only e-gas storage facilities will be ready europe can fully impose an embargo on the import of russian gas within the framework of the eighth package of sanctions, but the european commission, or rather the council of the european union, failed to agree on a price ceiling for e-russian gas, and in this regard, the european commission proposes a different option. yes , tomorrow, uh, it is expected that ursula fondlyaem will introduce it and, as the british curtain writes, it will involve increased taxation of european energy companies with additional taxes on them. do you think it will help somehow deal with the energy crisis. uh. you absolutely correctly described the situation only a little bit. uh, refinement small on the windfall on the windfall, that is, in other words. they don't want to quit anyway. uh, so to speak, their major suppliers of e energy. uh, the very fact that there was another sobering up associated with the ceiling, that is, it became clear that the ceiling

would lead to the fact that everything was put out, light? uh, apparently, it still led to the fact that a new plan was developed regarding this taxation. uh, this is another proof that, apparently, after all, not everything is safe in the kingdom in that very same one. uh, the fact is that the gas storage in europe is indeed filled to a fairly large volume, that is, let's say in germany by 85%, as klaus, the head of the federal network agency, announced, but the problem is that this gas will last for 3 months. good. you are now filling up the gas storage. you will terminate completely economic relations. okay what are we going to do in 3 months, the question, that is, for these 3 months, you need to find new sources of gas somewhere and fill the gas storage further, because in order for the storage to be a box or e. so to speak, a kind of container in which there is an incoming pipe and an outgoing pipe, if only outgoing work. this means that, accordingly, the gas becomes less and less, the less gas in the volume of this gas storage, the more difficult it is to get it out of there, respectively. more energy is needed in order to be easy to get out of there, respectively , what is needed. what to add what to add no question

sources algeria offered its gas to italy but not to germany qatar offered its gas to italy but not to germany what will they supply there in 3 months, what will they do? i'm very interested in this moment, uh, the windfall tax. it's probably good. this will serve as an admission. uh, to the treasury of the european union and germany and all other countries, of course, but this will not solve the problem. the fact is that if you want to lower the price of gas, it is very easy to do this turn on nord stream one turn on nord stream 2. and the price will be what was e, approximately in january of this year, in order to turn on nord stream one , sanctions must be lifted. well, this is generally a self-evident thing. just turn it on and you get a low price, you know, you can scratch your ear through your left foot through some other place, but it will not work. enable streams. you will get low prices. that's it at the end of our conversation. i would like to return from the failed greater europe to the emerging greater eurasia. tomorrow, president of the people's republic of

china t day. the stump arrives in nursultan and when this city was also called astana, and in 2013, it was there in astana that e xi jinping made a very important speech, in which he proposed china's flagship initiative to date, an initiative that is largely associated with the name with this finya. this is the silk road economic belt. it is now called the belt and road initiative. this is indeed the flagship direction of chinese foreign policy. and this second pillar of greater eurasia and greater eurasia is of great importance. for the foreign policy of russia and for the whole world, because before our eyes, a space of security and development is being formed, where there is no zero- sum game, a space friendly to russia, and for the first time in centuries, most of the eurasian massif is being consolidated without the participation of the atlantic powers, that is, a geopolitical and

geo-economic unit is being formed, which simply has no analogues in the world. this is a truly tectonic shift of historical significance. it was a big game. good luck to you. hello, as part of the information channel on the first program, time will tell. i'm artyom sheinin we are working on the air we continue to discuss difficult when they were simple events news about the reflections of these last days. you know in an amazing way. i already spoke about this yesterday in the program, and many people now have

questions of emotion, someone somewhere is on the verge of some kind of saying. here is such a neurosis slightly. and this is how you talk to people, you explain, you ask yourself questions. himself explains something to himself that he retells that people say no to people, but i understand everything, but you tell me, huh? and at some point i began to catch myself thinking that this is all that i hear in terms of intonation, emotions , and everything that i answer them and answer myself . everything, it was already with me and i began to poke around in my memory, and i found it. i even rewound back and checked myself and i yelled- it's just now before the broadcast it was and i found it and posted it. right now you have in your telegram channel, well, sheinin, it's called a simple name. you will find i can not retell the article that i wrote on the fourth of april. do you all remember that it was april 4th. what moods did we have, what conversations did we have after what happened at the end of march? and i thought, well, now i'm going to add this article,

i'll add something there. i read it from beginning to end and realized that today , september 13, i can’t change a single word in it, because, if it’s very briefly, it’s about the fact that ah, as it has been said more than once, there is no war one gate, and war is a very complex complex of a lot of things and diplomacy of politics and economics and psychology and anything and wherever you are no matter where you are, you never fully understand what is drawn there on that map, which is somewhere where the largest map is not this map, and even, most likely, not a map of europe, but another map. and i realized that those emotions are understandable, largely due to the events that we are now experiencing all this with us. it was already early april. i was amazed myself. it's just that i plunged into

this time absolutely deja vu at the beginning of april, then there was the end of april, and then there was may, then there was june, then there was july, and that's how it works. that's how it's done, no only fighting. that's how life works, that's how politics works. but what will happen at the next step, after you have become a little depressed, depends on how quickly you come to your senses, pull yourself together and understand that nothing is ending now. and you don’t even quite understand what is happening, or maybe you don’t understand at all what is needed, but to calm down and pull yourself together you will be at the level at which you can analyze. so to speak some well for myself, at least understanding what went wrong and where it went wrong. each of us has a different level and work on to fight on to serve on to work on to do on to collect help on and so on. moreover, at this

turn now in september. it seems to me that we are making an effort. strange as it may sound, our opponents of our visa holders have a lot more clarity. this clarity is now being presented to us. well, much more in such a concentrated form, as if , working for ours, depriving us of some unnecessary illusions of hope, and so on and so forth. similar, because i already quoted yesterday, there is both the new york times and the bild, in which it is written in english and white that the offensive actions of the ukrainian army were carried out with the participation of the united states of america and nato instructors, that intelligence data was supplied to them. the nato bloc and so on and so forth are even more so today, well, this is called for those who did not understand the first time. the same new york times even more clearly tells you and me what is actually happening in

that cell of a huge party called here is ukraine, what they are doing there, no one is hiding anything, they are called by their proper names, please. ukraine's strategy for rapid military success began to take shape in a series of tense conversations between ukrainian and us officials a few months ago, on zelenskiy's orders, the ukrainian military proposed a broad offensive in the south to seize kherson and cut off mariupol, however, us officials. it was considered that such a large-scale attack would entail huge ukrainian losses and did not help to quickly return the territory then the ukrainian command decided to start sharing the details of their plans with american and british employees. intelligence began to ask their advice jake sullivan spoke several times with the head of the office of the president of ukraine andriy yermak in planning a counteroffensive, in turn , general mark meely held conversations with high-ranking us military officials, the parties shared intelligence and discussed issues of military assistance

according to us ukrainian officials time was of the essence, in order to carry out an effective counterattack the ukrainians had to act before the first snow. when vladimir putin can use his control over gas supplies to put pressure on europe, the editorial tells us in plain text, you guys are discussing there that there is a ukrainian one, that means an offensive in the northeast, guys, this is an american offensive. you're already good at doing nonsense and tearing your hair out. this is an american offensive on the northeastern flank of the front, and the point is not that this is just an article. i don't think it's just a newspaper. i think that this article, well, it’s not just that such redacting articles appear, but because, well, here you are no longer journalists. and the secretary of state of the united states of america, blinkin, says about the same text that he says, even more, not only about what it is, but not coming. and about the fact that they just

started, please. ukraine had the equipment needed to carry out this counter-offensive, which has one clear goal return the lands that were captured. this is just the beginning, so i think it would be wrong to predict. how exactly events will develop further, when and how something will be achieved, but it is clear that we are seeing a significant progress of ukrainians, especially in the northeast, and this result of the support that we provided. in my opinion, everything is very clearly articulated and everyone. who else has some illusions that it is possible somewhere else to somehow grind something, well, they deprive a person, he says, guys. we are at war with you, we are at war with the ukrainian infantry, but you know, it's the same with the roman empire, the roman legions. they are roman legions, regardless of who they recruit

some parthians or anyone else who fight for the roman empire ceases to be a parthian there or who fought for them there, they become the army of the roman empire and we are told guys, the empire with you started to fight is not going to stop. and you answer, we discussed yesterday. you designate what you translate. uh, confrontation to a new level. you e long were going to hit the structure of the dual purpose of providing life. you hit the power industry. you disable the test. we got the hint. we took the hint that you want to get away from the war. eh, a la the first world war and go to the level of the 21st century war with those resources that you have a lot of and with which you can do it. yes, we get it. okay, okay. the challenge has been accepted, and today it is absolutely obvious to me that the answer to this move, which is formulated, sounds absolutely obvious. like something there some kind of regular warranty requirements

security of something, but there are very clear points in which we are warned about very important things. now listen, and then i will share with you what i think. uh, what are we being warned about, please. the treaty will unite the main group of allied countries and ukraine united states united kingdom canada poland italy germany france australia turkey as well as the countries of northern europe and the baltic states, central and eastern europe require long-term stable investments in the military-industrial base of ukraine large-scale transfer of weapons and intelligence support from allies, intensive training missions and joint exercises under the auspices of the european union and nato, the structure of the kiev security treaty provides for a full-fledged sanctions package against the aggressor country, and may also contain additional components, for example, the agreement on providing ukraine with modern air defense systems and regional security agreements. in the black sea and so

on, the extension of these guarantees to the entire territory of ukraine within the internationally recognized borders, a ban on the lifting of sanctions against the russian federation in including, until it compensates for the damage, security guarantees do not replace ukraine's desire to join nato. and this paragraph prohibits the lifting of sanctions against the russian federation, including until it compensates for the damage. this is a direct signal to us that the guys are at war with you. we wouldn't be going to stop and you have no other option but to win? because if you do not win, or even just do not lose, then the terms of the peace treaty will be like this. that we will undress you endlessly because? what is the indemnity we are being hinted at? it's the same as endlessly. yes, there all these jackals of tobacco there yermak begin to jump further that we owe russia that we can repeat there. before that,

some of them, i already do not understand the varieties of this shit. which of them said there that we should make sure that their children pay their grandchildren there, and so on and so forth, it is clear that they repeat the language, like a tiger, who tells them that, well, that is, here, as if the russians keep in mind, it’s not you who stand undressed, stripped like sticky and we will strip endlessly, that is, on way out of this conflict. we now understand what we can have. yes, we may have some kind of peace treaty, the only question is whether it will be a peace treaty, a la the paris peace treaty of 1856 after the crimean war, no matter how lost. or the portman peace treaty of 1905 after the war with japan, as it were, not completely lost, or the brest peace of the eighteenth year, or still, yalta but in order for it to be yalta, you need to fight for yalta, since we fought for yalta

with the whole country, not only the whole army, but the whole country by the whole industry by the whole society by the whole elite, and then and then these intonations will change in this sense. it seems to me that that analysis of what happened is an analysis. there are some difficulties, difficulties and so on. it should now be carried out from the point of view that everything is extremely clear with whom about what and what is the output, if not possible, respectively, i propose, based on this, and discuss. what a what so not really so and so on, let's go. well, i think that the haryaker is a specially military operation. should definitely change. because what we used to demonstrate played according to international rules and followed conventions. that is, we tried to play by the rules against us, those who did n’t follow any rules played against us, and it’s clear that this game was

built with such an eye on the future, so that later the results of our special military operation would be recognized by the west, and we would again restore some then there is a relationship. i want to say that there is no need to harbor any illusions that the west will not restore any relations with russia. they will question how to russia in what quantity? that is, now they will not talk to us. they clearly said that there would be no negotiations between 2020 and 24, so that we would understand that they are serious, apart from this document. here is the success that the ukrainian army is awarded there. in fact, it was provided by mercenaries mercenaries from the al-qaeda terrorist organizations igil muhaharam and others. and i want what i want, and it matters if you have military operations and you , so to speak, well, they were not entirely successful

has the meaning. and who was it, if uh the enemy turned out to be one way or another in fact. i 'll explain now. it matters from their point of view, because they have already done it. they did it. this is in nagorno-karabakh, when 2,500 mercenaries broke through the front, which was held by the armenian military, that is, they consider it to be such an action. we will go to some of their ultimatum, this is what you presented here this text. you know we won't give ultimatums. listen and so on, we ourselves know how to write them. no, listen to them you have to listen to them. i'll tell you what will happen next it's clear that these mercenaries have now migrated somewhere to the south, they will try to repeat something, these are murderers and so on or near donetsk because today and today, for example, i listen like this. here is the news and already in the news it is not only the south that is being discussed,

in the news. discussed like but donetsk yes, as it were, but what about donetsk, right? that is, they repeat, that is, the success that he was not so impressionable, but the results. i think even the investigative committee of russia may not have been very good, impressive, then, uh, the character once again repeat the character and his should change, as the terrorist methods. so we are a counter -terrorist operation. yeah, with all the consequences, so, uh, you understand, that is, it changes the fact that these conventions are international laws, they have a convention with bo. firstly, no one agrees with terrorists, their structure must be destroyed unambiguously. so we used siri with all of their, uh, sensitive infrastructure that kept them fighting . she was destroyed. here we are talking for example, well, for example, they had an oil business. yes, we completely destroyed it. we destroyed, uh, all the things that allowed them to be supplied with weapons of military equipment, destroyed all the camps,

destroyed everything. although these camps, for example, were next to refugee camps, that is, the entire infrastructure that fueled these terrorist organizations that operate on the territory of the syrian arab republic was completely destroyed, i understand what you are talking about, the only, well, logical clarification that i wanted to make that it was a terrorist state, and the infrastructure that we are destroying now, we can call it whatever you like, but in the eyes of part of the world community. it is still a state after all. well, you know, they were also perceived there as a kind of moderate position. they called me bashar and said that they have the right to some kind of parliaments there and the political ones did not say so. well, there, they repainted it right there, they were all isis. this is understandable, they were called differently so they went to geneva for some negotiations. rides here too. so, e. i say, this is the organization. this is ukrobonderovskaya, as you like. call it controls the entire territory enjoys the

benefits. this is territory. she approaches. understood. i 'm trying to find out. now that you have formulated this ideology. this terrorist organization, terrorist methods, terrorist means terrorist mercenaries, and now, in your opinion, we can and must move on. to action. specifically. what more large-scale type, and with the use of more funds defeat, and with an increase in e, the forces of the personnel of military equipment involved. that is, we should not play as we used to play, as if it were for the hand behind the back, and we fought with one hand, no, with both hands with the feet of everyone because uh, that's it, there will be no agreements until we win, so we must to win if we do not do it to our compatriots. there will be killing. daily. this is happening in the abandoned areas. i am sure that in the territory that we liberate we will liberate again. yes, we will find a few huts. i'm absolutely sure of this. what are we, the whole world is already

dreaming of the atrocity that is being done under the auspices of this ukrainian army, as it calls itself there? there are killers, there are terrorists of all positions, so let's not, uh, talk nonsense with them, yes, and do that there are some rules of war there, there are no rules of war. there's nothing to stop us from being almondy, and we have to move on to another format. uh, yours or no longer yours? well, i don’t know what it will be called after finishing. it does not matter. yes what is important is the methods that should work that they threw these mercenaries into battle. this suggests that they currently lack capable units of the same skill and such atrocity. gotta use this. well, after a defeat, go on a counteroffensive, do not wait for them to come up there, you need to act. this is the army, ours is able to, and uh, let's say, there are some

political visions. we must now put aside, but that it does not matter. i got it, by the way please remember there was a transmission obviously incredible. there was a beautiful screensaver. well, how many wonderful discoveries the enlightenment prepares for us, the spirit and experience, the son of difficult mistakes and the genius of paradoxes, my friend surprises me that this continues to surprise us, that it turns out we can’t be at war a little bit. and it is impossible and it was necessary not to be silly from the very beginning. well, maybe i am . an old-timer in politics, but i want to note that in the nineties, when we fought against signing, first signing, then ratifying a friendship treaty, cooperation and partnership with ukraine because they understood that this was a fake agreement that would bring us nothing but shame. i remember how our then

