well, nothing is familiar. and you know more, what a shame, she didn’t just cheat on me. my best friend oh , now neither the wife nor the road is dear. i'm off the phone, don't be afraid. 20 more people, let them watch. listen to the dog, you won’t want to return your wife, then you won’t even want to call with this son. well, then the girls doggy plays with the doggy. you are talking to a girl with a normal girl. i

love dogs dog loyal, not what is it? grandma don't go. back back back back. i give the go-ahead for contact, we are interested in what is

on gladio at fiore's disposal after stop contact until further notice. according to the pharaoh, he must maintain operational communication with someone you need to open a communication channel, given their plans that you reported. he's probably here for the same purpose. hi dear. look who i brought. i am very glad. you look great. we have

a great occasion today. well, of course, wanted to celebrate the rise of alexander is a hungry great choice. thank you but never listen. don't take it for the money sends us 10 boxes. and these are guests from france french group direct action, but this is their leader fabrice chartier i wonder what they are all doing here? well, they should also have advanced training courses for killers , why are they worse than sales managers, for example, give yourself to teach anyone.

listen, the french are reacting to our tip. this is clearly a terrorist attack, the only question is where? and we will tell them everything, we won’t surprise anything, you will send it to the americans already. pay attention to this person. this is dominic garcia who is now i will explain, look at this. this is brandon wright. under shepard, they served in the training camp for afghanistan, they now work for the cia, that's the thing, officially they are on vacation, they have a vacation with their families in europe, they have a very active let him tell us everything about shepard and mainly. whisper is not stupid, he uses them.

only as instructors they do not know the time or place of action. they don't know anything. we can send them to guantanamo but we won't achieve anything. terrorist attacks in france and italy further. stop you have another pharaoh task working no news. good evening, the big game is on the air today , two very important summits were held simultaneously in

ashgabat, the sixth caspian summit was held, in which the president, vladimir putin, took a direct part. the heads of four other caspian countries also took part in this summit. this is iran azerbaijan kazakhstan and turkmenistan the parties adopted the final communiqué and reaffirmed their commitment to the convention on the legal status of the caspian sea, which was adopted in turn back in 2018 also in ashgabat vladimir putin today held bilateral meetings with the current and former leaders of turkmenistan, as well as the presidents of azerbaijan and iran at the same time in madrid e. today was the main day of the nato summit following the adoption of a new strategic concept in which russia is officially declared the most significant and direct security threat to nato countries for peace and stability. in the euro-atlantic region, and china has been cited as a source of systemic competition that undermines the rule-based order. well, that is,

american hegemony and challenging interests security and values ​​​​of nato , sweden also received an official invitation to nato today in finland and finally nato announced the buildup of military infrastructure in europe, primarily in central and eastern europe, approved a new package of e-assistance to ukraine, and even today there was a very important breakthrough in terms of international recognition of the donetsk and lugansk people's republics on the recognition of their independence and sovereignty, the ministry of foreign affairs of the syrian arab republic announced today, but we will now start with the caspian summit, and today vladimir putin did the following statement on the prospects for energy cooperation and logistics development of the caspian region, listen to the president. among the key tasks of the five, we certainly consider further building up regional trade and investment ties, deepening,

mutually beneficial industrial and high-tech cooperation, i note that the volume of russian trade with the caspian countries is constantly growing, so in 2021, trade turnover increased by more than a third, the five have great opportunities for interaction in the field energy companies are already implementing agreements on the joint exploitation of oil and gas fields located in the waters of the caspian sea, a lot in our opinion. to be done to improve the transport and logistics architecture of the region. first of all, we are talking about building an international north-south transport corridor. colleagues have already talked about this here. i fully share these approaches. this is a truly large-scale project of a transport artery with a length of 7,200 km. here, st. petersburg to the ports of iran and india vladimir dmitrievich from an economic point

of view, how do you assess the geo-economic significance of the caspian region as a whole, and in particular the prospects for energy cooperation in the development of logistics routes in this region. what did the president talk about? well, firstly, i would like to say that this meeting in ashgabat is such a logical continuation of the recently held forum. brix is ​​everything in the modern world. uh, probably more than when this was not about, international competition is above all the competition of alliances. uh, to put it in such a language of the network society. yes, this is the competition of global economic networks of supply chains of value creation and therefore, it is natural that e for russia today is a strategic line in order to survive in this difficult situation. this is the creation of new economic unions for the development of existing unions, so this is quite a dimensional process at one time in the

