the burnt group of saboteurs and opened fire on them from a machine gun, the enemy was eliminated, on another day of melekhs. not far from the position of the russian military, the militants came into battle with the ongoing enemy forces and thwarted the provocation . from under the fire of a seriously wounded comrade and gave him first aid, and then evacuated two trucks to a safe place . although he also received a wound and concussion. and the exploits of the soviet soldiers-liberators of odessa during the great patriotic war tells a new multimedia section from the website of the ministry of defense to counteract the falsification of the history of the department publishes declassified documents of the central archive, separately submitted evidence of the crime of the nazi regime against civilians, open journals of the red army’s military operations and award materials describing the courage of the soviet soldier in the odessa offensive operation in march april 1944. today he accepts congratulations

master of national cinema and a well-known director who has been heading the country's main film studio mosfilm for a quarter of a century. karen shakhnazarv is 70 years old. he made almost two dozen films and many of them have become classics for us. jazz and i winter evening in gagra courier. all these films are loved by millions of viewers, and under his leadership mosfilm has become the most successful state film studio. once again turned into a real factory of dreams, shakhnazarov was able not only to preserve the great traditions, but to create a studio modern and in demand. today, russia for the first time at the official level celebrate one of the warmest and brightest holidays, the day of the family of love and fidelity, it is dedicated to the memory of the murom saints peter and fevronius, who are considered the patrons of marriage . strong and friendly families who have lived together for many years have been celebrating the holiday since 2008 last week. vladimir putin signed a decree

making july 8 the official date. i think that for any politician to appeal to someone from the great predecessors. this is just the norm of political life. and therefore, boris johnson, who always remembered churchill , wrote a book about him. by the way, this book, when he was still the mayor, of london was published in russian and quite interesting. yes, i read it , it deserves to expand the idea, and not only about churchill, but also about e-jones himself, not because, uh, his personality in the assessment was manifested there. same. you are absolutely right they said the second woman is possible, and

the prime minister, which is possible, one of the precedents for, i think, the british, in general, who profess. uh, case law is what's in the past. there was something similar, but it still means a lot and an appeal to this past in a good way. they want to increase their authority. leaning against this past. this is reasonable. it’s interesting, if you paraphrase johnson is fighting. you see, when she said, if putin were a woman, well, if a woman takes his place now, she will stop and bloodshed. yes, this is it, by the way, here in this video. it also seems to me that she claims to be the prime minister, not only of women, but also of men. that's it. it's not going to be good. well, here, i want to show you again. uh, question want to show the top, lord, well, the top. i mean they went out. in terms of. but , yes. here, yes, he confused me. well, look,

it means the top three. uh, ben wallace or from the penny mordon track, uh, everyone, as you understand , literally russophiles adore russia, fanatics, so to speak? over our country, although here to say, by the way, to say exactly boris johnson remember how he said repeatedly. actually, i'm a russophile. ugh i say. well, and so on. they don't even say it there. yes, everything is clear. yes, sasha, what do you want? i will continue to stand on the position that they will increase everything, so to speak, the pressure, because well, imagine that suddenly we now become an io. so it turns out the uk government until october. then some leader of the conservative party is elected. still there is less than a year of government, then elections, a completely different government. and when i just deal with the internal problems of their solution. but clear clear. branch so to speak. there, a boy in green is crying. so in ukraine so we are all engaged in the fight against bad russia all because the newcomers had someone to write off, maybe i didn’t recognize that either. well,

just how can the government assembled for 3 months are going there. well, in 3 months now , in 100 days, we will revive in the uk we will solve all the problems of the economy, of course, everything will be blamed on them. this is part of their political.

uh, there is still such a tradition within the same political culture, when people occupy high positions of the prime minister of britain, for example, a and start writing books about churchill's place . they are not only trying to cling to someone's glory. and yes, as mayor, he must have had some ambitions. he was no longer the last face of his party. yes, it could well be more that which, as it were, took place, but if there is a reverse trend in order to try to glorify your role your figure. ah, starting from their position, people begin to call everyone in their predecessors great. and even today, in our studio, the great margaret thatcher sounds and what are they great and what is great who said great well, yes, she was afraid of gorbachev

to the rest through gorbachev destroys the soviet union, she realized her national interest when she saw it ahead. she moved her economy forward. she came. we already know what ingratitude obeys her for this uh forward movement, friends, friends. now, in fact, thatcher and the iron lady itself could. just called workers. this, i think, is still being baptized with and meat actors, especially actors this time, and secondly, well, college, we talked about margaretcher and bone. we remembered this one, which means this is an image of a completely ridiculous tire, idiotic from pain from johnson, which means that if a woman would never get untied, then they report what she remembers, what she went down in history, among other things, margaret thatch, remember she was famous hunger strike, hunger strike, and no, the irish irish who were in prison. why is it not that they demanded a hunger strike, so that they would

be released there. no, they asked about there about the content, there and so on margaret thatcher the iron lady did not make any concessions margaret thatcher brought this hunger strike did not rise here to the death of several dozen people. they are not a modern hunger strike. here are these, well, yes, yes, funny irish, the irish are dead, the irish. the perished refused to take food, but the iron lady, she didn’t take a step to meet them , realizing what this threatens. she killed them, so this big hello. boris johnson about women. and so to speak, and that's it, it's easier plus ice, client islands and so on. by the way, yes, they, too, are members of the british cabinet for a meeting with johnson, and it will begin at 17:00 moscow time, they want to set a number of rules for him to emphasize that he is only acting as prime minister. so the females of these rules, he will not be able to go out without drinking. so, i think the main thing is to include

veche. everything will be clear, but in fact it turns out. they sorry wiped themselves again. well , he is retiring. well, the members of the cabinet are there, that is, he is retiring, but they will gather to say, boris, but let's be serious. i mean this conversation with you, let's define the rules, so here's the lunch break. yes, then this skating offends strangers, don’t drive, that is, instead of saying boris, you resign. go, we can appoint any current minister. actually. i just don't understand this political culture. i'm leaving for my father. here, let's go in october. yes sash here, uh, addition came robert bucklin new year's secretary for wales has suggested that the newly formed cabinet will block, for example, minister boris johnson if he tries to take serious political steps in the coming weeks. this is reported by the telegraph journalists on his twitter interestingly vasilyevich. please help this whole complex intrigue, so to speak, a common

highway. these are all our experts. i mean like vision, i had that that at all, that the policy would not change, well, the nuances bother me. e more from a military point of view, one such is important. remember the entry that is on command e of the british leadership. there, from youtube, this entry was deleted from everywhere, when our pranksters talked to ben wallace. yes, and they persuaded him there on behalf of ukraine they put it everywhere, removed it, but for real, yes, he said, he said. well, now, of course, we are not ready for a pri- i cannot be quoting accurately in a direct confrontation with russia a. then he thought and said. well, probably not now, perhaps in the next stage, that is, this character. and let's continue now vasilievich, let's listen, and ben wallace from maisky from may's theses from the very beginning. how sure are you that ukraine's attacks on russian territory are acceptable, and second? is it normal to

use british weapons at the same time? ukraine has an absolute right to take measures to protect against russian invasion . that is, it is absolutely logical. if you, as a nation , want to weaken the army, then you need to hit on supply chains that feed the russian military. otherwise, they cannot be stopped. a scot, yes, and if this character is given the opportunity to make decisions that will be implemented, he can really lead the world to a nuclear catastrophe, that is, it is precisely because of such people that we say that, in principle, a nuclear war. unfortunately, it is possible precisely because of such people who do not understand that jokes with countries with nuclear weapons can lead not only to a worldwide cataclysm, but to destruction our globe. well, yes, he is absolutely radical, so to speak, in relation to russia, we can’t try it on, does this mean that if there are

two out of three evils in our case, even out of five they choose less. but ben wallace is more i cross it out absolutely more so. and at least he is a little smarter, that second uh, there excuse me , just, well, somewhat limited in his education. it's good when the enemy is people, it suits us, it suits us. michael oryol oblast is right because he believes that ukraine is this is a victim of russian aggression, and he believes that, that is, ah, russian troops, did not come to ukraine the other way around, they even think that it is the source of these sources that needs to be stopped. this is the principle that the form directed by russia i think that russia is a clear power. yes. that's exactly what we are discussing, not just some kind of logical reasoning. we can afford everything in this

studio can afford abstract logical reasoning. but, when you are the minister of defense of a nuclear country, you once comment, so to speak, approaches to some other country, to another to the largest actually nuclear power. then, of course, each word must not only be weighed, but carefully weighed several times and, of course, it must be understood that any such, as it were, is a logical consideration of an abstract nature. it will be perceived exclusively as, uh, either as a provocation, you know, or as a direct appeal, but i think that after all, the post of minister obliges, he passes off desire for real. i don't know there is a continuation of this quote, but i'm sure that ben-molost knows perfectly well with whom he is dealing, and he is not dealing with powers, and he and he is the hands of ukraine they are fighting with the hands of ukraine. he also said about ukraine that it is not about himself that english missiles can hit our civilians. and how, but if, in fact, what i said at the beginning of the program is that provocation until october, which can

