with which additional forces are being transferred, specialists in the forest protection department also delivered explosives in order to lay mineralized strips in hard-to-reach places. where machinery cannot work, all in russia now, about 90,000 hectares are on fire per day. the area of ​​fires decreased by 12%, and the central regions of france, which have been suffering from the sweltering heat of forest fires for the second month, were less affected by tropical rain in paris. in less than an hour, 2/3 of the monthly rainfall fell, flooded the underground passages and the metro at the station gushed streams of water, one of the lines was completely closed due to fallen trees. the movement of commuter trains was also disrupted. storm wind. damaged roof gusts. reached 30 m / s, the streets were instantly flooded by pedestrians, moving ankle-deep in water, trying to quickly hide from unexpected weather in cafes or not yet flooded stations. at the main base of the baltic fleet in the kaliningrad region, they met the latest anti-sabotage

boat. vladimir nosov, the ceremony was attended by the widow and daughter of the hero of russia in whose honor it is named this ship of the guard captain vladimir nosov, during a special operation to protect the donbass, sacrificed his life so that the russian marines could get out of the encirclement of the enemy and now the ship with his name in the baltic sea will protect our country from saboteurs. vladimir putin congratulated russian schoolchildren on their triumph at the international olympiad in informatics. past competitions in indonesia were attended by teams from almost 90 countries, all four members of our team alexander babin danil klich vsevolod nagibina and fedor romashov took three gold and one silver medals, the task was carried out remotely on the basis of the moscow festival in a wellness telegram published on the president's website. the head of state noted the bright performance of the russian team proves that domestic education is rightfully respected in the world, and knowledge and determination. according to the president, they will help

medalists move forward confidently and achieve success in their future profession. we continue to discuss, in fact, one of the most important topics, since our confrontation with west. and we all understand perfectly well that what is happening now in ukraine is happening formally in ukraine in reality. this is within the framework of our confrontation with the west and not only in europe well, in a global sense, both we and the west are much broader things here? than well, just countries , so we are discussing, and our answers are for those who pull, or rather, who raised this ukrainian chrysalis. now she's twitching. hitting us. we seem to understand that strikes should be struck back

at those who pull the strings, and now started talking about it. and no, i'm not talking about the answer. yes? i'm talking about what we have. er, or what, we already have or what? we can still have these manipulators feel more i already uh cited e zagardin, where they are already discussing that oh, and putin can turn off the tap. and maybe we will become e, so it's hard or not easy in general it's already getting, because when we made up this program with the editorial group, and the price of gas on the stock exchange was 2.500. for yes, and now, when i saw it in the advertisement, it is already 2.600 and more gazprom well, this is not harshness, not cruelty. it's just like that. here's how, e gazprom says that the guys, well, in principle, by the winter, wait for four, as if welcome. here is the world that you have created with your own hands. and these are not just words, since we have already crossed out this line

, which seems to be like britain in itself, but here’s what it says to you that dail writes there, in my opinion, it says that the british of this company do not only the american pro professor. well, british companies have already feel for yourself, please. nearly 2/3 of uk firms 71% hit by anti-russian sanctions first sting operations in ukraine financial sector hit hardest of all 92% of businesses hit by sanctions because their assets were located in russia about 84% of aviation companies reported losses. since they were related to rented planes stuck in russia. that is, the guys are starting to grunt, so that they grunt, we need them to be silent on depth of two meters. these are qualitatively different tasks. so we think all the time we cannot get rid of a deviant look back. that's what

there's someone out there and we need to answer them. we need to do something for them so that they hear us, so that they understand, well, these are all approaches that were fired 11 years ago, when they started nailing us, males for 11 years are not perceived. you see, if you sit and wait, according to a well-known chinese proverb, when the corpse of your enemy floats past you, then in the modern world you yourself float down this river. the first, as it was, by the way, with the soviet union, so we need to choose the wrong group. even more than a few eighties, there were a few times and before that. but we are there, from my point of view, unfortunately, not the soviet union, but we can correct these mistakes. and we can do what is available to us, firstly, by all means force the global economic crisis. it will develop without us, but without us they can have time to

adapt to it. yes, without us there will be something hmm how to force a global economic crisis, what i said is what i say alone trace, yes, to strike the maximum blow, that is, the raw material without which they cannot live. yes, they say, oh, but where do we put ours? oil, dear friends, so excuse me, develop oil refining, and do not destroy it, as we have been doing since the eighteenth year of the tax maneuver. develop, the manufacturing industry to produce value-added themselves, not e. run around the world. guys, someone will profit at our expense, you know, we have a little more money. let us give you some glass beads. or even we will give for equipment, it is necessary to develop our country. this is a fundamental setting, because we can win now, but if we win without offering the world and ourselves a fundamentally new, but in fact very logical and simple way, the development of progress , complex modernization by humanisms, by the

way, because where there is industry, there and morality there in humanism, then this victory will be temporary, the first soviet union won it won, in fact, several times in a row, but when he did not press, he lost, because his opponents took the best from his model, and we lost. west in terms of living standards in the first place, although in the thirties in the forties and fifties , we were even 50. we now have to press with one hand. what is called a reptile, or rather nasty, and with the other hand to show everyone that the city on the hill - this was america in the 18th century today the city on the hill - we understand, yes, on the seven hills on the seven hills. yes, it's not on any hill. we are on semikhanov right there are more of us. so, look unconditionally with what mikhail said about the development of the manufacturing industry. any report a person will agree with regards to press nasty. and let's not crush them realistically. we did not ask you now

about the economy. i'm talking about the economy, and in principle, we ca n't destroy our enemy, we can't destroy the us european union western capital western garden, we don't need it. it's not our task to drive them 2 meters underground. we will drive the ukrainian nazis out. and we cannot and do not need these. our the task is to live with them, in my opinion, well, how to live with them so that they do not touch us, so that they are afraid of being cut down, so that they believe that they are touching us . and accordingly, clearly. name any word here any definition, so that they do not touch us, this is the very development of the rules of the game, which we are talking about, that after the end of our victorious special operation, these rules will be the rule with the new russia that has demonstrated. how can she work against her opponents. and in the end we hope this is at the optimum. we will have a certain formula for coexistence, both with our western partners and with the older post-soviet space, where not everyone is. our neighbors

behave for this is not enough. here, listen to victory and demonstrative rigidity. look here, my friend. i make a reservation right away. here's a tough one. yes, he says, listen that we are with all tsarskoe why are you talking about these partners here. tell me to shy away with a tactical nuclear strike somewhere there look for western ukraine. keep up the bullshit, next warsaw and see what they've done. well, i begin to explain. you see, andriukha, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. this is also a manifestation of rigidity, the control of the rigidity of the stiffeners, maybe a million times a million, only nuclear, when we say, when, that's why, when we talk about the economy from the point of view of the economy. well, they are already cracking there from winter, from the thought of winter. bloomberg is already writing that, like, there , this could be the most terrible weapon. let's glum-bloomer, let's listen to formulate more precisely. germany is sure to feel the harsh russian winter the most. however, schulz's chancellor brushes aside media fears of

winter hardships, european authorities dodge any discussion on the subject for months. first, they really wanted to save the summer tourist season. secondly, the authorities did not want to provoke a panic among consumers, ordinary european citizens are not fully aware of the anomalies of the coming winter, the fact that subdued lights and air conditioning restrictions have sparked a heated debate not to bode well. nothing good will come december. all this fuss will seem like nonsense if russia decides to continue to use energy resources as a tool of pressure, it is now clear that putin wants to make a sharp attack on the eu and its sanctions. this will be very effective given the disagreements of mistrust and disinformation that exists today in europe , german industry said that without cheap russian gas they will be bent, which will influence whose place on the income of citizens and so on? this is what i'm asking about, because it will already happen automatically, that it will

bend, that is, in this sense, well, again, i risk being accused of suggesting not to do anything as before, but i'm not suggesting that . i say that the whole point is that we have not already done this. they did it themselves. they themselves inflicted this blow on themselves, they left themselves without this gas. themselves will further the question arises. here we are arguing about different tactics there, or rather strategies. need to help them bend, or they themselves have done everything to bend justice for the sake of it. we helped a little gazprom took a principled position. we comply with the contract, and it does not help you. and we helped. we didn't sit here and watch, we prayed upstairs. well, that's enough. no, it is necessary to continue until winter for a long time, several months. know a few months. we will find other answers. i understood, yes, you understand the conflict, a very important point is that the system of international relations. she doesn't work anymore her. as such no let's. honestly, we talked for a very long time about the existence of the so -called delusional infood. yes, he died nonsense, then wood talked for a very long time about the

existence of the jamaican system, and then talking about the existence of the washington consensus. that is, we always want to stay in some system. how do we how do we do it? how sad it will be for us without the washington consensus. and what is the washington concept agreement? this is when not gold has value and oil in ours, having values ​​not gas, but just an agreement that we have bases. we are cool, just admit that we once shied away in japan and then we can repeat the two sixth and ninth rights are forbidden to develop, and we are absolutely right by a thousand percent. but you should always be our colony. here is your growth limit. god forbid you grow up like this, and yesterday the key reports, for example, at the hmm section of our duck, were usually one and very key cool industrial safety in europe in america in russia and russia is becoming that country on which the global system of industrial safety depends.