eighty-fifth year, this is the first time the americans, but they prepared a book in which they analyzed effectiveness of sanctions since 1914. she endured. uh, there are three editions and by the middle of the 2005 2007 there, the number of ineffective sanctions that were counted increased by 40% to actually 70 a and most of the factors explaining the ineffective sanctions that were introduced in history. here for this period. the ability of the country is just explained. against whom the sanctions are being introduced, to build our own, these alliances, to build our own, so to speak , economic communication network integration. therefore, in this sense, of course, the caspian region is of great economic importance. first, it is the region. including energy raw materials. uh, the caspian is transit , including, so to speak, channels, then this is catching the same oil. of course, it is a very large trade hub that allows you to transfer

traffic flows from south asia to e. to europe to the european part of russia a and. of course , even the presence of these countries that were present here today suggests that they are all different. well, iran and russia are obvious facing the consequences of sanctions and energy powers. but including uh, so to speak, the participation of other countries, but it says that these alliances today, uh, make it possible to significantly increase and solve the problem of logistics, which, in principle, uh, today in general, bring the whole world together. well, it also seems to me that the logistical route north, south, uh and uh has been talked a lot about the so-called continental curse of siberia, which has colossal industrial intellectual potential, but at the same time there is no direct access to the ports. yes and here is the northern sea route on one side. and that 's just the lists of the region on the other hand can live

allow e, the siberian resource products to find access to world markets. moreover, here we see only countries that are on the coast of the caspian sea, but we understand that they also border on certain countries. here, the connection with afghanistan, which is also a potential transport artery, begins to play in a completely new way, and therefore the union from tajikistan from turkmenistan is here extremely important. but the same thing applies, in general, to turkey, which is also not far and uh, iranian and uh, so to speak, a node, so to speak, yes, uh, energy gases and oil, it also plays a very important role in this situation for russia as you rightly said for yourself. well, here is the caspian region. it is important, it seems to me, not only from a geoeconomic, but from a geopolitical point of view. a and. a. here in the communiqué that was adopted today following the results of this resolution itself, for example, in particular the following principles. i will simply quote not the presence on the caspian sea of ​​the armed forces that do not belong to the

coastal countries and the non-provision by the coastal state of its territory to third countries for military operations against another coastal state. this means that the caspian region remains a region of cooperation and stability, unlike other regions of the world. konstantin fedorovich how do you evaluate? this is the region from a geopolitical point of view. well, i want to say that any sea, it can be either a source threats or opportunities both economically and politically and uh, the fact that it succeeds, despite all the intrigues and temptations to keep the caspian from the presence of non-caspian states here in the form of armed forces or there any bases, it in itself is an achievement of russia and iran, i think well, probably other states that go to the caspian coast, although, let's say, under the previous leaders of

kazakhstan, there was an attempt to negotiate with the americans that there were some kind of transit american e. infrastructure for which in general loomed a gradual e transformation. uh, at least the caspian coast of kazakhstan is a source of some concern. well, fortunately, uh, this was avoided, and, probably, the role of russia in this is significant, as regards the uh declaration, which confirms all this. it seems to me that this can also be written in reaching those states that, as you have already said, endured the pressure of sanctions, an attempt to isolate them in some way. i mean russia, i mean iran in this case themselves happened in turkmenistan of course.

this is such an important opportunity for the new president of turkmenistan to demonstrate himself. well, in turkmenistan, we know the power, in fact , is inherited, nevertheless, the new leader of turkmenistan for the first time hosted the presidents of other states within the multilateral framework. such a summit, and this is probably important to confirm his ability to be able to, as it were, the status of president. although we know that president putin also met with his father, who, as far as i understand, is now the head of parliament. yes in turkmenistan is well so to speak. it is difficult to expect that the state of central asia, which now gladly calls itself central asia, they

will jump into some other reality from those orders and traditions that they have always existed and still exist. so why is it important that they do not create problems for us . so i think that we, in any case, are not the western moralizers that we love, therefore, we consider it important to maintain relations on the occasion of being frightened these states, with regard to third countries, then yes, here an important remark is that the territory of the caspian countries of the caspian states should not be used for third countries to the detriment of other caspian states. although we know well that there are certain nuances. eh, hardly. uh, turkey intends to use its presence in azerbaijan to the detriment. there kazakhstan, turkmenistan and probably russia at this stage, but russia in general

