and who made me like this? maybe remind why did i start drinking? end of innocence? what where when the summer series of games final on june 13 on the first join thousands of rubles, and what kind of freebie will you get?

for 5 years in a schism i denied the priesthood. and she lived in fornication. he was his name you don't have to name god . i killed a man.

i wanted from myself with my own hands. death in the fire to betray in the hands of the devil were you a miracle that you were not torn apart? does your soul break down and your sins? i dont know. lord it's bitter for me to tell you about this son, but as a wife it shouldn't be yours. monasteries infuriates the soul on a thread.

hello, carp. come in, sit down and why did you not fall into the governor's mercy, health, began to weaken, i am correcting more than the governor stole, lord have mercy. you yourself checked all the offices , everything came together to the last penny. yes, this is the most suspicious. well, it can't be that everything fits together so smoothly. well trust me. maybe repent? we are all stealing, your governor is stealing. well repent repent may your death. you will die without shame but i will say the mountain i served. are you gagarin a thief? i

already know you will, well, that's it, i'll tell you. well, that's good, well done bibika well done. oh, i ’m on your breath. now we’ll finish, i’ll grab the whole cup and roll it out. all of you thieves, every single one. hmm , i will bring to light not wealth, but satanic pride. what do you have alone? gagarina come on, tell me.

i love him so much that i would run after him barefoot in the snow. i understand. petka of my dzhungar brother was killed. i roared over him for a whole week. it's a pity for him, but vanya herself thinks. so he left, and i did nothing to him said. are you loving?

no, no, i'm not cold, everything is fine. you know if you need me, i'm there, right? your husband are very happy together, but he is changing and now he is a very, very good person. i tell you

a secret i also ride my love. how is the husband? well, it happens that there is a husband, and you love other men. is it possible? one must be where to love, otherwise the heart will die. good help. give me money. i'll bring it. oh

, you'll meet. i'll bring it. come tomorrow at midnight at the house of my master kasym, i will meet you. thank you ran together senya i can't. how i am without a father without tobolsk

only sick battalions you have, 37 mortuary that 's right. good evening on the air

, the united states plays a huge role in the current conflict in ukraine, its policy towards ukraine for many years, the desire to use it as a springboard against russia, and the rejection of those proposals for security guarantees that russia put forward at the end of last year made this conflict will inevitably supply arms and intelligence information to kiev as well as the use of kyiv as the proxy against russia affects the duration of this conflict and kiev's refusal to negotiate a peace settlement. today, many russian observers and even officials characterize the current policy of the united states towards russia as a hybrid war with the aim of inflicting a strategic defeat on our country and removing it from the leading countries of the world with the tools of this hybrid war. in addition to prolonging the conflict in ukraine, there are also unilateral sanctions. and trade restrictions and information warfare and

cyber ops and pressure on russia-friendly countries to turn their backs on russia and rally around the united states is a very recent example serbia what are the prospects for this hybrid warfare? how will russian-american relations develop in the future, if the prospects for their normalization are about this and many other things? me and dmitry syme, president of the center for national interests in washington, co-host of the big game. today we will talk with the russian ambassador to the united states of america, anatoly ivanovich antonov anatoly ivanovich good afternoon it is a great honor and pleasure for us to see you today in our program hello dmitry. the word sir went big to you. thanks for taking the time. i'll take the bull by the horns if i may, so to speak. how would you characterize the current state of russian-american relations and

the position of the biden administration in relation to russia. i ask, especially because in the 10 days that i spent in moscow, i arrived. as you know from washington 10 days ago. in general, it was like i think there is a certain change of mood in moscow among those who follow international relations. at first there was a very big pessimism. at first, there was a feeling that, in general, the united states was insisting on the complete surrender of russia, and the last articles of president biden were statements by other officials. uh, some articles in the new york times. washington post, well, in general, they created the feeling that maybe there is no other policy yet, but it seems that a different tone is emerging, they are already talking about the need to negotiate with russia. uh, what, uh, no one is demanding regime change in russia what? uh. in general, uh, ukraine must

