courage what else can i do? matvey petrovich matvey petrovich scold me, you fool. just let me, don’t destroy me, for the sake of christ i ask you, don’t destroy me and let me in, but i ask them to kill two petrovich . matvei petrovich, have mercy. well, i can still make karpatych, how can isak be taken from sticks by women? so you became the first belly. and how to put things in order so you can't catch a girl. our aunt, the only architecton, did not burn down. who are you going to punish now? now that everyone can set fire to and run away. st. petersburg, autumn 1714 i have. wow you golden. where? i have

mounds piled up. well done pleased will take the same fools. here in st. petersburg i have a swamp around matvey petrovich mounds, golden sashka gagarin told you on 27 in the morning two chests of denunciations against him in the senate. you envy gagarin what is he envious of with this gold before you atones for his sins . you banned stone construction , and gagarin meanwhile, they say the kremlin builds cleaner in tobolsk than in moscow

. let's go but something new will tell us about your favorite gagarin is good.

in the spring, it would go straight, it would become steeper, sharpen the shore, sing a stone kremlin here, how deadly the woman blew out. everything goes down. so we cancel the kremlin, yes, yes, it was a new direction to buy. yes, you satanil ulyanych, the kremlin to you with pillars, zababahai. now another river. turn what are you catching? i decided everything at the mouth of the tobol. there is a broken channel called tukhskaya, it is necessary to

dig wider in the boundary into the low water, and you learn to fill up the old one. yes, god will break through and fall three miles away from here there will be no more city with grind the kremlin.

and what about vladyka raskolnikov to you, they are east heretics semi-apostates, here the church condemned everyone in the episcopal casimat. maybe on the consecrated ground the evenings will repent. yes, such people reach us which of the glands, you see, the ear was cut off the tongue, they pulled out bowing with you and it must be commanded. war of the spirit why keep them like that? vladyka i, after all

, until my youthful years, until my youthful years, rested against massing, after all, we are the same as they did not find our court. he began to build his capital, where the city cannot be built at the cost of huge sacrifices, in swamps swamps under the blows of devastating floods, a city of amazing beauty will grow up, years will pass, and it will turn the life of the whole country upside down ; on the empty place. he loved manual labor.

forged, made anchors, paper life was bright as fireworks. but until the last day of his life, the emperor did not decide to whom to transfer his population to the 300th anniversary of peter i premiered on the day of russia at the first place, his beloved woman, whom he trusted more than anyone, betrayed him simply and pu. nich grilled meat for my close friends i serve mohei ketchup, i recommend how does he remember the name of dizzy to improve cerebral circulation, brain work, memory recovery and dizziness reduction on affect. now i will not

forget, the tourist route has been built , discover a new car for yourself. lee is the best way to be together. people are bored. premiere nakion is based on a real life history series amoremo, this is an easy love game a short moment of happiness when you love all the variety around everyone is happy you are well no obligations. you are with me a new

omore series, i can subscribe to the kion online cinema, get mts premium as a gift, available for subscribers of all operators, in order to benefit from communication, it is not necessary to share one tariff for all. connect up to six family members with your tariffs in the yota family constructor and get benefits up to 15% yota normal mobile operator care from pyaterochka discounts for you 2890. cinema 1tv cinema presents i can’t believe it. is this nightmare really over? what are we going to do now, we will work in the prosecutor's office or in the police, we will live svetka found the corpse of a woman according to the

laws of wartime. cinema 1tv presents melancholy to beat dad, i have to look for a glass on taganka, i go to the bank. i, too,

do not let anyone out. you know, we've been blocked. well, that's right, that just makes it even scarier. do you want to be infected too?

