this is an attack on the csto. and accordingly, well , well, well, the border is approaching, but it just suited us, ukraine while it was a buffer zone, but that's the point, when it began to join nato and nato decided this buffer zone master. here i had to use a special operation about words, stoltenberg. you know, he was chicly answered today on the pages of financial. times famous american economist jeffrey sachs. he read an article by the same stoltenberg in the same times. yesterday. yes, and he answered. listen, you are nato americans. you again make afghanistan out of ukraine for you any liberation of the country, there and korea this destruction of this country is mentioned. you see, now you are turning from ukraine. that's it, afghanistan the only way. it is he, the famous economist, who explains to the nato secretary general to save the situation, to save ukraine, including ukraine, is to return to the march agreements preliminary to an attempt. well, yes,

ukraine is not an expansion of nato and that's it. and by the way, do you remember, listen now about it already even hard to believe him. and remember zelensky's statement, zelensky said in march. you know, we thought so, it really was a stupid idea. nato city fig. you don't want us anymore and so on friends. this is the same zelensky spoke in march. we thought everything, this is a really bad idea, we decided to abandon it and so on, then someone became his sharply honed bayonet. uh, it means to poke in the back, if well, i don’t know where, but where to poke there? yes, the rhetoric has changed and suddenly he is already in such a course, which means that the chest is a wheel, we are everything else, yes, we are not five. that's right, like stoltenberg is not five, native land, etc. well, you see, yes, what is it? it's not zelensky who is talking about, in fact, to the question of , which means, on his own, not on his own. this is not zelensky saying, in general, what he says, ukraine does not take anything for you to go. uh, the secrets of the discovery, people much smarter and more experienced than zelensky said that, in general, they

were theoretically byda, but they were not technically ready. and i need to figure out ukraine as a european fork. to the soviet outlet. need to refurbish never. look, it's very impossible. firstly, they have already started it, they have already begun to really strictly speaking, to master the technical military sense and so on. then remember, listen to crimea, i will never forget this scene , a magnificent favorite great scene, which will be included in all history books, crimea for a thousand years, do not lie to you. what is the fifth sixth? yes, when it means, when they tried there, uh, pathetic paphos , he remembers nato ships to appear like that, the crimeans kicked them out to arrive in crimea with these very ones, which means what people call it wet rags. yes? e expelled. listen to all this. this is absolutely not a random event of body movement. well, you understand this. they want to use, not defend,

these are different options . and if you have already accepted the composition, everything is protected by bureaucratic nonsense, it is nonsense, if this territory is used. this is according to the documents, let it be called whatever you like. there is the wildest neutrality. it doesn't matter what it's called. it is important that actually happening is an important fact, and the fact of mastering it is on the face and you are fine. you know, moreover, zelensky’s endless words that mr. stoltenberg, remember, repeatedly appealed to us with such a legal status? why is ukraine still not vnata? and because it was already known in advance how nato would use the same ukraine and all the roles were painted long before please, we are using the word buffer incorrectly, because, well, maybe the tragedy of the ukrainian people is that their the leadership allowed it out of the buffer, which i think is even nice for the ukrainians. use it as a bumper, that

is, accelerate and beat about russia, yes, and not counting it, and they themselves didn’t. you yourself didn’t want to be a buffer. you are right them. yes, it is interesting that, of course, i agree that those words of russian politicians who say that we will now approach the border. uh, so to speak in poland and let's look further. these words, of course, are superfluous, because we announced the goals of the war in february. and there are no warsaw berlin neighborhoods of brussels, and therefore, let's still not use this historian, it is harmful and a very important thing for accuracy. and the fact that, so to speak, as in images of expression. uh, vladimir viktorovich means, uh, both, what is it called, the borders of the brussels region are coming closer to ours, you know, the task is to move the borders of the brussels region as far as possible from our borders? well, what is there? well, this is true today there was a meeting of the head of the duma factions, in which i also took part and representatives of the state duma volodya on vyacheslav from e.

