the chinese model is based on the economic desire of the chinese to make a breakthrough. e in such a production chain to become, like japan in south korea, a country that produces its own high-tech under its own brands based on its own developments and redistribute the market at some point. in general, they were actively doing this, buying up european technological assets and old european brands. therefore, yes, since the seventeenth year, they have already begun to accept documents on chinese trade practices that abuse freedom of trade introduced a system for monitoring chinese investments and began a movement the same as in the united states to gradually push the chinese away, but since there is no single decision-making center in europe, and chinese money plays a role. well and so, all quickly cannot there. well, and the nato summit, which ended today

in madrid, was certainly remembered, er, by the supply of new decisions, but by the supply of arms to ukraine, a lot of loud statements were made on this score. in particular, us president biden announced that in the coming days the united states will transfer a new package of military assistance to ukraine in the amount of $ 800 million, which will include, including air defense equipment million e dollars and will also go there. uh, means against missile defense, france germany the netherlands, for their part, also announced the allocation of new uh, military trenches to ukraine, but ukraine nevertheless constantly declares that it few and indeed many western experts. they say that these are the volumes of aid, despite

the fact that the numbers are large yes, we are talking about billions, but nevertheless these figures, these deliveries cannot turn the tide, they cannot change the overall balance of power, and on earth the question arises . why the west does not substitute much more, and weapons e ukraine, here the answer to this question was tried to be given by a very well-known, and british specialist on russia, caygiles, who works in the famous chat house or at the royal institute listen to international relations. russia was successful at the time as the offensive. in the east , ukraine is slowly advancing in the west, while the realization that this conflict will not end quickly the war is dragging on because russia successfully deters ukraine's western allies and does not provide the necessary weapons and ammunition systems is the biggest obstacle to ukraine's victory

there is still fear of a russian response to criticism of the current level of western support characterize the current situation as an example of self-restraint by the united states and its allies, who are afraid to provoke an escalation of the conflict, but the reality is much simpler. the russian information company of threats and truth brings the expected effect. it is causing moscow's opponents to shake the widely held notion that provoking russia would be catastrophic . this is moscow's key victory no , petrovich, but it seems to me that this is a very bivalent statement, that's whether kirzhails. ah, which many of us personally know, but they call for not being afraid of russia, right? eh, it’s as if it reads between the lines that this is russian blackmail bravado, such a bluff, yes, and you don’t have to be afraid, and then you need to supply much more weapons. or is it a recognition that deterrence, including nuclear deterrence, works. well then

, actually, in another conclusion from the article, it jabbed. you just have to accept the inevitable defeat. and not only ukraine but also the west as a whole, but nuclear deterrence works and not only nuclear ones. see how they fight. eh, the russian army is fighting with limited forces with very limited forces and understands that if, uh, the more they are included, the more russia will be included, this is also understandable. and secondly, you know, we often talk about arms deliveries. uh, multibillion-dollar multimillion-dollar equipment, but it's not like , uh, they have it there in germany, for example, a bunch of this expression has been decided, they send it by echelons. yes, i have them and you don’t really have them. but in general, there are some who don’t have it and somehow don’t have it. yes, this statement is, on the one hand, propaganda. right now we are delivering, on the other hand, uh, a statement that works for the military-industrial complex. now we

'll do it, let's do it. you see, the money has been allocated. we start, uh, delivering more and more. this process, this process, the realization of these millions and billions can drag on for a year, in order to find a way out and not undermine our defenses from this statement. it is clear that they are afraid of russia yes, the more we supply take from yourself. and what will happen, and suddenly a conflict. what if the answer is russia, and suddenly they will answer to kaliningrad right now. and we don't have anything anymore. or we have very little, and everything is there in ukraine uh, burned down and so on. so this is a very difficult question. and i feel that the kremlin is not afraid of this. they now understand that there are more words behind this, while the armament is certainly on, but it, as it came, after a while it is no longer there. but it's like a bottomless barrel, and to solve the issue

of mass supplies, but uh, even with all the power of the united states, uh economic they say, there about europe yes. eh, it's very hard. it's impossible. this is only to the detriment of its defense capability. so there is such a rather vicious circle, it turns out. it's a very important argument that giles didn't make in his article that many western countries simply don't have anything to supply. and, of course, yes, when olaf scholz openly says that we supply in ukraine what is not in service with the bundeswehr itself. yes, here we are producing there, in a few months we will send it, directly from the factory. poland speaks. in, that they no longer have a single tank, because they are already everything, e that they had from the soviet era from the warsaw pact was transferred to ukraine, but at the same time, here's what's interesting, some western leaders are doing completely crazy. in my opinion statements. yes, uh, one such example is markutte, uh, the prime minister of the netherlands, who said that ukraine should be supplied

with weapons even if we ourselves are completely defenseless without weapons. yes, but it's irresponsible. it seems to me that it is related to uncle sam uh, in which case uh will support, but nothing depends on holland, but holland , together with germany, decided to supply, uh, howitzers six point six howitzers to ukraine although this, of course, is bad, any arms supplies to ukraine escalate the conflict inside ukraine lead to e new destruction of primarily civilian infrastructure. but here, uh, i would still like to emphasize, uh, the thesis that jail brought, after all. here is containment, yes, here, uh, containment is a matter of faith. yes, you believe. or do you not believe that in case of violation of certain red lines? you will receive an answer. yes and here are roasted some e others. uh, western

experts periodically forward the thesis that and let's try not to believe it. and this is very dangerous, i really hope that we will not get to that, and when in the west they really test whether their belief in containment corresponds, but reality or not, we will continue in a few moments. it was a series in different areas step by step dnr lc liberates its territory. militants hit cities from jet systems, we cannot forever be ukrainian hawks. artillery, which street

with caliber 130 mm were dealt such furious blows? yes, they just come out . as for the organization of the trial , it took place within the framework of the current legislation on the air of rap, so that it does not mean that you do not hear rap - this is electronic warfare radio. pringlegera on the first but you italian passion in every fragrance there are things that will not disappear anywhere our accumulated decades of experience that helped us become stronger and survive all crises 1.300 branches across the country with real professionals who are

ready to help in real life, and not just in advertising government support and the trust of tens of millions of customers. everything, this remains unchanged, as well as our responsibility to you. that is why everything will be in order with your money, as the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the opportunity to support loved ones at the most necessary moment. dad might want when not only housing, but also we understand our sea, therefore, in the housing lottery we will raffle off apartments by the sea for a super prize of 700 million, housing lottery. open the door to your winx dream you don't pay twice don't pay twice. i don't

cry twice. i have winx video service wing that combines online cinema and interactive tv on petya on any device. himself choose the benefit get for hotels in cashback return a large selection of hotels to the ozone, and cashback up to 10%. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with credit from sovcombank, make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your plans sovcombank people are more important than one crocodile russia needs tenderness sausages slivushki we knit without natural meat and tender cream are distinguished by fabulous tenderness with them.

everyone becomes more tender i am a crocodile. look at me, now i'm in an advertisement for gloria jeans super son on a t-shirt from 199 rubles. gloria jeans has everything for your culinary masterpieces. get up to 75% discounts on premium platinum choice cookware for chips and cook with taste with platinum choice cookware for loved

ones just a little ice cream, pure line, please own and close taste buds. in investing , the signals can be confusing and danger always seems to be around, but with a reliable partner, part of your strategy is to have a reliable partner for your investment. there is a big game on the air, and today vladimir putin visited the headquarters of the foreign intelligence service and, according to the director of the foreign intelligence service of russia, sergei naryshkin, poland is one of the countries that no longer believes in the victory of ukraine and, moreover, believes that the ukrainian

military defeat. uh, it is inevitable that the fate of the regime zelensky in ukraine is deplorable and in this regard, according to russian foreign intelligence. poland is already working on the issue of creating a proxy state on the territory of western ukraine, which is under e, polish domination. and i want to ask, rostislav vladimirovich, how do you generally assess these polish ambitions in ukraine, well, firstly, he never hid in big ones. that is, it is a traditional polish policy. we have been talking about the last 30 years since the emergence of independent ukraine sees it more as a buffer between themselves and russia and was not going to lose this buffer anymore. and that is why, by the way, the poles did not hide this either. they emphasized this to the people, so they were the so-called advocate of ukraine in nato and the eu, and they tried hardest of all to drag ukraine into these two organizations, since by doing so they fought not for ukrainian security, but for their own, i don’t know how they

evaluate. there is an opportunity for ukraine to survive. i think that they used to evaluate it depending on skepticism. uh, mean, but uh, anyway, in in any case, they planned to plan, and will plan in the event of the defeat of ukraine and always any headquarters of any government. well, in such a situation, to plan some two outcomes yes , victory and defeat, in fact, you need to plan more, which means that in the event of a defeat for ukraine, they plan to create a puffer zone classic of the state or some territory even as part of poland now they are trying to actually conclude with zelensky’s regimes. she's got more to lay claim to an unlimited number of territories of ukraine and thereby allow bargaining on the idea with russia well, as they want, at least. you are trading for yourself the best conditions of the post-ukrainian world, that is, polish foreign policy traditionally proceeds from the following premises, russia is an enemy, russia is an enemy from a

pathological one, the farther from poland russia is the better, if russia did not exist at all. it would be very good, therefore, in poland, it seeks to push the russian border. it is possible further from yourself, firstly, secondly, to put between them russia and any state or several states and thirdly. if this fails then advance the polish border. actually as far east as possible. they did it and will continue to do it until then. until more disappears again between russia and germany because more is the second problem more always has two enemies. the first enemy is russia and the second enemy that they hate exactly a little less is germany and they can’t come up with some reasonable well-known foreign policy unite at least the enemy against the second, they always pull their mustaches, and one and the second they unite in the united states first with france, then with britain, then in the united states. they are always looking for a distant ally to help beat their nearest neighbors and they always get the result. uh, such a format of the

world, when the nearest neighbors decide that if there is no more, they will live more calmly. well, now it is still far from that, that poland is going to divide ukraine in its own interests. but in principle, they always went to this and always go not by chance butcher more happened of enviable constancy. we count three of them there, counting only ekaterininsky, in fact there were at least five of them, so even now they are not moving in the direction of the sixth. well, uh, poland certainly poses a very serious internal challenge to the decision-making process within the european union. and i must say that now in the european union, debates have sharply intensified, and fundamental internal reforms. moreover , a reform of such magnitude, which may require to adopt a new treaty, and the european union, thereby replacing the lisbon treaty from 2009, when it was ratified, namely, it is proposed to abandon the consensus rule when making decisions on foreign policy issues.

yes, well, they say that these are the difficulties that the european union encountered during the discussion of anti-russian sanctions, remember that the sixth package was discussed for more than a month, and the difficulties associated with the problems of the expansion of the european union will increase even more. perhaps, number of members of the western balkans a. then again, yes, the status of candidates was granted to ukraine and moldova in general, while decision-making was within the framework. e even the current composition of the european union is difficult not to mention the increase in this composition and in this regard, first of all chancellor scholz. that every next step in the enlargement of the european union should be linked to the internal reform of the european union, that enlargement without an internal reform of the eu is unacceptable, and recently josé barrel and the head of

european union external action services listen returning to the question of eu enlargement requires us to do similar efforts in union reform and decision-making, which means narrowing the scope of the unanimity rule in foreign policy and other areas to make more qualified majority decisions at different times. we paid the price for the principle of unanimity in eu foreign policy by devaluing and postponing our actions. at the end of may, we reached an agreement on the sixth package of sanctions against russia, but we needed this month. i regret that some final provisions were softened and patriarch kirill was excluded from the list of sanctioned persons, despite the fact that his presence there was not disputed during the discussions, in general, the right, veto, and the eu member states on

foreign policy issues. the last symbol and instrument of their sovereignty this is the last thing they have left, which reminds us that the european union is a union of sovereign states and when it is said that let's decide on foreign policy issues for the qualified majority, this is what the zhel is talking about. this deprives the countries of the european union of the last instrument of sovereignty, and it seems to me that this could be even more deadly for the european union than enlargement without reform. well, because i'm far from convinced that such countries as poland, which we just discussed, or france, are a permanent member of the security council and they are a nuclear state. this is how they part with their last remnant of their sovereignty. uh, you rightly express doubts that this decision will pass

easily and be accepted. indeed, despite the fact that the european union is a very deep integration associated with the renunciation of a significant part of sovereignty, everyone still wanted to preserve some piece of sovereignty, and above all the issue of defense and e and foreign policy, but i there seems to be another element, besides the fact that there will be a desire of countries to retain some piece of sovereignty that binds them to history, tradition, and culture. to me there seems to be another element. in this, you emphasized that this is the right of the century. still, the reverse side of the right-winger is consensus. they emphasized all the time that this is a concept and that what is being offered is actually the recognition that it is no longer possible for europeans in europe to come to a consensus, to come to an agreement