is very vulnerable, because it goes to the coast. caspian delta. volga volga as it is known that it flows through the whole of russia, dividing it almost in half, so we are very closely monitoring what will happen there. and in this sense , it is by no means possible to underestimate or underestimate the need for cooperation in the caspian sea. i totally agree. konstantin fedorovich that this is this provision, this is the caspian principle, and not the presence of third countries that are not caspian countries. this concerns not only the west , not only the united states, but also the same turkey yes, yes, and uh, despite the fact that russia and turkey these are strategic partners, and yet we have a large number of contradictions. and just in the transcaucasus, first of all not only, but in the transcaucasus, including this, this is very important, uh, the thesis that the government of azerbaijan signed, with which today it was putin who held a bilateral meeting with turkey strategic partners for several

hundred years . well, we just had a difficult relationship. yes, but now our relations are characterized by tactical competition, but at the same time, strategic partnership is very short i can't replicate. thank you konstantinovich , it’s really ridiculous to assume that turkey, which is trying its best together with azerbaijan to break through this dzhangizur corridor turkey, which wants to go to the caspian sea turkey, which creates the great turan, he will hold back anything, especially this younger brother. uh, aliyev jr., who will restrain erdogan or turkey with these appetites. and when the turanian army is created, i think that the geopolitical situation can change radically in this region, so we must look both ways, because uh, well, as catherine said, a turk

cannot be trusted as if. yes, and i think that not without our participation was sprayed. eh, this thesis appeared. yes. well, let's move on now. e to madrid, where the nato summit is taking place, and today, as i said, a new strategic concept has been adopted there, which, as it were, emphasized the new mission, or rather the old new nato mission, in part. e containment of russia of containment of china, which is designed to prepare nato and conceptually substantiate it in the context of a new global confrontation and let's hear what nato's new strategic concept for russia

has just today said activities of aggression and annexation. she uses conventional cyber and hybrid weapons against us and our partners her aggressive military stance rhetoric and obvious willingness to use force to achieve their political goals undermine the rules-based international order. nato does not seek confrontation and does not pose a threat to the russian federation, we will continue to respond in a united responsible way to russian threats and hostile actions. we will significantly strengthen the deterrence and defense of all allies, increase our resilience against russian influence, and support our partners in countering malicious interference and aggression in light of russian hostile policies and actions. we are not we can consider moscow as our partner, nevertheless. we remain willing to support open. connect with her to manage and mitigate risks, prevent escalation, and increase the openness of the relationship. we are striving for stability and predictability in the euro-atlantic region and in

relations between nato and the russian federation well , to be honest, it reminded me of a letter from prostokvashino yes, because it is difficult for me to combine the fact that russia, on the one hand, is the main threat and an immediate challenge. ah, not a partner, but on the other hand, it is necessary to maintain stable and predictable relations, and nato does not threaten russia at all, as it is written in strategic hostile relations. how are you? hey, do you know these two paragraphs? i can't help but refer to one witticism. oscar walda. he said what you think, what you say, because you won't get a second chance to make a first impression. here you listen and understand that the confused think and confusedly expressed, as he said, vladimir of religion. there are uh, i think that in all these documents there are a lot of

such inconsistencies, because they are trying to unite not an association, not united in all strategic documents until the very last. it was said there that the main opponents are russia and china today, they decided to sort of separate us a little, uh, that we have now reduced the threat again. we've already seen the war there. we are the main thing there, and so on, despite the fact that they are all at home. everyone says china is the main enemy, not russia because china is much more economically powerful china has much more opportunities to destroy the us-centric world and so on, but this is it. well, such an attempt, but what can i say, and therefore it is natural. what i said, what catherine the great said, it applies not only to the turks, it also applies to the americans. why don't they all say that

china is the main threat. the british never talk about it. i think they are interested in this, so that we are the main threats. yes , they are in america in america, all political forces, if his two-party consensus is right, that china is the main thing, because england is england in general, uh, after the fifty-sixth year, there was no longer a great power and no one cares about the secular crisis, after which they went to the goal and from now on. they just now tried to get out of the shadows and it looks very funny, because god is to them because the clown is the leader of this great country, which had a great cultural , historical and military tradition. what should i do? well , you can laugh like that all you want, nevertheless. they create problems for us. well, well, it's not they who create problems, again, they are the big brother who creates these problems. they don't

represent anything by themselves. as it is not true, they are really, really trying to manipulate, including their older brother, so that he pays less attention to china and more to russia, they are interested in this. this is complete nonsense. this is the scale in america there is no one person's political class. there the decision is made and i am talking about the position of the political class of the american to the british and in general this myth that has been created. well, you just need to read a little more often a very interesting article in form on the face, where he speaks, leading english politicians and analysts. they say this is a myth that churchill created about the special relationship between england and america, england has always been considered in america as the main enemy and is always considered that way, they don’t say that a long time ago the anglo-saxons were not the majority, but among the whites the germans are the majority. during world war i, in general,