foreign minister defended this treaty from the rostrum of the federation council. igor ivanov in his hearts told the critics of those who argued with him to us. don't you understand that the west always stands behind ukraine, he said this in 1998. 23 years have passed since then. and this is how we were surprised to find that, it turns out, we are fighting not with ukraine, but with the whole west. listen, i really hope that the people who make the decision with us from the very beginning were not delusional. although how this operation began. i got the impression that for some reason they gave up and considered that illusions have the right to life to accuse the military of all grave sins. i beg you. i'm not you , i'm not blaming the military at all. thank god, i blame all of us and judge by the results, which are clear to everyone that subsistence. yes, these results indicate that miscalculations were made in terms of underestimating the enemy overestimating

own efforts. here's what it's about. you can reassure yourself as much as you like by the fact that isis terrorists are fighting with us and so on. firstly, there is no secret in this, and from the very beginning i do not have time for myself. and secondly, i want to say that now the conclusions are the most important thing, and the sooner we draw these conclusions, the better, firstly, we will stop. really fool yourself with the name of a special military operation, because we are talking, as we have already found out about the war, and i say so, and not today, and since eight of this year, that we are talking about the patriotic war, this was written, it was written in the month of may, spoke at the council on foreign defense policy, said that, in fact, this is the patriotic war for survival. but we continued to think, out of good intentions, that in fact we were moving in such a way as not to affect the civilian population in any way. you know when they tell us military reports

that 4,000 ukrainian servicemen died. we struck and killed 200-300. it's not me at all pleases. we struggle with our reflection in the mirror with the same as we are confident in our rightness. and we must understand this. we must make efforts from above in order to convince them, but to convince or break it, first break it, because nothing else is necessary when it comes to military operations. and those who are under our control today in these territories have been released to convince them. and of course, when we arrange this back and forth, then in this case, of course, we have few arguments left in order to convince, because the posters are hanging russia has come in earnest and for a long time. we must be responsible for our words. yes, and under these posters people are now being mocked. i'm not going here, i'm

generally far from any panic alarmists - these are those who speak. oh, we we were defeated, we must immediately capitulate. i say we lost and failed in order to ensure victory, because i absolutely agree from the very beginning that we have in general after we got involved in this story of the other there is simply no choice but victory. you say i already suggested this a long time ago. i said that it is impossible to pretend that our countries are alive. as you usually do. and this means in practice that this concerns not only the display of this some kind of software. this is already, as it were, not the most important idea, there, i'm talking about the fact that the war management system should be rebuilt. this is the first thing that it should be coordinated, that different departments cannot participate in different ways. they tell us, for example , in some programs, they say the minister of industry said, yes, we have everything. the military simply does not ask

us to give us all this, but the military say at different levels that we also have everything, we don’t need anything. they are the same level, when it comes to battalions, and companies, and so on. no, we don't have enough. this one, this one, which one of them is right, all this should be within the framework of one command of dishes. this must be coordinated, and it is time to do this, because there is a serious struggle for survival for the patriotic war. that's about what's coming speech. you see, of course, we produced, well, we responded with a blow to the critical energy structure. well , how much did we talk during the month? because it is impossible to imagine since this technique travels from west to east. stop these communications. explain this, look, i'm not arguing with you, because i'm even less than you understood, because i'm not an old-timer in politics, and i'm both young and not in politics. and today i had a conversation about this dash argument with one and, as it were, my friend, who

he also told me why we didn't start doing it. there immediately here is the infrastructure tests and so on and so forth, i asked her. i have, as it were, in this sense, i asked her, please tell me, but what do you think, even you, who supported your very beginning. if only in march. they hit the mains, they would have left without electricity . there, all of kharkov, and so on and so forth, you yourself would have been able to digest it in march, she scratched her turnips and said, i don’t know. so what's the conversation about? i hope not yours acquaintances determines, the military operation is not an expert in this matter is true, but the fact is that the people who determine the military operations and not only who determine the military operations, but that's all around it, they are also likely. uh, well, despite the fact that they make these decisions at completely different levels. they, too, are like us now, in hindsight, all that we had

to do was for him from the very beginning, if they did not understand this, then they made a professional mistake in this regard. i don't require heads. i'm talking about what was done to be drawn from this conclusion. i'm not going to defend anyone. we'll move on now, i'm not going to defend anyone. but here, in fact, in the same article of mine that i wrote, well, there, referring to my military experience, and these days i even said it ten times, maybe more, with my fellow soldiers, who say, what they didn't do what they didn't do this, and what they didn't do fifth. i say, you know, when you and i were going somewhere in slide. i brought my plate from the minot, and i walked next to you from the horde, 30 kilograms each, and we understood that there this hill it doesn’t lead anywhere there, well, it’s like a dead end, and we cursed. and what is the battalion commander and what is the cumbric, and what do you understand at the headquarters? we did not know what they had drawn on the map; they had a map. maybe forty-three. which was made up when no one reached this hill, it

is drawn there. what is it, you know? well, this is all learned in practice. no one has ever been on this hill before and until we got there. so they didn’t sit on this hill, it didn’t. it is clear that she has no further to go anywhere. this does not mean that the people who planned this operation do not understand anything. they might not have known this at the very moment when they were planning. i am not making excuses for anyone. it's bad, but, but, you know, now we know it's bad, of course. but when now in all these conversations, and all these exclamations. what did they think? here's a quick listen, well, in the end we were preparing for war. e years that way with 30 of some kind at least in june of 1941, knowing everything, warning everything, pawning everything, and it was, of course, another other ideology and so on. well, something like we were not very prepared at first. despite the fact that there was a system and there was an ideology, there was another and everything and everything and everything. nevertheless, we began to learn a lot after june 22, 1941. so that the t5 and bt-7 are excellent tanks for one type of hostilities, and for

another type they are not very good expensive, artyom, well, firstly, the comparison is not unlawful evidence, because by the time we made such a mistake, in the forty-first year, the country with which we started to fight had already fought for at least 2 years in the world war, the goals of western ukraine, western belarus, a brand, and moreover, it was absolutely permeable to to know what is going on there. there they sold secrets, at each level briefly about the forty-first year, which is usually forgotten by everyone in the forty-first year. we began to fight without aerial reconnaissance and thanked marshal tukhachevsky for this, who was shot in the thirty-seventh year. i'll tell you. here we also fought airless reconnaissance, there is a man who in 2007 in the future in a high rank closed all topics and developments by his order. we repeated the mistakes of the forty- one. yes, he was the minister of defense in 2007. advertising on channel one then we

will continue there is a great way to teach a child financial literacy free tinkoff junior card get a tinkoff junior card and we will help the child in the first financial matters. tinkoff he such a theater begins with a hanger, and a performance with the porridge of the viewer, when the cough interferes, no matter what it is dry or wet rengalin helps to cope with any cough in acute respiratory viral infections rengalin for adults and children from 3 years old and dry and wet porridge with rengalin we are not afraid.

now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with credit from sovcombank make important purchases at today's prices and turn all your plans back on sovcombank people are more important packages for only 9 rubles. multifurnace simfer for 1999 rubles. you turn on the online cinema start and you feel how breathtaking, how overwhelmed with emotions you feel that you are looking at the start this fall. watch exclusive premieres of container series. i express black spring. there

are many more tv shows and movies, you feel that you are watching start install the application and try start for free hinges, the weakest point, but i don’t have the latest complex of native collagen of the second type to maintain freedom of movement artyom the power of native collagen for joints. i look at your goods more and more, and what about the express loan from vtb - vtb said a new line of furniture, i want to launch, but it doesn’t work out for the money, and they do need an express loan for business up to 10 million rubles. without collateral and documents with approval, they will find out in 5 minutes, and where to apply, where it is convenient to submit an application, and so it was with a reliable bank. and you will be helping vtb. deed. there are people who always want more than just life, but a life with a plus plus more km plus more

confidence. plus more power updated ectoplus fuel from lukoil more pluses more efficiency. novelty of the year from stoloto big sportloto choose the numbers yourself more than 60, drawings per day a chance to become a millionaire at any time dream big win a super prize from 300 million rubles. daily anti -virus action eliminates symptoms. and colds are also suitable for children, viruses season is quite a check of feron. why do i invest in the best opportunities always in a crisis is it time to learn new investments? install the tinkoff app

investments. complete a training course and receive a package of shares worth up to 20,000 rubles as a gift. tinkoff he's the only one forest fires occur through the fault of man. stop and defeat the fire. the vocation is strong, forest firefighters of the rosleskhoz protection . 90 years of guarding the forests of russia pokazhet continue to work live. i am now in the previous part, when we talked, here with my esteemed guests and now we will continue, i caught myself thinking that there is in my at least life and work. well a lot, of course results of a special military operation. but there is another very important result about what you know about what happened before and how it would have become after it began, what now i understand to now give words to some of these characters who

came here, who would now start us on behalf of the international community there, on behalf of the american public, something so charming lies in the fact that i know that we can to argue not to agree to say some things. well , not very pleasant to each other, but i know for sure that in this studio there are always only those people who are all the same to me and who want there to be a transition from and to the better yes, and in this sense, we continue to talk about and extract lessons. yes from a very unpleasant yes i call a spade a spade tactical, but defeat who will speak differently. let him imagine how they think about him now, those people in raisins in kupyansk in volchansk in many other settlements, territories left behind. yes, they talk about this not from the point of view of big politics, but for them, of course, this is a huge defeat. uh, for many of them, it could cost lives; for many of them, it could cost a broken fate. and this is, among other

things, the price they pay for us to continue to make the right more effective decisions and not allow such unfortunate defeats and therefore talk about what e should now or how a special military operation should change. what should it become first of all with in terms of how we operate, what are we doing now? something we haven't done before for one reason or another. or did they not understand before, or did not do it, or did not consider it to be utterly possible, what now? maybe, in your opinion, it should change in order to achieve the victory, given that we have already been told for sure by the guys for you, even a draw is not an option. we'll even undress a draw, you'll be sticky all your life, as they say, without pants, please. before the broadcast, alexey and i discussed an interesting point, which is key. in my opinion is very many in russia has burned out, many have been subjected to despondency, because for a very long time, because it is not clear what is happening there. uh,

a lot of different conflicting information, different social networks messengers write one thing, uh, another thing on tv, and so on, but it seems to me that, in fact, e soldiers of the information war, or consumers of information, should be rotated in the same way as soldiers on the battlefield. they need to rest periodically. otherwise, they begin to burn out and their despondency, which i will remind of a mortal sin. infect others this is the first second, let me remind you that two unbeaten scorers are given. and uh at this stage. this, uh, saying works very well, just in the format of a special military operation. i very much agree with alexei that since we have a hybrid war, it means that we must act in a hybrid way. let the special military operation run its course. it is, uh, it is being formed, it was thought out by the general staff, it is being implemented, but no one will interfere with declaring a counter-terrorist operation in parallel, because

that a few months ago vsu nazty. e, as well as various other structures known to us and repeatedly. it is mentioned here that they started a terrorist war and opposing their own population and against the russian federation, this medical fact cannot be avoided, therefore no one and nothing can press by doing no, then nothing can prevent the announcement of a counter-terrorism operation with everyone. with the information legal military and special e-formats coming from here, what i mean, firstly, are those countries that, after the announcement of this e he a tourism operation that supports the financing of terrorism must have appropriate , uh, legal consequences, this is the first, so that they understand what is at stake, the second is necessary. eh, much more. uh, in my opinion, to work intensively with those special services in russia that exist, which have the necessary

skills to fight terrorism in the transcaucasus, e in the north caucasus, in syria, and so on, they need to be introduced into the e format, well, a hybrid war within the framework of who , which can be declared in the respective territories. this is the second third undoubtedly. uh, it is necessary to attract allies, then those countries that are experiencing. serious concern about what is going on in ukraine right now and who is actually taking part in uh, confrontation with us there. and the third, of course, if necessary. if it's needed, and it might be needed considering how much and who? what resources, uh, are pulled up to the formation. russia's opposition to what it is doing in the course of a special military operation must be prepared global war, including nuclear, and our opponents should know about it. this does not mean that we are announcing something to anyone, but we must

use all the tools once the threat against russia has become existential. well, you see, when when you say what can be done, i answered. i understood the board of work. i understood something else. when you say you have to be prepared right up to well basically, our concepts. yes, we must always be ready; in principle, this does not require any additional solutions. and so it shouldn't take the form of cries from the rear seats, or from the podium. there we now take you there to the dust into dust and so on. these statements are unacceptable. these statements must be acceptable actions, which are evaluated by intelligence agencies of other countries. and here we are talking about it. and what do you think, given that it is their doctrine that we have written and well, the troops of this uh, these troops are troops of constant combat readiness. right there, after all, the question is, and our, uh, opponents. and now, probably, you can

call them enemies, but they allow it. you you understand, when we have to speak, we must make it clear, and they understand it, and now the specifics on e, the fifth ramstein on the sidelines, according to my sources, the following phrase sounded. kill these bastards. who do you think said this to whom? did a nato general say this to a ukrainian ukrainian general? yes, that's all. this is the competence of what is happening now between in relations between e, the so-called collective west. he is married and ukrainian. do you understand the answer to your question? i just don't want to so that everything turns into words for us. in my opinion, talk about how to call this war a hybrid, this operation in some other way, oh, the components of money, concerns a narrow circle of specialists. maybe military philologists, but

why. here i, for example, on my own initiative , started talking about the fact that we should call it patriotic yes, because, unlike the operation of any counter-terrorist special military and so on, the war differs from it in that you start it or find yourself as a result of military actions. you cannot count on the fact that only you decide when it will end. it depends on how this war goes, the operation - it's something that you started. you can finish it. you can stop it. you can announce the end of a military operation, and so on, you can quit the operation, for example, quit the armed forces for some reason during the war. nobody will give you. if you are military, quit somewhere, because this is desertion, it must be perceived in this way this part of the effective things specifics. i already understand this, this, it seems to me, is important, and at the same time i am not saying that we must necessarily

solemnly arrange a meeting of the federation councils or let the state duma declare war on everyone and so on. i'm talking, not formally. understanding what is happening, how we should perceive what is actually happening in this, in my opinion, everyone agrees that we are at war. we are not only and not so much with ukraine as a completely consolidated west, which in this case saw in the story with ukraine the opportunity to harm us. uh-huh, and the size of this damage as events unfold. uh, delaying hostilities and so on. it increases all the time, like an appetite during a meal. indeed, in the early days, in general, the story was that well, yes, but how many weeks it will last, but 5 weeks, but 2 weeks, but 3 weeks of ukraine, now in general we are talking about, well, yes. of course, we understand that you will not take moscow, but, in principle, you must defeat and there should be no other reptiles. gotta destroy it further, their appetites grow, the idea itself

that we will be a slow step, so to speak, sparing our lives and others, and so on move forward in the direction, in my opinion it was wrong, because i repeat after napoleon what is a strategy? it is the science of using space and time napoleon says space. in the end, you can always return. and time is irrevocable. do not waste time, when you start such operations, i understand, i agree in many respects and add the following, that when such an operation takes place, it is delayed, first of all influences not what happens there, but what happens in our society. you look how much information space. it has recently influenced our society , a certain resonance has left. of course, you added this resonance. these people who managed to evacuate from these territories. but this, uh, suggests that the longer we continue this

operation, the more destructive - it will affect our society with you. because you agree, the longer it goes on, like an operation yes, like an operation, because that's what colleagues say, i say, the next thing is that counter-terrorism measures must be taken there, and shells inside too, because those alarmists, those broadcasters, those who leak false information, well, yes, we passed a law on discrediting the armed forces what a monetary fine is due for him, but he paid this fine and got off lightly, well, he said sorry, sorry, he was wrong. in fact, he caused significant harm. yes, therefore, therefore, when the deaths spoke there and so on. all this must be entered to centralize the media, it is necessary to introduce a bureau with military censorship, because, by the way, everything is united there, they have centralization there, and that's it. i do not operate centrally. we do supreme to

command what we are called to take advantage of. they did it. they are stealing ter. they have a patriotic war there. not we have them at the headquarters of the supreme, they have, uh, glorification of those who slaughter and kill civilians there. true, they are different there. well, but it doesn't matter. i don't live with comfortable conditions, of course, that is, what you are talking about, it's because again, you need to decide on an approach to that, and this is not about words. this is about approaches, because the format is an approach. and how would the complex decide, yes, they have already decided. just look, because in fact, uh, it's not about terms, but content. well, what we are doing, because even what you just started saying that you need to put things in order, look, because if this is a special military operation, then in theory, like a special military operation. she it can and most likely should be in the information space, as closed as possible with minimal, so to speak, involvement of society, there is news and