. only due to the actually forced taking away of sovereignty in favor of either leaders. uh, europe or brussels, uh democracy, so bureaucracy, yes, that is, it's not only. uh, a blow to this veto and sovereignty, which, uh, it's right, but it's the same. eh, here they are signing their own inability. when coming to the world. consent to agreements by all that satisfy everyone, that is, a common denominator. it is disappearing and this is very important, because it will eliminate the values ​​of the european union altogether. after all, they have emphasized all the time that the european union is something unique for the second half of the 20th century. this is for through which peace has been achieved. in europe, which has not existed for centuries and refusing this

voluntary restriction of sovereignty, moving on to another model of actually taking away sovereignty. they are changing the model of european integration from this one, as they declared, the unique one that developed after the second world war to a more traditional one, which has always existed in europe several times in different centuries. this was the forcible unification of europe, in fact, european dictates and these models were charlemagne yes napoleon hitler but this is an anti-european union in the form in which it was decorated, as he understood and how he himself is not even anti. they do n't match at all. it's not that one against the other is in no way correlated. they refuse what they seem to have come up with, all this did not work even with the traditional model of uniting europe through dictatorship, but in fact a

dictatorship, where there are e, dominant powers, but before it was some kind of dominant figures is impossible. no wonder all these examples are historically associated with some kind of, uh, such historical figures. and now all this will most likely be. here in this series is the model karl the great napoleon hitler and brussels diplomacy ivan alekseevich here. you know one of the main and most popular theories of european integration called the liberal intergovernmental approach claims that the eu countries do not even give up sovereignty, but they kind of unite sovereignties and increase them why because it is beneficial to everyone? yes, a and if they have now they really demand to give up the last remnants of their sovereignties, then i think that brexit will not be the last case of leaving the european union. moreover, the

european union, uh, is abandoning not only the model in accordance with which it has been developing for many years, but and from its legal nature, which he declared again, starting with the adoption of the rome agreements of 1957, granting the status of a candidate. e. v. the european union ukraine and moldova for geopolitical reasons and not providing this the status of georgia and according to which it is much more suitable for the criteria for membership of the european union , it just shows how far the european union has gone far from the normative and legal nature and becomes a geopolitical instrument. and another vivid illustration of the geopolitical nature of the european union is that by granting the status of a candidate to moldova, the european union, it turns out, does not force moldova to join the anti-russian sanctions, as the

minister of foreign affairs recently stated. uh, moldova nikupescu and immediately a question arises. but remember serbia for many years, serbia twisted its arms and all that can be said is that the status of a candidate for the european union is incompatible with cooperation with russia and every candidate for the european union. just the same, it is obliged to join the anti-russian sanctions , serbia is obliged to join the anti-russian sanctions, but moldova is not obliged, i in no way urge moldova to declare anti-russian sanctions. well, i just want to illustrate here is the inconsistency. how does it feel to you nikolaevich eh, it was always difficult to talk to them, because they said that we do not discuss geopolitics. we are not interested in her. we have already outgrown. uh, this stage of our history, we will

talk about democracy and about value. at the same time, and this is what c said - it is said outside, and it has always been different from what is said inside, because, of course, you have a precise partnership a and you have the idea of ​​expanding the european union to the post-soviet space is always inside. eh, if not the european bureaucracy, then at least within the countries of the main engines of this process there have always been geopolitical explanations for this, that we need to push russia, that we need to create some kind of buffer, that we need to spread influence, and so on, and times have become more complicated. and if i may, so to speak, the true nature of things comes out. those geopolitical arguments that were

previously packaged in e. here is this beautiful wrapper of valuables with bows. now they are open. and we can, of course, reproach them inconsistency double standards double triple quads whatever, uh, but uh, did we ever take their value talk for granted. that's frankly, we ever trusted them. they they ever gave us a reason to think that they are serious, that they are sincere, that these values ​​are universal in the sense that they apply to everyone and never gave us a reason to think so. so here, well, you see, a and a moldova and serbia and georgia ukraine a see, uh, an example of such, uh, sincere and

an open explanation of who they are, why they are and what they can expect? well, not by chance today , uh, sergey lavrov is a minister. del once again emphasized that we would no longer believe them, but nevertheless. this geopolitical nature of the european union has one advantage, they feel, when to stop and not to cross completely red lines. and an illustration of this is the issue of the kaliningrad transit, where the situation began to sort of change for the better for russia, er, and for everyone, in fact, aside. uh, here, uh, one of these days reuters said that the european commission and the external relations service of the european union are putting pressure on lithuania and germany, by the way, are putting pressure on lithuania a and are inclining lithuania to a compromise agreement that will normalize transit from russia to

russia through lithuanian territory, namely, the european commission is actually prescribes the withdrawal of the kaliningrad freight transit. from the sanctions regime and, already today, the president of lithuania, gitanes na useda, said that this issue should be settled between the european commission and russia yes, where there is no actual subjective participation of lithuania and this completely contradicts what lithuania, uh, said a few days ago, because the same guide is on our mustache. yes , the prime minister urged brussels not to make concessions to the european union in any case. e of lithuania, a-a ingrida, szymanita stated that that paper, that explanation that the european union prepared by the european commission, in which, apparently, the

regime for the withdrawal of sanctions was prescribed, lithuania was not satisfied and lithuania returned, so to speak, this document back on revision. but today, nevertheless, lithuania is buckling. yes, but from this whole situation you can do. the conclusion is that it was lithuania that was the culprit of this crisis. and even if the european union didn’t add something there, yes, due to non-professionals, the force of unprofessionalism, and employment, and so on, did not clearly spell out the withdrawal regime, then it is obvious that the european allies as a whole did not want a partial blockade of e, the kaliningrad region . and here, lithuania interpreted it this is how it created this crisis, which is still a continues. uh, leonid petrovich, in your opinion, such behavior of lithuania is stupidity, this is a desire to curry favor with the united states. it's both together. is this the hope that the united states will support lithuania, as it did in the case

when lithuania half recognized taiwan, for which it received the full program from china in general? how do you explain such behavior of lithuania, most likely, after all, these are the orders of the main command represented by the united states well, let's try. a. well, let's feel it. i am think position changes. by the way, we don't remember much about it. uh words uh, security secrets. uh, patrusheva he said the answer would be very cruel. i think e russia has found channels to transmit both in brussels and here. and what we have done, and i think it had a very strong effect, that in this case russia is ready to take very tough measures. measures, perhaps they said that we do not rule out forceful measures, and i think this is why

the retreat began. uh, brussels and such a, uh, semi-retreat of lithuania and so, of course, everything is here, what did you name and commission the united states and earn extra points and show that they are not just, uh, an ordinary puppet. they're on to something . they themselves dictate to russia, imagine this succeeded, yes, well, this is the great victory great lithuania, the grand duchy of lithuania, and so on and so forth, so here, it seems to me, it’s very , the secret is secret, but it was russia that worked e showing that it will be possible do. it seems to me that lithuania has very serious complexes. and so we talked about the differences there between poland and germany friction yes, but lithuania has a history. competition with poland did not belong to a single state. they can't share. which one is the main one? yes, but if poland claims to be the main

russophobe, in europe, then lithuania is constantly trying to dispute this and say no. but we are even more russophobic. this, by the way, is really expressed in some of the actions that lithuania has taken both within the framework of the european union and within nato literally from the first days of its participation, uh, in these structures, but the pragmatic nature of the united states and the geopolitical nature of the european union in this case gave lithuania a cap. and i would like to return in the finale, but to the speech of vladimir putin, but not in the foreign intelligence service, but to the address that vladimir putin presented to the participants of the 10th st. petersburg legal forum, which is taking place today in st. petersburg and e, in this address the president is very detailed and very. it seems to me that he clearly outlined the ideological and value base

of russian foreign policy and the russian approach to world order, listen in the multipolar world of the 21st century there should be no place, no equality of discrimination between states and peoples, therefore our country stands for the implementation in practice of the fundamental international legal principle of the sovereign equality of states and the right of everyone to their own model of development. the russian agenda in international affairs has always been and remains constructive, we are developing multipolar relations with everyone. those who are interested in this attach great importance to cooperation in the un group 20 brix shows and other associations. russia is open to dialogue on ensuring strategic stability maintaining non-proliferation regimes for weapons of mass destruction improving the situation in

the field of level control fair rules of international trade and competition, while russia will continue to strive to form a more democratic and just world, in which the rights of all peoples would be guaranteed and the preservation of the cultural and civilizational diversity of mankind. this is actually a concentrated expression of russian foreign policy tactics, and we see from these words that russia remains and will remain a responsible great power, which, even in the current acute confrontational conditions, is ready for a dialogue with the united states on strategic stability and russia will remain a responsible participant in the global governance and the clearest expression of that more

democratic and just world that the president spoke of is brix and already in the near future. it can become not even a five, but a seven, or even an eight-nine. and maybe even more so that the future of brix was a big game. good luck to you. hello , the program time will tell, we continue to work live as part of the information channel on the first ya artyom sheinin. today i have to start on a sad note 8 years ago today. ours died colleague operator of channel one anatoly klyan

pogib is doing his professional duty. where it was already then, the very war that many did not notice not then, not eight years since, did not notice either this war, the shelling of cities or the deaths of civilians and journalists, and from our channel from other channels of journalists who were shot on purpose, knowing that these were journalists, and even then it was clear to everyone who wanted to understand that those who oppose were from the ukrainian side. these are the people who can shoot at peaceful on journalists aiming to fire. and so on. we remember all of them. and we, i hope , will complete the work that was started then, for which so many people gave their lives,

including my colleague anatoly klyan, and when i say, we remember, this is not a figure of speech in an amazing way. today i was sent a comment by a woman sent from nizhny novgorod and wrote that my daughter and i were very touched when we learned that the operator of channel one died there and later, and the daughter was small and later years two years ago she painted a picture. imagine painting a picture. the girl is now 14 years old. this is how memory lives. we remember everything and forget nothing. as for the agenda, there is also a lot of news on the agenda today that

caused since yesterday and caused today a lot of all sorts of emotions, not always pleasant or difficult, let's say the first news, it was yesterday, but we officially learned about it from representatives of russian departments officially today it sounds like this. yesterday 29 on june 144, an exchange of 144 for 144 military personnel took place; it was organized and carried out on the direct orders of the supreme commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the russian federation, since the life and health of our servicemen, the fighters of the donetsk and luhansk people's republics, which makes up the majority of the returned, is the most important task. everything else, then almost all the liberated wounded or seriously wounded by him. already, it turns out, all the necessary medical care , let me remind you that the total number of military personnel in ukraine

captured or surrendered is more than 6,000 people. and when i talk about what we learned from official russian sources that this exchange took place only today. i mean , we actually learned about this yesterday first from the ukrainian media . uh, then from uh, denis pushhirin, head of the donetsk people's republic. i. and yesterday. eh, it really was obvious that what lieutenant general kanashenkov is talking about today is really true, because, looking at the photographs ukrainian side from our side, no photos, no video material. uh, no, including we didn’t film these ukrainian prisoners, these are the shootings of the ukrainian side, i emphasize, from which , nevertheless, it is quite obvious that these ukrainian shots show ukrainian prisoners, among whom there are already exchange prisoners, among whom you see a really large number. how many

ambulances. you see, there are, uh, seriously injured, there are quite a few amputees. ah, that is, and it really gave a lot of seriously wounded wounded amputees, and i can't say no to that. since yesterday, i was surprised by these kind of emotional seethings that began in social networks and so on and so forth. i have the impression that for some people i understand everything, 4 months of fighting . eh, how many emotions there is a lot of information, but for many people there is some sort of shift going on. people discussed yesterday up to foam at the mouth that they gave away someone to whom? it seems that it was not necessary to give away, there are azov nizovites, my friends, my returned 100 44 of ours. konoshenkov was returned to you about this, the lieutenant general said they returned everyone in

a very serious condition. maybe you can guess, why not, our personnel, which we received from the other side, because if they show them to you, in what condition the ukrainian side will issue them. in which she always gave out on the exchange of ours from the other side. you're going to be hysterical again . so, if these people had not been exchanged now, and the word exchange, you may like it or not, the word exchange implies the conditions of that and the other side in order to pull out their own sometimes you have to agree to some conditions. and just forgive me emotional idiot. maybe they don’t understand this or breed some on this occasion. so to speak, suffering, many of ours, which we received. they just wouldn't live to see the next exchange. just decide for yourself , what is more important is the principle or that our boys return from there pilots, who are generally there to an

extreme degree. well, they just wouldn't make it. i can hardly contain my emotions. but these surprise me things. i understand, but you don't have to. fetish. oh , they gave away the azov people. azov is, among other things, a military unit, part 30, 57 leaders are in lefortovo in moscow, no one is there. you understand, no one did anything of this, but our boys returned, you need to talk about it, they remained alive. god forbid, they will cure them, go to their wives, return to their mothers, who can return to the front. and the second news, which also caused a lot of emotions today, which i again reproduce through the lips of lieutenant general konashenkov. june 30 as a step of good will the armed forces of the russian federation completed the assigned tasks on zmeiny island and withdrew the garrison stationed there, thus demonstrating to the world community that the russian federation does not interfere with the efforts of the un

to organize a humanitarian corridor for the export of agricultural products from the territory of ukraine, this decision will not allow kiev to speculate on the topic impending food crisis, referring to the impossibility of exporting grain and for russia's total control of the northwestern part of the black sea now the word is up to the ukrainian side, which still does not clear mines, the black sea coast near its shores, including the port waters. about this news, of course, there is also an emotional component. and also on this occasion today a lot of emotions have been said, a lot of emotions have been expressed. i will not express my emotions on the air. for those who are interested, you can in my e telegram channel. it is called very simply shanin called who is interested in my emotions. you can read it there, but this story, of course , has a completely objective military, a component that needs to be discussed without emotion, and with people who understand this and we have such a person, and now he actually

acts as a war correspondent, since he is in the zone of a special military operation. this is vlad shurygin a. hello vlad. how can you hear me? hello everyone, i hear you. okay, hi. well, so it turns out that you are our war correspondent in the war zone, and the news, uh, that i want to ask about, uh, your opinion or your attitude? and we have here, about, uh, exchange. ah, yes, yes, please, come on. exchange no, well, about the exchange, then, uh. well , i'll tell you i fully support your position. i believe that anyone perverted from captivity, especially from such a barbaric captivity, is, well, how to say, god's work, you know? because it is easy to talk from the couch that it was necessary for all the azov people to be taken prisoner, not to take everyone, to destroy everyone, to imprison them to one. well, first of all, he’s absolutely right, because

for this not only war criminals, but also people who served in general. the number is like that, that is, like minimum. those who are not involved in the crimes simply have the status of a prisoner of war, but we are talking, of course, primarily about our guys and, probably, i have only one complaint already, once again to our people responsible for these exchanges. uh, and the claim is very simple guys why don't you show our understanding? are they criminals or are they impossible to demonstrate at all. they are the same heroes, they deserve to be at least. and see their eyes, you know? and most importantly, of course, no need to report. uh, after you understand ukraine when all this has already been thrown in and everything is seething, and we are still waiting and now we are passing it on. uh, hmm uh, microphone first to someone who has to voice the content for the day talking about it, then we, of course, are a little suppressed. we are a terrorist