hold back from using new weapons against russian territory. not a lot, to be honest, but it kind of sounds like it represents a trend, or is there some other point that you think is more central. good evening colleagues thank you very much for the invitation. uh, i am addressing you first of all, dmitry, although, today, a lucky chance for me, i am between two dmitrys. necessary think of something good and be sure to washington it will happen. so dmitry i hope this is not our last meeting on the federal channel. i don’t know, however, how you will decide what will happen after a few days of a ban on cooperation for american legal entities and individuals, but i believe that you will find a wise decision and we will continue discussions with you. ah,

live. you have set very voluminous and key questions. uh, the issues of the current uh problems in russian american relations are deeply rooted. our special military operation exposed all the contradictions that washington used to sometimes try to gloss over. you know dmitry, i didn't get the impression that the united states would not abandon the task. uh, defeats scattered in ukraine are ready to discuss the conditions for resolving, i see only today the desire to further aggravate the problems to make it more painful for us to supply weapons to the irresponsible kiev government, weapons that will bring death to ordinary ukrainians and russians weapons that do not bring peace, but only contribute to the continuation of the conflict the trend you're talking about

asked one to weaken russia to inflict economic political yes and public defeat. to prevent russia from standing firmly on its feet and playing a key role in solving world problems, the role that the charter of the united nations defines as a founding state of the world organization, a permanent member of the security council, today dmitry has said a lot about the impact of anti-russian economic sanctions on the economy of the western world . and the usa yesterday e you read, of course, canoe john biden joe biden state of emergency due to the threat of power shortages in the united states of america to any sane person. today it is obvious that the sanctions are pulling americans to the abyss of prices at gas stations, literal sensations. such is that

the administration is shooting itself in the foot with sanctions at the same time. he dances this pleasure. in my opinion. this is some kind of masochism, and ahead of the midterm elections to congress and at stake is control over the houses of congress, i will be extremely careful and restrained in this part, so that no one accuses me of meddling in the internal affairs of the united states of america after all. and this is the life of americans and the united states will accept. i am sure a wise decision that should improve the economic condition of the country. however, repeating on every corner that russia is to blame for everything is either a misunderstanding of the situation, or a special company by mail from an external enemy that could be accused of all mortal sins. uh, i won’t, uh, speak more

vladimir vladimirovich putin clearly. uh, told us all about the situation at the energy markets and quite literally. therefore, i spoke back on my fingers what food security entails. you know, uh, mr. ambassador. that's what you said, i think it's all true. many in moscow see some new positive. i don't even want to say signs of signs, do you see these signs or do people accept what they really want or maybe even the administration wants to create some kind of false impression. here's how to explain this gap between what you see and what you see a number of moscow observers. and dmitry, of course, a strange situation, you, being in moscow, send me a positive signal and

a possible change. uh, the relationship of the current administration to us alas, alas. and, alas. i don't see this here, uh, just like all my colleagues , the russian-american dialogue is at an unprecedented low. e mark trust is undermined. collaboration collapses, even on problems representing urine. mutual interest can be seen, communication between the parties today is limited and largely reduced only to discuss the technical problems of interaction by properties. and i, as one of the employees on property with the us executive authorities on the american initiative, was practically frozen by the state departments , prefers to contact only by phone or via e-mail correspondence. rare conversations with representatives of the white house i will say very carefully, while episodic telephone

conversations between defense ministers and chiefs of general staffs remain. i believe this is extremely important to prevent a direct military confrontation . fraught, and escalating with the unpredictable. uh, with the consequences, anatoly ivanovich, you have painted a very important and at the same time depressing picture, because on the one hand the biden administration. as you say, it continues the policy aimed at weakening russia, and we really record the continuation of this policy on the other side. biden administration. she says that she does not want to allow the third world war, but seeks to avoid a direct military clash with russia, in other words, she is interested in controlled confrontation. but for a controlled confrontation, a full-fledged dialogue is necessary first of all. let there be dialogue between countries that perceive each other as adversaries, but from what you said now it follows

that there is, in fact, no such dialogue and the russian point of view in the white house, and even more so on the capitalist hill, but to hear do not want. this is really very dangerous, because it threatens, and the loss of control for this conflict, but i want to ask you about a separate aspect that was always one of the pillars of russian american relations. this is strategic stability. still, regardless of the ukrainian conflict , russia and the united states remain and will remain nuclear superpowers, and in the twenty-sixth year, the agreements with nv3 expire. and after the geneva summit, russia and the united states began a dialogue on strategic stability. now it is interrupted, as we know, due to american fault. what are the prospects, is it underway ? some conversations, at least consultations on this topic and how do you assess the prospects for a dialogue on

