the presence or suspicion that they had nuclear weapons because korea north korea has always been on the american list. uh, these are the rogue countries that must be destroyed. yes, on this list, uh, there was cancer, which abandoned the nuclear weapons program, on this list was libya, which abandoned the nuclear weapons program. but north korea decided not to refuse. well, i think that this is the merit of not only north korea , but also the united states of america themselves, you see, there was a program that the americans proposed to north koreans, if they do not deal with nuclear weapons, my help with energy and help with food, and how such an agreement existed, until american geologists found out. how many uranium ores are in north korea, there are 26 million tons. uranium ore, from which you can get it, well, get a clean wound of 17.5 thousand tons, these are

huge deposits and the one who americans, as always, was afraid of greed, and they said, we will help you if you give all the uranium to us in north korea of course, she didn’t go for it, but she understood that with her refusal she will provoke certain aggressive steps on the part of the united states of america, they withdrew from the nuclear test ban treaty, which they entered there and started testing them in 2006, then developed their missile program, created thermonuclear warheads and demonstrated launches and achievements to the whole world its rocket industry. one of these launches took place on the territory of japan, which was just deciding the issue of purchasing expansion of purchases, and anti-missile systems such as tet or its they write english tx, that is, we flew the rocket, but the system did not work, that is, the koreans showed that yes, they have a rocket industry. and

despite the fact that trump tried to somehow stop it, he even sent three aircraft carriers. koreans. they still went their own way. they had two friendly states. this is china russia they understood that, if anything, they would help, but none of the anglo-saxon analysts imagined that the koreans would not stop at this, they took and created not just a rocket nuclear industry. they created a missile nuclear shield and not one. intelligence services of the western world. can't say. and how many missiles are in service? north korea only ballistic intergenital ballistic and are they on submarines? that is, they are now in ignorance, and kim jong-un, he made it clear that any aggression, guys, our falcons will fly to washington, here, and the launch of the last intercontinental ballistic missile that was launched into space. there, at 4,000 km, according to the

calculation, many many experts say that that washington is not enough. yes, a serious situation for the united states, first of all, because indeed they are not transparent about north korea. they cannot penetrate it with anything, including north korea is also a cybernetic superpower, because it is impossible to penetrate the north korean internet north korean hackers work very actively all over the world economic north korea is presented as well, here is an economic black hole, as a country of poverty, in fact, well, this is an exaggeration in north korea have undergone reforms, certain similar to soviet nep, that is, they expanded the possibility of using market relations. many are engaged in entrepreneurship . and finally, the fact that north korea with e. docked with russia with china provided support to its economy. she was not isolated economically. it has always been associated with friendly states. and china, in this sense, of course, gave north korea's korea a serious support. well, at least just at the level of

consumption, many workers in north korea went to earn money in other countries, that is, economically north korea is not in such a bad position simply because it has two two pillar nations. and also, because there are very low prices. to be honest, i have never seen such low prices anywhere. as in north korea, uh, i constantly accuse korea of ​​showing nuclear blackmail there, and so on and so forth, there is ukraine, which is now shelling a nuclear reactor. yes, the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, engaging in direct nuclear blackmail. this is nuclear blackmail ukrainian nuclear terrorism nuclear terrorism, then essentially it closes eyes or even support. like this. well, that's par for the course for americans. well, here i think that, by the way, they don’t need them to launch a rocket across the ocean there, okinawa is much closer, but they have rockets on this ocean too, don’t worry. i say that okina, here, in

fact, here it is korean missiles. quite to itself enough e. and in general, i, well, i understand very well, everyone understands perfectly well that the first thing the allies of the united states will burn with a blue flame will cause irreparable damage, and the image in the united states, which cannot protect its allies, turns out, which they also have a huge amount of funds at first, indeed north korea knows to everyone who has been there that it was generally difficult to defeat even before the moment when they had, and their own nuclear missiles , because there the defense system for a decade has been built in such a way that it is useless to even land there, because there you need to destroy and turn everything without exception, this is a scorched sheet countries such as russia united russia china is here side by side to do. it's just that no one would, well , still their sovereignty when the hope is slightly weakened by the soviet on the russian federation of course they are the advent of nuclear weapons. and they saved. well, they didn’t save it, but at least they strengthened it to a large extent, by the way,

