where do you get the courage from? to go against me. just don't lie. you still can't save yourself. answer me. what is this power? love that's what your love is called. and that what could not resist her? dirty

animal i feel like an animal. when i'm standing here in front of you and next to them stopped by a man? if suddenly europe back becomes stuffed into friends. it's forbidden to shoot all smiles , which means that winter has come to the music festival wailing kivin on friday. on the first , listen, they say to walk around svetlogorsk, do not worry. this is zhenya zhen as he flew, he simply stepped over lithuania. in cooking, it is very important to choose

high-quality products and, of course, pay attention to sauce, mayonnaise, maheev makes my dishes tastier. now you have to make your main and pleasant choice. you are ready. yes, what do you choose at a bigfest, a cheeseburger or a chickenburger? of course, from september 12 to november 6, the elections at the bigfest will be pleasant and profitable tasty and the point is that the largest bank offers a guaranteed favorable rate on a loan and no matter where you are in the post bank is waiting for you per annum guaranteed rate mail bank.

here is the most profitable card for free forever cashback of 3 percent and 7 percent on the balance of the additional benefit on the savings account. yes , the gazprombank card is the most profitable card. i just need regular sex good conversation or negativity, where are you going to look for the preliminary finale came out youth and old age two lovers choose one from september 8th. watch only in the okko online cinema on september 1, as always, it comes unexpectedly. the main thing. save peace of mind at sber megamarket goods for the student's workplace with a 30% cashback sber mega-market. buy everything you need for the new school year at spermega market with a discount of up to 99% for

bonuses from sber thank you sber megamarket tell me what hope you met, she will live with us or killed you were taught marriage contract, he does not claim property. why didn't you get married? vanya wanted to give her a normal life? why can't i be the woman i love, and you are really sure. am i old? all will be

well. launch the view evo app while watching a program to see what the characters on the screen are wearing. not just looking, but looking for where to buy in ue evo a revolution in the world of shopping, a 1tv movie is presented by vertinsky

why is a very interesting production team five husbands all husbands are submarine officers, looking at each of you individually, it is clear that each of you knows how to love and wait. son, please teach me how to make a barrel, and we are driving, he is my mother. yes, not so, i would love to learn how to make this barrel, how is it not there? i am everything time was waiting for this wonderful boy to sing. thank you so much. you are a very big guy. king, yes, yes, i have not heard anything, never

anywhere. there should have been a fourth participant, olya does not have one voice here, because olechka went to give birth season premiere we sing in the kitchen with the whole country soon on the first, i don’t know how you sing these songs. i heard in another version you want to demonstrate. he woke up

dima where is he taking? well, who did you see in the next world? thank you forever for you. i must return. i'm begging. give me a horse. thank you

stay here water cakes thank you. my kind zainab well

, goodbye good people. goodbye goodbye keep you gone. jean was found unconscious in the tent. the sorceress examined her and said that luna is a river and jean is pregnant. repeat

aizhan khatun is expecting a baby. heaven gave velikomukhanov and all of us a long-awaited heir. he still has to purify himself before allah through suffering. the punishment must be very severe. even if it costs her life. i dreamed of a son. and now my younger wife wears it under her

heart. the one who will bear my name. legal heir to the great khan berke, my son will please his father. and later, going to the throne. he will keep the honor of our family. if good still does not suffer severe punishment, her soul will be ruined forever, she will die. as soon as she gave birth , i prepared a soothing tea. drink and sleep. i don't want to waste time sleeping.

the great khan ordered me to feed myself better. and he told you to eat it all and sleep more. and take care of the one you carry under your heart. and remember. while he lives. you are alive.

let's go

i ran away to the shed. if you ran away from the tag. what if they changed their mind about killing so can you give me a drink? if you do not regret, a piece, cakes, i will also be very grateful. our war began when he took the name of genghis khan and declared himself ruler. then the berke took away our lands, and

most importantly, freedom. now we are forced to wander through the steppe and hide in foreign lands. but as long as at least one of us is alive. berkei people, he himself will not drive around this steppe. and what do you live? the same as everyone who is outlawed. but the poor wanderers, on the contrary, we can feed and drink, because our gods keep us. they punish. so, if you are faithful in heart to your fiancee. we can help. i even don't know.