so on and so forth, but at the moment we have it from the first day. acquired the character of the people and then the question arises. can there be a people's special military operation, or is it a people's or patriotic war? and then this is one approach, then, it means that everyone is discussing this. everyone writes everything there is something or it is a special military operation, and then it is very rigid other frameworks. and we, as it were, are not very good yet, and not very different, moreover, you wanted to add something. no, firstly, one does not interfere with the other. here. i told you that a special military operation can run its course. uh, hinders hinders, that's just the point, what hinders, if there is no strict administrative framework, then yes. if the administrative framework is relaxed a little, then no, this is a plus, but to put things in order. it should have been for 2007. alexey is right. right now we need to save the situation. you see, it's not yet that we saved is not like that, we fix it and you understand, it was necessary in 2007. and if there

were standing here, well, guests, well, some other, what is called a formation? they would say that it was necessary not to translate in the ninety-first year. to what to what to what, but we are where we are. we can only learn lessons and not repeat mistakes. especially since i started the program, and to the question of the scale of the challenges we face and most likely will rise again when we say that war has been declared on us. nothing in this there is nothing new about this here is the strategy of the anaconda loop, uh, strangling us around the entire perimeter, but only the lazy one has not spoken in the last many years there. but now that we have found ourselves in a situation of involvement in fairly active hostilities. it comes to the fore and we've talked over and over and written, what uh? here is the chain of conflicts. we are talking, so i started the program today with the words cell ukraine, on which an active story is now going on, yes, but there are many other cells. and

here's what's interesting to me, in my opinion. uh, it's important to discuss what is happening now on other cells, because today some things began to happen on one of them at night. and i ’m speaking very diplomatically now, because in general, all the news that came from there, given that in this case, as always, they come from both sides. and they are, as a rule, diametrically opposed. it’s very difficult to understand this very simply. well, it's easy for you, because you are old-timers in politics. and it's hard for me, because i'm a beginner presenter. that's in this sense, uh. we only know what's next tension and intensification of hostilities on the armenian-azerbaijani border, and not just karabakh, but precisely the armenian-azerbaijani border, because those villages that were affected tonight. e shelling. i am not going into a discussion of the reasons now, each side presents

its own version. why this happened, nevertheless, is located on the territory of armenia further, i have a question. now i will ask it to everyone, what do you think about it. we need to perceive what is happening as some kind of local outbreak of a long-standing conflict or as some link in a certain chain and events that we are discussing. i'm only talking about the fact that, probably, it was absolutely coincidental that just these days i came to one of the countries involved in this conflict, and the person who is engaged in kavz in the state department. and here, to the question of wording, it so coincided that yes, the chief adviser of the state department, arrived in the caucasus, and in azerbaijan because of the situation on the border. it's always about wording. he arrived because of the aggravation or the aggravation is connected with his arrival. here, actually and a question. well, let's start with you later. yes, i would like to say that, of course, the events in the caucasus have their own history, their own logic and their own

self-development, but to say that they are absolutely not interconnected with what is happening now in ukraine would also be completely and untrue obviously what happened in the caucasus in 2 years ago, azerbaijan took over with the support of turkey. revenge has achieved its goal when it comes to reclaiming territory. he went even further than he could have imagined. this happened for a variety of reasons. one of which, including the internal situation in armenia, where internal tasks for politicians, armenia turned out to be more important than external national interests. this happened in armenia now, not a very popular government will speak directly, but the next question is when we say that we do not want to name. and who, in fact, we find ourselves in a situation. olya the one that was hit by the magotek, who says we don’t know who is shooting at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant about what i check uh, when the whole thing is actually officially, the official talk is that, allegedly

in response to the nomination, which was made by the armenian soldiers, shelling began, in which dozens of armenian soldiers died, 49 - this is what pashinyan called in the morning, when a temporary stop was reached, but again it is talking what we are talking about is that azerbaijan , with the support of turkey, is trying, as quickly as possible, to extract as much benefit as possible from the military diplomatic defeat that armenia and karabakh suffered 2 years ago. they achieve beneficial to them. in the wild then began a treaty beneficial to them called a peace treaty, but at the same time, what is the point of a peace treaty to refuse any support from armenia to the armenians of nagorno- karabakh and admit that there is no such problem. here it was 20 years old, 30 years all the time for dozens of years, and now it is gone, there is not even nagorno-karabakh itself . just karabakh, as he claims. now the leaders of azerbaijan, who generally exclude the word on the mountain, and it is clear that this is being done at

a time when it is believed that russia is bogged down in ukraine needs a military-political ally of armenia, by the way. we are members of the same organization, the dkb has a second bank brought today in a state of combat readiness. it is clear that they understand that we are now very dependent on trade routes through turkey, on its cooperation with turkey, and so on and so forth. they seize the moment, they seize the moment. this should be clear. we don't want to open a second front, but the question is how far are they going to go and how long are we going to endure such a test question, uh, which you have indicated is the most important one, that we do not want to open a second front; the question is whether one of those on whom, probably, he can depend on, wants to open it. whether it will open or not, and in this sense, returning to the visit of the adviser on the caucasus to azerbaijan, this is very interesting news. they brought me just now, which they brought, uh, which

allows you to look at it in a new way. ah, blinkin made an interesting statement, to be honest, rather unexpected for me, blinken said that the united states would consider it a positive step to promote russia's termination of youth was carried between armenia and azerbaijan you can say so, sarcastically grin and say that this is a good mine in a bad game, and so on, but nevertheless he said it. well, you must understand what the americans say. it doesn't mean they do it. in politics, in general, there is quite a lot of this situation here. all the same, sooner or later it was aggravated, it is clear, because the tripartite agreement that was concluded after the end of forty-four days of hostilities. it did not satisfy any of the not azerbaijani or armenian sides, because both sides believed that, and everything ended, er, with defeat for them, but the most

interesting thing is that i work. yes they satisfied enough celebrating victory suits. you understand, nagorno-karabakh was not under them. the fact is that this set in karabakh has always been a bone of contention. uh, armenia for 30 years. so he did not recognize his status could not. azerbaijan does not need this status. now our peacekeepers are standing in nagorno-karabakh yes, which our military base is provided, the second portion, they ensure the safety of life and the historical heritage, which is proved by the fact that the armenians lived there for several, hundreds of years, what am i leading this from your point of view, is it some kind of local outbreak or is it some kind of the part that they are leading, where our peacekeepers are standing transnistria in abkhazia south ossetia, we were able to solve these in an original way. why not take advantage here? but what is happening here now is an attempt to open a second front, because whose attempt an attempt by those who are waging war with us in ukraine

because of many of the events that took place in the forty-four-day war. i’ll tell you that 5 million accounts were opened, from which it means that they broadcast to armenia that the armenian army is the strongest of all, and then they blamed russia for everything, so all 5 million accounts were opened. armenia, on the resources that are now, is trying to sow panic in our population. the same customers are the same customers, that is, they are interested. here again, here it is, so that this conflict flares up, if azerbaijan was so sure of its victory everything. why did he say they are who you are? name who are they? well, let's have a common concept they call anglo-saxon. got it. i think that this is a very approximate and inaccurate estimate, because , firstly, the english. secondly, the saxon in england has its own role here. it is somewhat different from the american one historically and i can say that, probably, there are some ears that

are behind turkish claims, but there is turkey's interest. turkey wants to open transport corridors that would lead it directly without any intermediaries to the caspian sea. it wants central asia . azerbaijan wants a peace treaty to be signed, dictated by azerbaijan, on which not only the border line. only in karabakh in general, where does karabakh not exist at all? there is no problem, there is no karabakh, the herds need to be granted status. this is what they want, this aggravation, by the way, did not happen where our peacekeepers are not on the territory of nagorno-karabakh, but on the other border, yes, and this is a very important factor in in fact, because it is most likely that turkey is trying to distract from the conflict with greece, which flares up periodically and to which we have already discussed. uh huh, if you notice, then a week ago he again went into the actual hot hot phase. and apparently, turkey is simply delaying, but another thing is a completely right colleague regarding what is being decided here in this tangle, a huge number of problems and tasks are being solved. first of all, if they are

well aware that russia is not easy to open there is a second front. so there will be an open third. if needed in kazakhstan in the same e, and this, maybe some other region, and so on, fronts will open. exactly until the moment when we were not impressed, the fighting spirit. that's but i think that digress. it's not worth, uh, then a situation that is now being used against. it is now used rather against turkey than against e-armenia or e-russia, in my opinion, and another important point, if a patented liar, blinkin says something that russia is not there if they hope that russia will fit in, or rather, guarantee security, and so on, then this means exactly the opposite meaning. that is why the chief adviser to the state department arrived in kavka. e in azerbaijan in order to just stimulate from azerbaijan so that it continues this situation. for me, this is primarily connected, in my opinion, just with greece, not with ukraine, even

in situations. i just want to say that he came and always came for one thing for the sake of attracting attention. so the decisive force here not to russia but to america and armenia and azerbaijan , do you think that he is specially provoking? he says the war between armenia, only we can stop, i see. that's all, of course. so in that sense, you're translating blinkin's words about what they would consider a positive step. they say, come on russia, exactly the opposite meaning. let's show russia to us. what you can do and you ca n't do anything. that's why we will go out. time will tell, we will monitor this situation, but now do not switch advertising on channel one, we will continue. lost card has a credit we will be looking for 145 days without interest on everything renaissance credit bank of all possible three components enhances

each other's action against spasms and pain on a vegan, no matter how the head hurts. what helps me strengthen immunity in the cold season new vitrum immunoktiv has even more selenium, zinc and vitamin c, the formula is enhanced with beta-glucoins that help activate immunity everything for health in a unique complex of vitamins and minerals new vitrum and nails, maximum for strong immunity. now many put life on pause due to rising prices with sovcombank credit make important purchases at today's prices and the keys back all your plans sovcombank

people are important children need. well, a lot for happiness , a grass grinder, bushes, mud baths, ancient arte's designer outfit take advantage of payments at the birth of a child as part of the national demography project attacks influenza and sars viruses already 2 hours after taking action on the cause of the disease at the base. start treatment on time protect yourself and loved ones vtb team ogo fast store expanded which business we help show, they say how cute, and the rate on an express loan for business is cute and attractive and up to ten million rubles without guarantors and collateral approval online in just 5 minutes by a reliable bank always quickly vtb help with

business. boost your tariff with beeline sappers, connect your loved ones to the tariff at half price, watch videos endlessly and for free or get more internet in roaming without additional payments beeline 30 years on your side new in the artra cream line arthroxicam three-component composition promotes accelerated penetration of components beyond pain chat with modern painkillers, the maximum concentration of arthroxicam for accelerated penetration. lever, happiness hurts. choose us by the shore mega sale only from september 12th to 26th. buy a universal washing gel for synergists for only 899 rubles. sber megamarket will be on a train run today, if the level of iron is in order for everything and the strength and energy of easily accessible iron is a whiffer, whiffer, everything

will come true iron and this is about you when you have a runny nose again and again interferes with the plan. use aqualor ocean water spray calcium and magnesium ions from ocean water help clear the nasal cavity. and return comfortable breathing. aqualor breathe the energy of the ocean. this is lena, not only that she found the apartment of her dreams, she completed all the necessary documents for the purchase. and now she has become the owner of a nine-story apartment near the park, because the apartment is now being bought on m2.ru. we continue to work live. we are in the first two parts talking about the fact that, well, many in any

case about it is said that after many action statements. the curators of the ukrainians connected with the topics and events at the front with the fact that they were preparing and do not hide it, that they were preparing these divisions of theirs and that they will continue their non-division brigade, that they will continue to train them. and what about us they are going to overlay and overlay and overlay. we say that our formats should probably already be supplemented in some way with some more, er, set of tougher actions, realizing that war has actually been declared on us. more precisely, it was before us that you understood that it was of volume, but now, as it were, they have already completely warned that the guys, this is a frank war , yes, in a more frank form and with the wording that, well, a war of annihilation, that is, roughly speaking, if you do not win, then you roughly speaking kirdy at the same time. uh, as speaking, that's what they are talking about. they are their plans for conditional military operations of the american e using ukrainian infantry and mercenaries. they associate with

the fact that here they are effective terms. uh, counterattacks are linked to the first snow. e with gas and so on and something like that, that is, in this whole story, there is no war or, after all, a special operation, but this gas, uh, economic history, it is present moreover, we see that it works as an important factor in their internal, let's say such such vibration. eh, we can't, how far can we go and how much can we endure? here is some interesting information, the guardian published today on this subject, please. according to the document that came into our possession, the european commission refuses to limit prices for russian gas, but insists on introducing additional tax on excess profits of energy companies final text. the documents are still subject to change, but it shows the european commission's doubts about getting enough support from member states, the eu to

set a price ceiling for russian gas. we see that our potential opponents. inside there, as if at home, well, it vibrates about the necessary rigidity and apparently a margin of safety in this matter , moreover, cnn says that there are some doubts whether they will rise, which means that the risk is a question e split in europe is real citizens in the eu can rebel against the strategy of economic isolation and so on. that is, they also somehow vibrate about this, and in this sense, konstantin vasilyevich to you as a specialist in this field, and in this spectrum of ours, we will call it opposition for now, or it should be called something else and change approaches, because you remember, before my vacation, you gave me your book, which is called the big gas game, when i remembered it today and spoke to my editor. find me here, as if the cover, so that i showed, i told them, in my opinion, it was called the great gas war. they started looking for no, then there was the game. i actually have the

first question for you, given everything i started with on channel one, it's a big game. basically. we should we should still continue the great gas game, given that they are vibrating, that they are complexities or maybe already considering that we have been declared war to move on to the great gas war. thank you for reading or viewing this book. in fact, this book was written before these events, but it is dedicated to a very simple thing. she talks about the fact that for all 50 years of our gas relations with the european union, the united states did everything to prevent these relations from taking place at the beginning, and then they were destroyed, that is, for all 50 years, the united states fought politically and in all possible ways with supplies. e of russian gas. by the way, this is one of the arguments that i cite in

discussions on whether or not to cut off gas supplies. i'm talking about what's in the gas sphere is the dream of the united states itself, which has been waiting for this for 50 years and is doing everything for the european union. ah, went for it on my own. they push it against the wall, leaving them no choice and what we have seen in the last 30 years in european politics is the change of the elite , the emergence of brussels as an independent institution. look who is now coming up with the ideas of the mechanism of the same price-glue marginal prices. and all this was also part of this biggest game, which led. uh, in fact, to such results in the gas sector, so my thesis i i repeat, and lies in the fact that the cessation of supplies on our part will be a victory for the united states. strange as it may seem. this is the plan they are trying to implement. they have

political interests in this. they have a direct economic interest in this at the rate of their liquid gas about it. uh, everyone knows. and by the way, it was 50 years ago, only then there was no liquefied gas, but there was american coal, which was displaced by soviet gas, americans, there is always an economic interest that they pursue next moment. uh, moving on to europe let's uh let's, let's be honest. uh, now, if we deliver the ultimatum that you were talking about, uh, i'm asking quoted quoted, let's say the europeans. uh, stop supporting ukraine or we will cut off your gas supplies. how do you think the europeans will respond? i think that it is an extremely, naive point of view that we can seriously count on the fact that with such a frontal, e blackmail, we will be able to stop supporting ukraine. ugh , that's not going to happen. that is you there plan this the ultimatum will not be accepted, and so, frankly , uh, if you know this, the ultimatum will not be accepted. why put it forward? why do it? and i’m

a representative of vasilievich for a second, and i understand your logic, but there is a parallel other logic and asks a lot of questions about it, that they don’t hide the very europeans who are one of the tools of the americans in the fight, but with us with the strangulation of our economy and etc. they do not hide that they are going possibly in september. when they get more comfortable on their own close that valve. you see, there is a question. we will not do it now, because we understand that it will not be our way. they tell us , yes, yes, no need to cover now. we then, when it is convenient for us, we will do it ourselves and it turns out like this. in my opinion, amateurish such tsuk swang some. yes, i understand what you are talking about, you are talking about the public position of the europeans, who offers to help them spend the winter, and then refuse to supply , you constantly declare that the point of no return is already

passed, but uh, maybe. of course, i am a naive person, but i still think that this point has not been passed and what scholz says, what scholz says and what the word fondone says, you see, they speak on behalf of the european union for the next 50 years . they took upon themselves the right to talk about what will happen to the european union. uh, in the next half century they're sure. the fact that they are trendsetters today. how long will scholz last as chancellor of germany, what will happen to him in a year, how many prime ministers, uh, are already in europe retired? and so if you still think that e really our economic relations are finally destroyed with the european union. well, then it’s probably really worth cutting off this gas ourselves, but i’m just saying why, it seems to me, many of us are convinced that if we cut off these supplies, then in europe there will be a million corpses frozen on the streets. there