join kenline and try your luck having received guys up to 10,000 rubles. what free bet will you get? if again something win my something not something take the booty. i’ll lose you karpush 10 times more, just take the goods where gapon i have nowhere to hide my furs. i'm already a sinful thing, i think to quit stealing. it fails to come true. where did you go, tatar, where the governors went and came. i know what worthy merchants grieve, and the name of this sorrow is the prince. gagarin is right, i say, right. he took you away from the living room. the yard

does not allow customs to take out the sables. and i can't have them buy at a reasonable price. what are you talking about, son of a hajak, sell me what you yourself have long been tired of. how much less will you give than government clerks, but i'll keep a secret gagarin you have nothing? and how will you take it out, micha, i will send my caravan to the top and rewrite it. yes, kashgar to kashgar, he will come, my brother yusuf from bukhara, he will accept it pushes the dzhungars will not let caravan his degree, my brother yusuf, he is friends with the konteishi himself. with ivan raddan. well, who dares to plunder the convoy of a friend of the cantors. aren't you afraid that i'm talking about your secret thoughts? matvei petrovich will tell you. gagarin is a tiger, he is

a common enemy, that he can make former rivals comrades not a comrade, you do not trust us obliquely. we to you go look for profits in another place, but there is little wisdom. there you go and teach me kupchino , my filthy eyes here. let's get on the burden on time trails. there is no other way, apparently, i will give up a quarter. here is the thing.

go help

who is killed? we take his body with us. throw russian russians here in a snowdrift and bury them in snow, fly over traces both in the forest and on the road. turn your horses around. this wealth our they. good evening, the big game is on the air, the

russian special operation in the donbass is successfully developing, and much faster and more confidently than expected in kiev and washington, while russia again and again confirms its readiness for negotiations and a peace agreement with ukraine, this was stated today in particular by the speaker of the federation council valentina matvienko, but there is still no political will for this on the part of kiev, and the main reason from the point of view of russia is the policy of the united states, which continue to increase military assistance to ukraine and create in it the illusion precisely the illusion that by doing so it will be able to turn the tide of the military campaign in its favor vitya victory of russia in the donbass biden administration. i made a difficult decision for myself to start deliveries of multiple launch rocket systems to kiev. as stated by the range up to 80 km. they will be included in

a new package of military assistance to ukraine for 700 million. the fact that the president himself is biden does not just indicate that this decision was given to the white house. published an article in the new york times today which he explained this decision and tried to formulate the goal of the united states policy towards the ukrainian conflict. generally. indeed, in recent times, both in the united states and in europe , many have wondered, and what exactly this goal is and criticized, the previous statements of representatives of the biden administration that this goal is the maximum weakening and even the strategic defeat of russia was indicated by many experts and politicians that such a formulation of the issue is fraught with escalation conflict at the level, russia nato so in today's article, joe biden declares that he does not seek a direct clash with russia, does not seek to change its political regime and will not allow the united

states to be directly involved in a military conflict. here is a quote. from his article also today the secretary of state. eh, tony b. linkin said that in kiev they gave guarantees that these american rocket launchers would not be used for strikes on russian territory, but in russia itself they do not believe this promise and claim that any new arms deliveries, especially multiple launch rocket systems . fire increases the risk of escalation and the involvement of third countries in the conflict. well, that is, i mean the suppliers of these weapons. in general, the situation is very difficult and we will discuss this situation with the co-host of the big game, the president of the center for national interests in washington, dmitry simons. hello dmitry. dmitry mutually dmitry well, uh, president biden. uh, in this article, which i already quoted, i said that we do not want to prolong the war just to to hurt russia but from a russian point

of view. here. this decision on the supply of rzoo is inevitably aimed at leading to an escalation of the conflict inside ukraine in an attempt to prevent escalation outside of ukraine, but it will inevitably escalate inside ukraine, because in response to the supply of american missile defense systems. russia will increase the presence of its own rso a-a on in the combat zone and as a result, at least there will be an intensification of the war, the intensification of hostilities to a new level with and will die. even more people will be destroyed, and the infrastructure, and the radical change that washington seems to be counting on will not work, that is, there will be an intensification of the war without a radical change. do you agree with this, but dmitry i am not a military expert