what is a good civil society is the competition of political elites and where is civil society, and here in these simple hard workers in

germany one person asks a simple question. and why did i get a bill today for 380 euros for my three-room apartment of 68 m, not a damn lot, a lot. they all wear each other showing these bills. yeah. you know what they say in november. what will be the bill? yeah, maybe the government will give me some money. no, it won't. but look, we have not yet come to the conclusion that we are reorienting ourselves to our other partners. so from the point of view of industrial safety. you are absolutely right. we must protect ourselves too. yes , chips now we see that this is blackmail that exists all over the world in the first place hong kong produces in the second taiwan in the third japan in the fourth singapore once upon a time everything was different the states were and china there were two monsters . well, let us now talk carefully with our corporations, which raise our factories. they say we know we are doing now. these factories and we may well sooner or later switch to their standard of these chips, which will allow us to protect us first of all and

we are moving to our industrial security, not all our lives hope. and let the germans make the best car. let the chinese have the best thing to do. we have come to the understanding that we are on our own. this is our normal national egoism starting to work. i think that from our point of view, selfishness is a very cool story when we play for ourselves and for ourselves for our team. we don't score points for china. yes, they buy us with discount oil. many people laugh about it. but it's our money, our profit. we still get much more than before the crisis. and we sell fewer resources. we have more left. if we reduce the flow of oil just a little bit by half a degree, then see what the temperature will be. now being discussed. you know how. for example, what temperature should be now working is being discussed in the european union everywhere since november 18 °. i wanted to say 19 is already 18 is already a degree inverse proportion. the higher it grows, it's very funny, but i don't have the feeling that only by 15 legislatively, they will come or not. and the children will show, time

will tell, yes, well, this should complicate your heart, and this is we have not started yet, how to say? it is they themselves who will drive the restoration of the soviet union here. uh. you see, michael must know. in what percentage of world chains are russia critically involved 8%. yes. i remember that the percentage, that is, the exclusion of russia, is the collapse of the world economy completely, because that these 30-40 percent should be excluded from these chains. look, he'll lag himself out. i propose to play on this support that we need and who work for the forces ready to ally with us and, uh, press those that we do not need. yeah, generally speaking, it was always clear. although here we condemned ourselves for the oil needle the so-called that the one who produces raw oil and energy is

more important than the one who makes machines and computers. and so, until they come up with a new source. e energy resources to do who produces energy. yes? well, yes, that is, in any case, uh, this one concerns, therefore, in this situation, so far, what they have come up with brings more problems. what solves the issues we really turned out to be stronger than them, not fully realizing that we are stronger, in my opinion, we ourselves were very surprised to admit this to ourselves. well, yes, sometimes it seems to me that somehow we are so very careful. it. uh, at first there was a certain shock. yes, how is it that they forbid us everything in february, then we joyfully began to see that they had more problems than we did. then it turned out that we charge them in rubles. tom turned out that they have as you put it, everything is cracking. here the question is a clear calculation, here are the boundaries of the

impact that work for the positive, but there is another side to the issue. very many in the world do not like them, but put up with them because they are strong. and very many are either dependent or afraid to be more afraid, because i would like to throw off the dependence , but you understand, a restrained attitude towards our confrontation with him was largely caused. remember how it could be a few years ago then the greeks came to us to ask for money, then the italians and the south of europe, that they coveted ukraine in europe to compensate for the losses in the south of europe, which became bankrupt. and we, and in these conditions lose. understanding that we are strong in our inflexibility, that when our potential allies do not know, we will go to the end or we will now come to an agreement with the americans. what should they do then? and they ran across to us, and we agreed.

it seems to hang over us. i think about what. you say that i would do it differently formulated. it seems to me that they do not know, do we ourselves know to the end? will we go all the way or, uh, want to make a deal? where are you? where can i find you? show me the way out of all creation. i don't need helpers for

andrei konchalovsky's 85th birthday that's beauty for depraved tyrants and murderers on perviy the information channel on perviy continues its work, we are actually discussing a very interesting and perhaps one of the most important things in our confrontation with the west. given that yes, the bridgehead is ukraine well, it is clear that more than that confrontation is, first of all, our economic and political confrontation with the west. in fact, the solution to this issue. who are we, we are like a semi-colony. we are like that,

some kind of dependent branch. i don’t know which one is entirely, but it focuses on some kind of bar and so on, or we can and should dare and start positioning ourselves and leading ourselves as something independent, self-sufficient in the good sense of the word, and you began to say that this confidence of ours . we have it very important that they felt, they must feel that we will not give them away, that we will not back down and there is another point about which i don’t like the americans and the smell, who don’t like and don’t dare to leave the old owner amur for the time being or not, but there is one more moment. they don't know about us yet. and i added that we ourselves do not yet fully understand this about ourselves, but i wanted to say something else. we were strong in that we offered an image of the future. true, it is clear that we are not ready to

say there about a new version of socialism and communism, but now it is becoming, uh, another moment is relevant, and europe and america, uh, have demonstrated cultural degradation moments, cultural decorative trends, that with blam in those manifestations. this is not black panther. there was courage. and here it's just that europe is with everyone. things here are marriages and so on and so forth. this is where the rest of the world likes to talk about traditionality. i'd say it's more classic. here is to make the front unification support of the classical national culture, supporting all those and where people want to keep their national dignity of your national culture, and not only supporting those countries that are oriented towards this, but also supporting groups and trends in a degrading world that want to preserve something of their own uh-huh this is in this

case, since we cannot offer a direct idea of ​​the future , but it would be the idea of ​​​​stopping the running regression and clear conversations about what opposes us does not have democracy. today is democracy. this is amazing. this is a world of degradation. this is a world of disintegration and return to theft. and so. those who save the world from barbarism are national selfishness in terms of protecting their interests. you know how the proletariat can liberate itself only liberate the whole world russia , by virtue of a number of parameters, can protect its interests only by protecting and saving the whole world, that's the oncoming wave. this is the moment to which one can take out both the latin american catholic left and islam and the emerging african tendencies to which it is added. understandable attitude to. well, understandable, well, that is, that is rude

speaking, if we start working, realizing ourselves as those who can lead something, that is, whom to lead and there are, tell me you are the ones who are ready to be headed good, good examples of this give us even this practice in which we well commit i agree with you. some body movements. it is possible to discuss further and this is discussed enough ethyl movement. and it turned out so well or it could be harder. well, here's a vivid example for you, by the way, not the first when, or even more than six months ago, we have been for several years blackmailed actually around this was a game. i'm talking about the nord stream, which we will give to the russian grays. we will not give the russians the northern we, uh, nord stream 2. i mean, now look, what an interesting formulation of the question is already beginning to sound there, yes, that is, as soon as they have felt in these 5.5 months, apparently even unexpected degree for them. determination, judging

by the tone of the february march there, they were not sure that we would decide, or decisively, even as much as we turned out to be resolute and already ingenious. this sounds like the point of view that the federal government should turn the taps to open nord stream 2 and pay attention to the motivation, because we are not launching it. we are playing into the hands of the kremlin, remember. uh, i think it's ursola von derain, who said two months ago, well, let me remind you. this is exactly the same manifestation, that is, at first they had a story that we should not buy russian oil, because then something else we turned out to be more stubborn guys. hear how the territory has changed. it's just very interesting. if we completely and immediately give up today, president putin will probably be able to transfer the oil that is not sold to the european union to the world market, where prices will rise and fetch a large

amount for it. and it will fill his military treasury. we need to think strategically, approaching this topic is important that we make sure that we empty his military treasury full of embarrassment will be in time when we get rid of dependence on russian minerals energy carriers and will never return to them again. this is my favorite video, because even without sound. i watch any of it. well, well, as if even here. you see, she says this, these are the people who said there 3 weeks before. so we will now stop buying russian oil and russian kirda. they mean that everything will crack, they will run out of russians. they didn’t crack, showing, well, some kind of minimal yes, even determination, and now she says this one, look at her expression. she says to herself, lord what do i carry. what nonsense. i generally say, but i have to say this, because it became clear that they did not crawl away and now we have to come up with something, why are we buying this not. the same thing with the northern stream two, that is, they had absolute confidence that this would be such a blow that would shock us, you know, like in boxing.

and somehow we are. well, and further and now it begins. and let's, to spite putin, to spite putin, open the north no. yes, open it, so to spite putin so that he does not fill the military budget, we will he doesn’t buy from him, that prices have not risen and nord stream 2 is still on. and who is writing. this is written by great friends of russia. i think spiegel, yes, who has inherited so much dirt, in fact. it really looks like a teenager's behavior. yes to which you can say winter hat. clothes will freeze. he does not dress out of principle. well, you can say differently, without putting on a hat and sitting on the hairdressers, we will save money, and he will immediately run to put it on, because it will be to spite you. and this is actually, on the one hand, it's funny, but on the other hand, but it’s scary, because after all, we’ll also decide about the conversation. you must be yes, yes, it's scary, because europe really winds, like teenager adults , adult european politicians are afraid to say that the ladies were wrong or they are afraid and

come up with absolutely and come up with. there we will do it to spite putin and here we are, in principle, on the one hand. yes, on the one hand. let them come up with, if they open nord stream-2, how will you explain, yes, as long as it doesn’t hang, but on the other hand. that's how they decide to all other issues, this is ukraine and on issues of war and peace, and the issue of sanctions for our trade economy, and this is what we will continue to live with this teenager. how to do with him, except how to train? not? it’s clear here it’s very important for us to continue to live with this teenager, but we need to finally understand that it seemed to us that this teenager knows how everyone should live, and he really, like himself, this girl is good, after on may 2, 1914, the existence of the west is no longer a value for russia existence, so i really hope that we will be able to abandon these thoughts that, in spite of putin, they should return the stolen 300 billion to us, but evil is the way, yes, yes, so that we have oligarchs here, so to

