to the stall for toffees give money. this is not a computer. and risk is your favorite toy. we transfer artyom's dogs to therapy. please tell me what is silent, this is normal.

here is grandfather. grandpa, that grandfather died just sleeping, grandfather will get better. grandpa crushed his dog today. formally, the grandfather is to blame for the accident, so as not to knock down the dog, he taxied towards, and the jeep tried to avoid a head-on collision, failed and drove in. this is a bias towards patients. i

understand your maximalism, but you did not have here last autumn, when the son of a deputy knocked people down on stop four corpses, and the guy got probation. listen, well, you slipped me a client who fought for 6 hours and gave kazantsev, there was a spinal shock, katyusha . do you think the heroic surgeon deserved a cup of coffee? our new diagnostician kirill belov , tell me, this is not with you. we were late at the parking lot today. sorry. yes, then bravo, not every doctor will notice this kind of luck for beginners. thanks

artyom have you been discharged? yes, you are grandfathers grandfathers, i'm afraid, now it will not work. come tomorrow. artyom artyom can you hear me, you can't go there? well done. but you can't go to the hospital with dogs. so go downstairs to the reception, tell everything there to the administrator about this dog, he'll come up with something there

. yanochka will be fine with her. dad will write an ad, we will definitely find her. butterscotch smuggling and what will happen if the head nurse catches you, what will the kick-ass be paw patrol? this is what i asked for. this is our way.

i will not say anything about your non-standard methods.

fat that jump is completely unmotivated something is not right here. ask the new nurse dobry

evening on the air big game today, president vladimir putin signed a decree on a simplified procedure for obtaining russian citizenship for all citizens of ukraine and had two important telephone conversations with president of belarus alexander lukashenko and president of turkey recep tayyip erdogan, and both conversations concerned, including ukrainian topics. moreover, following a conversation with erdogan , it was announced that in the near future. the russian turkish summit is likely to be held in turkey, the united states over time, they continue to build up armaments for ukraine. the other day, president biden alone signed a decree allocating her a new tranche of $400 million in defense assistance, which, among other things, includes four more missiles. haims systems, this is in addition to those eight that were transferred earlier and a thousand shells to increase, increased accuracy up to for 155 mm

guns. moreover, it is not excluded that we are talking about guided rocket and rocket projectiles, projectiles. excalibur with a range of up to 60 km, while the pentagon make a statement about their readiness to supply ukraine with weapons quote, the coming months and years. and that with their help, the kiev authorities will allegedly be able to hold out in this conflict longer than russia, that is, the united states is still waging a war of attrition to the last ukrainian, moreover, according to the finantion times, citing an unnamed pentagon representative, new mlrs. himes, allegedly they will shoot further than previously transferred samples and western media do not exclude the transfer of missiles to ukraine long range. they can shoot at a distance of up to 300 km, and that's it. this coincides, firstly, with today's statement by an adviser to the united states government commission on security and

cooperation in europe - this commission is also called the us helsinki commission and it consists of members of congress. so the adviser's name is paul masar, and he said that ukraine should be allowed to strike at the territory of the russian federation, in belarus and in the crimea. and secondly, this all coincides with increasingly loud rhetoric and in ukraine itself, but, allegedly, their upcoming offensive with the aim of capturing the south, with rhetoric that clearly sounds with the filing and approval of the united states in this regard. i want to ask alexander mikhailovich what you think. all this is similar to the american position, similar american actions and rhetoric, and new arms deliveries . perhaps more long-range this desire. here's how to once again probe and maybe move the russian red lines in terms of at what stage, uh, it will already be necessary to stop. and at what stage can the conflict

escalate into an unacceptable escalation to the level of russia, nato, or is it just loud statements, empty rhetoric against the backdrop of the defeats that ukraine is suffering in the donbass well, probably only the americans themselves know the answer. i would like to say that when a strong person begins to threaten. it speaks of his weakness. so i think that here, uh, this element is present on the other hand, it is impossible to underestimate the opponent, moreover, we understand perfectly well that the americans are not alone, and this entire western world. he, of course, they study study our missile defense. this is generally our entire system, but still i am inclined to add a little optimism due to the fact that, if you look, then how the americans and europeans considered it possible. as they thought to kneel on the economic topic, it means that they failed, this does not mean that they did something wrong. they simply did not quite