. uh, as for washington. there are different points of view. uh, it will be possible to change the dynamics of hostilities, which are now develops in favor of russia, well, there is, the third, about which you just said, they proceed from the fact, what is the problem? and? yes, of course, it costs serious money, but on the other hand, you demonstrate moral and political unity. west yes in order for such a unity of the west nato e, there was a very important common enemy, and russia was made this enemy a. the money that is spent they largely go to military campaigns. and it's not so good for these companies. but this is

good for the administration, it helps to reduce energy unemployment, but proceeds from the fact that russian military equipment is destroyed, that, uh, they kill or injure, and russian military personnel, which is generally welcome, when there was a conflict, the war in afghanistan, you probably remember that there was a wild scandal in america, when russia was accused of being ready to allegedly pay the taliban some kind of reward in order to kill american servicemen, it seemed that way. it is now considered unacceptable and morally outrageous that since russia is an aggressor country from the point of view of the united states and american allies, then damaging russian military power, including by attacking

russian military personnel, is considered absolutely acceptable, even commendable. remember, surely you remember hillary clinton and how she sat in her uh office, uh in the white house she had a small office during the conflict in the region as a secretary during the conflict with porridge and when they destroyed they were torn to pieces. i can't even reproduce the sound of delight she made. and finally. let's be honest with ourselves yourself. ukraine is not a puppet, it is under the american strategic cap, the united states enjoys enormous influence in ukraine, but if the ukrainian government did not want to fight. now , if she told washington friends. we are not satisfied with the plan of military operations, which

involves the destruction of thousands of thousands of our military personnel, some military personnel. i wanted to say some casualties among civilians, the destruction of our infrastructure, if zelensky, instead of constantly demanding more and more weapons, - he said to me, help me achieve more peace, then i think that we reckoned with washington with such a desire, and they hear zelensky only hawkish calls and at the bark that it is given too slowly too little, and the country that the united states is preparing for the midterm elections, but for the biden after the catastrophic defeat in afghanistan well, it is important to prevent, firstly, the defeat in ukraine and he does not need to go to this election according to the document of the prosecution and zelensky or the republicans that he old wimp and dmitry i understand this logic. oh, but you understand the defeat of ukraine and therefore

the defeat of the united states, which supply ukraine with weapons, provide intelligence information, and so on, is inevitable, because those deliveries of rso that are announced. they really are not capable of fundamentally changing the balance of power. not even substantially able to change the balance of power that they are capable of. it will simply lead to much more destruction, indeed much more casualties among russian military personnel, ukrainian ones are much more mostly military personnel, because i think that for every unit of the american rso, russia will supply two or three units of the russian theater of military operations. yes, that is, e, this will simply lead to an increase in life, an increase in casualties among both the civilian population and the military. but what else, from the russian point of view, still causes very serious concern. it’s that yes, the united states declares its unwillingness to allow

escalation outside of ukraine, but will it work out here , uh, russia doesn’t really have an unequivocal answer, because those statements that were made today by high-ranking representatives of russia and foreign minister lavrov who said that this is a step towards spreading the conflict to third countries. that is, it is definitely out of bounds. e of ukraine and e. dmitry peskov, the presidential press secretary, says that firstly, and russia does not believe ukraine that it will not use these systems for strikes. on the very territory of russia and in russia, there are reasons not to trust ukraine for the past two months. minimum. she shells, uh, the border regions from the weapons that it has, and secondly, the degree of involvement of the united states in this conflict is already. indeed, very deep. i'll give you one example today, dmitry, and in

tallinn, estonia, the head of the cyber ​​command of the united states armed forces did something very disturbing full blown. in my view statement he stated that we had a quote. yes, we have conducted a series of operations across the spectrum including offensive defensive and information operations. yes this he said in relation to the ukrainian conflict. you know very well, dmitry, that the united states was the first under the obama administration to officially proclaim the cybersphere as a theater of war, just like the land and air of the sea. yes, the cybersphere is also a theater of war. if the united states pentagon spokesman says they are conducting offensive cyber operations. meaning against russia he meant that produce is conducting test drills or he

