i’ll pay you didn’t hear about the draw, pay through rbp. and win the main prize, actually a million rubles. pay for purchases through the system of fast payments from partners of the promotion and participate in the drawing of cash prizes every day. choose your chicken box for 129 rubles. only at kfc only discounts of up to seventy percent go up on beds , sofas, mattresses, pillows and other products for a healthy sleep. ascona happens. when you are at the helm of your business you need the perfect tinkoff leverage for your business translation is 15 million rubles to the accounts of individuals without commission payments by the counterparty are also without commission. automatic overnight deposits open an account for business at tinkoff.ru and get individual conditions for your business tinkoff is one of a kind.

let's not mix personal and work stuck a little paperwork in the finance department. the bosses shrunk. why does your relationship hurt my business? she is a scorched apprentice. she's just an unhappy mother official. see, all series on the movie one tv movie 1tv presents hello paul

mikhailovich, born in 1907, head of intelligence. now you have nothing of your own no only someone else's alien life someone else's name. turn on your voice, press the red button on the remote control and start the game , guess the fate of the participants. get instant prizes promo codes. play where it is convenient for you the legendary capital show becomes interactive now you can take part in the field of miracles without leaving the screen, spin the drum using the red button on your remote control. answer questions and earn points. if you fall a prize, you are the lucky owner of a gift, and we will invite the most active to play on tvs with the hdbtv function in an interactive

player on the first channel website and in the first mobile application. and i will make up my lips and let the foresters down. and love to sing sincerely at moments of warm friendly meetings and home holidays. channel one continues to accept applications for participation in the all-russian drinking songs competition. go to the site, fill out an application and get a chance to win 3 million rubles. this he confirms attention to everyone, he is in the area

i remind you to take the fifth floor alive. thank you very much. we are fourth from the right. is there any of ours on the third?

went to you. i remind you to take alive. block the exit on the second floor. drive him through the gallery. to the next wing. there is a dead end, we leave the second floor .

alive remove hear.

so this is a terrorist. they rarely give up, sorry. how long does a dna test take from 12 hours to a day usually? where can you go i'll go now i have them too , i don't argue.

we are on the spot. yes, we have received the complete set . emergency call, uh everything started. no , what about him? gone. if it's not you, it means i'm going to evacuate you, i announce code 14. i'll be there in 10 minutes. wait, not like that, quickly. i arthur must pick up well.

dad drove fast no questions. you have 5 minutes to pack your bag because mom is gone, everything is there. thank god we are all right. he said

you are gone. who said. just pick up my son and the transmitter and the rest later. son verni at any cost

good evening on air big game today head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs lavrov is in vietnam where he held very productive talks with his vietnamese counterpart. and i must say that vietnam is russia's key partner in southeast asia and very intensive military-technical cooperation is developing with it. vietnam is also the first osian country. the association of southeast asian nations, which has concluded a free trade agreement with the eurasian economic union, and tomorrow. uh, sergey lavrov will fly to another equally important country in southeast asia in indonesia which is currently chairing the g20. there, er, namely in bali tomorrow

and the day after tomorrow, the g20 meeting at the level of foreign ministers will be held, and the united states secretary of state, antonin, will also be there. and this is very bright. in my opinion. the path of the failure of american attempts to isolate russia and, in particular, to exclude it from the g20 , the attempts of the united states to bring down the russian economy with the help of sanctions have also failed. today, sanctions are causing more and more damage to themselves western countries. well, finally, the attempt to turn the tide on the uh, the front of the special operation in favor of ukraine, with the help of stands , uh, is failing. more weapons, but nevertheless, while washington stubbornly continues to substitute weapons for the kiev regime and refuse the possibility of peace negotiations, and yesterday karen jean-pierre, the official representative of the den house, said this again, here are the reasons and consequences of this, and policy

