with these two realities, the first is that america does not recognize that crimea belongs to russia and the second is that america recognizes that crimea is controlled by russia and most likely will not change for at least uh for many decades and , accordingly, the united states has spoken loudly about its support for ukraine's right to crimea was spoken less loudly, but we will not do anything to help ukraine recapture crimea. and now, for the first time, this policy has begun to change. here, in that creeping way, about which we have just spoke. first, one is given in terms of types of weapons, then another. at first , they calmly looked at one sabotage group in that somehow this is already becoming, well, if you like, trends and in general, washington has not yet said

that this is not acceptable and unacceptable from a political point of view on the eve of the midterm elections. it would be risky to say that the biden administration would have to pay a political price for this, but no one forces the biden administration to give that the weapons that it gives and which allows ukraine to behave in a similar way, especially if it is a weapon that is given on a random basis. and what is called sexual secret, because what you do in the semi-secret has the advantage that if you don’t want to do it, you don’t have to do it, of course, zelensky can start public scandals and this is also not welcome in washington . well, in general, it seems to me that the danger of what kiev is doing far exceeds the danger of how the administration would be criticized.

that's right, if some types of weapons ukraine did not were provided, or if kiev were told, we provide these weapons on certain conditions, if you violate these conditions. the next time you come to washington, we will welcome you with open arms at the level of second lieutenant. and this is how we will be at this level, and consider your requests, by the way, in due time. henry kisincher spoke even to the israelis when they were ready to ignore american concerns. so there are good precedents. well henry caisson jer, despite the fact that he is an ethnic jew he understood the american national interests and proceeded even in a conversation with israel from the interests of the united states, i completely agree with you that the united states may not announce all of

its military supplies. well, ukraine and, by the way, some american publications, including in the politics magazine, just paid attention to this. they conducted their own investigation and came to the conclusion that indeed the united states does not name everything, but rather just as long as the administration. biden still refrains from providing weapons that are really likely to lead to uncontrolled horizontal escalation and to the transition to a direct military clash, nato russia i mean long-range missiles that can really reach crimea and bring and inflict serious e , damage, not only military, but also civilian infrastructure. i also fully agree with you dmitry that, probably, no one in a sober mind and in good memory in a collective the west and, of course, the united states can not fail to understand that ukraine does not have and will not have the strength to return crimea, not voluntarily, not militarily, but today the crimean platform is taking place. the so-called

crimean platform summit, where us secretary of state blinkin is participating, as i said, but by video by video, of course. uh, only andrzej and duda , the president of poland, are present there. well, it's like a special category, it's a special one. this is a special article. yes, but what i also drew attention to is the uncompromising nature of those statements made by many leaders of foreign states on the crimean platform. and here, in particular, a very exterminated position in his speech. the president of france pointed out the macron, who said that the west should not make any compromises, not even show any semblance or hint of a possible compromise with russia, that is, a non- compromising approach, said within the framework of the crimean platform. and on the one hand, and even representatives of the collective west say even the united states and the same france that in

ultimately, this conflict should be resolved at the negotiating table, on the other hand, it is said that there should not be a hint of a compromise, how it fits together from your point of view, dmitry, and i emphasize once again that this was said and not just like that, but within, the crimean platform in america was recently whose president was named donald trump and once uh in private, but in the presence of enough people who i was considered entitled to mention it. he said one of the most annoying my duties as president. this is to communicate with petty, idiots and people without any principles, which led some states, for example, this type of macron. he kept calling me, pestering me, assuring me of his friendship, and then he did everything directly, on the contrary. and you know, i have

some kind of packet feeling when i look like a macron. uh, all the time u talk about his special, alleged relationship with putin, how he calls moscow and how he behaves in reality, in fact, and like many american congressmen macron, worries more about not being criticized in warsaw, and in stockholm or in copenhagen than he worries from my point of view, but the strategic interests of france are. uh, kissinger wrote a new book on leadership, and he wrote about a few real leaders in there, none of them are here today, but, actually, they 're not here. we have serious leaders in the west today and , uh, pasta from my point of view. this is a frankly pathetic irresponsible figure. and well, what can i say, the french should be ashamed, and i

sorry. not one of those great leaders that the caisson wrote about. charles was in this clinic, and jacques chirac, probably the last great president of france, at least for today i had the opportunity to communicate. e with the broad, when he was mayor, of paris among other things in the hotel nationality. in moscow, well, and then i had the opportunity to communicate with him, when he had already become the head of state, i want to tell you honestly, he didn’t seem to be a person in the category of up to a year, but he was a serious leader, of course. it was a man pragmatic is a person who thinks about the consequences of macrons, in a completely different category dmitry well, what distinguishes the current western leaders? eh, what do they have in common? it seems to me that it is impossible to trust their words that are not positive, not negative and confrontational. and which, in fact, brings us back to the problem with which we started