adequately assess their capabilities and subsequent reaction, and i do not exclude that today's one is to saturate ukraine with weapons. it's already e not that repetition. yes, this is a kind of analogue of the military sphere of what they did in the economic sphere. i really count on the fact that the missiles and shells that are battling, uh, ukraine, uh, suddenly do not accidentally fly away towards america, that is, you know, no one there knows the technical capabilities, so we'll see, but seriously speaking, then, of course , trying to solve by proxy, the problems that they believe exist between us. this is a thankless job and sooner or later they will have to choose or stop. recognizing the inevitable either get drawn into a direct conflict, and i already spoke on your transfer. they are physically afraid of it physically. this was demonstrated by yugoslavia. and even more so here, so here you just need to respond adequately. be prepared for anything and

calmly do your job. well, really. we very often talk about the lack of professionalism, uh, and irresponsibility of the western elites. but in this part , president biden, who is a kind of product of the cold war, who remembers the cold war, which he met in his time from the coffin and with other leaders of the soviet union. for him, the prevention of a third world is really one of the most important principles, so it seems to me that we are talking about probing the red lines here, but the united states is hardly ready to cross this red line if russia clearly outlines it . and secondly, i completely agree with you that this policy can and does hit the united states itself. and by the way, there is a lot of activity going on inside the united states. in the know, not only to experts, but also to political level about how optimal uh, the current policy that i described at the very beginning and how long it can continue. and here is a very interesting one. it seems to me that a remarkable article was just recently published by the new york

times, which is very close to the biden administration and the democratic establishment, the co-authors of this article is the famous david senger. one of the main colonists. e, new york, times and a person very close to the democratic party and he writes that this policy is not endless. i mean, she's completely clear. here it is, of course, exactly, and more than that, and every day every week it becomes more and more difficult to continue this policy, and in the end, there is a discussion in the united states that at some stage this policy will be necessary to change not not in the short term, but a little further here is the ambassador do you have an excerpt from this article by david senger? president biden has pledged to support ukraine for as long as it takes, but neither he nor anyone else can say for how long. it will last. how long will the united states and its allies be able to control the course of hostilities from a distance,

avoiding a direct military clash with russia officials say sooner or later the stockpiles of weapons in the us and europe will run out the united states has already allocated $ 54 billion for military support to ukraine but no one is waiting another check for the same amount, the biden administration does not want to push zelensky into negotiations with the kremlin, so as not to play in favor of russia officials and analysts. they say to keep the current the level of material support will be difficult as war weariness grows on both sides of the atlantic by some estimates, the military assistance approved by congress will last until the second quarter of next year, the question is whether the current arms and ammunition transfers will affect the military potential of the united states itself. , pay attention, david sengar directly raises the issue that by substituting weapons to ukraine, the united states weakens itself and this is already felt inside the united states, but i personally have andrei here here is the article. ah, she called. there is such a feeling of some kind of

dead end and hopelessness in the united states , because they write that the current policy is more and more difficult to implement the current policy every day more and more difficult for the united states , but the devicenter does not write about abandoning this policy , yes, that is, on the one hand, the difficulty is recognized, but on the other hand, it is said and or hinted at that for the time being, move away from this policy. it doesn't work for you what impression, but it's you absolutely right in such an assessment. the fact is that this is it. you can't go on like this, but you ca n't refuse it either. this is the situation with the american administration, because to refuse, they paid 54 billion in cash. in general, trump today spoke already more than 60 billion, the americans have spent and they are being drawn in more and more, there are no

positive results, but on the other hand , they themselves and their own they put a reputation that if ukraine loses in ukraine, it is the west that loses because it’s like fighting in russia with the west. i think there is one such possibility here. we must help america in such situations. when the americans really withdraw, if we have a serious qualitative change on the battlefield - this will give the americans and the american administration. perhaps. but you see, we have done everything for you. you couldn't, so it's pointless, but we won't. we are humanists. we will not be until the last ukrainian. it's all lies. we do not want to the last ukrainian, but always americans, if a well-known expression, uh, i remember when uh hmm somewhere in africa when american uh