save johnson, you understand? that is, they will incite to incite ukraine there is something terrible to do and then they will say. oh look, i can’t leave the captain’s bridge at this moment, because the world blazes, well then, ukraine the region doesn’t give a damn about ukraine, and then tell the scenario when ukraine won’t lose for sure. well, well, all the same, ukraine will lose something, something, operations with russia are a very important point. we have now taken some of the statements of ben wallace, but i will remind you when he talked to the pranks. yes, he did not rule out, and at the next some kind of next stage in his brain there is such a direct confrontation between the armed forces of great britain and the russian federation. here i perceive it as a russian officer, this is a direct challenge to me throwing the glove. he said

that i do not rule out that we will fight directly on the other side. vasilievich no, everything is correct, but on the other hand. why did the british ask to remove it from everywhere, clean it out, so that it would not be anywhere in any case, well, that is, i also understand this, crazy clown. he's the defense minister of a nuclear power that claims to be. well for some let a little some place some dominance for roller feathers she claims like we said mission, mission u them is impossible. this is understandable, but they pretend to not call him alexander, you are right . absolutely. they told him it is not permissible to make such statements at all. it's clear so now to climb there to read, because this is very intriguing brought from alexander nikolayevich wanted to comment, in short, to make, well, very short. and what, and it’s so scary, uh, you’re pulling to express something, generally speaking, you need to express as little as possible, especially when you have defense, you need to do more.

and silently, like, i think, i think that if zelensky at one time did not say about nuclear ambitions, which are absolutely unrealistic at that time and in the near future, maybe. the reaction would have been calmer, why did you have to say this, you have to work and create. eh, to announce this nuclear silently, and not to announce what you don't have. although, although there is more? yes, although there are, by the way, examples of iran. it is not always so to say. u can just painlessly also talks a lot, in fact the college was talking about land he called u prime minister of the uk boris johnson is a real friend of ukraine, adding that he is confident that the uk's policy regarding the independent will not change in the near future, despite the resignation of jongsan, it turns out that there is no need to fix it at all. this is, uh, for the first time in history, we have an absolute consensus and we completely and completely agree with volodymyr zelensky , the president of ukraine, that the policy of britain as a whole

and britain will not change is another matter. what is it to say? this is, in my opinion, not a valuable event in itself. and this is a must see. i'm sorry in general, so to speak. snow it distances, as it should be to look at a large look at europe, you understand, this is one of, how to say, this is one of one of the zōšek. so to speak, curly already, so to speak, growing from a chain of events. look what's happening in holland in the netherlands look what's happening in germany uh-huh look at europe in general, if in the context of the general european turbulence that is happening, so to speak, then this matters in itself. but listen well, it's just really this part of the element, so to say the habitual, rather political culture of the island. but in the context it is a little more. let’s fast forward, for example, i don’t know in germany, please, the chancellor, who confuses cause and effect, should, like the british example, johnson, be asked to resign , you pour buckets of sanctions and are surprised, when

russia initiates countermeasures, economic sanctions against russia affect, but we have a population . this is a complete failure of the government. these are not three, uh, comments that we lovingly found, so to speak. two of them wrote themselves. and here's what to say. now we are demonstrating and explaining. what is the situation in germany no such comments. there is simply no way for us to show all of them in comments both in social networks and in the comments. what is called under all kinds of publications, in particular, veld, and so on. these are thousands of thousands, if tens of thousands of similar ones of the same type do not know, this is a big question. another whole trend. trying to create, look, estonia i knew you'd laugh, but still. look, but the president of estonia, uh, too preparing to leave. uh, retired. estonia would like to joke to say, what to say, what to say, the super-effect of the marfino-moscow region is also thinking about laying down a little more. well, this is the most in scale, so that

it is comparable, but nonetheless. it was a joke marfin will normally live and prosper, that's a trend however a trend. by the way, say e girl from estonia who is thinking about resigning i repeat this common european trend to ignore. she probably can't. it is in this context to become. i force us to, e, comprehend everything that happens unconditionally. we have repeatedly spoken with you in this studio. e that the european union plus britain, they are still aware and have calmly realized themselves for centuries, moreover, there is integrity in public administration, if you look globally, and some patterns. uh, in one country some kind of conservative regime comes, you look and in all the others after some time the regimes are conservative, that is, uh, borrowing in the sphere of uh public administration is the alpha and omega of this kind of development. it is quite probable that, uh, uh, dominoes may fall, but you and i

have also come to the conclusion that the faces are changing, but the vector of politics remains. yes, and this is it. e, too, eh, must be taken into account when we talk about e the topic of certain personnel. uh, faces change the vector of politics remains also matters. what does it matter? maybe not decisive. well , sort of, yes, but why am i after all? the vector remains under one condition, all other things being equal as they say, well, that is, relatively speaking, if there is, if warmly, alexander nikolayevich thinks that this is to say, the topic is a little overheated. sorry for the witty pun. but, uh, in my opinion, all these people in holland, in the netherlands and in germany and in other european countries, do you understand the mass, yes, does it really change the growing discontent? yes , of course, faces. it changes someone goes into the composition, he comes. well, relationships and vectors. how else? well, obviously, that is. well, you don't have to be seven spans in the forehead to understand that there is a direct connection

between michael's deterioration in the standard of living of people in your country right in the states and some amazing paradox. uh, paradoxically, the interest of some far, far, far overseas territory. well, people are also about this, well, americans are not fools, tell me no, not fools. well, i just wanted to hear this, and president putin, because he can play for a long time, the patience, the patience of european americans, is very very short. remember, here is this phrase of tolstoy that there are two, but i will paraphrase some problems, please, but patience and time are two advantages of russian. war or space, but i'm about to say roughly. yes, this is the time to be patient. it's a direct feeling, it's a skin. russia is in this conflict of this time and the europeans do not have this patience, so let's look through the americans. but through here, wait, here's the most interesting thing for you to

say after the word. after how much, how much patience is enough. you know americans, tell me. i think in honor of 8 months. this patience will burst, tin eight months midterm elections for us governors. and after the change of power, reasonable people should come. yes, but it's the republicans who will ask your loved one, which means the president. uh, what all this money was spent on, you don’t have to say how the videos are walking on social networks, yes, where does the biden speak, who tells. how many billions have been spent on ukraine and the stickers show these slums near american cities, poverty, broken streets, houses and people ask behind the scenes biden. and why tens of billions there give birth, but for what? it's clear for the sake of cutting, but you're our president of the united states why do you spend there, they're here, well, he doesn't have an answer on the prompter, so

instead he means a cheat sheet. he keeps that it will violate the text, so to speak, and naturally. what you read there, when the cheat sheet of texts is out, naturally, it sounds significant that analysts, so to speak, e tend to interpret as significant silence. but in general, it's just really. without any jokes, really, very very important. very interesting. i'm sure for most europeans and americans said leo tolstoy favorite writer. michael paraphrase everything mixed up in the house with the west. this is a television program that is true and capable of destroying the enemy. we discuss here all the key events on all fronts. ideological and cultural premiere electronic

warfare on saturday on first here a very important history of melitopol unveiled a monument to a native of the city, pavel sudoplatov, a well-known officer of the soviet special services who liquidated the un leader banned in russia banned in russia the monument was erected on the day of the 115th anniversary of the payment here as part of the program of the russian military historical society to preserve the memory of outstanding fellow countrymen. as i understand it, well, here, too, you don’t have to be, so to speak, not newton’s binom, that it’s not easy, it’s not just that on the day of the 15th anniversary of platov’s trial , a bust was erected in his homeland. this, of course, is a completely unthinking direct, so to speak , symbolic act, which, if i correctly interpret it so to speak, tells us something about this in due time, we did not finish the fight this time with mistakes. dedov. we will not repeat. good afternoon, the

information channel continues its work on the air time to remember, my name is alexander gordon time to remember that yesterday in this studio at the same time. we predicted the resignation of at least boris johnson from the post of chairman of the party. it is very pleasant that our wishes come true so immediately. although, as we have already said in his place, someone may come and worse things happen, but we are not talking about him. god bless him. july 5 finland sweden signed an agreement on joining nato program. and when they were going to join the alliance, the governments of both countries somehow did not even think about whether to ask the people? but even if there, well, not a referendum in the full sense, well, at least there is a poll to conduct some kind of qualified. no, i want to let you hear the opinion of a finnish journalist about this.

