well, you said, madness madness it seems to me that yesterday we arrived at this beautiful formula. eh, after all, such fat, er, lazy and well-fed times gave rise to. so to say, there is indeed such a generation of politicians in europe. in general, i think, remember when françois aland came to france. i thought, lord god, my blessed virgin mary well, it's just a joke, it's gone. yes, you are right, it turned out that this is not a joke. here. and where was he just in the picture? here is schultz - this is a joke, but the most terrible thing. what is it, what is it same infinite is to say, spiral. i'm afraid to imagine if, compared to schultz , the alands seem to me, so to speak, a politician. what will happen next. they say, happy is the one who knows how to admire the smile of someone else's soul, an important responsible and joyful moment is now and we will do it together with yulia baranovskaya and her heroes from the letter from the front column.

i didn’t even suspect that our son philip would be with a special operation philip left for a special operation first in honest april, he got in touch three times in these three months, everything was explained by the fact that bad connection. let's get acquainted. what's your name bad

story. and when i was about three years old bandera, because well, as it is. the marines have a good saying, no one but us. even a lump came up. well, where should we go to defend our interests to fight, for our citizens, these are all said. a man is a man, how the family reacted, the father supports, and my mother, my mother

, the family is very worried, initially i thought that i went to another job. i did not know that philip was on a special operation. i watched in the evening the tv is cut. i was young, maybe i would have gone with him with philip. there is no connection at all. you cannot

contact your parents. you know, we have a great opportunity now to say hello to them. mom, what is the name of dad alexander grigorievich alexander grigorievich borisovna met your son here, we want to say hello to you. mum hello. i miss you so much, it will all be over soon. i 'll be back somehow. so be healthy. mom on emotions, thank you very much. i am waiting for you very , very much. you are my only son. we we love you very much, we miss you, we are waiting for you with a victory, we hold you, fists everything will be ok. there are no words, really, how poignant it is, but this guy fidel yes , without any political science, there are any complex ones, there are intersections of geopolitical interests and so on, he explained why he heard his phrase there,

that they are doing bastards that's all political science. good afternoon, the information channel on the first continues its work on the air, time to remember, my name is alexander gordon, what's on today? the other day vladimir putin signed a very important document with my document point of view. it is called the concept of humanitarian policy in russia and abroad. that is, how, with the help of the so-called soft power of russia, will it form and strengthen the objective perception of our country in the world? according to this concept, the goal is to protect the preservation and promotion of the traditions and ideals inherent in the russian world. that is why and from whom it is necessary to protect, where it is

necessary to promote and how it can end if this is not done, we will try to figure it out today, in the meantime, i propose to remember. how did this concept of russian world and russian civilization? we did not take part in any of the great events that shook europe, but we had our own special destiny. this is russia. its vast expanse was swallowed up by the mongol invasions to reach. this goal. we had to lead a very special existence. don't you find. you are something significant in the current state of russia, something that is a parasite of the future historian in the 19th century in russian society , disputes about the ways of the country's development did not subside, who we are and where we are going is a question that occupies russians thinkers, philosophers, politicians and ordinary citizens for more than a century. as a result , two directions of slavophiles appeared in philosophical thought, who began to talk about a special path for russia and westerners, who insisted on the need for

russia to follow the path of western civilization, especially in the field of social organization of civil life and culture. i have never recognized, even if it is not a criminal trait, which some caring and even zealous, but little following patriots certainly want. and between russia and western europe that vera connects her so closely with europe with which the language breeds. the fact is that europe does not recognize us as her own. she sees in russia and in the slavs in general something alien to her, and at the same time something that cannot serve for her, simple, material, from which she could benefit from the revolution of 1917, created a new state. the soviet union, which began to be positioned by the west as a very simple systemic enemy, a rigid division into its own alien played an important role in the formation of both soviet society and western and only during the second world war the world united to defeat the common enemies, on september 7 , 1945, the victory parade of the allied forces of the ussr, the usa, great britain and

france, then the west, united by the soviet union , was able to defeat the common enemy, but the allied idyll did not last long and with separation berlin and the world was divided into two camps of capitalists and communists. and now i'm thinking about everything about the war. about the capitalist of these damned why are they all rocking the boat at us. after the collapse of the soviet union the old discussion between westernizers and slavophiles flared up again, the west decided that the new state wanted and could only play by the rules and values ​​of the western world, while the main public demand in russia was unrestrained. the thirst for consumption according to western standards and therefore the supporters of isolationism had no chance. however, the illusory dreams of becoming a full-fledged partner with the west were not destined to come true in their last appeal to the citizens of russia on december 31, 1999. the first president of