openly admitted that he is conducting operations already conducts operations against russia well, i gave the quote that we have we conducted a series of operations across the spectrum including offensive defensive and information operations. if we are really talking not about training, but about real operations, then this is simply the physical involvement of the united states in the conflict. yes, and we have a very shaky line between the invisible line between cyber operations and kinetic ones, i wo n’t comment on this, because i don’t understand this, but the peculiarity of such operations is that they usually should be top secret, that's the whole expediency of it. if these are not just publications, the whole expediency of this is to do something to the enemy so that the enemy does not really know about it. and as usual, we

learn about this kind of thing not from those who carry out these operations. and those who are subject to these operations and these operations are struggling. a lot of things are said here in general, and for me, as a person who heads an american magazine. i often find it hard to figure this out. well, here for example, for many years i took very seriously what the leading intelligence officers said. bodies of the west i proceeded from the fact that, of course, they are, to put it mildly, not friendly to russia, that they carry out the tasks of their governments, but in general, i proceeded from the fact that consciously publicly, they do not hang noodles on their ears. and that if they do n’t want to say something, then they won’t raise this topic. uh, i have a colleague who held a very high position, and in the cia in the eighties he

headed the cia accident station. that is, this is the station that dealt with afghanistan, and now he came to washington, he wrote this in his book, which was, among other things, from novorossia, the main opponent. uh, he was told that there are children's toys over there, uh, the russians are scattering, which are not children's toys, but in fact mines, they are disguised as toys that kill children. he went. this checked seemed to be a complete pmc, that is, one could say that these mines looked like toys on the idea that they were consciously. here the children were thrown ridiculously, and he not only he did not repeat this version himself, but he also actively told the cia leadership that such things should not be said. now i watch every day almost every day, and bill burns is the head director of the cia and the former went to moscow so far. at least, as far as i know, such things are not involved, but our english.

if possible, so to speak friends. they now give daily briefings, which are frankly frank nonsense in order to conduct psychological warfare. well, intelligence agencies. do you mean uk intelligence hedgehogs morning briefings. that's right, but you know, there's always been psychological warfare. well, here 's some kind of psychological warfare and the supply of intelligence data. these were two different things. now the difference is completely erased, so i don’t know what i had in mind, but the general is in a kosoni. he spoke some time ago. we are in the center. ah sounded absolutely normal weighted and warned us. he spoke about the danger of russian cyberpiracy and said that russia

should not be provoked in this area, because russia is big opportunities. it was very strange to me, and insulting to hear. if now they would provoke russia in this way. here's the full quote. uh, the general on the cassone. he's just talking about containment. yes, he says that he is afraid of the russians, kirov atak, so we are pre-hunting, but here we are dealing with a very thin line again, and an excess of the line between containment and provocation, because when you pursue a policy oriented towards you undertake, especially in the cyber sphere, where in general can not understand anything. and you are taking actions that the other side may already perceive as an act of aggression, and they question the quote. i question. why are these quotes given? well, uh, you know that the united states and russia are smaller than spies. that's right, of course, but imagine you have a very valuable spy in their house. and so you go out, tell our

spies, whoever, and as part of our offensive operations, you have achieved brilliant results. well, can you imagine that? not? if and if someone said this, then, most likely, the other side would not believe it and thought that they were deliberately setting it up, but i don’t want to in any case. in this case, blame the united states for being already de facto at war with russia. i just want to emphasize one point that we need a serious strategic dialogue, including a mechanism for conflict over cybersecurity issues and it was a mistake to interrupt that cyber dialogue that took place between washington and moscow last year after the summit in geneva, because the situation is extremely unsteady and difficult and to cross this very line, which is actually invisible. it is very simple and it is also possible to interpret the words that are declared in completely different ways, of

course. even now, i uh absolutely uh, am aware that we are cyber-pirating against each other. look. how many cyber operations have been carried out against the russian media and others. uh, so to speak, russian objects in the information sphere. yes but here it is necessary to clearly have the rules of the game clear rules of the game. here is what is possible, what is impossible in the cyber sphere, otherwise you know the game without rules. and it's very dangerous. and this is very dangerous, but er, even more dangerous is another dangerous one, primarily for the united states itself. and we, it seems to me, that we in america have completely lost our strategic orientation. i'm not talking about moral guidelines. i'm not talking about fairness. i'm not talking international law. i will speak, i am talking about and the ability to determine the main interests of my