issues of strategic stability. strategic stability - this is the key problem has always been in the soviet american and russian american relations to ignore the russian. uh, nuclear capability is simply not possible, and also, as some have suggested, just abolish it. i do not understand at all what this phrase is, and any attempts to ignore. uh, the current state of affairs is a strategic balance, between our countries it will be deplorable for the whole world. this is understood by many here, yes, we have extended, uh, contracts with me and i am very happy, like anyone russian. moreover, i was lucky to work a little on e together with my colleagues from other departments from the creation of this document. this is the only depth that exists today. yes, the hope has begun to boil that after the geneva summit we will start, and concrete, serious substantive conversations.

however, even here. elementary interaction that has begun several rounds of consultations have passed, all this is a victim of anti-russian hysteria, and on february 25, at the initiative of washington , the dialogue, as we call it, is frozen frozen indefinitely. we were told that control of expression was not a priority for the administration in the face of russia's special military operations. ridiculous accusations of our country of saber-rattling nuclear weapons have begun, the words of our president, the minister of foreign affairs, are twitching. we are accused here of starting to engage in nuclear blackmail. but recently, dmitry simes interviewed sergey viktorovich lavrov, who gave an explanation about the danger of a nuclear conflict between our two countries. you know, there

was hysteria in the american media. as they tried to distort the words of the russian minister, we were forced to give, uh, an additional explanation so that the situation would calm down a little, i was repeatedly repeated and told by friends, read the russian military doctrine and the basis of inflammation. everything is written there, those conditions are indicated under which the use of nuclear weapons is possible. we are constantly emphasizing. we don't threaten anyone. we only warn of the dangerous consequences of interference. western situation in ukraine continued pumping her weapons. now. if you allow me, i will say a lot more speculation about long-range systems, which the kiev decisions are so eager for, but no western systems will change the state of affairs, but on earth.

i am sure that our armed forces will be even further away. to drop the national battalion from the line of contact, and so today there is no dialogue between russia and the united states on strategic security issues , this is a wrong situation. we are two as a permanent member of the security council, we have a special responsibility for international peace and the security of the world expects concrete action from us. and you are right. there is very little time left and, uh , the validity of the cis treaty, uh, will just fly by instantly and we will have uh nothing with them. and we, i want to emphasize on the russian side, are ready for a serious professional conversation with the americans on this topic. this is in our interest. i'm sure it's in the interest of the united states of america and

the international community, but it's very important that we run after the americans. we will not. this is work. we need it to the same high degree as the americans and the americans. excuse me, anatoly ivanovich, if i may. a small clarifying question in pursuit of and in the development of strategic stability. here is another dialogue that the united states had for russia following the geneva summit was a dialogue on cybersecurity issues. and it is also interrupted, but by the united states. at the same time, we are hearing certain alarming signals. here's a full-time general, head of uh, cyber ​​command the us military has said that they are conducting offensive cyberpilots against russia, which is quite disturbing. that's in the field of cybersecurity. do you see any prospects for the resumption of the russian american dialogue, or everything is also dull. indeed, after the summit, and it was very good, the two sides began closed

consultations through the kremlin and the security council as well. uh, united states security councils . several rounds passed. uh, consultations. hey, let me tell you a little secret. i think, that colleagues will not be offended by me, there were first signs that we can achieve concrete results. however, again. everything now was like everything was back during the cold war, it's all to blame. russia is everywhere russia is attacked russia must be contained. and it is better to disarm it, so today. if you didn't ask me this question. i see no prospects for the restoration of such a necessary useful mutually beneficial dialogue between the united states of america and russia. mr. ambassador, i will ask you tactless question on tried. of course, we can discuss what we know. and so you always want