a very important point. right now, we used to have u, we were friends with partners, so, uh, we couldn’t violate sanctions against north korea, but now is a very good time to resume those the widest ties are economic contacts. and another important point. here, maybe, you should n't pay so much attention to, uh, the labor resources of hmm central asia when we have excellent disciplined labor personnel who treat us very well, who for and i think a quarter, and the salaries of those who come to us from 3 days here will perform much more qualified work under the strict guidance of their party leaders. i already think there will be no non-ethnic clashes. nothing like this so, well, it is necessary. that from the side of north korea , such gestures are also really being taken in favor of cooperation with russia, and they are also quite understandable and should be met by a movement from

moscow. that they understand that they will receive an answer. i don't know what answer they are afraid of and north korea is demonstrating that this sovereignty is possible. perhaps even for a small country that is simply capable of protect, but the more russia continues anatoly kuzichev. alexey lysova. time will tell, and the representatives of canada and poland have prepared a draft resolution of the igt following the visit to the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, which they will have to present at a special meeting next week, of course. and this text was at the disposal of the agency. reuters very interesting details given the iaea condemns

russia's ongoing violent actions against nuclear power plants in ukraine including ongoing the presence of russian troops and rosatom personnel at the zaporozhye npp, thereby significantly increasing the risk of a nuclear accident. the mission calls on russia to immediately stop all activities at ukraine's nuclear facilities. yes , this is a draft. it turned out to be at the disposal of reuters journalists, so far, so far, no final documents have been signed. there the hell. it seems to me that one can judge what is there, what is planned there, i don’t know whether he will sign it, where he will correct his grosse, and so on. will accept it. well, in general, while vladimir vladimirovich i have, you know, the feeling that everything that we took for an orgasm turned out to be asthma, that is, everything that we thought that they were still there yes, of course, under great pressure, but still, top notch professionals. well , after all, what’s the matter with them, well, so to speak, well, yes , of such a level that even high- class professionals can afford to write such a thing, i don’t

know how professional they are and honestly i don’t quite understand what kind of resolution the report is already many presented to the council. that is, uh, accordingly, more and more, the iaea has no authority beyond this, that is, perhaps, perhaps, it means the resolution of the security councils, which it is preparing. yes, rich, well, we cannot prepare this resolution. here but i'm to what to what, but in any case, there are different opinions, different views. we have seen this report. we have seen that this report refuted all these tales and rumors that the ukrainian side spread. in particular, personally zelensky that everything there is crammed with russian military equipment. uh, moreover, look at the mgt at the security council. it means that i presented a photograph of all this military equipment, which is present there, two trucks of the ural games there. yes, even, as vladimir putin explained in vladivostok, that this is for

transporting the guards of the national guard and so on. that’s nothing more than that, that is, and after that an article was published by the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine , zaluzhny, who doesn’t give a damn about the fact that he writes magates demons there after that. here russia has turned zaporozhye into a military base. and there is an artillery mount in particular tornado. he even knows it, yes, he didn’t find the magats, you understand, and ukraine continues to lie. even after that, zelensky is already aware of this. report. yes, he still says in his evening address. look, she confirmed that russian military equipment is present there. without any doubt, you don't know there, uh, without explaining doubts, of course, to the ukrainian public, what kind of military equipment. there is present. e. mgt, confirmed that russia is not using this e, nuclear power plant as a military base, which we present? enough normal amount of protection, yes armed of course. today again there was a

sabotage against this attempt, the attempt did not decrease against, yes, this station, so it is clear that their presence there uh is explained, what uh, with what do i agree? this is true with the call of the iaea, uh, to equip the demilitarized zone . we all agree. yes, only we are ready to avoid all the time. uh, in my opinion, how many times have i asked this question, never from one of ours, including experts from michael, even look here, it's the same the most piercing in his sincerity t-shirt i ask him a question, i say, listen, but well. well, yes, the report is still fifty-two, it is 55 pages and so on. so who is shooting? who is firing? you see, yura well, as in tomka, and they replied that there was ballistics there. well, at least in this report no one will notice something of his lines, oil was to be expected. and how do you feel about ukraine shelling, well, the draft resolution. look shelling this result. this is the consequences of