speak, and that’s it. the rest the idea seems right to me, moreover, it may even succeed, but we must never forget that when we associate with these people, we associate with thieves. and secondly, we communicate with supporters. look, if i took your wallet out of your pocket right now and you don't notice it, chances are you can too. it may also be already, apparently i went to you for the first time. and yes, i'm telling you. you were standing next to me, but still. it doesn't matter what they think about themselves, what matters is who they are about nord stream 2. excuse me, nord stream 2 for russia paid off with growth, paid off with rising prices. ok then. we can dance with them around this gas, but our task is not to make them feel good. our task is to be able to say, dear friends, you know that you have a lot of good

plants. do you understand? yours cannot work bmw with such a nail at such a price, take it to kaluga and if i laugh, no, you're right, just a minute when he says, only so guys. if you want your work, we have many wonderful industrial sites in tatarstan, deploying them there, our property will be our property and our income will be. well, you get paid. will you have professional growth? there will be a feeling, actually dignity, you will not be shot on the streets, because in quiet switzerland back in the thirty-sixth year workers' demonstrations were shot in the streets, and europe will come to this too, and you will not have 18 ° at home. and as much as you want. mikhail and we already have enough power now to gain such and such. you are talking about the fact that there is power and determination is not enough. we have

enough power for this to talk economics like that, and we have enough economic man for this, another thing is that we must change the tax system. we must normalize the customs system. we must stop stimulating the flow of money from the legal sphere to criminal with the help of cashing out and so on, but this is done within 1-3 months, even taking into account our legendary bureaucracy, which, so to speak. calmness is on their heads, there are no convolutions even taking into account our legendary e, bureaucracy, three months is enough for this and free manufacturers. western manufacturers - i know this, i understand, and they are ready to transfer to us anything, anything, anything we want. here's an interesting point, because the europeans. they very clearly understand that it is necessary to save their own skin, their economy. i was talking with europeans. e immigrants from russia who live there, they are now looking for contacts in order to get into harmony with america through russia in order to talk

about how you can drag production there. yeah , for those who have cheaper energy, you know who they want, first of all, these are to our friends in venezuela. yeah. they say, well, everything, he says well, but it's not safe there. i say, listen, have you ever thought that it would be possible somehow to look towards russia at the level of management. they say it all, but they say we are very afraid in politics. we are sincerely afraid, even just such a word. yes, uh-huh the factories are stopped. well, they say, why don't you take them out forever? and we have dealer networks for a year, we all keep them. we are like and why don't you finally come to that red line and don't say, guys, we are breaking off relations forever. we cannot live on our own. they still leave a huge potential from russia and you know, now we have a very big game too. and that's what you always say time will tell us what kind there will be a new ideology and national idea. and this is the national idea. this is no longer liberalism. we became uninteresting. let's still revolve

around the word of classical reliable justice, i agree. how i love you. how i love you. and you're just you and me i'll tell you how i love you will always be. shava, shawls, shanna always gave love to everything in the world. let

the centuries float, as if there will be no end to the eighty-fifth birthday of andrei konchalovsky on saturday on the first, how scary. you know, it doesn't happen often when you cook some kind of a quote for the final and you don’t know it will come in handy, it won’t come in handy. today is the case when she not just, well, came in, but when our entire previous conversation with you. he actually was here

practically about it about something that is not always important. only how much strength do you have, but it is important, with what attitude and attitude you approach them. you will be surprised to learn that this passage, which for some reason suddenly appeared today, and i have it ready. this passage from leo tolstoy's war and peace is a conversation between pierre bezzukhov and prince andrei immediately before. eh, the battle of borodino. however, he said, he does say that war is like a chess game. yes said there is andrew only worth a small difference that in chess over every move. you can think all you want. that you are there in an unconditional time and with the difference that a knight is always stronger than a pawn and two pawns are always stronger than one, and in a war one battalion is sometimes stronger than a division and sometimes weaker than a company regarding the strength of troops no one can know. believe me, he said, that if anything

depended on the order of the headquarters, then i would be there and i would have made the order, but instead, i have the honor to serve here in the regiment. with these gentlemen, i think that tomorrow will really depend on us, and not success on them. it has never depended and will never depend on the position, there are no weapons, or even on the number, and least of all on the position. and why, from that feeling that is in me in him, he pointed to timokhin in every soldier. i think it's exactly about that. what did we talk about today? on channel one, the information channel program vremya continues to work will show. i am artyom shenin. we started the program today with the news that explosions had taken place

in the crimea, and that he had traveled there. ah, the head of the crimea was the statement of the ministry of defense. we are now waiting for another statement from the ministry of defense. here it is in this very moment. ah, it did. here it already is. so, just in connection with this incident. uh, the russian ministry of defense called the dzhankoy incident a diversion . and they specified that as a result, damage was caused to a civilian facility, including power lines power plant, railway tracks, residential buildings, a military warehouse in dzhankoy suffered for sabotage, the ministry of defense reported. well, immediately there is, of course, a lot, and on this matter, questions. until the truth is told. how do we carry out this sabotage, because sabotage. it could be one as well. in a way, maybe in another way, scenes from films about spies and saboteurs immediately appear, which slip something in there and set fire to i, uh, i don’t know. by the way, when i announced these uh in the morning, well

news, uh, i remembered one story that i didn’t tell in the morning, but now because there is an official version about sabotage. i will tell it, but in my opinion these things are connected, and my fellow soldier, who served in afghanistan for a month. he lived in ukraine for a long time and, uh, some time ago, a couple of weeks ago, i decided to leave there. ah, and he went out in our direction and thought on august 2, on the day of the airborne forces, he saw each other with great surprise. he told me that he and his wife were crossing from there to here. we expected that from this side there would be some filtration. they are such correct people. well, since the soviets, they were absolutely ready for this and were sure that it would be no filtering. they were traveling in a car with several young, but ukrainian guys with a kherson residence permit, who did not know that they had russian citizenship

and he and his wife, and who, as they told me, i quote verbatim, if not such that we had the idea was to hand them over when crossing this line, but it turned out that there was even no one to hand them over, and they went there, and then, as you understand, they arrived. here and my comrade, apparently, these guys are anywhere and up to crimea and yes, not crimea, and so on and so forth, and this brings us to the important question that we are not having a war, but a special military operation. on the one hand, it seems that ours cannot be filtered from there. the second question is if citizenship from the infrastructure is being attacked at our facilities . then is it possible to start discussing and thinking about the fact that this cannot happen endlessly without a response, and there are also many questions here that let's start looking for an answer to. and i would like to start looking for an answer from 2014, when

19,600 people of the military personnel of ukraine were acidified in crimea, out of these 19,600 people, 13,000 wished to stay in crimea, the rest went to mainland ukraine of these thirteen thousand, about 4,000 were accepted into the ranks, the russian army and the navy. who will give guarantees that among this category of people who have access to the warehouses at the arsenal did not work? no one will give guarantees to the sbu, we go further than one second. now we 'll move on, you know? when i say that there are difficult questions. here you have identified one of them. where is tanya for which we can go betting. that is, we release people, how would ours go to the sixth, if we raise the question

that everyone should be put under suspicion simply by the fact of residence or birth. that's where we can go too far. that's why i tell this story about filtering very carefully, you understand, you filter out one enemy. and how many of your own during this filtering, relatively speaking, you lose a very difficult question of the military from intelligence. e russia since 2014. let's just say that the official caught more than 50 people who were, in general, essentially spies who worked on the territory of crimea. crimea today . thank you that the department of defense openly said. i think uh sabotage and uh there were explosions. uh, you know, at the airport in sake, now you understand the order, they are proud of the fact that supposedly, well, such nonsense that they

supposedly all the planes died or burned down from missile strikes, not a single funnel, not a single funnel, judging by the pictures that i managed to see. it's just there on purpose. uh, they set fire to let's say they blew up planes. there are no rocket attacks. no, this suggests that, in general, the enemy penetrated the territory of the unit and the version in the sense, but, in which i also mean . of course, now you are asking what to do, it just so happened that we got carried away with a special military operation and forgot that we had front-line soldiers behind us behind our backs. areas. where the enemy also often visited was shelling. you know, these include attacks on oil depots and other facilities. well, what can i say here already, the leadership of the ministry of defense has made a decision on one part, for example, the sealing of air defense systems in these border areas. this is

done this from unmanned aerial vehicles, and from everything, including it works differently in a different mode, and our special services are more densely on the border areas and there are already results. i think we realized too late. to unfortunately, what is the pre-frontal region of russian russia, she must live. according to the front-line law, some governors correctly made a fuss there and, for example, began to declare the commandant's unit, special squads began to appear that have the right to check your documents. if you spawned in that city, something on that level is done by strengthening the unit. this is true, but the people are asking when they will finish firing at us, only this kind of shelling, maybe move those guns with which they

shoot at our pro-front areas to distance to shells that will not reach our territory. so what, we know the point mind we know it's 120 km. yes, there is another gun at 70 km. it seems to me that until the shelling stops until we move the opponents to such a distance. e, which will allow you to launch nearby into our territory. well, look in our conversation with you, we have already outlined what is the question for me. after all, when we come across such things as sabotage in the crimea, we ask ourselves a question. who could this be? why could it be? this is also the most important question about, in fact, who we are now and who we think we should become in the light of the fact that we have a confrontation and who we can not afford to become in the light of the fact that we have a confrontation on your opinion. and yes, we call it a special military operation. many say