to believe in the best, and when you hear that there is no dialogue , hope that there is some kind of confidential dialogue, but as, for example, it was during the caribbean crisis. as you know, there was dialogue at several different levels in uh, 1983, it was a very difficult situation. after the soviet er, the armed forces, in my opinion, a fighter shot down an american er, korean plane. sorry, and andropov in general, he took it, but the american reaction as evidence of the threat that the united states would almost inflict a preventive nuclear strike on the soviet union well, even then, some soviet officials in washington dobrynin's embassy, ​​of course, the ambassador were other very

competent people. they had contacts, significant contacts with the american country, they came, to live out these difficult days, let's say a person like arbatov, and there they also showed him all kinds of films, but he performed in different places, and officials came. i know that he had confidential meetings. that's not revealing secrets. could you say, is there any informal dialogue that has been complementary to the vacuum that has been created in the official dialogue. well, how can i answer your questions? i reveal secrets. if you were such a dialogue, this would be the mystery would be revealed, and i would not like to go into the essence of possible potential confidential contacts, i will say so that our uh, viewers,

listeners do not say my words, but i don’t know attack contacts uh. and you don't participate in them? of course, dmitry is the only one i don’t know about these contacts, which means i don’t participate in them. i just wanted clarification because this is a question. as you can guess, very serious and important. but then i don't understand, here the united states is sending all these signals. uh, as to how it won't be used, let's say these multiple rocket launchers , do you mean to say auto russia learns about these american positions through public statements without having any discussion with russian diplomats. russia is a great country and russia has a huge number of opportunities, thanks to which russia recognizes this or that,

er, the result of the foreign policy of the united states of america as far as we are concerned. we are embassies. i mean , we spoke unambiguously on behalf of moscow. as for my harsh rejection of the policy of the united states of america, the pumping up of the zelensky regime of weapons, and we are talking not only about long-range systems, but weapons in general, i will add one more point, which i can’t understand why there is little discussion of our means media on television talking about smc, i remember the good times when russia and the united states of america worked together to prevent both. the spread of manpads in the world, we even exchanged data to wear an account, who

put how much? but today you saw footage, and not russian television, but kiev e-television , of how these systems are distributed, uh, for anyone who wants, we saw footage of the military chronicle, how the russian armed forces seize entire warehouses for sam, i ask myself a question. is it really here and understand all the pastas. with such a policy, it is impossible to create an island of prosperity, being in washington, new york, san francisco, because all this will boomerang back to the united states of america, the world has not yet calmed down with their er, billions of er savings. uh, the weapons in afghanistan are hers. in my opinion. here is the spread of manpads around europe around the world can bring. the most negative consequences for e world, i would like to speak about this in particular today.

and as for long-range systems, the president, uh, 2 days ago, it was clearly clear, he said we are talking about about what missiles the americans will supply to them , if the americans decide to supply long-range missiles, then i want to say that i do n’t even doubt that the russian side will take adequate steps that will allow us to protect our territory from a possible possible attack. we will continue our conversation with anatoly ivanovich antonov in a few moments. the philosophy of international american politics in this region is that it is necessary in no case to allow the rapprochement of ukraine with russia that's because someone sees some kind of threat in this film by oliver stone today on first, in

fact. this is another major gross strategic mistake of our partners, because there is an adequate response to all these actions. incredible story for everyone to keep a secret

based on a real miracle in three days we have not found a single living person in the cinema since june 9th. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices from sovcombank loans, make important purchases at today's prices and turn on the joy back close plans. big events a loan from sovcombank people are more important let me treat you to a mix from tele2 50 gb of movie music adds and a discount on smart devices we supplement the ideal ingredients in one subscription already in time plast at a bargain price, and the first connection is free.

factories crispy vampire delicate devissy chocolate bar, no sun, sugar tube from a clean line, the perfect combination of waffles, ice cream and chocolate, pure line, please your and loved ones taste buds. up to 50% of cases, m.video in citylink is beneficial for you discounts up to 40%. buy the goods you need profitably, for example, a hutor with a discount of 2,600 rubles. only in citylink dolls' joints are the weakest point, and i don't have the latest complex of native collagen

type 2 to maintain freedom of movement portneo strength of native collagen for joints people are bored. based on a true story, the amore mo series is a light moment of happiness when you love all the variety around everyone is happy for you . no obligation to the kion online cinema, get mts premium as a gift available for subscribers of all operators summer discounts and convenient delivery from june 7th to 8th. buy in the yandex.market app a boxbok trampoline with a 25% discount, apply for a tinkoff black card on june 30 and receive it free of charge and service forever.