what a of what one side of the conflict we know. uh, how to finish russia on which side, and during an active military conflict and the mmt you always talk about a nuclear power plant, only i asked again. what's going on lord god, my engineers. i didn't try to control anything. well, well controls from well, yes. and what is the reason to shoot? that is, you think, yes, well, enough. this is the first reason that this is the result, look. that's the thousandth time. yes. well, well, i just don’t represent the iaea again and we are all of us all are here with you in this sense, we have a consensus with full expert a and journalistic, we confirm that, of course, it is shelling the nuclear power plant. it 's a little suicidal. wildly monstrous and so on. dangerous, everyone agrees, everyone agrees. okay, so uh. well, michaela tells us, it's do you understand what's the matter? well, in the same place you control it, yes, therefore they are forced to fire at it. that is, you

admit some damage. the logic of many of these is very simple and my logic is also simple. so let's uh share the same logic what if this station was absolutely demonstrated by no one firing at each other. so he is wealthy from the very beginning, and they called on everyone to introduce this zone without these relations, you say that i am also for it, but if the situation as it is now russia really controls this situation, yes, russia controls it does not hold any heavy weapons, only the protection of the station itself. please tell me you justify, knowing all these facts, the shelling of the nuclear and beauty. i understand that she is being fired upon, that this is a derivative of what i understand 5, since you are her shoots something. well, i guess i don't know, because i'm not there, i guess not russia

does not pronounce. well, at least you crack well done, the whole t-shirt well done, you are just like you, just like expert mte. yes? yes, well, the gist of the mgt proposal is to, again, run a security zone at this station. and actually it means lead blue. where is caste from? that is, not not ukraine , the dream should, uh, not russia, that is, precisely the security zone. in this sense, the blue helmets of this are now something incredible. the un is holding 12 activity. right now, 12 peacekeeping missions around the world are enough uh, well, uh-huh and a in kashmir and ignaqi in history. sta, why not add this mission? it seems to me that it

is two iaea observers to completely dismantle this station and lead this exit between russia, i understand you and then no one will have any paint. yes. what got you so upset? yes or no? the new light bulb is not ukraine, not russia, oh, but attention by whom who who wanted to build two more million-plus power units there? who who wanted control all eight power units? who wants to make money on them? are the americans? this is it, is it? how to understand this is under control? we are here in this studio and what? it 's not that there was someone's cry, so to speak,

emotional we are just downright instrumental. well, they showed, unfortunately with great bitterness, that in fact both the un and the secretary general, he is in fact american or, in extreme cases, pro-american officials of such personnel. that's how on this sanction these characters. she is also a maintenance worker. unfortunately, in many ways. this is so, of course, a simplification, of course, of course, but nevertheless fair and many, supposedly. you know? why? for example , kolokoltsev, our minister of the interior, did not arrive at the un meeting where there are 200 members, and so on. do you know why? yes , please, friends, here you need to understand what this is, firstly, a publication. this is a post that, in my opinion, aims to just try. delete the previous motote countdown, because there really are no draft resolutions of the iaea can't cook. well, yes, that's where the story is told. uh, the draft was prepared by two members of this commission, the

participants are the poles and canadians, and the question is. in this case, it is prepared for whom, that is, who will throw this resolution, and most likely it will be either more, or canada has prepared a resolution, or something, a meeting, most likely, one of these countries will put this resolution to a vote, which was prepared by the members of this very commission, but this does not mean that it prepared everything rich. and what is the iaea under these good move in what sense good? here they are throwing in an absolutely ridiculous and monstrous idiotic resolution, yes, of course they block it. well , for example, russia and of course, then all the headlines of all all the media looked the same. russia blocked the resolution of the magotep and the situation on zaporizhzhya is perfectly to blame, that it is so beautiful, but uh, there is a second point, of

course , which michael will be able to answer the event. against the background of the fact that even this morning another ukrainian sabotage reconnaissance group tried to land. you and i are fine, we understand that as soon as there is an empty earth-training station on the territory, at least one sabotage group is in force, then the question of who controls the station has already been resolved, because , of course, no one will storm the station any further, because it is nuclear facility, therefore, a huge jackpot in the form of victory, that is, the return of the station under ukrainian control. in this case he is zelensky hang continuously in front of his mortgaged. and so, if continuous attempts go there somehow. still, to get in. of course, in this case, with a call to demilitarize the station, remove even the station’s guards from it. of course, in this case they coincide very well and this disgrace is king. it is necessary to stop, of course, correctly, when he said about dismantling. well, i haven’t finished