soldiers killed there in the seventies or eighties . i forgot now, but i liked very much, uh, interpretation. they died there. many americans, after some time, said the mission was over. it seems to me that it was in salt that exactly exactly uh, failed absolutely announced that the mission was over, we won, and therefore we are returning. that's how it happened recently in afghanistan, that is, again. the main thing is to report and say that, in fact, that's what we they wanted to do it. what did we want, what did we do? this is, uh, the tenth question. and here too. i think that if there is no serious push in this direction, but because no matter how they

say, you are still right about the fact that not only in the new york times. yes, if before only fox now everyone is talking. and how long can this last? but because, again, the economic situation is inflation. there are a number of other things that create a very unfavorable situation for the administration if the administration i was sure that they had at least some chance by november. and to keep the victory or to achieve great success? and they would, of course, go for it, but if they lose, then of course, the faster they finish, the more they will have the opportunity to play on some other sites. well, uh, i think that david senber cannot openly call for a change in policy, they will stop listening to him, they will stop picking up the phone in the white house and let them in, so to speak, to confidential meetings, but in the expert

community, american experts are scientists and analysts indeed openly calling for the united states. all uh, decisively change the policy, there are more and more such experts, and the last example is a very authoritative american scientist, a professor at the massachusetts institute of technology, baripolzan is a very eminent expert, a is considered to belong to the school of neoclassical realism. here he wrote an article in fore face magazine, this article is now in the top in terms of views, the most readable one. e article, a in which he really says that the current policy is dead-end what about the united states of ukraine well, they cannot defeat russia in ukraine but it is physically impossible to achieve regime change in russia changing russian policy is absolutely out of the realm of fantasy and in this regard it is really necessary to change the policy and move from

arms supplies to peace talks, and at the same time, the article is remarkable not only for the argumentation of why, in bari’s opinion, the current american policy is completely a failure, but also how, in his opinion, a peaceful settlement on ukraine listen to the rhetoric of ukraine's leaders and its patrons it's like victory is just around the corner but this view is becoming more and more like a fantasy ukraine and the west need to be ambitious and move from the strategy of achieving victory in the war to a more realistic scenario of finding a diplomatic compromise that will put an end the fighting prerequisites for such a solution are already visible in each side of the conflict will need to make painful concessions. ukraine will have to formally abandon a significant part of its territories, at the same time russia will have to give up further conquests and any territorial claims, in order to secure itself from a possible re-invasion of russia, ukraine needs the support of the united states and europe as well as their

constant military assistance, consisting mainly of defensive weapons. russia will have to recognize the legitimacy of such agreements. the west will need to lift many of the economic sanctions imposed on russia between nato and russia, resume a series of diplomatic negotiations that limit the intensity of military deployment and interaction along the relevant borders alekseevich, how do you like these recommendations, how realistic they are, how practical they are. pay attention to the lifting of sanctions and the russia-nato talks on limiting arms and taking into account each other's security interests there and compromises, including territorial yes, and so on. how do you think? i believe that all this should have been published in december of last year, even before it began, when russia came up with major initiatives , it proposed a large package of agreements. and then all this had to be taken with the western

countries. well, of course bargain. uh, there 's something to fix somewhere, but uh, but it was a package holistic agreement. maybe there was something in detail that could be said about something, but in general it was already almost lumpy. ready. that had to be accepted. uh, then a complex solution and then write all this, but as a last resort, probably in the first week in the first two weeks of the special military military operation, because now all this can be characterized as a freezing of the conflict, russia needs the resolution of all this abscess, and not freezing all this for years. or maybe it’s 5-10 years ahead, because what is proposed is actually to draw in the rest of ukraine, here’s what will remain in the form of some disabled ukraine and it will be drawn in if it

doesn’t, here in the article yes, some part of ukraine and in fact it did. uh, a bridgehead over nato yes, america and nato, and russia must accept this as i wrote, this is a respected professor or not very respected well and he is from the states very important. this does n't make any sense from my point of view. this is very related to your previous question here, and everyone recognizes the impasse. although propaganda that there is a theory of war for ukraine, not all is lost. something may be, this whole theory. uh, all these propaganda. uh, things are going on, but in general, everyone understands that american politics is quite a dead end and it will definitely have to be changed, and they are buying time until the midterms, because they can't change it before the midterm elections, but everything has gone so