vibrosal, an anesthetic ointment with natural ingredients, helps to gently cope with pain and inflammation day after day. find your way to freedom of movement vibrating the wise choice against pain. there is a big game on the air and we continue, uh, a conversation with our dear guest today, the ambassador russian federation in the united states by anatoly ivanch antonov anatoly ivanovich here. i want to return to the question that dmitry asked and what we talked about, namely, the dialogue between russia and the united states. after all, of course, the embassy plays a critical role in this dialogue, and it is no coincidence that dmitry simes. mentioned the experience of the caribbean crisis in

preventing the apocalypse then a critical role. e, played by the then ambassador of the soviet union to the united states, anatoly dobrynin , who met with john f. kennedy's brother robert and it was at this meeting that they agreed on how to resolve it. uh, the cuban missile crisis, but now it's the diplomatic embassies. a solution is between the united states and russia. it seems to me that the expulsions of diplomats continue at an unprecedented low level. and yesterday, your colleague, and the united states ambassador to russia, john sullivan, in his interview with tass said that he did not even rule out the scenario of closing the embassy. well, this is generally, it seems to me, an absolutely unacceptable scenario, and this did not happen at the worst moments. the cold war in the worst of the first berlin crisis, the second berlin korean caribbean never

faced the issue of closing the embassy. now, do you share a-a pessimism. uh, john sallion and do you see any prospects for normalization. well, at least diplomatic relations between our countries. the task of normalizing diplomatic relations between our two countries is, of course, one of the key ones and rightly done today by all the center what colleague john sullivan said yesterday closing embassies. uh, of course, never say never, but the current situation. and what i hear from the white house from the state department. still, it indicates that the remnants of reason remained there and that today the american side did not thus become a question, but about the closure of e diplomatic missions. on the contrary, it

seemed to me that there were signals that the functioning of the russian embassy in washington of our two consulates e in new york and in houston, they are essential as well as activities. eh american. diplomatic representative offices in moscow and i have today, despite all the conclusions that i have drawn today, despite the maxims that i will send you today, i do not have the feeling that the americans are aiming to close our diplomatic representations - representations, with regard to the restoration of diplomatic relations. this is an extremely serious problem. the thing is, there's certainly a crisis of confidence between us, as long as the hawk-wings are leading the administration up, but in

at the same time, i want to tell you that there are people who, uh, including those in the white house, who believe that the dialogue should be continued. including, taking into account factor a of strategic stability and maintaining e global security, which concerns us and russian diplomats who work here on the territory of the united states of america, including through us. uh, in new york, we firmly believe that common sense. well, you just have to ah-ah oriental. we are two great powers, we are doomed to interaction. and another moment just passed may 9th celebration, but we cannot forget who the militant brotherhood that existed between the soviet union and the americans. and together we tried to crush this nazi plague, and there are very

few veterans left. and we are glad to welcome them here on the territory of the property. e, we are very pleased to receive congratulations from them, and we sent these congratulations to them, they don’t remember, and they have a big question in their eyes about what is happening and they also help us, aiming at continuing contacts and at restoration of cooperation mr. went, but it's great, of course, that the american veterans. eh, they remember. uh, their fighting brotherhood, to welcome them to the russian embassy, ​​but more widely. here is how the embassy works. i mean, the inner work didn't come in. and in what atmosphere? in what relationship with the outside world, and i told you, i will reveal the secret of ours. uh, conversations with you are not very secret. and he said that when i went, uh, about a month ago to moscow in

the administration. i was told that there is a serious concerns about how the american embassy is treated in russia and under what difficult conditions and in what reduced staff the american embassy has to work tell us about the russian embassy in washington how are your relations with the outside world? we just work. we are doing everything possible to protect national interests from this side and maintain contacts with the united states of america through the protection of national interests. because when i speak on this subject, before my eyes the faces of our young guys, soldier officers who are fighting today, uh, as part of a special military operation. there is, of course, no comparison here. and uh, it's hardly worth showing crocodile tears here. we are working

we will do our best to protect the national interest. yes russophobia. it 's huge here. just yesterday, i was leaving the territory of the embassy, ​​there are people, uh, with uh, ukrainian flags, who shout, uh, that we are so and so, but how they see that the car of a russian diplomat is leaving. immediately takes out another, but the slogan, which is inscribed on cardboard. uh, a poster that calls for giving a homeland and going over to the side of democracy. you look at what's going on in washington today, what's most clearly seen here is brightly visible here. and in the sprouts of baptism that existed several decades ago, cultural figures expose the island to scientists are denied a meeting. well, how is it possible at all? i can't even imagine

