what's this? never saw such a miracle. this is a gift from persian merchants to the great khan's bride. heard

funny you. this is for you. you distribute other people's gifts. i will come. i will also.

today is my first time in many days. slept soundly without dreams, it means your allied. these earrings were given to me by my father at the age of 5, according to our custom, if at the age of five. pierce the child's ears. he will be vigilant in old age. i want you to hand them over to me. today i gave one orange to a young russian. you're not angry with me. of course not. said he rusich yes, but he is not a slave. they brought him

decorate the white mosque with ornaments. sorry. great handali to you, these earrings are a great solution . do you want you to wear them to your son in 9 moons and five years?

what are you doing? we are preparing a gift for the bride of the khan great glad that you have finally come to your senses. the lady has been silent for many days.

boris took too few people with him. didn't dare to leave the city without proper protection? and he did the right thing. retinue and prince fedor you are probably right. send two more spies to the wall. let me know as soon as they show up. girl sent away. got rid of this cursed evil since morning. i hope forever

no it. the girl has disappeared.

help.

by the way, khan mengutimir you need a special

invitation. don't smile don't look up be silent

how dare you look up at the khan?

good evening, there is a big game on the air, when vladimir putin called the collapse of the soviet union the biggest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century, many people were perplexed, but today, on the day when ukraine celebrates 31 years of its independence, the meaning of this phrase becomes clear, and its truth. it seems to me that no one should be in doubt, because the current military conflict in ukraine, which is certainly a tragedy for the russian and ukrainian peoples, and the hybrid war of the united states against russia, which is fraught with the transition to a third world war, and the general destabilization of the international system that we are witnessing and now and in fact for the last

20 years or more, starting with the nato bombings. yugoslavia is all the consequences of the very geopolitical catastrophe that occurred in the ninety-first year and today, referring to on the occasion of independence day, volodymyr zelensky made it clear that there were no negotiations. there can be no such agreements with the current ukrainian authorities. he said in particular that if earlier the goal of ukraine in the war with russia was to achieve peace, now kiev intends to achieve a military victory and will not stop until it captures all the lost territories, including crimea, and secretary of the national security council of ukraine oleksiy danilov in today's interview newspaper gazeta vyborcza stated that they believe in the collapse of russia and that he still will see independent chkeria and independent tatarstan and other territories. these are the consequences of that geopolitical catastrophe, today, the united states, of course, actively supports this ukraine and this policy. on the occasion of independence day president biden. today he allocated

another tranche of military assistance to ukraine for almost $ 3 billion, and the outgoing prime minister of the closest ally in the united states in the uk, boris johnson, even arrived today on a farewell visit to kiev to congratulate mr. zelensky on independence day in person. and in the distance ninety-first, when the bush administration was in power in the united states, the senior politician of the united states was. well, i would say, not so unequivocally, and we will talk about this evolution of american policy towards ukraine with the president of the center for national interest dmitry simons dmitry good evening. dmitry good to see you. well, uh, as far as i remember, not bush sr. personally, not james baker, who was then secretary of state of the united states, not a brand-name national security adviser. bush senior did not support the breakup soviet union and did not support the independence of ukraine, i am right, absolutely right, and i will add the former

president. uh, ronal reagan, he supported the preservation of the soviet union, led by gorbachev , even more than he was. and richard nixon will also be president, with whom they came to moscow several times. he was not a big fan. uh, gorbachev and he liked yeltsin more then but he was disappointed in him later, but nixon openly spoke when he visited the former soviet republics, he openly said that the collapse of the soviet union without appropriate preparation without negotiations. without any mutual guarantees, that it could be a disaster? it was obvious dmitry you are, among other things, a historian. let's use our collective memory. you know another

case when the empire collapsed under pressure for the independence of its metropolis. and do you know another case when the metropolis pushed out its territories without seeing any negotiations with them, do not bargain for yourself absolutely nothing without providing any, uh, guarantees minimum security measures for their citizens who found themselves on the territory of the new state. i believe that the collapse of the soviet union itself is a very complex historical phenomenon and therefore there may be different opinions about it. i personally did not welcome him, but i understand that someone else may have their own point of view, it depends, not only as what is the absolute truth, and where did people live? what is their history and so