, the economy will be destroyed and europe will be destroyed, and yes, the european court will almost fall apart in january, this will not happen. while europe is inflicting colossal damage, colossal economic damage. that's what we're trying to tell them about, and there's more in my opinion. there are people left who are ready to hear it, as if it seems to us, perhaps many, that it is already impossible to talk with them all the time. well, i personally think that these ultimatums are so frontal, they only worsen this situation for us. this seems like a simple solution. i even keep quiet. in this case, how much money does the country make on the remaining even supplies at new prices. i even consider this argument not the most important. although i i think it is also important, because when we talk about the war, we must also keep in mind the potential of our economy. especially about the long war. how long can we stand if we make rash economic decisions, because it’s very easy to talk, but let’s start talking about the economy there, uh, we will send everyone to the front there, but

we will close the entire male population, we will send there, no one said, this task and how much and how long the country will last with this approach, i believe so and i hear such things. it's good that you don't say, but a number of people say and think so, so now, uh, it’s very dangerous if we also start making some ill-conceived feverish decisions that will weaken us on the same economic front, and i yes i am so here is such an ultimatum overlap on our side of the gas supply, it will be an ill-conceived decision that will bring us more problems today. understood? yes, i just want to say that i perfectly understand your logic. we want to make money and money is not the best thing for us. the main thing, i already said, but here there is also a certain line, which you must also imagine. and how does this differ from the supply of military equipment. here we have buyers, we can supply tanks to ukraine, we can deliver to europe. we can go somewhere else, if

there is a demand, why limit yourself? so what if they are at war with us, but we earn money. you understand, there is also some kind of final logic here, you also need to imagine it. look, well, natural gas isn't used, but natural gas is used everywhere. and you know this very well in any production that leads to tanks, aircraft and everything else. you know this very well, and let's not obscure anything here. in fact, in different points of view. we supplied everything else to ukraine and oil until the very last moment. and now gas flows in a wonderful way through ukraine in europe, yes. well, how does this correlate with the fact that we are conducting military operations there, then what concerns our behavior, but in fact, we are on the same sides. we are acting, in fact. this is correct with both hands. we show the edge on one side and say that we can stop on the other side. we won't stop. and what happens to the northern stream? do you really

think that seeds don't know how to build turbines? we are clearly showing the europeans what will happen to them if we stop something, and here we come to some kind of crescendo sooner or later. we will approach it, it is brewing, or we need to block or we need to trade. and what they indeed 50 100 years 200 years they want to replace us in this market. yes definitely a dispute no from the very beginning, of course. and i can ask you a question, of course. but tell me, if we don’t have economic relations with the european union , what kind of relations will we have ? you answer with european productions, if you ask a question, yes, you ask in the spirit in the film foundling do you want baby to the dacha or so that your head comes off to fight with the entire european union, who spoke about it, and the european union to report, in fact, they are not a single whole, in fact, if you look

a little deeper, i'm for it to share for finding hungary in it to find other countries of hungary can be delivered yes, understandable. yes, understandable, understandable. yes, andrei arkach, well, in fact, what we are talking about in this confrontation and in the military and economic and political and any number of all sorts edges about which it is possible. well, a lot of points. you probably have your own, with which you look at your lessons, which you probably learned and in general from the latest events of the last days, please. you know, if we talk about my personal lessons, they ended around 2009, when the european union finally refused to conclude a strategic partnership agreement with the russian federation so that no one would have any doubts and so on. they used us tactically and all these stories. just showed up today. here. uh, now mr. chizhov is returning from his seventeen

years of service. right there in brussels and we ate a lot of salt together. and all these conversations were talking. so now they have closed their eyes and ears to such an extent that they have forbidden to let, for example, into the european parliament, any lobbyists who are in any way connected with firms of their firms not ours, who deal with russia, that is, there specially now uh, such a curtain is hung and not only informational, but as before, there are 2,500 american catchers, it seems, but, and a little remarque, here's to the previous dispute, today's current leaders of the current european union is to do the question of whether it will remain the same forever, and so on, you need to tear and cut or a second again, yes, 2009, there were other leaders. these bricks at the foundation had already been laid, you understand, at the same time that the eastern partnership appeared. here is your obedient servant and in brussels and extrasburg many times said the eastern partnership will lead to

civil war in ukraine a year is here, that is, everything that we have seen today. yes, i and some of my colleagues saw it a long time ago, so it’s not a question here, there are tactical mistakes of someone specific . needed, a geo-economic competitor, but they do not just kill him as a geo-economic competitor. they also use his assassination, that is, they force them to commit economic suicide by engaging in a clinch with us. that's what happening. today, what other lessons have become obvious to you today or something has been revealed? what did you do before ? who hears me to give up any illusions from any illusions, as it will not be before, if we agree to all their conditions, it will be even worse for us if we force them to

act, well, given our national interests it is not a fact that they will take a break there, they will not take up the old ones, so here we must consider this situation as a necessity, a complete and final victory of the russian federation for all. so to speak, the directions available to us as much as possible, so to speak, well, a reasonable time. that, in fact, is all. by what methods this will be achieved depends on the specific direction of a particular area. ugh got it. well, here you say that e achievement of victory yes, but this does not mean the destruction of god deliver. it will start now interpret. so, that's exactly what i wanted to ask, and when you say, about victory, what do you mean victory over that which will be expressed in what? well, you know, if we talk now in the european union, then naturally, you have to understand and remember me. i hope everyone understands well that this is after all a group of countries that, by mutual agreement, has begun to do

certain things. yes, but still it is still a group of countries and an effect. uh, this one, when each of these countries begins to think about their own national interests, it is already working, and that's the confusion that i see today in communicating with our counterparts, so to speak, to this day, everyone we still meet. uh, it ’s confusion written right on their face, and they are actually the wisest of them understand that they still need to somehow get out of this story. by the way, all of them, all of them with whom i met, at least understand that it is impossible to do this through the brussels bureaucracy. we just need to stop contacts at this level, except for those that he we desperately need here and now, that's all. clear. the situation is changing not only in the area of ​​conducting a special military operation; it is changing in europe. quite right. and it really can be used. you have to wait for the assembly and the pipes of your enemy will be carried past you in a beautiful lacquered coffin. but uh, in fact, u wars are won and conflicts are won. uh, the political military

is not won that way. uh, some countries can afford it. this is preliminary, by concentrating your hands, or a very serious base, or production base, and so on, and then they can really observe the course of events in a rather abstract way and expect the desired effect. unfortunately, russia has not chosen very well for itself. uh, we could, in principle, uh, do it this way at some point, but we just, in my opinion, were not allowed to do even better, because russia has always been in very contradictory relations with the east and west, with the south somewhere even with the north. i mean northern europe, but i always found a way out. and it seems to me that u break ties. uh, iron curtains and so on. this is not the way out. this is just an attempt. expect the death of the enemy, naturally , either the shah or the padishah. yeah but we just don't have time to wait and at this stage. uh, we need to use all the resources

to ensure that all the resources of interaction with europe from the states, even if they do not want it, and with the east and with the west, and so on, in order to formulate an ideology of mutual existence 1 a second before it happens. unfortunately, we are doomed to respond to blows from different sides, they don’t understand, they just attack at all. when you say the word europe, you must understand, do you mean the european union, or do you mean the countries that i mean the european countries with which we have established bilateral very serious relations to the european court - this is a separate bureaucratic atlantic organization that is absolutely hostile towards russia. i don't mean brussels well , which still exists objectively for a long time and which last for some time, and not the fact that a lot. there are just stupid corrupt officials. the era of dinosaurs is quite yes, from the point of view of the era of dinosaurs, it is generally incomprehensible. what are we talking about. this is all very desirable. there in brussels are concentrated stupid corrupt

officials who, because of their stupidity. they just do what they are told. uh, outside from across the lake from the ocean. i mean more and more. they don't do anything. and they do not command anything by and large. no, it's okay to shit on them. they do not know how to accept the sanctions package. they go to competitions in nasty things there. well, in conclusion, or, as it were, a backdrop for what we were talking about here and arguing, just literally 20 minutes ago, a message came that russian president vladimir putin and german chancellor olafsholz were the same germany that supplies weapons that well, and much more , which held telephone conversations that lasted 90 minutes the topic was the situation in ukraine, including the situation at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, and this is information, which the german government has so far reported, and officially the press service of the president of russia, our insurance of what the conversation was about and on what

occasion it took place, and that it is always very important who was the initiator, and does not give. a, but according to the information on the kremlin website for the last time. they talked at the end of may by phone. this is an indicator that, well, something is happening anyway. and, probably, it should be happening, and i just against this background. i want to end by saying that i absolutely agree that we need to continue to get rid of a lot of illusions. many of which are rooted in us already at the end of the eighties , this is true, but we also need to get rid of extremes and other opposites of this, we first fell into the illusion that everyone was waiting for us there, and we should hug everyone, kiss and open our arms to everyone. and so, the main thing is not to fall into the opposite illusion that we need to tear everything up and shut everything down and, as it were, puppet ourselves. here, as if any extremes. it seems to me harmful information channel on the first with you olesya loseva anatoly kuzichev. time

will show. let's start right away, but let's start by turning on the direct inclusion of alexander khodakovsky, the founder of the brigade. vostoka alexander sergeevich hello. thanks for visiting us. listen to us alexander sergeevich yes good afternoon alexander sergeevich, we are waiting for a summary from you. uh, on the front. what is the situation? what situation am i asking? with that, i don’t accumulate twists at the address, i deal with specific tasks there in general, it’s clear there, yes, that the situation is in different areas, it is invested differently where we have recently been static state. well, we are, as it were, standing in this uletarian direction of the great analyselkovsky direction. here is the donetsk arc. e, in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe direction in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bmajorskoye in the direction of bakhnuto, some kind of slow and insignificant pace of advance continues in us, because the enemy is putting up quite serious resistance and there are losses on both sides, but nonetheless. we are moving in this specificity of our line of contact, that

nevertheless somewhere we continue to advance, where we we are preparing for some actions and actions, such as activation in general by the enemy, in particular. well, something like this is a great channel in the silkovo and observatory directions. we see that the enemy simply accumulates resources there and assume that we will definitely try to use it, because the general excitement was enough for him. he believes that he can try everywhere, so to speak. be active to achieve results, but in fact, in this southern direction, which i call southern relative to donetsk, we are taking measures to ensure that opponents meet effectively enough, as far as is concerned. the direction that we call the kharkiv direction, which now attracts the most attention, of course, the situation there is quite complicated. what is its characteristic in order to form, let's say, we do not have. e second tier. we're running a military-police operation, respectively. we have the only echelon that was in combat contact with the enemy. and when the enemy managed to formulate a resource, otherwise move our orders,

forcing them to adjust to move back. we needed to break, of course, the distance with the enemy in order to change, so to speak , stop, turn around and gain a foothold and meet the enemy. that is, the line is inhabited by the enemy. there is no need to stabilize and consolidate now, because he has the inertia of the offensive. he is moving and, accordingly, he is fully counting on the fact that we now do not have a resource in this direction in order to go on the counteroffensive. that is, he won't say so it does not divert attention and resources to burrowing to gain a foothold there. he keeps moving moving as the situation. there is still insufficiently stabilized formed boilers form. some kind of deportation environments are formed in situations when, through the ears, narrow isthmuses somewhere, there we continue to evacuate the direction of the raisins. there, our wounded e fight practically surrounded in separate insignificant areas. that is, uh, the situation. it 's still alive there. she has not yet reached the state stabilization. and in principle, our task now is

to gain a foothold, to stay on the lines we have reached, to which we retreated, and in some situations it is beyond, an annual barrier to the oskol river in some situations. we are still continuing. how to butt heads with the enemy, that is, in general, the situation there is still dynamic and until complete stabilization there. it is still far away, so we will change. let's just say the picture during this time. but you said about the inertia of the offensive, i wonder if she , well, obviously, she does not excise this inertia herself. they probably help her. let it dry out, so to speak. that 's about the inertia of the offensive. now, when it dries up and can dry up, it all depends on the degree of resistance, if we succeed, for example, if we are talking about ours, or rather, if it is about the inertia of the enemy’s offensive, then he will stop only when he considers that his resource has now come up , for example, offensive towards the end of this e, may be due to a number of considerations even. well, let's put it this way, if there is an illusion that we can

move even further, but we understand that we we break orders, that we break communications, that wedged too deeply. if in the territory of the enemy we can decide or the enemy can decide to stop otherwise to consolidate. well, there are some political considerations to promote this. hey, there's a lot going on right now. here with europe and other things that we also react to, we understand that we will say this to the enemy. we also accept the challenge and raise the bar, so to speak, we strike at the infrastructure of the enemy we show that we have not yet realized our full potential and that this is the first opportunity. yes, therefore everything depends on several, e subjunctives. and if, for example, we stop, we stand firm, then, of course, the enemy will understand that further advancement is fraught with consequences for him. but now the most important thing is to regroup and stop understood. here are many more, so to speak, there is a mention of krasny liman. i would like to hear from you if you

know what the situation is around it and in it in krasny liman well, this here is this knot, raisin red estuary. svyatogorsk - this is a very complex triangle. now we have, because on these frontiers the most bloody clashes are now taking place. and i'm talking about works. the so -called stories about the fact that there are now precedents, when we have to pull out our wounded from the semi-environment through a narrow isthmus, this is just the whole of the fact that now everything is as dynamic as possible, and we are now just approaching a situation where we need to think, such fishing we will stabilize, as for red lebanon, the latest information that the guys were holding on now, uh, here is online. i do not have any operational information about what is happening there. i hope that we will hold out as far as possible in the restrained situations. but you yourself understand that the resource, uh, we have enough limited resources there, so the options may be different. we must be ready for any development. it is clear you rule

absolutely. i say, a little to you is not right, that is not at the address. yes, i asked right away, so to speak, a summary so wide from all fronts. well, thank you, actually, what did you e that you gave her? however, they said that it is much clearer and easier for you to talk about your own tasks that you are solving, so to speak. well then, let's talk about your tasks that you are solving. well, as the last one in general, we understand that now this is their uh, their is their psycho-emotional state, which motivates them in some kind of movement those political tasks that were there before uh the government of ukraine when she made the decision to conduct a counteroffensive, all this together, as it were, pushes them to move on and move in different areas. naturally, we, having intelligence data. we see how the enemy transfers some resource to our direction. that is, we are not talking about the fact that stabilization is planned in the near future at some levels, we will be in the winter period. if the rainy season and so on, we are waiting there. ah, better times, there we wait for

spring, growth or something else. we see that the enemy preparing for some kind of offensive action. we have enough reason to believe that in the light of the general background, so to speak, on which the hostilities are taking place, the enemy will try to undertake. uh, some offensive actions in those areas that, due to priority plus , we know that there are still recently, for example, it was one and a half to two weeks ago before the events in the kharkov direction, mobilized from the enemy went to our advanced positions found a way when i designate myself so that they are not they shot them and asked us to reduce the intensity of hostilities in the children's room. he talks about the fact that they have families there, that they are being driven forward and so on. well, that is, such signs were quite demoralizing. yes, and we recorded it all. it is clear that nothing depended on them from these mobilized, because the experts stand on two and naturally they determine the weather there today, now the enemy. and now it's four three four last days. we have become very active . that's because it uses those means

which he had not recently used, begins to heat up, drive out the equipment directly, aiming to work as tanks. that is now just half an hour ago. i received information that the enemy struck at one of our positions in the coal sector and defeated four people there, received a heavy concussion, because such a massive artillery strike was inflicted and moreover, concentrated at one point, moreover, with the name of the cannon and artillery barrel artillery , and one person died and from our fighters. that is, the general background is such that the enemy has been activated already in the last 3 days. we already had two night sorties from the enemy, when he tried to push through our defenses, but faced resistance and each time retreated with losses. our positions, as if responsible for the night's losses. that is , it turns out that the activation on the face plus the accumulation of some resource is also confirmed all sources. here is the external, so to speak, e