good evening, the big game is on air today in vladivostok, the seventh eastern economic forum opened and the day after tomorrow vladimir putin will speak at it, this forum is special because in the conditions of a hybrid war on the part of the united states and the whole west, relations with asian countries are becoming for russia not just a condition for success in the 21st century , while the strategic imperative of the united states not only simultaneously continue the hybrid war. e with russia and the cold war with china, but they are sinking deeper into the abyss of the third internal political war, because when i observe the severity of their internal political struggle, and what measures are resorted to by the main opponents. i simply cannot find another definition of how the domestic political situation in the united states will develop with the approaching elections to the congress and how it

will affect their foreign policy. today we will talk with the president of the center for national interests of dmitry syme and mgimo professor andronik migronyan dmitry andronikman vseovich, good evening. dmitry well, you know, when i watch the skirmish between biden and trump, and, in principle, the state of american domestic politics. that's the first thing that catches my eye, or rather cuts. the rumor is what terms are used such terms as fascism extremism enemy of the state i have not heard similar terms in american domestic politics past the civil war. that's in your opinion then, what we are seeing today. this is just a continuation of the intensity of the internal political struggle. or is it a symptom of some qualitative changes in american domestic policy and a symptom of a disease that may threaten the very survival of the american organism. what do you think for a very

good question? actually? the situation is even worse, i will tell you honestly i did not even imagine how much worse so far. uh, i did not decide to compare. here is what the president is saying now about his main rival about each other with what the president said about each other lincoln is the newly elected president of the states and head of the president of the so-called confederacy of the young jefferson states. the fighting has already begun. i've been talking about each other no insults. it’s just that there were no accusations at all of some kind of personal e actual or simply authoritarian ambitions, they said with sacredness to defend their cause, but i don’t want to say words to the enemy, but without personal attacks on

opponents, what is happening now does not have, from my point of view, a president in forty eighth there was a progressive party, very leftist and to some extent even about the soviet, at least, it was accused of this, which was headed by the former vice-president, grayling. and of course, his e and the democrats, the republicans, tried in every possible way to drown personal attacks, they didn’t say about him that stalin e, and molotov confused his head when he, as it were, allegedly communicated with them that only was not proved in quality, when he was vice president. so here are some personal attacks. let's see what he's saying now president biden on his main concept. donald trump and the make america

great again republicans are extremists who threaten the foundations of our republic. i want to be very clear from the outset not all republicans. not even most republicans support their ideology. well, dmitry and andranik are not surprised that trump quickly answered, of course, and the word in karabakh is not useful. let's see. as you know this week joe biden came to philadelphia pennsylvania where he said the most disgusting in the most divisive speech ever delivered by an american president, he slandered 75 million americans, if not all 150, he called them a threat to democracy and enemies of the state. you are all enemies of the state the only enemy of the state is joe biden. well, in order to understand here, e, that these are not just empty campaign speeches. let's take a look at what

the top white house press secretary, jumper, just said. we protect the freedom of the people the president is doing everything possible about this it's important to say the majority of americans support us. if you're not with the majority, then you know. this extremism is an extremist way of thinking, based on the idea that there should be pluralism of opinions, and that the rights of the minority should be protected, the first amendment to the american constitution is the freedom of speech amendment. first amendment. and now the official white house press secretary is saying, what is dissent a crime? i am very interested

in what dmitry would say, uh, the russian oppositionists, who are clearly in minority. they even admit it themselves by the logic of the press that the white house they are extremists, right? yes, but it seems to me that the united states has now come to some kind of inversion of some kind of opposite of the idea on which this american society was based on the reality of the opposite. yes, they came to the opposite of themselves and you are absolutely right dmitry when you talk about the persecution of others. by the way, it's not now that the cancellation culture has begun, but the persecution of those experts in the american expert community. how can you not know better, who are trying to analyze american foreign policy, including with regard to russia, they adhere not to the mainstream, e, point of view, but to the

