e you distorted his quote a little. i want to explain what he meant when he spoke of de -imperialization or de-colonization. he did not say the destruction of russia, he talked about what needs to be saved. uh, we need to rid russia of the imperial e- colonial thinking. here i have a simple question. and what is his dog business? yes why does he climb into the inner desire of the russian federation threatens european security, that they threaten to fight, that thereby escape the american, and security, because any any expansion of this conflict started on nato - you know that he actually, wait, threatens world security, in short, this is the united state is good, the united states, which has some business everywhere, some interests of its own, which are everywhere stick their nose in without asking. so he came up with where the colonization of russia is so that it does not threaten. yes, but make your comments

accepted. ah well, i wanted to proceed with your permission. and that we are talking about the destruction of russia , we should not destroy russia, but several calm down. calm down to format, of course. yes , in order to save russia from imperialism, which we now see in practice in ukraine tell me, please, the turala and from siberia and when tell me, please, you know a little about russia too, and to whom and when in history it managed to reformat russia in such a way that when and to whom the ninety-first year of the ninety-first year did not end, as we see it exists in russia. maybe yes, she lost them in their territory and in influence then. well here we are now back, of course you don't like it. yes, of course, russia can be said, let him add, when ben hajj said that we need to prepare for

russia russia, he did not mean that the united states would, uh, ruin russia, he thinks that russia's pernicious policy in ukraine will lead to the very collapse of russia how did the soviet union itself collapsed itself and the united states and the west should prepare for this collapse. what are the hands of these modern dissidents yes, and how of which almost all second-rate second-rate directors of second-rate hacks in crossword journalists. well, of course, they were not useful at home. now they will bark from there. of course, you know, after all, everything new is good, forgotten old. and some people are trying to say that here are the current problems. they are from february of this year. someone, then, says no, after all, from the fourteenth year, but here i completely agree that not from the fourteenth year and not even from 2008, and not from the famous speech of vladimir vladimirovich putin in munich, but the

origins. of course, much, but hidden deeper in history, and i, as a historian, want to say that in fact, the confrontation between the collective west and our orthodox power of our country. it is, of course, in reality, but it has a thousand-year history from great eschism, when it means catholics, the pope of rome said, no, you will do as i say, i will dominate, and everything orthodox is wrong and this great split of christianity into orthodoxy happened and catholicism we are fine in fact, who knows the history well remember the crusades when captured constantinople by deceit, entering, so like by, we have nothing against this year 1.204, of course, it was a very long time ago, but they went in and plundered. we are well aware that, of course, it is not by chance that he refers to the fifteenth century. this american expert analyst. and because, of course, in the xv century there were, and tectonic and

political shifts in the world, we understand that constantinople was captured by the ottomans. and it was actually. the first such global, sanctions war, when the ottomans blocked trade routes and the great silk road from china from india , in fact, could not continue unhindered in europe and, of course, and western europeans with catholic flags rushed to look for other ways to india, china and began to create their own maritime empires. and here it is important to understand that they began to act in a completely different way and with different approaches. they began to look for these ways on the ships. and when you are building a maritime empire, you can come, and if you are stronger, if you have more guns, and rob and return to the metropolis with impunity, a our country, too, as part of the large christian world, of course, began to search through the continent and we began to build a continental empire. and these are completely different approaches; you cannot come to rob and sail away with impunity

. e within the framework of the dialogue. skanda not one hundred years and it will end for this confrontation. it just can't, and we, of course, are like a bone in the throat. and of course, we are talking about destruction and decay. we saw how systematically we worked against the russian empire. we understand how surprised we were later to see a communist on the ruins of the russian empire, who actually transformed his views very much in 15 years. and in fact. stalin recreated the russian empire practically within the same borders, so five of the soviet solidages, the world, became the enemy. why does the west need the collapse of russia ? it is necessary to remember, for example, the nation yes in the xix century, how russia existed there, as well as an equal member of her husband, remember the year 1.848 thousand. excuse me, what events after we reached moscow lit it up and when we had to return, we had to

return to liberate berlin from napoleon, you know, and princesses to paris, and now, when our troops for some reason hit the teeth, only then was suddenly agreed to a concert nation. this is very this very short historical memory. why do you have to give every 100 years? so it's tough for you to have two generations sitting and trembling, but for some reason on the third generation you again want to come and plunder our resources. why you can’t have a human dialogue normally, because everything is fast, when i tell the truth, please. yes, let us well remember another thousand 848, yes, how , for example, the russian army acted. yes, that's fine, wait called. yes, that is, austria-hungary called you. austria then suppressed your put hungary including, it was the stick of the constitutional order. how fashionable to say that