trust, i repeat. we have done a good deed. we rescued our guys from captivity. this is absolutely right, if they had not been saved, who would have lived to see the exchange. i don’t know, because the state in which this ukrainian scum returns our guys to us, given that we are every day show. in what condition are their prisoners, how do we treat them, but this is really nazism, so they need to be saved. it's not just about sharing it's about saving their lives, so yes we did it. yes, it's necessary. yes, there is nothing to talk about. and who has questions? let them just look at what is called patience and see all the video exchanges on the internet. there , these dozens of ambulances, with the help of us, will see these legless, armless stretchers, which, in principle, we saved, i note. we saved their lives. and now we just exchanged them for ours. uh uh or if it’s completely unbearable for anyone that the azov people or someone else there are being exchanged for ours, then you can go

there and do this combat work there yourself. well, it means somehow to do so that there are no prisoners , if the second question is completely unbearable, and the snake, and the military component is your opinion. uh, your uh, score and so on, let's go. well, you know, i think that, of course, the story with the serpent we started accidentally dragged on for at least a month, the battle for the hut, the forester, has been going on. even last time, when ukraine issued. eh, i mean, i tried. attack the snake and uh, do you remember all these stories with their landing on the island, when they were kicked out of there even then, in principle, the experts had a question. eh, why is he why? we need it, how important it is, because it is obvious that, at least, even if you are guided by ukrainian e, healthy records and from satellites that were provided, it is clear that there was no one on the serpentine except for air defense systems and the garrison itself. that is,

there were no our missile systems there, which were supposed to intercept there. uh, the ships that should be just along the coast, that is, it was already simple, well, the schwerppunkt, which was not something that was prestigious to arrange, but at the beginning of the operation it hangs had a definite meaning with the configuration that was planned now, it really is already such a battle in which slowly meaning was lost and what was brought out, well, again, i think that this, in principle, is also an absolutely logical thing. well, we can, of course, explain this further about our good will, you understand? it's probably right that our good will but ah, as i already said in itself stay on the serpentine. uh, now it doesn't matter, we have all the possibilities to control the serpentine remotely, we have long-range aviation for this. we have an operational missile-tactical complex for this. we also have submarines for this. we have everything for this, that is, from the fact that you

simply moved away from the snake. they just stopped holding on to this piece of land, but also the lives of our equipment and our guys, so i think that the decision is quite logical, but, as it were, as always, in this case, would like to have. the information component of this decision, i see . tell me, please, about the military component. i understood you correctly that you are telling me that ours came out of there. this does not mean that it has become ukrainian and will be controlled. ukraine, i haven’t been able to understand this yet, that is, it is no longer ours, but not yet theirs or how is it, right? i think that of course ukraine, uh, will try to land there and hoist its flag. but try to hold on to the serpentine henceforth it will be called uh, the struggle for the vympel

under the name. eh, die like a snake. you understand, because our capabilities are operationally tactically much superior to what they had in ukraine. if ukraine flew there in rare points and periodically just dragged a bayraktar, which we shot down or there were landing boats, then we have the opportunity, then with a pair of our operational tactical missiles periodically an island just sanitize. you know, there is such a medical expression, but here or disinfect, if there to take certain brown animals, well, so for us, of course, in this case of necessity. uh, now, like i said to be, right there right now, no, will there try to hold on to ukraine, but i think they'll try to lose a few hundred more there. she may have thousands of e of her e, depending on the military. how many waves? they will be sent here, but in the end, now the serpentine one will be such a remote point in space that it has no meaning for the ongoing war now and

will definitely not have it when we talk about what that's where the ships along the coast will seep in and out. i would just like to remind you that it still has the possibility, from the air from the sea and from under the water, to influence any ship that goes at least there at a depth of 10 meters, so, of course, this is not quite, as it were logical. the explanation there of the same how important snakes were for us, rather snakes, was important when, uh, some big landing operations were considered there, or, uh, some other operations that could rely on this island, but now, uh, i repeat, he, for us personally, moved to the periphery. uh, the military activity and the role for us is really big does not play these forces for us much more needed elsewhere. you understand the zmin air defense forces, they may well cover, uh, you understand half of donetsk, so i repeat. uh, the operation went through without loss. exactly this. the main thing,

i understood you, thank you, and this was the opinion of a military expert. vlad shurygin about the military component. and the fact that this is how it was announced today, but our servicemen left. uh, i still don’t understand this island, but the fact that they left it, whether ukrainians will appear there or we will prevent this, and we’ll see, but, of course, everything in this life, in addition to the military component, also has a political component, of course that ukraine will now celebrate, uh, some kind of victory. and how she, in fact , always celebrates it, and moreover, in an amazing way. they already had a video about the release of the serpent today, which suggests that they probably knew something about it in advance. from a political point of view, well, from a political point of view, it is absolutely clear that any point on the map of present-day ukraine has moved from where? russian army? the russian army will return there so the snake

is not needed until the moment of the assault on odessa, as for the fleet, unlike russia, which has quite significant fleet forces in the black sea. ukraine has a couple of landing boats there uh- huh, so it’s a win with a snake - it’s just going back to plant a flag there, there are again 15 people who will have to be later, which means take out sevastopol. uh, give water to feed, but no no. there is absolutely no tragedy here. i believe that there is no need to feel anxiety about this either, because the military has absolutely clear reasons for their own plan of action. and this is the situation. it will unfold according to this plan until the moment of the storm in odessa, i do not think that it will be of strategic importance. he understood this. i am within this. uh, in addition to the political components, i wanted to ask you. e question. i don't know, i don't want to impose my opinion, but here

as regards your past, uh, profession and current, that is, political journalistic and political such. it seems to me that after this story with the bull. after we left the kiev region as part of a goodwill gesture. it would seem to me that even making certain gestures. here is the term gesture. goodwill must disappear from our political lexicon forever. what would you propose to replace it with sounds, given your, so to speak, political awareness and journalistic profession, we will help our colleagues, because, well, we are all together, we are on in fact, we are presenting with you such couch observers who do not know the details of negotiations with llc on the export of grain, they are guessing. why did they leave the serpentine there? and what about the grain? why did konoshenkov mention grain and so on. in fact, there is a rather complicated situation. yes. and i want to say about good and evil will.

there it is, good one. the will is evil. yes, it means good will, when it comes to our friendly states, we are talking about grain that is sent to north africa in southeast asia and so on. that is, if we are talking about this, then here it is really a gesture of goodwill. and if the idea is to turn along, so to speak, the coast to sneak somewhere into bulgaria in order to catch more nats from there. to armament, of course, these targets will be destroyed perfectly. that is, why am i saying, i knew who to turn to, that, after all, i perfectly understand that everything has. eh, explanations, and you gave it to me, that in this case we are talking about tin. goodwill, not in relation to ukraine yes in in relation to the united nations and countries that declare a frenzied shortage of grain. although, as our president said today, there are 5 million tons - this does not greatly affect the market, but nonetheless. we

carefully remove this trump card from their hands gently, as usual, gently remove the extra card. version accepted. yes, well, as a person i also have journalistic experience, and as an editor, i would suggest such a wording. i would not say, but they were all tin. uh, generals to our said, a step of goodwill . i would say the need to avoid unreasonable losses are exactly what vlad said, honestly and clearly verbal tightrope walking. we don't need anyone, she doesn't like all the experienced people watching, including artyom and your programs, where, well, with all of our existing some discrepancies. and i admit that everything here is fair. here's how it went on the air. honestly said, tell me how there is a hut. forester there was no point in clinging to this rock for so long. and it is

really right to bear such losses. he said that these air defense systems would be much more useful in donetsk or in some other places the military will decide. in what places all that i understood, in my opinion. but here i will remind you. yes, when we left kiev, there was also your program. do you remember we talked about a strange war, yes, and from this point of view, with good will, this is a phrase. yes, well, it doesn’t matter, connected with that kiev departure in a certain part. e of our patriotic segment of the association, probably with the same part that i was indignant at the prisoners, spoke about something at the beginning associated with a sign of our weakness, and serpentine is not at all in the kiev region, serpentine is really a naked rock, which the ukrainians bombed, well, quite often. let's say. yes , it is, and, but for her sake, that is, she captures.

on the first day, in addition to the character. had, probably, here, too, from the sofas argue to get wet, probably, some meaning in the text, perhaps, vlad shurygin said about it that it mattered in the context. uh, the assault on odessa will be able to assault, which, apparently, is now among the first or an attack on odessa by land, yes, but now by itself it does not play any role plays. this is true, but here another question is also in the context of grain, but it is clear that this is a step of good will. here i agree with peter olegovich. and this is in relation to the entire world community to african countries, to show that we are open to the export of grain. we do not interfere, but the west will not appreciate this step voluntarily either, that is, russia, as they poured mud on the grain issue, will continue to pour it on, but at least not on the west on africans. and here we see the delegation of the african union came to moscow for three weeks

back and returned, by the way, with very good comments that after the meeting with putin , the president of the african union was satisfied. the russian position understands that it is doing everything to ensure that there is a flow of grain to africa. and so on, that is, for them it is really voluntary, but i will now allow myself to think from the sofa. and what about in the context, let’s say, turkish, everything is under the word, let’s say in the context of turkish initiatives on well, some to organize these peaceful grain shipments from ukrainian ports, but to africa and not become isn't it a serpentine vantage point for the turkish international observation point behind this choice? and that gives him, uh, gives this island another dimension. if you can also shout , then the nationalization of the conflict will come. here are the turks on this sacred land, where when where three

weeks ago was the russian flag. and, well, 4 months ago there was a ukrainian flag, a month ago there was a ukrainian flag like that. here it is this snake island such here this snake island but, but, nevertheless, such a probability cannot be excluded either for the general the cause of peace, and the export of grain and the elimination of hunger in africa is beyond doubt. in general, the business of the whole world, and such an internationalization of the snake may be more important than, indeed, if the ukrainians put up a flag and quickly fall down so as not to be shelled. well actually, thank you for your answers for your versions and er, well possible interpretations for me it was very important to talk about these two complex and surviving different opinions and emotions in society problems, firstly, in order to show. and what, and you can always the same seemingly unambiguous story or situation, if you just think a little and not get emotional right away and it’s all gone, the plaster is removed , the client is taken away, but just a little thought,

maybe a little silence, step aside, figure it out, listen to smart people and it turns out that in any situation there are a lot of measurements, both military and political, psychological and informational, up to those that seem at first glance, not the most successful phrases, and secondly, and for me this conversation was very important in order to well, how to show that snake island looks one by one, if you look at it on such a map, but it looks different if you look at it on a map of europe, and it looks like a third if you look at it in a map here on a map of the whole world . and i'm sure that in those offices where large maps hang. they look at it and make these decisions from the point of view of what is there on the big map, and we , of course, do not know all this and do not necessarily have to, because war is always a maneuver or a

counter-manoeuvre, and we cannot always understand where and about what we are now maneuvering in one place. or maybe it has something to do with something else entirely. but i also agree with this, that perhaps this needs to be explained too, but in fact, for this we exist in order to explain this and talk about it calmly and responsibly. a gloomy type, i would be afraid to meet him alone in a dark alley, he came from somewhere in the northern swamps. we have a real monster in our hands for several years, he hunts for women, and no one sees anything. the killer could have you to see maria on sunday at the first professor

voskresensky my wife is an advertisement for vtb and it's time to talk honestly. there are things that will not go away our decades of experience that helped us become stronger and survive all crises 1.300 branches across the country with real professionals who are ready to help in real life, and not just in advertising, government support and the trust of tens of millions of customers. all this remains unchanged. that's why your money will be all right, as well as the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the opportunity to support loved ones the most necessary moment for beauty and hygiene olives and black olives with a

discount of 50% what seems to me that we have become group 1 in order to get a discount; now we don’t have a single tariff package. tele2 has different rules, without changing the personal tariff, everyone gets a discount to join the group, even if you are from different cities, each of you will receive up to 15% discount and your connection will become even more profitable. unite in groups and get discounts from tele2 new holy spring refresh with taste of fruit and berry pleasure.

in investing, the signals can be obscure or deceptively simple and it seems that danger is always somewhere around, but with a reliable partner , market changes are only part of your strategy, a reliable partner for your investments. dima a. i'm here at mts bank. well, you're your own. well, help me there,

so as not to wait, i thank you, man. refueled me such a cashback came. sasha is enough. they love good deeds, but again cashback. but at first i thought you didn't like me much. no, sasha, at first i didn't like you less. thanks not at all. thank you for everything you've done for me, you've done nothing . this is mts bank and a super cashback subscription to the most popular categories of 5% at lukoil gas stations in supermarkets, cafes and grocery delivery. how embarrassing is nothing? look

at me now i'm in an advertisement for gloria jeans super son on a t-shirt from 199 rubles. in gloria jeans program time will show we continue to work live, in the previous part we discussed that any conflict, any military action, any confrontation. and it's always besides everything else also maneuver. well, respectively. now let's continue the conversation about how we should understand or how we should interpret the maneuvers, including the rhetorical maneuvers of those whom we are now opposing or, more precisely, those who have declared that they are opposing us on behalf of all progressive humanity. i mean, a bloc of nato or the eu this plus or minus is about the same thing. well, most likely the nato bloc led by the united states of america, in which, i must say,

intense maneuvers are also taking place, and which are also maneuvering. well, you can say e globally, but because their situation is very complex and constantly changing. here they made a very difficult one today, and i would say such a strategic maneuver, because yesterday they had them. yes, since they were all fed, uh, at lunch with russian salad, that is, on the menu, you can imagine nato yourself had a russian salad on the menu, so , of course, all the relevant people were on the occasion. this is a serious organization. quite belligerent, they , of course, worked this out. perhaps even someone was bombed there today they made a complex strategic maneuver. and today this dish is present in the menu of the sami donata attention. what is the name of the traditional salad in this sense? i really like it that the soldier’s salad is traditional, but in the case of such great military powers as belgium and holland lithuania

latvia luxembourg it seems to me that this is a very important renaming for them, given their military traditions. and i only mention this to the fact that these people with these military trades and the french. as if there are winners. germans in world war ii, and it seems to me that it is very useful for them to rename this salad from russian to traditional a well, so that they do not forget. uh, about these military e traditions. yes, they are salad. they are just like that themselves salad well done as in that anecdote. yes , you will have meat, and vegetables, vegetables will also be meat. yes, that means that this is, respectively, a traditional salad. well , you see, uh, a new meme has been created. yes , a traditional salad, and another distinguishing feature of these maneuvers, including our rhetorical ones. eh, how is it now? clearly, not partners. uh, this is