on and so forth? well, here is where president putin is unequivocally right for me, that, since the soviet union collapsed the way it collapsed, it was a disaster. and when we look at what is happening today in ukraine what is happening today between russia and the west, but i think you can say that it was the greatest catastrophe of the 20th century with very great potential. unfortunately create a very serious dramatic problems of the current. and what about the husband? uh. let's see what he said in august. 1991 , that is, shortly before the attempt. uh coup by the junta and uh how he reacted

on the desire of the ukrainian leadership e to completely withdraw from the soviet union, let's listen and see. can't survive if we let the despot flourish or let seemingly petty restrictions multiply until they form chains until they form fetters freedom is not the same as independence americans won't support those who strive for independence in order to replace the tyranny imposed from afar by local despotism. they will not help those who encourages suicidal nationalism, generated by international hatred, when the president. and his advisers explain why the united states needs to support ukraine and not just support it, but make it the central, organizing principle of american foreign

policy. they tend to start by saying that it's because ukraine is a democracy and it's not about the future of ukraine it's a historical battle between democracy and authoritarianism, but authoritarianism, according to this point of view, unambiguously represents russia and here, uh, ukraine they say it is a democracy, moreover, what is surprising in the professional literature in america there are big doubts about what kind of democracy ukraine really is and they talk about authoritarian tendencies and talk about corruption. oh, and about the oligarchs well, as soon as it goes to the political level. all these observations, all these concerns, they absolutely disappear. but it seems to me that the

president’s warning is in the ear, that it is more relevant today than then, because we had the opportunity to observe the evolution of ukraine yes, in ukraine elections were held, where there was a real competition between the president poroshenko, uh and uh, the pro-american comedian zelensky was. well, you know, even plato, who was studied by daria dugina, who just died, of course, but now i already know how far she has become. unfortunately, her name has entered all our homes and i think, for a very long time. if not forever, it will crash into uh, our memory, so , uh, daria, she studied plato and even called herself in her uh, platonic works, so

plato spoke very figuratively about how democracy. quite compatible with despotism and how easy democracy is. it can degenerate despotism from the fact that voting itself has never provided freedom and equality and does not provide it. do you agree with me that today ukraine is objectively a despotism, uh, political rivals are being persecuted, and the previous president, who ran against zelensky, is suspected of state changes, mr. medvedchuk, who was a serious competitor, is accused of corruption, and zelensky in the last elections. and well, he is actually imprisoned and his party has actually been crushed by independent television,

even slightly independent, it is even hard to imagine. i specifically looked at ukrainian television and compared it with my experience on russian federal channels. of course, you won't see on ukrainian official television today the discussions and disputes that you see now on russian television, but people disappear and kill people. but now they have already, uh, allegedly reached, and to moscow i say allegedly because they themselves deny it. i personally have less and less doubt that it was they who did it, and first of all, i look at their reaction. they say that this is not them and that this is a russian provocation, but then they begin to

not only justify this crime, but also glorify it, and i will tell you that, uh, when at the level of state leaders they glorify this kind of thing. it sends. uh, a very strong signal both to their subordinates and from my point of view of the whole world, will you agree with me that today objectively ukraine is either already a despot or move quickly in this direction and, accordingly, present ukrainian democracy as a motive for american support. it is not right. look, i not only agree with this, but i would say that ukraine, in my opinion, is the despotism of the east and not the west , because what you listed is the absence of independent media a and free discourse, the absence of opposition, in principle, the absence of opposition in ukraine especially , uh about the russian opposition arrests imprisonment of key figures of the ukrainian and

political elite. all this is combined with unlimited corruption and the use of terrorism as a tool of foreign policy, and these are key and very bright elements, uh. just eastern despotisms, such as, for example, despotism, muammar gaddafi at one time in libya, and so on. here is it for today . a and uh, this is today uh, modern ukraine a and. e. here. pay attention to the evolution of american foreign policy from the senior bush administration to the current state. yes, the bush administration the elder was interested in weakening the soviet union, this is beyond doubt, because the soviet union was a rival. sorry , i got a bit carried away. i don't think she was