one of the three main people. uh, in the chinese manual. this is, janshu. this is the head. all chinese people's congress is our parliament, and he spoke frankly. and what is important, here we are used to europe and europe the world is huge. and actually their comrade chairman. so he said that we see that russia supports us and our political leadership appreciates the fact that your political leadership supports china on the issue of taiwan and we support you on the issue of ukraine for the first time announced publicly. here. well, yes, for the first time in a third person. and we see that, that is, the leadership, yes, the united states and nato began to surround russia, began to bring their uh, military machine closer to its borders. and you had no other choice. it seems to me like

this. well, yes, exactly discreet very carefully is such a new assessment. well, yes, therefore, the world does not end with europe no, it does not swing. listen. it is very good that you quoted this to us, yes, as if china sees it. and it can be said that this is not a specific person. this is a representative leadership, chinese china and how nato is moving towards the east while expanding, so at the same time the united states in the pacific region also puts pressure on eurasia from both sides, compressing space. the task, including digimonization, is beautiful. eh, right here, by the way, you need to remember these words of the word, there are stoltenberg and miles. yes. uh, well, first of all , once again it means that if russia comes out, it means to some kind of border there. uh, then yes, then nato will, which means, what is the name of, uh, will include the fifth article. here. pay attention again means if nato

feel threatened in some way. it will include the fifth article and will defend itself with its own, and so on. if russia felt to feel some kind of threat, russia felt it in the twenty-first year, and about which in december it was absolutely unambiguously stated. any threat, then that's your problem. you yourself are fools. we don't threaten anyone. here you feel amazing logic, they will feel threatened. they are required to include the fifth article. and if you feel threatened, well, you are morons, well, guys, that's it. called. this is the modern world. he looks like this, please. well, uh, here. of course, you need to understand that nato is always trying to create such a kind of gasket for itself, that is, these dances on the border with tambourines. it's always me this statement that they'll invoke the fifth amendment if they need to. well, the last 20 years. i definitely hear it there with regularity once or twice a year, as soon as russia begins to move at least somewhere. i remember how even this was stated when they were with the situation with georgia, when there were hostilities with georgia, there was also it is said that if russia suddenly does not confine itself to defensive actions. and in general, at least somehow

somewhere else somewhere on the fifth amendment. it's just that the fifth article was activated tomorrow for him. this is the fifth article of september. yes, she was absolutely right. in afghanistan although, of course, she was also attracted there, just how you can attract an owl, lord, you understand, because afghanistan threatened and attacked nato exactly to the extent that an owl and the globe can be, nevertheless, in general. uh, here's watching here all this is such a rapidly internationalization of the conflict, in which, all the time, everything that is possible with nato is sliding there, sliding down. mercenaries are sliding down and how to say and expert advisers anything and really, as our president ukraine practically said. now the full military control of nato and the usa has passed under military control, in this case, for example, no matter how no

one bothers us to act. eh, in the same way. here , just now, there was a beautiful statement of korea, you understand korea who say they support you understand russia, no one bothers us there. even north korea, which was declaring a fight against the united states - you know, no one is stopping us from taking a measure and creating an international corps of people in the world who hate the united states and, accordingly, all their satellites, their huge number. and if even in this corps, for example, it is allowed to allow the use of testing any weapons in this corps. so korea will send two two divisions of its militias along with all its weapons, because they will work out what they are in a few years will fight against the us in south korea for them. it's not only an honor, but also just a practical benefit. so what's the prognosis, even if we can make the opportunity for us to react a huge amount. well, we just behave a little differently than they do, although, i'll be honest.

you know what they say, if i was a director, i would act like this, you understand? yes , we suggested this. yes, fives, only e can be activated during a specific act of aggression against one nato member, and the approach or did afghanistan attack the us after all? no, it's not, it's not nato, how is it not necessary? no, this is the result of september 11, of course, when the fifth article was activated, of course, this is therefore an approximation - this is not this is not the right reason. just an approximation. yes, what yes, yes? and hmm, that's exactly what it is. the main thing is the reason. why there will be no act of aggression against the date, understand will not tempt fate as regards the statement became imperial. so you are on that basis. you are very much a question of what kind of motherfucker? what the fuck

should i quote ukraine? we continue to work live a terrible word. the truth from michael boom is on the way. well, i just want it to sound, so to speak, to be more convex. i have no doubt that it will be remembered as such? yes, as stoltenberg said there. he said he should place blah blah blah blah a clear signal that he will protect every inch of his territory, listen to the other person, he is called lloyd austin loydity. he is the secretary of defense for the united states of america, and now he is finally clearing things up. listen. i want to be clear nato does not seek to conflict with russia and does not pose any threat to it, but our defensive alliance, as always will protect every inch of nato territory, we will continue to oppose russia's offensive against democracy sovereignty and the rules-based