just withdrawing ukrainian troops for 300 km, and everything will be here. this is the demilitarization of the un. i want to remind you of the war in korea, it was a peacekeeping the un mission so that you do not forget, that is, how it ended, what does it mean in our studio here in russia, an american is telling what we need to do on both sides michael not you, you will tell us. what to do? mind your own business, the americans i have answers. you say not to tell you. no, i mean, exclusively exclusively yours, so to speak. eh, how to say? yes , only that intonation with which you tell us only how to do it, but in principle. well, in principle, after all, those who american intonation, in principle, everyone in this studio, of course, has an equal right to speak. here i affirm this and even on my intonation, as if it were us. well, come on, come on, you have to decide. i ask you colleagues, your

evasiveness is embarrassing, because the question who is shelling the station who said this? who is evasiveness? i said, i'm guessing it's still shelling. i'm not shaking everything there, well, bote's heads are being shelled. i am no longer russia, not russia, but. who is probably the only ukrainian side. thank you, really just fuf is a really honest person. this is what you need. ask we will also go to you, by the way, with a question. well, perhaps michael, for the first time in i don’t know how many weeks, said the word clearly, we all, we wrote it all down. yes thanks. and if you know, and here's how you look, here, yes, here, the truth looks like it's very thoughtful and very good. in fact, step into throwing this resolution is completely ridiculous, everyone understands this. yes, then uh, means block it with russia of course, she will unblock it, and then arrange dances around this with a tambourine, to

look yes, the iaea resolution high-class professionals, the relative situation is on proshko. i blocked everything in kings at once, at least two members, rich, really biased people absolutely. yes, poles as an analysis says something, but now not everything. we don’t see everything, the report of the resolution committee was preparing a pole and more. therefore, we see that there are still people, indeed. there are honest professionals in this mission, so part of our hopes were not in vain. she still has people oily. yes, that part was not in vain, after all, you know that, uh, you must always teach the source for the first time in any, so to speak, incomprehensible situation. that's how i think. uh, well, it’s true, we really do have vladimirovich’s rules and we have the report itself, there is the iaea report there, let’s study it carefully. he, too, so to speak, is not indisputable in many aspects, but still it is a document. and this is a provocation, you know how, so to speak, to distinguish one from the other. if the

ellipsis was given, now we will find out what follows it, how to avoid the end of ukraine was told by nato secretary general jens stoltenberg at a meeting with us secretary of state anthony blinkin. if russia stops the war , there will be peace, if ukraine stops fighting, then it will cease to exist, so we will continue to stick to our course for the sake of saving ukraine and our own nato is deploying new forces on the eastern border and sending a clear signal to the russian federation that everyone will protect an inch of your territory? and ukraine is that nato or what? somehow understand something in general or what? this is a typical bipolar. nato understand, especially for every inch of territory ukraine must stand. well, in the sense of a signal. i don’t understand how they generally, how they perceive, how

they perceive ukraine or who they are. just translate to me, please, he said, he says, ukraine will not resist if it does. she will cease to exist. soap on the forehead. if we meet with russia, we are terribly worried, therefore we are strengthening the defense of the nato countries, he said everything, that is, in fact, this is an assumption. uh in ambulance termination the existence of ukraine, the protection of ukraine in general, we are not talking about the protection of the zone between russia and nato, all this. well, how could this message also be used since they are so scared, it means that they will bring money and weapons and the ukrainians will take their hands, and we will fight, but at the same time, uh. some kind of romantic dream that this arrestultenberg is very worried about how many people will die in kiev or in other regions and cities of ukraine is absolutely not necessary. you just need to

understand all their cynicism to use them with less cynicism. and i think that even zelensky has already understood this, and if possible, use their cynicism and use them even cynically, as they do it right. i understand you are the buffer zone time. yes, not zelensky personally, you understand? what difference does it make to them zelenskaya would be a surname, not zelensky but an experienced politician. just don't get into this situation. she wouldn't be the way she is now, she wasn't. it would be a good surveyed use if a gag or they here, you know about the last use they use not to regret, not not to nourish, no one nourishes illusions. alive, as heard this statement, yes. e not a single inch in its territory and another very interesting passage must be remembered, if russia stops the war there will be peace, if ukraine stops hostilities. this is not good for us. we