position of the american mainstream media yes, today the united states is becoming to some extent a totalitarian society, and in fact, and the use of such terms as fascism is the enemy of the state. yes, this is something reminiscent of either a civil war in ancient rome and i remind you that the enemy of the people was first used under lucius carnelian isula in the press-correction lists whether. that is, it is either a civil war is argued here. yes , of course, you are absolutely right. and that it was the best, but still the first to do it was a man named maria, and his main rival here. what was the name of the supporters of democrat democracy? yes yes absolutely right. here, but that is, either this is a state of the civil war, or this, but really some kind of like some kind of

oryol peace. and this is what is most disturbing for me personally. i see no way out of this. that is, of course, now both joe biden and donald trump are trying to win over the undecided voters and the biden administration. democrats understand that in the economy they have absolutely nothing to boast of in the region. the fight against illegal migration is also not very good. here's the only way for them not to lose or lose the minimum intermediate elections is to portray donald trump and, uh, his supporters of the republican party. as a threat to american freedoms the rights of democracy and the soul. yes, and in order to save this soul it is necessary to destroy, corresponding to uh, the threat of trump responding to this challenge is also actually appealing to an undecided candidate. but

besides this tactical struggle for neoprna, for undecided candidates. i see a very deep , very deep crisis and a way out of it. i don't follow up today. now you see the way out of this split. no, not even grounds where they could come to some kind of compromise. and why, because this process, uh, has been going on for the last 560 years. it is related to dmitry remembers this, i remember that once there were conservatives in the democratic party, and there were liberals in the republican party. and so the liberals, uh, means the republican party could negotiate. uh, so with the liberals of the democratic party. that is, it was normal for the founding fathers, when

they created the constitution, so i think that madison , who is the author of this constitution , is constantly turning over in his grave breaks now over 200 years later. and what happened, and what happened is that jeremindring, that is, this is a cutting of constituencies, primaris, they even destroyed it and the parties do it in their own interests. not beyond the objective at all ie make for themselves safe constituencies. that is, you won, uh, so you are already the primary, because this district is already known from the very beginning, this republican or is it democratic? and this

means that you should focus only on party activists, because we will direct the forest 10-12% participate, party activists demand radical positions. and if you do not take radical positions, in the next primaries, you cannot win and you have no political future. as a result, it turns out that the american party system becomes all nestorian, that is, the english party polarization, but the constitution is built on the basis of checks and balances. uh, that means minority interests. there must be provided a number of pre-, uh, such safeguarding elements and tools that must preserve democracy, but what do they want democrats rather do not want to go further. they want to destroy democratic democrats. they want to

destroy the last checks and balances two things. they want this, by the way, it has happened many times in american history. first, it will increase the number of members of the supreme court, yes, and thus dilute make everyone democrats and control the judiciary. a plus. they want to eliminate, so, uh, philipposter, that is, when a minority or even some people can block to prevent the passage of any law, if you don't have 60 people who could vote 60 people, everyone knows, yes, but if they achieve this, then this means that the battle of american democracy. and here is one very important thing. i wanted to say, you know i grew up. uh, well,

just uh, idolizing the english political system, english traditions, english english political culture, what was mgimo freshmen for me when they told me . sparks fly, yes, go down to the bar and together in an embrace to drink ask about the family about children and so on, that is, these political passions did not affect personal relationships. today. there is no distance whatsoever between political passions and personal relationships; hatred in the political sphere is transformed into hatred in real and personal relationships. they hate each

other, they can't stand each other, and they're ready. basically destroy each other. but if you listen, dmitry knows him well. well, you probably know joe scorber too, who you know who am i talking about. here he has a wife, a daughter from the poor presidential, unfortunately, unfortunately, i know so , yes, of course, you are for sure. that's what he says, he says, why this genre and biden said republicans and maga are semi- fascists. it's full of fascists, and he's visiting john with a sword. here is the famous historian. well, in america there is a whole direction of producing history shows, that is, people who write the history of presidents. this smart man stands and listens to

