to asian countries and in. tokyo in particular. uh, apparently betrayed it. uh, extra momentum, and biden famously, uh, made a speech in tokyo in which he stated that he and the united states would use military force. e

against china will join e against china in a war in if china attempts to militarily regain control of taiwan from taiwan, this is the most pressing issue in us-chinese relations, despite the fact that the white house tried to disavow the president's words. in fact, everyone heard exactly what the byte said, and everyone believed that the united states was indeed changing. in particular, shinzo aba, and the former prime minister of japan today gave an interview in which he said yes, the united states is changing its policy on the taiwan issue, abandoning its former positions of strategic uncertainty and shift to a policy of strategic certainty. in addition, the united states is pumping weapons into taiwan. moreover, given the experience of the ukrainian military conflict. the new york times wrote about it today look.

the biden administration has stepped up provisions to overhaul taiwan's defense systems as it plans to strengthen its own military presence in the region and try to deter a possible attack by the chinese military. the us leadership is learning from its weapons policy . ukraine to form a more powerful taiwanese army capable of repelling a possible naval invasion by china, which has one of the world's largest troops. the us goal is to turn taiwan into a porcupine, a territory teeming with weapons and other defense systems. and which it would be too painful to attack to build up its power and toughen rhetoric, the united states is trying to draw a fine line between deterrence and provocation to break loose, moreover, into a provocation and uh, you don’t think that the united states is supplying taiwan with weapons.