of the united states, we will speak today with the president of the center for the national interest in dmitry simes and first deputy chairman of the russian state duma committee on the commonwealth of independent affairs hello eurasian integration and relations with fellow countrymen konstantin zatulin dmitry konstantin fedorovich good evening dmitry well, the first question for you, well, in moscow they really proceed from the fact that the current american policy does not work or somehow does not work as planned. i gave arguments. e in favor of this. do you think the time has come for the united states show leadership, as washington likes to say, and change this policy to abandon the policy that does not work and move on to some other one that has a better chance of success or is appreciated in washington. uh, the effectiveness of the current policy is somehow different. uh, dmitry washington believes that they are pursuing a rather flexible policy, which is evolving and taking

new steps. e. well, for example, the latest idea is to set a ceiling on the price of oil. and not just, as it were, to adopt within the framework of the collective west, but also actively persuade and put pressure on other countries. well , as for ukraine, more and more weapons are being given to ukraine, and weapons are being given that, relatively recently, we heard was considered unacceptable for the ukrainian situation. e, and. if you just think about the scale of this e -assistance that is being provided to ukraine, i will tell you. well, it’s really comparable to slanglease, only a linguist was provided to great britain and the soviet union and which were american allies against hitler and now it is provided to ukraine, which, in general, is still no one said that it is part of the fundamental

american national interests, and ukraine, of course, is not a member of nato, and now there is not even a question of what you will do, what we need. well, probably a calculation. the fact that quantity will turn into quality, which, as ukraine receives these weapons. she already receives some of them in uh number of several copies. and some, as you know, in thousands and thousands, it comes from the fact that, as kra-ukraine receives it, as it turns out, the corresponding preparation. as she does. uh is learning to use this very complex weapon in uh. in america , there is an understanding that, in general, and the most modern systems require more preparation so that they can be effectively managed, in short, washington proceeds that, indeed,

probably in august. e parts of zelensky will be able to come to some kind of counteroffensive. i think there is an understanding that this counteroffensive will not lead to a russian defeat. there is an understanding that it is fast, but to achieve some noticeable results on the field fight, it will not work about it. american military experts are now talking more and more. and if you like, the mood is a hatred of captivity, which was most recently in the american press. these sentiments are a thing of the past, but nevertheless suggest that zelensky knows what he is doing, that he should be given a chance to use these weapons to try to go on the counteroffensive, and given that on the battlefield from the american point of view, according to american calculations, and there is less about ukraine

artillery for much more manpower, and there there is one mobilization after another in ukraine, then there is in washington. what is this offensive? in general, it will somehow change e dynamics on the battlefield. and that uh, the sanctions uh will hit russia more and more painfully, and then, maybe, uh, russia, putin will have to develop some new , more flexible approach. this is what washington hopes for. although i repeat. this is hope, no one talks about it with sovereignty dmitry it seems to me that the united states makes the same mistake over and over again. they are very trusting numbers to the scale of numbers. and the same thing happened in afghanistan, remember, when the united states provided a large number of weapons, and drive the regimes. and, in principle, the former afghan government was told that in terms of

technical equipment, in terms of the number of weapons, in terms of the number of manpower, even the official afghan armed forces are an order of magnitude. kalibs go, so they can't lose. and we remember what happened as a result. and now, uh, now yes, you absolutely correctly said about all these numbers and these figures are impressive, but on the other hand there are results. yes. and as for the results, but now, uh, i'm not sure yet, at least, the scale of these weapons, which, uh, are being provided to the united states. in ukraine, they really change qualitatively, the results qualitatively change the dynamics of what is not there yet. so i'll tell you and they don't talk much about it, uh in moscow uh, of course, ukrainian troops, and not only neo-nazis, but also separate parts of the regular army.

in general, they performed well. and they have motivation. i had a very interesting conversation with a leading ukrainian military expert speaking in washington. and that's what he said, he says at the beginning in the west, they underestimated, and the capabilities and readiness of the ukrainian army. he even tells us that he advised us to urgently flee, they are called surrendered. well, this is now another mistake underestimating the capabilities and morale of the russian army and underestimating that the russian army in the donbass has learned a lot, that it is more difficult to deal with it, and that it gets not just the best. well, she is learning to use it in such a way as to coordinate the actions of various branches of the military, so that everything is