what this one says these are people who i just think what i would like to ask you if someone would have real opportunities. you can imagine what we could do with american politics if we took it apart and said we need to save this people, this people is in danger. these people have forgotten. what is democracy? forgotten that the rights of minorities-this is the most. the main rights that they wanted to create in the end is yes, and, of course, pluralism. yes, it is, and they would have been told, listen, change your mind, you will either be democrats, or we will force you to be democrats. uh, you know dmitry, when we talk like that about the degradation of the american political system. i always feel light. uh, it’s inconvenient, because

uh, you might get the impression that russian propagandists have gathered and blaspheme the american system, and in the best traditions of the former soviet union, i therefore want to show what he says about biden and what he does, and perhaps the most popular one should immediately say a conservative american commentator, as carlson is in danger of telling us a man on blood red against a nazi background and surrounded by marines, we have a uniform disgrace in front of us, since this is an officially planned event of the white house, in other words, our government fully supports this point of view. this is absolutely immoral. and after that, the same person who supported the riots in 2020 accuses the make america great again republicans of violating the laws of the

united states. and democracy. this is how they say, uh, about the corresponding republicans, and andronicus just talked about that. so some kind of bipartisan ethics disappeared when i just started working in america at the center of strategic foreign studies, and one of the first things that they instructed me to be an executive secretary of their congressional program and co-chaired, and the republican, then presidential candidate robert dollar and a very wonderful little such a very man of polish origin clement for blocks, who was a democrat chairman of the house committee, representatives of international affairs did not have great friends. it just didn't happen and they hung out together all the time after work, then for many years, and my center, together with the

belfour city center, since the ninety- sixth year, we organized commissions on national interests. we've always had a bipartisan membership, always had a few bipartisan senators 4 years ago. we from the belfour center decided not to even try again, because the idea, that leading republicans and democrats could be brought together to work together. it turned out to be completely impossible. and the last thing i would like to look for dmitry about this. it certainly reflects. as you rightly said when you talked about the culture of exclusion. this, of course, reflects not just a clash in congress, not just a political struggle. this reflects the growing intolerance in american society. when people,

for example, very often decide that they will not even talk about politics, because talking about politics in a civilized way in america today can only like-minded people. i totally agree. i also record fundamental changes in american political culture and in the american political system, imagine some kind of bipartisanship and joint work of democrats and republicans today. it's just impossible. note. ah. one of the traditions of american political life over the past 100-150 years has been the principle of consensus, consensus and continuity. this means that the fundamental foundations of the american state of american society are not questioned, and the next party, coming to power, does not deny, but builds on what the previous party did. now we are seeing attempts to dismantle, moreover, constantly and

regularly, and the next administration from another party strives to completely to dismantle the legacy of its predecessor, that is, the principle operates to the ground, and then the non-american principle this is something from our recent history , moreover, dmitry fully agrees with you that, and that's the problem. in my opinion, the problem is that this split is this tribalism. this is a bitter one up until the civil war, indeed the war between the democrats and the republicans is based on the disengagement. in society, recent public opinion polls in the united states show that at least 45% of democrats of ordinary americans are not ready to marry republicans. even at this level, you understand this. e such a demarcation and a again. it seems to me that the basis of this division

an objective change in american society, which is estimated by various representatives of this society as diametrically opposed and the main of these changes. there is a decrease in the proportion of white americans and the prospect of their transformation into an absolute minority, despite the fact that even 50 years ago whites accounted for 80 e, 88 89 almost 90% of the american population, i would add correct me. if you don't agree and whites are basically something that annoys them, it's not that this is happening. and the fact that this is happening according to the plan of the democrats. yes? eh, just ignoring laws and allowing. uh, go across the mexican border. to anyone, and as much as they want , that is, the democratic party uses demographic changes, uses the requirements of revising the american identity of american