interested because by the time i became president. you remember, it has already been, respectively, the eighty-ninth year, gorbachev is doing so much to weaken the soviet union that he did not need help, and gorbachev and yakovlev did so much. and, of course, they did with yeltsin on the other hand to destroy their own the empire that they did not need any help, and i have repeatedly heard. unfortunately, i had no contact with the president. i knew the brand very well, kraft said, and i knew him well for many years before he took this post. he was the chairman of the advisory board for my small program. i have heard this said many times, just not concerned that the soviet union might be too strong, and that it might become weak, that gorbachev might lose power, that there

could be a chaotic situation in a nuclear power? yes, of course, uh, if you want both bush and kraft's grin had cold war instincts. they, in principle, were aimed at competitions by the soviet union. and, of course, they never wanted any strengthening of the soviet union, but by the time they came to power, and gorbachev and yeltsin had already done so much, the main concern was how the soviet soviets were going down. and no one can go up. here dmitry i agree with you, but they did not want the revival of soviet power, but they did not want it either. decline of the soviet union at least the dominant part of the bush administration, for the sake of justice, it must be said that in the administration of bush sr. there was even then secretary of defense richard cheney, who later became vice president of a completely different

richardzh . supported the collapse of the soviet union but not bush older, nor branded craft. it wasn't james baker who advocated reckoning the ussr in the first place, because they saw uh, the very dangerous consequences of the soviet union being nuclear superpower. they feared the uncontrolled spread of nuclear weapons. they feared a nuclear war between e republics of the soviet union and, of course. here. pay attention bush in this speech in kiev, which is called a cutlet in kiev, unofficially declared that the united states never supports. aggressive nationalism and what now, and now we see that the ambassador of ukraine in kazakhstan says that it is necessary to kill, the more russians the better now other leaders, not only ukraine

other leaders of the former soviet republics. i mean the baltic countries, which, with the support of the united states, became only members. nato is talking about the fact that, for example, the president of latvia called for isolating russian-speaking residents, and those who are against the political course of the state to isolate russian-speaking residents. yes, this is what the policy of the united states came to, here is dmitry how did this evolution take place from what was declared by the administration of bush sr. in the ninety-first year to the current state, when the us de facto supports aggressive nationalism, anti-russian aggressive nationalism supports the war between russia and ukraine and prolongs this war bush was afraid of nuclear risks. today, the united states constantly crosses red lines and threatens to escalate

the current conflict in ukraine into a third world war, including a nuclear war. here's how it happened. here is the evolution. uh, dmitry is a very complex and good question, a very important question. but first, if i may, i will add something about soul administration, because i think it's important in russia to know, because the united states is often accused of being the one who deliberately destroyed the soviet union then. i think that the administrations are not. they are responsible for something else, they are responsible first for the fact that they first unnecessarily humiliated the soviet union and i am now talking about the war in the persian gulf. when , in general, well, uh, the mission of primakov, who, on behalf of gorbachev, tried to find a negotiated solution when iraq withdraws its troops from the klate completely, but dispense with an american

invasion. it was completely rejected, but i ca n't blame the administration for it too much, because while primakov was knocking on the doors of the white house and explaining how important it is in general to fan the flames of war in the middle east in this time there was another person who said very different things to james beir and this person. we already know this. now several memoirs. so it's me not what i'm going to say now. this is hearsay. it's proven was another man who bluntly spoke to the hitters. wow and primakov not only in primakov does not matter if you listen to him. you will only strengthen the imperialist communist tendencies in the soviet union dmitry you know,

of course, who was the man no less than the minister of foreign affairs of the soviet union, eduard shevardnadze, but nonetheless. this is the first time the bush administration has cultivated gorbachev very much before. in general, you showed him the guy, you don’t have any more former strength and don’t interfere in the affairs of the great powers. and the second thing that the administration of the spirit did badly from my point of view, when the question came up that russia needed to be helped to provide it with serious american funding. and most importantly, help the international monetary funds and president president burg sr. and the skalkers. verbally agreed with this. but, it was already the presidential company of the ninety- second year. they already ran against clinton's squirrels clinton's slogan was out of whack and economics