world order manual one, in fact, the recognition that the united states is using ukraine harshly is used yes, but a training manual. fire, even at the level of images every day of our territory, not a step, tra-ta-ta and so on, the effect of the word is true, sorry, yes to to this, yes, that is, on the basis of tottenberg's statement, what will he listen to? yes, but no. he is the general secretary. nato yes, the question to me is that why the hell does nato operate, and to some extent on the territory of ukraine to retell, that is, what kind? no, you added it. i took on what basis, if ukraine does not need anything, and i can e ask the same question a counter question. on what basis is russia operating on the territory of syria syria is not a member of the accident on the basis of the authorities of the

elected authorities of syria my dearest uh-huh the authorities of ukraine, moreover, in the front, for which 73% voted, so if now 91% agree no , it’s good for you, because it’s michael who argues, i really at least once doubted to say so, i just said that russia is like a. a sovereign capable country has the right to say so, uh, to be aware of some threat to itself and to stop these threats, no matter how you deal with it, how you don’t feel about it, stop the threat that you need for yourself. i think everything says, the verkhovna rada argues with this. she did not give consent to the deployment of troops nato on the ukrainian territory, it turns out different on the territory of ukraine and they were never built,

that is, i built the training bases. i’m there, in contrast to the word of the lord, of course, they brought firewood and a new beautiful one to us on the air. i remember the british flag. but all this powerful preparation of all power is necessary, so to speak, the defense of ukraine is over. we won't give me a third of nato's land there, in general , a story about ukraine, there is no story about ukraine . there is a story about mata about our interests, we will give ukraine weapons and money. and they let us protect. it's so kind of them. they are so powerful beautiful ukraine must protect them. why a i do not yes, you can so author's digression. excuse me, it's so nice of you that you chose the colors of the russian tricolor today, just the sequences of the very french tricolor. in general, our flags are blue and white. we support dynamo kyiv as always. so, unexpectedly, an unexpected twist in our program is the heart of the

russian tricolor. and you have to edit. uh, of course, the presence of a third country to call it, of course, it is possible, but there is a little more agreement, about which this django liberated oh, he, in principle, as it were, mentions to invite to his territory. nato given that nato and russia may have a nuclear war. this is in some degree of madness, because those who are invited there perfectly understand. this is when we were invited to syria, we were dealing with a terrorist organization against which we fought together with you. that is, we were allies to some extent. but they think that this is a similar situation in ukraine, you know, if i notice terrorists, you are also fighting in syria , while we very clearly divided heaven and earth with you, so that god forbid, even on an allied basis, we would not cross anywhere. yes, imagine that you enter the territory of ukraine as nato invited by ukraine and there as a result. uh, you don't

run into russia in any way. but you already know this from the bipolar section. here's the second one, of course. it's quite obvious that all these statements are only for one thing. i repeat attempts at all costs to keep russia from any other answers, that is, it is necessary to guarantee russia that we we definitely won’t go there to stuff everything we need to fight from russia with the help of poor ukrainian units, because we don’t feel sorry for the units, there are a lot of them here and they’re not completely right. well, of course we will. it's a pity, yes, in the family, but a lot to you, but you give me shells from the calibers beloved by michael and further let what is called exercise, that is. well, here we are sorry, but the americans do not feel sorry for anyone at all. they only fight for their own interests. here they are at home. yes, it’s amazing where america is where europe is in general, but america wants to be present everywhere its tentacles. cancer just disbanded and everything amazes and poisons, just

some kind of poisonous story comes from america, so yesterday the cia director or dead said that the united states would continue to publish intelligence of the russian operation. here's how it was all argued. when president biden made the decision to release some of our intelligence that played an important role during the last six months of the war in ukraine, this practice will continue, but this should be the exception, not the rules. to avoid an irresponsible approach to the dissemination of information collected by the intelligence services. here, of course, an explanation is needed, because you seem to know a lot, but sometimes it happens that you cram a lot of important words into one line, and each of them is important. but in general. here, the meaning of what was said, vladimir ivanovich, is eluding me, explain to me, he means to me that these are the very warnings that russia is about to attack ukraine, you remember, then the president published these data. uh, and why ukraine than how ukraine

took advantage of this. well, kuleba took his dogs out. eh, at the same time calming the population, so that god forbid, they do not create traffic jams in order to take out the dogs. and when they mentioned the manual about an inch here. nato you remember for us something these are familiar combinations. inch of nato territory yes, you remember how in the eighties everyone told us to swear. it is with this phrase that we do not hope, i hate. that's not how it expands. that's not an inch widen in the east. they are all now, as they now say, but there are no documents. and now they territory and say, but now not an inch. we will not let you enter there, you must enter the territory that we promised you would be a buffer, thereby absolutely fair. i don’t understand this , i’ll plant it, saying that this practice will continue, it tells us it’s taken, then it will continue well, that is, e, so to speak, e ukraine will provide divorced information of all kinds. for me too, really. i am a naive person, not a military man. i don't understand