no one asked the ufins for their opinion on nato membership. many people are very frightened, especially residents of the border regions. in finland today, the social networks of the opponents of the alliance were filled with calls to come to their senses to the government. finland already for several months in the press. there is propaganda about the need to join nato, custom-made articles are published on the pluses of such an entry and fake public opinion polls. everyone was simply intimidated by russia, i don’t recognize the finnish government in nato psychosis, whoever is not with us is against us. but in general, this is not news for the alliance. the fact is that for the entire time of its existence. uh, only six governments. we held a referendum in order to join nato, i list this spain czech republic macedonia-hungary slovenia and slovakia and so my first question to you dear experts. is it possible to make such a fateful decision? without knowing the will of the people or not? everything, this is very subjective

and depends solely on the country in which they got out where they showed it, that is, of course, and a referendum as such a direct plebiscite, today it is absolutely outgoing nature. well, in general, it depends on two factors. the first is historical traditions, the second is the number of your population, because it is obvious that the more it is, the more difficult it is to carry out. and this indeed, even an extended opinion poll is difficult to conduct, not like a referendum. and of course, it is assumed that in an electoral democracy you choose people you trust, and it is assumed that if you choose them, they will lead your country to where they really are, but in general it is worth leading it, for example, to the european union, for example, to nato, but at the same time, you need to understand that you are completely delegating your fate to these people even now. that is why such a large number of discussions about the legitimacy of the illegality of referendums because no one knows how to choose the right people who will then choose a vector for your country. after all, the most serious thing is to keep

under control the most developed democracies in the world today, if we talk about democracy, this is switzerland switzerland in switzerland yes, according to historical traditions, in switzerland there is a rotation of the president. there they sit for the weather, and in switzerland, on every occasion, the slightest thing will absolutely change the company that takes out the garbage in some of this aul is carried out by a referent. yes i want to say that these are scandalous situations. scandalous country makes, well, makes fateful decisions , joins the most powerful military-economic alliance, which is involved in many places in the world that require an increase in military presence money. sometimes a soldier and so on and so forth. that is, it touches, potentially,

every inhabitant of the same finland and suddenly announces that they have been part of this alliance, so to speak, for decades. the resisters enjoyed their neutral status, getting all the economic benefits. and suddenly he says to them guys. so tomorrow we will be there somewhere in laos, and you will send your army, your troops, your finances, there and so on. this is a scandalous violation of one of the most fundamental principles of democracy. i heard you. thank you, i object to scandalous violations and about polls. i remind you that surveys in the scandinavian countries are conducted regularly. they are trusted by almost the entire political spectrum of society, which, by the way, is represented in parliament from extreme nationalists yes, communists and pacifists. and if you watch it regularly surveys conducted over the past year. we will see how support for joining nato grew from 20-25 to 670. and even 80%. i want to say that the scandinavian political system is as

representative as possible both in parliament and on the street. in contrast. unfortunately, from our home country where it sits. one point of view of the fens is also to the scandinavian list finns are also a scandinavian country, are allies and partners of the rest, four or five, according to various estimates, of the scandinavian countries. i want to say last, if this point of view were not really supported by the people, then we would have seen protests over the past many months, and political actions that were not there. and the last thing is, unfortunately, we do not have empathy in the country. try to imagine yourself living in a small scandinavian country next to a soaked aggressive neighbor who used to be. yes , enjoy neutrality. and now he probably does not want to return on the other side. you can look at it from the side of common sense. here you were not target. but you have become a target. here you were

neutral, and now a weapon is aimed at you, and now you have protection. look at this protection you. now to this defense, how they defend ukraine. go, try yes, stop what are you talking about, no one in this nato alliance will ever go into open confrontation. do you remember that in russia there are nuclear weapons, and they don’t have them too , but they are suicidal and they they are not suicidal for this calculation of scandinavia i want to say, but i don’t want to remind you that they immediately this, but cotton wool, we are in eternal life of the word of one of the respected people. you would like yes alexander, and ideally, of course, it would be better if i agree that you personally would not have alexander. there are no doubts about the will, and the land of the people, and that you are not only you, so that in russia they would not talk about what , well, questions and stuffing, although i don’t know

where they got it from, that the questions are final stuffing, so that we don’t said, this is a finnish journalist said, ah, so that you don't say that you didn't say what it is? rodnyak between biden in spite of the desire of the people so that you do not point them at preten, and thus it would be better if it were a friend and the question that i am sure that the referendum, uh, would show that they supported it, but i will remind you. e you that, and when there was a reunification of germany there was no referendum. did you have any doubt that the gdr wanted to reunite with the west of course not. i want to say the same thing, but you understand that the finals are almost already, but i was a member of nato before that. how many military exercises before this? and they have almost entered nato. that is, this is not a surprise. this is what they are it turns out. now it's just a guarantee of the fifth article, i see. yes, i just want to answer

andrei. but it seems to me, andrei and i hope that you will agree with me that the decision is a strategic decision. the strategic choice of the country, which is based on fear on phobias on the expectation of some catastrophic things - this is all irrational, you must agree that there must be something rational in the basis. no, yes, you know, yes, because no. well, you know, any fear, any fear excludes the mind, you know, either instinct or fear. here, if you do not start correctly, then the mind turns off. this is the first second about questions. i didn't see anything. now there is. here are some polls right now. here they should be. here is about nato. how much regularity is just a week last year and yes we can that's when when this story was forced there was some kind of poll. now there is a poll. you can bring it to me, it seems to me that you are being disingenuous. as a

well-known and respected journalist, you are perfectly aware of the regular ones. okay let's move on okay okay? so it won't look. i want to say yes reference that the last poll the last poll was in april and there is a majority of 70%. yes, she wanted to join, of course, but so, why not hold a referendum if it is absolutely safe for the government to decide? what one more minute? yes, you can tell the time of which the time of the approach of our rocket is the time of which see four months of figuring out, they never entered it into this blog. yes, and here they can't wait 3-4 months. what kind of hysteria? it is, yes. we ourselves still literally need a referendum. now a little later or not. one side. i agree with andrew michael and that's all that was said. i can come to this unit, but on the other hand. i believe that the referendum is more or less large societies. i in this case a little bit of scandinavia

does not make the slightest sense. i gave up a long time ago with the illusion that naruto is the source of power and very sovereignty is nothing like he is, but it's a long story, dating back to the french revolution and i've read a lot. and here, which means, accordingly, it is obvious to me that people, first of all, are subject to manipulation. here's what we see almost every day. but on the other hand, they have been saying for quite a long time, uh, serious scientists that you are from 80 to 85%, uh, of the people are deprived of independent thinking and critical thinking, and therefore what is the point of wasting money and time, indeed, she polled their opinion, but just a flock of sheep. yes, of course, beyond all the same . let's not decide. uh, this dispute and no way, except experimental.

god forbid, but nonetheless. i think that if would relatively speaking in 2008, yes, ukraine would become a member of nato that no today's events, there would have happened. it is clear your point of view does not change. it's good. wait my friends, still a referendum before he is sentenced. here are the last 20 years to oblivion. and why quite a long time was still part of the world democracy to learn about the opinions of the population. it was considered correct. now it doesn't count anymore, but come on . in retrospect, let's try to remember how it was. on the 16th, we knocked on the door of our own mother hurray opened the door we are glad you are the most sincere

joy of the crimeans in march 2014, the collective west ignored the results of the referendum, according to which 97% of crimeans voted for the annexation of the peninsula to russia, leeches in 83%. in those days western serpents seemed to compete in sharp headlines, telling their readers that the vote on the peninsula was illegal, by force and even at muzzle-machine guns, and the world's leading powers were quick to declare their non- recognition of the referendum results by calling the return annexation of crimea to the russian federation , the referendum will not be legal according to the ukrainian constitution and, accordingly, will not be recognized by the united states as our allies and partners it is clear that the international community is not going to recognize this illegal and illegitimate referent, the referendum does not comply with international law. here. why france, like the european union, does not recognize the validity of this pseudo-referendum as illegal in the west. considered the fact that

the referendum held on march 16, 2014 should not have been held among inhabitants of the peninsula, and to be all-ukrainian is that crimea was part of ukraine as an autonomous republic with its own government and parliament. it turned out to be allegedly insufficient and western policy hastened to consolidate its position documented on march 27 , 2014 by the general assembly. he adopted a resolution in which he stated that the referendum in the crimea has no legal force and cannot serve as a basis for changing the status of the peninsula. although a quarter of a century ago, western politicians actively promoted the principle of the right to self-determination further its higher principles of territorial integrity. their goal was obvious on the horizon loomed the collapse of the soviet union and to support the leaders of the movements who advocated the separation of their republics from the ussr was considered a good deed. in october 2017, the catalan authorities held a referendum on secession from spain, 90% of the catalans voted for this, but in

madrid the results of the referendum refused to recognize the secession of one of the most prosperous regions of spain would give rise to a lot of problems. 1979. they were able to achieve autonomy and the official status of the catalan language, but spain is a unitary state. whose constitution does not imply self-determination of the regions, the argument of the supporters of independence that international law takes precedence over national law is not heard in spain or in the european union, the european commission hastened to support madrid by putting at the head not the international right of the people to self-determination, but the spanish constitution i have always exhausted the situation in catalonia internal question of spain which should be decided in accordance with the constitutional order. however, modern history also knows cases when the desire for self-determination became more important than compliance with the border of laws. if it was in the

