the biden administration has stepped up the conditions for restructuring taiwan's defense systems as it plans to increase its own military presence in the region and try to deter a possible attack by the chinese military. in the world of troops. the goal of the us is to turn taiwan into porcupines, that is, the territory replete with weapons and other defense systems. and on which it would be too painful to attack to build up its power and toughen the audience, the united states is trying to draw a fine line between deterrence and provocation think that the united states is supplying taiwan with weapons, providing it with intelligence by supplying it. the environment

, including anti-ship and so on, can do not restrain, but rather provoke china, even despite biden's statement that they will allegedly enter the war. i think you are absolutely right. i would just clarify that the risk is not that you can break into a provocation, but the main risk. e, is that, and not even a risk, but the reality of trying to play e. uh, on this kind of thin line between deterrence and provocation, the main problem is that you undermine the policy of containment. here is a policy of deterrence, which, uh, is usually associated with nuclear weapons, but also the policy of containment and here the concept of containment is used as a common expression. it is based on what it is based on the fact that you send some kind of warnings that the other side believes, considers them reliable and appropriate. in this

way, they adjust their e, policy to do or not do something. that's what the united states is doing now they completely destroy the ability of others to understand themselves and to believe in anything, then statements are made, then they are disavowed, then they say no, in fact this is the correct occurrence. that's how they say with such a policy that we are smearing everyone, that is, but with such an approach, the policy of containment. it ’s just impossible, uh, to carry it out, because in your statement they stop trusting them, they stop believing, and therefore you can’t restrain anyone, don’t induce everyone to do something, but begin to focus on what is called the worst on the worst scenario, a the worst-case scenario is not even that the united states turns taiwan into a

porcupine, but. uh, on which china could not attack, what about the fact that the united states is turning taiwan into a poisoned pill that they would at least like to feed to china, that is, they would like to convince taiwan that it is protected , they would like to convince japan that america is committed the security of japan. convince them all that they can behave as harshly as possible, and push china to attack taiwan and, in principle, implement approximately the same uh scenario that was implemented in ukraine, that is, there is a player who voluntarily takes on myself. well, or not entirely voluntarily, but due to deceit, partly coercion takes on the role of a geopolitical one, and a suicide bomber, but the united states is being destroyed, and it

is simply impossible to deal with them, e.g. how to put up a serious uh, military shield in front of them. well , actually, what is north korea doing that , uh, presented biden with such a parting gift and, after his departure from tokyo, fired three rocket shots. but here's what surprises me the administration's lack of a byte on any proactive policy towards north korea. yes , they maintain sanctions, but beyond that they do nothing at all. yes, trump, at least he personally met with kim jong-un before trump, there were six-party negotiations, some processes now it seems that the biden administration is so concerned about containing china that north korea is somehow ignored, or forgotten, or she she just doesn't understand what to do. uh, how do you explain the american politics. well, biden, being in the ambassador's region already hello kim jong with the words they remember him and remember

north korea, but certainly the main subject of interest is china and i can agree with the opinion that it would be an ideal scenario for the united states of america to provoke an invasion by military means of china and to taiwan to use in that mechanism of pressure to contain china and support taiwan well, the role of the european union here, the same japan should obviously play australia new zealand and south korea but all the same, here's the role of a regional suicide to a greater extent all the same. in my opinion , japan claims in this case, which, it seems to me, in general, from the point of view of foreign policy planning and assessment of real military and geopolitical risks

, plays a very dangerous game. as for north korea, the regime there is stable, even under the most severe sanctions and external isolation, it managed to create the most important thing. what is holding back the unleashing of a big war against north korea is the nuclear missile shield. by the way, well, there are different estimates, but they also say that a large group of missilemen from masha, up to the point that they brought the design documentation there or not, we don’t know, but we clearly see the stunning progress in the field of more and more new types of intercontinental ballistic weapons that north korea demonstrates. i think that against the backdrop of such geopolitical tensions in the region, it was clearly no coincidence that another air patrol performed by our lks strategic bombers