that if there is such information, which is very, er, so to speak, well, critically important for for for that country now why don't we stop this threat? i know that americans believe that if someone is a sputnik, then everything is everything , everything is nothing, nothing is everything according to zoom, lord, they itch, they buzz. and that's where it all ends. yes, but then he says that it is necessary not to avoid. er, this should be the exception, not the rule. what is in general? what are we talking about, that, of course, the cia's capabilities are very large, but not unlimited, and they are well aware that many elements of critical information, as it were, should be shared with allies, they can end up very badly for the sources, because to determine after all what where and how is it always? clearly, of course, in this case it is easy. let me remind you that even at the very beginning of the conflict, then there was even a shouting and pulling on the part of the special services of journalists, that it’s enough to say that we are transmitting divorced information to ukraine, that you are making such

statements, and then we are called pulling intelligence officers out of prison, understand? and of course, in this case there is a hint that we will to share information on exactly the one that, as it were, would not somehow harm our sources , provided that this information is made public. it’s not just a word of publicizing the use, it is almost automatically detected, because it’s clear that intelligence information can be kept in a circle where it is, well, a maximum of three checks and you also can’t be sure when you transfer information from the americans to the allies, by the way , in the special services. there is even a very clear threshold for allowing the secrecy of information transfer among their own. that is, even friendly us intelligence agencies are only given information that is, as it were, considered and in a certain stamp. apparently it is necessary for friends that even with a leak, there will be no great harm. understood, please. right now, michael is the one you

perform the most. listen, second block in a row. i have such welling up, redeeming a man's tear. perhaps you can even see why, because there is such a remembrance of the endless red lines that once existed now. they already erased. moved. here, even the eighties remembered how it was then that nato suddenly joined the warsaw bloc in the north atlantic alliance, how could this be impossible, and what worries me? uh, in connection with this endless movement of red lines. that this process is practically, we won’t stop it now, that is, all the time someone is trying to draw this line there, burnsley or miles or someone else, we will not allow it in any case, and then this line is pushed back every time. was it possible to imagine, for example, six months ago that the americans would openly say that, and they are ready to supply ukraine with missiles that are capable of striking the territory of the russian federation

; actions are only defensive, and then further and further this is kras. we are already moving back, i don’t know, centimeters from a direct collision. and this will not seem like a fantasy, alas, today with the military of the north atlantic alliance yes, they are fighting there. well, as long as they are still being taught, how are they either volunteers or institutions? like a proxy, as it were, it doesn’t seem like a fantasy, and it’s disturbing that now is the time for the red lines, and we are already overcoming them not with checkers, as it was, there back in the eighties and nineties, and already with huge jumps already. we are downloading, rushing towards each other , and now i have, so to speak, a redeeming man's e. ok then. yes, they keep pushing back the escalation. so to speak, increases

the tension is general, so to speak, higher and higher and higher and higher, this already seems to be the norm. and well, at least we are used to it so to speak. and what is your conclusion and then? we are already talking about a full-scale war, which i would very much not want to allow. for the time being, they don’t talk about it, as about some, but inevitability, but i think soon such conversations will go. you still we agree that here is a full-scale war. god forbid, god forbid that it is really likely. and what do you think, uh, purely logically without emotionless coloring. and which brings this biggest war closer, so to speak, if we consider it the most terrible threat to humanity, then it would probably be much more responsible not to supply weapons to ukraine , i repeat, if we consider the prospect of a big war, there is nowhere for the most terrible to retreat, because behind brussels that is, not that is not for everyone. it seems that the prospects are so terribly scary,

because these people are not idiots and supplying weapons in such volumes and on the report on the supply of more and more and more. they understand what the line they are at what line they bring humanity closer. i understand correctly, among the people, this is what villas are called. well, that is not here. there is no good way, uh, and uh, we haven't reached the point yet , when everyone's bridges have already been burned, but very close to it, it's clear here we are, uh, we said we remembered. yes, there are the eighties and nineties, when we took our word for it, yes, that nato will not expand there, and so on. but it became interesting. if there was a document, if at that time there would be an official agreement an assurance from nato that yes indeed we will not move forward. i understand that history does not like subjunctive moods, in general history is the most excellent teacher who has the worst students, but nonetheless. yes, if this document existed, how would they react to it today. all kinds of international institutions , organizations, yes, for example, there in the