interests of a third country in 2008, the obedient recognition of the independence of the republic of kosovo by western countries was closely watched in the world by the balkan card, the united states tried to play for many years. yugoslavia has been seething since the late eighties, its member republics held referendums one after another in 1991 neighboring albania declared its independence and kosovo immediately recognized its right to self-determination, but yugoslavia was not going to let go of its land in the region, armed clashes began in 1999, the bloc intervened after the massive bombing of belgrade. and other cities. serbian, the government was forced to agree to the introduction of the alliance military contingent into the oblique and the transfer of the region under un control in february 2008. serbia, based on the fact that the majority of the population were albanians, the region is located on the border between serbia and albania and for

most of the 20th century. kosovo was part of serbia on the basis of autonomy in response to the us administration said that secession complies with world legal norms and is an expression of the will of the kosovo people, we call on all countries to leave behind the issue of status, kosovo and act constructively in support of peace and stability in the balkans. we call on countries that have not yet done so to recognize kosovo as different in words, the united states practically gave the republic of kosovo independence even without holding a corresponding referendum in return, big sam wanted not so much to place his large military base on the territory of kosovo. and now look, we will now come to one topic that is very important. it seems to me modern politics. indeed all peoples have the right to self-determination by virtue of this right. they freely determine their political status and so on and so forth and so on. it's gone background. but one can. but others can’t, and that’s who decides who

can and who can't? what do you think, i don't think, in this case, i know as an international lawyer. i also know that everyone refers to international law. when in general you need to refer to something, and since you all know pretty badly, is there always a chance that you will get somewhere? and as for this epic absolutely popular opposition. so what is higher, the principle of the right of peoples to self-determination and for all it works or not for everyone, or is it still the principle of territorial integrity states, i answer, these two principles should coexist equally, like all the rest of the principles, of which we have 10 actually, which means in an ideal format, which almost never happens, but in fact, and all charters are written. for more or less stable ideal situations. eh, everything should look like this. we have, and a certain pool of sovereign.

which practically does not change its borders, and within which a huge number of peoples live in peace and prosperity, that is, the principle of self-determination in the un context is completely does not mean the right to immediate secession, because in this case we would have as many states as nations. and this is according to most ethnographers. well, somewhere around 5-7.000 it is obvious that the planet earth has 5-7.000 states. well , it’s just that for economic and technical reasons they won’t survive in any way, but i’ll emphasize this is an ideal situation, but sometimes we have a moment when, for example, they begin. how did it happen? and at one time in ukraine, basic human rights were violated, and the principle of respect for human rights is another a principle that is very often forgotten, but the un and what is happening in this case, but there is actually a contradiction within a sovereign state and people begin to defend their human rights. internally, it happened in

catalonia, it happened in ukraine, and no one can ever vouch for the result, because it is obvious that the central government will always try not to let go of some national identity. free floating. and this identity will be fought in every possible way. how did the basques do it how did the irish the republican army, and so on and so forth, therefore, moreover, he emphasized that this is all that we have from the point of view of international law, but there are no rules, especially condensed ones, in which it is written that god is god to caesar, caesar's locksmith, locksmith. no, quite simply, that is, no one knows how right. because you have to look, and ben's constitution is statute, and then he will have to draw conclusions that correspond right in this studio. yes, i repeat, the criterion is how deeply this decision affects each resident. if the separation, for example, from the country concerns every inhabitant, this is both the language and the economy, there and in

where does it all come from, each person will be hurt, who? so it is necessary to hold a referendum, even if this state does not want and resists secession. the catalans held a referendum held that there is a plan said fuck you everything is happening here, because we have a hegemot, and he has his own bitches and other bitches, some allow others not here or not. i continue to adhere to the point of view that either the behemoth is not from or he is extremely unqualified, but the point is that you asked questions about who actually decides, and in the absence of clear legs , what is always called real politics and the balance of power decides. and if we assume the situation with kosovo well, why for some reason after the first uh, world war it was erroneous to realize the conditions after the second world war. it

was mistakenly saved. well, it means that once this mistake had to be corrected. here it was corrected by this very thing, but it is not a matter of will, of the albanian or kosovo population. but the fact that this error should have been corrected. and exactly the same thing happened with the donbass. only on the other side. so, the ukrainians are not in the fourteenth. not in the fifteenth year failed to liquidate. here. the resistance that lay down that the creation of the ukrainian state from your point of view was a mistake, and we are now disentangling. uh the results of this error. yes, everything, in general, is quite complicated, which means it was a mistake in 901 . i am not yet the ninety-first year was the result of absolutely natural processes was extended what ukraine has done that has not suppressed. e, the speech of donetsk and luhansk, e, then in the

fourteenth and fifteenth year, there were not enough forces, but the right of the nation to self-determination, on the one hand, the right of the state, the inviolability of borders, is the quadrature of the circle on a world scale and each specific case is separate. on the basis of which, on the basis of the will and statement of the so -called world community and world legislation, which is built as it is written on the law of applicants and each specific case, please, i didn’t interrupt you, but they are unique within the framework of the legislation, they are passing a referendum on the independence of quebec and scotland. and if they pass once they will be recognized by both canada and england accordingly, catalonia will be recognized will be recognized because they go within the framework of the law, unlike the catalan referendum, which violated spanish and catalan law. each specific case each country, if it is recognized by a significant majority of the world community , receives independence exactly, as well as

almost all countries on our globe were formed, if one and a half cripples recognize it, then it will remain so. sorry depressive dependent on sponsors actually independent education actually dependent on education is good. yes, and you say, now you also talked about taiwan, an unrecognized state. taiwan sat on the security council. he he was china and was recognized until 745. china was this same unique no why those laws that you quoted international and in the laws of those countries. you mentioned, ah, it's still hard to figure out what self-determination is, but the soviet constitution spelled out the right of nations to self-determination, up to secession. well, if they wrote it like that and that's it, no one would give a copy . of course, you know, in fact, that's what kirov lvovna said about the fact that they

should coexist, the thing is that they don't get along very well. yes, he has the right to evaluate for self-determination of his principle of territorial integrity and inviolability of the border. such an explosive mixture that constantly explodes in this sense, of course, but international law. unfortunately, here, after the war, i was born with such a severe birth trauma that it is impossible to live. so the question arises, when there are conditionally two teams, one screams, the main thing is the right. nations for self-determination others shout no. territorial integrity, inviolability of borders, and here they are, pulling the blanket over themselves, whoever wins , the team with more wins, but big serious players who can somehow relay you understand this idea, so say, but he does not add a formal one. wait if talking about the product. yes wait michael please tell me texas who wants to

secede from the us can he secede no way no way the same if the point is that according to the constitution it can't be the same in russia but if karelia wanted to hold a referendum, how moscow would have reacted, they would have said no way, no way and the truth and rightly did the same as the us is a universal rule and in england it was an exception to the right when england gave e velikole and why an explanation and so on texas here. well, they're trying, but i understand it's against it, if they succeed, as long as it's a civil war. this is not provided for, not a single state has the right to the constitution, as we also stipulate them in russia. we are now talking about laws. we are talking about the constitution , you assume that we are dealing, well, either on the battlefield or in economic relations, or in politics with partners equal, but not all partners consider others equal. wow, the west at all

never hid the use of a policy of double standards. i will now ask for a video of you british diplomat, former adviser to prime minister tony blair robert cooper yes, he created the doctrine, and here is a quote from this doctrine. for the postmodern state there is a difficulty we are forced to use double standards among ourselves. we operate on the basis of the laws of open joint security, but when we are dealing with more old-fashioned types of states. we need to return to the brute method of the early era of force, preemptive attack deceit everything that is necessary for those who still live according to the rules of the last century among themselves. we keep the law. but when we operate in the jungle, we must use the laws of the jungle. as soon as well , the truth is, the bears go into the jungle, but the russian bear sticks its head out of the jungle and says, well,

let's talk, kicks go back to the jungle. who are you to talk to you, you can be punished, deceived, imposed with sanctions, we can agree among ourselves, but these non-humans back there in the jungle are again not like that. and as i reminded you lewis's novel was lost on treasure island. there were two groups of gentlemen and pirates gentlemen among themselves in their circle. they could communicate according to their own laws, but communicating with pirates. it would be strange if they observed this morality, because the opponent plays by completely different rules. and if you sell, you give him a hand, he will chop it off your body with a crocodile appetite, by the way, the state has exactly the same morality. why speak? let's remember yes, the nineties have passed, 2,000 have come. it's been a while scientific of these years and we sat at the same table with them. they looked into our eyes. they accepted

us as equal partners, that it all changed in the fourteenth year in this quote, which you cited, there is not a word about russia and russia then in the zero year was a respected member of the world community, sat at all forums and all western leaders were ours friends. it is said correctly asian its partly south american and indeed. how are you in south sudan with people who don't speak well. even writing will be to prove to them human rights, the helsinki agreements or you know. here is your rhetoric. now it reminds me of israel's rhetoric about tolestine in exactly the same way we are people. here we are educated, we are talented. we are good peasants with chess players. won. what kind of economy we have created, and these are half beasts. they do not understand what we want, and we want good for them, but this is what we behave differently in syria or we are