, if you want, more subordinated, e to a single strategy, and this, of course, e suggests that the military dynamics of the ukrainian situation, it is not easy, it's not that this is a one-sided game, the collective west is stealing ukraine and russia is waiting. where will it end? russia is also doing a lot, and frankly speaking, the last result and they say that this is far from being successfully stated. are you one of the best specialists in ukraine can be the best in russia how do you a and you certainly know russia how do you assess what dmitry simes is talking about and how seriously in moscow they take a in russian in the state duma in particular, but take e. here. uh, really declared ukraine to go into some kind of counteroffensive. and indeed, here i completely agree with dmitry simons. washington

places certain hopes on this, but the state duma is not an analogue of the general staff. therefore, the points of view of deputies it doesn't have to be exactly the same, and it's not authorized. in fact, as we ourselves are well aware of conducting hostilities. the state duma is preoccupied with other issues, but if you are interested in my personal opinion in this case, i believe that, of course, the united states and we started with them. fell into a certain temptation you know, there is such an orthodox concept to fall into the temptation, so the united states fell into the temptation with the beginning of the events in ukraine in february. they considered that this is the chance that will allow very inflict serious damage on russia. perhaps, in the event

of a successful development of events, to shake its internal stability and stability, that is, to provoke a speech against the current government against the backdrop of what will happen on the battlefield. we are not seeing this now. i hope we don't watch. but as far as the calculations of the united states are concerned, militarily, if i understand correctly, they suffer from many shortcomings, well, for example. given that there are indeed several waves of mobilization in ukraine, mobilization the prohibition there not only for men to leave the territory of ukraine, and now a conflict broke out, as you know, between zelensky and his military, who now prohibit moving from one place to another without permission inside ukraine inside ukraine itself, the

territory they control, because they are completely unsure that this movement is not in fact a desertion, a desire to evade military duties, a degree in this regard of motivation and a desire to protect. doubtful since such decisions are made, because that they indicate that not everything is fine, in the danish kingdom, dmitry spoke of motivation with this motivation, but now let's figure it out. this means that even the supply of american weapons, which, as a rule, is artillery, as a rule, anti-aircraft, and anything else does not really lead, for example, to the restoration of capabilities in the air, because ukraine today is actually deprived of any combat aviation, with the exception of certain episodes with repaired or uh, located somewhere in stock. uh, combat aircraft, in fact

, dominates the air of russia, ukraine is decided by the naval forces, that is, they were not representative today. they don't exist at all. in this situation, everything is what supplies what. america and the countries of the west of ukraine are usually artillery weapons. as a rule, these are the missiles of different calibers and different ranges. this, of course, is significant, but imagine that sometime in the forty- fourth year, making your decision to land on the atlantic wall and begin to open second front. so at this point, let's say strategies. uh, the allied americans and he and the british. eh, they would agree that they would not have any advantage in the air. in general, they give way to the air of the germans, so to speak, but at the expense. the number of troops they are going

to achieve victory at all, they would never actually do this in their lives, moreover, during the military operations of the second world war after 44 we later they mainly focused on the capabilities of their combat aviation with naval artillery, and so on and so forth, especially during the period when they were trampling around on the peninsula of normandy, that is, in fact, from the point of view of military planning and expectations, the situation is completely not so successful. er, actually. the rosy question lies in the other, that, uh, doing their actions is not very rosy for anyone not very rosy for the prospects of alienating the russian troops, albeit the collective west, yes in this case, for ukraine in the first place. and, of course, for her allies. secondly, the dispute goes to togo,

how fast, how effectively russia is developing its offensive, but still it is developing it, and uh, the situation here about ten zelensky strikes there, as you know, in stalin's time there were 10 stalinist strikes or something like that, it is a very doubtful question lies, in fact, in the fact that the current administration of the united states has become a hostage to these decisions. she considers her main achievement to be not so much the fact that she supplies weapons to ukraine, but the fact that she built the entire western camp. and it has reached, as it were, such a degree of controllability, in which the countries of the west, not the united states, let's say in germany or france, or other old countries of europe, are forced in spite of their obvious economic interests. first of all, to impose chains on oneself in order to e