decides everything and they didn't want to under these conditions, but taking political risks going seriously towards the new russia, i think it was a very big mistake. and here's what happened next. this is a very , very interesting story of par e to power. who are they famous people came? his sympathy for the soviet union was a clint in moscow at the beginning of his very career at an anti-war forum. and they accepted him. uh, not at all in rank, that is, much higher than what he normally counts on as a simple oxford student mocha, and clinton's closest friend and colleague is a strop, but his his political career was read- a little bit by yuri mondrov, who, uh, specifically approved

the provision of his memoirs. khrushchev always showed quality for their publications in america, and the main person in international affairs in the time magazine always showed his predisposition, and suddenly their attitude towards the soviet union changed dramatically, as if some kind of spring had blossomed. as if they supported the soviet union for a long time, but not of their own free will. but now, like slaves who escaped and who are ashamed of their slavery, they suddenly began to teach russia in everything to humiliate russia and put russia in its place. and when russia more and more, especially under president putin, began to say that thank you very much for your teachings. well , we'll sort it out on our own. and in general, uh, we

have our own prospects and our own interests, and we will defend them, then this gradually caused a negative reaction from the american staravshant, then irritated. well, then what we see now it was a long complicated one, but i want you to say a historically clear process. it was a process when suddenly russia began to rise in the spots as a powerful power, and in washington we saw dmitry as a threat unconditionally. the soviet union collapsed primarily for internal reasons, and i completely agree with you that the then russian was the main driver of this process. uh, the soviet russian leadership led by boris yeltsin to the united states took advantage of this spring that you say is the collapse of the soviet union and the way it was perceived in the united states they, firstly, they took advantage of the collapse of the soviet union and immediately began to pursue a policy aimed

at preventing a kind of reunification of the reintegration of the former soviet republics and the revival of that superpower which it was. uh, the soviet union but here's another element of the tragedy of catastrophe, and from the collapse of the soviet union , is that thanks to this event, i say again that it happened first of all for internal reasons, the united you believed in the end of history, the united states believed that they are the pioneers humanity. they once again became even more convinced of their exclusivity and concluded that and now the world will develop as we want, based on our values, based on our institutions, based on our leadership and based on our hegemony with common values ​​and and so on. and the corresponding policy began.

the beginning of this policy was actually laid by the clinton administration with changed personalities. in addition to a strictly telbot, i cannot fail to mention the anthony lake of clinton's adviser on national security, who came up with the concept of expansion and involvement is precisely the expansion of western institutions. and from this, with the clinton policy, the processes began that led to the current tragedy. and unfortunately, it was then that the seeds were sown from which monsters have grown today, and indeed, on the example of ukraine, on the example of the baltic countries. today we are witnessing catastrophic consequences and we see those monsters that have grown in the post-soviet space due to the geopolitical catastrophe that occurred 31 years ago, but nevertheless, we have to, uh, solve these problems and i hope that the solution of these problems will not lead

to a third world war. dmitry thank you so much for this exceptionally interesting conversation and the big game will be back in the studio in a few moments. how to distinguish the house of culture from the dormitory, what our experts saw in the photograph, which ukrainian fake-dials tried to pass off as shelling civilians in kharkiv, belonged to this building. directly released by the nazis. perhaps there were mercenaries and also women in red dresses, what turned the authors of stuffing, a popular flash mob. in fact, the project has existed since 2018 and was born just in siberia, only with sincere kind feathers to us to support the women of russia by exposing blatant lies. antifreeze coming soon. tomorrow on pervoi we deliver eric

krause's school backpack with love for 3.490 rubles. and up to 50% discounts on beauty and hygiene products, so that every subscriber could benefit. and the time was all their thoughts minutes decided they give a new meaning, you can change minutes, but buy smartphones at a discount and profitably. over two rubles is the first time in the whole world. and if i am not your subscriber yet, we will transfer your minutes to the moment time is equal to money wisdom for centuries discount on xiaomi smartphones per minute tele2 other rules. m. now i’ll have time to get a free service forever tinkoff platinum card on the website

tinkoff.ru before the end of august and get free service forever tinkoff he is one of a kind. look at me, now i'm back in the gloria jeans ad. i'm also in the gloria jeans ad for the new fall collection. write to gloria jeans supermarket overturns prices, bananas 1 kg, only from 39 rubles. sberbanquet. food for a school snack is cheaper than in a store. profitable loans and loans are all online, i have three approvals and an excellent rate. banks bring attention to everyone in case of allergy poisoning and a hangover. it's time to drink a vacuum cleaner to relatives. in terms of ice cream pure