russia with the people's liberation army air force. china , we probably still need to go further. here are enough episodic actions to move on to more strategic plans. we used to have very good contact. i hope it will continue when the general staff of the armed forces, the chief operations directorate of the general staff, interacted with chinese colleagues, perhaps we should talk about the possibility of strategic consultations in the field of joint nuclear planning, perhaps the time has come. it will once again underline the level of trust in contacts and the emergence of new options for rapprochement and development of relations, we are talking about a military bloc, we are talking about a military one. let's say he is a full-fledged union , but it is obvious that in the field of strategic deterrence. we have to go so

far with china. as far as moscow and e, beijing can afford it in this regard. here is the position after all, i think it is a principled one, which was taken by the official authorities of the prc supporting russia in the situation in which we find ourselves uh after the start of a special military operation from the point of view. here are western sanctions attempts to collapse, china is clearly projecting this whole situation onto itself, and these stress tests, uh, that were carried out from the point of view. and what will happen to the chinese economy, the financial system, if suddenly similar sanctions are applied, a fairly good indicator that beijing is completely pragmatic about the situation. we have a common enemy. it is the united states of america that is precisely the enemy, the geopolitical adversary, but the most important task after all, the united states if a military provocation succeeds, then

indeed, again, use the european union as an example, and the way he used it is against the e russian federation, that is, to finally finish off the european economy, make it non-competitive and, in particular, force european companies to break off contacts with china , if it starts, uh, a military invasion of taiwan well , it seems to me that china is showing restraint here, but he understands there are certain lines, but he won’t overcome the lines for himself yet, but that’s not less. uh, this whole situation once again shows that it is the united states of america today that is the main destabilizing force in almost all regions of the world, that’s for sure, and it seems to me that this policy of the united states is not liked by all of its allies, including south korea, but, because south korea has been very refraining from overtly engaging in anti-china politics. she didn't join watts. she is not attached. yes, she constantly emphasizes that

he is not opposed to the american south korean alliance in china, but he against north korea and that's when the united states is focusing entirely. uh, in china and stir up taiwan issues on the one hand, and on the other hand say hello. kim jong un. yes , they say that there will be no proactive policy here. this is very. it seems to me that the new south korean leadership may not like it either. and another ally with which the united states is exacerbating relations right now is turkey. today, negotiations are taking place in ankara between turkey and finland. sweden. about finland's and sweden's possible accession to nato, as is well known, turkey, meanwhile, says no, and, uh, rolled out a whole list of requirements for stockholm, uh, helsinki and already these requirements. satisfaction will be very difficult, because they presuppose not only the rejection

of any relationship with those forces that the anchor considers terrorist, it is the workers' party. uh, kurdistan and the golenists, but also the extradition of the persons concerned, uh to turkey, and the lifting of those restrictions that sweden has in finland at one time they led in relation to turkey, but for the sake of it . uh, violation attributed to her violation of the rights of the kurds. so, at the same time as these negotiations, the fate of which has not yet been dreamed of. and turkey, as you know, is planning a new military operation in syria, and so today the united states stated that they are categorically against this military operation. yes, it was an official statement from the state department ivan alekseevich it seems to me that it is not very wise to create additional conflict in the current situation. and if really the united states will now aggravate relations with

turkey over its planned military operation from syria i don't think erdogan will be more capable of an agreement on expansion in finland , sweden and nato why is the united states doing this? i have, uh, the optimistic version. i'm not sure that it's correct, but there is, e, i usually act as a pessimist, but there is an optimistic one. it consists in the fact that the united states is within the framework of my conception of them. the main task now is not to punish not obediently. well, or rather, they are trying to punish the most important disobedient russia and china and china and all the rest , they are not until their hands reach them. the most important thing is to consolidate their own and those who do not consolidate, they are ready to eject e from their e, which means allied ship, and here i am. it seems to me that there are signs that they