, uh, a nato summit, but it sort of takes place in such an absentee format, moreover, starting with gs7. this is such an absentee format. well, look, it means that at first they are discussing at the big seven how they would all undress. we are with you yesterday. but you can watch this forever and listen too, please. jackets without jackets need to undress. let's wait until we take a photo. we all have to show that we are cooler than putin, we will arrange a show of riding with bare chest, riding - this is better. we have to show them our chest muscles. by the way, only today i noticed how joyfully ursula reacted to this offer of horseback riding. yes, in fact, why am i saying that this is such a model of modern politics, because here the big seven is gathering, which claims that these are the people who now they are administering, which means that destinies back and forth, something they say such things jokingly among themselves, betraying their subconscious, but then

after a while we immediately arrive, which, as always in international politics, the answer arrives, we listen to the respondent. i don't know how they wanted to strip to the waist or below the waist, but i think it would have been a disgusting sight either way. well, if you remember pushkin, i can make a mistake there in the words in detail, but, in my opinion, he said that you can be an efficient person and think about the color of your nails, so i definitely agree with this in the chat everything should be harmoniously developed both soul and body but in order for everything to be so harmonious. uh, gotta stop the abuse alcohol from other bad habits. uh, exercise. to all the colleagues that you said, i know them all, personally, we are not having the best period of our relationship. this is

understandable, but nevertheless, they are all people. eh, they are leaders. so there is a character. and if they want to, they, uh, need to succeed. they will definitely succeed. but you need to work on yourself. i repeat, this is not just, uh, rhetoric good or not very good, but jokes are in some sense emotionally or in tone , this is a model in many respects of today's relations. there, so this one we'll show him now. now we mean this one undress, undress. johnson already so to speak, it was in this. so in the group category, johnson in the individual category, too, so he decided to call. uh, i called you to the carpet yesterday, please. and putin if putin were a woman, which he obviously isn't, if he were a woman, i really don't think

he would start an insane masculine war of invasion, violence the way he did, if you want a perfect example toxic masculinity, this is what he is doing now in ukraine the answer immediately flew, again this is again how it is now arranged at the level of tonality, so here. well, in my opinion. of course, i am not a connoisseur of english humor, but it seems to me that this is some kind of a little bit of a madman's reversible nonsense. how does the answer sound, please. i'm not going to say now, if it were, i just want to in this regard. recall the events of recent history, when margaret thatcher decided to start combat military actions opposite argentina for the flatlin islands , here the woman decided to start hostilities, where these actually are the islands and where britain again about the international tone yes

, you started. yes, here you are back and forth, seriously, we started. we are not like that. and this is that, we are the first such that it is not so arranged. well, if so a little bit, well, in the traditional uh, lettuce in this case, the russian salad. like this, too, very uh, very something like that, yes. well, just to make it clear to everyone on the question of where the uk is where fact client islands, wow, how would chile as a snake. about like a snake. yes, approximately, that is, here, well, that is, everything with such not even hints, but such half-hints. well, that is, well, guys, what are you talking about, where are you going? what are you talking about , wrestler, well, if there are a couple of stories about women about the war, something about women about the war, because well, let's make it short. well, you can remember, okay, there the magician says to flow an englishwoman, this is all out of place, but the world is gold. she was the sixty-ninth to seventy-

fourth year prime minister of israel and there was a war of 73 years, in short, against three states, for example, or catherine ii, who is here. and now we don’t have a map of ukraine, there are many regions that now we don’t know that there is a map of ukraine and would not believe. that the map of ukraine is just about in all nikolaev kherson and maxim with these stories simply added what i’m talking about, that, roughly speaking, johnson demonstrates by this that it’s just there, well, it means that ringing even at the level of rhetoric, ringing simply. and also here is such an olive of victoria in the crimea, ours fought in general, and also russian salad freo. here. well, like another one, so this one here. well, i don't know, everyone keeps score in their own way. of course, i'm not objective, but for me it's 2:0 in favor of you know who. well , that means stoltenberg. putin the third round

of stoltenberg says that nato has been preparing for a confrontation with russia since 2014 and it’s like, like , here we are, as it were, listening. we must regard this as a fact that since the fourteenth year they have been preparing for some kind of active action against us. for us it is not e exactly the news. uh, that explains our determined actions to protect our own interests. they e for a long time they needed such some kind of external enemy such, around, which could be, uh, around. i am a threat that could unite allies around itself. i say, first of all, about the state. well, iran was not very suitable for this role. russia fits better we are giving such a chance to unite all allies around us on a new historical rifle. well, uh,

nothing new for us. e once again confirms what we have been talking about all the time, namely, that the nato bloc is a rudiment, a past era of the cold war era. all the time we were told that nato has changed, that it is now, most likely, a political union, but everyone was looking for reasons and opportunities. uh, give it a new impetus, exactly. eh, just like military organizations. well, please, they do it. there is nothing new here for us, nothing new. for us, not here, but interesting words about what we really gave them a chance to unite around it himself of all allies. but here are a couple of very interesting nuances for understanding what is between these allies. eh, the matter, of course, is not a lengthy matter, it may be in human relations, but nonetheless. they also play a role. a pay attention to the second day of erdogan. well, it's a troll. e johnson here. note. he approaches

him. here pay attention to johnson's reaction well, that is, no matter how much he likes it. now once again we have this video. yes, one more time. here, pay attention. well, that is, as you understand, who is this here and hand and hand. let's drop it. let's. well, don't like it don't like it. yes, erdogan approached him with this. and it's you, ryzhik, sitting here, why did it all start yesterday. of course, these are allies, of course, between turkey , britain and so on, but it started yesterday, when in the presence of biden this question about allies who are united took place like this conversation, please. this one shames us, it's a joke. so it's nice to put us to shame. yes , calm down the sea back and forth, and no matter how everyone understood, in fact. this is the question of unity. and

here's one like this. here's the fact that recep tayipardan, and i understand him perfectly, he did not forget boris johnson, however, not as prime minister of one of his antics. boris johnson did not know, of course, that he would someday become prime minister, that he would come to nato summits, that he would have to meet erdogan's jeep-top in this situation, and in the sixteenth year , boris johnson, as mayor, london took part in one amazing and interesting competition. well, since he is such a deep politician, well, solid and very high-status. well, he needs to participate in some serious contests all the time, and he took part in a political contest. i remind you of the sixteenth year, please. i am pleased to announce that we have a winner in the competition of offensive poems about erdogan organized by the spectator. here

is a poem by one anxious turk. all the time your cigarette butt. until early spring fell in love with a tale without any preludes, moron the author of this winning entry, former mayor of london and a leading brexit supporter. boris johnson is currently an mp. ta-dan, of course, this is not the only, perhaps not a critical obstacle between, but this is a very interesting nuance. it's all in there. and yes, and by the way, given that this is all he is only for a poem that he wrote 6 years ago. i won’t even guess now how he will have to in due time, and sooner or later he will have to be responsible for this whole inverse thing. uh joke about uh women i won't guess. well, boris will have to answer for everything in this life. is there really time while there is already an answer? so well, in front of the british embassy. today

, a people's graffiti appeared, where boret johnson is depicted in a woman's dress with the inscription, if only my grandmother had, so, accordingly, in the language of a potential enemy, all this was done. just really these people in the main. so, if you look at this round table, uh, everyone has, uh, some kind of, well, not to say perversion, but some kind of their own feature that makes it. e scary, no matter how similar not typical and at the same time popular, but among a society that supports a minority, that is, johnson is a macron clown, sugary. uh, so lover of male kissing scholz. he just lacks rags. here is his look. you know how, according to the expression of one comrade, he wipes his hands with a rag. here. well, in principle, these are people who just need to understand that people are people, our enemies are not partners, nor friends. these people are our enemies, they are

enemies in word and enemies in deed. now when they supply weapons to ukraine, they are also enemies in deed and these people will end their political careers in the dustbin of history, where they will kiss each other for god's sake, whatever they want, there will be hugging and taking off their shirts, and they say torsos and all that, but they will not be, they will not be, because the european middle class, which they will be destroyed by their efforts due to sanctions, he will demolish all this sugary audience with his own chips and cartoons, led by a person who is already there. well, just unconscious, which is led by the united states of america, that's all, and all of them will calmly be somewhere in non-existence , so take seriously the fact that this is some kind of geopolitical joke. i wouldn't about it people. of course, i do not take seriously the fact that this is a geopolitical joke. this, of course, jokes quite a personal. although they are made.

uh, leaders of states, yes, a hostile namblok, but the conversation is about what, what are these people? yes, there with their chips, which someday, god willing, will end up in some kind of dump of history, and maybe in a dump. in the literal sense of the word, this time will show, but these are people who, in aggregate , have a strong enough economy so far, while in aggregate they are strong enough and the armed forces and their ability to pump up weapons are people who, on this very same day, after they renamed the salad, nevertheless adopted an e resolution, a, in which they declare that russia is now the most significant threat to the alliance, against which they will act, and so on and so forth right here here this here uh, they write uh in english on white the russian federation is the most a significant and direct threat to the security of the allied world. stability in the euro-atlantic region, we will continue to respond to russian and this is where the question arises. when you say that these are

enemies and these enemies make such statements. we started discussing it yesterday, but it is significant today , after all. these people, whom you so humorously describe yourself, are people who, as you said. yesterday. here are the indigenous. these are naked kings who, by inertia, are still trying to pretend that they are the rulers or they are still strong enemies, who intend to shift the level of confrontation with us. starting to the next level here, but taking it higher, well, relatively speaking, here further everywhere, considering how they will hang. here is the most important serious no longer a joke question. it 's actually very simple, it seems to me. the fact is that all the european leaders of the current generation, who are gathered around the biden at this table. all these are people who have never overcome any special difficulties in their lives. by the way, unlike our president, the same difference

it also extends to the peoples of these countries, because, in all honesty, nothing happened and will not happen in eastern europe for the next few centuries, nothing happened in western europe except for demonstrations. in connection with the increase in prices for a-a, one one euro, means for gasoline and so on. i mean, that's their problem. they were never ready and will not be ready for a direct collision in the event that it occurs, i don’t know where in the suvorov corridor on svalbard, but on the island snake. it does not matter. the important thing is that we are stronger than them. a priori, you understand a priori stronger, because we have a fighting spirit, but they do not have it. they have morale in france for 40 days. it was enough to resist the germans, but we defeated them and came to berlin. and if necessary, this is important to understand in our creative intelligentsia, which still sits with its hands clenched in one place. so, if necessary, we

can repeat, and who doubts, i still, well, so on the margins of our discussion in small print. e , not for discussion, i note that after all, when we defeated them in the forty, fifth year, arriving in berlin , it was a little different we who existed in our own socio-economic reality, which was all aimed at one thing and this one was in many ways a confrontation with them, and the current we are topics that for 30 years, with all possible efforts, they tried to fit in in some places. we managed to build it quite strongly into them and, moreover, it is built not only on the external contours, but also on the internal contrast. and they, pyotr olegovich, do n't know this very well in londo. we'll line up from everywhere where did you fit in? and all those who have been integrated, all of them, in fact, will either change their attitude to life, or, uh, will go into reforms. there to testify god willing. god that they will be the main thing, but this is still a question of what they are made of

. they come out when they develop all this rhetoric, so to speak, well, they develop and continue, they proceed from the idea that pyotr olegovich is now broadcasting about us or they have some other, how wrong they are about us, based on this idea, what they are now crush them and collapse or how fair our assumptions are that they will not be solved. let's be honest 5 months ago. it would never have occurred to anyone that they would decide to supply there in such quantities, and howitzers artillery and cover the whole thing with reconnaissance satellites. in fact, they are at war with us. to what extent is this happening now, therefore, when you say that they are with us, they will not, they will not leave their comfort zone for them, as human values, the value of their own navel is more important than their life, more important, you know, these are germans poles. these are french. these are italians. it's an amicable mentality absolutely, true really.