this problem, not trust, because if you cannot believe at all the statements that are being made, then where can trust come from in any case dmitry thank you so much for this conversation and before see you soon dmitry thank you, and the big game will be back in this studio in a few moments. literally a few days before the american haimar projectile flew into yelenivka. i personally was in the same barracks where the azov people lingered. and how much wake up at 6:00 in the morning rise, we work here in the garden, what should we do? we water and weed. but this, consider that this is not sweet. yes, they are taken, very small boys and girls , and they are preparing future machines for killing , pumping people up on the ideology of nazism and preparing for

war with russia to its famous inner prison. well, the abrams were supposed to participate in the torture of the collective. i am a military man, i received a command and carried it out. this is mental warfare and programming here. azov of the brain on saturday on first, help me come up with the name of the film imagine cool artists, special effects eruptions again. everything is. name the access. there, too, i have a new subscription to the connection.

burger king has the same cheesy taste. now with bacon new cheddar bekonking only in burger king now many people put life on pause because of rising prices with sovcombank credit make important purchases at today's prices and turn back all your plans sovcombank people are more important. viruses are prepared from the common cold, and the temperature and the fight against viruses. i choose ergoferon, it combines

several effects at once, the fight against viruses , the elimination of symptoms. arvi removal of inflammation, and also suitable for children discounts up to 50% on all children's products. by the way, let's meet my new partner. switch to megafon operator number one in terms of internet speed and coverage megafon a it generally works in the frame and more often than some, in short, i bought you a new smartphone. well, like a family line just for you and me, please your loved ones with mts smartphones at a discount of up to 7,500 rubles. when connecting a connection to mts what is this my assistant? it is like a family to me, many are trying to

unravel the secret of this taste, it seems that we succeeded try chernogolovka natural taste of cola attention in case of allergy poisoning and a hangover it's time to drink polysorb i'm back in gloria jeans advertising in gloria jeans advertising new autumn collection super prices hurry up, it turns the prices into even more favorable ones for the owners. new banking ozone card millions of products at discounted prices every day. open the ozone card for free in the application and get additional discounts service 0 rubles flips prices, bananas 1 kg, only

from 39 rubles sberbanquet. food for a school snack is cheaper than in the store new generous. bekonking, only in burger king diclofenac in a package with a little man. five percent gel diclofenac akos quality alternative domestic now yota, you can choose the speed of the mobile internet, we will choose the maximum if you download terabytes of data. to watch videos and any other services at a discount and without loss of quality yota normal mobile operator on the air a big game we just talked with dmitry simons about nuclear risks now in new york it is a very difficult and

depressing atmosphere, because of the nuclear risks, indeed. now the largest in recent decades. as the secretary general of the united nations will rightly point out, you're talking nonsense. this is largely due to the fact that there is no dialogue between russia and the united states on issues of strategic stability and arms control . at the same time , their attitude is not only about the constitutional nature and the nature of a hybrid war, and the united states is constantly taking steps that increase the risk of a direct military clash between, uh, nuclear superpowers. and against this background, it seems like such the speech at the security council was a positive signal. zion and united states permanent representative thomas e greenfield linda thomas greenfield that the united states seems to be ready under the conditions and despite this

confrontation, to start with russia arms control negotiations and what to do after the start-3 treaty, which expires in the twenty-sixth year , listen we believe that the resumption of mutually beneficial inspections in accordance with the cis treaty is a key part of our cooperation, which should continue we we are ready for detailed negotiations with russia to develop framework agreements to replace the start. for further bilateral reduction of nuclear weapons. we are also ready to work with all countries to reduce risks and enhance strategic stability. well, for my part, uh, russian deputy foreign minister sergei ryabkov. e, said about. in an interview with izvestiya yesterday, he can hardly imagine negotiations with the united states on strategic stability in the face of the aggressive, uh, policy that the united states the states are holding on to russia yevgeny petrovich how do you assess the prospects for the start of these