legal in afghanistan with the permission of the government in syria, but the first second in syria, we are not at war with the people somehow. yes, we are at war with the trash that has gathered there so that there are no series and trash - this is not how it finances in the united states. and if half of ours is, andrey promised you well , look, let's talk calmly. so you say gentlemen and pirate. don't you think that those who call themselves gentlemen. they called themselves that. well, let's say seven. are they gentlemen or not? or is it people who play what they are jenner you can name these leaders who are gentle we are for whom they are the elements called lindens are called integrate. andrew i mean. no come on come on. oh, oh, about their behavior after february 24, when everything went down the drain. here you can call them gentlemen. they're crazies. they don't play against

themselves. understand the obligations of their obligations, the second thing is that the gentleman is gone. and this is the phrase, by the way. uh, quote, yes, where did he say postmodern states, but does anyone understand what a postmodern state is, where it is spelled out somewhere there is it put out. no, you see, this is slavis, who, who is called upon, actually hides the desire to get away from all the red lines from everyone. uh, international law rules. not by chance. see say the rules international rules right is gone and international rules. yes, because it is attributed in some post to the state, and therefore, to the post-modernist state, and already alexander nikolayevich spoke about the real politician. so the problem is that there is no alexander nikolayevich left now. and unreal will fly here's the thing, it's all figured out, so i say you evaluate. well, probably they will agree with you, in some psychologists or sociologists,

so low, and the opinion of any people, since most of the population is people with low iq are not able to make decisions themselves, then we must agree that today, except for one, two world leaders in this the world. there is no one. who would understand what real politics is, and who and who does not understand it at all. nobody understands this. putin understands the collective i understand yes now. yes, we forget. at what point we are discussing all this changes. the entire geopolitical structure of society was established earlier, as we know, by the americans. these are the so-called hegemonies. yes, they are, so to speak, at the top of the pyramid below them. here the europeans gave. that's all changing one center, which decided can i give? in the sense it is necessary not to give or not a preference, and then it goes away, disappears, a multipolar world appears.

c. at least five centers, and hence the problem, what rules will we play now, when this hegemon has fled from afghanistan flees from iraq there, and so on, when china appeared, whose economy is larger than the american one, and when russia exists with all this power, and so on , this whole thing changes and a new rule arises. but what this world will be like after that largely depends on us to eat and agree, but sit down and agree something on the basis of equal partnership. they are right here. they are that they will come to us in the jungle and will knock on our heads with a club. and maybe change now to answer now. just the main uh, shall we say, legal contrast. to a legal controversy, that's what we're all going through right now. this is actually. this is the fundamental difference between

rule-based order. this is what is now in recent years, there 7-10 is promoting the collective west. and what causes justified concern among the whole world is the rules and the second - this is actually. here is the classic international law, which was formed on the basis of the balance of power following the war, and which we know as the second world war. and here, in fact. now we don't have for someone to win out of these two antagonists, most likely there will be a third, but a compromise option following some huge , serious geopolitical upheaval, but really, when we spoke at all. well, yes, of course, we just don’t see it, but historical examples, when our system of international relations and the accompanying system of international law would change in an evolutionary way through negotiations. through some kind of balance of power and so on, yes, but unfortunately it is connected with blood and any real redistribution, it is power redistribution and actually that's why i never

understood. why international law opposes the non-use of force to this principle. this is simply not true, because international law, just the way it was in the forty-fifth year, and in the fixed format, this was put by the league of timation of the power alignment that was at that time, but it’s just that moment we had it, and then it happened in the ninety-first year and for 30 years. here is the container. giving injury. she just stretched out. and in fact, what is happening now is a postponed one, as if the process associated with the alteration of the soviet union had taken place, but the plates could not be resolved yet. and now this shift has occurred, the world is shaking. i would not joyfully state, answering you about the fact that the hegemon we have in our world is leaving. it's like being glad that there is a planet in our little crazy house. the land left the head doctor and orderlies and gave us the largest ward there. we're far away. not the most violent and active patient and the same china that you are they mentioned that if there is no hegemon, and we have china

, there may be a conflict, to whom we will go to complain for help, we will show nuclear missiles, they will show their e, there are more of them. they are stronger, so i would not be glad that there is no controller on the planet earth, breeding the surrounding philosophy thinks the future is near us. turkey central asia which blazes regularly japan china iran they all look at us and many of them really have claims to territorial economic beautiful and without a hegemon. and without some kind of world control and without paper contracts that protect our borders are still walking. here we don't need it. wait, why was it created? united nations why was the security council of this organization created so that it would play the role of such a collective hegemon. and if any showdowns happen,

yes, so that he breeds people, why do you think this role should go to the united states in the united states, which proved their aggressiveness to the whole world after the second world war. count the number of wars that they waged that the liberation wars of the electronic forces of the alternative. they do not turn around, we will definitely talk, definitely. look at turkey when they need bombing. they bomb without any un security council and the same, i elect. it's not only the usa we started talking about the counterpart of america's standard e and i want to say favorite topic. and i want to say that for the sake of wavy, of course, for everyone and for russia. be healthy. here even these studios, as well as the type showed, because you uh, well, in russia they reproach the west for joining nato in the finals without but, but i won’t shut you up. just temporarily. of course not. let's make it a

separate topic. in anthropology there is such a thing as a gotentot apron, it’s just that in this south african tribe fat is collected in this way on the stomach, what goes down, creating such an apron, sometimes right up to the knees, and i knew about this from school. but the fact that there is an expression for political science, gotentot morality, i did not know. do you know what it is? at the beginning of the 20th century, after the suppression of speeches farmers from the gotentot tribe. yes, someone asked them a white missionary, asked what is bad it says bad. this is, when a neighbor attacks me, he will take away the livestock of his wife, okay, and what then is good, he says well, this is when i attack a neighbor, i will take away his exodus and his wife. it seems to me

that the time is coming when we will have to linger in this morality. the information channel on the first continues its broadcast program. time will tell we are working live yesterday boris johnson announced that he was not going to go to resignation. and just a few minutes ago it became known that after all resigned. today he will submit it, sky new tv channel reports , moreover, today he is preparing an appeal to the nation, where, in fact, he will talk about what happened literally over 50 members of the government in hmm a day. they left their posts, and some managed to do it twice, and johnsn's rate is connected with the ex-scandal, in which one of his close ministers is involved. let's see how the parliament session went yesterday. minister was accused of sexually assaulting a young man. i want to quote the victim's testimony. he says the next he took

me by the ass, then slowly began to move his hand to my groin. i froze. i know this is not easy to hear, but it should remind all those who support this prime minister how serious this is. he knew that the accused minister had previously been seen in similar obsessive behavior, but he promoted him , despite this why he is in power. only because he was propped up by a corrupt party for several months. so it's not a case of just changing top pieces anymore. is the bride that the only way for the country to start a new life that she deserves to get rid of many of them. what is this about? worry? mr. difference the difference between yes friends could imagine that uh in the uk in the 21st century in parliament they will

discuss how ministers unzip some man's fly at work, but nevertheless. no, he is discussing it in all seriousness, and moreover, now there is a statement from well, a message from reuters that, for the time being, british prime minister boris johnson spoke to the queen out of courtesy. uh, before officially announcing his rate and something goes wrong on the island, but there is still a story going on boris johnson, although he already declares his intention to resign, it is reported that he plans to still hold his post in october until the autumn. during this time, a lot. what can happen. i don’t know what it is designed for, the fly will fasten, maybe something else will happen, but that's the way the uk is, meanwhile the british are sounding the alarm about the success of the russian army. naturally, of course, we cannot but link the resignation of boris jones with what is happening in ukraine and how this affects the economy in general in the world in particular in the uk. but british intelligence is sounding the alarm. about the successes of the russian army, they call a new point at which the battle for donbass will take place listen

to the official statement of the british minister of defense russian troops from eastern and western groupings of troops are now concentrated about 16 km north of slovyansk, there is a real possibility that the battle for the city will become the next key confrontation in the battle for donbass well, the open secret has been revealed to us. yes , the battle for slavyansk is next, otherwise we didn’t know here, uh, well, in the uk, by the way, they might not have known, but first let me remind you, severodonetsk was a key city where the fate of donbass was decided later, lisichansk is now, slavyansk will continue , kramatorsk and then, well, according to the list let's see, we're now on direct communication special correspondent of the holding, komsomolskaya pravda, dmitry steshin dmitry hello, well, well, you probably know the news from the uk and about boris johnson, and here's revelation of the secret data that british intelligence revealed about the battle for slavyansk will there really be a battle for slavyansk dmitry i want to