jealous and another that the same georgian said that and we will never go into conflict with them, because they have already dissolved us, because there are daughters there, granddaughters there, that means sons and that's it. this is this and this is the main question. how realistic we imagine their readiness to go to escalation, and they are our ability - this aggravation to win. it seems to me that in this sense the realism of both sides is correctly assessed, it is very important that we move on like this speak. yes, who are they aggravation is to take off the shirts. yes, you quickly, it seems to me, ah, to present their view of the world of assessment, but it is necessary to look at the alignment of forces with their position. and when you look at the alignment of forces of psycho positions. it seems to me that the point of view is closer to yours artyom than to the point of view of peter olegovich with all due respect, because if we talk about historical analogies. and yes, when we took berlin in the forty-fifth year, it

was a slightly different country, it was a very different strong one, it became different and the linguist came to us adversary. that is, therefore, elected with all due respect. yes, yes, we won, or not, and not so much. it was a different country and ukraine then fought for us, and the alignment of villages was not against us, so this, of course, very effectively says that we will defeat everyone here, no one is ready to die. yes, we are not ready to clean either. these young handsome men also do not really want to die. here are people like pyotr olegovich, yes, otherwise, they probably were at the forefront. they were standing here, therefore, well, let's not be here, but to dissemble very much nobody wants to die. nobody wants a world war, so there will be clashes here, yes, and at the economic geopolitical level, where we had our trump cards, unlike, for example, the markov situation, when, well, when we

retreated from kiev in march in april, but it seemed more worrisome. general international situation. now , somehow, it has leveled off and drawn conclusions from what, let's say, cautiously, some in the west consider our mistakes militarily. now even they recognize companies are held more competently without a cap zakidalsky moods. we need to avoid these attitudes. we need to be honest, including with our actual and other moods should be avoided. here are these. that's where we fished there the whole world is there all the power, there are iron eggs, and everything else, like. and where do we agree, and agree- artyom actually, well, already, uh, five stages exist? yes, this is the stage of acceptance, what is it, right? this is new life, who agreed, then february happened. consent is our country. she is not more affected by petra olegovich

than mine and us together here to live and die here for everyone. moreover, i don’t think that pyotr alekseevich will leave to die in france, therefore, we will think about how to get out of this, but it is desirable, after all, without a world war. and without these moods here, that now we would be on a snake fucking, either svalbard, or the country agrees, although people, do they want us to have this conversation? we will return to it and yes , i will allow myself one short comment, since maxim decided to talk about why i am not at the front, why i am in france i’m going to die, that means, maxim, i want to tell you one thing, that yes, we have one country and we have one people , but those people who are trying today, as you imagined, close their eyes and say that there is no war. that maybe it will be some kind of geopolitics or maybe they will put pressure on us economic and so on. it's all extreme. excuse me war. you yourself ban. this ignore, the war is already on. she's already on her way. it has already happened. everything back on the way will not be impossible to put the paste back into the tube, so i'm not therefore any

humanities about the fact that we take there, we don’t take kiev, odessa and so on, why throw this hat? it is just the absence of such a mood that is our typical, liberal intelligentsia. that's the difficulty when a person tries to close his eyes and say, it's okay. we will sit out now everything will pass and everything. before, it will not be like this before, but the presence of a hat of zakidai moods. and this is exactly what led our country to defeat in those few wars that it played crimean war russo-japanese war. here, i am categorically against the throwing hat, that is, when we defended moscow and they said that we would reach berlin and it was a hat, throwing moods. we russians howl to the end, how to negotiate it will come. here at this point there is fairness. in

these e, what is called the alarmist? eh, you don't need to get carried away in these words. i'm right here. you took it off my tongue, you understand, when in the forty- first year they wrote to berlin, this could also be formally called a cap of a captive mood and some, so to speak, a person who talks about surpluses about costs, and so on, he could say. are you fools, or something, you have germans near moscow, what kind of berlin do you really need to roll back to the urals, and therefore this is also important and necessary. i absolutely agree with this, but also to realistically assess what, maybe and what your opponent is ready for. and what are you ready for. you are also important. and in this sense, it is very significant for me about how they understand and what they understand, but yesterday they already discussed it, but i still want to today. show here is the schulz who one of the most powerful countries. economically, in this very alliance, which is going to strangle us economically, that is, it seems to think that they

can do anything. and we, as if no one asked this scholz yesterday, uh, mr. scholz. and what about e, here are the guarantees to ukraine a. now not even a word. listen for facial expressions and gestures. watch your hands. as they say very revealing, please. mr. chancellor, the g7 promised security guarantees to ukraine after the war. could you specify what kind of guarantee this is, yes? it everything. stand-up is a great standard person without saying anything, in fact. he said everything, and this suggests that many of them have these moods, that guys, let's also not be driven too much . and now the question is their mood, our mood, their idea of ​​the prospects, our ideas, where we, in short, are they still naked

kings or are they dangerous enemies who can aggravate seriously and not in words. i'll start with your phrase a few minutes ago. why, uh, six months ago, we could not have thought that they would start supply. uh, weapons to ukraine in such volumes of such intelligence information, but let's remember the first uh, weeks uh, of the conflict, when the zelensky company constantly demanded, give us weapons. give us weapons. let's get cold. and then they all refused, then i don’t do it here, i’m from the couch. i don't draw any conclusions. i'm just building chronologies from the couch. all done here, then. our first gesture. good will. the end of march, istanbul e, the departure from the kiev bridgeheads after him, the departure from chernigov from under the sums and

north of the kharkov region. and after that, this can be assessed in different ways, that is, maxim is obviously right here in many respects, but about the hatred of the first political goals, that zelensky did not give up in 72 hours, the scoundrel, but did not give up. but a military coup did not happen, at the same time pyotr olegovich is absolutely right that we need to concentrate tasks on e, the donbass direction, which we are doing now and doing it quite successfully, but again chronologically from the couch. here, after we left the kiev bridgehead, their positions, and according to armament of ukraine became tougher and just began to change. but why did i say in the last part that not only our patriots, but also our enemies perceived the withdrawal from kiev as a weakness of russia uh- huh and after that they began to

arm more and more actively first there cannons, then tanks. uh, then there's the latest rszo anti-ship missiles. also, by the way, the factor necessary for the snake is considerable, yes, and so on, and, accordingly, at the same time, he fully understands what maxim was talking about. god forbid nuclear war, yes, a let's agree that in the current conflict arranged a configuration that from the twenty- fourth e, or at least from the end of march to e, today, but the nuclear factor. no, in general, you don’t think it’s on the table, it’s not on the table in this configuration, that is, uh, russia is at war. uh, with ukraine at the same time with everything western, pyotr olegovich is right. a. well, about the same as we fought . let's say in chechnya uh-huh, that is, where nuclear weapons do not provide for, that is, the nuclear factor is not on the table today with current configuration. although have with 24 february. let 's be honest, it's been on the table since february 24,

because it was said that someone would try to stop us. so this is all true at the same time, and from the sofa to the question that this is not on the table, right here on the table there is and on the battlefield no from the sofa, i can conclude that starting from the morning of february 24 to this day, russia has not struck a single center for making political and military-political decisions in ukraine yeah, we agree with this and in these contexts, when the war came down to the usual artillery and slightly aviation war a la the 20th century, and our enemies and ukrainians, and these all taking off or not taking off their jackets, in my opinion. could draw the following conclusion to fight with russia. can you exactly? uh-huh

and here this conclusion is strong enough. it changes in my opinion. uh, since their alignment, uh, and their views on the world, their worldview, because up to 24 it changes for us dangerous, because they believe that we do not use nuclear weapons at the centers, we will neglect and we will not apply and will not apply at the decision-making center we don’t strike and we don’t strike, but we talk all the time, while we have been talking a lot and menacingly since the twenty-fourth of february, but we don’t do it in this context. i'm talking only about the decision-making center. and why doesn't it? after all, they don’t strike either, yes, and they don’t stop at our large cities, and no one can pay for our maxim, you ask everyone not to interrupt. i will end with one phrase that the one, fleur, that it

is better not to mess with russia at all, has disappeared. oh, this is actually an important story, because there is already a kind of second plan. and about the fact that this fleur somehow said that he was better off not messing with russia. it can start to seem a little bit to someone that he disappeared here, this is the situation around lithuania, kaliningrad, and so on. i am sure that this is an attempt to test the water on another bridgehead. we will talk about this right after the advertisement. but just now we were just saying, vlad shurygin at the beginning that we do not show the prisoners and so on and so forth. right now we have literally appeared, in the course of our program we have the first footage of the prisoners. and as far as i understand, all the prisoners that you now see are citizens of the dpr, the very ones who were received in the plan. uh, during yesterday's. e hmm exchanges. these are the people who returned from there, repeating this, the citizens of the dpr. and i think that they are showing us.

mostly those who are well, more or less safe and sound, but in any case, for the sake of justice, here are our shots for you and this is very happy. we will show the news that our people returned home from captivity as new personnel arrive. new frames. we deliver ozone with love today, up to 50% discounts on beauty and hygiene products iberica olives and olives with a discount of 50% with an mts bank card, very cool cashback. i just don't need anything right now. apply for an mts bank card and an mts premium subscription, we get a super 5% cashback on the most popular categories. the perfect combination

of ice cream wafers and chocolate pure line, please your and loved ones taste buds eight sale. this is your luck. these are purchases at a discount, while everything in the country is discounted and eight to fifty percent eight. rest and fly all hotels on ozone choose the benefits get for hotels in cashback, return a large selection of hotels on ozone and cashback up to 10 percent. look at me, now i'm in an advertisement for

gloria jeans super son on a t-shirt from 199 rubles write gloria jeans give the old equipment and get a discount on the new haier split systems for 20 - 1.99 rubles. eldorado is all for low prices, this is an advertisement for vtb and it's time to talk about cleanliness. there are things that will not disappear anywhere, our experience accumulated over decades, which helped us become stronger and survive all crises 1.300 branches across the country with real professionals who are ready to help in real life, and not just in advertising government support and the trust of tens of millions of customers. everything, this remains unchanged, as well as our responsibility to you. that is why everything will be fine with your money, as well as with the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the ability to

support loved ones at the most necessary moment. go to vtb and everything will work out. ozone delivering with love today bushido coffee beans at a discount 50 percent and drinking water holy spring for 32 rubles. dim and i'm here at mts bank you're your own here, well help me there so as not to wait thank you man. refueled me such a cashback came. sasha is enough. thank you

for everything you have done for me friend. mts to you friend sasha use the mts bank card and mts premium subscription and you get a super cashback for the most popular categories of 5 percent at lukoil gas stations, supermarkets, cafes and grocery delivery. program time will tell, we continue to discuss live what we are with you in the broadest sense of the word to us people living on the planet. earth what can we expect from uh. it is possible that such a change occurred in the western chapters that professor of drums. he indicated before the advertisement with the phrase that some of them had lost fleur's perception of us that it was better not to mess with russia. well, or better not to fight. and,

although of course, in different parts. eh, sveta has a different view of this fleur or the conclusions they draw from this fluoro. here, for example, now we will be transferred to the big map. here are these, as it were, here we are, in fact, this is all, this is so clear. what's going on here. and they are watching, well, under the influence of that, they are watching, including here and here about what we all can expect and how this configuration can develop here is the global times newspaper and the global times is an english-language newspaper that writes about. well, so to speak, things that are still agreed, as i understand it with the management. e communist party of the people's republic of china that is it? well, it's almost like official position, although, as it were in the newspaper, this is how they imagine from there the possible development of events here concerning us, please. the nato plan for the defense of the baltic region, which

is one of the possible regions for the spread of the conflict, is not yet ready. lithuania , latvia and estonia have repeatedly called on the leadership of the alliance to update the strategy for protecting the region and strengthen its defense capability, but nato attaches more importance to the interests of its twelve founding members, so it is quite possible that nato could sacrifice three the baltic countries to protect the founding members in western europe, you understand how interestingly the outlook on the prospects of the situation changes depending on where you look from. pay attention to the title of the article nato demonstrates demonstrates unity against the backdrop of a deep split and the depth of the split chinese newspaper assessed to such an extent that it is possible, the configuration in which the 12 founding countries will hand over, for example, a trinket, to whom they will be handed over, they do not write, but to whom else can hand over the baltic states, except for those about which fleur i don’t know and perhaps it is the look, and the chinese can be

applied to the situation. well, you know that lithuania very cheerfully stated that it is stopping the transit, even though it cannot stop this transit that it is a transit from russia to russia which has nothing to do with lithuania and it must be carried out because on this basis, russia recognized the independence of this very lithuania, maybe in vain, because the time has come to deceive. it was only a matter of time, but lithuanians nonetheless. so for this about eripenitsya. although a, as reuters writes. and perhaps, perhaps, literally one of these days, but some kind of hmm will appear, so to speak. well, let's put it this way. uh, some conditions for the resumption of this transit. i don't know why it doesn't show for me now. rotor with , in theory, should have been shown. ku-ku, do you hear anything? oh look, listen. that's how it happens, it's interesting to start talking, and there are people. yes , it means that transit to kaliningrad through lithuania can return to normal modes within a few days, brussels was informed, and so on.