that within the framework of a special military operation , some more far-reaching measures should be taken. well, here to ensure security and facilities and counter sabotage and so on and stuff like that so it could be from a point of view. here is even here society. yes, there is filtration not filtration, checks are not checks of documents, no documents of the squad, and so on and so forth. this is a very important transformation for society, please, there are two opposing positions, one. it is what you need, especially during hostilities, to learn from the enemy. oh yes, he is a toast to the teachers of the swedes. here, a, and the second is not to imitate. uh, where we don't want to be, like they are in this sense, m, of course, uh some things can and should be adopted and not be shy, because here is to adopt, because uh, if we

look at how the adversary is with this case, then, in addition to the special services , such a grassroots one also plays a rather significant role. i would say civil control. here, yes, people are knocking. yes, this is it . and this is, as it were, in the norm in the order of things. here we want to have at the level of culture at the level of tradition the most in this sense. yes, uh, here, but on the other hand, if everything is given to the special services for a layering, then how did you rightly remark? well of course, people in uniform can break firewood, you give a filtration point. so tomorrow there, uh, someone will start taking money from someone, someone will swear at someone. yes, yes, yes, well, it’s starting to happen that we always have when everything. given to the duck on the service, but in this sense, this is also a question, if you want a strategy, but the strategy is no longer in the military sense, the right column

here the left column. here tanks are here artillery, and the understanding that in any military confrontation, not wars are involved. e not an army, but and society i'm talking about exactly this. that's uh, how sustainable our social structure seems to be. e to various threats and risks to the war. well, if you take, uh, crimea, uh, what is the problem with filtering directly, well, the holiday season is hundreds of thousands of people who came to rest, and half of them came as savages. well, we don’t know who they are and where they come from. oh yes, of course no one checked them. uh, at the entrance. uh, yes, and they could come. e, from anywhere on the point of the fatherland hmm and how to guarantee that among them there is no e there agents saboteur but on the other hand. imagine that if we are now introducing this during

the holiday season in the crimea what a gift it can be in a sense for the enemy who will say aga well, i'm not talking about the mood and so on. that is stretching again. yes, yes, and it requires. uh, such a competent fine workmanship. uh, maybe using, of course, uh, modern technology. well, because it is clear that the adversary is actively using in sabotage. uh, technology and drones. remember attack on uh, headquarters uh unclear. yes, well, so she is your state. well damn, there, everything is clear. there a plane flew in with explosives, and here it is reconnaissance with open source reconnaissance. that is, when people monitor information channels, stories in the news. they identify objects from them and then send them there, or whether instructions are given for long-range artillery or , uh, that means they send

sabotage and reconnaissance groups there, but that's another thing. e in this sense, what i would like to say separately, e yes, that, unlike all previous conflicts in which russia participated in georgia in syria in chechnya hmm we are dealing with an adversary, uh, who is packed and armed to the most modern standards and, uh, in that sense. uh, here, as it was rightly said in one old soviet film war is no one who will be shot down by war - who is this? who will change his mind? and here, uh, intellectuals are very much needed. it 's very much needed here. uh, think tanks. needed here. eh, sit down and seriously, how to thoroughly comprehend what is happening, i agree with you and , in fact, we are now what is called off the wheels, since the statements of the ministry that this is a sabotage, we just appeared it. well , we're not even sitting down yet. we stand trying to analyze it. and in this sense, dmitry, i am just addressing you with one more question that

arose before and i am sure now after the statement by the ministry of defense that a is a strike on civilian targets. and this question will arise again, what if we are dealing with an enemy who, as a way of influencing us , resorts to strikes on civilian infrastructure, and we say that this is yes, a special military operation, but this is the confrontation of this conflict. is it possible and is it necessary to raise the question of what can be already somehow begun to answer? and how symmetrical this question is, just like each of the previous ones, there are different angles, yes, that's why i ask it very carefully, again, so that we don't go somewhere. and let's go after them there, we'll smash everything there, and so on. however, do not put this question is no longer possible. well, look, there were several iterations of several stages, just strikes on an object in civilian infrastructure from the vks side, respectively, this is,

for example, a substation, respectively, approximately 6-8, as if in the central segment, these are strikes on individual bridges, for example, the famous one, and, accordingly, through the liman in the odessa region. and the so-called southern perimeter was here, that is, this is happening, that is, strikes, because their equipment was delivered along it. it took a very long week to deliver military equipment. it is clear to say that it is necessary to cut down this circuit. finally, he was knocked out. like the same. it concerned, for example, respectively, and substations and waited until, as it were, respectively, it happened, as if saturation with weapons. if it had happened earlier , of course, it would not have happened, but in extreme cases, not by august. here the question lies in another question. that is, the question is what specific measures were taken. this must be understood very precisely, how the economic system is arranged, and even at least energy supply, respectively, they are from the bulldozer, respectively, to throw these territories. as if, for example, a chp in the same one, because, as it were, the consequences may be different, as far as, but that is, there are specifically, as it were, different schemes. how

, respectively, does the cutting take place there, for example, that is, you have a piece of iron, then you have locomotives, which we have are diesel locomotives, that is, which we have, respectively, not on an electric run, that is, they are cut down by , respectively, knocking out these e, first of all, and the depot, plus everything, is the narrowest part and lies in the repair teams. their rather narrow number of their operational cutting down, respectively complications. well, just like never breaking anything. simply, appropriately, for example, developing paths. here you can decrease, respectively, the recovery process. there are many different scenarios here. there is. they discuss in detail how many minis act, then makes them act. this is how it works. here is the situation with drg. this is a sabotage reconnaissance group, which specifically works on the territory of the crimea, they are quite active now, but they are monitored. there them a large number was in kherson, by the way, but the fact is that it is necessary for sure. it would be strange that they weren't there, but after they've had their fill, respectively. that, respectively, counterintelligence, there they ceased to be smaller. and by the way , there was a tightening of the regime, a curfew, and before that, they actually blew up there, as if officials. here and moreover, as if

with very serious outcomes of everything else. that's it, there is a problem lies in the following here is another difficulty. and firstly, it is necessary to correctly effectively work. uh, because i remind dr g worked on the territory of the crimea until february. we had an attempt to blow up gas pipelines. and moreover successful. that is, they were blown up. here, accordingly , everything else, so the question system always naturally works there. what to do with her? the first is necessary to saturate, as it were, respectively, and first of all, the second is to work normally with power structures, accordingly, on issues of the base. that is, after the hammer appeared, if after being closely supplied there four, most likely, by the way, the use of his wangyu. i'm from the last delivery and so, and after that the dough intensified the impact. according to the bases, especially in the crimea , here is a normal rap system, please, i would like to set up the bases, because, for example, in sevastopol specifically. there the situation was difficult with this very serious the same. it concerns other objects, that is, the very type of activity that is currently taking place changes there. now the main task is to tighten as much as possible promotion under kramatorsk slavin to

disrupt kherson as much as possible. uh, disrupt the referenda as much as possible and therefore the problem lies in the operational plagiarism will be different. we are now just bringing, that is, citizens of the country of ukraine come to the territory of the russian federation who , among other things, want to participate in the electoral component, we pass from the fact that we go from the fact that some part of them is going to participate. in any case, the question is , if we are now creating, how would these restrictions until september, that is, we put a rigid system. as a result, we reduce the legitimacy, and , accordingly, the selectivity of the uh-huh question. how many people will take part in this ? this is an important aspect, on the other hand, it is therefore obvious that so far its own efforts in a number of areas, respectively, in the extreme case, are connected with the bases. and it is extremely difficult to fully ensure protection, we will formulate it this way, so something needs to be done about it, because now, uh, for example, the case explosions. there, accordingly, the railway track was damaged, now it has been restored, in principle, but attempts to confirm the glands. the roadbed, including at key points, it is now fundamentally taking place; moreover, there were attempts to undermine the territory of the russian federation, i remind you, which russian federation, which is the russian federation, that is, which, respectively,

the belgorod region is with them, therefore, from this point vision. now, taking into account the fact that the main part of the assistance that comes in the last package. she right on drg. that is, respectively , there, what we have there is no longer russians of heavy weapons. there about extremely not to designate. there, the main part of the test is connected with sabotage work. accordingly, these are c4 that do not supply intensively, respectively, the night device sees a similar one, that is, the task is to complicate the promotion as much as possible and to delay or frustrate the political decisions that we made in the fall as much as possible, therefore, based on this, it should change strategy, firstly, in addition to the power system , it is necessary, as it were, to really understand that we are most likely, here the game is not even about who will outweigh whom. and who will change the mind of the tragedy. here , the peculiarity of the situation is included in the fact that, most likely, here the question only sits ahead. in what sense, in the literal sense, because, accordingly, as it were, but a certain component, that is, from the point of view of the long term, that is, roughly speaking about seven months , the situation in ukraine, of course, will be very difficult. everyone understands this very well to drown for the season in the classical sense of the word, that is, until november. until december, come it will be extremely difficult. it needs 12-12 billion torque. here