united nations would they somehow take note of it for consideration or not? or would you just say it's nothing, because, basically, he today it is very, and already in my opinion, dubious, it is becoming an organization that has discredited itself and it already says in itself that it needs to be reformed in some way. naturally in one direction. we understand that what the united nations permanent representative from the united states linda thomas greenfield jay announced during the general assembly this month, president joe biden, secretary of state anthony blinkin and i plan to hold broad consultations on the reform of the security council and other bodies, the security council needs to better reflect those global the realities that exist today it is about changing the rules for issuing a veto, according to which the permanent members will explain to their general ensemble. russia violated national sovereignty and territorial integrity, violated human rights and unleashed an open war instead of negotiating

peace, as i even said today. come on, me too. i will repeat again. yes, if anyone said it, in general, anyone, but when the states say it, of course, but here's the second stingy men's, of course, welling up. but this is the third one already. yes, this is the wildest comical, of course, performance, but, but it probably has some kind of idea and consequences. well, it’s been arguing for a long time that and famirov, he doesn’t reflect his, e, today’s reality, because in the forty-fifth year, when one time was enough now in a different alignment e of forces, but i’m afraid that and if really , and the general assemblies will be more involved in not only the security council because it will play a cruel joke on the united states because that, well, as we have already said a lot of enemies of the us and either undecided or not joining remember the movement is not an

affiliation. yes, not joining how many, but not joining, so it seems to me that she is just tempting fate if the general assemblies are more involved, because this will not seem enough. uh, united by the state itself. i mean the vote is good, so you see such and such. sterilism yes, because for a long time thomas here proposes reforming, i don’t mean that it, of course, will allow there, so to speak, the united states is much more, well, i don’t know, they put on much more tools in order to put pressure on russia microso. he rightly says no. maybe everything, on the contrary, will actually turn out to be a democracy, which does not mean that democracy was held last year, but this will also only affect those who participate in this summit, but he still exists, and he has claims that that this is still an international structure, which is a united organization, but you don't give a damn.

it is necessary to spit this democracy. actually. everyone is the same about you, the question is, what would happen if you suddenly found such a document, if i'm not mistaken, you had such a document six months ago, it was not found, of course. e agreement, but it was, as far as i understand, diplomatic correspondence within the framework of which , if i’m not mistaken, gorbachev made promises on paper that, in no case, would pose a threat to move. to the east on this occasion it was said it was said that it does not play. they never really said. you tell them to say, they said document, no more corresponds to our ideas about our security. goodbye. now i would like to develop one more topic. yes, there really is a slip. here is the shift of the red lines. this is such one process, one trend is moving towards the second trend. you see, europe, for example, yes, it is not only

rather irresponsible political ones. here you go, doers. yes, there are some more and several such layers of support, for example, there is a network of old aristocratic families, and that’s it, i really don’t like there is a network, for example, the catholic church. yes, based on the jesuits there. these are deep ones, there are deep ones. in fact , europe and she really doesn’t like everything that’s happening, so once, the more lines shift, the more this second part of europe begins to resist and we see by indirect signs we see how the demography is there yes, such a sociology, to be more precise, as she starts to move. there is less and less support for all this and the ukrainian theme, less support for ukraine, and more and more such historical voice support , funding is not becoming less - this is money and this media. yes, i say in the people in the voters it is clear that all this is not to their liking. people are poorer, that is, there is a second, that awning on the face. it is there, but there are cracks. trend. it inspires some kind of hope, so no. this, of course, inspires

hope and it is clear that there is, firstly. you say there are layers that we don't like, apparently for strategic reasons. yes yes there are people who don't like it for reasons, what the hell. i must now have plus 15 in the apartment, a little those people who say it is necessary vasya is necessary. there are people who are starting to squint more and more in the countries of europe. i understand that it's just a little bit of a process . well, as always in europe and so to speak. its flagship is not estonia, everything is a little bit, as if everything is a little slow, as if it is clear that all this counter is a trend, but they are not comparable in speed. unfortunately, although the closer winter is, so to speak, these speeds are better aligned. i think so. it became known that the european union imposes strict restrictions on tourist visas for russian citizens, and here's how this was argued by the european commissioner for the home affairs of the euro.