want to throw turkey off an allied ship, maybe as a warning to everyone uh, everyone else, well, either re-educate in the elections that will be in uh next uh next year , so maybe they are interested. now it’s not in quick agreement in turkey, but in erdogan tightening the time, and in a year to try to change him in the elections, or even they are interested in erdogan acting too abruptly and, for example, leaving nato. in general, maybe its going to be strategic. yes, this will, of course, be a strategic loss for the united states itself. but on the other hand, turkey is now such a, well, conditionally ally in the united states, einata, if their main task now is still not to expand their power. let incomplete but at all a task. to consolidate maximum power on those who remain under their power,

turkey then camps rather interferes than e. how, how it helps, so i do not exclude the possibility that such an undercover ah, struggle, uh, around uh, the withdrawal of turkey and nato is starting, but that is another question. in what form does pushing her a mean declaring the same, uh, abnormal power that they consider? the same north korea or someone else and or uh, expulsion from nato or suspension of turkey's membership in nato as a warning to others, but i don't i rule out that thoughts are already appearing in this direction, but this is an optimistic scenario, the pessimistic scenario is that and this is just another stupidity that will be disavowed tomorrow the day after tomorrow confirmed. on and everyone is confused about how it really is, i

honestly lean towards the second option, because, uh, turkey still has the second largest conventional military in nato and against the backdrop of the weakness that they demonstrate european union countries, others european nato countries after all. uh, the united states will try here. um, you can imagine a conflict where they will fight together during the prospects with a friend no together. ah, for example, uh, the turkish military and uh, let's say the british or american conflicts really pose together the last time was afghanistan here and in addition, uh even on iraq. uh, the united states used turkish bases. after all, bases, engineer-leagues - this is the key base. yes, or rather the iraqi conflict, there is no afghan conflict. no, in syria it’s hard for yourself to do this, uh, there may be a new

conflict, a very terrible conflict, because europe, heading for the rejection of russian energy carriers, cannot replace them with any other, how to take them from the middle east and if guardianship plus says that that we support the agreement we will not give you a single drop of extra oil. this means that a redistribution of the middle east may begin, and it is not by chance that forms' wife wrote such a program in february. the end of the middle east is getting more and more addicted about that everything is wrong in the middle east , that they should put up more oil. e to europe energy carriers. we already see pressure on the text of literally political pressure on the text of those countries that are partners, or at least not that our allies, those who did not agree to participate in russian sanctions. here's some real pressure. and the next step. just imagine, now they are provoking world hunger provoking. arab street on the uprising as

it was in the eleventh year of the arab spring it also also started with the fact that food has risen in price, for which they now need wheat from e ukraine in order to have a resource that can be controlled by throwing up or taking away this hunger, not giving. and now they can blow it up, they can fight the arab world together with europe. and who knows what their layouts are? e, igor yuryevich very briefly, that is, i think that a great potential threat now exists for countries such as the united arab emirates if saudi arabia because the united states america apparently, at the level of some already political decisions, the deep state can decide to destabilize these regimes. because those countries that control, in general, oil and gas and at the same time are not going to comply with the directives that are sewn from washington , they potentially pose a threat to us plans to

establish control over the whole world in this regard. i think that both an expert dialogue and a dialogue between the special services of the emirates of saudi arabia and the russian federation are necessary in order to assess these new risks together and develop measures. how can we parry them together? these are already real things, because, uh, knowing how the united states of america operates, we cannot exclude that such attempts will be made to undermine the situation in the middle east in the persian gulf zone and to destabilize. these are the key countries today, on which a lot of ip depends. and in general, in terms of the balance of energy security in the world, the united states is rapidly losing its positions in the middle east, this is absolute. truth they quarreled with saudi arabia. they did not make friends with iran, they aggravated relations with

turkey and therefore yes, the threat that in this context they will destabilize this region, including using the food factor, is very high and of course, russia is necessary, and take this into account in its strengthening dialogues with strange middle east we will continue in a few moments. he came this policeman i gave him. girl final series each

organism needs its own unique approach to health, download the application sber i am a pharmacy in the family, everyone communicates in their own way. you don't want to write , you don't want to talk. write connect the general tariff for the family. set up minutes and the internet so