ask you, yes, do not forget. we can ask the federal a little bit to move the camera a little, perhaps, uh, something with the internet yes, we will continue no from you, most likely the last the battle is in this part of the company, the slavic agglomeration. not only there, the city of slavyansk is there konstantinovka druzhkovskaya. druzhkovka kramatorsk nikolaevka, that is, well, such a huge cluster of settlements that have merged into one industrial zone and it will be, well, a really difficult battle, and i have one. eh, feelings. there is an opinion that they will not be released from there. it's so easy when he leaves, if now, well, if now the component, why uh, they left heavy weapons equipment there, but we saved the city, well, probably in

the last battle in the donbas already. no one will be sorry. well, the last battle for the donbass well , objectively, yes, then it is, in fact, after the seversk and slavic agglomerations, they will cling more to the donbass for nothing, and the hills were lying about the landing, everything is in mind, they can say that kiev will be the last battle for the donbass lvov will be the last battle for the donbass well, as it were, so that they are advancing in the opposite direction, as they say. well, yes, well, it’s in the style of goebbels’ diaries, i was listening to it on the berlin radio new fans. the headlights are april forty-fifth, the vanderwafs are waiting, how can this information from the uk be reflected in the fronts and whether it is reflected or does it not affect at all, in your opinion? it does not affect everything goes according to its routine according to plans. well, here, the only thing i was on the front line under the city is very close. this is marinka, aleksandrovka, where ours are recaptured from the armed forces,

the positions do not move, because the next line of defense is completely concreted. there even know around the trees in the concrete, that is the trees they just kept a trench passing by these concreted trees, and i understand that our troops raised that these fortified areas were to be stormed. no, well, they are bypassed from above through carbon. so they themselves will leave them when they realize that they will find themselves in the next boiler. but it will be a very large cauldron and the last cauldron. i hope there will be a battle for seversk or, nevertheless, seversk will be surrendered, because there are already disputes and discussions on this matter, some say that there will be a battle for seversk - this has moved away somewhere. if now some say that go further immediately to slavyansk kramatorsk konstantinovka what do you think? i will assume that i think that the same way as i will say now. why cling to lisichansk if you can retreat to seversk, why cling to seversk if we are all there , the slavs have gathered and there we will give a decisive

battle to the royal hordes, well, with us, in the sense, we will claw our mongol. yes, and orcs, whatever they call us. but let's try to reason, and the battle of zaslavin will be a battle. like here, if compared with mariupol in terms of time by complexity by destruction by victims, can it be compared or not? i just melt for almost 3 months in the garden, which means that there is practically no high-rise buildings in the city, in general there is a dominant mountain from mariupol. karachun well, there are unpleasant industrial zones. here, uh, there are water barriers, there are mud lakes and so on, but in general, well, nothing complicated, of course. uh, mariupol was more difficult mariupol azov steel plant. well, then how are they going to give us a pitched battle. eh, even if mariupol could not be kept as

planned. well, although there were no goals before eurovision, there were others. well, according to them, they prepared the city for defense for 8 years, what they prepared there, it’s hard to say, they perfectly reported that the population is not loyal to them in slavyansk. therefore, they were constantly brought there, which means that some kind of concert brigades of western ukraine brainwashed the children. well , at sechansk judging by the way our people were greeted, well, it’s clear that this is, but inside it doesn’t work the same way. of course of course. yes, this is the city of this rebellion from which we were forced to leave. i'm with everyone i can say with responsibility that i believe that it was the right step to withdraw our troops. e exactly 8 years ago from this agglomeration. we would not have stayed there, well, then simply,

they kept slavyansk so that there would be time for the militia to concentrate forces for the defense of donbass, and just the heroic defense of slavyansk allowed our fighters. well, to form combat-ready units and then retreat and ours were not allowed to take, donetsk is the most important thing. but moreover, in slavyansk, donetsk, fired people came, angry , serious, a motivational background arose, because, well, donetsk was a little relaxed. sorry for this word at that moment, but then people returned, smelling of gunpowder. everything rolled. do you remember the capture there in the summer, 14. thank you very much dmitry steshin was in direct contact with us with the details, and the special correspondent of the holding, komsomolskaya pravda. and now he also believes, like many people who work there on the ground, that there will be no battle in seversk, despite the fact that ukrainian propaganda is actively giving out the north as the next point of a big battle, but in uk intelligence says slavyansk will be

watched soon. i think the situation will clear up, in the meantime, news from the uk that is not directly related to the resignation of boris johnson but, nevertheless, is important for the conduct of our special military operation. the uk has deployed the sky saber air defense system in poland. probably what this means to you , it means that johnson is trying to aggravate the conflict as much as possible before his resignation. johnson has already decided everything about himself and about the situation itself. i also decided with ukraine. everything is already moving there, besides him. although let's just, ah, let's note that you, if you try to name at least one british prime minister, who pursued a policy that was not vile and even a word not scottish. i just don't know when you name someone, because since, uh, mrs. thatcher's lord, all the premieres have been the same, how is he different from my teresa or from tony blair, who lied with a blue eye about what, uh,

means, uh, saddam hussein has an iraqi army. uh, chemical weapons, yes, that is and who is this man, he understood everything for himself. he played this and this topic. the british intelligence agencies really moved the american ones in terms of control of the power structures of ukraine. but this situation will go beyond him, but it should be noted. of course, the paradigm will change, that is, the main russophobia will not change. uh, attitudes towards russia and attitudes towards what is happening in ukraine, but it is possible that his successor is even impossible. most likely, he will deal with internal problems. jones at johnson uh, you know what it's like johnson's behavior now is the behavior of those who are sitting in avdiivka, these scum gunners who are shelling. yes, somewhat wonderful. you know they won't achieve anything. yes, but they will inflict damage on just peaceful people, and this

bastard behaves the same way. here, look who their teacher is and you pavlovich yes, the logic in your words is new. look, if johnson remains within the limits until october and manages, his hands are untied for everything. he already knows for sure that no matter what he does, it will not be worse for him, and he until october. there is still plenty of time. how much blood can be spilled, what else can he do? isn't that why they leave him until october? well, firstly, now let's see what will happen to him, but uh, even though, in principle, of course, the policy of britain is so clearly russophobic, and the role of the individual in history still u matters. and, of course, johnson is fighting. i think it will be very painful for ukraine to lose simply, because he is ukraine phil, even against the background, in principle, of a very ukrainian-philic policy. today the heads of the leading e western states, because what, and all these jokes, and in social networks about boris

dzhinnyuk, cakes in his honor, he became the first, and the british prime minister, who spoke in just the same kiev parliament, and so on and so forth. he came many times, he, and he is not in close contact with vladimir zelensky. therefore, in this sense. i think, of course, as his swan song, most of uh, his actions. it will be so in favor of ukraine, he will now, of course, try to the maximum, but to make this mess after himself and will. to the difficulty of accepting a successor to leave, of course, his e successors. and one more very important point is about the fact that british intelligence periodically leaks there, which, as you know, they forget documents and so on and so forth at stops, well, firstly, what leaked, most likely, when something then it leaks from intelligence, it leaks. consciously reception, in general, a popular distraction. as for getting into the information space. i associate with the fact that by and large. i think for the british

viewer and reader are all these names that we pronounce so often and which for us are associated with specific experiences with bloody pain. e from the slavs from kramatorsk raisins kherson all these directions, that is, which immediately cause very active associative series, and so on, even from people who were not there, they don’t call the british, in general, they can take nothing just from the map, any name, which is within, and ukraine and they will believe on this topic and no one will say anything. everybody just friendly. it seems to me that they will applaud and say yes, yes, yes, but if our intelligence said, then it will be so . guess the tune, who's the daily mail calling the new candidate? well, yes, that's right, a woman, what kind of woman? the one that well, let's, let's, offer no. guys so it was before this new candidate. there is a third woman that the third

candidate is the third woman more? who is teresa? oh yes, it's hard to believe that theresa may is also the british prime minister and tells the daily mail that she will probably become the new old candidate for the post of prime minister. but if you remember, well, yes, firstly, thank you, we picked up good photos for this news. uh, teresa mat reacted like this, not very happy, probably, considering the fact that boris johnson is setting up and how they are smashing pots among themselves, eh, but what is significant in this story. remember, if these dances, theresa may remember, yes, how she is boxes danced not very pretty. it feels like they have a competition of freaks there, and they are for the post of prime minister. they choose. oh , can we show a video in america as a senator fighting for i don’t know what is happening in the western world. i really don't understand. we will now show how at a meeting with voters one of one of the american. the senator is trying to get attention. let's show. she's an incumbent senator

friends, here is this meeting with voters. this is the current senator and some in america there like it yes. i will literally say a replica. uh, when the citizens of the russian federation voted for the amendments to the constitution of the russian federation, they just protected themselves from this propaganda of these values, both european and american, because, as it were, when you look at it all, for now. yes. eh, well, already cease to be even more surprised. just to the fact that we were on time on the constitutional law, that is, the constitutions protected us from these values, the so-called ones that were imposed on us. listen, maybe we are something we don’t understand, but the truth is, here i am now, as if i know the answer to this question. but i, as the presenter