, accordingly, additional tools only to support the economy, that is, heating will be a very big problem, and therefore, from this point of view , the task is to have the shortest possible period until september, and to show some result, but this is not a contour, but how we must understand the classical sense of the word. and this some result. this is the result both of which delay this process and that give more time to drag out this confrontation accordingly. actually. here in this confrontation. the most important thing is not to lean, as if in a long-term confrontation. here is sitting out each other, because if it turns into the yemeni scenario, we will, accordingly, simply work with the economies. this is not going to be very good. the most important decision is the question, paradoxically it is the kramotors glorious because solve the issue of kramatorsk and slavonic. we remove the question from them somehow to counteract something. the first second, respectively, we are, that is, the process itself, as it were , passing, that is, all these actions are now aimed, among other things, at slowing down the passage to these objects, it is understandable therefore they are fighting,

accordingly, in warehouses, therefore they are fighting on the railway infrastructure at objects, to slow down this process as much as possible, as soon as you get the result, as soon as you get, accordingly, the dpr in full force according to them, that is, the constitution of the dpr, you already get negotiating positions. this is the first second naturally. you are already in a strong position. you can continue to do whatever you want about the strategy, i agree with you, but we started talking about what practical, well, tactically, if you like, you need to take action now to strengthen the rabs, primarily at the bases. this is very important for us, not everywhere, they put up a and uh, and in this sense, here, uh, the depth is more than ten kilometers in this sense, about staying in this corridor, so that solving problems does not create others. are you talking about it now too? yes, yes yes on the one hand, filtering is not bad, on the other hand, if we solve one problem by filtering another, see this, that is, again we have examples after, respectively. mariupol passed volkhovang. we also have the first part there was filtering. it was quite long actually. yes, in mariupol too, that is, the problem lies in the following: as a result, part of the mariupol citizens are the objective component, even through the

russian federation, with a maneuver through st. petersburg, they tried to travel to the european union, and part of them also left mariupol, that is, the problems are as follows. incidentally, they were also transported to camps in the russian federation. well, in the sense, as it were, in which, as it were, they were waiting for the recovery to take place. therefore, from this point of view. this has a negative effect. you just need to effectively congratulate the system of integration of the socialization of these people, because such are the military personnel who later there relatively speaking, 8 years, all the same there with the test, no matter how you socialize, you don’t stand in this system , they still leave it there, leaving some kind of belonging. this means that the system of professionalization in these territories did not work. here is the most important thing. now she will not have houses built in mariupol, for example, cats. this will be a very serious problem. that's all we're talking about right now. this is a question of what, uh, not to shoot from a cannon, uh, at sparrows, and how we have already worked out this phrase in a different way so that there was no medicine to attack not the disease itself, and so on and so forth. although of course, good options. well, there are no good ones in all respects when there is such a confrontation. i remember how

i was when, in july, near marinka, when the guys and i went to the front, they had some kind of semi-abandoned houses there. well, it's close and we're going. they say opinion we won't go here. i say, why do they say that the evacuees near mariupol live here? i say, well, they are, of course, evacuated. they are already here. he says the fact that they went through something filtering is back and forth. but how many times we did not go through these houses, so many times we flew in, but you need to be ready for this. this, of course, when there is a confrontation of this level, you can’t catch every flea the question of how to prioritize systems, because yes, sabotage, we react to sabotage by posing what questions and what actions to create other problems, but read well, the press yes, hundreds of thousands of ukrainians are filtering camps with children with women are forcibly driven into siberia to the far east against their will, and so on, however, lately, these messages about these filters have somehow disappeared. and then , in general, for the first months they only wrote about this, it’s

really very important to strike a balance between the interests of e-security and, in fact, the rights to protect the rights of our citizens, when they say, yes, a terrorist attack on the territory of the russian federation took place today, dash sabotage on the territory russian federation, those who have been to the crimea and before the thirteenth year will confirm that they still needed look for a more russian e, more patriotically minded towards russia, the region and in russia itself, yes. that is, there, i would simply urge, really not to put under suspicion all those crimean patriots of russia who, i am afraid that we will not find a criterion, have switched to the service of the russian federation uh, because this is what ukraine really wants, between us drive a clinto inside. remember what the head of ukrainian intelligence recently said. budanov yes, but we have a lot of ethnic ukrainians in russia, each of them is potentially, which means our saboteur well, you will agree. we understand why

he made this statement, he pumps up the suspicions of these very ethnic ukrainians. it is clear that this is not our way and when we discussed it. remember, back in 1914, should all residents of crimea be automatically granted russian citizenship, because many will leak out, some patriots of ukraine have come in large numbers , some terrorists, and so on, but nonetheless. we must understand, otherwise it would not be the russian federation. we, of course, to these residents should be treated as our fellow citizens unambiguously in this, yes, but the saboteur may be in vladivostok and in the crimea. it's clear that more is needed. carefully look at the situation when someone has close relatives in ukraine and they can be used as hostages in hostages and so on threatening to blackmail these people

. e. what a terrorist attack enhanced security measures. eh, it looks like yes for some time, the curfew also calms down, but this turns into frantic queues at the border between the dpr of russia, both in terms of social and social well-being, then they are outraged. how is it possible to mock these citizens in such a way that the customs, what they are doing, and so on, of course, a balance must be sought. and, of course, you can't. in this sense. uh, go too far, because saboteurs can be sent anywhere. from anywhere, school 90 special bodies that work with this and our work is everywhere. yes, in these regions, of course, especially topics. that they themselves call on the west to commit terrorist acts, but one must understand that there must be a balance. here, see another question, which er. i wanted to ask about the balance, it seems to be from a completely different area, but in fact, this is a conversation about the same thing about what we started in fact, who

we are, as a society and who we want to become or not want to become as a result here is this process. it 's about us. and here i am, yesterday i read in e in the russia today telegram that they, e, mean for a certain action, and poets to read. uh, poems about a special military operation are looking for sites exactly at two sites they refused, then there again, which means one of the correspondents came in. eh, there, in these playgrounds, in some recreation center somewhere else. well, and there, in general, such a peculiar one, what is their bias, now the question arises and we have a special military operation going on. somewhere the line to which people can afford to say no, type to us is not with this, as these allowed themselves. should it be at all, how to react to it? you know, uh, i'll also go to the arc committee for them. e meeting of drone instructors. uh, uh, uh, we were uh preparing the venue for the rally and

faced the same situation. uh, when one of the venues, uh, refused us with the wording that this is too militaristic an event for us. note yes, the sixth month. e its too militaristic and too aggressive. and we don't want to, so to speak. this is where it comes up. i really suffered for some time, or, er, in the best er traditions. just call where follows. uh, uh, whether u leave them with god so to speak elves, uh yes. those who think that this does not concern them, the second one, to be honest, left with god yes e did not raise a wave. uh, uh, found another solution. eh, thank god and were guided by the same. what vladimir vladimirovich is about maintaining a certain balance. yes, but the sediment remained, because that's the point.

you know, what i would like to say here is the most important thing, which is not accidental. uh, it's no coincidence that the scholtsy. eh, that's when i substantiated this idea. eh, that means why is he against giving visas. uh, so he said that well, you understand that this is putin's war, this is not russia's war, but so, uh. it seems to me that it is impossible to achieve victory in this conflict of such magnitude and such intensity. e, if only one power is interested in this victory, if society for its part does not turn on, it will not be mobilized one way or another e for support, if e, if we remain, it is impossible to defeat the world hegemon, it is impossible to defeat world evil without getting up from the devan justly, i'm with

you agree that this is not possible. but when you say that the society should get involved, and you yourself return to the question that you faced, the connection of the society - this means that these people who speak their opinion, with this, they are not for us, what is called put to some conditional pillory for stigmatization or act? and or force actually, that is , the question arises. the answer to this question, because, well, how would i yes, i understand everything there with support, but i ask myself the question, if a person does not support openly, this is his right. but if he roughly speaking is already starting. well, if you want to interfere, those who support further, because the question is very complex and incomprehensible again, as in the first part. we said it is important not to slide, neither in one nor in the other direction. you can, to the limit, force everyone to wear the letter z on the lapel, but roughly speaking, what will you understand about these people with the letters z on the lapel. if you forced them to wear it, ukraine

provides further in ukraine, for example, makes yes, look, actually. this is a very interesting question. this is very interesting the most important question, what would become of february as a whole. because obviously the calculation was for a short version for everyone, and everyone understood that it was no matter how it was a war. but the people is now the population is in such a limbo. what do we have, if we have a military operation, like the georgian war, operation, this is one situation. it's like the world goes on. it's just, how would we solve some specific issues in a separate direction, such as syrian war to action. yes, somewhere there is happening, as it were, but the world does not change on the site where those who deal with the riots gather, they can say, guys. you know, with this, the series never comes to us, for example, if i don’t know how it was in my time, how it was before, yes, that is, the world continues. this is a military operation. this is, accordingly, no matter how, uh, yes, this is not it, that is. we have such a situation happening strange, that is, on the one hand. our consciousness is an information field in the world, as it were, that is. here is coming, such a war is a war is a war. there, as it were, one, as it were, a front on another front with another seven worlds

were besieged by the same world . that is, we have imposed, but we are changing, as it were, by individual prisoners there, we have accordingly imposed, as it were, we are carrying out economic actions. we pledged for imposed, but we are negotiating and we conclude the deal, that is, the problem lies in the following management. it's that in fact, here it is indefinite first to understand for ourselves what we have in general, so we are talking about this second point, like cognac, so that it would be ideal for this to work out actively the political circuit, the information circuit, so that it is a unified position of mobilizing the population, so that the population itself mobilizes funds then in general rot, as it was in the usa for example, if you try in the usa, for example, now say something about the age of support for labels , conditionally saying that they will tell you immediately on social networks they will throw it through they drank it facebook you by the way, for every day in the us today will say something against what is declared mainstream, yes, this is the same against transgender people against that against here, so you can never relate, but their social consolidation, so the question is, but in the extreme case in the media space, it is

total, that is, a person is immediately cut into a ban, he, well, shrugged, if these establishments result, respectively, vkontakte and everything else are cut out or , for example, he was thrown a real amount. they, respectively, these people who correspond are indignant against. if they would have lifted all this up and hung it out, as if to protest this in general. you're a resonance . that's public resonance, and would be a really important tool. he would allow the authorities on the one hand to show that we have public support. see the frontal channel, and on the other hand, how to solve the problem, this compulsion makes the question the most important, which always arises in these situations. it must be an initiative from below, which can start to go where you don’t really want it to go or it should be an initiative from above, i don’t understand, look at the request for this. we already have, according to e, sociology shows the request there is a question. as far as military power, respectively, civil, respectively, informational. can this request be converted. here's to something. if here you will not be able to convert it to some position. if your systems break down here, if you are not ready to do this, then this request remains passive people in general support something, of course