's fine, and it was a confrontation, or is it some kind of vulgar word, friendship or what? right? that's right, when russia is strong, when russia doesn't fit in, which has always been against you by no means the first world war. this net did not fight, despite its, so to speak, twelfth roots. yes, you also fought in the country. oh god of the west, so history is constantly in germany and hungary is built. and this is not the west, and that is not. sorry, of course, the cunning anglo-saxon diplomacy, of course, played solitaire games so well that at first they helped against the french in order to defeat france, then they built us as germans in order to win in germany, but then it came, our turn, and then, when it turned out that germany no, let's just remember the history of the crimean war, who fought, russia, what did it do? and the uk in the crimea what

are they doing, stop my friends i will distract you from such a deep history and your discussion is extremely fascinating. i listened, yes, but we have a different question. we are not talking about the fact that we had a confrontation with the west. it was that to hide something, we are not talking about the fact that we now have a confrontation with the west, but we are talking about growing ones. the aggressive plans of the west to repeat the ninety- first year then collapsed the soviet union apparently. we will not talk now, but with their participation for sure. now they want repetition. repeat the banquet, please, or i'm wrong. just cause, that's what it means that there is a task in the brain, and it really is to reformat russia and all conversations. uh, when else could we talk? uh, they

prove it with western analysts. here is the fact that russia, in principle, cannot be reformatted, and this can be seen on its history, say, from the same fifteenth century. eh, it is impossible to prove to them, but they do not understand what is, and let's call them historical communities that are not amenable to reform and reformat. here is the second, regarding the so-called fifth column, and the gentlemen you have shown. so, since i'm used to thinking in terms of categories and a manager, it amazes me. that's all this rhetoric about what needs to be done. so-and-so, i'm sorry, i still have n't seen a single plan. well, if you like, a business plan in stages, implementation with a miscalculation of all consequences, that's it all, yes, russia is bad,

the russian empire must be deprived of its imperialism. something needs to be done with her on the side of good on the side of evil everyone should know it, you can shake the air like, uh, not like decades and centuries, which actually happens. suffice it to say that today, for all my ambiguous attitude to this issue, i do not see an algorithm for solving this problem in russia there is no real fifth column. well, in the sense in which it existed, let's say in republican spain in the era. here in russia there is no opposition in russia there are no political forces that could formulate and even more so when they came to power to implement any plans. that's nothing of this simply does not exist god therefore, what are we we are talking about their plans. no, you can have whatever plans you want. i'm here, when i'm listening, that's all and i think about what

positions are occupied by these people, uttering these platitudes. uh, well i'm amazed. that's what you need to be here. here, i mean posts. well the problem is that we often hear that the west is not a threat. there are no plans, nothing exists. these are our violent fantasies, as they actually argued. let's talk about the famous question about nato's eastward expansion, when we asked why this is happening? she says yes? well, what are you, well, it's not against you. well, we just had some obligations before fishing. well, are you afraid of them? what difference does it make to you, or is there the placement of the same cutting stations that ask against whom? i am i say, no. well, of course, it's not against you. well, we hear answers like this all the time. no, we are not against you. we don’t want to ruin you , or, as grigory was quoted, who, by the way, often says that the guests of channel one. we don't mind, we don't mind, uh, we are against the state. that's