, must go the other way, at least indicate, but please excuse me, the audience, maybe we really don’t understand something. maybe this is the future. here is a dancing senator. it 's real. that future, where is the bright picture of the western world trying to lead us, perhaps, really. uh, when the prime minister appoints his friend as a minister, who climbs, uh, unzips some guy in parliament trying to get his hand in there. this is what they deserve. or maybe we, too, maybe, this is the future, alexei believes, because the guys are now there in the donbass. i have already stopped playing. that 's double standards, although showing the other side. they are fighting against the fact that it was a colleague who correctly indicated that britain has a super-task - this is not about ukraine at all, these are two different civilizations. we are not a civilized world for them. well, the savages who are not at all sorry for and the differences for them are actually ukrainians from us, but let’s not say that, it doesn’t matter what city it doesn’t even matter what the

name of this nation is and how sanyok’s genie might be, they didn’t move to anyone through jensno, but the essence is completely different. here they have an understanding of civilization. there is an understanding of who is dancing. uh, the return of the woman is civilization. you are understanding them. now it is. and then we are who for them nurki mongols, there is a broadcast of something like that more, because not only the military and curators. it is in ukraine from britain that all media curators exactly. there, exactly from the same place, and it's all a single chain of events. by the way, i probably heard yesterday in ukraine there was a new one that they are going to legalize the porn industry there, and, uh, because a huge number of women who work in webcam models are from ukraine and now they need to officially somehow earn and pay taxes there too they are seriously discussing the legalization of this industry, plus they are discussing the active legalization of seafarers. no kidding, absolutely many people are waiting for this and that's it. this is happening against the backdrop of you and i are important against the backdrop of the liberation of donbass and

against the backdrop of the liberation of ukraine i don’t know what kind of people you need to be to discuss this against the background of when people are being killed in your country, but uh, foreign mercenaries who look at all these pictures. they understand that i don’t know, they are probably going to fight. that's for this world that we show and that's uh in the lc. yesterday andrei marochka. this was confirmed to us by the fact that a huge number of foreign mercenaries were destroyed in these boilers, even specific numbers were called. and here is the data quote already and our conversations with andrey quotes and dale they tell already. more detailed stories died there. uh, a brazilian mercenary one of them is a model, a model, who went to fight as a sniper with her boyfriend and let's hear what you said there. the brazilian model turned sniper came to fight in ukraine 3 weeks ago, but the 39-year-old talita duvalier died in a missile attack on kharkov talita was responsible for covering the russian offensive in

youth. she was a model and actress but later developed a taste for fighting. in iraq , joining forces fighting against isis. there she was trained in sniper business, my sister has always been a peace-loving real and progressive weapon - this is part of the context of the war, but she saved the lives of a forty-year-old brazilian who fought in ukraine along with the capital. he also died in kharkov, that's what drives these people, that they leave their quite a comfortable life. most of these people who uh go to war if we're talking about as mercenaries they have a far from comfortable life these are people one way or another, this is the first one these are people who are , uh, losers let's call them honestly. these are people dismissed from the army for various reasons, this particular model is a woman. she is doing well in life. she made money from it. then she became no longer a model. eh, she's gone. here is what she earned. yes, she decided to rebuild, what is it

like to evaluate it? a man goes looking for something. something that he cannot find in civilian life, because he asks. he loses his own support, and therefore among them, it turns out, are the losers of the writers and the losers of the actors and the losers of the model. and let's get the military in direct contact with us right now, let's just ask him the same questions andrey marochkin. the lieutenant colonel of the people's militia of the lpr is in touch with us, but andrei, first of all, is already quoting us from the daily mail and your statement about foreign mercenaries is being followed very closely. let's give them some more stuff. they are sure right now. well, at least those who know russian are watching our program and write down on a pencil everything that we say, and in particular. of course, you will say who have specific information about these foreign mercenaries. here we have, as it were, such a dispute, as if relatively not bright, but it raised a question. whether successful people go to mercenaries who are doing well and who go to defend western values, or losers, maybe you have

some more specific information. i wish you good health ruslan but first of all. i beg to differ with your previous speaker, because not only the so-called losers come here. well, it’s quite an elite unit, which is ready to kill civilians here for a lot of money, it doesn’t matter to them who they kill. the main thing is that they pay for this money; moreover, it has been very developed over the course of eight years. the so-called safari brought people here for money, so that they would shoot at living people, and mercenaries who, uh, let's say, also came. well, we already call them soldiers of fortune. well in our case, they are already trouble soldiers. so these soldiers of fortune, they make a living by killing people. eh, so that the contingent is completely different, indeed. we fixed

a lot of countries. nato uh, the presence here is exactly uh, let's say citizens and uh, the far eastern countries of the middle east, the countries of the former soviet union, that is, very uh, a different contingent of these citizens and to say that there are only losers well, i think it's a little wrong. eh, now we have at the moment. e in the republic that's just all of these soldiers of fortune. e. well, let's say we we are engaged in a humanitarian mission and we bring all these soldiers of fortune to one place. uh, now we have a very big problem in the street over 30°, uh, losses. we have already spoken to you. i won’t voice them, moreover, today the general staff has also given new information. the losses are colossal, no one ’s body is taken away at all. from the battlefield. we have, uh, at the moment there are already such. e group e,

consisting of voluntarily. uh, let's put it this way, uh, agreed ukrainian military prisoners who collect the bodies of their ukrainians. e, brotherhood and e, it's hoarding it with us now, uh, against the backdrop of a catastrophe, because of the sanitary situation. you yourself understand what it is. and these are large cities, where we find them, this is plus fields. well , in general, terrible things, about which, of course, uh, i don’t want to talk. so i think in the near future we will publish some shots. they are just those soldiers of fortune who decided to come to us. let's see what happens to them. uh, after we demilitarize. uh, let's say these servicemen andrey viktorovich what is their fate of these mercenaries? here, uh, a sniper from brazil. she is probably not the only one like that, firstly, from brazil to go to ukraine to fight. for what it is a separate

question, well, for money. you have probably already explained to you, although it would probably be interesting for what money do people sell their lives. in the truest sense of the word, but they are not combatants. well, that is, these are the people who are not subject to, are not considered prisoners of war, and then, according to international law, no one will exchange them. well, because they're outlaws, what fate awaits them for those who were captured, if those who were captured, they will be held accountable under the law, and in the republic in which they were captured, either the donetsk or lugansk people's republic, everyone will be given a legal assessment. moreover, i i want to add you a little , even according to the international law of the geneva convention, these persons are war criminals. and this is a cleansing circumstance in sentencing. so at least. this is about 15 years of imprisonment and the maximum - it is either capital punishment or a life

sentence. so this is their fate. well, uh, i can tell you that few live to see this fate, because for us, this is goal number one and usually. now they are collected in the fields and buried in mass graves. thank you very much andrey vitalievich marochka. with us in direct contact. i think the daily mail has been following our conversation closely and we are now in some detail. e for those who want to fight british mercenaries will give the inhabitants of great britain those time for a new statement from boris johnson following immediately after his resignation address. he's going to talk on the phone, now guess who? right bravo kira album by zelensky the first person to talk to boris johnson after the official appeal about his resignation, it will be the president of ukraine zelensky and another news related to the uk this is reported by the british foreign secretary to the bbc track list, which is currently a on a trip to the g20 meeting in indonesia

urgently interrupts her trip and returns to london alexey then is dear to her. where is the logic why the call to zelensky and the return of the list of tracks, which, roughly speaking, is no better than johnson is fighting. but for you and me. she is the same ardent russophobe and is also ready to support zelensky like boris johnson does this mean that she is the main candidate for the post of prime minister after boris johnson well, i won’t talk about her for sure, but if we are talking about, in principle, banking kiev, and then how they make a decision. uh, obviously, everyone is very afraid. and what the guys will now incur in britain and they will put it on, and, that is, this is a call to support them a little, of course, this is some kind of control. they are not going to let them go at all, and here, when we see it, it's not just us , these strange videos with incomprehensible substances that

are supposedly. hey, someone is using it. they see exactly the same. and what will this person do, well, a state of nervous stress. they are very afraid of this, and they will do it. everything possible so that these threads of control in general no way to leave, so of course it's an urgency , uh, it's driven by that in the first place. although uh. well, let's hope, of course, that something will change, but this is extremely unlikely in terms of the fact that, uh, somehow, kiev banking will behave differently. well, everything, maybe this thing is unpredictable, they are on the same wave of drug addicts there. well, such, yes, such a wave, in the meantime, not very happy news comes from donetsk. a woman died today in donetsk as a result of shelling from the armed forces and the hospital building and the kindergarten was damaged during the shelling of the kuibyshev region, unfortunately this is also happening today and we have a direct connection with the special correspondent of the union tv channel alexander brain from donetsk alexander hello ruslan ruslan hello. yes