that everyone has enough beeline on your side. think about losing weight not only during the day, but also at night turbosland night enhanced vtb formula we have put together a set of special offers to support and develop your business depositing cash for just one ruble a current account and a business card attractive deposit rates and other proposals for business dot vtb.ru vtb help with business. catch a new joke, shop with a magnet card and collect all the jokes. incredible selection of jewelry in the mobile app and in sunlight sunlight stores the perfect gift sunlight is love. how is it you

remember what the name is about dizzy to improve cerebral circulation, work of the brain, memory restoration and dizziness reduction, i will not forget the effect now. the explosive taste of ice cream cheerful cactus will give a holiday in your taste buds ice cream pure line, delight your taste buds. it does not matter how the rates on the exchanges change. we always bet on people. for us, the state is not millions, but confidence, dignity, pride in this is our strength, the strength of our country. fsb believe people, traveling around russia, book accommodation on the site daily.ru apartments, guest houses at affordable prices, more than 100,000 options for every taste. and a super cashback of 30%. care in pyaterochka discounts for

you frutonyanya juices at 28.90. anxiety insomnia habitual actions no longer help. afobazol helps to cope with anxiety and insomnia afobazon 4 weeks for the most pronounced effect. we help businesses accept payments, keep accounts, sell on the internet, our products will help to adapt to any circumstances , the bank of the year in russia, tinkoff, is the only one we deliver with love. today 20% discount on nuklarella vitamin complex up to 50% discount

on heel pedicure cosmetics. were waiting every time you are delayed at the airfield. i'm worried, sorry for the curiosity, who is this german, with whom your enters the theater, she is also a student at the conservatory because of austria. tonight, the guys will get in touch for the last time, the transmitter will sort out the lake nearby. i won't be able to see you anymore. no, all the time i hear the clatter of the chase behind my back, i feel how the back of my head breathes. i knew for a long time that i'm not ingrid for you, but only harassing demands on sunday on the first broadcast , a big game in europe, there is a reflection on their military weakness, which

is most acutely manifested now in the conditions of the russian special operation in ukraine and jose barrel eu high representative for foreign policy is desperately urging eu member states to build up their military muscle, listen don't think that peace is the natural order of things, the natural order of things is war, and here in europe we used to believe that peace is the normal state . we live in a very dangerous world and europeans. they don’t want to know that they live in a dangerous world and how these big birds that stick their heads into the ground in order to survive we must be united and better understand how the world works if this war did not become a signal for awakening then what will be this signal. we must draw a conclusion from this war. look, european armies won't be able to fight a war like the one in ukraine for more than two weeks. they just run out of ammo. well, indeed

, in the last one, barrel is right, because, for example, a scandal has already broken out between germany and poland a and polish president andrzej duda, says that germany has violated its obligations and does not substitute tanks anymore leopard, despite the fact that poland is already almost all of its own. own tanks of soviet origin, but delivered to ukraine now is without tanks, but here's what worries me, frankly speaking, and i want to ask about it very quickly and e igor yuryevich and ivan alekseevich only really very quickly here, otherwise the awakening of the european union about which bel speaks. after all, it contradicts the very nature of the european union, because the european union was created in order to ensure their sleep and in the conditions of this dream they quite happily existed in the last cold war under american hegemony. now, if they start to wake up in the national

capacity, then this is death for the european union . if they wake up within the framework of the eu as a whole, what borel calls for is to deprive the strange members of the last attributes of sovereignty in the military sphere, and this, too, will accordingly blow up the european union, because as yet member countries from the remnants of su. they don’t want to refuse it, how to be barrel calls for the militarization of the eu, in fact, this will be the nato euro inside big nato calls for increased military spending. well, it feels like he wants to try on the role. well, no one. stoltenberg is only a lower rank, so to speak. eh, everything. this certainly shows on the one hand the crisis of the weakness of the current european union, because there are already 3 months on the planning horizon. and we see that it is already impossible to introduce more and more new sanctions, millions of