how you can ruin the state, but not ruin the country. it seems strange to me that we hear this thesis all the time. i'll remind you when we say. uh, putin mentioned this not so long ago when he spoke with clinton. he also spoke about that the period when putin was not yet the president of russia and asked if the options for russia to join nato, the client told him that you were laughing, but where are you with a pig's snout. e in kalashny ryad. uh, when as soon as we start talking about some kind of tight integration, with the same european union, they immediately explain to us that, unfortunately, we have not come out of the physiognomy and actually into this civilized world. it can’t fit in in any way, but the problem is also that in fact only russia today can, by and large, challenge the total american dominance, which we are talking about, because the united states they well done, they correctly calculated. that a modern empire is not necessarily a control territory. it is mind control economic control. uh,

the dominance of the dollar as a global currency , the dominance of the financial institutions of the investment funds of the united states. and in fact, many countries that understand that this is a dishonest and unfair world. they still can't do it china is afraid of the united states china can't even to get out of the influence of american sanctions and is afraid somehow, but to go a little left a little right to help russia what if it gets to the united states this is china, which it would seem that there is humiliating publicly, therefore only russia, uh, says that this the world is unfair not shy. it's the rest of everyone whispering in the corners, but in reality the united states will be put in jail very hard. you know what interests me too. they always have different arguments in the west collectively, then they fight the russian empire, because they fighting communism because communism will disappear. now they're fighting russia because and in 1959 the enslaved nations law was passed in the united states. let's snippet, listen from that law. since the

enslavement of a significant part of the world's population by communist imperialism turns the idea of ​​the peaceful existence of nations into a mockery and damages the natural ties and understanding of the people of the united states with other peoples. and since since 1918. imperialist the policy of russian communism has led to the creation of a vast empire that is a sinister threat to the security of the united states and all the free peoples of the world. and so, as the imperialist policy of communist russia led through direct and indirect aggression to the enslavement and deprivation of the national independence of poland hungary lithuania ukraine czechoslovakia latvia estonia belarus romania east germany bulgaria continental china armenia azerbaijan georgia north korea albania and delural tibet cossacks turkistan north vietnam and others, and since these enslaved nations

have seen the united states. eh citadel of human liberty seek their guidance in their liberation and independence the president of the united states is authorized and asked to issue a proclamation declaring the third week of july 1959 the week of the enslaved nations the president is further authorized and asks to issue a similar proclamation annually until freedom is achieved and independence for all the enslaved nations of the world is necessary clarifications drill ural - this is all the name of the volga-tatar legion, which the germans formed in the forty-second year, but it was planned to create such a republic and the cossacks - this is hitler's project to create a cossack state on the don, but that's not the point. look at the list. and where is russia, if this is the communist

enslavement of the peoples, then the russian people were also enslaved by the communists or not, it means not doing it in communism. the fact is that they were hiding behind the fact that they are fighting communism, in fact. it is precisely in this law that they are fighting with russia and here anti-communism was not so formally the russian people, as the state- forming people. at least during the period of stalin no, in fact. moreover, soviet communism was international; it proclaimed internationalism, behind which, in fact, stood the suppression of all national foundations, including russian ones, of course. here, in fact, is the basis for all this and the second language of the culture of the economy, and then the strange suppression of some regions, these are not all reduced to the economy in fact

in fact, because the leaders of the soviet union abandoned brezhnev’s literature, as we suppressed it so much, that the national languages, many national languages, were actually formed during the soviet period, at least the writing of all this was included in the socialist camp of the violent as a result of actions following the results of the second world war. well, why do you say that? well, once again the formalchik was found included, but all countries. it is not true. yes, the votes were false. there were a lot of communists there among estonians, latvians, who were not seen in society even in the soviet union. i did not enter, wait, i see it, i see the enslaved armenians in the soviet union. yes, especially enslaved georgians. i just see, yes, with my own eyes, the year

of azerbaijanis, turkestan, which has turned into several states that we are now discussing. in my opinion. this is part, but of a certain historical fact, which consists in the following that globally two ideologies have reached the final of history. they can be called differently and a huge number scientific words to use, but this is liberal capitalism. and that's what they offered. we are in the format of socialism communism. and now, uh, fragments of this ideology can, by the way, be viewed in a very interesting document signed by the president on september 5 of this year, the concept of humanitarian policy. russia abroad, and in fact, the root of the confrontation is that we have a different approach; moreover, they are not just two different approaches - these are two antagonist approaches that cannot but clash with