line of taste buds? check out the low prices on 1,500 pyaterochka items like spaghetti barilla for 89.99. incredible selection of jewelry in the mobile app and online stores sunlight perfect gift sunlight is love this city needs new heroes of aper small, but your rate will be pumped. so it won't seem like much. choose a bee and connect loved ones to your half price dragon rate. watch endless videos for free. upgrade your beeline application tariff together with beeline operators 30 years on your side, it

turns prices into even more profitable for the owners of a new banking millions of goods at reduced prices every day. open the ozone card for free in the application and get additional service discounts 0 rubles. well, like a family line just for you and me , please your loved ones with mts smartphones at a discount of up to 7,500 rubles. when connecting a connection to mts what and this is my assistant, he, like a sbermarket family, turns over the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe benefits of cucumbers, smooth for only 49 rubles. per kilo supermarket favorite products are cheaper than in the store.

one of the constants of western politics is the discrepancy between rhetoric and practical actions, but in recent times there has been growing concern in the west that this concerns western politics of ukraine at the level of rhetoric. it's all right there. here's what yesterday showed. uh, yesterday's summit, the so-called crimean platform, the speakers of the western world competed with each other in their

uncompromising attitude towards russia. spirit of compromise. this is rhetoric. well, yesterday the british daily telegraph. written with reference to sources. uh, respectively in the government countries that there is a growing fear in london that with the aggravation of the socio-economic crisis in europe, both military, economic and political support for ukraine will decline and, as the telegraph writes, british diplomats went to the continent primarily to paris and berlin in order to convince them not to reduce support for ukraine and, again, according to the british, and already at the upcoming informal meeting of european union foreign ministers on august 30-31, some eu countries may begin to advocate

mitigation of anti-russian sanctions ivan alekseevich what do you think about this and who to trust the macron or the daily telegraph or no one? difficult choice, of course, if between the macron and yes and the flygraph, probably, in this pair no one should be trusted anymore, and the macron all the time plays some kind of his game. apparently. he hoped for a very long time to win laurels. eh, a peacemaker and some kind of reasonable person who finds just the right compromises for all. for a long time he tried to find compromises for everyone, but the fact is that his style is how he did it apparently. e. he did not allow him to gain any success when french diplomacy began to leak about rather confidential negotiations

that the macron himself initiated, then, of course, this leads to the fact that, well, no one is serious about the macron as the creators of compromises, uh, and it’s hard for me to not perceive partners in negotiations. well, apparently, having not won laurels in one field, the macron has now decided to make the most principled one of the most principled in the west. and maybe even compete with boris johnson in all sorts of militant statements, and unity in the west. not for some time now, but the most interesting thing is not even that their words disagree with their deeds. and how quickly europe is moving away from those principles that quite recently considered the most important for itself and simply unshakable. dmitry vyacheslavovich, you have repeatedly stressed on your broadcasts that europe believed that it had a historical achievement in the second

half of the 20th century - the creation of such a philosophical, political and economic system of life in the world. and they wanted it all the rest of the world. eh, to teach how to resolve centuries-old historical disputes, come to this power is normative power. and here is the world consent interdependence of overcoming. uh, centuries of bloody disagreements, and they said it was an achievement. this is the main thing that reached europe in the second half of the 20th century, after the second world war. they said so, and they refuse it simply with incredible speed, they accept the language of geopolitics. those they take the language are very militant they don't want to look anymore compromises. this departure from what they

called principles is, it seems to me, even more fundamental than the tactical divergence of deeds and e and words that we also observe. and i agree that europe attaches the principles on which it has historically developed, that is, i cannot help but recall. e, the american analyst robert cain, who was very popular at the time, and who, in the book, poweren, endured strengths and weaknesses, wrote that america is from mars europe is from venus and they have fundamentally different approaches to international relationships. well, now europe, uh, is definitely not a pig on venus, but, uh, on mars, it is not located simply because of its military-political weakness, but it’s interesting that, abandoning its previous principles, europe cannot become full-fledged. the influential center of geopolitical power, that is, it turns out to be in what is called limble in english. yes, here, between somewhere in a dead end, in other words, in an intermediate