countries and set priorities. from my point of view, the greatest american president, the first president of the united states, george washington, in his farewell speech as president, spoke about the danger of constant alliances that drive you into some situations and actions just because you made an obligation to some country. or maybe your interests are not there at all. and he especially warned against any country, especially in europe. they say he loves it like that. that you just don't have a perspective anymore everyone who refuses to fully support this country and is just starting to accuse traitors, but in fact traitors to american interests. those who have forgotten that they are american politicians, they represent the interests of some other country, like ukraine, and that's

why the united states should support ukraine to such an extent from my point of view, if you use a strategic criterion, it is not clear, as for the argument from the president about democracy. i will say a shocking thing for america and maybe for many in russia i apologize in advance democracy, not the most important thing in life, democracy is a means. this is not the goal. democracy is a way to give people freedom and leaders to make the right decisions, but democracy itself, as an end in itself, is not the most important thing - this is the bolshevik position that the end justifies the means. here we will proclaim some great goal and will continue to do everything that comes to our mind like this. for me, not the most important democracy, but how soon we are talking about the

need to support ukraine because it democratic country. professor suslov tell me by what criteria is ukraine a democratic country? you don’t know such criteria, and on the contrary, i know the criteria that in ukraine opposition parties are banned and persecuted, uh, those politicians who express a point of view objectionable to the current regime in ukraine , and in ukraine, again, the media are closed and persecuted, uh , which express a different point of view than the one that you want, but on the banking street in kiev, uh, and much other. that is, in my opinion, ukraine, i am already taking out of brackets the fact that this is an overly corrupt country, but such a corrupt country. a priori cannot be a model of democracy. they have two leading candidates

for the post of president in the last elections, the number of references and both are on trial. both poroshenko and medvedchuk are telling you something about dmitry, but they don’t really surprise me. in this case, double standards. um, i remember how else, if my memory serves me in the year 2007, and condoleezza rice being then secretary of state the united states called kazakhstan a model and hope for democracy in central asia, yes. that is, indeed, here rather, american geopolitical interests determine the criteria of value back, and we were told about very promising democratic changes in belarus, and when lukashenko occupied a special position in people's affairs, moving away from moscow, then lukashenko unexpectedly turned out to be a democrat, of course, when he moved away from moscow he immediately became a handshake democrat.

yes, we remember it all very well, and just as the united states did improve relations with muammar gaddafi after 2003. this year, when he began to act in favor of american interests, but it didn’t help him, yes, and you talked about this today, but i completely agree. dmitry with your thesis about the blurring, i would say, the universalization of american national interests of emotionality, you know? i do not see a clear criterion. why ukraine should be so important to the united states i don't see the strategic arguments, i don't see the moral arguments, but from a legal point of view. uh, ukraine is not an ally, and you know when ukraine starts to play victims of aggression, but i want to say, just, well, a simple thing. it 's more difficult, because if you remember the history of

relations between ukraine and russia. the current regime came to power, how they behaved in the donbass, then in general, after that they say that the russian attack was not provoked. and it's pretty difficult. you can tell that she contradicts like someone interprets international law international law. this is the law like a drawbar, where will you turn? i came out here, but to say that this is unprovoked, but that's how the united states attacked saddam hussein and then finished him off. who, like them, no one says that it was, according to the people's laws, but they said, he created weapons of mass destruction, as if supposedly, but they said that he created, and then i later turned out to be supposedly, but i say this to the fact that no one says that it was unprovoked

american aggression, they say, a mistake happened exaggerated something. well, that's to say that it's not provoked. in general, it seems to me that this whole situation, but the erection in ukraine on some combination of the throne of ishat in america. this speaks badly of the common sense of the american foreign political leader dmitry, i completely agree with you and believe that the united states had every chance to prevent the start of a russian special operation in ukraine, but because the united states supplied ukraine with weapons. moreover, it is now officially stated how much of this weaponry was supplied before the start of the special operation, at least since august last year. secondly, it was the united states that did not want to remove the issue of ukraine's accession to nato from the agenda and, on the contrary, officially emphasized that they