universal things and in general management planetary earth to the fact that, uh, how it should work at all, because, well, like what countries were enslaved by communism in the fifty-ninth year, when, in fact, it was still going on in the united states itself , and the proteid, moreover, in the acute phase, it was impossible for a person with a non-white skin color to ride in just one taxi or there in one minibus, a and a bus with a white man. and about what kind of enslavement in general and with various phrases? here you can say the word slavery, say that the soviet union was a concept of development, it very different from the world state is not composed to another. but the soviet union no longer exists, it has collapsed. but what factors influenced the collapse. let's just see the time to remember . today begins the countdown of the new history of the soviet union of the former soviet union

, a single state occupying 1/6 of the land will no longer be december 1991. put in the title of the soviet union of socialist republics a great country that existed for almost 70 years disappeared, and on its fragments 11 independent states that had to start their lives from scratch. but was it only the desire of yesterday's allies to gain independence that caused the collapse, the ussr the red threat to the western world was invented by us president harry truman almost immediately after the end of world war ii, put forward in 1947 a doctrine aimed at combating communism, totalitarian regimes imposed on a free people undermine the foundations of international peace and research security of the united states through direct or indirect aggression this is how the policy of containment of soviet influence in the world began, which turned into a cold

war and an iron curtain for the country of the soviets. faced with a new round of western aggression , the soviet government in the fifties and sixties will make a number of erroneous decisions, both in domestic and foreign policy, which will lead to a food crisis, a decrease in cash reserves in the treasury and even more isolation of the ussr in the mid-seventies, trying to improve the economy the country will be in the oil game, this will also skillfully the united states will also take advantage of it by provoking a global oil crisis with the help of the middle east. and they are bearing a serious blow to the soviet union, oil is the only soviet product that the world still agreed to buy and since it came out. so all the kremlin's wealth was based on oil, then reagan forced the saudis to take and flood the market. cheap oil, the consequences are known the oil crash hit the belt of the ussr painfully and the eighties will be remembered for the significant lag of the union from western countries, insufficient provision of the population with food

food until the introduction of the rationing system and a colossal increase in dependence on food imports, but the real beginning of the end of the soviet empire will be the loss of the eastern european satellites in the fall of 1989. this process was called the autumn of nations, then in most of the countries of the warsaw pact there was a wave of change of power, communist regimes fell one after another poland and hungary east germany czechoslovakia bulgaria and romania all those who are still in the middle. in the fifties, it was a member of the european military socialist union with the leading role of the ussr left it entirely, turning back the soviet government watched the collapse of communism in eastern europe in silence, allowing the former allies to decide their own internal affairs such a policy would be called doctrine by the senators at the end of october 1989 in helsinki, the press office of the ussr foreign ministry gerasimov officially announced that the

brezhnev doctrine in dead. instead, with arrows. he we will have the doctrine of the senatra by this meant the last line of the song i did it my way so the soviet union allowed the neighboring the state to choose its own path, losing sight of the fact that very soon the soviet republics will want their own path and the contradictions between the peoples grew stronger and stronger. first calls. we went from the baltic in 1989. there was held the baltic way action, which was performed. independence and already march 11, 1990. lithuania became the first republic to leave the ussr , a parade of sovereignties began, and in a few months all the supreme councils of the union republics adopted a declaration of independence, and on december 8, 1991 the heads of the three republics of the founders of the ussr, russia, ukraine and belarus, signed the belovezhskaya agreement, in which they announced the termination

of the union of soviet socialist republics and the creation of the commonwealth of independent states. why this story was shown, well , first of all, half a mile to our viewers. among them there are also young people, as it was. and secondly, i still, well, there is concern again. they are taken so seriously since they are so weakly pronounced since such an argument sounds like we can’t achieve a repeat there so it’s you who ruined us. or have we fallen apart? well, it is obvious that you are the most, of course, the us west say. so uh made his little contribution to my mother. well, of course, by the time of gorbachev, of course, this is spikes of clay feet. everything is rotten. so it's like a quality house, yes, that is, to blow and that's it, and that's it. uh, it will crumble and crumble, but for some reason, nothing crumbled on china dooli dooli. yes, yes, russia is not china, but it has already turned into historical jokes