russia boris nikolaevich yeltsin said, i ask forgiveness for not justifying some of the hopes of those people who believed that we could jump from the gray, stagnant totalitarian past into a bright , rich civilized future with one jerk, with one stroke, with one sign. i myself believed in it, it seemed like one jerk, and everything was given. with one jerk, they didn’t succeed in something. i was too naive to understand. the image of the future, which the first president of russia so aspired to, was associated with the desire to enter the community of western powers. and now it is already clear that no matter how russia aspired to the west game on an equal footing is unlikely. perhaps the centuries-long confrontation between russian and western civilizations with periodic cycles of military conflicts and relatively peaceful coexistence, according to the theory of civilization of the russian scientist danilevsky, should inevitably lead to a clash in which one of the civilizations. it may just disappear that the world community was warned by vladimir putin during

his online speech at the economic forum in davos in january last year. there is the likelihood of facing a real disruption in world development and fraught with the struggle of all against all. with attempts to resolve the overdue contradiction through the search for internal and external enemies. with the destruction of not only such traditional values, and we in russia cherish this as a family, but i will also note basic freedoms, including the right to choose and privacy. here, that the social and value crisis is already turning into negative demographic consequences, due to which humanity risks losing entire civilizational and cultural continents. our common responsibility today is to avoid such a dystopian perspective to ensure development along a different positive, harmonious

and creative trajectory. there is such a point of view. it has existed for more than a dozen years and, probably, of course, belongs to the liberal view of the world, that today there is only one civilization on planet earth and its various representatives. well, that is, china and russia and india and africa yes, this is all one civilization, because they live according to the same principles in first of all, the economic world is becoming global and this is a civilization of consumption. do dear experts agree that there are no two, three or four civilizations, but there is one in which there are irreconcilable contradictions, but they are still within the framework of one civilizational system or not, well, usually this term of civilization was used , as opposed to the term barbarism in general civilization, as if it were a universal property of the transition from savagery to the civilized world to cities in

industry, so education, health care, and so on and so forth. but in general, today you mentioned. yes nelevsky there is also such samil huntington . osval, spender, indeed. there is such a theory that the world consists of many civilizations, at least with 9, let's say, and try to get off all this into one unite into one kind of whole. it seems to me that this is futile, because if you do not take into account the specifics of each people, each individual and unit in donetsk called it a cultural-historical type, then you simply do not understand? you will get a world of chaos, and we must understand each other. sorry that the rest of the un charter just unites all countries unites us, like humanity to humanity, as they said to marry nations. and you can't get away from this. it becomes more obvious with regard to russia and the west, you raised this topic, yes, look here, firstly, we missed the first world war, not only the second, it showed that we

can ally against a common enemy, but also the first world war when we were part of the entente and fought. with the same germans, secondly, when peter launched these western reforms in the 18th century, russia was saturated with western culture with western technologies, but the 19th century answered, this is the great golden age of russian culture, which enriched the whole world and it is no coincidence that the president today. that is, it is now raising questions about this soft power about advancing specifically towards cultural content. i think and you know, this aphorism, when they say the guns will be silent today, it needs to be reviewed, because if they talk, only guns, no one will not remain, and our muses must advance. so all the same one materialization or different. and i think that the concept of civilization should be considered in two broad senses in relation to time to epoch, and then we can talk about the modern

civilization of a single civilization and the second narrow sense, when we consider certain cultures in the context of regions in the context, this is cultural development and so on. we can agree that there are many of these civilizations, that is, the point of view on which we stand determines a lot. i am i agree with my colleague that even the events of the past. all the same, we must try to evaluate in such a way that there is some volume in the assimilation of this past of ours. and if we are talking about our cooperation with the west. i want to remind you that there is not a single western country where there are no westernizers and slavophiles. look at the 19th century discussion. with the germans, with the poles, not to mention the british or the united states, these two tendencies fought all the time there, isolationism and openness to the world and

contacts with other nations. if speak about the soviet stage, let's remember, and those production capacities of the economy that was created at the time of our industrialization were german or american engineers. entirely purchased from factories. the same magnitogorsk is, uh, this is the fruit of our cooperation, it seems, with the west with which we were in confrontation, that is, the concept of civilization, as it seems to me, is such a complex idea, and as a rule, they exploit it. this concept is for political purposes, based on the fact that it is pursued whether only economic justifications or respected by all in within the framework of the un human rights charter to say that different cultural codes can be globalized and unified, which is what they were trying to do. well, the same quarrel. yes, for the last

few decades, you know, this morning i was reading the dutch newspaper anar rossii, uh, where there was a discussion about canceling dostoevsky, uh, or still, uh, it’s necessary that the not quite russian culture of russians does not cancel it. similar to the discussion at the beginning. ah, right after the revolution. we have this aisle of modern. there's a discussion on the page x this newspaper has been running since june launched a famous writer buruma a talented writer who uh, and since then they have been debating whether russians are genetically guilty or not. and here, respectively. is it necessary to cancel the russians? as a result of today's tank, it is some kind of verbose. there, he eventually came to a conclusion. no, after all, yes, dostoevsky uses the construction of the ideology of the modern russian empire, but for this you need to read it in order to understand this very enemy and no one about the charter for some reason while he does not remember this discussion. you know