participate in the common front of the struggle against russia and, e, the outcome of this struggle. actually. it's not at all obvious in my opinion. although i do not rule out that both we and the countries of the west. getting ready for something. the prospect of an option under which we will announce to their victory they will announce that this is their victory , that's what victory for the west really is to me . uh, i would like to find out, because if the victory of the west is that a sanctions regime has been created that will exist forever, then i would like to know what will happen to us as a result of this eternal sanctions regime. we will sort it out somehow, but with them, that is, the state or they will withstand this eternal sanctions regime, which they themselves will establish. as for the prospects for ukraine, i must

to say that ukraine's prospects it is clear to me that ukraine is falling apart. and these parts will be at least two. maybe more because the part that is already occupied by russian troops. i do not suppose that it is possible, an operation of unprecedented scale, which will lead to the loss of this territory already. controlled by russia , the tightening of the aggravation it occurs is more likely to happen and the systems that are supplied are much more lethal. this is evidence of this tightening, which goes along all lines and in in relation to the west and in relation to russia and in relation to ukraine now. let's compare, if we talk about the direct confrontation between the possibility of russia's mobilization and the possibility of ukraine's mobilization, they are simply not comparable, and , by the way, american experts honestly warned about this before the events began, but then they got lost and got lost under the impression that they are

now starting again acknowledge it. yes, yes, they got lost under the impression that not everything happens so quickly. uh, ukraine still resists. and when she resists. means, this is a chance. let's saturate and saturate its weapons, but all these weapons are not complete in terms of complexity. this does not give, in general, any guarantee of the absence of air supremacy. the sea and at the same time, uh, a significant superiority to date, the capabilities of artillery systems and all the others that we use. uh, not to mention high-precision weapons, which not only ukraine does not have in the west, in fact, i wanted to ask you a question. uh. so i agree, with almost everything that konstantin said, with what they agree. i agree i don’t know either, probably, if they think, so that they find out yes, so that, so that in me, it turns out to be too much compromising you under washington, so, dmitry, that’s what interests me about what you said at the beginning konstantin so he

said, here you are look. what efforts is the west making? what is the risk for the west, uh, the military and konstantin just spoke about the economic. why do you think this is being done? what is the motive? now, uh, i'll tell you that in america this question is being asked more and more often. i was recently at a republican event, where there were non-specialists political activists and several people asked me a question after my speech. and here is what is actually happening in ukraine around ukraine, which is so important for the united states, what are the stakes there, and here is one uh version that was expressed by people, it was very, let's say from my point of view reasonable they say, well, after uh failure in afghanistan, of course, they wanted to demonstrate. and who is the united states that can do something, uh,

can do something, that they, if you like, are not fading great kept, but then one person said, who, as he explained to me, was a colonel in iraq, he says, you see, here we are interfering in some kind of situation. and when we intervene, as they say, it is easy and simple and no fundamental interests are required. it can be done, it can be conquered. this is necessary, as it were, to increase its credit capacity on a global scale. and then you find out that it's all difficult, that it's expensive before. it was a peripheral organization. and now you know, this american expression will be corrected by refiling. this war is starting belong to you. this is not their war anymore. this is your war. this is an american war. and perhaps this feeling has some meaning. let me here

i remember one of my favorite bond films. this is just a dissident film that didn’t bring one agent never say never, which sean connery shot in spite of broccoli, and the team that shoots continued to shoot their heirs shoot bond. there is an episode where the main villain lada plays an invincible bond in a computer game to control the world. here i have it seems that the special insanity that this story has acquired is connected with the fact that you never talk about the situation in afghanistan , you never planned an offensive and a war in iraq, conflicts in the middle east never periodically flared up and there is an ally of the united states to which it always went armament - this is israel, the impression has never arisen that there is a general struggle for peace in general for the dominion of the world. here i am, well, i have more and more.