. uh, here a boycott has been declared by our classicist tchaikovsky shostakovich rakhmanin pushkin dostoevsky and by the way yesterday the whole world and russia we celebrated the day of the russian language and russian diplomats laid flowers at the monument to alexander sergeevich pushkin i drew attention to today's article. the york times tells me again that ukraine is liberating itself from the great classics under the slogan where colonization is some kind of nonsense, and the tonal article is encouraging, and this is exactly what uh reveals the relationship, uh, of the official washington mass media. e to russia e to russian a representative. e. the most important thing i want to say is this atmosphere. who is main, loser main, loser are ordinary americans. they are deprived of the opportunity to

enjoy the talent of outstanding russians, the local scientific community. eh, he loses a lot from the lack of the necessary exchange of experience with researchers from russia, but having said everything. this is dmitry, i must be fair and say that in america there are people and there are many of them who have a negative attitude. this is his sophobic company, which dominates today on television, the shackles of america, by the way, there is no unity in the administration itself, how to build relations with russia now faith is taken by hawks yes , calling for all-round pressure on us, however, even there i hear. i spoke to these people. i met with these people who say that we need to think about the future and we need to rebuild. uh, russian-american relations. here is the very common sense that i spoke to you about. here i have such a

question for you, and when the terrible tragedy happened in america on september 11, 2001, these bloody terrorist acts that claimed the lives of 3,000 people, approximately immediately assumed that it was was made by people from muslim countries. in general, this was clarified very quickly, and it was supposed to be, but at the level of the media literally in a matter of hours. and so president bush appeared on television and made a statement that the last thing the united states should do in response to this tragedy is create hysteria around the muslim world in general and especially around muslim americans. i have to

be honest, it made a big impression on me. and it brought the impression to the means of the mass media, where, in general, quite quickly, but such an orgy against muslims has become considered indecent, is the biden administration doing enough or doing something at all to, if you want, uh, show that american politics is the politics of the opposition to what the russian state is doing, but does not mean disrespect or company against the russian people. is there a sufficiently clear distinction in this respect for the administration of the canoe? you know, if earlier there were a lot of theses that the task of the united states

i will quote america between the russian people and the kremlin, but today i don’t feel this e today. uh, i uh feel a pronounced anti rejection of everything that russia does, you turn off the tv , you switch from one channel to another, you hear frenzied criticism, and in relation to everything that russia does, i think that the administration could do a lot more to to bring down this wave of rosophobia. well, in general, what are we talking about, if some hearings are held in congress, any problems do not arise in regarding the economics of socio-economic relations in the united states of america, they immediately say, but this is putin's fault. everything no explanations, no sociological economic calculations are given. russia is

to blame. would that the administration of the white house, the state department, but took certain steps to remove the negative plaque from everything that is connected with the russian federation firmly convinced that we should not be enemies of life proved that we can be partners, but in the near future. it will, uh, impossible take years, but i firmly believe that in the area at least the strategic stability that has always been, that was, the cementing link in all crises between the soviet union and the united states. there are great opportunities for collaboration in this area. uh, cooperation, let me say between the united states of america and

the russian federation, and anatoly ivanovich well, what you say allows us to conclude that russophobia, unfortunately, today in the united states is not only and not so much a social phenomenon. how many of the tools of the anti-russian policy are the policies aimed at weakening russia, which are carried out by the current administration, because the point is not only that the people walk with ukrainian flags, but also that they violate rights, moreover, rights are purposefully violated many russians, but assets are being frozen russian businessmen, journalists. they don't let you do your job properly. broadcasting of russian tv channels ah, and so on, and so on, this list can be continued indefinitely . by the way,