far and fairly in this policy. you said that reputation is at stake, that now it cannot be changed without some kind of sacrifice. someone needs to be appointed, as they say in america, as a scapegoat. here someone is needed for someone. dump the wine, and from my point of view, all these articles are now going on, they are a voice and a bet in e. this is such a veiled discussion of who to appoint extreme many want to appoint zelensky as extreme, but it is difficult to appoint an extreme person who, in many western countries, after the propaganda pumping that he was given, is more popular than their own local politicians. yes, zelensky in america will be more popular than biden biden, so that they themselves cannot appoint zelensky extreme after that er , the miracle of which they created

biden with him. right now, for the past week in america , there have been publications of statements that, on the whole, generally bend in the direction that and let's definitely biden in the extreme. here is him in person. well, all the more is there anything to write off? grandfather old problems in the family a significant problem in the family, maybe stress, maybe, so to speak, some kind of senile things there. in general, maybe even imagine him not as a villain, but like this, uh, well, with him, uh, so to speak, reagan went crazy after his resignation. but there is a biden there, for example, while still on duty there is yes and to this a statement, in order to appoint him extreme, someone offers other options. and now they are on e, at this stage, but to step back from that dead-end line into which they have driven themselves, and they have

raised the stakes so much, without some sacrifice they cannot offer. well, there is a discussion about who, in fact, to sacrifice, yes, to sacrifice, then to the propaganda that they spread, well, i completely agree about the exclusively deadlock situation. which the west drove itself, and we talked about it. uh, as for sacrificing biden , but you understand the situation in the democratic party of the united states so much. uh, catastrophic. uh, what, besides biden? you are nobody and according to opinion polls, the most popular democratic politician today is bernie sanders. he can't beat neutrump. he can not unite the democratic establishment around him . it cannot bring along the centrist democrats. yes, he's just progressive, wing. maybe, uh, maybe get lucky. he is also star, this is now kamala haris, if biden is sacrificed, then this crazy woman will become the president of america. this

is just much more than anti-rating. biden absolutely kamala harisa is probably the most unpopular vice president ever. uh, the united states is just an outright moron. it's only when she starts talking, at all, that the truth is, she really didn't handle any of the important things that biden gave her at the time , like resolving the crisis on the us-mexico border. but what's more interesting, right? that's what you noted ivan alekseevich this is the difference in perception, because really what barry wrote crawled for many representatives of the american establishment is absolutely unacceptable. yes, he writes that territorial concessions, but the resumption of russian-nato negotiations and some and some consideration of each other's security interests. yes, he writes that, in principle, one can forget about the victory of ukraine and completely forget it, but you are absolutely right that the russian perception of

what the crawler writes is also unacceptable, because yes , he inserted into these conditions the provision that e intensive military cooperation will continue development between nato west and ukraine. the thorium of the remaining ukraine, which may remain, and this really reflects, and not just the point of view of the crawler - this just reflects the approach of the western mainstream. yes, that's what they are definitely not ready to give up. this is from the continuation of the supply of weapons and it is said that they will substitute weapons for ukraine indefinitely . yes, after the end of the military conflict , they will still supply weapons. all the same, they will really turn ukraine into anti-russian base. and this puts a very big question mark yes, but from and can we agree on something at all? eh, please. excuse me, one remark, literally the president just recently

met with the leadership. well said the first two things we haven't started yet and we can interpret. whatever you like, but the second he said that the further the more difficult it will be, and, of course, to negotiate with us, it discusses here and we must also understand absolutely exactly, we will continue to talk about politics. west, not only in relation to russia, but and ukraine but also in relation to china and saudi arabia after a little publicity. to the 80th anniversary of the beginning of the battle of stalingrad. stalingrad must be taken as soon as possible. they are preparing to launch an attack along this street, so i believe that at the present time we cannot carry out large-scale offensive operations. if we do not

counterattack, they will ask us the volga how much they are still devils, they will also be able to attack us. need to be taken away. on the weekend on the first, how are things, the father on it for a long time up to 15 million rubles to the accounts of individuals without commissions. open a business account at tinkoff.ru and get individual conditions for your business. super prices for a blender, an electric

grill, a vacuum cleaner and up to 50% discounts on the entire range of scarlett equipment at wildberries, which medicine for nail fungus is the most profitable for the price ? number one, this is lena, and she has just found the apartment of her dreams, completed all the documents necessary for the purchase. and now she became the owner of the apartment in a nine-story building near the park, because the apartment is now being bought on marva.ru. damn, i'm good at