history of american values ​​for the sake of their political interests in order to become a permanent majority party to establish a de facto one-party. that's right, yes absolutely right, not only that, i'll tell you. e bill clinton at one of his speeches in front of black university. i forgot the name of this university in new york, he speaks with great joy and patrick bikin says, and what is he happy about and he says forty-three in the forty-third year 2043, whites will be in the minority, and he says, why rejoice? this country was created from completely different human material on the basis of completely different values. and if you lose this material and these values, what is the

future of this country. with whom will you go into the future and your children? where will they go and how by the way at the highest level dmitry you must remember, probably the last time. when has the speaker of the house of representatives worked constructively with the president? it was you who worked with ronald reagan, that's it, after that it was over. only the battle for annihilation is no compromise, and this, of course, alas, has become such a common place, but for some reason, the democrats, using their advantages in the media, are trying to accuse the republicans of wanting to establish totalism. they forbid people to choose what they want and of course i have more i just heard this thread today. that's not

before, like komel lies, they don't stop, for example, a decision was made by the supreme judges on abortion. they present it as a ban on abortion, no ban. no. it's just a regulation of this process, not so that the mothers of that last day could destroy their children, but this is presented as a ban on abortion. well, of course, we in russia are most interested in how this american internal political bitterness will affect on their foreign policy, including policy towards russia and today. we are witnessing not only confrontation between our countries. well, the lack of normal dialogue. even the absence of a normal diplomatic dialogue. yesterday. john sullivan left moscow, and the ambassador of the united states of russia, who has worked here since 1915, is a routine replacement,

but again, in the conditions of the american internal political struggle. and it is unlikely that the hearings in the united states senate on the approval of the candidacy of the next ambassador will go smoothly, because it will again be used for the internal political interests of one party and another party. and it turns out that we will live in a situation without a full-fledged ambassador of the united states . and dmitry has been in moscow for an indefinitely long time. do you agree with this? what significance do you attach to this and do you know. uh, as an insider in washington circles, who can be considered for the position of john sallion's successor, that is, the next us ambassador to russia dmitry well , first of all, unfortunately, i don't know. hey mr. sallin. i knew all the american words in moscow, uh, starting with jack broom when i got the opportunity during perestroika. the

soviet union is coming with him. i don't know and i'll be honest. in general, i don’t really suffer about this, because, apparently, due to the nature of, uh, russian-american relations and due to the war. e against the embassies that washington started but which at some stage were forced to join moscow, in general, mr. from sallin. nothing constructive here makes it possible and its not accepted on a serious level, but it is supposed to take his place. it hasn't been officially announced yet. and this, probably, can change, but for now , lindsey is supposed to take his place in washington, tracy today, and the american ambassador to the army. and where does she like to talk about, and what is her task, how does she see her task as promoting joint democracies? and the values ​​of the united states and armenia

. well, i don't think moscow will find it promising, and she was at one time the second person in the embassy in moscow as an adviser. envoy, but also, as it were, they did not particularly get to know her, and she never occupied at least some serious posts in the state department in general in the central apparatus of the american government. why am i saying this, not to denigrate her, but simply to note that, although, of course, after all, armenia is an important country, but not completely such a great power as russia but in addition, the future ambassador, if she is an ambassador, but there is no experience of those connections and that status that would help her to be effective washington i i hope that i'm wrong, but i'm afraid that in moscow this appointment, if it takes place, well, in general, too. they will take it as yet another signal of not

taking russia seriously enough. dmitry, i completely agree with you. on two things, first, of course, given the current state of russian american relations, the ambassador cannot fundamentally change them for the better. it is not his job that the ambassador operates within clearly defined limits, which in turn are determined by the capital that sent him, but again in the lack of dialogue between russia and the united states at the level of heads of state at the level of foreign ministers, the absence of any permanent dialogue at all, the ambassador, oddly enough. well , almost the only channel for today of communication between russia and the united states. yes, of course, there are problems here too, but it is important that this channel exists, it is important that this channel existed. and by the way, to say, uh, john sullivan, he was appointed by donald trump in the nineteenth year before that. he was the first assistant secretary of state of the united states. and he never