americans were afraid to go to war against germany because they thought they would have german uprisings, okay, that's another lecture. you you will be at my lecture. i'll read it all great. everything must be read, especially since the talk show is not for you at all, but no. why? this is also interesting, and to conclude? i must say that, of course, it says that this is what is being done now. this suggests that and the seven meeting of the seven showed. what are all these themselves? are you the western elite of these they are at a loss they have a desire to show unity, but this is an ostentatious unity. in fact, this unity at the essential level does not exist very much. serious conflicting interests, but even here's how not to refer. to you, konstantin fedorovich of the british, their traditions, even

someone already missed any conspiracy theory, that supposedly the royal family has its own special interests in earning money from the chinese. what you can't hear. here on our talk shows about some kind of hidden leverage that sparkling people do not worry about such interests. no, you certify. i'm not talking about you. i say that i just returned from mongolia where just about this is what the asians who gathered there said, but you understand, sometimes you have to pay attention to this too. well, i actually pay attention to asians, because it's hard not to pay attention to them, they are much more than europeans, and therefore i must say that this is a lack of a clear and precise understanding of what is happening in the world. what is the balance of power, what should be done? and this, of course, is a characteristic of current leaders, because among them there is not a single serious leader with

a strategic vision who could be leader and show what needs to be done. and how it should be done, how it was just happiness that during the second world war there were three such great leaders at once who understood and who could agree among themselves and actually sleep. if humanity, well, it seems to me that in fact there is no contradiction between the fact that the united states really perceives china as a strategic threat at a two-party level and the fact that nato declares russia a primary threat, after all, nato is a euro-atlantic institute. yes dmitry it's literally one second. uh, indeed, when the guiden came to europe for the first time, he said that the europeans should be subjected in general. uh, well, let's say an economic boycott, there and so on, almost sanctions against china, all the europeans said, sorry we have our

problems, because they have a colossal trade deficit, they tainted themselves and contradict, because i never bend my logic and all the time alone, not all the time from one. i just want to just say. that's what you really need understand a little, i think. i would only be glad if everyone were nonentities in nato and they were all known losers, and we would only be er about this. so to say, satisfied is your satisfied such satisfied. well, therefore, i would like to proceed from the fact that we need to treat the enemy and to the enemy in such a way that if we discover that he is a loser, that he is unworthy, that he is worthless, we would only be glad for this, but let's take them seriously and now if take them seriously, it is obvious that yes, there is absolutely in the united states an understanding that the main

economic competitor, especially china, but at the same time, there is, as it were rightly noted in europe , a peculiar attitude of a number of states towards who everything is - in the first place. and who in the second, what happened now, says that, including the uk, which has specially left the european union, is playing its own game and it is impossible not to notice this and its own game, and in as for her interests, her interest today is to be the leader of that bloc that splits against us. she is interested in china today in the fight against china than in the fight against russia, because she earns alliances with turkey with azerbaijan from this fight, she tries to do this with georgia, and so on and so forth. further with poland with the baltic states, but indeed great britain is the most anti-russian country in europe today , brexit did not greatly contribute to this, it untied great britain's hands precisely in great britain is the largest country in europe that pursues a tough anti-russian policy, but at

the same time in the uk it participates in a, b, and asian structures that are aimed against china, we will continue to talk about china after a little advertising. now you will be shown a funny story of a handsome mr. makli, from which everyone will draw conclusions according to their own understanding. i wanted i want to start a family. children or boyfriend? you just never loved anyone, you'll be afraid for the children who don't exist yet. he needs a sexologist walks rumors that you are the best person in the world. and you never wanted the essence to sleep in some security for 200 300 years, we need people. price oh not from fear of life, the richer people all the more do not like without death. we have individual

apartments, unfortunately, not cheaper than 20.000. i am ready to forever serve you professional salvation. the very fate of us to be together until death comes true, everything that is prophesied goes on a train to heaven a happy journey. oh, how we want, how we all want not to die, namely fell asleep. the halva card is surprised to guard the free installment plan for 10 months of halva, as before, they weigh nothing to you. still zero percent on installments of 0 rubles. there is no down payment or service fee either, halva weightless installment is a significant advantage. care from pyaterochka discounts for you people appears both weekends and working days.