it feels like i don't know if it was the original motive, but as it goes on, this motive seems to get stronger. yes, the first world war is a world order. this is a new world war, which is definitely of a hybrid nature, and at the epicenter of this struggle is the main question of american politics and world politics. it's a matter of power. and, of course, germany in the world, but it seems to me that the united states is the real issues of this struggle in the right face and, uh, because russia looks like a potential ally of china, china, that is, the one that abandons call. if china is deprived of this support, then it is possible, maybe possible to cope with it, but the united states has lost. uh, global positions over the past 15 or so years. and even now it seems to me that they really have already searched and

created in many ways. uh, an excuse to try to reverse historical trends. it seems to me that they share, as it were, a minimum program and a maximum program, a minimum program - this is what konstantin fedorovich quite rightly said about the consolidation of his closest allies and partners around him, the restoration of the bloc split of the world and bloc disciplines within the west, and this task has been achieved in how long. how much is stable, but so far it has been achieved, and the maximum task is, of course, to try to restore american global hegemony. and here, of course, the united states is trying to take russia out of the game, because in this case, china will actually be left face to face in a strategically very unfavorable situation for itself, and the environment in an unfavorable situation. because the it is the russian-chinese tandem that creates that pole of power, which surpasses the united states separately and is comparable to the combined

resources of the collective west and even in many ways outstrips them. but here, what i would like to emphasize here again, agreeing with what konstantin fedorovich spoke about. this is a hybrid war - this is a struggle for world order. it will go much longer and much wider than the conflict in ukraine, the conflict in ukraine is one of the manifestations. today is the central manifestation, but even after the conflict is ended one way or another and ended, of course, with the success of russia, the common struggle of the united states and its allies for the restoration of their e, global dominance will continue, but now, if we return to the e ukrainian conflict, here, it seems to me, the united states is doing a very dangerous thing. uh, i would say even an adventurous bet, because very much. now washington is really posing the prospect of this semi-mythical counter-offensive of ukraine, and if this

counter-offensive fails, and we proceed from the fact that that it is highly likely to fail, then the reputational political defeat of the united states and the collective west will be very far away, and it turns out that the united states is now standing. before three elections. you know, like a rider. uh, from russian epics in front of a stone. yes, and on this stone it is written, so you will go in one direction, huh? that is, if you allow e ukraine, e, to try to carry out this counteroffensive, you will lose in full , and if you do not allow e ukraine, e, to carry out this offensive and force it to start negotiations with russia is peaceful and if you end this conflict with politics through diplomacy right now, you will lose like. but still, it’s not like you will lose if this counteroffensive fails, but the third option. this is world war iii. this is after the loss

of ukraine in order not to accept, and the reality of a fundamental big defeat is to escalate, but the biden administration, as it were, is saying that this third option is categorically unacceptable and thank god that she says so, it turns out to be a choice. it's better than if you spoke differently. well, that's what i wanted to ask, konstantin yes. yes, uh there was such a person , of course you know, well who he pushed off the civilization that spoke. ah, the conflict of civilization. he, of course, described civilizations a little differently, basically, there is religion and history, ethnic principles. well, it seems to me that, in general, hankington, who was not taken very seriously at that time. basically, he predicted that a very important book, the clash of civilization, would be published in 1993 . i'm just explaining why not very serious because then francis fukuyama's narrative about the end of history prevailed. well, i don’t know, it

seems to you, uh-huh what could it be, we really entered the stage of conflicts of civilizations, when this is not only about politics, but if you want about fundamental values, but the prototype of life, what kind of democracy for one side is democracy - it’s only they will organize elections in the united states where all minorities will be launched, and, let's say for many others in the world , democracy is when they can, when their countries can choose their own path of development. here notice that the united states is in my opinion. here , each of our parties believes that the other has opened the box. pandora americans believe that our decision to launch a special military operation has opened the box. pandora. we believe that on a much larger scale, the box of pandura will be opened by the united states themselves and the west, which they have acquired. well, they gave it the character of a clash between west and

east between russia and the united states. nata and so on and so forth, and in this case a few years ago. uh, there was every reason to say that, well yes, we have differences. between the orders that we have in the west, these orders that we have, but this is not a conflict of civilization, generally speaking, at the heart of our civilization, after all, the european matrix, although we are more and more fond of eurasianism, but still european we are europeans who have reached the pacific ocean. uh, going to the east, americans are europeans who reached the pacific ocean, going to the west, well, then the ocean divided the poems, but from a certain moment. it's really began to take on such a character, especially in connection with the changes that began to take place before our eyes in the domestic politics of the united states and europe, too, gender issues, the rejection of christian roots, and this whole story with e