intelligence before undercover intelligence, that is, the conclusions in the past are unambiguous, if we do not take appropriate measures now. if you don’t take money, you don’t see that well, you meet him and don’t let him pass through in our order, then the enemy will still try to probe our defenses and test us at large, so we are preparing for this, so to speak, and will try to force as much as possible, because all the time we lived in the inertia of the offensive. now we have to think about what i'm talking about defense many give credit to the enemy. he has learned to transfer some resources from site to site and is trying, let's say, to create or implement. it's the so-called tactic there with a stop cutter, as they call it, in various places to strike some kind of blows there that make us react in some way. that is, for the time being it must be admitted that the enemy has temporarily seized the initiative. well, war is such a thing. in 5 months, without significantly increasing our resources, we took control of 25% of the territory

control, in fact, the black sea and made the sea of ​​​​azov our inland sea, so, of course, we are carrying out this task, we have suffered a certain load , and the pro have weakened our potential, now there is such a phase, when we need to regroup, and we need to prepare for the next company. well, this, of course, is a war and no one promised that we would go all the time, ahead of victory by car. moreover , no one promised that it would be easy, on the contrary, everyone, including myself, promised that it would be difficult and very difficult, given, so to speak, that goal here here is the task that we have set for ourselves, and here are the goals of the tasks that our opponents have set for themselves. and it's not even ukraine about it. we will talk a little later in our program alexander sergeyevich thank you very much alexander khodokovsky was in direct contact with us, the founder of the brigade, east i just want to say that they are now turning to numerous experts , yes, yes, they were there the day before yesterday, so say experts, famous virologists and so on. now they are military experts. i just want to draw their attention. so to say, dear and professional, that alexander edakovsky is also right, saying that in fact we, with the help of

a very limited contingent of a very limited contingent, practically took control, there is a huge 20% of the country's territory. huge country and so on, therefore, when you start there say howl whine and rush about. you, please, also keep this aspect in mind. he 's pretty substantial dear. experts immediately somehow want to say that kutuzov and zhukov lucky in their time there was no twitter telegram from social networks, like a short advertisement on the first vtb team wow fast store expanded at the speed of an express loan from vtb said i want to expand online approval in just 5 minutes and up to ten million rubles without guarantors and vtb collateral we help with business you can never have too many jeans in the bathroom old jeans with a 50% discount. this is an advertisement for the drug kagocel without exaggeration and double

meanings. after all, from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of flu symptoms and arvi, regardless of the type of virus, helps to reduce the duration of the disease, therefore kagocel is the highest antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them at the drugstore while i'm up with the investment. these are investment ideas for any situation, zero commission for the purchase of securities, a favorable exchange rate, a convenient application, and another 27 years of experience in six crises passed by more than a thousand financial advisers. well, number one on the market and only three letters b k c world investment bcs press want to grab a sale on ozone for only 9 rubles. multifurnace simfer for 1999 rubles. it

is in the application or at the cash desks of the supermarket super prize from 100 million rubles. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with a loan from sovcombank make important purchases at today's prices and turn all your plans back on sovcombank people are more important to meet two titans tele2 and xiaomi they give a new meaning, you can change minutes for a discount and it is profitable to buy xiaomi smartphones any minute is equal to two rubles such in the whole world for the first time. and if i'm not your subscriber yet, time is equal to money, wisdom for centuries, a discount on xiaomi smartphones per minute tele2 other magnet rules buy cheaper milk, condensed rogachev 1199 more discounts in

the magnet mobile application. how to treat a cold rafamin an innovative drug for the treatment of respiratory tract infections and the prevention of bacterial complications has a single antiviral and antibacterial action naro-fomin allows you to return to normal life against viruses against bacteria strength in unity of action. i want to become a sale on ozone soon, but now weasel washing gel for 799 rubles. and up to 50% discounts on grain coffee egoist is lena, not only that she found her dream apartment, she completed all the necessary documents for the purchase. and now she has become the owner of an apartment in a

nine-story building near the park, because the apartment is now being bought on m2.ru, if you did not find tickets for your favorite stoloto lotteries at post offices. they are always available in stoloton branded stores and on the website in september only at stoloto branded outlets get a ticket as a gift hc already from the first day of admission begins to reduce the severity of the symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus, so kagocel is a higher antiviral measure and a pharmacy will help to cope. pharmacy cashback up to 20% throughout september, despite the fact that ukraine is still not accepted into nato, but only promised, nato has already mastered ukraine and is fighting in ukraine not only by ukrainians, but also with their own hands , they are already talking about it without hesitation, everyone writes about it and the publication in the build, however, like the foreign

the mercenaries who are fighting, supposedly for a free ukraine, are actually for the interests of the united states of america and for their hegemony, they are no longer embarrassed by what is happening and are actively posting their videos on the internet. soon these will be the ukrainians, of course, probably, i am absolutely convinced that there is a completely regular military, they are calmly fighting there. everyone is fighting. and in general, such an open secret is stupid, what they say, we are standing there from ukraine . are you laughing, or what? i would like to

say the gray-haired negro that we saw, well, rather, there he is not gray-haired, we do not know a gray-haired beard. it actually, look, he's kind of like a mercenary, yes, and he was an officer in the us navy, see the order of the bearer and so on, a famous person. he is such a military expert yes military. well, now they are fighting in ukraine, uh. vlad, we have long understood that just to say the expert analysis suggested that, of course, they would not back down. and that, of course, they will invest not only rhetoric and not only there some with limited supplies and supplies actually not limited. and also, uh, manpower, so to speak , and so on. but what's next? farther there will be more and more gray-haired blacks, and then they will certainly be gray-haired and black-arabs, and anyone , but you have to understand that war defines. they are not fighting with all their might, you know, all these guys. they

make up a few percent play a big role. they are where they train the reserve corps under the lion, where hundreds of such blacks and not only blacks train the ukrainian reserve brigades. it 's a lot more dangerous than this one that runs around filming itself. yes, therefore, what will happen next will continue. uh, very hopefully quick consciousness us, that from the situation when we said with such almost humor that we were fighting against an enemy who outnumbered us in many ways on a technically inferior and incapable of fighting enemy, that we now begin to fight with an enemy who still outnumbers us, but all better equipped. technically equipped with uh-huh and managed by quite, uh, professional commanders and command. and this means that we need to change very quickly and effectively, because if we

don't do it. here again, in what aside, for example, khodakovsky is speaking today. eh, here, as if in fact he says something that everyone knows, but now he said frankly for the first time that we have not had any second echelon for all these all these months. you understand what it means there is no second , in fact, it was a military-police operation. yes, this means that if you have broken through the first echelon , then you can’t really do anything further, you need to pull off so. from anywhere. you have at least something to expose, other sectors of the front, shifting to those guys who are there, uh, sort of to protect them and try to compensate, of course, now there are reserves. here in this case. i don't quite agree with him. i just know wait. please excuse the presence or absence of a healthy echelon. this is a question. so to speak, i don’t know quantitatively, that is, how many resources or conceptually, if you have such an operation, it’s counter-talistic there - this one last 2 weeks showed that for the previous eight and a half months ukraine was throwing

cannon fodder at the front. that is, she threw, uh, in fire, untrained personnel, whose task was simply to keep our people in place at the cost of their lives. only now it's going on for this time. they prepared only one corps in their rear. well, this is a large unit, there are about 30,000 soldiers who are well trained. we see that they are armed with heavy weapons exclusively nato. and there is no longer our technology. it's already there for the most part. soviet technology ended back, low whatever, uh, and uh, this corps, it cost all those thousands that were simply called, so the mechanical increase is working, we have to outplay ukraine by creating an even bigger training system to attract people there, because really, just, uh, mobilize to put people in boots. there in the forty-third year of the tale and the rifle sends we must create absolutely motivated reserves. very well prepared very well

equipped and very well trained. and for this it is necessary. indeed, this is finally done by re-consciousness, understandable, right? well, in part, of course. also done by volunteers. yes? well, of course, i agree, it is necessary to increase, because because we are fighting there. eh, you know, once, when some of the specialists there, at the very beginning they said that we would throw hats on them there in the same studio. you and i told the guys with hats will not work, because there are also not fools on the other side. speaking of mercenaries. and they say that here in the kharkov direction. uh, they were noticed, and people speak arabic and turkish. uh, just well-known pmcs with whom our guys in syria fought. they have already shown up there. that is, these guys are there for the first time, by the way, during the operation, and there, an appearance with an arab was recorded. and turkish things, well, you know , of course, two points that attract attention. well , firstly, since they can’t do without mercenaries there, it means that it’s still the case, they are not as good as they would like, sorry yur now

wait, if not just they can’t. let's ladies listen on at all there listen. uh, a fragment of an interview with zelensky cnn, everything is already simple there. here it is that's what i'm as, so to speak, a hypothesis, there is an assumption or we understand it, what is happening offered our visual respect. zelensky confirms. thank him, listen. the country that gave the most aid to ukraine usa yes don't you worry that aid to the usa could be reduced or completely stopped if the republicans gain control of the house of representatives, where the money comes from, and what could be your message that you want to convey to the republicans ? yes usa leaders in terms of support for ukraine, without them we will not be able to return our land. at first i thought it was some kind of humorous video. yes, a quarter of the nineties, of course, but nonetheless. look yes, it's just an american snane tv channel. here

is such a reality such people such statements this topic is confirmed. actually, really. if everything was fine with them with mobilization with people in-laws. well, you wouldn’t have to throw them at the front line, especially during the offensive in the forefront of militants from the west, usually uh, well, how they say the problems of the indians of the sheriff are not particularly worried, and then the sheriffs themselves began to be thrown there. yeah, this is an important moment and you know the guys, but no matter what anyone says, we all perfectly understand that we have to go through certain moments in this battle. eh, in order to, probably, realize something and understand something, i have already written several materials about this, that obviously the lord wants us to understand something, and a to think about something. uh, so that the victory that it will undoubtedly be. e, that is, after all, the optina elders said that a russian ship was there again. let it be uh, sail on the waves. eh, it's a well-known prophecy, and therefore, of course, but when it happens, you and i must remember the state that we're going through today, which we were going through there six months ago, when there were certain problems. there are some tasks at the front.

yes, but this is the bitterness of the fact that everything does not work right away. she must stay with us so that when we win, so that we remember this, because then you know when you are in victory, when you have a lot of joy you forget a lot. no , we must remember at what cost this victory is won . how much do you have to go through? what difficulties to endure, so that as a result? run well, to create, but it would be easy, well, once anu came, that's it, fools, kicked out there. all won. no, guys, nothing happens, it will not work, of course, patience. and, of course, there is also the humility of pride, because after all, when we say that we are yes, we are ladies. yes we are no, let's still not forget that there is still the providence of god, the lord god, too should help. give him such an opportunity absolutely you are talking about the help of the lord god and zelensky does not turn to god he turns to the united states. we saw and every day he does it and the states. so they hear his calls, and announce a new package of assistance to ukraine this week, another statement should be made by washington washington is also discussing the possibility

of providing kiev with air defense systems and fighter jets in the medium long term. here's what the fine shell times says the us department of defense said that washington and its allies are discussing the possibility of providing kiev with air defenses and fighter jets in the medium long term. to date, the us and its allies have refused to do this, so far, of course, they refused, but uh, well, because of this they remembered the rhetoric they remembered the rhetoric . uh, marto's rhetoric , for example, yes, americans every word. here we forgive weighed. uh, they were afraid to say something so to say, not like that, which, of course, we do not approve of. of course, we support, however well and etc. right now there are none. however, now, in general, all all taboos, so to speak, are discarded. now everything, now everything is possible, so i'm telling you, they simply forgot something there, because they left a word there, until, of course, they will supply everything that they can supply, they will

fight against us, there are two dozen countries against nato is fighting us and there is no need for any illusions, so to speak, so feed the occasion. if it's like that, if it's what it's called, eh? disconnect from tubes. yes, it is clear that he will collapse right away, but there are so many tubes, they are so sewn on, so to speak, to this body to this zombie that, by the way, it works, it works. well, yes, you can say that, please know. uh, it's just , well, now they stop calling a spade a spade, which, in fact, with an official war, an operation, is in the nature of the third world war. indeed, more than twenty countries are fighting against us correctly, and in a different way. it is impossible to designate it taking into account the scale and remember the beginning of the special operation and the americans and european countries, practically did everything possible to deny the presence of mercenaries. and they said about it that we don’t have anyone coming or going. no, there's nothing, nothing. no, we understood paws up, yes, we discussed from the first landing of arms. what were

the wording? now it's really everything. uh, well, the marine stereotype has been dropped, so the game is really open in the open. and the only thing that is very important to us. of course, i am not going and will never take bread from the military, this is not correct, but uh, here i am, i remember different military campaigns in which i participated personally took part in various military campaigns and, uh, it is probably worth paying attention to that not a single military campaign that took place in different territories of different countries, and did not go through the skating rink according to the scenario, drove through and everything ended in victory. yes, except for cancer, yes, well, this and that with big reservations with big reservations, the generals were bought, they drove like sayings and even there, yes, that is, why i because, of course, in this situation, there are victorious reactions, and some defeatism. they are obviously, of course, out of place in this connection. yes, of course, we can argue whatever we want and raise flags here, and there people are on our front-line horseradish. yes, but at the same time, and of course, we should not forget

one thing, one simple thing, that analyzing the situation that is happening now, we must understand that when we talk about the supply of various types of weapons and assume that this pipeline will not be eh? it is necessary to take into account the most important, perhaps, in this whole story, the fact that the types of these weapons will differ in their nature of classification. that is, it will be the most accurate long-range weapon, which will not only reach russian territory, and aircraft and air defense are clear. what it will be, yes, it is on the territory of russia, that is, they do not hide their plans. already they openly began to talk about what we will do, lord, disinfect and demetrize the russian federation, that is, in full. that is, they have illusions, social faces - it declares, that is, this is a war. every day you know more about the russian federation for

us, now, you really paid attention correctly, because there are sofas the expert made various forecasts. it is very important here that that 's when the various terms are pronounced. and there is now very fashionable hundred. some kind of mobilization , mobilization must take place here, first of all , in the brain. yes, people who live in moscow in large cities. yes, there, because at the regional level. i think quite differently. yes refers to a special military operation. and this fact, probably, but here we have our warm gnawed. this situation is understandable. uh, of course, in my opinion, it looks a little bit in the public mind, in my opinion, thank you mikhail yuryevich yes kirillovich, we often say that right now, in fact, russia is at war with the west. actually. this is a very interesting ambivalent thing, because the west is at war with russia, what i mean, if you look at everything that has happened over the past 30 years, including the needle of glory and cancer afghanistan and syria and olivia, we are by far the most serious adversary

for the west of all who were and the most serious sparring partner. and it seems to me that this perspective is very important, because never before has the collective west had such a chance to try out everything that they have been accumulating for so long for me. in general, yes, it became a very significant moment, and the story of literally the recent arrival of eric schmidt, who advises the us government on artificial intelligence, and he simply stated in plain text that we are very pleased with everything, because ukraine has become an excellent training ground, which allows you to generally work out a new type of warfare technique, including the actual cyber spying of our satellite communications system cyber intelligence, the role of mobile systems in new type conflicts, and so on and so forth. this is also very important to understand that it’s not only about, specifically , some ukrainians there, so that russia, namely that the west has not had such an opportunity for a long time,

firstly, to get together and, in general, the idea of that the smell is so monolithic it is nothing more than an idea and such. here, i would say legendarium. absolutely now, of course, this is a very important moment for them to unite, but the most important thing is the possibility of a real technical approbation. everything that used to be just talked about in various design bureaus and research institutes. but today, all this can be tested in the field in real conditions. the exact word us, he, uh, means a training ground. well, imagine where else, where else, and when else you can, in real conditions with blood, ask for corpses to burn from smoke, in general, in real conditions, when everything is something there i came up with e, to take and test the landfill. unfortunately, very appropriate. i understand, but polygon is a very appropriate word nonetheless. one of the characteristics of what is happening, please. well, when this procedure began, we approximately knew what it was going to? we understood,

accordingly, how to correspond, that this intelligence will be presented, what we will need, accordingly, drones, that modern technological solutions are needed, they are needed in an analog way using maps, we need to carry out actions, we perfectly understood how we they understood perfectly well, apparently, that, as it were, now the most important, the most important direction, the component that more than 40% of the reserves that are now available for this operation are thrown into action and that, accordingly, there will be the kherson component, which, accordingly, the kharkiv izyumsky this ledge, because how it goes behind a kind of water object is everything. we also understand so well. yes? the question concerns the next drive now in that, based on the numbers that are present now, we should be, judging around all commit the issue and the rest hold. right now it is necessary to understand that a serious escalation is taking place for the two sides, that is, there are strikes on energy infrastructure facilities. which also didn't exist before. and what, as it were, was proposed to be done in the spring, and so,

respectively, why on transport infrastructure facilities. that is, there is a serious escalation - this is very seriously strengthening, and the stakes that are made in all this are now increasing, if you are pushing 40% of your reserves for in order to show the result and you show it in the north direction. this means that you proceed from the fact that you now need to take and pull up heavier equipment against the backdrop of a difficult heating season. why did all the easing, easing , easing of the position gradually take place, which was initially hard under the kazan at your loading? why wasn't this whole thing done in the spring? immediately in the moment, because as if the red line was indicated, plus or minus, now the situation is as follows looms, and you need to understand, what is our general position on this issue, this is further our own. with the goal corresponds conditionally speaking, the dpr lc, or is it something else, if it is something else, respectively, what are the conditions for something else.