i will help you prepare for your interview. even if you go to him for the first time at work, not only to see your light. you will find yourself in the future, in search of a job a person needs a person. center employment job russia your job is your job. in the war, pay twice for the winx video service, you do not pay twice. i don't cry, twice. i have a wink, a video service. wing profitably combines online cinema and interactive tv look at the loops of any devices rostelecom technology delivers opportunities with love today premier online cinema with a 50% discount and a 50% discount on cabrita baby food in investments signals may be incomprehensible. or deceptively simple and

it seems that danger is always somewhere nearby, but with a reliable partner for changing the market is only part of your strategy fridam finance is a reliable partner for your investment. magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products . report the move from the card. first you offer medical services. you are at the right place, i constantly hear voices on the tinkoff.ru website and get the most effective protection against spam and machines, tinko. he is so alone. now many are putting life

on pause due to rising prices with sovcombank credit make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your plans. sovcombank people are more important than you this summer in suitable for any occasion, meet discounts from adidas up to 50% on wildberries i'm an evil crocodile fangs from russia seeds. help out. i need tenderness sausage slivushki vyaznka from natural meat and tender cream distinguishes fabulous tenderness with them. everyone gets softer. i crocodile do not marry girls bound by tenderness, enough for all tourist route built. travel and

fast flock travel is the best way to be together for culinary delights, get up to 75% off on premium platinum choice cookware for chips and cook in style with platinum choice cookware don't forbid yourself to dream dot bank for entrepreneurs and businesses. on the air of the big game, we already talked before the break that one of the most important innovations of the new nato strategic concept is the open declaration of china. let them be an adversary, but nevertheless a strategic challenge that undermines the

version of international order that consolidate, the united states and this is a really big change, because well, russia has even officially been openly called a strategic adversary of nato or simply an adversary of nato since at least 2014. but china is mentioned in the main nato document for the first time and let's listen. how exactly is it mentioned. the ambitions and political coercion declared by the people's republic of china challenge our security interests and values. china seeks to undermine the rules-based international order in cyberspace and at sea, the deepening of the strategic partnership between the people's republic of china and the russian federation and their increasing attempts to undermine the rules-based international order are contrary to our values ​​and interests, we remain open to constructive engagement with beijing, including to ensure mutual open engagement,

the purpose of protecting the security of the north atlantic alliance, we will work responsibly together as allies to solve the systemic problems posed by china the security of nato and ensuring our ability to guarantee the defense and security of allies. here. i would like to emphasize here in particular that nato's strategic concept points to the russian-chinese partnership as a challenge to the us-centric international order. and this suggests that the united states is no longer trying to separate russia and china, which they have been doing for many years, but rather, they emphasize their tandem as a holistic challenge, as a holistic threat to the west and use this uh, uh a challenge to consolidate around the united states their allies and partners both in europe and in asia but my question is to ivan alekseevich, and european countries will agree to consolidate

not only against russia, but also against china and the russian chinese tandem. after all, european countries do not perceive china as an existential challenge. yes, the united states for them, china is an existential challenge, because it undermines the american primacy for europe, a little bit wrong china is still the main trading partner of the european union, in reality they are consolidating together. washington because washington wants it. i will give to yours. uh, question two opposite answers the first one is not wanted, but consolidated. now, if the americans really put pressure, really put pressure, i wanted to emphasize that this nato summit, in general, it was going to fail, but literally, in the last week or so, the americans made incredible efforts. and apparently, they promised something to a lot of people , but they pulled it out themselves, not in

essence, they pulled it out, but at least the picture created, that in general, everything that was planned. uh, they formally worked out very formally without artistry, but they worked it out like that, therefore, on their last legs, but they themselves pulled this one out, what is it that they pulled out, will they pull out politics, politics, will it not be possible to pull out politics, because they consolidated these are our own, but you know your own, they are not uh, not violent. uh, in general, the main interest of europe is comfort is the preservation of comfort is the preservation of what they consider. they reached in the second half of the xx we don’t fight for centuries and live well? so they want to continue only this, and in modern conditions it is becoming increasingly, er, increasingly, more and more difficult for americans to do this. they say our safety umbrella. no longer free, you will pull the strap with us. and not only

donate money, but you will give people, you will fight , and so on and so forth. go ahead, their comfort level is drawn into a confrontation with china e. it will be very difficult, so the desire to be drawn into confrontation. with china they don't have a and they would wanted to avoid this, but the americans are still leading to this matter. i would like to emphasize, emphatically, that's what a from my point of view, this statement by enatovskaya about china must be interpreted. so that the west does not leave attempts to return china, as they believe, to the path of truth, that is, uh, to return this situation, when the chinese mass industrial human and so on work for the western capitalist system, making inflation