when the leader of the chinese communist party the state came to gorbachev, besides the same thing. and gorbachev just canceled the article of the leading role of the party. and he asked him, he said, well , look, yes, here we are shaking along a bumpy road with you. right here, sparkling with lights highway no need to make an effort to turn there, well, how do you turn there without a rudder. that's what he did, in fact, the bright memory of him, yes, mikhail sergeyevich gorbachev, he refused the leading role of the party. and it was the only one, in my opinion, a political state body, which worked even then in the soviet union worked drove khrushchev when he arranged ah. this one with the cult of personality, stalin, and so on, and densiopin did not repeat this mistake, i must say. mao zedong stayed so that monolithic china would not split, therefore, of course, the cracks had already been made, khrushchev, in his report on the twentieth trip

further, these cracks began to diverge and the americans and the british and french. funded very well. here is the fifth column. in our country , under the guise of a dissident movement, they received all sorts of radios, launched leaflets, and took them away, and therefore, of course, they added this rust very strongly. with all sorts of financial and other frauds, times have changed in these no these ways. is it possible to destroy russia today or not? it is absolutely clear that no matter how strong external pressure would be without their own. e bugs. eh, you still won’t ruin the country in the same ninety- first year, of course, i agree with mike, after all, the main fault lies with the leadership of the soviet union, which made both economic mistakes and political mistakes. uh, so lesson 12 is easy, if you have, uh, a normal, working economy. eh,

at least? i think many problems. you can easily avoid. actually, it is no coincidence that there is a conflict with us. after all, it is being carried out in a complex way , including economic and war, the task of any war of the cold war or the fact that we are happy, including, uh, inflicting economic damage on the removal of resources from us so that we can function normally, and further on, the already social mechanism of social conflict is swinging there, and everyone is asking what is really, and reagan's conniving with the saudis and so on greatly undermined. so , finally, you still breathe the economy of the soviet union. there are an incredible amount of sanctions against us. someone out there counted more than 11,000 sanctions. yes, it can stop us or even tear us apart. what do you think? i think that there are simply different forecasts. the question is. what makes them for what political purpose, of course, if you look at geostrategic problems, then

certainly the simplest three words that you can to say that everything will be fine and will be real, but another question is that it is never good without the right goal-setting, without the right strategy, without reasonable competent tactics. and you need to be prepared for the fact that you will change this tactic several times, and so on and so forth. that's when the ninety- one happened. and by the way, i can not share. i have seen these shots, which have now been shown many times , and it still hurts me. that's objective every time i see it i feel right here's the physical and mental suffering. but then we decided to change the strategy. right now, if you do not change the strategy, but simply, but make some tactical retreats , take care of yourself within yourself with your economy, strengthening your sovereignty. i think that indeed the forecasts are the most favorable. i've just never been a dissident, but at least the frontier is here. there, of course, everyone in the kitchen said everything and everyone understood what was happening.

those who did not understand agreed with those who understood and, well, it so happened that even before the collapse the soviet union went to the united states of america and watched the collapse from there. and well, it would seem that this changes my life a lot, because they were leaving. we were forever deprived of our soviet citizenship before leaving. and now here is freedom and you can come at any time and visit relatives and the graves of loved ones. yes, but i looked with the same eyes that you looked, i looked with wild regret that now the kolos is really collapsing and history is being made, there will be no way out. why am i saying this, that i am absolutely convinced that we did the conclusions have drawn lessons and this will certainly not happen again with russia. queen

elizabeth ii of great britain passed away yesterday. she was 96 years old, of these 96 she sat on the throne for 70 years. during this time, 15 prime ministers were replaced by great britain and thanos began to be a great military churchill , while the great iron lady margaret also ruled under her. and it's a shame, of course, that her last act. the political act was the resignation of johnson, which she accepted and the appointment of a sheet of tracks and a pitiful principle that had been waiting for so long. i've been waiting so long for him to finally reign, and i'm sorry for him, because with this prime minister he will have to start his royal career, horror.