strength. maybe magnet cosmetic cares means love 15% discount on baby diapers. nani magnet, buy cheaper, travel around russia free installments for 10 months, halva, as before, weighs nothing to you. still zero percent delay and no maintenance fee either, halva is weightless, installments, a significant advantage when acute pain makes you climb the wall the staff of a large red package rushes to your aid charged against pain extraordinarily delicious angus parmesan only at

burger king powell richie women's sneakers for 799 rubles. in your art. i strive to recreate the plasticity of human movement, but, unfortunately, dolls are hinges, the weakest point, and i don’t have artyom the newest complex with native collagen of the second type to maintain art now freedom of movement, the strength of native collagen. for joints. this is an advertisement for vtb , there are things that will not disappear anywhere our decades of experience that helped us become stronger and survive all crises. that is why everything will be fine with your money, as well as with the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the opportunity to support loved ones at the most necessary moment. go to vtb and everything will work out in magnit hot discounts for all grilling occasions. tinkoff

for business transfer this 15 million rubles. to individual accounts without commission automatic overnight deposits open an account for business at tinkoff.ru and get individual conditions for your business tinkoff he is the only one. big game on the air in parallel with the policy of hybrid war

against russia the united states continues the confrontation against china, which is officially positioned as the main strategic rival. and the russian-chinese partnership is officially presented as a challenge, and to that in the variant of the international order in which they are interested. uh, the united states late last week. as part of the g20 ministerial meeting in bali , five-hour talks took place, and the minister foreign affairs of china wang and united states secretary of state tony blinkin and ahead of this meeting at the state department. it was said that the purpose of these negotiations is to stabilize, and try to, us-china relations. well , create some kind of safety cushion, build some kind of framework and rules that would prevent the escalation of rivalry. and the level is already a direct clash and a direct confrontation, but these are the statements that tony

blinkin ivan made as a result of these negotiations. eh, make it clear. at least for me by and large, they have not agreed on anything. and none of the basic problems of us-kiev relations have been resolved. first, listen to what us secretary of state e said. we are concerned about china's rapprochement with russia beijing claims to be neutral, but it's quite difficult to remain neutral when there is a clear aggressor and a clear victim. i do not think that china is neutral, it continues to support russia out, and i also expressed the deep concern of the united states about beijing's provocative rhetoric in regarding taiwan, the united states does not plan to oppose or interfere in china's internal affairs, but will continue to promote peace and security in the future. the united states wants our channels of communication with beijing to remain open and, as always, we are committed to protecting and advancing the interests of the american people and

american values . in all our relationships. from beijing well note open channels. and this is a normal cold war. this is what happened between the soviet union and the united states in period of the previous cold war. and at the same time, blinken continues to accuse china of supporting russia in that it takes an absolutely neutral position, and does not move away from russia, and, obviously, on all these issues. uh linkin received a negative response from beijing now listen to the speech of the chinese foreign minister the american side must stop slandering our country's athletic system stop slandering china's domestic and foreign policy the united states must immediately withdraw higher tariffs on chinese products and lift unilateral sanctions against the prc company since the united states has promised not to seek a new cold war and should

abandon the corresponding mentality. also they must respect their sovereignty and territorial integrity. china to stop interfering in the internal affairs of the country and stop playing the taiwan card yury vladimirovich it seems to me that this is a rather harsh statement. and personally, it gives me the impression that in china they no longer believe in the possibility of restoring us-chinese relations, and the model before donald trump, that is, apparently, beijing proceeds from the fact that the us -china confrontation has no alternative in the long term and will only grow. do you think uh, i think the americans hit the great wall of china. and now they are digging the ground with their hooves, butting this wall, and the wall is standing and nothing is being done, and the americans. it seems to me whether they give

slack. either they decided to play a big game with us and somehow try, china still calm down and maybe somehow weaken sino-russian relations. here, look how the chinese press. well, the english-language press, the global times newspaper known to us, which is the mouthpiece of the propaganda department of the central committee, they positively assessed this meeting. they think they are americans. they want to somehow improve the situation so that a meeting of sidimpin and badin takes place and one can imagine that such a meeting will take place before the elections, for example, yes, well, they will be american in bali but if you understand, you can meet in person, there is a full-fledged one. and you can be there in the corridor or in the men's room on your feet, yes,