, for some reason, they really argue at the level of not even our years, but those thirties, and the genetic responsibility of an entire people of an entire culture, an entire civilization, there is no getting away from it. so, uh, whether it is chartered or not, it is chartered, but we must understand that this competition has been going on, er, for centuries, nowhere. it didn’t go away, and uh, when the september 7 parade was mentioned here, correctly for the forty-fifth year, then i want to remind you, remember, uh, the medal was in the west for the victory in the cold war when they destroyed their enemy. yes, and they believed that they defeated our civilization as such , you know what the date of the start of the cold war is. september forty-fifth year, this is to the question that for them it begins on the second of september. this is when they were still holding parades with us, for some reason we were with churchill’s fulton speech in the forty- sixth video report, and they have

no agreement as soon as they signed the agreement, the agreement is all. we immediately began to fight against the russians so your ideologies think the cultural code exists or not hmm i i think that there are different civilizations with different values, there are western civilizations with their own values, for example, saudi civilizations of equality with their values, there are russian russian civilizations with their values, they are all different, but the more. i have been living in russia for 20 years already and have been working, the topic is more convinced that russia really has its own special way, but there were attempts to fit into the western world and remember western values. e attempt of gorbachev's kingdom to him heavenly, remember his phrase common european home was an attempt was an attempt. remember medvedev from lisbon to vladivostok , but whatever one may say, but it seems to me, that's all, and a special path dominates, and if you paraphrase kipling

, the west is the west, and russia is russia and that's it, you know lately on such a documentary series called pawnshop stars. i'm talking about the american cultural code there in the complex next. he comes some boy or girl and brings some valuable family relic and says, look at this, please says, do you want to sell, yes sell. and how much do you want, well, there's 200 dollars. i want to take my wife to a restaurant, this thing has been in the family for centuries. well, or there for decades, and he parted with not very easily, because the americans. it is not in the cultural code, especially the past. there is a real future. summarize here , uh, there are different americans, it's hard to generalize, because there is no such thing as an average american . this is true? no, well, i still insist on the fact that especially now we will hook the century combine uh different documents different

organizations that create well our common civilization yes you know what's the problem with the documents. you know what's the problem with the laws that's been around lately, right? for some reason, no one did it at all. there are rules even let him say this today. the west has rules that the west itself sets, then it changes it anyway. so it's possible to go crazy, because you sit down to play checkers with a person. and after two moves, it turns out that you are playing chess, and then it turns out that in fact, these are cards, yes. or chapaev, yes, but you can. the point is that these are concepts? is there a humanitarian policy of russia abroad? well, actually, too, strikingly western value. there also a. it is written that i swam we are for freedom of opinion, we support this, yes, we support sovereignty, that is, western values, and even in your document, therefore it looks about western values ​​and something like that, especially this freedom of speech freedom of expression .

yes, we will talk about the lgbt community later, yes, and so on, but in terms of absolute tolerance, please, but i want you again, then to quote one of the respected presidents of western countries who believe that the cultural code is communism, fascism in one bottle. and that putin needs to be wiped off the face of the earth with this code, a little later i think about this that, in principle, there are certainly different civilizations with different cultural codes and in europe there are literally three roman catholic , anglo-german protestant and our slavic-russian orthodox we have different cultural code and from the moment russia became strong country, but all the time trying to catch up with the western cultural code, that is, the first attempt. uh, making us catholics was undertaken under ivan the terrible, when he answered the pope of rome’s application, called him a dog and refused, because russia is the heir of byzantium of the third rome and you know

westernism, westernism, because our westernism is today’s russian liberals. this is what russia must be, uh, destroyed in some sort of triumph of western protestant ideology. westernization of peter this is what western technology should serve to advance russian national interests. and if the western gun shoots well, you need to buy it and shoot from it at the swedes, the germans, and the british , like this one to the west. we need to take the best technology from the west to put them on the advancement of the russian world, as the heir of byzantium, they guessed. now, the phrase does not give us a sound. the third rome is not rome, e, the third, moscow and we are the third rome, we are the heirs of the orthodox version of the byzantine one, of course there is some common root from rome. yes, maybe it comes uh, and uh, from this and the matter of the christian civilization of the lord, you understand each other, the third rome is a