state. yes, but you know, it seems to me that in many ways we were uh hostages of that myth about europe, which has developed in europe itself, which has been actively spreading throughout the rest of the world, we, in our professional and human life, have found a europe that is a leader in progress in the economy. here in some political social relations. and this is europe, as it were, the engine of progress, and here we have such an impression, but i want to, uh, pay attention to the fact that historically, europe was represented in a different way and we forgot about it. but although, if our viewers go, for example, to the pushkin museum, then there are pictures. the plot is one of the most famous plots of how europe was depicted in the paintings. eh, with e masters. eh, the middle ages - this is

europe in the form of a girl who is kidnapped by a bull by some kind of weak-willed, pretty, but rather weak-willed creature that would be dragged to where he needs to be. here is apparently. this is the old essence of europe, it is still alive, it is with such europe that we are now dealing, well, in this case, the bull is the united states and in any case europe does not threaten to become a serious hector of international famous ones. now let's talk about let's talk a little about the bull, more precisely about the policy of bc e, one of the important elements of the american policy towards ukraine and russia as a whole, one of the important instruments of the hybrid war is the supply of arms, and to ukraine, and only today, the biden administration. uh, announced a new military aid package for almost 3 billion dollars, uh, but at the same time, john kirby, who is the official representative of the national security council, said yesterday that,

in general, ukraine is losing uh military campaign, because time is not on the side of ukraine and the united states is not coping with changing the course of hostilities in favor of ukraine and some american experts. people like colonel douglas mcgregor, who was an adviser to the secretary of defense of the united states during the administration of donald and trump, in principle , believe that the united states is not capable of arming ukraine so that it can hypothetically, and to keep the victory, that defeat, the military defeat of ukraine is inevitable, even with us military assistance. and therefore the united states must work for peace. here , listen to what douglas mcgregor writes on the pages of amir compensates. the harsh truth is that the dispatch of new weapons systems will not change the strategic alignment in ukraine, even if the european members of nato along with washington fill up the ukrainian troops with a whole avalanche weapon, and

it will arrive safely at the front, and will not sink in the black hole of ukrainian corruption in the 700,000-strong ukrainian army. no, neither training nor tactical leadership for such complex offensive operations. in addition, there is an acute misunderstanding that moscow would react to such a development of events with a powerful escalation. unlike ukraine, russia is currently not mobilized for a big war. but it can be fixed very quickly by american military and civilian leaders who do not know the historical facts and do not learn the lessons. and most importantly, they forgot about the role of human capital as a guarantee of victory in any war, if washington insists on continuing the war between ukraine and russia, the mentality option will disappear, the fragile coalition of volunteers will collapse in nature, and ukraine will become a new sick europe and will remain a catalyst for future conflict. well, douglas mcgregor also writes that if there is a war. maybe this damage to ukraine will become irreparable. well, that is, she will suffer a military defeat. ruslan nikolayevich agrees. we should always be wary of the different opinions of american experts, as we know, there

are, uh, people like angela davis. yeah, i see, she 's already gone, uh, i mean, berkeley are actually communists and ending with people. and well, so very bright, almost fascist, also mcgregor an amazing man, a military man with a wonderful past, one of the creators of the victory of the first gulf war. however, you know, he is from the category of such non- patriotic patriots, we also have such. uh, people who are for their country. well, they're always looking. uh, there are some problems in his country, so for him the glass is always half empty. everything that concerns the politics of the united states. i'm not ready to argue with his statements. however, in my opinion, the americans, of course, can still add a lot of fuel to the fire with their weapons. yes since through the transmission of intelligence data. i don't know how deep. they are already draining them now, and the ukrainians, but surely there is still something left, you can give in a little more, but of course, they will fight, they will be by proxy, yes, they will not send their people. and even, probably, their closest allies will not be pushed to this. well,

if the poles want, please, yes, there, if someone else wants, so they are ready to fight, uh, to the last ukrainian, and we must take this very seriously, because if they ready to supply weapons and some resources. i don’t know whether to print a dollar there or force europeans to print it, but the euro, which everyone already learned to print during the pandemic to support a pre-bankrupt economy, then special operations can reach out for a long time. therefore, we should not have any illusions. we must be in tune. decidedly to win and it is quite possible that it will be stretched out in time. well, i think that no one in the russian leadership really has any illusions, indeed, the united the states are deliberately dragging this conflict out. er, can they qualitatively change the course of this conflict and the answer that i say other experts, no, they cannot, and here there is a risk, in fact, of escalation. yes, that's because , in order to prevent its inevitable geopolitical defeat, the united states can