well, it's too early to talk about it yet, let's decide for a start, because you have. uh, respectively, there is uh reserve. yes, he is well prepared. yes, they are now trying how to carry out some actions there in the future . we need to understand. first at of all decisions that take place in a particular circuit, there is, respectively, a last name, a first name, a patronymic and political responsibility for clumsy decisions made. managerial decisions should be worked out normally in kherson, despite the fact that it was originally there, respectively, the board was transferred. from kharkov it is called why it is clear that there should be some administrative conclusions. but why, if we play in debt? this, of course, if we are already playing for a long time, that is, for wear and tear, respectively, then in this case the first must be seriously modified, as it were the technological and economic component of this process, it is natural to make a different bet on armament, to strengthen it accordingly, starting, respectively, from the impact drones to everything else, the dough is built around this economic one, the second thing we need to do

, we need to understand, respectively, what specific task is set here and what to do now , because now the enemy is now vulnerable, that is, now 40% are already gathered here, accordingly, from kiev, that is removed from there. i just didn't know it, to almost half, that is, of all ukrainian forces. there, a significant part of the reserves is now thrown into this contrast. aha that is clear, clear, the next problem is the following. that is there in the sample. that's what will happen next, that is, the retention strategy is if the question is actually a question, in addition to the fact that it is a question for us, in addition to how long- term, how short the process is, how much it is, respectively. what type is it parts are the most important questions after what happened. it is clear the following, if it is short, if in one phrase there, and if not, if you want a full-fledged one. well, of course, advertising on channel one and we'll be back. thanks where else is the girl, return,

money, please, let's make out back. look at something else. they really fell by 20% in a month, i watched. there is a conscience in general, you tell me as a human being, this is all generally normal. and now our task is to return the peasant to the family, yes, so that he walks in a bad bag and all i brought my salary home, didn't miss anything new episodes soon on the first in

packages for only 9 rubles. for 1999 rub. there is a great way to teach your child financial literacy free tinkoff junior card get a tinkoff junior card and we will help your child in the first financial matters. he is so alone. viruses are prepared from the common cold, and the temperature and the fight against viruses. i choose ergoferon, it combines several effects at once, the fight against viruses , the elimination of symptoms. sars inflammation removal. also suitable for children are colds, viruses season remember about ergoferon there are people who always want more than just life, but life with a plus plus more kilometers. plus more confidence

plus more power updated ecota fuel plus from lukoil more pluses more efficiency ozone delivered with love yoko-san diapers for 1080 rubles for ozone 25% discount on a set of two tefal products. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with a sovcombank loan, make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your sovcombank plans people more important. mattress some kind of magic magic mattresses in ascona with a discount of up to 70 percent ascona everyone is supposed to sleep care from pyaterochka discounts for you altera oil 1190 love is chemistry is

elite we have saved for you the taste of the bright sun and the power of fire in every seed jane to instantly with a click you have enjoyed seeds jin know we love and eat vtbeite team to switch from pension to vtb pensioner it will turn out to be 100,000 rubles. and the first 40,000 is guaranteed to receive 1,000 rubles each. go to vtb and everything will work out ozone we deliver with love up to 30% exclusively on ozone on the anniversary of julius mains, 160 years the theater begins with a hanger

rengalin helps to cope with any cough in case of ost respiratory viral infections rengalin for adults and children from 3 years old and dry and wet porridge with rengalin. we are not afraid of our time. we reach the goal in the shortest way. we need more than just gas stations. we need launch pads to give a new charge to those who do not stop gazpromneft is a stop for those who do not stop why i invest the best opportunities always in a crisis is the time to learn new investments. install the tinkoff investment app. complete a training course and receive a package of shares worth up to 20,000 rubles as a gift. tinkoff he is such a sporty style and energetic mood all this is a new collection of casual clothes and shoes from adidas at wildberries we continue to work live so

mikhail yuryevich wanted to answer dmitry for a long time, just in case, now i’ll remind you what we talked about that so to say, well, it is quite obvious that this conflict has entered a new phase. he has crossed over two dozen countries in a natural way on his own, without hesitation, without hiding it from us. they are fighting, supplying everything that is possible, and we assumed. yes, this is still a guess, so to speak. it seems to me that it is absolutely fair and everything that is possible and impossible will be substituted. well, therefore, therefore, it is clear that this is some kind of new situation, to which there should be some new, probably, answers. yes, please, i have a principle, it is quite simple here. let's. now we will all sit down together in unison, then we will especially control the situation and tell everything about what we are going to make our enemy our enemies. let's lay out the cards, where are we going, what are we, what is our goal, what is the intermediate goal? what is the purpose back? the day after tomorrow and so on. yes? let's e, i'm still proceeding from the principle. we have, uh, we have a

supreme commander. we have a defense minister. they make a statement i am like and the vast majority of our citizens of our country. yes. uh, i believe what these people say, and i'm convinced that none of them will allow themselves to lie and not allow themselves to make any reckless statements regarding a special military operation. that's what er, the official point of view is for, official statements that are verified. do you understand, many, why do we have this alarmism? yes, because all sorts of garbage is being read. she looks like an abomination that uploads yes ukrainian channels and someone starts. basically. it just needs to be acknowledged. well, of course, it is conditional to pass in the telegram, then it turns out the cat abandoned the kittens. this is putin 's fault on the one hand, and on the other hand, the flag is raised on the couch already, when it has not yet been delivered to the liberated territory. you see, therefore, of course. this is the most important question of the attitude of calm attitude. the main thing, yes, we are worried

about ours, not just worried, her heart hurts because of our guys who are around. this is the main issue in the life of our e-fighters who today defend russia and so on. understandable, understandable. well, that's all, from the evil one all plans. we even have there is no choice, because the language, yes, the clinch, yes, the nato countries of the west and russia , you understand the next five minutes, yes, but it doesn’t happen quickly. it is necessary to think over everything in detail and approach, but kohl we are talking about goals. i'm sorry, i just can't get away from oncology clinical right now. phew so, uh, i know what you're talking about, let's have a little. let's warm up the crowd. well, it's just that this is probably the most fantastic document that you and i will have to discuss in our lifetime. here, though, in a minute, olesya will present it to you. vlad just wanted to say something, and i want to give him the floor. yes, i meant to say next first. eh, we need to understand what

we have just seen. that's not what's happening. now all these countries began to do at least 4 months ago. we have seen the effect of what they are doing. and accordingly, in this case, we must understand that this is a delayed effect, it will continue to grow. therefore, the real question is that we should not pretend that we suddenly saw, we must draw conclusions from everything that is happening, because the most important thing, i repeat in this case. it is, of course, on time. so let's just rebuild everything. it is understandable, because otherwise, indeed, our question seems to be very simple, unfortunately, all these societies are in a state of bears in hibernation. and then it fell asleep and they were explained that everything is fine with us. we are winning, we will wake up already. victory now we are talking about the fact that we have seen the effect of how they are fighting against us, all of europe plus the usa is the most the main thing, however, and within the framework of this war, you would, that

is, a choice, and the challenge is not just there, let's say putin or shoigu there, the challenge is the whole nation of the nation and its future, because no one will allow us to get out of this war, so to speak, victims , but they are defeated, either we will win, or they will defeat us, and danilov announced the results of the victory recently , you understand that you are a fool. as it is in the language, he does not know how to do them. yes quite obviously. something that we have voiced. these are not ukraine's plans, these are plans. the usa is absolutely here again, you need to understand i will quote something. now. i mentioned something. daniel already was, of course. what are we talking about. and that means reparation, that means complete surrender, demilitarization. so to speak, because you and the payments will repeat reparations from russia, do you think that this is the nonsense of a madman? yes, this is crazy nonsense. however, he did not come to him, so to speak, in a dream, but in the form of some of his manuals from the west, this is their intention. this is their desire. this is their plan. well, it is, but uh, this whole uh, concept that is working against us now. she, of course,

rests so far on what they do not see, red lines, more precisely, even the roof over themselves, but uh, while uh, the red line is obvious, because it is contained in a very simple formula. she doesn’t often sound the last, but she’s right, the nuclear-missile side cannot lose the war, because if there comes a moment of shame or, uh, destruction, then, in principle, in this case the choice is also obvious and understand, no one wants shame. let's just say yesterday's suddenly unexpectedly, air conditioners at ukrainian glass central plants began to explode. it was a sign not so much to ukraine, not so much to zelensky. how many of those who govern ukraine because this is the rise. help me to decipher this sign in this case, the americans, who, let's say, model and motivate all these processes. they saw that we were starting to raise the bar. that is, we are already starting to hammer on the infrastructure. so, in the next one, somewhere on some floor, there

will be the same nuclear missile weapons, i’ll remind you, god didn’t exist for you three months ago, when all of a sudden for the first time, it means that they began to massively give weapons, and we for the first time they started talking about the fact that we should somehow respond. they suddenly began to lament and conjure us not to speak of a nuclear missile war. what are you, there can be no nuclear missile war, we are not fighting against russia it is understandably dangerous to say why, because they understood very well and were afraid to listen, yes, hell, i understood everything like that, and now the author is the autological clinch alexander as for the goals, then zelensky has quite specific goals; he demands security guarantees for a long time. and now i framed it in some such project that introduced the strange west to the united states. we are some european leaders and that's what's most interesting. and what is the security according to zelensky and what does a safe ukraine mean in the future, are we listening? the treaty will

unite the main group of allied countries and ukraine usa great britain canada poland italy germany france australia turkey as well as the countries of northern europe and the baltic states, central and eastern europe require long-term stable investments in the large-scale defense-industrial base of ukraine transfer of weapons and intelligence support from allies, intensive training missions and joint exercises under the auspices of the european union and nato, the structure of the kiev security treaty provides for a full-fledged sanctions package against the aggressor country, and may also contain additional components, such as the agreement on providing ukraine with modern air defense systems regional security agreements. in the black sea and so on, the extension of these guarantees to the entire territory of ukraine within the framework of international recognized borders, a ban on the lifting of sanctions against the russian federation , including, until it compensates for the damage, security guarantees do not replace the desire of ukraine to join in kind. this is the militarization of ukraine, that's

all. this is called. what is this project? uh, interesting, yes, if you pray that yermak prepared it, then anders fugrass too. maybe he would be the former head of nato. but the most interesting thing is to imagine for a second the documents, that is, people are conspiring to write documents. today someone wrote in a telegram, i don’t remember who, but it’s very good. confessions of a kept woman. like you will feed me to drink, then supply and so on, and for the rest of my life i undertake to spoil a good contract under the door of russia. yes, a good one is signed, well, in fact, this is what we are talking about. yes, this is still a project, but nonetheless. yes, but the very fact of such an appearance on such an idea of ​​such a document, in my opinion. tell me kirg. you are an international lawyer. you should know, but in general, wash an unprecedented story, just bullshit and wrote on 15 pages who owes what to them with great e feeling with great satisfaction notes that as long as there are some representatives of the states. their vague or quite

meaningful desires to document until then international law will live, because pay attention. in general, most of what was voiced here, and ukraine receives it anyway, but it’s always nice to have paper, that is, after all, paper, as a kind of symbol of guarantees, as a kind of symbol of stability and what is really this, and the position of the kept woman will last. as long as possible uh and it will last it is very important, first of all, apparently, from the psychological side. but, excuse me please, tell me, is it really the papers, but they were carrying some kind of ukraine that sneezed and wanted to spit on the same minsk agreements, which were signed. this is also official paper. is it a document or is it another document of a relative document, because if, according to the minsk agreements, the ukrainian side. now he is quite openly saying that it didn’t mean anything to them, but here, just the same, it’s theirs. well, of course, it will be for them, it means a lot.

in fact, everything is built on this, that is , those agreements are executed in which all participants are interested, if the agreement is needed by one person, then, of course, such agreements are always taxed. yes, any document, it should, but it's not for me to explain this to you. and in general, yes, uh, it must be very firmly written there. including liability for non-execution of this very document. this is the most important sanctions for non-fulfillment of this very document in the case of the minsk agreements, which the economy remembered. yes, it seems to me absolutely. well, as it were, a completely different story, because france, germany, and russia, yes, acted as guarantors of the guarantee performance, respectively, it could be assumed. yes, and we were obliged to assume that if ukraine did not comply with this document, it means that sanctions from germany and france should follow, that's right. unfortunately, that's not how it works, which is to say, if it were a rational thing, that's right, it 's bound to be there. which a speaks about

responsibility about some kind of restriction. yes quite right, but the minsk format, but assumed a gentlemen's agreement, goodwill and in fact. these are negotiations that were simply transferred to paper, that is, the result of negotiations, the result of an agreement of wills, and at that time they were, uh, transferred to paper format, in fact, this is exactly what is being proposed, therefore, goodwill from the europeans is already required here and the americans, who should simply sign with their blood that right now they are from now and up until the end of time, as i understand it, but they should take on this burden and carry it under the name of ukraine yes, they also receive unconditionally. but the exploitation of this territory has a large number of advantages, and let's be frank, but in exchange, uh, of course, technology, but people. i think over time technique. and, of course, a huge amount of money. yes, of course, i still

disagree on something, but it ’s still impossible to name the difference from this one, even this document. this memorandum is the draft of this memorandum most of all, because the minsk agreements are friends. this is not a document of you of course, this is a kind of project. yes, this is not saving some kind of wish to you, yes. here, whatever you like, nevertheless it is very symbolic, unlike the minsk agreements, which, after all, there were 10 points absolutely specific, yes, but there are specifics, but you understand, at least a million more countries , it’s all relative to how it was signed, that is, with almost 100% certainty. how was it written? that is, they are against the background of the fact that they are there, but they had it there, and the activation near kharkov is actually the territory that they have now captured. it in total, there are about two percent of the entire territory that are under our control of today's liberated ukraine. that is, it is in the region of 50 m². here. and we can only say one thing, that they are of course. this is a happy happy somewhere in a bunker

underground they began to celebrate the whole thing, then with cocaine, like zelensky who with vodka, like people like poroshenko well, that is, here is the same danilov . by the way, he loves whiskey too, like poroshenko . here they were just sitting in a bunker under the ground so that he wouldn’t get into them, the response russian some kind of rocket and decided, being under the closet, to make a list, as it were, that should be used there for the e-media space. as a matter of fact, the generation what will happen if it is signed is the most interesting thing, most likely. it doesn't matter anymore, it's important that they were terribly scary and at the same time. well, they were really tired for half a year, they sat and were even a little more afraid here, they breathed a little. now they will again begin to be afraid of these guarantees for children. look, this is not the interior. sorry this is not the most interesting and the most interesting discuss. so to speak, the absurdity of this document and so on. no the most interesting. if we assume these same ukraine, yes, offers, uh, offers to pay or pay for everything. they put it in for something obviously this document

suggests that the benefit of these people over there is shaved, what do we have there? yes, it should be both third fifth tenth but poland italy germany france australia turkey canada through great britain usa and so on the countries of northern europe and the baltics, and so on. i mean, they must be awful. ukraine is interested no, it is not ukraine that gives them, they propose to share russia together, i don’t understand that they call all the places together, that they are now proposing the winner this document. this. in the sense of how, in the sense of offering me to pay money. what am i to you, and you already used me, in fact. we told you that you already used it to harm russia but wait a second guys. well, please, do not shoot down, that is, what is the point? eh, they're really in a state now, that just a little more tomorrow russia will collapse, they will begin to divide it. and they have already begun to unsubscribe for themselves the kuban, there is still a part of belarus and they say, which means, and who is there in the usa who helped us ? do you have alaska? and this is a proposal for a deriban,

which russia certainly does not yet have and will not have, but they are already in this state. they breathed fresh air. see, including australia a. remember the revision with which they created, that is, they all these countries confirm that we have already done this, and that's it. e guys. here's another military about this pack, which they collect. look here. here we say that we say that russia, here we are alone, yes, basically. well, there is, of course, belarus is helping, thank god china, which supplies the shoulder, is strange, but in general we are alone with this pack. they don't come out one on one. look, not the united states, not britain, nor even ukraine one on one weakly. well, of course, be sure to gather in the bastard. you declare completely in order to receive later, of course, everyone crawled away together this is a tradition. you know the tradition of europe there and the west once every 100 years to get together to come to russia to get thule to crawl back. yes, this is a good option. we are familiar. yes, it’s another matter to

say so, the plot is such a plot, but if you get a little closer, it’s important to understand that these are, as you put it, lyuli. yes, they never say that, but it's still not a simple hard, long story, he says, then there from a distance of 100 years. there, once they came, they got it and they left, but in fact i’m talking with, so to speak, with approach. here between they came and left there is a big big long hard bloody work hard for the whole country, please. but i remind you that earlier it was proposed as a variant of blinkin, who came recently demanded that proposals be prepared accordingly. it's just that they prepared them in such a form, which, as it were, is impossible to accept. here, especially there is an excellent part about the fact that they will be lifted from the sanctions, as it were, until the damage is compensated, and there is damage in the trillions. so, by the way, here and, accordingly, the amount of 300 billion. so far, at least, there is something of 300 billion dollars a year