negotiations? and do you know if russia needs them now, let me start by answering your second question first. do russia need them in principle, of course, it is good to have an agreement. uh, i'm as simple as a person who has devoted many years of his service to this. it's good to have a treaty that u restricts, that provides transparency, that u allows you to be like what is called in the know on the other side. uh, i uh make a personal assessment, but it always seemed to me that the americans are interested, despite the fact that they say that we are more powerful, we have more money, as trump says, i have so much money that i can rivet these warheads, thousands, tens, or even hundreds of thousands, but of course, this is an exaggeration. but firstly, in such quantities they are needed. secondly, it is very expensive to maintain them, but the americans have always been interested in being aware of what russia is doing. they are very

attached. they have a powerful verification system. they are very attached to field inspection. they uh they have a very powerful technical complex. from intelligence, if there are no treaties, uh, of course, it will be uh, well, a big blow to their ability to keep russia under control, because, well, you can’t see everything from space in the first place. uh, it depends, but despite the infrared, uh, sensors, it's all possible, but still, our area is closed. basically , i don’t know about clouds anymore. how many months in a year. in any case, much more than six or seven. second, it's impossible. uh, what is the field inspection doing now to open the cover, for example, and calculate how many warheads are on the platform, that is, uh, the contract is multiplied. but i am very pessimistic about the fact that in the twenty-sixth year there will be

a new treaty, first, a new treaty. uh, it would be ideal if this agreement could be extended by some kind of rcmd and made indefinitely. it was perfect, because i think that the current levels are optimal, because levels are not just levels. it's this nuclear deterrence going down endlessly. it will be containment first, then unacceptable damage, then acceptable damage, and then nothing at all, but on the other hand. you see, firstly, this agreement is complex and for those preconditions that are allocated in general by the trump administration, these are tactical nuclear warheads. this is china's participation there, these are new types of weapons. they are solvable, in principle, but it takes time or a huge political will. and in conclusion, i must tell you what, of course, to lead. and these negotiations in the current conditions under the conditions of these sanctions are simply humiliating

just like inspection. here are the americans. they say we are interested in resuming the holding of spices, but as in the contract, everything is clearly, defined, the inspection team is delivered, uh, by a special board, board, cannot fly, because the skies of europe are closed to fly with some backyards there uh -uh, to the united states it's, well, not very decent, then pay. we can't and uh, the banks of our payments won't accept doing it as some kind of exception to negotiate. where in switzerland again. well, the russian delegation. i am i say, even, well, it’s impossible to buy a roll, so to speak, because there’s no way to carry cards or cash in moscow, i think the americans will not agree to this, so i think that if the situation does not improve dramatically, then new political

relations will be political relationships that, uh, will follow. uh, this is the lifting of sanctions and, in general, the resumption of normal relations between countries, when they say that in the cold war, but in the cold war, if you remember, such frantic actions were never introduced against the soviet union sanctions and always mutual respect. eh, attended to the highest degree. what is not at all now, yes, the situation now is, in fact, much worse than in the last cold war. and i fully agree that the united states is now primarily interested in resuming inspections, of course, inspections, not negotiations, and they do not hide this. and for russia it is unprofitable. not to mention the fact that russia is not ready to simply unilaterally limit its arsenal of tactics. nuclear weapons on what the united states keeps insisting on, but the united states, uh, the risks of a nuclear confrontation,

they are connected not only with russian american relations, but also with us-china relations, because china is also a nuclear power, and the united states is increasing confrontation with china at the same time with the russian american confrontation and we have seen the recent man-made escalation by the united states. uh, around taiwan and many american experts, such as cornell university professor jessica chn weiss, believe that this aggravation and the general intensification of the confrontation between the us and china could lead to a direct war between them. listen to an excerpt from her fs article increasingly belligerent approach on both sides has sparked a mirror dynamic while beijing believes only a prolonged struggle can convince americans to coexist with a strong china washington believes it must restrain chinese power and influence to protect primacy usa the result is a

downward spiral, when the efforts of each side to strengthening their own security encourage the other side to take further steps in the same direction, although beijing still prefers peaceful reunification with taiwan. he becomes convinced that coercive measures may be needed to stop taipei from moving towards permanent secession, forcing it to move towards unification. especially considering china's view that washington's support for taiwan is a deterrent to china, even if china's military and economic trajectory is certain. makes beijing believe that time and inertia are still on its side; political trends in taiwan and the united states are forcing officials. more and more pessimistic about the prospects. peaceful unification yuri vladimirovich what do you think, are there prospects for peaceful unification or is jessica chan weiss right that the likelihood of a military solution is increasing? i think that beijing's main bet is still a peaceful reunification, uh, which