, bad news. in general, the last days have become especially tense and tragic. uh, here, as you have already noted in the petrovsky district , people died today. on the eve of e six, of which three children died in makiivka , a seventeen-year-old teenager graduate was hit by shelling and did not get out local lyceum. also, uh, two children died, an eight-year-old boy, a seven-year-old girl. the children at that moment were walking in front of the house on the playground. right now, at this moment, the people of makiyavka are there, demolishing flowers and children's toys, in addition, at this very time. e, continues to be under fire and petrovsky already mentioned by us the area. donetsk is. as you have noted? uh, official data posts about that and by the way, i'll clarify. this is exactly in the petrovsky district. yes, there was a hit on the territory of the local kindergarten rodnichok krom in addition, recorded hitting the school. the enemy

in the petrovsky district, i note, began to hit from 6:00 in the morning and use heavy artillery of 122-152 caliber. uh, three wounded civilians of the kirov region also remain in the hospital. it was literally literally hot there the day before, i became a hot witness to that. e. it so happened that he was invited to a family celebration. uh, but in the end almost got under fire and that's how it was. yes, there is a video, let's see. we will see. so technically, unfortunately we can not show alexander, but i think that your next inclusion will definitely be shown and told. take care of yourself. if you have a video sequence, i just had a hit, in addition to residential development, and also the clubs were on fire for a very long time in the local oil depot. i am smoke. and only in the morning it was possible to localize.

this is a fire, they say alexander managed to show everything without sound, our viewers saw it. thank you very much. take care of yourself and all of your heart with you with donbass and with all russians. thank you very much alexander brain was with us on a straight line connections, meanwhile, ukrainians continue to live ukrainian politicians continue to live in some kind of absolutely parallel reality, everyone remembers the story of the snake island, when at first they announced that they had hoisted the flag, then it turned out that after all this should be treated metaphorically, it seems like they were thrown from a helicopter, and this information caused a storm of irritation in ukrainian social networks, because at first they believed that ura ura ura we are again on a snake and a special operation was adopted, which was supposed to hoist a flag on the island serpentine is already real this morning it happened and already there were publications that it happened they hoisted the flag. and, if possible, new photographs, we will show already, are really modern today. uh, from serpentine island, where it is clear that this is happening at the current moment, yes, that is, it can be seen from the situation, they really landed, they really hoisted the flag. well

, this inscription was photographed even before they shipped the flag. well, just in case, so as not to waste time. what happened then he told, uh, to our ministry of defense lieutenant general, kanash, let's listen. against the backdrop of military failures and a massive retreat of ukrainian troops in the donbass on the night of the 7th and the velikiy regime, an attempt was made to symbolically deliver the flag. on the island of snakes around 5:00 am. several ukrainian servicemen landed on the island from a motor boat and took pictures with the flag by plane. the russian aerospace forces was immediately hit by high-precision missiles on the island, serpentine. as a result of which part of the ukrainian servicemen was destroyed, the survivors fled in the direction of the settlement of primorsk, odessa region. she ’s back again. i would like to return to the shelling of donetsk, in fact , people are dying, and the worst thing is

children are dying. but against this background, i would like to draw attention to zelensky’s cynical statement as the leader of the terrorist state of ukraine i have no other assessment. you know, now getting ready trying to cook. uh, public opinion, the world in order to refer to what that allegedly, uh, were bombed, uh, the weapons depots of the russian army, which were stored on the board, but this is complete nonsense. eh, i have no other words, but nevertheless. they are already trying to do it, they are trying and will do it, but we will not answer anything. this information channel on pervy vremya will be shown by anatoly kuzichev olesya loseva the day is not to be said to be very kind ukrainian punishers continue to iron donetsk in the morning shelling of donbass resumed yesterday in makiivka on the playground. three children died. one passed away immediately on the spot, the girl died in the hospital. a little later in intensive care. died, third child.

the avdeyskoye direction must be said to be one of the most difficult battles. they have been going there for a long time and it is from there that they are hitting the danitsa region. our colleague, the host of channel one, yulia baranovskaya, visited the positions of the dpr army in the avdeevka direction and filmed a unique material about how life works on the front line. let's see. hello , please tell us where we are. now we are in the village of spartak suburb donetsk is very close to the positions of the ukrainian troops. what function does your unit perform here exclusively for the defensive defense of donetsk yes in order for them to pass the ukrainian authorities here? directly where i do not know the secret. open native commands are located here. here

our fighters do not live. duty, huh? our soldier's dining room, and what was for lunch, by the way? kitchen, we have a gas cylinder, we fill it. here we have a farm doctor doctor hello why i see yes here

i can't make shards. uh, father of five, you have five children , all boys. and how old is 28 to 8? and where are they all here in donetsk, one son is now serving the rest of the house is a little small.

i don't even want to look. yes, if one person, it flew there. there is one person walking, then he has to aim to eat. here is such a crowd going 2-3 shots to make surely someone will hit. yes, literally two steps. and then a person will fall, because they arrive and may not burst everywhere. yes, where the meter is mined

there is one point there in general they are less than 300 meters. caught 8 years old, they are far from here, they are not far. here is here with the point where we are now, well, less than a kilometer. they have guys for the position of the sychevy, but what is it? someone is praying, someone is sitting about something thinking. hello julia very nice. can you tell us how it can be arranged here? how do you live? beware

of kittens and what's your name? carrot? what is the main task of your unit to prevent a breakthrough? no that is, conditionally, if if you weren't standing here, they would have come in donetsk a long time ago. what kind of equipment do they have. well, i don’t know what kind of equipment they have on one road, one single road is paved, because

everything else is mined. what's this? yes, this is a road that cannot be passed, that is, we are all directed to this road. here it burns. this is their military unit, that is, they are here nearby, before landing, all this is all, so it's very close.

yes and you can tell me the place where we are now, the position of ours is the beginning of the position. yes a here it begins and further here already there. and what is it for the destruction of the opponent?

she, too, is silent, as soon as they start to go for a breakthrough, and she starts to work. and where did they shoot there? yes, they will shoot the answer now, right? tell me, what is it that comes in there to

turn, and there hasn’t been anyone here for a long time. here the spiders poured a web. clear. that is, if it collapses, is there a special pipe through which air will flow? reflection of the attack

what is your task here? what exactly are you here are you doing? we protect against a breakthrough in the event of a breakthrough from avdiivka, you report immediately. yes, and the guys have some backlash. oh well, if you're about how many, they have time. 3 minutes somewhere. well, that is, when you see that there is a breakthrough, 3 minutes, you say yes, yes, we report and try to delay it. yes, some measures, and you have a walkie-talkie . and how much after lasts 3 hours after three hours we change, we have to change. and when you go out here for 3 hours, you take something with you, except for. well, it’s clear, i’m going, some something here

is there or not? or they don’t eat here, of course, you need to watch all the time or you somehow well, i don’t know all the time, that is, you heard how the landmarks are shooting, that is, we report from where to where? and you can tell by the sound, of course. towards the city towards the city. that is, now they are shelling directly, donetsk. and we do n’t know, for sure, they flew somewhere where people could be now usually and peaceful people. but it's that it's ours. that's our heard. where did you fly from? yes, and they began to lay hailstones, right? and very, very important well done yulia baranovskaya ah

in the continuation in the continuation i want to show you. we want to show you the plot of another brave girl of our colleague, our friend the author of the project is one of the authors of the project. we are alive, maryana naumova she tells us about two fighters. whose strength of mind. well, it's just amazing. let's see. i often visit hospitals, meet with wounded soldiers, real heroes. each of them has military exploits behind his back, but heroism remains with him here in hospital beds. i come here desire to help them, but the surprising thing is much. they help me more. understand how

important strength of mind is for a person. the story of vasily artyom was told to me by my acquaintances, vasily, the combat commander. artyom ordinary fighter, both since 2017 have been defending their land from all sides, they have gone through many heavy battles. on march 15, that is, we were advancing on the gay woman, there was an order, that is, to take positions, but in order to be able to move further, well, we have already reached their positions. uh, some even of our guys. uh, already entered the position, but at this time he a strong strong shelling began, my eightieth mine flew. guilt hit yes, clearly in the legs, that is, as it were, at all, well, it didn’t leave me any chances, well, it lifted me upside down in the air, and i fell right into this funnel, that is, i fell, i honestly don’t understand myself. well, here's how i stayed, a vein, probably with god's help. i remember that only

the flash was a stunning explosion. fell already. well, it seems like i already lost consciousness at this time. i came to my senses already felt this pain. that's what, well can't move my feet just a little turned around again i saw what he was holding there. well, the wounded is the same as me, uh, right here one on one. e. well, he is also with us, then our guys, they arrived , as if they took us away, so they took us already. here's if it's got surgery. i know that just about a little more and, as it were, well, they will be squeezed out anyway. there, well, here, they all answer civilians. they know that there are no military installations here. it's just a pity for these people, well, who well, they

are not guilty of anything at all, they are peaceful people who just go to the market, go to the shops. e. well, that's how they meet her. so you can not children children die. that's it, in general, how can you fight with them, if they do it like this, they just need to finish it, everything has already begun, it needs to be finished. i

open your heart.