. history was not rolled out. as long as there are. no matter how, the support defined in them, they are trying to figure out how to arrange this story now, of course, it matters. in what form is it to be formalized if it is a bill in congress? and the law in congress, which figs then, naturally, you will deploy from there, as it were, especially after the midterm elections, plus or minus, or, accordingly, the decision on the sanctions component there for six months, the problem is included in the following. now the countries have taken over. these are the obligations that are gradually being torn apart by the corresponding economy to the full steppe, not to varying degrees. really breaks good breaks. it's good. thank you. economics. everything is friendly. let's say. this must be remembered, by the way, when saying who really is, where what it rolls in, in short, the meaning next, and against this background, they need to be institutionalized, that is, filed into a document. why is it necessary? that is, the same germany that i am now getting myself unemployment there, it is necessary to explain to its citizens. and what are we paying with this unemployment, as if for what is happening, look. here is an opportunity to win. here in this document what meaning do you just increase the number of

weapons supplied. and it's possible to win there. and you can suffer a little all winter, for example, naturally, and then next year. but everything will give russia. yes, we are, like, another question is that it is impossible to go one on one physically to a nuclear country. it's impossible. we have all the proxy conflicts behind even the soviet union, all the candies, so here is the question. the next question is to have it now , how glad it is that everything else needs to be formalized into some kind of agreement, on which to insist later and which is natural, for which then hold on. that's the main task that's going on right now and the main task on the other hand, to get involved as much as possible, respectively, so that there is no feeling that something can move further. the fight is not over territory. ultimately, the struggle is for consciousness, the struggle is for understanding what will happen in 6 months. in 6 months there will be a correspondingly broken economy in the european union. the same line , figuratively speaking, it will somehow advance the rest of the engine there , or advance somewhere else, or, accordingly, everything will be fine. but just wait a little fight. this is what is going on now and these statements are aimed specifically at it's a movement. they are going to plow their whole europe there. why does it mean that part of the

soviet-style weapons has already been delivered; all other types of weapons that are supplied require serious investments. they follow require very serious substitutions. that is, in fact, a certain bifurcation point has already begun in deliveries. that is, what it says there, they are going to supply weapons, respectively, air defense and medium-term long-term. them. we must place them, we must order them, we must produce it in a certain time. i mean, it starts now. but, well, let's see. let's see, respectively, if the years are actually years to three years. there are some weapons and types of weapons, and they look, that is, the problems are the following here. i now there are now who of opportunities, this is, as it were, a window of opportunity, in which, if it is certainty and you need to take it as your content. crack your pictures of the world and explain what will happen in these correspondences of 3 years and for this this part of the present, which is still a struggle, is necessary. for this there is a struggle going on for this, and for this you can give up 40% of the reserves and 1080% of the reserves. you can drop all reserves. you have to show that this picture, maybe, and then,

respectively, fuck schultz or even the rest so that they supply, supply, supply and watch economic problems. that is the task and that is why it is necessary in the form, i understand, but it is possible, but here we do not lose that he interrupted you, of course, continues two countries that have nothing to do with this in this situation do not lose signing any documents, then america and canada by and large. yes, in america, canada may be smaller, they don't lose anything at all. they can leave europe to sign any document, the bigger europe will be, and it will remain completely unbearable to take it off the tongue, what will happen, because we are now seeing processes that, objectively, many laughed a few months ago. come on, why are you telling tales that in europe there may be some something else is happening there, but we already see, we see the official statements that were made there by the scots, the catalans who took to the streets got more than a million people out. yes, that is, the process is starting in europe. these are not local conflicts. and these are

global protests. the global protests that will be directed against the governments of these countries will, of course, have the americans in the role of observers in this process. uh, we take on such an eastern function, we sit on the shore. let's see how the corpses are float or coffins, whatever. yes, that is, they only win, so of course, they will push the signing of any memorandum or agreement or treaties, whatever. you know the documents that you will mean the continuation of the war, so called europe america is not profitable. yes, the collapse of europe is profitable for the deduced. otherwise, they became braggies. that's all. here, yes. thanks, thanks. i just want to say that here is still here, what is important, it is clear that we understand that america is there across the oceans. it is clear that above them drops it is clear that sitting with popcorn, although there is less and less popcorn, because corn has eyes, i'm sorry that it doesn't work out. yes, i understand, but, uh, what else is it about ? whatever, he is talking about what he is translating, as if this conflict from

a situation, so to speak, is really some kind of operation in , so to speak, intellectualizes. forgive me , please, a long one, i don’t know a lot of fundamental, summer or centenary confrontation. he has already, so to speak, officially signed everything russia is moving from a rhetorical enemy, so to speak, from a hypothetical to an official one. after all. it is scheduled for years, they will accept it, they will not accept it, it does not matter. the main intention for years. we are officially declared, so to speak, an enemy with whom we must not only keep in mind, but fight, that's what we are talking about. in europe, something went wrong some 11 days ago, the minister of finance of the g7 was reported, and how they reported brightly, so arrogantly about their intention to lead the ceiling on gas prices from russia, but enough. as the saying goes

it was, well, the temperature dropped a little and something has changed dramatically now. so they changed their minds, and limit the price of russian gas. uh, they said no, it seems that we should not, as it were, act to our detriment, but, nevertheless, they came up with some kind of loophole, but they came up with some kind of tax, and this is what according to the document that got into the network , the eu executive body refuses from limiting the price of russian gas, but pushing for an additional tax on the excess profits of oil and gas energy companies the company will face a windfall tax , which is called the solidarity contribution solidarity contribution sounds pretty good though. yes, and the tax on windfall profits, so to speak, fascinating dima, please explain to us, but this document and this prospect, but all this was known. at the beginning of last week, as the european commission vanguished,

on wednesday they rolled out a document, according to which they proposed three main positions and everyone knew that, accordingly, the ceiling on gaz, of course , would not pass. here are the three positions following first - this is just a vision of a tax on oil for energy companies that do not deal in gas in the first place. as a matter of fact, more precisely, this is a county, some police income, and we are talking primarily from the european union, that is, the companies that mine there. well, there are very few of them actually. ah, there's some shell here. well, although, he is also moving to the uk now, that is, in fact, the european index, well, importers, that is, they are actually suffering very serious losses. that is what they decided to take in order to support their population , cut off these funds from the energy company that operates in the european union, and present them there accordingly. that's why they triggered the gas tax. this applies to gazprom because we are starting the european union why didn't it work? why hasn't a corresponding restriction been introduced on gas contracts for gazprom in the first place, because most countries oppose the word "majority" in general. in this case,

this is actually the majority, that is, say who is in favor. here, uh, in fact, there is the main ideologue, this is france if you understand it like that. here, respectively, because they receive gas from gazprom, respectively, and to the extent that the mail, just because of this, was relatively worried there, in fact, the baltic states offered, because the volume is small. here, uh, but you need to understand everything perfectly now on the cheapest gas and, most likely, will be in the near future. to seem like him means that gazprom will simply block the entire flow, and now it supplies approximately 83 million cubic meters per day in two directions in the ukrainian direction and with. that is, along the central direction and, accordingly, turkish through this one through the balkan stream. if this volume collapses, then the pressure will seem strange, which, as it were, feels good, in fact, like hungary, which receives gas from there, or suppose. austria is the same or suppose. indeed, slovakia is therefore from this point of view. how would it's a very, very serious problem the same, the czech republic that organized this whole event is wonderful. she is in the eu presidency, she herself is now

negotiating with gazprom, in general, by the way, like the volgars, so i doubt very much the idea was originally, as it were. here, excuse me please, here we are naive people, simple russian naive people, of course, absolutely. uh, it’s incomprehensible to us that some kind of amazing amazing paradox seems to us in this, that is, if the guys start, then they declare war on us. they say what it means to press for now. it doesn't mean it won't break. and yet we say so. for some reason not blocked at the same second i repeat. this is me being naive. firstly, in order to continue to supply this ratny in order to pull on their market, it was enough to block what we had already blocked, we blocked the nord stream one. here we do not deliver on it, and thanks to this, in many respects, respectively, the prices that we see now. and the fact that you will block more prices will not be there. but the fact that you will earn less money that you spend this federation yes, in the majority, of course, on the caliber for everything else. here's how would be a deep question arises. that's it in this. that is, as if more than that, you should have them, gas pipelines, all those players who are against those sanctions, as if trapeding with responsible ones, for example, go to hungary to punish hungary for acting against all the victorious ones you meet

european cases, because 2 billion purchases - it turns out, respectively, directly from latin labor; moreover, they remain from friendship and still receive oil, accordingly, through the pipeline, as if before something goes somewhere to enter it is necessary to understand, respectively, the consequences for it to be germany, it will only be better and like everyone else, no matter how the players are. but the fact is that because germany is in fact, nord stream receives, in fact, the first one, that's why from this point. you see, how it is necessary to understand, as if, by the way, speaking, yamal does not work either. here, and therefore, well, it’s not pumped, respectively, because of poland, here, therefore, from this point of view, how such a decision would be made and , in fact, it was clear from the very beginning, that not a single country that is actually on gazprom's contracts will refuse the cheapest gas. despite the fact that gazprom will begin to receive ultra-high profits somewhere in the winter in the spring, when, accordingly, prices are simply formed with a lag of several months, the highest prices for gazprom when it receives, how to weigh these all high oil prices, for example , on some summer contracts he will receive exactly

e, in the winter dash in the spring. understandable understandable understandable understandable yes slowly. you raised your hand please, i think it's the best. uh, in general, i reflected on this idea with the introduction. as for gas prices, the prime minister of norway said that in general, strictly speaking, uh, this measure does not solve anything, but does not solve anything. it is the main problem of the fact that there will still be little gas in europe. and here, indeed. it seems to me that this idea, it just shows the difference between some kind of information stuffing, and they are made, including, by the whole collective west and in particular the european union, because, well it sounds so impressive to have a cap on russian gas prices. that is, we are working with sanctions continue to operate. it’s like, really, we are pumping there, it’s not quite another thing to go in some real way and really not infringe on yourself and, in fact , don’t hurt your own companies. namely, this is what they are trying to do now, in general. and the europeans, perhaps

more reluctantly, but nevertheless we see the result, therefore, a lot. i think now in the coming months, especially in anticipation of winters of the heating season will be here are such imprints. statements that i would say that this is pseudo-economics, that is, it sounds real. uh, a very inspiring anti-russian position for everyone, but also attempts to contain it, so to speak. well, yes, of course, because when there is an informational one, the political field is pumped up, what is really here like this. uh, bitter russian bear, naturally the voters ask the question. what did you do to stop him? here we have introduced such a proposal. here, accordingly, we signed such memorandum, but in fact nothing is being done, but simply there is such a planned preparation for the cold season, and that's it. in general, they are well aware that the format will now be every man for himself. this is also very important to understand what they are doing there. this is for whom they do it as a tax on the solidarity contribution, solidarity ah. for some, this statement is made. yes, the same thing

is said, in fact, which actually earns on gas exports, but i don’t understand the second supplier, of course, two just opposed it. ceiling of gas for all companies, they discussed it not against, broken down. and acted, by the way, speaking a gas mask. in general, yes, these are two different initiatives, for whom do you see these statements. well, yes, when it was when it was e as an expression district, this is a bright and very effective statement, look, yes, but it’s clear that everyone has specialists, so to speak, well, a skeptical left eyebrow, climbed up, which someone on the ceiling? well, everyone. it was approximately clear that this was some kind of nonsense that was not realizable then, for whom it was a statement, you know, they give me who to develop whom, including us. that is, we begin. ok then. it sounds like nonsense, but suppose it's not nonsense, because today the impossible is already possible, and we begin to work out a strategy anyway. thanks and this too. what for? why was this done, because it became wait here. so, this is your ant matvey showed up right in the subject. poland

ordered such a volume of coal which should be enough for a very harsh winter, which means the prime minister 's mother. he said that for the entire heating season from from september to april, significantly more coal was contracted than last year. that is, the poles are ready for the super harsh winter. they have their own storage facilities there, it seems to be yes, respectively, the cost of coal has increased directly six times 11:10, moreover, it is 6 billion. six million tons, they are going to. as i understand it, it transits through belarus. so, accordingly, the foreign market came from. now very poor money costs so, by the way. well, yes, they are significant, as far as what is happening, as it were, is there. you just understand what process, and the cost of gas can increase by 80%. it will definitely be expressed at 80% in october. and accordingly, the population will face this. in any case, the same blow, that is, the total volume of the blow, is respectively measured in trillions. you

understand, this is the amount of a trillion, that's all, for example, all countries have thrown off this pandemic, that is , in order not to face extremely severe consequences, because they will be the most severe so you will need to make the most important decision. their decision, of course, was not on gas, not for everything else. the first is the limitation of consumption. uh-huh, didn't sound either. yes, 10-15% there with peaks and the most important, respectively. this is the electricity price ceiling. here, for electricity, naturally 200, and mega-except for gas generation. this is the argument, i see. well, i would just like to add in this case rather. uh, there was a very interesting discussion of the germans. and there the germans were diligently reassured that the brilliant government had found a solution and the storage was full. now you are 85 or 86%. uh-huh instead of the usual 81% there, at the moment, but in the same place as the leader very well and they caught him. they told him, is this storage enough, or should you continue to receive gas, well, i had to say that and you have to get gas

from somewhere. and most importantly, in this case, how long these storage facilities will last, if the industry works, it turned out that for less than 1.5 months, that is, in fact, we kind of provide these uh storage facilities, as it were damping of passage, that is, they are constantly replenished from them, they spend all the time. everything depends on what they are provided with. yes, i have the second one of course pleased. in this case, there are, as it were , payments, which are not in our place. it was the germans who showed themselves to be voiced that if last year, it means, uh, a german family paid around 100 euros for 700 gas, and 700,700 moreover, when they are very strong there, look for some company. where, lord, it’s cheaper there with some additional conditions, you can find it for 500 something and at the same time. it was also announced there that in this case everyone called for those who still have little money to receive material assistance, that is the state is ready to help, financially. no, let me remind you that the state. in order to help those who are

ready to give 300 euros for the whole year, of course, 700 monthly 300 euros a year, but that’s not all , in order to receive this material assistance, in this case it is necessary to change german legislation, because material assistance . are you eligible to receive? only if your monthly earnings are below a certain level, i understand. yes, i understand. with such a let them open themselves, which, as you know, it means they cry, but continue to eat cactus, they understand why they eat it very interesting, but still it's a pleasure. no it gets, it looks like there's dubious, of course, but still, of course, uh, any politics. yes, the economy is a testament to politics, so you should probably look at the root cause of what is happening in a slightly different field, in my opinion. for example, a very significant event is now in sweden, yes, that is, the elections were held and the right-wing right voted for them, they are finally watching them they talked for a month. everything is correct. right now. right next we look at other countries in

france the right is gaining. that is, in principle, nationally oriented political movements. in all countries, all this is beginning to gain momentum, all this is happening against the backdrop of continuing flow of migrants of emigrants towards europe, that is, we understand that there is a certain process of first nationalization, which may then move towards the nazisification of the fascists of all these european guys, who before so far many people consider themselves superhuman people, we understand, yes. we understand that this is a very advantageous moment, a very advantageous mechanism against the background of the upcoming protests, which will definitely occur in europe, because of the economic collapse. now he has not escaped him, that is, not all mice want, but on the other hand. i think that this is the emergence of nationalist movements, which are there and moreover, in ukraine, this is already a proven topic. remember when they went out to protest, how the nationalists ran out into the street became the head of the protests in the form behind them and led in the right direction in europe, the same will now try to carry out, so that the result is completely. well, what's the right way to say it?