i did not allow myself. uh, intervene in russian domestic politics. that is, he acted very professionally, as an ambassador, and personally, john sullivan did not cause any additional damage to russian american relations, at least. you listen to what you just said the criteria for evaluating the ambassador that you hated the special damage. this is also the state in which our relations are absolutely right, but i really want, of course, that, uh , mrs. instructions were given, starting from a real dialogue, and then regardless of the background and status of the person. i have no doubt that we took such a person seriously in moscow, i completely agree with you. dmitry andronik on vsetsevich. thanks a lot for this conversation. very interesting. we will now pause for a few moments and then we will talk. 21 filtration camps for ukrainians

that's how many of them, according to the west, allegedly organized by russia, these are points for temporary accommodation of citizens. these are the people who run from under ukrainian. fire, though from the evidence there is only one satellite image. is it possible to see at least something on it, as well as how a photo of chinese tourists was turned into a brazen fake special operation about this coming soon antifreak tomorrow on first

why do i invest in the best opportunities always in a crisis is it time to learn new investments? install the tinkoff investment application, complete the course and receive a package of shares worth up to 20,000 rubles as a gift. tinkoff he is the only one in the

lenta guarantee of the best discounts butter 1.000. lakes 400 g. 299 rub. we found a cheaper purchase at our expense lenta now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with credit from sovcombank, make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your plans. sovcombank people are more important, upgrade your tariff with sappers beeline application connect loved ones to the tariff at half price, watch videos endlessly and for free or get more internet in roaming without paying 30 years on your side.

deposit at a favorable rate of 8%. this discovery is a novelty in the line of artra cream arthroxicam three-component the composition contributes to the accelerated penetration of components into the conception of pain with modern, anesthetic maximum concentration arthroxicam for accelerated penetration into the focus of pain is a great way to teach a child financial literacy. free tinkoff junior card the child will learn how to manage money right in the tinkoff app. and it will be convenient for parents to keep track of their spending. issue a tinkoff junior card and we will help the child in the first financial matters of tinkoff, he is the only

magnit cosmetic who cares. means love 30 off percent on home textiles more discounts in the magnet mobile application. this is ivan and he has just found the apartment he has been looking for for a long time. now i have applied for a mortgage. and got approval from the bank. ivan registered the deal. and now he has become the owner of a loft in the west of the capital, because an apartment is now being bought in my yard. there 's a big game on the air today, i think the world is one step closer to a nuclear holocaust because the

british foreign secretary of the trails who recently said without batting an eyelid that she being prime minister can push the nuclear button. at the same time, she did not give any details under what circumstances she, uh, would go for such a decision by being elected the leader of the conservative party and, accordingly, became the prime minister. e countries and here is igor georgievich what surprises me the most here. this is what it seems to me in the uk there is a consistently negative selection, because a few years ago to imagine that a wrestler johnson and even more so a rhinestone leaf would become residents, downing, among, 10, well, in a nightmare i didn’t have a dream. i just remember in 2016, when only boris johnson was appointed minister of foreign affairs. i asked my acquaintances at the royal institute of international. and chaos chat, it wasn't an undesirable organization back then, so, uh, what's going on, has the uk gone crazy and my uh, acquaintances,

there, uh in the chat house said, don't you worry, uh, no real power . uh, he he will perform decorative functions of no real power. johnson will not fight him, so everything will be it's up to theresa may who is an adult, who is prime minister. here it will determine british foreign policy 3 years have passed and boris johnson became prime minister. so now a sheet of rhinestones in comparison, with which even boris johnson looks very respectable igor georgievich what's going on? well, let's start with the fact that, of course, listraz can press a button. true, nothing will fly until the americans give the go-ahead, after all, their own means of delivering nuclear charges. britain doesn't, so it's basically a statement was made solely for internal use to show how cool i am. i'm the second margaret thatcher. resolutely and without stopping before anything, with regard to the fact that the leaves became the prime minister, but really this is an obvious fact of the degradation of the british