go to a certain escalation, but another important tool of the american hybrid war against russia is certainly sanctions, however, recently. increasingly, they are talking about are causing more damage to the west itself, and not to russia , here, listen to the comments, and on the pages of the influential american economic publication forbes that it was anti-russian sanctions that undermined european markets and european energy security fell by 22% and lags behind the us by almost 10 basis points, even emerging markets are doing better. it is logical that inflation in europe is worse, than in mexico, even in the uk and germany why is the main reason - the sanctions against russian energy as punishment for the fighting in ukraine, this led to a sharp jump in prices for raw materials and goods and european.

the economy has been hit hardest of all , some believe it's even for the better, because by abandoning russian oil and gas, european union leaders will prove that they can move the economy away from fossil fuels. however, these steps are not rhetoric. will not add independence to europe from russian energy resources. on the contrary, they are infinitely far from the truth. for the sake of abandoning russian gas. them. they even had to return to coal, and they burn it more and more, if only the light does not completely go out in a preoccupied ecology. coal returned, who could imagine such a thing ekaterina yakovlevna agree? i agree, indeed the sanctions factor is now one of the key ones. uh, in the situation that europe is now facing with an energy crisis from a food crisis, which is partly becoming a consequence of sanctions war and partially. uh, the consequence of just the energy energy deficit that europe is facing is really a statistic. mm, very threatening. now the

forecast for economic and growth in europe has been adjusted downward. well, actually , like e. global economic growth for 22. and uh, what's remarkable in europe is that hmm ipo volume has dropped 90% in the past months, 90% over the same period of 21 years. this is indeed a very significant factor. about inflation. i'm not saying more than that, europe is now heterogeneous, as never before there are countries with a high level of debt dependence. there are countries. at the same time, with a high level of inflationary e, the increase in inflation in these conditions is actually. ah, the european union and the eurozone, the countries of the eurozone do not have any real operating instruments to stabilize the internal situation. on july 21, they raised the key rate, but in fact. and what it gave it gave nothing. in fact, this did not even give anything to strengthen euro. now, if we look at the dynamics, yes, there was a small e, there the

euro strengthened for several days, then it fluctuated there at about the same level, but a few days ago again, but it broke through another bottom, and sanctions are really a very important factor in this fall, but let's say this is not the only important thing, and at what point europe entered into this sanctions war with russia at a time of a very fragile and unstable recovery from the pandemic. we have not yet recovered europe has not yet recovered, and it entered this race in a state of very weak and very volatile current account balances and trade balances in a state of deficit. this is because very large funds were spent on e . common in a number of eastern european countries. there is no need to go far, the baltic countries can be taken and it was at this very moment that they got involved in a sanctions

war, maybe in a few hmm, but a different uh, the global configuration of this strike was, maybe not lower, but somewhat more dispersed. and now it has turned out to be as tough as possible in the current conditions, so it’s really a factor of sanctions plus a factor of a specific moment in the economic global economic situation. well, that is, sanctions have become a very important catalyst for those trends that have already taken place and now they have exacerbated the economic problems of europe. the recipients of this were the united states , which is weakening its economy. this competitor is also increasing the supply of both its lng and its coal to european markets. the volume of exports of american coal to europe has grown by 140% this year. we will now pause for a few moments and then we will continue talking about world politics. he wants to

live, work for a long time, he must be an inventive person. he must be able to use any means at hand, fire escapes, basement roofs, attics, any situation. your task to re-establish contact with our agents in germany my name is alexander represented stalin feels that the germans are preparing wars, but he does not want to believe it. you understand, i know that in moscow they are afraid to report. we are reports to the top. so, you are sure that germany is going to attack our country to ignore intelligence, especially in such quantity. bullshit time will tell which of us was right king of illegal immigrants on sunday at the first, this act of surrender can be safely called an act of peace and salvation in this way, mr. keitel to you.