, they, accordingly, even wear a roll there and that's it. the rest they will send lies in the fact that they still believe that this is something, what goes differently, what is formalized, so you did not start the mechanism. you have not mobilized these people, so they are not being realized on different things. she has real military results, for example, on real, respectively , informational ones. now at the international components you show that the agenda is working. this is the main problem is how to convert into this request that society has into a specific social position, which, for example, is, for example, the same adversaries. there it is converted efficiently. that is, until the economy starts, they would try to say something there , we are saving them, we are catching them, and they, respectively, are military, which make up information or political in this tragedy, please. in the history of russia there was not a single war when there was a society 100% supported the authorities in this war. maybe you remember the telegram to the japanese

emperor with congratulations on the brilliant defeat of the russian fleet. you probably remember yes, but what if even the great patriotic war we unanimously all the millions were in favor of not fighting these, they said here the patriotic war. i think it's still not 100, but the majority, of course, the majority, that's just the point, and we must perceive reality as it is. in today's russia, we see a completely whole class of people. let's say it's so big which opposes this special operation. that's what you show one - it's just one of the manifestations of one of the manifestations. i do not rule out that a competition for the best anti-war film against the operation will soon be announced, special literary competitions will appear and so on

. yeah. i don't want to say what is needed. you are against the operation. let's quickly lay on the bunk on the sailor's silence, a the state the state once again the state must convince the society with all its propaganda animation media. why are we doing this and in the name of what we are doing, otherwise, otherwise we will constantly have such relapses, when at school a child raises his hand and asks the teacher mayor pavlovna and my dad says that putin attacked zelensky explain who attacked whom. shut up. vasya call dad. remember the children, and the military operation at school, you can’t say a word, you understood me to i understood you perfectly, and therefore i am asking you this question, which i wanted to

ask you a little earlier, while no one is listening to us. you say the state should. hmm. are you sure that in the state, if the enterprise of the state is like a certain system, that it has a unified position and the state should have an answer to this question and should not have started. and if we don't, you mean states with power, the authorities have decided that it is necessary to carry out a special operation. yes, she has a right to it, someone likes it when no, then this is in a state that has decided this way and can happen. no, it has to overlap . and as dmitry asks by legal means, for this it is necessary to make certain adjustments to the laws, why did we issue laws that it was impossible to abuse representatives of the authorities, slap slap and did the state duma. and why can't we make a law that the state has been infiltrated? gathering an army, he will go to

war against us. welcome to vladimir mengu timir will bring 40,000 husbands from russia, you are happy man have sons faithful wife and love of your people. in my principality, you can choose any new beautiful girls. he put me in front of a difficult and shameful choice, either the princess, or 30,000 of our fathers. counted the number of warriors and only 10,000 people who were raised would be

if i did not go to success. he learned that the daughter-in-law of prince yaroslav himself lives in the mengu harem, but one cannot forever endure the beckoning for the time being the golden horde from august 22 on the first in fact, this part of the conversation, in my opinion, very important and interesting. and perhaps the most important and interesting of all that we talked about today, in fact, who are we, who are we, as a society that is conducting a special or military operation, or whatever. it's called we who are those who lead it? who we are , at the same time we feel ourselves and as a result. this, what we can afford, we must

allow this is the most important issue in this sense, we are also learning, as we have said more than once today. we learn in this case not from the enemy. we are situation we learn from its development we learn. we understand something new about ourselves. especially considering what we were told today is wonderful, and the deputy battalion commander for political affairs from the front line, that we are doing all this in a country in which there has been no ideology for 30 years, which, in a sense, is not in the sense of the word, here is a quote book by the builders of communism, but in this sense, we are her too. we create it, we must create it, because if we don’t create it for ourselves as a society, then the information channel on the first continues its work, the program time will tell. i am artyom sheinin. we more than once or twice, both in this program and in other programs, it was said that, of course, with the start of a special military operation, and each of us

, regardless of what he does and where he does, there is a lot to learn, a lot to learn , and because, well, the conditions have changed, and because, indeed, the enemy forces everyone to learn in their place. and uh, i think that there is a lot to learn, but, if you like, in an emotional human sense, and our fighters who are on the e, the front line on the line of contact and the fighters of the russian armed forces and the fighters of the corps of the people's militia of the lpr. and the dpr because, of course, despite the fact that before that there was a war for eight years, of course, well, the level of contact. rigidity of contact wt. the losses, of course, were incomparable, and this is certainly for the people who have been in this for half a year now. it is a very difficult task to keep this line, on the one hand , to remain a man, and on the other hand, not to lose the feeling that this is still an enemy, but this is

very difficult. imagine that this is an enemy, well, which is 100% of people who, in general, are still your recent relatives, and some of them are, in the literal sense of the word, a relative not by blood. so, conditionally speaking, according to the spirit, not through the parents. how through grandfathers? well, i'll show you this example, that it still works. it's important here, maybe it doesn't feel that way, but these things are there. they certainly start. now listen to the footage, and the interrogation. ukrainian soldier who was captured by our listen to what the guys ask him questions about. this is a vivid illustration of what i'm talking about, that it's very difficult when against you, like strangers, but not like strangers. diet participated in the great patriotic war, huh? as for him now is the great patriotic. what are you doing? yes, i do not

, you will understand for yourself that i am mobilized. i did not want. you see, yes, and in each specific. case well, how to guess? here he is, he is really mobilized , mobilized, who didn’t want to, or he is fooling around, or his grandfather really fought or he says this because he knows that at this moment he becomes a little more of his own , this is the most difficult, history that needs to be learned, that needs to be mastered in a new way in this sense is very important in general. eh, how is the educational work or the palette in our old way. here in parts. we will just talk to the person who is directly involved in this. there, on the line of contact, the deputy battalion commander for educational work. vyacheslav we are in touch now, and hello

i wish you hear us? hello, i hear. you are well, respectively, i do not know you heard at the beginning of our program, uh. i have a question for you in this regard. here is the educational work with the fighters. and how do you im eh? explain, in fact, who is their enemy, and who are these people? why are we at war with them, and what makes us enemies? eh, and so on. here, for me, this is very interesting and important. in my opinion a question, please. i will answer your question in two parts. the first many participants in this war since the age of 14. actually, these are veterans of the units who do not need to be explained, because they perfectly remembered the events of the maidan, they remembered the shelling of donetsk in the fourteenth year, they remembered the

armed aggression of the ukrainian army. and as a matter of fact, they saw it all with their own eyes and in action were purely defensive in nature. i. as a matter of fact, they became participants in the war. where the enemy himself marked the boundaries, who is the enemy, who is a friend to them. basically , there is no need to explain it. they were eyewitnesses, as far as work with youth is concerned, they are mainly guys who at the time of the fourteenth year were 10-12 years old. here now they need to be shown, first of all, by personal example, stories from the series, who is bad, who is good, this, probably, does not quite work in wartime conditions. therefore, what method, for example, do i use as a political officer. i do not devote so much time to educating the cabineers of the class. how much trying to show by personal example, if i go, let's say, fierce battles. i always go to the personnel and stay with them. i'll cheer you up if you need to. if necessary, i will show you personally an example, if necessary, in appearance behind them and, in

fact, people already see it all with their own eyes . if they see that the enemy is shelling the city where their parents live. if they don’t see that the enemy is firing at them, then, i think, it’s already obvious to them who the enemy is, someone is a friend, but how should one behave from the enemies? this is what we show on the spot by personal example during the battle. and i understand the logic of your answer, but the complexity in my opinion. or maybe i don’t understand something, or vice versa, dig too deep. the difficulty lies in that when you talk about events. uh, the fourteenth from the fourteenth to the twenty-second . those ukrainian army militias that you were dealing with, they were people who, one way or another. er, well, you've made your choice. yes, they went to war. they went to shoot. they went to kill situations now, when there are a large number of mobilized people, this piece that we showed, and this, but a little bit different story. in this sense, i wonder if you are with your fighters and they are doing

some difference between those who were driven there, maybe by force. and we know that many are driven to violence, or it doesn't matter if war is war. i will say this directly during the battle. it is physically impossible to determine that there is an ideological nazi in front of you, military personnel of the armed forces of ukraine under contract or mobilized, if a person behaves towards you, like an ambatant, respectively, and you behave towards him, like botant, as regards mobilized persons. there is a possibility always surrender. there is always the opportunity to lay down arms and, accordingly, these people will be treated like their captives and nothing in life will threaten health if a person makes a conscious choice. once again emphasized making a conscious choice to complete tasks with weapons in hand. so, accordingly, we will take all retaliatory measures in order to protect our personnel and fulfill

the task we have set. it all comes down to personal choice. got another question for you uh to the exampolite. eh, here we are. this is discussed a lot on various occasions, both political and geopolitical within the framework. three political stories, but you work with baizes. here is a topic called the image of victory. yes, you have fighters who are fighting and perform tasks. and this task can be specific. yes, take a settlement, take a fortified area on the battlefield, and so on, but you as a political officer. they need to be drawn in some way. and what, strictly speaking, what, strictly speaking, is our victory? yes, well probation in the 45th for the victory. clearly victory is to take berlin. in your case, how do you describe victory to them? what is the victory i will tell all my soldiers and officers and soldiers . i ask one simple question. in this

war, it is absolutely clear against whom we are fighting, this is all clear, but you, as military personnel, must answer one simple question for yourself. what are you fighting for, what is dear to you? what do you like, because understand now to raise the personnel with some general slogans, for example, in a country where 30 years have not was ideology. it is almost impossible, but there is a wonderful classic formula that a person is ready to fight for what he loves. my task, as a political officer, is to find those points among the fighters. uh, identify the interests of what they hold dear, what they love, what they are willing to fight for. and so, when you motivate a person to go to fight for what is dear to him for what he loves only at this moment. it will be an effective victory, respectively, it will be possible to consider the achievement of that result, when what is dear to a soldier and what what he likes to be maximum security. if , for example, we are solving a military problem, but at the same time a threat to what is expensive. it is unlikely that the date remains