black life has a meaning, which meant not just, that they matter, that whites don't matter, and so on and so forth. it all got bigger. breed already on ideological grounds and from this point of view, but listen to the united states and many others. i think you are fine and earlier it was clear that such a denial of russia is really just contrary to our desire, maybe they are simply pushing the union of china, they are simply pushing it simply with their attitude towards russia, and especially with what is happening now, when in the west, you know, it’s not just the supply of weapons about that it is necessary to exclude e from the life of today's generations of russian politicians, public figures, impose sanctions on them, but sanctions must be imposed on dostoevsky, on tchaikovsky, on pushkin, on those who

sings on stage for those who perform. uh, movies and so on and so forth. that is from now on. indeed, this acquires for us here the character of a patriotic war for survival. and i would like to pay attention. in general , russia has never lost a single patriotic war. she lost wars. we have people who are fond of history, who do not know it well and speak it, russia in general lost wars in wars, the russian-japanese war lost the crimean war, lost in this crimean war. although it could actually continue it, but at that moment the elite was not ready for this. but the patriotic war. what was the time of troubles, which was the e war against napoleon e, the fight against the swedes acquired the character of the patriotic war, especially from the moment that began to happen in ukraine well, of course, the patriotic war of 41-45 is domestic wars, which we despite we are not ready for any sacrifices and we will not lose. and in

this regard, awakened. here in russia, such tendencies of strength, such an attitude towards oneself, which will for a long time, regardless of any outcome of this operation , determine the internal climate here in russia in relation to. it is very important that the united states also understand this. but what if in russia they begin to perceive the current current conflict precisely as the patriotic war, and the hybrid war against russia is a form of the patriotic war, then russia cannot be, you know, i would even said that people in russia do not understand many words, hybrid proxies and so on. this is understood by a specialist, but the word patriotic war is understood. that's when i get back to washington next week, if anyone is interested in my opinion i hope someone will have the most important thing that i want to say is that you just said that if you have this conflict in ukraine and the escalation that we are now seeing the last thing the united states and the entire west should want

is to encourage russia to push russia to the point where the war around ukraine would become, as konstantin would say for the russians, the patriotic war this is the last what would be in the interests west from my point of view, i completely agree with this. this does not cancel the struggle for world order that will continue, but the transformation of the conflict into the patriotic war against russia is extremely dangerous dmitry konstantin fedorovich thank you so much for a very interesting conversation. we will continue in a few moments. this is a television program that is true and capable of destroying the enemy, and here we discuss all the key events on all fronts from the front of the vaults of the front, ideological and cultural. radio-electronic premiere

the fight on saturday at the first dim i'm here at mts bank there, so as not to wait. i refueled such a cashback. sasha is enough. he loves good deeds, but again the cashback at first thought that you didn’t like me very much. no, sasha, at first i didn't like you less. thanks not at all. thank you for everything you have done for me. eh, didn't

do it for you. this is mts bank mts premium, we get super cashback on the most popular categories of 5% at lukoil gas stations in supermarkets, cafes and grocery delivery. nothing is nothing when the pain is sharp makes you climb the wall staff in a big red package rushes to your aid charged against pain. incredible and reliability guaranteed bonus plus 5% to the first deposit in any bank online on financial services, a grand sale in sokolov has already begun discounts from 50% on all jewelry and watches of your favorite

brand right now you are traveling around russia on wells tinkoff investment launches gold into circulation. now buying gold is available in the tinkoff investments app, a great way protect money from inflation. it's simple and you don't have to be a professional. now gold, you can not only buy, but also win. install the tinkoff investment app, invest 1000 rubles in gold and win one of the thousands of tinkoff gold bars he is the only one wilson presents insomnia often wake up in the morning with these horrors, it's time to finish with welson. you can fall asleep after 20 minutes, sleep soundly through the night and wake up easily. bad in the morning, sleep no longer frightens. sugar tube from clean line and