fully support this, and it was even spelled out in that charter, if my memory serves me, or strategic partnership, or some kind of enhanced strategic partnership that ukraine and the united states, uh, signed in november e of last year, and then it was the united states that rejected the justified demands for security guarantees that russia formulated at the end of last year, that is, the united states, they claim that they allegedly knew that russia was preparing, e, a special operation was preparing for the military actions, but the united states deliberately did not. in order to prevent this special operation and, on the contrary, they did exactly everything to make this special operation inevitable, yes, and this is really the responsibility of the united states but returning to the limits of american interests. here, but it still seems to me that, and not completely. uh, joe biden is ready to support ukraine

well, firstly, he deliberately allows and creates the prerequisites for the murder, and this is not the goal for the death of a large number of ukraine, but he is ready to endure this for a certain moment and it seems like he does not have a headache or heartache, so about it, but i'm sure that's consciously, he does not achieve this, of course, but my attention was attracted. how exactly is biden in his article in the new york times, articulated the goal of american policy towards ukraine listen the goal of the united states is simple we want to see a democratic and independent sovereign and prosperous ukraine able to defend itself against further aggression my principles during this crisis was not to make a decision about ukraine without the participation of ukraine itself i i will not put any pressure on the ukrainian government, either publicly or privately, to persuade it

to make territorial concessions, the united states will continue to work to strengthen ukraine and support its efforts to achieve a negotiated end to the conflict. here, in my opinion dmitry, this statement is very equivalent, because on the one hand. he says, maidan says that he will not put pressure on kiev so that kiev makes territorial concessions. but on the other hand, from this article i did not see a single statement that the territorial integrity of ukraine within the borders of 2014 is important for the united states. or even february 24th. that is, i conclude. what? if somehow kyiv itself agree on territorial concessions, the united states will not interfere. i understand correctly. you get it right, and you, uh , i'm sure you get one more thing right, because you've talked about it before. namely, that the united states could most likely have avoided this conflict if it had said clearly in

response to russian demands last december that the united states does not see ukraine in nato in the near future and is ready to work on an appropriate document that would introduced some guarantees and these guarantees would include not only formal membership in nato, but would also exclude large military maneuvers and the creation of american bases on the territory of ukraine. i understand correctly that in this case there was most likely no war in the special operation. i would not, most likely, it would not exist 100%. biden's great victory he managed to unite the so-called western world against russia in order to deal with the consequences of this american strategic mistake. everyone already admits that the dispute can go about some territorial concessions in this or that country, but

no one says that ukraine will now be in nato, no one says that there will be american bases. so what did the united states achieve for their country inflation, and a record drop in the level of biden himself in political support and from demonstrating that the influence of the united states outside the collective west is extremely limited dmitry thank you so much for this conversation, as always it was very interesting and see you again . dmitry mutually. thank you great game will be back in this one studio a few moments later. a case

similar to our confrontation of the entire series on sunday on the first fell, this person i tuned in to him. ozone deliver with love today up to 30% discount on car care products grass midea compact dishwasher with 35% discount. i just want to renew cmtpl at a normal price for a whole week. compare compare insurance offer see reviews and ratings and buy osago can be compared checked by one and a half million and one more motorist. welcome to the ozone summer discount marathon for

a whole week of discounts. shop easily every day new items with discounts right now on ozon discounts from 30% on men's and women's sneakers. puma and active foam for cleaning salton sneakers with a 50% discount. care in pyaterochka discounts for you juices gardens will come 790. incredible stories everyone keep secrecy based on a real miracle for three days we did not find a single living person. discover this summer with new stylish looks. choose casual clothes and shoes from adidas on wildberries tinkoff black card until june 30 and get free service forever