, there it can still be considered the final victory. and that's it, calling on the personnel to fight for something, and not against someone, this is the main motivation for our fighters. and vyacheslav well, according to our conversation with you from my experience in army service. uh. well, fighting. i see that you are a good political officer, because you think about those things about which i wanted to ask you, and you don’t even i decided to climb into this or not to climb. but since you yourself said this, i see what you think, because this is the most important thing that you said to a country in which there was no ideology for 30 years, and in this sense, for me the question is how to conduct political work in the absence of ideology. here, comrade colonel, here in our studio stands viktor baranets. he nods too. he understands too. what is the most interesting conversation about. you still have to offer them something in the form of an ideology. yeah you said fight for what u love for what for you are dear, but more important. question we who who we

are, if, as you said, really ideology, no, we are fighting on behalf of what and for what. i can tell you what i am fighting for, personally, and what i am calling my fighters to. we advocate that we have a healthy society, a traditional system of values, that we have absolutely normal healthy families, that we have a healthy society, that we can multiply the glory of our native land so that we have a future it is likely that we are fighting now for something we have yet to build, but we have plans anyway. we have a goal, and in fact, this is one of the motivations that i try to instill in my fighters when you have a goal. you're already much easier to some adversity. you are much easier, you go into battle. it is much more fearless to watch the eyes of death when you simply explain to a fighter that you are now building a new world with your own hands, for your

child, for your child’s children, for your child’s grandchildren . and that they will live in a world that will be much better much chi. much fairer than the world you live in now, you know there is one very, uh, revealing story, when a boy asked his father what his job was and father said that he worked on an assembly line, twists a bolt with a nut, runs it further along the envelope belt father did not like his work very much. he considered it boring monotonous and the child asked him a question and said, and that at the end of the conveyor belt and the next day the father did not remain in his place, excluding bull with a nut and putting it on the conveyor. he went on gold behind the hall, the goal behind the workshop. as a result, my father went to the final one, where the envelope tape ended and saw that there was a huge spaceship standing there . he ran home with glowing eyes and said, son. can you imagine, it turns out that i am not just twisting a bolt with a nut, i am building a spaceship. and now, my task is how to show the political officer to the soldier that he does not just twist the bolt by nut, but to show him that he is involved in the

construction of the spacecraft, that he has a global goal and from his it would seem minimum deposit. it depends a lot. and how old vyacheslav is 33, but you know, i can conclude from this conversation with you that for 30 years the absence of ideology did not affect you, in any case, which means that your fighters have ideology. all right, great. i wish you and your fighters subordinates good luck and success, and in fact, if that's what you say, and what they go into battle with. and if that's all, that's how you will educate. everything will work out for us and victory will be ours. and good luck to you. hello everyone, our business. right happy. well, you see, this is to the question that there is no ideology for all 33 years to a person. this, by the way, is

the answer to the question that yes, the absence of ideology. this is a big problem. but it also depends on each individual. here she is in it at 33 years old. she came from somewhere in him, uh, and this applies to relationships, to whom there are a lot of questions. here he is, being in uh, fighting . there he talks about how he should lead the fighters into battle. how can he inspire them for what they fight more often, what are they? after all, we are all, by the way, also in a sense, we are in this situation. and we all live in this image of the proposed and imposed images, and let 's be honest, sometimes even though we are not 30, and we become, well, this is not a victim, well, here's a hamer. yes, remember a month ago. this is the hammers, at some point it became a kind of myth that put pressure on so many. well , let's be honest with us too.

some time has passed today army 2022 sergei shoigu minister of defense of the russian federation listen. the special military operation dispelled the myth about the super-weapon that the west supplies to ukraine and which is capable of radically changing the situation at the front. initially, it was about the supply of gillin anti-tank systems of some unique drones. recently, westerners have been promoting highmax multiple launch rocket systems and a long-range howitzer as superweapons. however, these weapons are also being ground in battles. significant impact on the situation they do not provided russian weapons in turn. in battles , she proved her best qualities. we are carefully studying captured samples of western weapons

, their specific qualities, taking into account in order to improve the methods of conducting combat operations and increase the effectiveness of russian weapons. the supply of nato weapons to kiev means that the responsibility for its inhumane use of the death of civilians in the donbass and in the liberated territories lies with the countries of the west. operation of the armed forces of ukraine planned in washington and london, not only the coordinates of the target for strikes are presented by western intelligence, but also this data of the weapon system is carried out under the complete control of western specialists. well, here's a myth dispelled, and dispelled in about these systems. e weapons in your opinion, we have to face some myths about this even further. well, in general, in such quantities and in such volumes. well

, for a long time we have not encountered this with enemy weapons. and what we still have to understand, find out what to learn and so on, in your opinion. and you you know that the americans, but signed a whole from ukraine? the package of military aid, which is called lenz. hmm, this is one side of the issue. the other side of the issue lies in the fact that the european, nato, clubbing collects weapons and transports already exhausted weapons of the previous classes to ukraine. now it is already worth the question to go up. what about what? i want to say that they are already talking about what the americans want to provide ukrainian pilots with f-16 and f18. yes, you heard yesterday that it was one of the best pilots of the ukrainian fvs, by the name

lumberjack he was destroyed in the ukrainian sky during e-flights, it was about him that they said that he was among those fifty pilots of the ukrainian ffs who are already and continue to be trained in e, combat vehicles of the united states of america, i mean in the air. yes, you know to the extent that sorry for the expression crap will become the affairs of the ukrainian army. by the way, perhaps i am absolutely sure that the west will begin to risk its best weapons in order to help ukraine solve the problem that the west has set in ukraine defeat russia on the battlefield. you know this, you know the west still has a lot of weapons. but for us this will no longer be a problem, and neither will we, if we answer the strategic question that the people are raising today. look, please, these 120

meters. three sevens. creeped. yes, they are port wine, what are they called? yes, questions in pairs and a briefcase ; normal toporamide ; and how did it happen that they all crawled. did we smoke bamboo, sit on a hillock among daisies. a take those 16 hummers. after all, they also hit the battlefield. yes, today there are no longer 16 hammer, what today, if 10 are left, then this is very good. and of course, and of course, we turn over the m3 with sevens, but the question is what is it worth you ask me whether the west will supply new weapons you are already hiding. you know the underbelly is already dwarfed, latvia is there, it has 12 guns. she's already given six. ukraine, and you know, has high-tech countries that have not yet

forked out for ukraine. there is an erteler, they have both a reactive system and air defense systems, i do not exclude that, perhaps, uh, the americans will be able to pull up, for example, not necessarily put in ukraine, but they will put some kind of newest anti-missile defense system or some powerful radar station. and i think the most important thing for us is the strategic task at the moment. i'll tell you now, it depends on whether we can more effectively cut the channels through which western weapons enter the ukraine and we know the entry points, this is poland, this is romania, these are the words for this, moldova, attention to this, the question arises, the question arises yes, we cut the railway tracks in twelve places. there, the head of the ukrozalizna was crying, but the western

weapons continue, uh, continue to crawl. naturally, we need to draw some conclusions, because if we do not stop this stream, then the pool that is brewing. he will always have the same level. yes, we grind, and every day we hear briefings, how many ten did we kill there, but what is the philosophical question here? even the question is, if there is an amount destroyed by the russian army of foreign weapons will be equal to the amount that comes at the same time. yes, you are definitely right. yes on the spot, yes, well, it's a really important question and it's really asked a lot and er, well, your answer isn't interesting. here. you understand this, considering that you often go there and, in fact, it happens under er, under all this. well, firstly, i wanted to say about aviation about ukrainian, i happened to be in one of the units of my relatives, who are stationed

in the smolensk region. i won’t name this air equipment, where it is, so i saw how, uh, our uh, professionals work uh to protect civilian facilities in the first place. they protect the liberated territories. and on the interception radio , including e, it was heard that there was practically no one to fly. right in front of me, and our, uh, fighters. uh, we were working on two, uh, ukrainian planes. there were already fourth-year cadets on radio interception. and he led them, e, the third, and airplane. e already with an officer who flew a lot. uh, behind them. uh, so ours successfully worked on objects, so here it also says that these planes were shot down. of course, but uh, who can transfer aircraft further? who will fly it? this is the first. secondly, uh, the ukrainian army was, uh, completely on soviet, uh, planes, working and, uh, i'm being honest. i don't