will continue with weapons and so on, the message is obvious. i will paraphrase a bit of stoltenberg in order to make it clear to our audience that there is nowhere to retreat behind brussels, something like this, and the line as a whole. yes, i understood, volodya said well, and the border, naturally, of the brussels region now runs along the line of contact, and, uh, what he is talking about, stoltenberg. uh, that it is impossible to weaken assistance to ukraine now that it is impossible to stop, it is necessary to continue to help further and further, as long as there is strength, and despite the cold, despite economic problems, but guys. uh, understand, if ukraine does not, then russian tanks will rush now to your cities now such a pumping of information, yes, well, then it will only be such a tool. listen now here at once show. look, volodya is still very precise, in my opinion, she said very well. yes, border, e

brussels region. here we are passing through. our task is to move the border of the brussels region here, their task. this means pushing the brussels region here, absolutely, absolutely, so to speak. thank you for this image us goal. tell a direct encounter with this bruce not before brussels did not good triple while she was in the garbage zone of ukraine gave, until you ran into them directly. wait tolstoy and says that we will now go to the border poland and then you don't have to go to the border at all, you have to stop and start diplomatically. why? why because then it will be the third world war in full growth? there will be a direct conflict, that is, wait for

ukraine to fall. well, i hypothetically say that if you have long-term plans, they will not be realized, but if you want before that, then they will still use their fifth article, then this will lead to a conflict in moscow. poland countries invaded. i don't feel if we if we suppose hypothetically well, wait wait if we come close. give us a map of europe , please, friends, a map of europe. give us, please, wait, wait, maybe, maybe , according to your logic, the very fact that we are on the border from nato is a reason to exclude the fifth article. look, i draw your attention to several nato countries with which we are already quite successfully bordering . it's completely different history, that is. they are afraid of this fear generates

different stories. and then this is really what washington is trying to avoid at the expense of ukrainian lives to avoid a direct conflict with moscow. that will already be, as far as washington’s attention to ukrainian lives is concerned, it’s very well done, he said, let’s listen to one figure called. he is mark minley general. we are listening about washington's fears and ukrainian lives. over the past six months, the ukrainians have paid a terrible price of thousands and tens of thousands of casualties, killed and wounded. first, the us russian operation supplied kiev with almost half a million 155 mm caliber shells, 16 rocket launchers highmars with thousands of glrs shells. washington handed over to kiev m-77,000 howitzers, anti-tank weapons, thousands of anti-aircraft weapons, harm missiles, as well as small arms. ukraine is well equipped with all the systems necessary for its defense. you feel

yes, how amazing it is. uh, there's the current logic of mark miles, he's talking about people. uh, it feels like he's talking, just paid a terrible price with tens of thousands of casualties in dead and wounded. yes, therefore, we continue to supply weapons, in particular, they are starting to list the m77. well, to millimeters and so on and so on and so on, but he is in my mind. most importantly, what is to me is that he says that we will continue to deliver to these most terrible losses of the terrible. we really sympathize with you as much as possible, right? how else to understand his words? yes, absolutely understand it. and you know i liked it. you are a lovik if scattering will automatically come out on the border of poland. the fifth article of nato according to this logic, in theory, since finland is accepted into nato, then we should automatically use the battery yes. this is an attack on the csto and, accordingly, logically. yes, well, just like that, well, the border is approaching, but it just

suited us that way, ukraine while it was a buffer zone, but that's the point, when it began to join nato and nato decided to master this buffer zone. here i had to use a special operation about words, stoltenberg. you know, he answered smartly today on the pages of the war show times, from the famous american economist jeffreysaks. he read the same article with confusion on the same one. we think yesterday, yes, and he answered, he says, listen, you are nato americans. you again make afghanistan out of ukraine for you any liberation of the country, there and korea is mentioned this destruction of this country. you see, now you are turning from ukraine. that's it, afghanistan the only way. it is he, the famous economist, who explains the general secretary to save the situation, to save, including including ukraine is to return to the march agreements preliminary to the attempt.