political elites, moreover, everything seems to be normal outwardly. yes, good education. a good university, yes, that is why we are used to measuring the british elite, it is present, but, of course, the level of competence. yes, his buildings and those expressions of situations that have already hit the whole the trust shows that this is really, uh, a completely obvious process and so far there are no signs that this process will be stopped and that decent policies will really take place, which will be worthy of the highest policy, but based on british interests. and even let's look at those statements that have been butchered, but on this path to leadership in the conservative party. tomorrow she will be prime minister. yes, the main foreign political agenda is the main one, and we will support ukraine until the end. with putin and we will fight the chinese, uh, in the conditions of the economic crisis. ah. the only promise to lower taxes, but at the same time, uh, how

to support the british, who can't already pay it. that is, here to take the means in order to carry out the necessary economic reforms. and yes, the same margareteysher, when the reform was carried out. she first took care of where to get these funds, so i think the british are in for hard times, the next time in these hard times we will talk more. now i want to clarify a clarifying question on british foreign policy, namely about the prospects for the international position of great britain, because you really listed that the list will once again pursue even more, as well as, or at least the same configuration course towards russia and declares that ukraine must win. this is her mantra. china is a threat. uh, for the uk, moreover, the list of times, apparently, it will spoil relations even more with the european union, she is here. uh, another statement from her. she could not answer, france for her for the uk, it is friend or foe, and it claims that the uk will withdraw from the

european convention on human rights in order to freely evict e-migrants. she is taking a tougher stance on the terms of the brexit renegotiation, and the border between northern ireland and the republic of ireland. in the united states, even if the financial times is to be believed, the biden administration is not very happy that such a radical uh person will come uh to downing street. so what's the picture looms? yes, only with ukraine will the uk have good relations, it turns out during registration, what will happen with global breate? yes, this is global britain. well, yes, this is official to me yet a political strategy that was launched even before the liter with uh, still maeve. practically, but it seems to me that this is an attempt to pass off wishful thinking, of course, there is no financial,

political or resource potential of britain in order to be a global power today no, that's why it's, of course, nice to send back to the former imperial past saying that we are still hoo, that we can still influence something. we will now conclude an agreement with the leading players, but something is not visible, not an agreement with the united states, which has long been said that relations with europe are really deteriorating. yes, the same e wars over fish, but over the problem of the northern irish border, which we will remember, so again i don’t see, but i will remind you that after all she becomes prime minister with posts the foreign and commonwealth office is here, so there is no chance that britain's position in the world as a global external political power. again, in my opinion, not yet visible. well, it’s not in vain that the head of scotland, nicholas stranger. she stated that the victory of the tracks would be a disaster for the uk and i fully agree with igor georovich that this is not only a political disaster, not only

foreign policy, domestic economic and, perhaps, first of all, but inside the uk where there is a very acute economic crisis the times just wrote yesterday that british police fear riots. and this winter, ah, and not without reason. uh, bloomberg reportedly citing industry organization make uk that up to 60% of uk factories could close due to rising electricity prices from 14:00 to 20:00. well, against this background, the list of tracks promises. live freeze electricity prices for home holdings freeze prices. yes and now, it seems to me, alexander vyacheslavovich, it is very remarkable that the

prime minister, a conservative, for whom margaret thatcher seems to be an idol, appeals with some kind of marxist-leninist tool. price freeze, yes, uh, and so on. here. uh, will the elistration manage to decide. uh, this is the problem of the energy crisis. and what are the prospects for the british economy? well, the prospects are difficult, but let's understand. how did they get out of the coronavirus? just took printed 750 billion pounds. yes, inflation is now 10 even 11, then it will be 18, nevertheless. they took a very simple path to the third world station and when bloomberg is now writing that the british pound is already a currency of developing countries, because it can devalue by 30% and its fate. eh, sad. uh, and when we talk about uh evaluation. uh, uh, other more serious publications, the same ecomist, which is associated with the rothschilds. well

, such a city magazine, he will agree, he came out with such a title as a caustic sheet - this is a conservative the leaders of the little country in the era of the big held on. uh, and then a burgerburger. uh, writes that china india well, there, and the bunker writes that uh