know how fast. i even if those remaining forces that have to readjust to work, the next moment is what they are doing there. uh, countries there the baltic states, whose inferiority complex is constantly e, makes itself felt for them, of course, it is beneficial to give away old weapons in order to replace them at the expense of demanding other countries. yes, therefore, with regard to the import and export of weapons, ours monitored when the echelons were moving and massively covered it, it is clear that the strategy of the ukrainian officials has changed, we see from intelligence data, for example, the same anti-tank e-e grenade launcher . uh, some species are brought in on expressways. by the way, another myth which you remember, about three or four months ago, mva, the javelins made these chevrons in themselves, and the kuleba went around with this chevron. everything where the javelin is. where is she. well, yes, a weapon, yes, it shoots, yes, it hits,

yes, but from the point of view of importation, including from poland, yes, they use it, violating all the rules that exist by convention, they import it on civilian vehicles, including in the near future directly fixing a photo, like transport is being loaded, including on dhl trucks, uh, it’s strange to present to a regime that we consider terrorist that they use some i confirm fact after fact that everything we do. today, our country is doing our armed forces, but justifiably and in a timely manner, and they are doing it at a high level , fairly, i have no doubt about it. here , after all, the question is exactly what we are talking about deliveries, that they will supply more and will supply the latest, or somehow, maybe, but somehow calm down. well, for example, for me the situation is indicative. i read it here the other day, it was announced that slovakia means it supplies you with 12 instant-29. yes, then all of a sudden, once they talked about something, talk, it seems they refuted it.

for me, this is connected, among other things, in addition, well, as it were, we grind and so on. it also has to do with how the balance changes. they have an attitude within the countries that they fit into this , yes, in latvia i think there are a fairly large number of people who jump for joy that six out of twelve howitzers were provided is another matter, why do we need these 12, as if this is something decides. as they say, if anything, but in this sense for me it is very important how much there is changing and changing or attitudes in general to the fact that europe got involved in this story and me a very revealing caricature. yes, but it's a caricature. yes, this is one danish karekuturist. how many tourists in denmark in general in denmark has always been good, yes, but this is a very revealing caricature. ah, which, uh, means, here he draws that zelensky, who is sitting in this pit, and now he is already trying to get out of there for a united europe, and uh, so he is slowly

dragging her there. i would be true, i never i advise professionals. oh well, as if with the color of the pit, the karecuturist guessed. uh, and it seems to me that the color of the pit is very kind of revealing, although the texture i would have a little bit. well, finalized and red. unfortunately, there are already a lot of them, that is, he drags them in, then he doesn’t just put them in a hole, but here the question is a cartoonist. and how much is the understanding of this, that they are being pulled into a pit and not just as pure as this understanding appears there among people, given that in the first part we said that there is brainwashing there. well, there is a concept of people with the concepts of these power was seized by the green social democrats, you know the specifics of the genre now in europe if it is this is still a common story, or is it his other opinion that is not widespread the fact is that if you take not political statements, but look at what they say analysts would be retired military nato generals, four-star generals, of course. all this bit by bit to collect what is not in the minstream, then the situation is completely different, there is a

clear plan. the west most likely, that is, when they say russia should not win, but in doing so, we must win does not sound sounds like something else. that is, when they say, we will win and then deliver yesterday's tanks, there are guns that melt after the tenth shot and no longer shoot. the question is what they do in this case. and what do they do, they clearly drag out the conflict in all possible ways, the pool that is filled with weapons. here is the analogy that was. there is a faucet, this screen. it's covered. they can open it up . they can open it like that? you know everyone will shudder, but this opening or closing of this weapon valve depends on how they feel and what their population understands about , let's also do this, if the dwarf state there baltic decided that it would now throw out, let's say, a thousand javelins there they will tell him on the porch, why do we need us, we still have 200 we don’t use. give us radars, please, or something, of course, there is a central control, they are political statements. and when we watched rammstein 1 2 3 4

it's two synchronization directly. how much, so as not to interfere with each other and what to supply, and here is the population now, which is preparing, well, let me not leave now, not into gas, not in an elevator. they are in the economy, but it's just that the population in europe already clearly understands the other thing - all the statements of political leaders. we have the same september begins the political season in germany throughout the planet. i think vacation is over let me go politically. well, it’s just that he has already started active with us and in the collective in the active season i noticed a simple thing. officially, at all levels in all countries, they are talking about the same thing, that europe will face social tension. i say there will be water cannons on the streets, that is, the people have just very well cleared what is happening, and i don’t want the people to go there. yep, they take him there. there are still legs. excuse me. this is how the politicians are pushing the people of europe, pushing them into this hole. yeah, so the people are now

running away from zelensky, but they are definitely on their own. i mean in their places eu politicians, that is, this factor well, here, remember how when they were discussing, it's february march there, i understand that this factor, this factor, nobody really took into account, that is, it was there. i think it 's kind of a bliskrid idea. as far as i know, you monitor and read all this, and so on. what is their mood now? well, you know, uh, a number of western european newspapers came out with articles, and in different countries about different situations, that interest in ukraine is being lost to ukraine ukrainian refugees and this problem from their point of view view uh, while yes, here are the hopes that u defeat u russia on the battlefield. e. v. in general, they still no-no do slip. sometimes there are calls for this. and this thrust is the hope for a child prodigy - a miracle weapon. well, it is present at all times and still the tsar cannon is there,

whatever. yes, and now he is present in ukraine, he still says, now, and now we need this and we are completely missiles, some kind of anti-missile systems, aircraft, of course, zelensky for a long time , some kind of constant ef is all the time zelensky and it will be. you tell me about the state of the head of patients. but i still ask about the condition of the sanita's head, you understand, also. yes? we say here that we are studying the enemy. yes, we are learning. they are also constantly studying us. do you know how many analytical centers are now sitting and analyzing all our actions? uh, they are studying the wreckage of our high-precision missiles and so on. they, too, of course, are now trying to study e. find weakness. ah, any war. she gives in combat combat conflict military conflict provides an opportunity for the development of military equipment, which remember, remember iran yes, why did they create all these drones from several downed american ones and from

this they have a whole military industry, and accordingly they and we will study each other and look for weaknesses places. this must be understood, however . eh, really. we must act to ensure our victory in the information field as well. there, including including the topic of methods that have always been called again, this is a classic guerrilla methods of information warfare. i you know when here we hear. well, they cut us off there, uh, blocked us completely. the european western public is blocked from russian information. listen, i'm a historian of the period of the civil war of 1918-20, just in this territory in southern russia, and so on. yes. eh, if we even then found the opportunity to wage this information war. ah, on this territory, leaving odessa, they left leaflets in french, yes, and so on, they decomposed the greatest army in europe

the german one, which was located there, is now in conditions when we have a lot of methods to bypass all these blockages, and so on, when we live in the 21st century, we use satellite communications, and so on. we now have a lot of ways to do this, and of course, this cannot be denied. unfortunately. i often heard before this operation and even sometimes i hear now. well, who are we trying to convince there, you understand, we don’t need to convince them. we need to be sure, comrade colonel noticed to show the local one. the public how they lie, how they hang noodles on our ears about us about these miracle weapons about uh, like power plants and so on. so they need to be shown how their press lies to their media, including in order to help the real fighters for freedom and democracy in europe in germany to defend their social economic rights this winter when it will be hard and so on. of course, we

must do this and already nothing to be ashamed of. uh-huh, you understand, yes, they tell us that we are there to elect their presidents, chancellors, overthrow the government. well, okay. yes, further choose. you can once you can set yourself the task here, yes, overthrow the regime and so on. and you know what a fundamental change has now occurred and notice. so you ask, there they suddenly completely lost faith and hope in our liberal opposition. and here is the story with these visas, and the refusal of weight, including for the so -called good ones. this is a vivid indicator that there are no more good russians for them. they no longer believe that these vlasovites can really be used here. yes, in order to slip through the regime and undermine the unity of our people. this is an important change. this is an important change. we are just going to talk about him. eh, actually. here's what. you say i've arrived. uh, when a few days ago people came up right at the airport, they say, we are from germany, we look at you,

they say there are a lot of them. remember this, on the occasion of the eightieth anniversary of muslim magomayev, we are filming to remember the legendary artist. the love of his life tamara ilyinichna sinyavskaya have you ever fallen in love with a colloquial voice no, singing here, so this is amazing to me. and he opens our concert and says, no, no, let magomayev come and walk. he was invited by his wife, and he sang there and they immediately took out some very thick envelope of money to him. sorry , he says, i don’t take money at a party. and i

felt it for the first time in my life, when the car in the literal sense of the word, gentle, but powerful girlish hands in a huge number on the bottom of the hands, the golden sun. you could turn off this magomayev already and magomayev comes out alive to this neighbor. ouch, think mail for the honor of you fall asleep on saturday at first remember we sang the marina is neapolitan. and now vladimir vladimirovich kornilov said, a very important thing, that any such conflicts , confrontation, is a giant laboratory, and in which they study not only captured weapons, captured equipment, rocket fragments, and so on, they study, because it is also a laboratory where they study the society of the opposite side and in this sense,

they are now studying us from the point of view of who we are, how we are actually arranged. we have a head. how our society works and history with visas. by the way. it’s like you know what kind of needle to prick and see what else there is a lot of, and it’s really very important for us to understand it ourselves. and who are we, and what are we what have we become and what do we need to become in order to win this confrontation?

over the thresholds of his holy one , however, in the country which the

lord lord, i open our

faith, the meaning