concept of absolutely religious speech. it doesn't matter about christianity. the division of orthodox catholics at that time in moscow was a firm belief that this was the only christian power, orthodox is the second, but the most important thing is what alexander is doing in ukraine today , this is the most terrible split vladimir vladimirovich is good about this in his programs , says the schism of the orthodox church that's where it went just yes, let's not, after all, it's not far from nuclear. in the meantime , you know the apocalypse can have a different attitude towards alexander decisive? i know people who adore know people who hate, but in this. generalization, which was inherent in him ah, well, we must recognize its strength in the seventy-eighth year. he said the following. well, if i am asked, on the contrary, whether

i want to offer my country as a model today's west as it is, i will have to answer frankly. no, your society. i could not i would recommend that as an ideal for transforming ours for that rich spiritual development that our country has already suffered in this century, western systems in its current spiritually depleted form do not seem tempting, even the listed features of your life lead to extreme chagrin. he just moved to america. i understand spiritual spirituality is being deported. the main thing is that it is spiritual. wait one more time. come on, we're out of service now. we are talking about his definition of spiritual exhaustion. west that is, he i had a presentiment, then even then there was no lgbt but society. yes, especially q+. something there, but then there were no attempts to legalize pedophilia, which is today, yes, then there was not a lot of things, but the notorious one, that is, was already outlined even in these

years, and he understood what tolerance could lead to? it’s good, but as the same dostoevsky people said, only then the people, when they have their own special god, expel everyone else without any regret. it may be drastic, but it doesn't work any other way, so here we are now. we are freeing ourselves from western idols, not gods, idols, with which many people have beaten since the nineties, the bow of alexander ii the great, the russian thinker is also an emigrant, also expelled alexander alexandrovich, in the seventy-eighth year he was expelled by his entire family. he said the same thing in his book. the west is about the same thing, so this is not the only russian who warned us that this western system would never suit us, the russian, being in the west, began to criticize. well not any, not any but at least these two great man left this distance. and

when i came to america at the age of 25 and saw how people really live in the united states a. then i got the opportunity to make a tv show in the genre of a diary. how do they live there? well, i tried to find everything that can be said to the then soviet person, but about how good it is. in america, but often i didn’t find it, so this is really the reality in which you face and and here is this soft power that painted the image of the same united states america and the western world. these are two big differences, as they say in odessa, that if you were there really, and you were there in america, that there was a bunch of american intellectuals, our intelligentsia, who adored russian spirituality, knew russian religious philosophy, american slavs. some of the best so far. unfortunately, uh, half the historian of sovietologists experts on our issues is an orthodox american who has become the greatest theologian of russian rule, because we

have potential allies, even in america. i i understand, but look, i'm still talking about us. vciom published these surveys, how our citizens assess the influence of western civilization. in our society, the first such question was held in 2000 . but in 22 years, the opinion has changed dramatically. you see, today 59% believe that the influence of the west is destructive for us, and in 2000 there were only 35 of them. what do you think is the reason? uh, naturally, i would have it, ah also said that it was influenced by the state's relationship to the west of the relationship, and the smeik to the west, who lived brainwashing, for example, yes, do n't, so for me, please don't say that. i still don't like journalists. here is a statement, but nonetheless. eh, i am very

sorry as a little person that, for example, over these 22 years more russians have visited the west and have not seen how they really live. uh, people in europe that such a democracy such a western culture happens. they couldn’t now, that this is just the result of being there. yes, because 70% of russians do not have a foreign passport. yes, nothing has changed dramatically in russia, i think it's the russians now they see all the excesses. tolerance shifts. this is a good thing, but it should be done in moderation, and they see it, because , well, and also because in these programs in other programs they talk about it very often and therefore they know what lgbt is and how it is this is already a tendency of the body of reality has already crossed

all boundaries. you understand? what's the problem? lgbt turns out it's yesterday's tolerance conservatives. it's already gone all this indeed, absolutely conservatives, because the culture of cancellation, yes, which replaced the tolerance of such a culture, cancellation, if you do not agree with generally accepted liberal opinions, then you are erased into powder. it doesn't matter who you are. you see, even cartoons draw like this, but now you know what the main trend is now? well , then you did not agree with me, or someone else was. this is a justification for pedophilia. let's look at the screen. let me tell you about jonas, jonas has a secret. he is his pedophile attract only girls aged 6 to 12 years. what is pedophilia and what it is not, like any other sexual orientation of pedophilia, it can have different characteristics, for example, it can be heterosexual, it can be

homosexual, bisexual, some pedophiles are only attracted to children, and others are not only pedophiles - it's just sexual preferences pre-adolescent children, according to modern pedophilia research, unchanging sexual orientation. just like , for example, heterosexuality. modern studies of god are in germany not in the usa but ah, they are ahead of everything in germany as well, but as far as culture is concerned, and excellent - yes. this is also one distortion and the audience knows, well, it must be said for the sake of justice that in russia there is still some kind of culture to exchange, but you understand, if you are against, let's say, and express yourself very harshly against apparition, as if you are a public person, you are exposed to such a culture canceled that the american culture of armenia is resting.