fields in the fields, but still talking on your feet. it 's just bad negotiations. and just like that, they said hello, and that's uh hmm what the americans are talking about. uh, this is actually a repeat of biden's statement. he did in november 21 and then repeated this march. it's five points five points biden. the us is not looking for some new cold wars. they already found they don't want to change the communist system in china usa do not consider the renewal of these alliances in the asia-pacific region, as directed against china by the us, they support the independence of taiwan and the us is not looking for conflict. everything with china. blinkin obviously repeated this, but the chinese say, and you do not keep your promises, and therefore. comrade

ivan put it on the table. four packages here are the chinese say four packages with their ideas, first, you must correct the wrong policy. secondly, here is a list of our specific concerns obviously. this is how we heard them third, abolish the laws against china, this is for hong kong for taiwan for the signon and the fourth package. this is a list of possible areas of cooperation between america and china, so uh, china is not closing the door completely. he doesn't break , uh, relationships. e is with america and is not going to escalate these relations. and uh, the americans, in my opinion, simply do not have the opportunity to escalate, which can be the next step in the next step against china can only be

pushing the taiwanese to declare independence and war now look here. the promised tariff cuts yes, the sanctions that trump imposed on them can be seen as an economic capitulation of america. can it also be seen as a gesture towards the chinese? yes, all is not lost, you can somehow win back. i think we are at the very beginning of some process. i think that the americans, as always, are trying to break down their slander and this dead end that they have entered in relation to china, to somehow try to use it somehow to get out of it and maybe even with some profit. well, uh, i honestly don't see any prospects for a serious exit. eh why? because you correctly listed the positions that the parties present to each other, i do not see the political will. uh, have the parties fulfill uh, these

demands of each other. yes, the biden administration is talking about the possible elimination of trade tariffs. introduced by the trump administration, but this is not being done out of a good life, it is being done, because in the united states historically maximum inflation and increased prices for imports of chinese products because of the tariffs that trump has introduced, these are additional factors in this inflation. yes, that is, biden is trying to take steps towards. yes, but he does. it's not because he wants a better relationship. yes, it shouldn't be considered. as a gift to us, but on the other. look on the other side. see biden. he speaks about his desire to meet ossetian children. the film is silent, exactly, that is, the americans are some kind of slack, or this is a real slack , or they pretend that they have a slack in chinese meeting with biden, who are almost at the bottom of their

rankings, failing one case after another, while still blaming the united states. china its so many things they are going to change the policy towards taiwan gankong xinjiang uighur autonomous region and do not stop putting pressure on china about russian chinese relations. what exactly did tony linkin say, so yes, you are right, relations do not cross the line of hybrid war, as in the case between the united states and russia, but they, it seems to me, remain sharply confrontational and so far i do not see, but the prerequisites for an escalation. uh, maybe, yes, the united states is interested in this escalation, yes, but the dead end of their position, which in this case also manifests itself prevents them, uh, from going on this escalation and taking those steps towards china that could lead to this escalation , but

hope dies last, this is certainly, but another problematic area of ​​\u200b\u200bamerican foreign policy is saudi arabia on this one. there's a middle east tour going on, uh joe canopy. the first in the history of his presidency. many and of course, the apogee of this tour will be his visit to saudi arabia, many already call this visit historical, others humiliating, and the third historical in its humiliation. and indeed, the united states has done a lot personally, the biden administration has done a lot to worsen relations with saudi arabia. uh, back in the beginning of the biden presidency, in general, the middle east direction was declared a minor place of no importance with from a strategic point of view, but there was a sharp deterioration in saudi arabia's relations that reached their historical bottom, and the united states managed to simultaneously worsen

relations with other key middle eastern allies with turkey and israel and now the biden administration, again, is facing problems with the fact that both russia and china are strengthening their positions in the middle east, they are desperately trying to carry out, and work on the mistakes and a on the eve of this visit, and the visit will begin in wednesday and end on saturday, and biden wrote. more precisely, biden obviously wrote an article in a newspaper post, yes, and where, by the way, e did he write e, or did they write to him, what are the goals and why, uh, biden is going to saudi arabia and what goals does he want to pursue at the same time listen many do not agree with my decision to go to saudi arabia, but my job as president is to keep our country strong and safe. we must counter russian aggression and position ourselves in