close taste buds choose to benefit from hotels in cashback, return a large selection of hotels to ozone and cashback up to 10% watch right now only on kinopoisk and at an affordable price. now many are putting life on

pause due to rising prices with a loan from sovcombank , make important purchases at today's prices and turn all your plans back on. people are more important on the air the big game today is developing very rapidly in the uk where the government is fighting johnson and personally boris johnson appears to be leaving. and boris johnson , of course, is desperately fighting to retain the premiership, points to the military conflict in ukraine, which just proves that in many respects the tough position that the uk has recently taken, so the issue is connected precisely with domestic political factors in the

uk and johnson is trying to use military conflict to maintain power, but now this, apparently, does not help, but in connection with the last e conflict, but with the latest scandal. uh, more precisely, what happened to protégée, fight johnson who made a drunken brawl in one of the london clubs, and actually it became a trigger. uh, the unification of the british elite, uh, against the prime minister, something began that resembles just the exodus of such an exodus, but the exodus of the members of the government from the uk has already resigned 12 ministers, and as of uh, tonight, those ministers who remain intend to go to prime minister johnson and to talk about the fact that it is time for him to leave, including, and the need for jones's resignation for today was assured by senior e, member of the cabinet of ministers

, michael golf. well, in fact, the entire british press writes that and this is the end for the resignation of johnson is also supported by the vast majority, and british citizens and 69%, in principle, the respondents and 54% of conservatives. what is interesting to the conservative uh, the electorate is also for the resignation of boris but, well, it seems inevitable to me, but here the question arises. who will come to replace and, uh, johnson is fighting. in recent years, we have perceived it as the most striking symbol of the irresponsibility of the current political elites in the west. he is just such a concentrated expression of this irresponsibility, but one of johnson's most likely successors is the current british foreign secretary and

if she really becomes, but the new prime minister, then, probably, the degree of irresponsibility, british policy, will not go anywhere. do you think alekseevich is definitely not going anywhere, maybe even a list of tracks will be more consistent in its anti-russian course than e. boris johnson he he he his extravagances, sometimes forced him and, uh, flexibility to show. eh, listraz. apparently she wants to enter modern history, how such an inflexible lady may not be iron, but not bendable, and it seems to me that you are absolutely right. emphasize how modern the international agenda is related to domestic affairs. here is boris johnson who created, uh, tried to build this illusion of consolidation out of himself. uh,

the new church was not a step back. everything means this fight with russia for e. western hegeminists. order and so on and so forth, but it all falls apart pretty quickly, because the internal tension in all western countries is very large internal contradictions are huge within the ruling parties, not to mention between the ruling parties and the opposition parties, and even more tension between the parties, what the ruling, so that the opposition, but such parties by the traditional and wide sections of society that demand in general change of agendas, so e britain - this is a good example of how much this internal order really is, which they pass off as some wonderful monolithic and present to the

rest of the world. how fragile he is. unfortunately, britain is also not a very good example, namely, again, as he was rightly noted even if the destroyer is the prime minister, as well. he is likely to be replaced by a fundamental change. there will be no course, perhaps the style of politics will change, but there is every reason to believe that britain will continue to be the warmonger that it has been for the last months, especially the last, but the last weeks, so this is actually a pretty bad situation, because it shows that there is tension in the west, and the internal order is trumpet, but to they are not ready to change the policy and therefore the figures can change. oh, and the chaos grows. real change. in all likelihood, it will occur when and during electoral cycles during elections. in fact