now the question arises that lithuania lithuania is so cheerful, i would say so diplomatically. and although i would replace one letter, here d would say yes to z, here, well, nevertheless, the greyhound behaves so cheerfully. it is not a fact that for some reason she is behaving on persuasion, and not on her own, because, as it were, the european commission. there is a feeling that the lithuanians are trying to destroy it all the time, eri. foaming the question arises. why are they suddenly frothing against their elders, and here we are listening to the sitting president of lithuania perhaps they ate foam after reading the chinese article. o that they can. if anything, hand over, as already once sold. how much is there? i don’t remember they sold all of this livland, shmurland, and so on. listen. regions need military on earth. we can no longer depend on the alliance's commitment to send additional forces. even after the start of the

conflict. there is a threat that russian and belarusian forces will block the allies' movement into the region through the suwalki corridor. this is a corridor that russia can use geopolitically and strategically, we must close it before just a strong forward presence opa opa. and now the corral turns out to be interesting. that is, i’m not talking, but the chinese say that, in fact, this is a bargaining card, which, if anything, can be thrown off in the game, and then we intensively begin some rather active body movements, creating problems. and then he speaks correctly. come on, the military to us. send more, it's interesting to squiggle. yes, peter is easier. well , the fact is that the baltic countries are such the most biting nato bugs, and they do not rush slowly, as soon as even they even have commands. they are already rushing to bite, but the problem is that you understand, artyom and as one e, an outstanding

artist, a fly sitting on a large horse, she always imagines herself as a rider, but she is not a rider like that, but the territory of the three baltic states. but basically, it's bullshit. it also flies pretty fast. and there is no need to explain how fast the armed forces are passing, they will not even have time. eh, have lunch. as for, uh, their fears, they only speculate on them, because the population there remained like here, well, in my constituency, as in maryino, therefore, it seems to me that with lithuania, marina can be put forward as a diplomatic interlocutor, russia should not be too big. here, ambassador maryana went to maryino in lithuania, are you an ambassador to maryino, is everything there or there on fukushita? yes? somehow, yes, to make friendship stronger. okay now, but in fact, of course, this is eternal. uh, the baltic theme of speculation. uh, it means

the occupation of russia that we are being occupied all the time, and we endure it all the time with joy we meet all the time we see off, so to speak, sad raymond pauls and all that and in fact yes, very, of course, their sad fate is geopolitically unlucky for them to be such vicious russophobes. right on the border with russia well, it's not lucky what you do as long as we tolerate them, i see well, so after all, from the point of view of this, but the assumption is not even in the chinese newspaper, but the possible development of the configuration of events here, because i , to be honest, when i read the chinese newspaper, i think, well, the idea is interesting, but technically technical. i am i don't imagine it. how is it technically that nato can throw off part of the countries, i won’t throw it into myself, because as soon as nato throws off part of the country , it gives them to someone. it must cease to exist. however, some believe that this is where the matter goes in the reformulation. nato on

something else, as if there was an auks. well, and so on and so forth. as far as all this is generally real, the chinese are here. it is clear that the chinese are also exaggerating very angry. e for the last. ah, several thousand years. yes no for the last few days then there are, they accumulated the strength of the hut for 5,000 years. but now they are angry, because, starting from february 24. china behaved, if you look at it with western eyes as quietly as possible. china is not something that did not open a second front against taiwan yes, but china, in general, and from countries not in the west, in general, takes. well, let's say, honestly, not the most open position towards russia today. yes , metaphorically criticizing for actually criticizing something, but now chinese companies are leaving russia and observing sanctions, let's say, india open much more, but for russia now on one or another deal, than china and that's what pissed them off, although they tried to sit still, quietly

tried that, uh, so that they would not be covered. with this wave, yes, from the west, a and, a, all economic goodies. uh, they got pissed off at the fact that they were started directly, uh, offended first at the g-7 summit and then uh, at the summit it is necessary, therefore, and says that you decide. friends you are either with us or with them. yes yes. but no. it's uh g7 yes, you said you determined you there you come on nada. on putin i yesterday we discussed this with toltenberg. he said we were worried that china did not support at all. ah, but she is in this strategy, where russia is a direct threat. uh, also said that china causes, ah, ah concern or concern. and those who cause concern are already, in general, not friends, but the essence of the fact is that the chinese have now begun to put pressure on them, if we rationalize this behavior. uh, lithuania yes, on kaliningrad transit, again, i ’m arguing from the sofa, you don’t know the situation somewhere, a

the fourth package of sanctions is where all these goods were introduced under sanctions. uh, how did lithuania close- closed was adopted at the end of april? uh -huh lithuania for some reason, yes, but announced the termination of transit not at the end of april, but 2 weeks before this nato summit, which suggests that lithuania began to bargain right under it under it, so that there would be more troops, but more troops means more military supplies. this means more bargaining at the nato summit, as if with the eu yes, everyone has already begun to talk, yes suvorovsky corridor. yes, the second front yes, a direct clash between russia and nato yes, and so on and so on, of course. at the nato summit, staltenberg also said that they would expand their presence there, yes, yes, there putin will get more nato hoo hoo, that is, from the point of view of taking a point there is such a diplomatic term. yes, and the lithuanians worked with a bang. yeah. and

the only question is, what really, uh, in brussels understands that this conflict is a transit. they don’t need to try some additional protocols to prescribe the lithuanians to calm down, but will it work or not? e question is different, but again, in conclusion, i will allow. uh-huh give a forecast from the couch. here is what i said that it is possible to fight with russia in an ordinary artillery slightly aviation war and if they wear this particular concept, that they understand that the artillery war begins in the zasuvalka corridor, without mutual strikes on decision -making centers without god forbid the nuclear factor, nationally then, why not fight yeah, that is, you want to say they can paint over too much, oh, just based on the experience of ukraine four months. that is, such an idea may be, and how do you look? maxim on these same ones. look, really, and about this trade and

really, what is it to e to nato, let's listen to scholz, please. as for the issue of kaliningrad, the european union sets certain limits here. i see that all parties are trying to set the dynamics of discolation. at least. this is my observation. i have a feeling that scholz admits that the lithuanians are not putting pressure on us with this transit, but they are being put under pressure with they are bargaining for something, the only question is whether it is for money or it is for creating conflicts in which they can try a little. what will this eventually lead to, that is, the news of the last two days indicates that there will be a compromise, and the europeans are absolutely not satisfied with this one, and the provocative maximalism of lithuania and even the president’s statement. to sit down. we are the same here, but, as it were, there was a military statement, and then somewhere so political and somewhere even already pacifying

said. well, the european union will decide. yes, therefore. in general, they are not interested. here in addition, the european commission is tense yes, the european commission, and the european commission - who is this? this is still the opinion of key countries and, thank god, old european non-poles. that is, you are saying that in this situation the european commission is putting pressure on lithuania and will not let it create a source of military tension here. yes, i’ve already added it, in fact, because it’s already clear from well it’s already been made clear what will happen, and the european commission’s clarification that this, and in this, their fourth package of sanctions does not apply to kaliningrad transit, because it is a move to comply where it goes to comply will comply. i do not believe in the military development of events on the one hand. europe doesn’t need nato, but we don’t have. we are too bogged down on the ukrainian front with this force and

imagine that now we will start in the suvalka corridor somewhere and some additional troops in the water, this is also with lukashenka . we will call on the creative intelligentsia from facebook and go normally, time will tell. this is the bank's security service. tell me the code from the card. you first offer medical services. you are at the right place, i constantly hear voices on the tinkoff.ru website and get the most effective protection against spam and the tinko machine. he is so alone when it hurts, somewhere here it acts selectively on the battle spasm and violation of the neobutin stool, when it hurts somewhere in the investment, the signals can be incomprehensible or deceptively simple and it seems that the danger is always somewhere nearby, but with a reliable partner

market change. or part of your strategy is a reliable partner for your investment. you don't pay twice. you don't pay twice. i'm not crying, twice. i have a wink video service wing that combines an online cinema and interactive tv in a profitable way. watch pete on any rostelecom technology devices. super prices for a dress from 399 rubles. hurry gloria jeans i'm in a club where millions of women already know how to control varicose veins. detralex works at any stage of varicose veins and affects the cause of edema in severity and more from the inside. detralex on the mts

bank card, very cool cashbacks. he beeped, i just don't need anything right now. apply for an mts bank card and an mts premium subscription, we get a super cashback of 5% for the most popular categories, i will have time to issue a tinkoff black card before june 30 and get free service forever tinkoff he is such a new holy spring. it seems to me that in order to

get a discount, we have become one group; now we don’t have a single tariff package. tele2 has different rules, without changing the personal tariff, everyone receives a discount to the group, even if you are from different cities, each of you will receive up to 15 percent discount and your connections will become even more profitable. join a group and get discounts from tele2 women in case of severity swelling and pain in the legs help reduce the symptoms of varicose veins in a novelty form. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with a loan from sovcombank make important purchases at today's prices and turn all your plans back on sovcombank people are more important this is the bank's security service.

tell me the code from the card. first you offer medical services. you are at the right place, i constantly hear voices on the tinkoff.ru website and get the most effective anti-spam machine protection, tinko. he is so alone. well, strange, perhaps, for the end of the phrase program, but in fact, you know, it turns out that everything that we discussed here with you. here is about the fate of mankind, about the development of this conflict, about who will take this all garbage, because in fact the most important fateful decision will be made tomorrow, a decision that concerns the fate of ukraine and whether they will still defeat russia or not. and well, as they say, whose will take? i think that tomorrow all progressive humanity should freeze in front of

their screens and watch what happens in the un and not just out, but in unesco, because tomorrow the first deputy minister of foreign affairs of ukraine informed us about this last decisive battle. listen. consideration of the ukrainian dossier will take place on july 1 in paris during an extraordinary meeting of the committee of the intangible cultural heritage, at which the final decision should be made on the inclusion of our ukrainian element of the culture of preparing ukrainian borscht in the unesco list of intangible cultural heritage requiring urgent protection. you understand when they ban, and we have borscht banned. listen, it's banned. they are not afraid of compensation yet, they will demand reparations. hopefully ukrainian songs. friends, do you understand? this is, in fact, this is what we are talking about, and many of them are surprised. why are you setting them to failstate? because when in the country at the level of the first deputy minister of foreign affairs, can be

discussed? that's it, forgive me chukhun. which it is clear how it will end, well, you can guess who will be awarded the borscht, about the same who was awarded the victory in eurovision, which is just as true, then they took it away and the british will go there with borscht , it will be the same, they will be thrown even with this. although it’s more like borscht, how will they take it from us. i'm talking about the device of consciousness, and here is such a device of consciousness, sometimes trouble and leads the information channel on the first program continues its broadcast. time will tell whether we are working live or now the most important direction at the moment, footage from military correspondents is already appearing on social networks, as the allied forces are moving towards lysichansk. today we had andrey marochka live. he confirmed that at the moment, the territory of the largest

oil refinery in ukraine, lisichansk, has completely come under the control of the allied forces, and the assistant to the minister of internal affairs of the luhansk people's republic, vitaly ty kiselyov vitaly viktorovich, is in direct contact with us now. hello , please comment to us on the statement that from the lisichanskaya oil refinery under our control. how important is this object and most importantly, what's next. ruslan good afternoon, of course, the refinery is the highest point, with which it is good such cities as severodonetsk rubizhnoye and all the outskirts of lisichansk in general are observed. therefore, the occupation of the main line by our units was carried out in full, the enemy was knocked out. even though he fought hard. well, it’s clear that he needed to leave the fierce one from lisichansk, uh, and run away, uh, along with the mercenaries, so they held back the onslaught of our units, just in this direction, after all. uh, just the refinery was for them. uh, very uh, very very large

fortified area and which was supposed to hold, in in principle, how to control those early cities that they abandoned and fled, in which we knocked them out. this is rubizhnoye severodonetsk. this is the main thing, therefore, our troops have not only already passed through. e refinery has already passed and ended with a cleansing of a large number of weapons and grenades were thrown. it's just that their positions have a large number of casualties on their side of the loss. of course, they suffered the most colossal ones in the lysychansk direction, as from the south side. so here is the north side, where the refinery is now located, our control is approximately somewhere around 50% already lisichansk itself is our vitamins to emphasize separately, because there is a lot of conflicting information about, uh, how much we controlled now, according to some information. we

are on the outskirts of the city, according to some information, the fighting is on the outskirts of the city, but in the morning rodion miroshnik, the ambassador of the lugansk people's republic in russia, said that the city controls us by 50%. today this direct question was asked to andrey by a marochka. he smiled, of course. he says, i am a military man, i have no right to reveal everything, but, as it were, in unlike civilians you are now talking about. percentage under our control is already reliable information. of course, this is reliable information. we control the city of the north and from the south side uh also from the west side set aside from the east side and our units crashed into the city and crashed directly into the already residential developments. the enemy is definitely fleeing and the fact that in the coming days we will see this will happen as we previously predicted that the liberation of lisichansk is already a matter of days, but ahead we will have many, many more. there will be many more battles that the enemy will be in the

future from other cities. inflict rocket artillery strikes directly on lysychansk, as was the case with other cities, which they threw and believed that it was no longer and did not leave stone on stone in this way, in the morning the ukrainian media gave information that the general staff of ukraine gave the command to retreat. if now there are troops, but we seem to have information that they have cut off all the paths for retreat. here you can somehow to comment on whether they are running and in which direction they are running, but we had information on the 26th-27th that six armored personnel carriers entered the seversk area, one of these infantry carriers. i didn’t know at that time, but in this context i understood that he would be sent to the area of ​​north uh lisichansk in order to uh, the neck that was left through it , uh, the sushniks would come out. and uh, those remnants of mercenaries who were still in lisichansk are the same

story as severodonetsk beh methodical, therefore. uh, that's the uh task they, well at principle, they implement a methodical retreat to new positions for themselves. we fulfilled it, unfortunately, i say again, we do not completely control the entire perimeter of lisichansk, but i can say with confidence that already half of it is almost or is now directly under our control. and this is, uh, i know from, uh, our radio intercepts. i know this from our intelligence and that our units are crashing faster and faster every minute and the process of liberation is underway. eh, i say that with complete certainty. and now i would like more to demonstrate that the ammunition that is there is the production of the entire nato bloc. here i have it in my hands. this is a german grenade. well, this is a german grenade. uh, fragmentation

offensive defensive. uh, this is the part that goes to the middle one. this is immediately offensive. and when she is here in the complex she is defensively issued. they are these grenades. this model is this model. uh, a german company for norway, so norway supplies directly to ukraine, we see this obviously this is an american simple fragmentation grenade. and this is also confirmed by the fact that a large number of mercenaries, just from the side of america, are participating in the territory of donbass, this is one of the small, but very insidious minus 60. good production in poland. with arsenal, this is vitaly and that's it. moreover, everything is new, so we very carefully checked all the copies that i have

just shown you. uh, they will certainly go for examination to ours in order to confirm , uh, from which side? how many about what supplies them? well, in all likelihood. here are the satellites, under the guise of what america supplies, they still supply their weapons. although he never talked about it. essentially exclusive information. thank you very much vitaly viktorovich kiselyov, assistant minister of the interior of the lugansk people's republic, with confirmation of the information that appeared on some tapes in the morning. news agency 50% of the city of lisichansk is already under our control. this is extremely important with the demonstration of the trophy there were no official deliveries of weapons from countries that, it seems, were not supposed to supply weapons , but, nevertheless, as they say, the evidence is in the face. dima, i'm here at mts bank. you're your own here. help me there, so as not to wait. thank you man refueled me such a

cashback came. sasha is enough. good deeds love silence dim but again cashback. but at first i thought you didn't like me much. no, sasha , at first i didn't like you less. thanks for nothing. thank you for everything you have done for me friend. mts to you friend sasha mts premium you get a super cashback on the most popular categories of 5% at lukoil gas stations, supermarkets, cafes and grocery delivery. i will have time to get a tinkoff black card before june 30 and get free service forever

tinkoff he is such a new holy source of fruity berry pleasure. how does deliciousness love for taste? the right choice of millions of women with severity of swelling and pain in the legs special flavonoids in the composition of the drug help to reduce the symptoms of varicose veins new venarus gel from the popular venarus venotonic it seems that in order to get a discount, we of the old group of one we now have no single tariff package . tele2 has different rules, without changing the personal tariff