the best position to surpass china and work towards greater stability in an important region of the world, to achieve this we must engage with countries that can help us in this saudi arabia is one of them, when i meet with the leaders of saudi arabia on friday , my goal will be to strengthen the strategic partnership in the future, based on mutual interests and responsibilities, as well as respect for fundamental american values. here, pay attention, even being in a situation of weakness, the united states cannot refuse arrogance washington post article written. yes , saudi arabia is not important in itself. but since the united states needs to fight with russia with china but now we have to conduct a dialogue with many countries. and saudi arabia of them yes , uh, this suggests that there are certain patterns of american foreign policy that almost never end or

disappear, including, uh, the arrogance of alexandru vyacheslavovich do you think biden will be able to improve us relations with saudi arabia as a result of this visit, and most importantly, will it be possible to convince saudi arabia to sharply increase oil production, export oil for world fish. well , as the red army soldier sukhov from the white sun of the desert would say, this is hardly a for two things. uh, the first saudi arabia realized how much this interdependence of the united states is a threat and risk for them, because on the one hand, when the americans unleashed a war with flanged oil against saudi arabia, saudi arabia received a budget deficit of $ 200 billion, yes, and the saudis understand what will happen if they start again now, the second. uh, the saudis understand that those dollars, uh, that they received for american oil are in america and there are already serious risks of freezing these dollars and there is, uh, the opportunity for americans and american courts

to start seizing these dollars under the law on the victims of september 11, where they can go to saudi arabia. they judge, they didn’t forget it further, but the saudis and saudi arabia in general, all the countries of the guardians are again plus and all the oil-producing countries are not can physically inflict prey. there simply is not e such capacities are not present. enough investment has not been made to resume production, but in the amount that the world economy needs now, even if europe reopens in appearance, even if the united states again closes to the demand of china, india, and other countries. it 's enough, but the investment, uh, is not enough, and the industry has lost $400 billion in lost investments over the past 5 years. and now now more than a trillion investments are needed almost every year for in order to simply maintain production at the current level, because that's not how it was drilled and that's

it. here it pours like a fountain. yes, you always need it, especially if it's oil. eh, constantly working with these squams, everything is a dead end, and meeting the countries and the most dangerous thing for saudi arabia and the predatory anglo-saxon world understands that cutting off russia here in europe is depriving europe of energy resources. eh from russia uh, these carriers have to be taken somewhere, they are used to taking them for free and they, uh, are already hinting that they can destabilize the middle east not by chance, in the fed's form magazine there was an article about the end of the middle east that all these borders that are laid there are very correct. in general, they should be reconsidered. i think that saudi arabia is convinced that russia is, firstly, a very reliable partner of russia - it is the guarantor of security, including in the middle east and russia, save it. reliable partner excellent united states so let's see. i think they will certainly accept. uh, the delegation find coffee with dates, but no more than that, well,

really. and here's another illustration saudi arabia’s distrust of biden, personally, even in pure economic terms, is the green agenda that biden promoted europe yes, and why should saudi arabia invest in additional production when it was joe biden who told them oil for many months or years, this past is our neighbor we don't need the east at all. we don't need saudi arabia, because we don't need middle eastern oil. and saudi oil. yes, we will now have green energy and that's it, yes, but the middle east is so say, e deeds of long-forgotten days. why yes, and purely political sphere. saudi arabia has plenty of reasons for strategic mistrust of the united states how many times in the union? yes, you put it in a simple way, they threw saudi arabia, at least take it in the case of regime change. bashar, al- assad, into which saudi arabia fit in with the american supply, but the united states did

not provide, so to speak, yes, and as a result, saudi arabia is left, including, with a broken trough, and now the possibility of returning syria is being discussed under the assad regime to the arab league. and saudi arabia, among other things, is discussing this, and the united arab emirates does support it, right? or when there is a signal, uh, which sees the saudi turns out, arabia talks to her when they are needed, here and now, but as soon as they are no longer needed. everything, but the agenda. it changes immediately, they are told, so to speak, you are no longer needed. and in general, let's talk about human rights. mohammed bin salman. e outcast. uh, killer guy and so on. as he said many times. uh, talking talking, biden, we'll continue talking about american politics in a few moments. i won't give them their real name . do you remember rudolf and my friend. he and i