in the west less, because chinese goods cheaper helps to maintain a certain level life, respectively, there european american politicians. they say that everything is fine with them, and on this they are re-elected and so on. apparently. that's the deal with russia for them. all decided russia so it is necessary to not even re-educate from their point of view. but it’s just that an attempt to erase russia is not even poly geopolitical geo-economic, but even we see on such a cultural, some historical plane , trying to erase it from world history from world reality with an eraser, which does not work at all, but they continue to balk at it. china, they are still trying to return to well, roughly speaking, to the enslavement of china so that china works for them, aligning it into its e into its system. we have seen the last month that there was an injection. here in

relations with china well, probably from the end of april somewhere until mid-june. yes, yes, until the beginning of june. see you. here are the defense ministers, and then we continued to think that we would strengthen deterrence. china's new alliance has even formed bbp. yes, but still it moved to some more political diplomatic level, that is, some kind of consolidation against china is underway, but here it is. at the forcing of the forced e movement to escalation, as we observed, for example, during the end of april in may, and it somehow stopped, everything was a little bit back and apparently. that's what you repeatedly discussed in your transmission. will they go to two fronts. at the same time, apparently, they will not go, apparently, after all, china will make at least one more attempt to return. china will try

to return china in its e-e in its e-e. china into this system, so that china and he worked in tandem with the western system, served it, and ultimately worked on it. er, if this is true, then there is no limit to western myopia, because the policy of involving other centers of power, including china, this policy was carried out in the eighties and nineties, especially the years, the climax of this policy was china's entry into the wto and the united states hoped that gradually would lead to transformation. china, it will become a liberal democracy and so on. right now, this is more of buying time for the trump administration's crucial situation. eh, in my national security strategy admitted that they were wrong when they believed in the ability of this involvement of china to transform it. somehow it's called sponsored steak. holder. yes. e responsibly maintenance. they are called, of course, nixon discovered and they were just saying that as soon as the soviet union collapsed, it was necessary to put a barrier

in front of china, then this sharp growth of china could be stopped. they didn't. that's why they say the strategy has failed , they have to keep fighting for two front, but another thing is that they will change the prioritization of these fronts, and depending on the current developments. but here is another very important decision of the nato summit, and this is the build-up of the military presence and the build-up of the american military presence in europe and a. build-up of nato rapid response forces in eastern frontline countries. that's what concerns the first question of the american presence in europe about this today. uh, said president joe biden, look, we're going to keep adjusting . our position depending on the current threat, and in close cooperation with our allies here in

spain, we are working to increase the number of destroyers located near naval bases from four to six destroyers. in poland, we plan to establish a permanent headquarters for the us army corps in order to strengthen our interaction with nato on the eastern european flank. we are going to deploy an additional team of more than 2,000 people headquartered in romania. in addition, we intend to to strengthen the already existing military formations and create new ones in the baltic countries. we will also send two additional f-35 squadrons to the uk to increase our movement and create additional maintenance stations in germany italy this is the american military presence in europe and regarding the buildup of the rapid reaction corps in the countries of central eastern europe and the baltics, jens said this, toltenberg today, but the figure is called 300,000 military personnel, but it is important to understand and just said about this today,

100ttenberg that these 300,000 will not be permanently stationed in the countries of central eastern europe and there will not even be a physical buildup. and these forces will be assigned to the places of possible, so to speak, deployment of probable deployment in the countries of central eastern europe; they will periodically come there for military exercises. and here is what will really grow. these are heavy weapons in the countries of central eastern europe, the headquarters infrastructure. logistics reserves again in terms of weapons and military equipment and and so on, that is, it really happens. the movement of nato's military infrastructure to the russian borders, which once again emphasizes nato's categorical refusal to respect one of the most important requirements of

russian security a new arms race in europe, or perhaps it is already in the wind. we have already been announced that you are starting us a new stage of frontation with nato and it is still not us, it is actually open and not only is it strong. i still would not put a sign of identity between nato and the usa even to the point that is often in our words. well, maybe i'm no exception sounds like nato is the united states and then there are european sheep. they somehow, so to speak, go and blaze after nato, because, well, these occupations there, germany, the military bases of the strikers, so to speak, other atomic bombs are forced. are you a free fall american no? not so, a little bit so, because if we just start even with general vykologue and data, because, as they say, the devil is in the details, and the truth is in the numbers, then you can make sure of interesting things. the first 450, somewhere even more than millions of the population of the european union is colossal absolutely everything to take the western world