, everyone gets a discount to join the group, even if you are from different cities, each of you will receive up to 15% discount and your connection will become even more profitable. join groups and get discounts from tele2 look at me, now i'm in an advertisement for gloria jeans super son on a t-shirt from 199 rubles. in gloria jeans, we have a new addition to the blackhead family blackhead cola. this is an advertisement for vtb and it's time to speak frankly. there are things that will not go away our experience accumulated over decades, which helped us become stronger and survive all crises 1.300 branches across the country with real professionals who are ready to help in real life, and not just in advertising,

government support and the trust of tens of millions of customers. everything, this remains unchanged, as well as our responsibility to you. that's why your money will be fine, just like the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the opportunity to support loved ones the most southern moment. go to vtb and everything will work out. when neobutin hurts somewhere here, it acts selectively on pain, spasm and violation of the neobutin stool, when it hurts somewhere here it is the bank's security service. tell me the code from the card. first you offer medical services. you are at the right place, i constantly hear voices on the tinkoff.ru website and get the most effective protection against spam for the tinkoff machine, it is one of a kind. program time will tell, we continue our work and we have

direct communication from gorlovka war correspondent, georgy medvedev georgy hello how is the shelling situation, as i understand it, continue. hello, the shelling continues. so, the situation, as it was extremely difficult, remains to communicate with local residents, we observe what is happening in the city, such a moment, uh, people admit that as soon as at least for a minute it comes. silence. they have hope inside. it is constantly that right now you have to keep this silence, but unfortunately not, and barely could to get out of the basement, without a shelter for the inhabitants of the village of golmovsky on the outskirts of gorlovka, as a massive artillery strike was inflicted in several other directions at once. and here in the city. unfortunately, there is already confirmed information that several houses were destroyed about at least one wounded civilian. and the same situation is observed, in principle, throughout the territory of the

donetsk people's republic, these are the outskirts. donetsk there and at night there were serious attacks and two people were injured. now arriving information about new damage. well, ah, lucid, and in the ukrainian segment, but social networks. ah. such peppy reports were that some kind of military installations were destroyed there. we had an effect on the eve of the broadcast, and we tried to find out with the local residents. listen, after all, for the military facilities in the center, that is, the guilty people told her directly that she got into apartment buildings , but in the private sector. uh, in particular, here is the girl with whom we communicated sent a photo, and a huge oskol like that almost hit her, she miraculously escaped death, because she flew in at the level of her head and there is information that a child born in 2010, a twelve-year-old boy, was injured,

this is already a, which is a victim only during this week and only for a s moment of escalation. here i did. look at the statistics. uh, over 2,500 civilians were injured. these are the military facilities that, apparently, the most important military facility in the dpr - this is also in the lpr - these are people, people who will not accept this regime. uh, george what tools? to date, the most active use by the ukrainian side is recorded 152-millimeter gunner twenty-two, as well as multiple launch rocket systems grenades. literally just now, but they briefly used it in the commodity area, and in the settlement of verkhnyaya toretskaya. well, also the missiles are more serious, which the ukrainian army regularly releases. and now also, probably, the whole republic, all the filovs, including the districts, hear the

active work of the air defense of the dpr, this is just the army, the republic is fighting with these air targets, judging by this information, nato supplies ran out somehow quickly. thank you very much georgy medvedev with the latest news from gorlovka and from. switching to the north, donetsk aleksandra reka war correspondent of the news-front edition ourselves on direct communication aleksandr hello where are you? good afternoon, i am near severodonetsk, finally, our local mobile communications have launched a tower here. and now i can go live with you. what's the news severodonetsk has been completely liberated, but there is still a lot of work to restore, which the locals say, and 50% of lisichansk is already under our control. this was confirmed to us today, and the official representatives, what do you know about this? yes, i don’t know about 50%, but i can say that the fighting is already approaching the city center. uh, the servicemen of

the lpr and the russian federation are already advancing from several directions from the south and crossing the river from the east. seversky donets and now there already m-m say. so the return fire is less and less. this suggests that the armed forces of ukraine who are still there. uh, in fact, the carriage and the moment when it will be possible to say, severodonetsk lisichanskaya, yes, and the entire luhansk people's republic, have already been liberated very, very close due to the fact that you are there, because the background, as it were, raises questions. and you still keep the intrigue. what's this? this, unfortunately, this school is the village of smolyaninovo, a few kilometers from severodonetsk by its shelling. just a few months ago. it was destroyed, but oddly enough, there is internet here so i can uh convey the most advanced information to e. here is the front.

now just was severodonetsk city finally breathed a sigh of relief. eh, they are already talking, the residents are happy to say that the second day there is almost no shooting. oh, of course, there are lysichansk battles. it is only a few kilometers from severodonetsk, but for ukraine, more precisely, the armed forces of ukraine who are there. uh, there's nothing to fire at, severodonetsk, because the artillery is suppressed. they still have mortars, but they are afraid to shoot them, because the city is already surrounded, and fighting from all sides and give out their positions. they no longer want to. moreover, leaving severodonetsk now there has been approximately a lull, uh, in the direction of lisichansk, perhaps some negotiations are already underway, but i can’t say more about this, but interesting information about the lull, we will check and find out alexander recorder with us in direct contact from near severodonetsk the landscape, of course, against its background,

this school, which was shelled, is impressive, but today we receive important news from france adamovich firstly, 50%, uh, lysychanska, under our control. secondly, here alexander reka said that at the current moment, what time it is 15:15 about 15-20 there is a lull, respectively, suggests that negotiations are underway related to a possible surrender hmm hmm well, such a process on the part of the armed forces he is dangerous to russia. only which is cultivating, which is now promoting nato at the nato summit, which is currently taking place in madrid. and in russia, in fact , they have sentenced russia - this is the main topic. russia main threat. now this is officially enshrined in the alliance's new strategic concept approved yesterday, and this is what vladimir putin replied to all this. we should treat this as, uh, hmm, as the fact that they have been

preparing for some kind of active actions against us since the fourteenth year. us is not exactly news. uh, that explains our determined actions to protect our own interests. they e for a long time they needed some kind of external enemy such, around, which could be, uh, around. i am a threat which could unite allies around itself. i say, first of all, about the state. well, iran was not very suitable for this role. russia fit better. we gave them such a chance to unite all the allies around us on a new historical rifle. well, there is nothing new for us. and this once again confirms what we have been talking about all the time, namely, that the nato bloc is a rudiment, a past era of the cold war era. we are constantly on this, that they answered that nato has changed, that it is now, most likely,

political union but everyone was looking for a pretext and opportunity, but to give it a new impetus precisely. eh, just like military organizations. well, please, they do it. there is nothing new for us here. i will forgive your attention that, after all, jens stoltenberg officially admitted at the nato summit in madrid that they had been preparing to confront the entire atlantic alliance with russia since 2014, and also stoltenberg. today he said that the protocol on the accession of sweden and finland to the north atlantic alliance will be signed on tuesday, july 5, everything is very fast. everything very quickly direction absolutely. the only thing is clear. i categorically disagree with the term olesya sentence, you understand? a sentence is something you can enforce, but for now they're a sentence, yeah, you know? what's the matter? for example, i can’t, i don’t know, conditionally, yes, to pass a sentence on anyone, because he doesn’t have the strength, the impossibility, or the cut to carry it out, so this is a kind of concept, this is a kind of decision. well, it's certainly not a sentence. i

think this is fundamental. no one can bring. you can't bear. if there is pressure, you won't be able to. that's different. would you like another question? let me take it out now. here's trust to me. i'll take it. here there is distrust baidu. no delivered. and then nothing ringing adequacy just yes, well, of course, i say little to pass judgment. understand what's the matter, otherwise it 's worth nothing. he is a puff. he is zero, he is zero, but better, but this is not like that. well, check. yes, it is also quite dangerous, but nevertheless, michael and what do you think, but already, if we are talking about the verdict correctly, it’s not the verdict, so to speak, is the new strategic one. so to say, the line against russia is either not new, or it has been all these years and we can either illustrate it quite convincingly, however, an interesting point of view, or is it just a continuation of the old one, which was not so effectively articulated before, but now it is articulated quite effectively, but the line. yes, it’s even clear that the concept is

new, because the old concept of russia called russia strategic partners. this is of course, and how like after a particle of the year, but this is it it is unacceptable that in uh, the strategic concept of nato russia strategic complexes of western politicians in our partners, let them change with a smile ah. there is only one task, the most important one is holding back russia from this current aggression, and nato's functions are to protect its members from external aggression. this is what we are aware of. yes, and it seems to me that we need to cope with this, and russia says that we are not going to, but to lead our troops on members of this. well, not really. a confident in this, because we heard that a-a confused that russia is not going to send troops to ukraine, so please, just in case, convincingly. what can i say, but tell me, please,

when the special russian military operation began, i said not in the twenty-second year, but in the twenty-second, but when nato began, so to speak, to expand. to the east, we talked about it 100 times just out of respect. well, please. so , because of this country especially, the closer to russia the more terrible for them. they knew perfectly well that russia is capable not of what they are clear. maybe i i say this, you said yesterday, that's enough. you also said they'll get rid of you. enough. the glory of fornication is always called by its right name alexander nikolaevich said everything you need for you. why don't you expand them? they have their own strategic interests. yes, no one is what the russians and destroy. yes, i'm talking about vasyutiruyu, you know, why wag mike wag. why far agreed? i 'll tell you everything. and yes, come on, not like portia and

the country's strange baltic liturgy. they see clearly, they just know who they're dealing with. they then they thought, what if russia wants to return to itself, crimea what if someone does not understand, they knew it now, of course, they wrote us conversations. either they are now saying, thank god that we are in nato, they are for what is happening now, this is confirmation. why did they come in on what is confirmation? you are a victim of western propaganda. you don't even try. they know who they are dealing with, because russia at one time, when, according to this logic, well, just here are the stamps, therefore, in poland, suddenly, this is the hyena of europe, we know who we are dealing with according to this logic, the states. this is an international terrorist. we know who we are dealing with and so on, so russia is free to think widely. well, it's made for this . even our studio is well lit. well, please, i will give it to god. you know, i recently watched a film called wings of the empire

, a russian film i simply recommend everyone to watch, because in this film it is shown with strokes how the russian empire developed, how they worked against it and how it was destroyed, and the worst thing is that when we speak, being people and well educated, studying history the position of the anglo-saxons did not change. they have no interest in the people living on the territory of the russian federation, they have an interest only in our resources and there is an interest in our territory. and they will never change these interests, they will not exclude them, if during the soviet period. uh, here's the soviet period. yes, i remember how cautiously we

picked up ideological stamps from one side and the other in order to show tell each other to blame today no one picks up anything russia has become the object of a serious attack 1991, when the soviet union collapsed a. they just collapsed their special operations, thanks to ours. eh, here. uh, inside, uh, the traitor was the period when in the ninety-fourth year they wanted to destroy russia as well, but then half-steps were worried about us, let's say, because the minister of defense, by and large, sent all the money that remained in the ministry of defense to spas strategic missile troops and made it possible to have. at least with something to defend ourselves, well, we are in that

during the period, the officers simply did not receive a salary, we worked part-time, where it was, perhaps, with colonel and lieutenant colonel ranks, we went to settings and worked as security guards, and what was there to be embarrassed about and then our great country was put in this position. uh, they divorced, and when there was a change of power in russia, uh, they remember at 90 in 2000 on the first of january. uh, then world magazines who is putin hu from the month of putin who is putin on it so, that's more accurate, yes, i didn’t absolutely sincerely think that the whole situation would be the same, well, controlled in personal and so on, but in 2007 i admit the munich speech was delivered, putin and putin then in a serious way. within the limits of the gentlemen, what have you been doing for 15 years, mind you guys. well, why? what for? why are you doing this, after

that there were a dozen munich speeches of the president of russia let's go. thank you so much for this uh short and very important. i hope helpful michael is such a digression into historical truth. and now look, now we look at the current situation on the current map in general, the world of a changing, changed world, and we look, well, put the rhetoric on the rise, more and more formidable, the nato foreign ministry themselves recognize us as who there are monstrous threats or hellish threats and sanctions are given to us, remember how the americans call it and in general a circular word. hell, another very bad word is constantly heard in the context of escalation in the context of raising rates. here, look at the typical headline. and that's all, i'll tell you. uh, just goosebumps, well, give us that headline, please. here he is in nato called nuclear weapons the highest guarantee. this quote is a quote from the official statements

of the leaders of the members. nato once again, let's get nuclear weapons - this is the highest guarantee of the alliance's security well, strictly speaking, if you don't want to see, so to speak, subtext, you can say, well , more, well, yes, well, they said, if thank god well, yes, that 's right, but yes, at this same time, in this context, what is happening, of course, this is a hint, of course, this is a hint that all sorts of agreements and in general, so to speak, the general humanitarian representation. the principle of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons goes far back in history. i take it that way. and i would like to support your idea and tell you that over time the situation is changing and the approaches and strategies that are presented to us are also changing. it is very important that the statement of the general secretary became tamberg, who said about the fourteenth year, because it is big. something made an involuntary big confession. we know, but