worked together during the war in the center knows that we were friends. you will smile in another place, colonel. i will call you rudolf abel, and then they will understand that you have been arrested if you are a citizen of the ussr information on atomic weapons you are facing the death penalty silence. you can think what you want, but we must save you in prison, you will be killed my beloved nothing will work for them. they won't break you. you tell the authorities that i was terribly frightened. agreed on the fate of the legendary intelligence officer in the film the us government against rudolf abel on

sunday at the first million discounts, prepare coat hangers soon clothing sale on ozon but already today discounts from 35% on the summer collection of the village and many other clothing brands with up to 80% discount and often take off my girlfriends their any skin problems are easy to fix something in life, their disguise is not

an option. akriderm gk of complex action helps fight inflammation, redness, infection and itching on the skin and gives greater confidence in life and in the frame of the complex actions of akriderm gk healthy skin beauty is advertising. vtb has things that will not disappear, our decades of experience that helped us become stronger and survive all crises. that is why everything will be in order with your money, as from the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the ability to support loved ones at the most necessary moment. go to vtb and everything will work out. give old equipment and get a discount on a new smar. from archaic for 15.000 999 rub. eldorado is all for low prices, the doll has hinges, the weakest point, but i don’t have artyom the latest complex of native collagen

of the second type to maintain freedom of movement if the subscriber forgot to pay something else, access is limited by tele2, the rules are different. even with a minus, you have access to what you paid honest rates for, we do not block with a minus. what medicine from nail fungus the most profitable mezol evalar is more profitable up to 60% evalar treatment of fungus, without overpayments 30 years reveal the power of plants for your health, evalar number one magnet cosmetic takes care, it means to love a 15% discount on baby diapers. buy cheaper. surprisingly, while maintaining a free installment plan of 10 months, halva, as before, weighs nothing to you. still zero interest on installments and no maintenance fees either. hulk weightless installment, weighty advantage when acute pain makes you climb

on the wall the staff of a large red package rushes to your aid loaded against pain tourist route built open for you new vehicles full of adventures on russia.travel. god from the ship stage journey is the best way to be together grand sale in sokolov has already begun discounts from 50% on all jewelry and watches of your favorite brand right now on wildberries education connective tissue and scarring this is called fibrosis fibrosis prevents the body from working normally blondidatase smart enzyme promotes

the breakdown of fibrous tissue and restores the function of the organs just against fibrosis. on the air of the big game, we are talking about joe biden's upcoming visit to saudi arabia and one of the stated goals of this visit. this strengthening of saudi-israeli relations, biden, in his article in the washington post, proudly emphasizes that he will become the first ever president of the united states to fly to saudi arabia. jid straight from israel but after all, the only basis of saudi israeli relations. this fight with iran simply doesn’t exist anymore, and andrey, in this regard, i want to ask you, after all, and if biden, but this emphasizes the american-saudi

bond so much. he most likely refuses a joint comprehensive plan of action to resolve the iranian nuclear program. and in principle, in his policy in the region, including with regard to iran and in the car of saudi arabia, he returns to positions largely trumpov’s, because it was trump who built an anti-iranian coalition with the participation of both israel and saudi arabia but the progressive wing of the democratic party is baidun. it will not forgive them, it is generally an unacceptable thing. this is true on the other hand is understood. uh, biden is such a weak leader and his positions are so weak. and even more so, he is losing popularity with his electorate every day, which, of course, instead of making some decisions quickly, then maybe he could still put a five-completion before the fact . well, i made a decision there with iran

agreed and so on. moreover, he himself was the conductor of this obama policy, that is, they created it together. these are democrats. it was supported and so on, but he created a stalemate. what are they writing about today? the iranians have already reached the level of 70%, and getting rich, that is, they are one step away from the level when they can create real nuclear weapons. and the main thing is that the american line is not visible, what do they want to do, uh, with iran and therefore, uh, if they restore or try to restore relations, really, i would not e said only e, to the fact that saudi arabia can improve relations with israel. and if it has an anti-iranian direction. it seems to me that in the region. here is a very important thing. i even wanted to do this at the beginning.