refugees are already beginning to be deprived of various kinds of preferences. public opinion is already beginning to turn against it. these frantic masses of people who fled ukraine, screaming and demanding incredible privileges, but uh, this is still a rather dangerous indicator that europe can again practically embark on the path of preparing for a big war and we can see the new 1933 ahead. where will it happen in which country in which european capital, but it is quite obvious that these are the trends, when under the polished european democracy, we again see the brown color today in this no longer who has no doubts ivanovich, in short, it is the rejection of the idea of ​​peace and the european union

based on the idea of ​​peace and the transition to the idea of ​​a common europe based on force, through which supposedly peace should be achieved. in our history, this has already been napoleon and such attempts to unite europe without the peaceful philosophy that europe had in the previous 70 years after the second world war. how did you make such attempts to unite europe? and? well, i also remembered charlemagne charlemagne napoleon e, hitler, such attempts the unification of europe and now whether we continue it and this is the barrel they end for europe in the forty-fifth year of disaster, they end, but if andrzej duda, uh, demands leopard tanks from germany, then the prime minister of poland is not only marowiec, judging by around the demands to transform the european union. soviet union communist soviet union and let me remind you that a couple of days ago, uh, matthäusz-morovetsky. uh,

came up with a brilliant idea. uh uh norway actually gets too much money to share you have to share. come on, the norwegians- uh, the norwegians told him that they would not share, norway is not a member of the eu okay but today, matthäusz morovetsky went even further. he said that those european union countries that continue to import russian oil should pay other european union countries that have proudly refused to import russian energy, including poland, because those that import russian oil are in a better competitive situation. they just get oil cheaper. yes, but poland which proudly declared that now we will only receive democratic american lng. yes, she pays more - this, as it were, puts her in a less competitive situation. and here are countries such as germany,

countries such as hungary, which do not refuse hungary, especially from russian oil. yes, they should pay more e and compensate for her voluntary defiant refusal from russian oil. uh, alexander alexandrovich, what is it, well, you can refer to it as a soviet upbringing, but i i'm afraid that this is a new model, this is the stuffing. some new model of interaction between european countries, when sovereignty is really taken away, and not only political, but economic, is taken away from the country, reduced to a single point brussels, because that's just it. he says, a barrel, that is, a single reich. yes, it should be not only held together by political things, but by economic and financial ones. and finances. for this world, they decide everything. to give. you already control everything in general, that is, this is a step, an attempt to see how the

europeans will react. um, hmm, you won’t be able to immediately try the other way, because they have a debt crisis ahead and it’s up to them to decide who to give money to always buy, who will be supported by the european central bank, who will not be supported remember how they are in the case of greece. here they just stuffed greece. they were almost ready to throw out the entire loan from the european union for 13 billion euros. at the same time, in the coronavirus, they printed 3.7 trillion euros. they just took it and printed it, but, it turns out, it was possible. that's what it says, that is, a change in the model of governance in europe. well, here's another question for you, also continuing the topic of e-policy of the european union. and today the european commission proposed a bill in accordance with which it is possible if it is adopted by the council and the eu, the european parliament, it will be possible to confiscate those russian assets that are frozen by the european union. yes, and to direct it to some needs, we are talking so far from

private ones. yes, this is a bill, and the confiscation of private russian assets of russian entrepreneurs, which means the european union estimates the amount of these assets frozen, er, at 10 billion euros and, er, means prius , provided that these entrepreneurs violate the sanctions that have been imposed against them, but besides this, in the european union, it is being discussed another issue is the confiscation. not only private, but also state sovereign russian assets the very funds of the russian central bank that the european union, together with the united states , froze and at the same time germany is a minister. e finance, in germany, christian linder is just saying that germany will support precisely this confiscation , not a freeze, but the confiscation of russian sovereign state funds. that is, both are discussed, respectively. what