we did not have any proof and official confirmation that they prepared. they prepared the people, they prepared the situation for 8 years. here are the conversations that we have about weapons, they have already been everything has been delivered, and today the weapons that have been delivered to ukraine and which work today, they are only paid for in conversation, they talk about the numbers that are supposedly allocated there, formalized in relation to ukraine and will then somehow be withdrawn , as it turns out, moreover, zelensky is not shy about talking about those stolen russian money, that we will count on this money, but i want to give you an example you know one very important conversation, the commanders of the reconnaissance company of the tula airborne division, who was sent in a telegram told about that. well , what kind of ukrainians could they resist the current conditions, listen, all this is sane for

people. all clear. you understand, we have specialists everywhere and their foreign weapons, which today, using a space constellation of 265 satellites using avaxes that fly along the border, when control is being adjusted , the fourth one is hidden. well, yes, everything right, everything is right, they don’t even hide it even today. today we are openly waging war with nato, only the other way around. nato is with us. nato is with us. you are resisting and they have put us in such conditions when we are forced to defend ourselves, and we defend ourselves sergey lavrov said that the decision of the north atlantic alliance itself in madrid seriously violates russia's founding act of nato and moscow will analyze them. well, wait, but the application was given. nikolaevich well, look really. this rate increase seems to me, it's understandable, it seems to me,

here you are completely thank you for this you are not shy. uh, so to speak, do not lay out clearly and thank you for this again, which means, well, the stakes are rising, each side, so to speak, inflicts. eh, this one makes certain moves, and then this one, this one, this statement comes from the bowels of nato and is a little uncomfortable or normal about nuclear weapons. well, with or without a statement, but nuclear weapons objectively exist on both sides. and russia has repeatedly stated that nuclear weapons is a guarantee of its safety fact. as a matter of fact, why doesn't nato say that uh the main topic of expansion is uh, it means to say that you know nuclear weapons, by the way, great stuff. well, why do you pretend that you do not understand from them, uh, observing certain and diplomatic politeness, i, in my place, can allow not to comply with it. because of this,

respectively, it turns out that i make weapons and today the only thing that balances the forces of russia in relation to nato and nato in relation to russia are some kind of guarantee not, so to speak, not an attack from each other direct and immediate, whether this is a guarantee, not an attack. is a limited application possible? i think it's impossible, but, or it will all develop into a nuclear apocalypse well, this is not the answer now. i am no one, all the more so, because the decision is made by completely different people at a completely different level, but obviously, for me, i’ll step back a little. i think i really didn't like society. uh, hmm source lady here, and now i i constantly refer to this, because i see how the informational and ideological preparation for the direct is now going on. novinho with nato countries i mean indirect clash in russia. well

, probably not, because russia is not, and even at war officially, ukraine is here with ukraine and ukraine is not friends, if you read ukraine yes, they don’t hunt at the level of public figures there, the rhetoric of power. yes, but now, but wars are wars - you understand this is legal, so to speak, strict state, it means that there is a war in russia in ukraine - it's not just here that we are here, so to speak, in the heat of the moment, let's say on camera. no, this is not a war. it's also rhetoric. well, here's the war. so, this means that this is not a war, or ukrainians at least in ukraine do not declare anything similar to russia. strangely enough, but thousands are fighting in ukraine, this is not a reservation of thousands of western instructors, but, staff, officers and so on. well i don't know what. okay, but because of western weapons, western support so, in the donbass, in

transnistria, in abkhazia, all these are in addition to yarosla. i am i do not want to measure instructors. i want to understand if this is not uh. the very war that we need is already being waged by the second, all this intelligence, satellite constellations, weapons instructors mercenaries for which it had nothing against it in this wording, but not only in this wording. i said a long time ago that i believe this clash is inevitable anyway. well, yes, you can actually discuss it, right? uh, encouraging initiative there, when and under what circumstances it will begin, it is inevitable, it inevitably, i understood everything nuclear or non-nuclear can be discussed, just come on, i really want to discuss it and i really want to give it to him, which i want to return. yes, it started because the head wants to leave the head, right? as for the naked body , well, and i am shifting the wording for

female ears to the maximum for the air, but on this i don’t want to say one thing, a true gentleman does not have photographs in his album where he is depicted naked. and for some reason johnson has photos in the case of toothless then thank you i will contact you ilya vladimirovich well, look, what a mess, and i repeat, the stakes are rising. and it ’s impossible not to respond to some attacks, look, in fact. we're discussing legal grounds here. there is a vision of hostilities today, but in fact ukraine continues to protect economic trade relations with the russian federation in spite of everything despite everything, with all the aggressive territory. here you are. excuse me, but this is a fact, uh, which has a justification ukraine earns billions today dollars on the transit of russian gas fact oligarchs earn. well, look, let's be

like this in this case. we are talking now about the budget of ukraine of ukraine, which is the only volume income of the ukrainian state today. this is the transit of russian gas, and no one and no one and no one is actually going to stop anything. we must clearly understand for ourselves that today's all these meetings that we have been observing lately j7, then nato. this is all a consequence of those events that are taking place in my country in my homeland because ukraine today is chosen by the west as a testing ground, as a training ground, then the aggression that they implement through ukrainian life against russians. yes, it was such a terrible plan that they managed to implement, and this is

not the first. battle in this endless battle for 41 years, then we endured something changed. no, we are talking about the concept of containment. nato is just we, uh, understand, will justify a military bloc that has been going on for decades. looking for a convenient model for the destruction of our slavic world and these models were used around the world provoked us repeatedly, syria georgia yugoslavia, i will now give you examples of collapse. nato's positions in the confrontation with russia and here is the new history of ukraine, the history of our brotherly people, which was conveniently chosen, pumped up with weapons and provoked by war. i have already said that in

reality the first mistake or perhaps a provocation was made when the representatives of the american embassy forced the ukrainian parliament or the ukrainian authorities to change the constitution and yet it is a mistake. this is not a mistake for the ukrainian people and the provocations that ate it up. see in this case. yes, i finish then in reality, because the american ambassador was present in the parliament and actually conducted the parliament and the constitution was changed. and we remember that it was the change outside the bloc in status that became the confrontation between our strange americans attorney general today, and today the americans and the british. they say it's us it turns out that ukraine was never going to accept nato guys. look guys, he who

is used for the attack has been going on for a long time for ukrainians . sorry for this vernacular term divorced divorced for cheap. yes, all of us actually faced canoes at summits said that the united states intends to announce additional assistance to ukraine in the field of armaments for 800 million ybn and another biden said that the united states is uniting the world to support whom you thought ukraine so vladimir putin today addressed the participants 10 petersburg international legal forum. and listen to what he said. some states are not ready to accept the loss of dominance in the world rome, they seek to maintain an unjust unipolar model under the guise of the so-called rule-based order and other dubious concepts, they try to control and

direct global processes at their own discretion. lead a course towards the creation of closed blocs and coalitions that make decisions that are beneficial to only one side of the united states of america natural the rights of other participants in international relations are ignored selectively, the fundamental principle of the indivisibility of security is interpreted on an unprecedented scale, imposed by the west, unilateral illegitimate sanctions against sovereign states. i will add that those countries that preach their exclusivity and in their domestic policy step over the right cross out such concepts as the inviolability of property. freedom of speech. in a word, the dominance of one country or group of countries on the world stage, not only unproductive, but also dangerously and inevitably generates large-scale systemic

risks. well, it seems to me that it is quite difficult to argue with this. on another matter, that it is difficult to realize here as a hegem, so to speak, er, lovers of hegemons, i mean, just looked. sincerely, here it is difficult to realize this, but it is necessary georg is necessary. sometimes it is even necessary that they be helped to realize. i think that's what we're doing now . vladimir vladimirovich is a little tired, because he has been repeating the same thing over and over since the munich speech, about which you speak, but vladimir putin he is a specialist in law, and as a specialist he perfectly understands one thing, that the law is nothing without the power that supports this right, and again with all due respect, the munich speech. putin would not have had such an effect if the next year, after moscow, they would not have confirmed the theses voiced in this speech. i mean, of course, our reaction based on the august 2008 conflict. we clearly showed that we are serious, we are serious. so

there was, then i remember. wrote a lot we followed behind everything in the eighth year, there was a feeling that we were understood, that putin's munich speech was assimilated, at least for a while, for 6 years. this assimilation remained in force in the fourteenth year. the west has the feeling that munich i forgot in the eighth year staged a coup in ukraine but. well, i didn’t forget, we understand, but it’s interesting. ah. and what happened, what is the human factor? i think that yes, the human factor, that is, they relaxed somewhat. they saw they thought that the eighth year was an excess, that the eighth year was some kind of accident, but what is globally , that is, it is an investment in ukraine that is much more important than georgia moscow passes, especially there after the sochi olympics, especially on all these factors. they think that moscow is nothing. moscow made two second year was the next lesson won on the other side. this lesson. wait wait, but on the other hand. actually, the

hegemonies refuse to say so. i don't even know the complexity, in my opinion, it's generally simple. perhaps alexander nikolaevich well, how to give back, so to speak, everything, like here you are, if you come with a revolver, share so nikolaevich lie down very many. uh, like bulgakov's yes, you have to, so you will be compacted. uh, so if there are seals in a revolver and who carries any power anyway? yes okay and if not, well, that is, of your own free will, no one will condense alexander nikolaevich no of course, i see no reason for anyone to condense here, well , yes, the means of solving this issue. she has a device of the world, but including rising nahimony is, encroaching on hegemony. here is, so to speak, the position that has just been voiced. but there is a position, the next opposite position, that western civilization is based on three things in order of law and hierarchy, the last

word is almost never used, they are afraid of it. here. but in fact, it is precisely about the fact that there is no hierarchy that official russia is talking about today, and in the person of the laurel in the person of the president. we told him that a collision is inevitable in such positions, which means we heard the munich speech and whether this was the reason that the west did nothing in the eighth year, and in all likelihood they were not ready to want that weak reaction that followed on the georgian events still remains a mystery to me. but we are faced with something else. eh, from the fourteenth year there was preparation, and then a happened. uh, the break also repeatedly spoke about this for four years of trump in practice, but this preparation was stopped and only with his re-election a new stage began and the implementation of those decisions that were

taken at the end of 14-15 words. suddenly, someone still programs. what kind of implementation decisions the administration continued is strange. in autumn, at the riga sammet, i attended the expert community. including the military, represented by nato experts, declared that russia is an aggressor, that it poses a danger, exactly what was now voiced later. how many turned out 7 years 7 years, of course. all 7 years. they matured from them 4 years. they were preparing, they were preparing. they somehow poorly prepared to say, because they forced him to ukrainian something supplied somewhere prepared, what is there no, well, disaster, they were preparing. here we are ready, because it was easy to declare that they would close the sky to ukraine, but it turned out to be

scary to actually close the sky, but and so on. i understand. let's out of respect for uncle michael's blog please. yes , president putin loves to speak in american hegemony, he and he spoke about it very often, you don’t like it. ah, well, i think it's hegemo. there are no more years of demons talking about it, well done, you cling to her, but she is gone. why are you clinging? this is precisely because of or thanks to uh, the growth of china rising china so here, uh, talking about the american hegemon, it doesn’t have to, and further and more i am 10 years later, the american calls that hegemony has become even smaller, so here it should, it should expose you . what about american production? you can find us, we're just helping this process. how can we, yes, please, say, like the word is one, and so to speak, the content of american arbitrariness,

which president putin spoke. well, what is he let's say self-criticism concerns americans. so. i mean in terms of sanctions. it's really. i can agree with president putin because indeed. when the united states freezes russian assets, this is a comment, as it means to the point called the right of the central bank of the russian federation when there are serious proposals that are being considered not only to freeze, but to liquidate these reserves and requisition, yes, and to transfer this money to ukraine is called theft banal this is generally tin adversary legal. but what about right? why did you kill millions of children? here are the likes, how are half a million children like this now? can i say it? well, what have you already said? it seems to me that i

agree that it is then why else to talk with you, i agree, liz. this is how i consider you a teenager, if you look at it purely from the point of view of reality. let's try this right of the strong listening to do it, because they may like it or not, so it doesn't speak for health, absolutely we do, yes, and what about hegemony? what are you, yes. we are just here he is, says, three-point order of the right hierarchy. well, in general, to be honest, rightfully strong, what we want, then i do, but it's excuse me . how to change it change to become different strong. that's all about the options they apologized to their hands, only becoming as strong or strongest. it can't become the strength of the economy, the strength, it's not that, listen uh, then uh strength, it's not just vulgar quantities. there are no gold coins there,

it is both political will and determination to use their military force there and so on or resources, you understand, and not that, of course, about the son will not. i'll call. don't be dollars inedible, as you know, understand about the change. yes, some rhetoric has already started talking there, and it means that your colleagues from the united states of america , here is what the forentpora polis wrote . the more kiev strives for a military victory, the more likely it will be defeated . us policy should change to reflect this reality if the us changes its policy. this will help save the lives of ordinary ukrainians and prevent further territorial losses . administration. baida. at the very least, it should keep its goals of weakening russia down and instead rely on diplomacy to ensure that kiev and moscow agree on a peace, it is vital to avoid

the risk of a direct confrontation between the us and russia to cease fire in the interests of ukraine, europe, the us and the world. at this crossroads, it is imperative that the us and the west be seen as the real state of affairs on the battlefield. they recklessly strove for something unattainable glory without expense so unexpected to my taste. maybe say so. e authors i don't i see, but in my opinion, quite a common analyst approach. you could repeat that i am referring to this. and what is so something surprising that it is necessary to avoid a direct collision of the issue i will explain the issue. there are various concerts. so there are concepts of militant there, relatively speaking, boris johnson uh- huh, not an inch, which means even more weapons, even more corpses. so, do not give up, guys stand to the end. you see, it never occurs to anyone, so to speak, to interpret the words. to what end to what? and here it is clear that there is there is another approach from all sides who want to reach

some kind of end, and no one really knows any one. the end of them is not, completely unaware of any number. you don't know anything. you know, at least he said, yes, donate any amount. e people. eh, it's very and it's very