the collective west in practice to this person, but now we are talking about europe that the evil nato in the person of the americans allegedly wants to force something to do, so this approximately corresponds to e , a military potential of a million bayonets. if just you will take and sum up all the national armies of the french 180,000, and the polish one, which he wants to bring his contingent to 250,000. and so to speak, the belgian, which is rather big to cancel and spassky, where abrams wants to represent, and the germans banned two dot numbers, they said, we are not yet ready for ukraine, and so on and so forth somehow took the rule of such an arithmetic exercise. you get about 800,000, or even a million people very well armed in the actual space and we are at the start, which, by the way, are fired by those same french howitzers, self-propelled guns. more precisely, they are just caesar's doves, they use the french navigation system in order to get to the ministry and a number of other things, therefore, from this point of view. in principle, we are now observing an exit to the surface. in general, i would say

an anti-russian trend, which is by no means characteristic of america, but in terms of the consolidated and already accused west, behind which, by the way, there is a fully consolidated system of military-technical cooperation. here guides. arbas, this is approximately. like our e tenth grader. now an eleventh grader. i think that boeing is about civil aircraft. well, it will. naturally, first of all, we will not talk about defense just by itself, but it’s not at all a common truth for many that airbus is on medium and adds and its pino scations and is actually a consolidated single, military bloc, which is now being spun into constant confrontation, not only with us, but from china, and when we talk about china, i would not forget. and about the archipelago was asked for the so-called islands, which china washed up and did it specifically to control the south. forgive the way, but actually squeeze the way. i am terribly squeezed by a man at the throat, because without this there is none. europe, america may still live along the paths with you, but europe lives precisely by the strait of malacca and everything that concerns

passing by the archipelago. it is very important to remain in the northern sea route, so from here. i just suggest that everyone look carefully at nato optics nato association russian temp because, first of all, it is a maritime civilization that lives by importing 80% of the american labor market. what is the service sector? yes, unlike ours, we have an industrial camera, which is why, returning to the topic of a purely military one, which is actually sacred and also 300 million euros are spent on factories for interesting numbers and the americans are resting. with american thirty million euros, not even 30 million dollars. it's che a little higher still will be well regarding their distribution. the exchange rates are changing, so he gives it quite, by the way, we are americans 56 billion. so well, these words are comparable figures, and i apologize for the role of the password and password. when i see it in iron in metal, i appreciate it then i can say, and the french represent milan at the moment, or rather anti-tank missiles. naturally, so to speak, an anti-tank in a missile system.

milan is already in all the provocateurs, it’s set on edge, you can generally quote another, but now it’s not the questions that are gouged out to the reference type, but rather about the fact that they are quite france and, by the way, first of all france, the presence of romania and a number of other countries, are just behind the creation of the concept of a single european special forces and build-up. and the forces of the baltics and, uh, i finish, to say so too, and not to monolize the word thanks to this one for patience. longsuffering, in fact, nato has such a concept, they fully apply it in ukraine is called. and the hit is literally, hit and run here, why are they teaching ukrainians at this moment, that is, mobile mobile groups. and by the way, the concept - it's french. not because i'm a nato specialist. i'll just remind you who actually arranged afghanistan for us. let me remind you that, in fact , afghanistan will be the last. now i will say my remark that in 1978 a meeting of the heads of various security systems of the western bloc in rome and alexandre damaranche, the head of french military intelligence, who said we would destroy the

soviet union by dragging it into afghanistan and the americans took these weapons. by the way, you are absolutely right. they don’t exist yet, i repeat the second world war they called red-cheeked fools, but they are, of course, germans, great. everyone thought so , the nasa military, but yes, the americans of odessa thank you somewhere. here's another aspect that i would like to discuss, er, as a result, this is the nato of today . this is a significant increase in rhetorical, and we emphasize the word of rhetorical support for ukraine and a whole series of statements were again made that the military conflict should end precisely with the victory of ukraine, belgian prime minister alexander droro said today. yes , ukraine must continue to fight. because the conflict can only be resolved on the battlefield, a very atypical statement for the belgian prime minister, and the british foreign secretary negotiations with russia are possible only after her defeat. well, in ukraine, yes, and since negotiations before the defeat of russia will lead

to a fake peace, which then in turn will lead to new aggression. well, uh, nato secretary general stoltenberg. and nato must prepare and is ready for it for a long and very long one, and the war and the conflict should end on the terms of kiev, yes, that is, the rhetoric really, yes and uh, it once again shows that in the west they treat this conflict as an existential one, on which the fate of their world leadership depends on the outcome of which, but not everyone in the west and not everyone in the united states but agrees with this. here in particular, what is written on the pages of the magazine foren policy toolse geart is a very famous, former, uh, member of the house of representatives, co-authored with a senior researcher at the think tank. e defense prioriteds defense priorities by daniel davis