should happen in the foreseeable future, but of course, in beijing, more and more people are talking about a non-peaceful reunion, or so they say reunion, the word peaceful disappears. i believe that there are several options, both peaceful and non-peaceful reunion, and they are now approximately balancing. eh, to varying degrees. look e. well, we know about the military, but chinese planes no longer follow this medial line. right now, yesterday there were 29 aircraft and four ships. uh, kner's uh moved, uh, to the shores of taiwan you mean the line of the so-called air defense of taiwan yes. yes, that is the chinese. uh, actually stop it uh, to think the taiwanese are conducting uh, maneuvers with live rocket firing. true, they are aiming at the sky,

yes, and aircraft from germany flew to australia, six fighters in south korea, exercises began, e . well, for example, and in the twenty-fourth year there will be regular elections in taiwan, now this party is ruling the democratic party of democratic action. it has 60 seats in parliament 30. and where is the guarantee, that the commandan will not win the next elections, because in 2 years. a lot of things can happen, the business community is already tired of confrontation with china because china is the main trading partner, and the youth in taiwan, who support, support and

support. eh, tsa-inwei and her party. they see the fate of ukrainian youth. they understand that in place of these lads they can be. they may be other options, such as the rise of the taiwanese troops. to whom a recently retired chinese general called and in order to to peacefully reunite the commandant's representative arrived in china with an incomprehensible mission? that is, there are several options. i think it will be very important. right now, the twentieth congress at which e will be e, formulated e, politics. this is very interesting. will it be there, when it comes to connecting with taiwan, the word peaceful well, we'll see. uh, the united states is trying to consolidate its asian and european allies against china nato has declared china as a system

challenge. but that's when it comes to practice. it seems to me that everything is more complicated here. and here is a very interesting statement. yesterday the head of the diplomatic service of the european union said that on the issue of taiwan, the european union wants to be a mediator, not an ally of the united states against china, but a mediator between the united states. and uh, china. this surprises you alexandra islamevich. as you understand, i am surprised by something else, that there is one more thing that unites southeast asia and europe in gas prices, and for five consecutive weeks in southeast asia, gas prices have been rising. gas, which is reflected in europe and when they say that the european economy is generally going into recession and the locomotives of the italian economy in germany france are already there. and when do they think the gas price will be $5,000 in winter? it's not a

thousand anymore. carpets are not fantastic, because china can afford such a price for gas, they cannot afford this, because when you convert e the cost of a megawatt-hour to a barrel of oil covalent, oil already costs 1,000 dollars. a thousand, that is, uh, in fact. eh, that's not 100 dollars, as now, but a thousand and six times more, and europe understands that if further it will be carried out on the union of the requirements of the united states and an ally. and europe understands that how much it depends on china. what goods are the turnover between europe and china ? how many european productions go there, and what will happen to them then? yes, nothing, there will be no europe will become a third world country, it will simply catch up in terms of living standards with some african countries, so, of course, it is better to be an intermediary. uh, they see the example of turkey here it turns out a person and from everyone and from others and is satisfied. now, indeed, it is china that

is the main trading partner of the european union. the european union has already fully felt the consequences of the economic war against russia, where it implements the interests of the united states. much faster. we will now pause for a few moments and then continue talk about september 1 is coming soon in china, and many fake- makers are actively spreading stories about teachers in mariupol to prevent the return of teachers to the city on the eve of the new school year, and at that time in ukrainian bars, they allegedly began to massively monitor the hostilities of the armed forces live. i would not be surprised. if this were true, at least some part of the population of ukraine is really radicalized. what can it be

pure, truth against impudent lies, soon the antifreak on the first ozone is presented by a man flashlight he makes prices even more profitable for the owners of the new banking ozone card millions of goods at reduced prices every day. open ozone card for free in the application and get additional service discounts 0 rub. sbermarket turns the idea of ​​​​the benefits of mayonnaise sloboda provensal for only 89 rubles. supermarket favorite goods are cheaper than in the store. two titans tele2 and xiaomi met once,

in order for a subscriber to benefit, everyone can change minutes for a discount and profitably buy xiaomi smartphones, any minute is equal to two rubles this is the first time in the whole world. autumn collection on supermen hurry says jeans ozone deliver with love yoko-san diapers for 999 rubles. with an ozone card and a powerful tefal steam generator for 7.490 rubles. sugar pipe from a pure line, please your and close taste buds, this city needs new heroes of aper small, but your rate will be pumped. so it won't seem like much. choose a bee and connect loved ones to your tariff for half the price. with a dragon watch videos endless for free in roaming without

additional charge upgrade my tariff beeline application together with agronomist beeline 30 years on your side.