tinkoff he is the only one ozone we deliver with love today discounts from 30 percent, mountain bike, rashavr and accesstyle wireless headphones for 1390 rubles, if you are a creative ambitious young professional, then rather accept participation in the national open championship of creative competencies. a big game is on the air namely, tanker oil, but there has been a further

increase in world prices long and large-scale than the energy crises of the seventies and eighties, and this, of course, leads to even greater inflation, while in the countries of the european union it is very significant that the highest inflation is precisely in those european countries that were the first to abandon russian energy carriers. these are poland and the baltic countries. but nevertheless, nevertheless, europe continues to take even new steps. which further increase oil prices today, the financial times, wrote that the european union and the uk allegedly agreed to ban the insurance of those ships that transfer russian oil, that is, insurance, but in a tank. and this, in my opinion, is a very strange decision. well, first of all, because, uh, the sanctions of the european

the union does not apply, for example, to greece yes, greece can still provide its tanker fleet for transportation to russian oil, e. to countries in asian countries, sudden countries, yes, and the volume of supplies of russian oil to a sudden country, especially in china and india, continues sergey sergeevich v what is the logic behind these decisions of the european union and great britain ? certification ban on insurance now, but in one of the versions in the full version. that's what his package was attended by just insurance and a ban on the use of any fleet in order to transport russian oil and even a in part of third countries, not only european ones. uh, the fleet had to use it, but until it all came in,

so the task is to make life as difficult as possible so that tankers that do not go to the eu go further towards other consumers towards asia towards the south, but insurance, again, this issue has already been covered in history. well , iran will already remember being under sanctions. it continues to supply oil, without insurance from europeans or americans, as it was implemented, such a company exists not only in the european union. you know the most interesting thing is that japanese insurance companies insure oil because they buy it. they agreed to insure, otherwise. and, of course, the japanese will also dream of sanctions if they are introduced, but since now our buyers are mostly not japanese. and this is south- well, china directly india then, in general, these companies are capable, if they are given the right tip, how to insure these goods. now, by the way, our internal insurance companies are also engaged in insurance, their certificates are accepted

by the indians, for example, and, in general, the goods come with insurance. so this is resolved. yes , of course it is more difficult, but it is also solved. i think, to be honest, that the europeans just once again shot themselves in the foot, because they impose extra territorial sanctions. how are they made the united states, yes, that is, sanctions that would limit not only their own actions, but also the actions of a country of third third countries, the europeans cannot, and jose barrel said that, well, the european union cannot impose secondary sanctions against india against china yes, the main importers. and oil is crazy madness yes, the americans, so do not try to imitate. but uh, they limit themselves. well, ok, we will use other e insurers, yes, but this will in no way limit the supply of russian oil. uh, non-western countries. this will simply limit the consumption of oil in the european union itself, with all the ensuing consequences, through sanctions. they

proceed from this, that look at each new round of sanctions - this is an increase in pressure on consumers of the european union with a large economic just , uh, negative, and the potential is for the eu and less for russia, so every time this proportion is moving in this direction . and here i was wondering, but before the end of the year, the europeans will lose for the additional cost of energy. well, somewhere around half a trillion dollars they will overpay, because oil has risen in price by one and a half times, at least gas. ah, relative to the average european price three times higher than usual. that's it. uh, the europeans pay. in general, they do n’t even pay russia, but other countries that supply resources to norway, too, for example, which earn huge profits, and the middle east is simply bathed in american dollars to do with them. not just nowhere has this ever happened, so wonderful. here are the europeans

help to earn the whole commodity world. although the message was exactly the opposite, while e decreases, the intensity of the volume of trade and economic relations between russia and western countries from the united states, which have long introduced an oil embargo from the european union, where russia, of course, will represent less, and oil, but only e at the end from the end this year, but the volume of trade and economic relations with non-western countries is increasing. a and. but. not western nor western world, he is actually ready. uh, to i would say the strengthening of the economic integration. e with russia a very revealing result of a public opinion poll was published today. ah, he was brought in by the german sociological institute, uh, latana, and uh, european ngo alliance