, it is very remarkable that russophobia, which you mentioned it has become such an element, a and a constant not only in foreign but also in domestic policy of great britain yes, this is very important. changes that are unlikely to change after the resignation e fights johnson but e great britain in the far east e, many call japan da nu because of its status as the main ally and closest ally of the united states a in the far east and the lack of an independent policy, and especially under the current prime minister - minister of fumioxides, who has largely moved away from a more independent foreign policy pursued by his predecessor. uh, shinzu, aba, and japan has really gone completely into the united states and joined the anti-russian hybrid war in the last few days as well. tokyo even bet on even more for a greater escalation. e of this anti-russian

policy, firstly, japan has introduced new anti-russian sanctions, including a ban on the import of russian gold, and a ban on the provision of consulting. bow and more and expanded. uh, sanctions lists, secondly, exactly fumiokside recently announced the need to limit the price of russian oil. a and. e, and said that the price is an artificial price administratively appointed by the west. the price of russian oil should be half of the current e price of russian oil, but at the same time japan constantly emphasizes that it is still interested in importing both russian oil and especially russian liquefied natural gas. and which accounts for approximately 9% of japan's energy consumption, japanese companies are participating in the sakhalin 2 project. receive liquefied natural gas. and here

fumioksida in all seriousness and with such complete ease says that japan is counting on the continued supply of e, liquefied natural gas. because western sanctions do not limit the supply of lng yes, that's really impudence, i can't say another word. err lead, that is, and japan emphasizes that only those aspects of the relationship that they want to limit should suffer to be limited. and the fact that they do not want to limit. yes , here it is and uh, it must continue, as if in nothing never happened, but i don't think it will. and now, what about these and this strengthening of the anti-russian course. japan recently wrote e dmitry anatolyevich medvedev listen japanese premier kishida recently blurted out that the price ceiling for russian oil will be set at half of its current level in translation from japanese into

russian, which means there will be significantly less oil on the market. and its price will be much higher, and higher than the predicted astronomical price of $ 30,400. compare with the dynamics of gas prices. and here japan will not have a thread of gas from russia, as well as participation in the lng project sakhalin 2. and nikita andreevich how do you evaluate? japan's current approach and prospects in this case for russian- japanese relations? i think that japan really joined the anti-russian coalition? i would rather not focus on the personal factor here because mr. kida was the minister of foreign affairs in the abah government. and therefore, we are talking, rather, about the fact that the japanese elite has been historically dependent on the united states since the occupation of the country and in fact acts as one of the many american satellites of foreign policy issues. uh, in addition, now we must admit that we are talking about the fact

that the world is faced with a crisis of overproduction, its next wave somehow happened during the years of the great depression, as it was in the early forties, uh, and once again the western countries collectively the west is trying to solve these problems through conflict. now the collective west, first of all, europe faces a shortage of two key commodities - energy and food, and in many ways for in order to establish control over our resources, a proxy war was initiated in ukraine and there are attempts to destabilize central asia kazakhstan tajikistan uzbekistan cereals. it was one was one of the triggers, or rather grains and oil, just like in our times, and they went on the takeover, because, uh, internal contradictions

overproduction and the impossibility of further printing of the brand, where it made it possible to resolve the crisis internally. well, you can also give an example from japan, the actual oil embargo pushed japan, japan curl harbor. oh yes, it is precisely the entire crisis of the second world war that is associated with the same deficit. or rather, even an increase in prices for these goods. now russia has become the largest player in this market, including due to our strengthening in the middle east after the syrian war, and now it is for russian resources because of control. uh, over the energy resources of third countries there is a proxy war so far, but unfortunately there is a certain escalation of this conflict. there is a risk of nato countries being involved in it, for example, poland and against ukraine. but the most important thing is to understand that historically there are other parallels here. we're not fighting here for cheap oil or cheap

food. we are ukrainian patriots. russian army. those who are now trying to achieve the liberation of ukraine are fighting for their language, for their independence, for their identity, so we will win against those who just trying to make money to confirm what we were talking about before the break, that we're dealing with homeland. voinoy alexander vyacheslavovich how do you assess the prospects for japan's participation in sakhalin 2 in the context? well let's say japan now. it's just far eastern ukraine. even ukraine is not great britain, even ukraine. because the outskirts, and the outskirts, are controlled. uh, it’s not clear who the samurai ended up with from america, so i would say that the samurai has no goal, only putin, but no, there are more samurai there, as far as cool-2 is concerned. it was an absolutely colonial project, the agreement divided the products when the so-called foreign partners told the yeltsin government that you have no money, no opportunity to mine your own.