because lieutenant colonel daniel davis . ultimately, us policy must change into this reality for the benefit of its own interests. while there is still time, kiev still controls 80% of its territory. a change in us policy will give a chance to save the lives of ukrainians and prevent further territorial losses, at least. the baytan administration should stop focusing on weakening russia and instead prioritize diplomacy by helping kiev and moscow end the war through negotiations in the us national interest to prevent the war from escalating in ukraine or spreading beyond it, despite deciding how and when this will end. the war must kiev and moscow american weapons and other assistance fuel the military efforts of ukraine

freedom of action is like ukraine has such united states but washington's interests differ from kiev's interests well, i must say that in the biden administration, as cnn tells, many say that the time has come to reformulate the concept of victory because the way the concept, victory, was understood before, that is, some kind of offensive ukraine and e. the return of ukraine and those territories that it lost after february 24 is absolutely unrealistic. and so i want to ask, konstantin fedorovich, firstly, do you agree with the chair of sigebrt and daniel davis, and secondly in this context. and how do we understand this , uh, hawk-hatted rhetoric that we hear, and at the nato summit it's just for a red word for themselves, or they again return politics to the faith and victory before the war to the bitter end. i can agree with the quotes

you have just reproduced, but it is my deep conviction that the policy of the united states in the near future will not be guided by this approach. it's quite obvious, the united states how? it seems to me that in this story so far looked like a beneficiary, because in connection with what is happening between russia and ukraine, they are strengthening their positions in europe, they are consolidating their allies, as they have never been able to do before to such an extent. they are promoting their armed forces or their deployment capabilities what you said about the number of troops which in fact may be virtual, but in fact this is a military expert i think will confirm that it is about creating base warehouses for deployment for deployment, including the rapid reaction forces, that is,

today we have. biden has serious domestic political problems, and they can be associated both with how he behaves in relation to russia and with other circumstances, but no. it seems to me that personally i do not have the feeling that things are moving towards some kind of change in politics under the impression of the difficulties that this confrontation creates, on the contrary, this confrontation. in fact, it forces all those dissidents within the nato of the european union who are for more moderation for more comfort and so further and so on to shut up and fit into this line the behavior of germany the behavior of france under the genius of italy to a lesser extent, she was less active, but in any case, france germany definitely wanted to somehow. well , somehow mitigate all these circumstances went. to do this, e to kiev, after which boris johnson urgently arrived there to check to ensure that

nothing happened. it seems to me that the anglo-saxons. and in this case, they act at the same time, they are interested in the fact that the question of how will look like victory is the second question. for them, victory consists in weakening russia, not at all in advancing. there, ukrainians somewhere farther or closer they will recapture some territories that are now under the control of the russian armed forces and the donbass militia, in fact, the question is that the long-term strategy is to defeat russia defeat russia because so that potential allies of china in russia to blackmail with the fact that if he helps and supports russia too much, then he will have problems with the economy with his assets of all kinds, so to speak, so that china will choose

the very comfort here and not its geopolitics, because it is clear that china is now saying, you help us, or in any case, do not bother us to deal with russia, because the next act we will begin to deal with you, but it seems to me that the chinese are not stupid people. everyone understands this, on the other hand, they do not want to lose. they do not want to lose today. although i understand that in fact, uh, we are talking about, not only russia, we are talking about in general, about the principle of whether china will be independent in the future or will it be forced to obey, the very rules that they are talking about, that is, to me it seems that what is happening now is this. in fact, the strengthening of these anti-russian tendencies within nato is the subordination of the will of the hawks within nato to those countries that are trying in some way, well, to crawl aside. will this policy be successful, will they be able to implement everything

will different countries be able to withstand the pressure, such as hungary, say, or someone else? this is a question of the future whether they will be able to or not, but the question is that such an attempt is being made, therefore it is intensifying, therefore some kind of cocky one behaves like lithuania with its transit and starts arguing even with the european union about whether it is necessary or not, in fact it limit, so it seems to me that now there are no serious prospects in order to talk about the crisis of this confrontational line. actually, of course no. and what happened. uh, on the lieutenant himself there was absolutely no one nothing new happened there. after all, even before him, our foreign minister spoke, who said that russia became an enemy a long time ago, of course, it has simply always been this enemy, even the moment when we kissed in the nineties hugged. and at that very time they were moving further east, just in case, in which case they would be closer to russia and be able to strike at her. and the fact that the goal of the united states e.