russian citizens are still illegally detained in prison in the united states. victor bout, is still in an american prison. and that is, uh, here, uh, really. i think there is one here . eh, some kind of purposefulness. yes. eh, some intent in e. that uh russophobia, oh that you er, say, i'm right or i'm exaggerating the scale of the problem. i'm afraid, as if, we would not underestimate. ah, the essence of the current problems. you have touched upon the key issues that our embassy is dealing with. uh, what is the aim of our activities here, you raised the most important issues - these are our inmates of our compatriots who are in american prisons. and we rejoiced at the recent event, when konstantin yaroshenko was released. and

today we are compatriots. and by the way, speaking of them dozens in american prisons. they are constantly faced with denials of medical care and the provision of necessary medicines. today you already said, uh, those names. i slightly expanded, but it is important to speak and demand release. and victor but and the novel. seleznev both. they suffer from a number of serious chronic diseases. all their requests, as well as the appeals of the embassy, ​​and the testimony of qualified medical care are ignored. i consider here a violation by the united states of international obligations ; i emphasize that the rescue from the american dungeons of russians is a key task. our diplomats. we will continue to ensure that there is not a single russian citizen in american prisons. a separate problem is what

you said is the work of russian journalists here in the united states. our colleagues are being harassed. they are faced with direct bans on broadcasting on american soil, they will be restricted access to an official event, the process of registration of workers is complicated, bank accounts are blocked, they are not left without attention and american special services regarding. the so -called freedom of speech does not go unnoticed. well, it is clear that there are no special services. e during the conflict will pay attention to people of this profession or something happens, as it were, more involved. you know, if put in general the problem of the activities of the american special services, when i already mentioned. this is today,

when pushing russian diplomats to russian citizens of betrayal. for me. it 's just some kind of bad manners. eh, well an incomprehensible phenomenon in general in life, when i see articles in the american media that call on russian military personnel to be russian diplomats. eh, to betray the motherland. i don't know, i just don't have enough words to express my disgust. uh to this kind of politics when i see that uh some uh people are around the embassy handing out business cards and the fbi there and saying that if you want to talk to the staff, then please, uh, here is the phone for you . uh, when do they give out those cards? you assume that this the real world or some kind of provocateurs. i have no

reason to say unequivocally that these are representatives of the special service or provocateurs. i say that we have such facts, and such publications in the american media are signed by highly respected colleagues, with whom, by the way , you and dmitry are very good. e familiar. i will emphasize mine, but the most severe rejection of such a policy of such an attitude. e to russian diplomats. you know your address too. i recently received a letter in the mail urging me to i would have renounced my motherland so that i would step aside and condemn the action of the russian president, and i was offered, if i so wish, to apply to the office of the first deputy secretary of state at andy sherman. well, they wrote a letter to the state departments. demanded an explanation as to what it means, i don't think the

american ambassador, the american diplomats in moscow, you asked about this, are getting this kind of. i find it provocative. uh, letters we're big this, of course, this, of course, is a matter of serious concern. yes, because we thought that relations with diplomats to diplomats and between diplomats. these are one of the very few rules in the world that still remain, apparently, apparently not quite anymore. so we'll take a break, uh, and go back to this studio. in a few moments, do not switch the first life and deeds of peter the great to hell from early childhood and adolescence

, we now have no time for jokes to build smart, so that everyone learns to work from the first discoveries and accomplishments, i want my russia like this to never go off the stocks into a frigate building cities of his belly did not spare people did not spare creation of a fleet and an army of a new type and birth on russia day only

now we raise the rate by 5 percent bonus on your first deposit in any bank on financial services, register and open a deposit online at the doll 's hinges, the weakest point, and i don't have apple the latest native complex collagen of the second type to maintain freedom of movement artyom the strength of native collagen for the joints. a new car has been built. ship

steel travel is the best way to be together for chronic joint and back pain. feel care from nature with vikasal vibrosal, an anesthetic ointment with natural ingredients , helps to gently deal with pain and inflammation day after day. find your way to freedom of movement vibrator wise. the choice against the pain of the bank's safety inform the infantry. first you offer medical services. you are at the right place, i constantly hear voices on the tinkoff dot ru website and get the most effective anti-spam protection and machine. he is so alone.