consequences will occur for the world financial system and for the european union in particular in both the first and second cases, well, germany remembered the experience of the second reich when, during the first world war, the germans arrested the ownership of russian private individuals and state property in germany because businesses were attracted. uh, the russian empire made a symmetrical move and confiscated the property of german industrialists. here is the first consequence. yes, because the answer will be symmetrical. on the one hand, on the other hand, when you, e, build the strength of your dollar and euro currencies on the fact that there are uniform rules for the whole world that there is an institution of private property on the fact that these are financial world financial centers, which this right maintain, maintain and base on it, there will be no more financial centers in frankfurt will be the financial center in london they will be somewhere else in shanghai in moscow maybe

in dubai there. uh, here i will not, which actually confirms the imperative of russian policy, but a turn to the east, a turn towards africa and building up relations not with the western world as a whole, and today the whole world celebrates africa day on may 25 , 1963, at a conference in odessa, baby was created organization of african unity, which later became the african union council. and the union played a crucial role in the deliverance of african countries from colonial dependence, and they remember this and see russia as a friend of a partner, a country that can help a lot of african countries, but at the same time is not capable, unlike some other countries, of somehow enslaving them and do not pursue such a goal. vladimir putin today delivered a congratulatory telegram to the heads of state of the governments of african countries, and the minister of foreign

affairs. sergei lavrov spoke to the diplomats of african countries and touched upon one of the most pressing issues for africa today food security topics. now listen to the minister of foreign affairs. we know that the country of africa is one of the most vulnerable in terms of ensuring food security, part of the states of the continent is critically dependent on the import of agricultural products from the russian federation, we are aware that these supplies are of great importance for maintaining social stability in order to achieve the benchmarks stipulated by the approved un sustainable development goals. i would like to once again firmly assure russia fulfills and will continue to fulfill in good faith its obligations under international contracts in terms of export supplies of food, fertilizers, energy carriers and other

goods africa urgently needs. this is very important. africa is russia's friend. the continent is our natural partner in the multipolar world and a very promising market for russian goods. including both food and energy, a promising market for russian services and in the context of a hybrid war with the west, the role of africa for russia is only growing, so it is very important to increase russian presence on the black continent is diplomatic, economic, informational and humanitarian, and to convey to african countries the truth that the west is responsible for the current food crisis and, of course, it is necessary to help africans overcome this crisis for this russia really. there are all possibilities. it was a big game. goodbye.

we saw the video, now i ask this question with a special meaning. i am more and more surprised at the level of cynicism of the kiev regime in their version of the alternative stories. just imagine europe from fascism was liberated by ukrainian troops. we will talk about this and much more in the program today. this is an anti-fake program, and here we are fighting against fakes and disinformation today in our studio dmitry drozdenko, military expert dmitry sidorin, a big data specialist, and timur shafir. secretary of the union of journalists of russia thank you for coming to our studio today to sort out a huge number of fakes and they were refuted, but let's start with this and

he's a really interesting printed document we've seen a lot of fake printed documents. here is one of them in lc. prepare for the mobilization of children from 16 years. and even women's photo documents got information to us. this requires confirmation dmitry here you are smiling. so you know all about this feige. remember the story of looting and e. well, including the looting of some valuables, this is the story, when a hat is on fire, maybe for a reason, they come up with such fakes, maybe really mobilization is going on there, as in a mirror. he does not shift this to russia, uh, here the documents themselves are interesting, how they are designed and with what spelling mistakes we admit it's true, yes. let's see how he looks like the head of the civil defense main directorate of the ministry of internal affairs to ensure the compilation of up to the first zero sixth twenty-second list in male citizens of the age from 16 to 65 years old, the exception of disabled people

of the first group, as well as female citizens of the age from 35 to 50, with the exception of a single mother and mother three or more children in order to form mobilization reserve. republics can be commented on. and the first specialists in the relevant documentation, in addition to grammar, of course, will sort it out in a few seconds. the second is all official documents. for a number of years, the ministry of defense of power structures has always been duplicated on the official websites of these organizations, respectively, even if you are a small specialist in military power documents , every citizen can check whether there is a corresponding document for the office, corresponding within literally one minute, here it is the website of the department. hmm, there is no such document here, but dmitry and i am very interested, but people from 65 years old. for example, in the red army they called up such u age u you know if