remove the very vaunted democracy, which is not so everything, wants to take a trump card. well, how do you want your own government. why does the government need to be recruited, but on the contrary, people just need to be appointed. they were worth it can only nazis can make you smile some cry but there are special things that make you cry for joy that we and every day we watch video letters from the front that yulia baranovskaya delivers

. let's get acquainted. i was yulia alexander , who had my own military activity in the fourteenth year and went to fight until the age of 18, served as an officer , was already the head of the service, but then, for family reasons, resigned. and so from february 24, when for me, as i call it, the second war began, he came again. and where we are now, we are now at the dugouts, on the second line of defense we are waiting for a possible breakthrough by the enemy. well, let's hope it doesn't happen. better already. we are to them, than they are, what are the positions of the guys, there is an enemy, we are here, this is the second line of defense of kilometers, approximately what functions? and the second line, in case the first

position retreats, covers the retreat. well, it also hits the enemy in the same way, that is, the second second line is no less dangerous than the first one; it covers , strengthens, reinforces, if reinforcements are needed. where is your spouse right now? there is also a family. yes , i have a beloved wife, a beauty and four daughters, after constant shelling of the center, all the same persuaded his wife to go to rostov . no, she worked here in the maternity hospital, which she recently flew back to, so she regularly flew there in the fourteenth or fifteenth year , but now, nevertheless, now there are already more children. that’s why i forced the children to send short little ones. i still pack it up and go in the

eighteenth year, he quit, then, when it all started together. this is our homeland. and how to be on the sidelines to hide, but no, they are not for us. we so we can’t, for sure, the girls ask you, dad, when will all this end answer the child to such a question. they tell me, dad is leaving. everything. come, i say, and who will wait to endure everything? do you have any agreement? she's calling you. nita no, well, in our situation you can't agree. here, for the first time, nothing can be planned for the next 5 minutes. what are the names of the girls arina nadya zhenya and dina and the wife of alexander, how am i

? you and we look forward to seeing you soon in donetsk return home. so you protect all of us there so that we can return faster and together we all celebrate the victory day at home. these are the touching moments that make me cry, i love you, i miss you confidently. you will soon arrive without you. it's hard to come here, come soon. for their sake angels for their sake, of course, all this for their sake and come soon, of course, we also join this with victory, of course. good afternoon, the

information channel on the first continues its work on the air, time to remember, my name is alexander gordon in the uk, the new king 's mother died, left the throne charles when the coronation will take place, it is not known where it will take place, but the uk is a country of tradition and tradition. charles iii, this is the name he chose for himself, has already been appointed king. and even before the english bees, that they really have a long tradition of how the royal beekeeper informs the bees that the queen has died? and now we have a new ruler, so that they know who they bring honey to, well, sometimes bees are smarter than british ones. politicians. it would seem, but this is an internal matter. yes

, the change in uh is not even the power of some kind of power there. this is a change of king. but, but we understand that the englishwoman, as a vermin, will continue to crap, we understand that great britain has never, except for a very short period of time, which was associated with the fact that we fought together with nazism, not been a supporter or ally, neither russia nor the soviet union nor the russian empire. and today we have to answer the question of how with such a prime minister as istress cope with such a king as charles iii and most importantly the english many of them at least know and honor their history and are prone to pesticism. why? i say this because the name carl has a very difficult history in the history of great britain to remember. his name was the main intrigue of the first hours after he became king, he could choose any of the many names given to him

at birth and, accordingly, could become philip the first arthur the first or the seventh george. after all, for 70 years, while charles was the heir to the time on the choice of throne name was a lot back in 2005 de times. she wrote that charles was considering choosing the name george in honor of his grandfather. the prince of wales discussed renouncing the name of charles iii when he became king in order to avoid unpleasant associations with one of the bloodiest periods in the history of the monarchy, but it was not the memory of george the sixth that did not stop the prince from choosing the title of charles iii. although until the last moment there were doubts about the choice throne name. still, the reason for this was the notoriety of the name and the fate of the two previous its bearers. king charles became monarch in 1625 and up in the country a long turmoil immediately after accession to the throne came into conflict with parliament. as

a result, the authorities decided the king, and the monarch, in response, unleashed a civil war and it turned into a catastrophe for the throne, plus marriage to a catholic and accusations of catholic inclinations as a result of king charles the first was tried for treason and beheaded, and parliament announced the abolition of the english monarchy as unnecessary burdensome and dangerous for the good of the people. it almost became end of the british crown. the monarchy was returned to england by the son of charles the first, charles ii, but happiness, this name did not bring him. he, along with the scots allies, was defeated by oliver chromeville's forces at the battle of booster. after that, he fled the country and managed to return only 9 years after the death of cromwell and removal from power. his heirs during his reign suffered the great plague of london. 1.665 epidemic. in which about a fifth of the population of the british capital died out, because of which the great fire of london followed in 1.66,

when the fire destroyed most of the city and those who survived the epidemic were left homeless in the palace, they decided this name brings misfortune and not a single british monarch used the name charles anymore, taking into account such a reputation charles, why did prince charles choose this throne name, because the curse of the name - this is not a joke and could harm not only the king, but britain itself, the new king of great britain has officially chosen the royal name of charles iii. this means that he is taking on a name that carries heavy historical baggage. they are put wet gunpowder carl they want to interfere with your karma. in addition, charles is aware that many still cannot forgive him for the scandalous divorce from princess diana and marriage to his longtime girlfriend camilla parkerballs, who in the end still waited and became the queen of the ends. do you think mrs. parkerballs contributed to the breakdown of

your marriage, in this marriage? there were three of us, and i don't like crowds. by the way, his ancestor charles ii also got burned for infidelity. he was known as the jolly king and had a large number of mistresses and illegitimate children, of whom he recognized 14 as his own and generously gave themes to others ducal. earldoms are prominent, multiplying the estates of british peers. it can be seen in the genes, something remained at the beginning of this year. the london police began investigating the activity. prince fund. charles, allegedly the son of the queen, handed out titles right and left for the right to receive british citizenship, scotland yard launched an investigation into allegations of paying money in exchange for honors related to the charitable activities of the prince of wales, an investigation the prince's fund began following a report that a saudi national had been asked to provide financial assistance. yes, and monarchs in general may have problems. the commonwealth of the crown includes 56 states, mostly former british colonies.

canada has already proclaimed charles as its king, but here are many island states. reads to escape from the power of the crown last year, barbados instead of the british monarchy, chose to become a parliamentary republic, antigua and barbuda also announced their desire to leave the british commonwealth nations in addition, in many countries of this commonwealth the opinion is popular that london should be demanded reparations for its colonial past. i would like to look at it all the same, does volgam viktorovich have a curse of a name or not? and what do you know about us? it all depends on whether people are mystical or not, yes, although we live in the enlightened 21st century, mysticism, alas, has not come down. and, maybe, fortunately, he didn’t leave the agenda, what to say, well, karl is not a cal 3 direct descendant of the two karls mentioned, they were stewards. and he is windsor that is actually mount

concrete. yes, that is, there is this distant relationship, but a very distant second, he really lived a difficult youth in exile, but despite the fact that he, so to speak, e became a witness after his restoration to the british royal throne of plague and fire. eh, nonetheless. uh restored the stuart dynasty to the throne. that is, in general, plus the whole point of view. in addition, it is necessary to seek justice for the sake of plague and fires were under the british kings with other names. you see, nevertheless, so to speak, this is, of course, remembered, because the closer such disasters are to us, the better they are not remembered. personally, i'm not inclined. to believe that matters of mysticism should be taken seriously. yes on the one hand, we can say that they say the swedish cal 12 also ended badly, yes, but it was the twelfth. excuse me, he came to power at the age of

sixteen, and understanding comes from experience, but another thing. so to speak, such an old man, already whitewashed with gray hair, who had seen enough of everything, was both a military and military pilot and military sailor and commanded a warship. and he has long been the chairman of the council of the british commonwealth - this, of course, so to speak, is a whole series of big pluses, so it seems to me that there is some kind of mystical fear, so to speak. e is a name in itself. it doesn't carry you. take for example charlemagne yes who is still the greatest figure in the history of germany and france or the fourth czech carril. yes, but we're talking about british history. all for the sake of the british, not people, but all members of one enu, common human family. somebody joked like that. once he says that they love their horses for so long and so fiercely that they

simply became like them. yes, of course, joke of course, yes, but nonetheless. it seems to me that one should not be afraid of the name as such, see alexander yes, well, firstly, i want to express my condolences to the british people in connection with the death of elizabeth ii , who for them was more than a symbol. and even in the london underground responded to this with words. we wanted to think. and what will you forever with us? this is really a big loss for them. i can understand them. as for karl, my god, everything is interesting, well, firstly for the country for their country. it's like he was charles' pardon so he remains unchanged. for us, this yes is a different meaning. and what do we know about charles charles ii , after all, the one who gave britain hmm that very famous act protecting the rights of, uh, those who are taken into custody yes, hb from the famous corps, or

maybe in honor of him he really wanted to come in , i thought. that's what he couldn't take with them philip because that would be too pretentious. if he took the name of arthur, i'm afraid that the world would comment on this for a long time and happily . i'm neatly 70 years old. you know, to name yourself with king arthur. yes, i suspect not. here, accordingly, the choice was between george and karl, he could take the name george in honor of his grandfather, but here, by the way, about mysticism. although, i kind of defend the ratio, but then it suddenly dawned on me. and excuse me, but the second world war began in the reign of his grandfather. it is quite possible that this is why he did not choose this name. the same applies to karl, but i suspect that our uh is not

ours, but the hero's freudian slip here. and, well, in principle, the hero of our program. i suspect that he really wants to stand out, and his not for nothing. eh, they called it when they were princes. he was given such a strange nickname the black spider, but because he wrote many letters by hand to statesmen , and to significant people, high- ranking officials, and with some wishes in relation to the administration of the state. he gave them advice like a prince of wales and it was a very big deal in 2015 were unsolicited. and no one asked him for sure. i am not at the castle, but i will answer in this spirit. accordingly, in 2015, these letters were made public. and we are convinced that there was nothing dangerous in them, another important thing is that

we have a very active king in front of us, who has been waiting for this moment for 70 years. there, you know, when overripe e, tsar, we had paul the first, who also waited for the throne from catherine ii for more than forty years, did not wait and heaped up, then firewood. well, by the way, here i am from our grandfather, our respected charles iii and george king. well, yes, the second world war began under him, to be honest, of course, britain achieved victory over germany, it was george the seventh who handed the sword to the citizens of stalingrad strong as steel and churchill handed this sword to stalin in tehran and i think yes. i think that today, looking at these personalities of charles iii charles iii theresa may, you know what kind of gnomes they seem like ants compared to

those personalities that were then king george churchill thatcher you are still lustration. we won't talk now. i also wanted to add carl, it's a name free man, that is translate yes free man. and by the way, charles i was executed, his head was cut off because he trampled on freedom, just this is a free man, trampled on freedom and the rights of citizens. and i think that here is mysticism as it is. you see, now we will continue to talk to you. oh, the main topic of our day today, but i want to do a little stuff to invite you. in london, the auleyn theater, where in the repertoire since 2014, mind you, in 2014 there is a performance of corolla king charles iii based on the play by michael barkleet. this is a

shakespearean drama in the best traditions of the five-step pit. well, that is, right as it should, yes, but in some ways and after a 70-year reign, the queen died and charles iii came to the throne for the fourteenth year, i remind you. and what he did the first thing he did quarreled with parliament started a civil war. let's see a fragment from this performance and part of the review of it. my speaker confirm as king i am entitled to do what i have declared within the limits of the power granted to me.

it is striking that the playwright and the year of death queens predicted absolutely exactly 22. and now the promised review, which may not pretend to be the same analytics at all, but nevertheless gives us a british look at the events that take place in this song. waiting in line for the throne more than any other prince of wales in history is determined to be more than just a doormat , and when the leader of the tory position goads him into refusing to sign laws restricting freedom of the press, ignites a constitutional crisis that threatens to put his fate in one next to king charles deftly changes the first, then to satires to a drama about the state of the nation. it touches on many issues, not only about the institution of anarchy in the 21st century, but also about the broader british

identity. so pertinent to the upcoming scottish referendum that it seems like a must visit for everyone on this island. michael perhaps the development of events that is predicted in this song, what do you think? i think not. i think that the situation will continue as it was. ah. i think this is the big one global britain as if in britain they did not dream about it. i think it's impossible to implement. ah ta imperial imperial nostalgia, and that treat you back to british thinking and they still suffer from the loss of the empire. moreover, as, as it was said, that even a click on self-esteem, when a member of a non-commonwealth they leave one by one. look, australia has confirmed its loyalty. yes, she is still silent in new zealand. they just took water in their mouths and are waiting for what will happen, and

as for relations with russia, i think that ah opposition to the new king and the leaf diverges. or maybe it will be even tougher than at the queen's. for the simple reason that we know, we know the attitude of the king towards russia, because remember, when in the fourteenth year, when he spoke, it was true, it was in a private conversation, uh, but it indulged in class when he criticized russia very harshly for the annexation of the crimea and we know that he put it mildly, he is not about good. it's very denounced and i think that in general the anti-russian uh politics uh in the uk will continue and could get worse. they think that britain wanted to tear off the crimea itself , we’ll start to guess what they wanted there, perhaps, such a scenario or not? well, first

of all, i also would like to join the condolences expressed here. is such a scenario possible, but the fact is that on a rational level, of course, i deny mysticism, but , but i adhere to the point of view that if it does not exist, there is no need to quarrel with it, but if it exists, then god knows, then, uh, both carla let's show god cookies. yes, especially, uh, the first one, certainly came into conflict with parliament and some signs that charles iii may be in conflict with parliament exist. ah, including with his passion for environmental protection, let's call it climate stories, from my point of view, rather strange hobbies. but no matter how the monarch would refuse at such an age, he should simply preach conservative ideas, and this was seen as a liberal trip. absolutely yes, what

is now the sheet that proposed hydraulic fracturing? plastov can enter into a confrontation with him definitely not enough, there are indications that he may indeed come into conflict with parliament, simply on the principle of asserting himself and his influence. and what forms, but i don't think, of course, what form it will take. e of the civil war, as under charles the first. and? well, nevertheless, this can lead and then it will be a pity, but to the collapse of the monarchy as an institution. well, actually , it was under charles i. despite the fact that monarchical institutions are preserved in the world, but, perhaps, besides spain, there is another so authoritative and such a prominent royal institution no longer exists japan well, there is also very strong after the forty-fifth year, that's all. yes, there the

emperor's power was undivided now. a sleepy monarchy now one second. i just want to ask you the same question, the scenario is theoretically possible, but in practice, i think you know this young young prince, he has been waiting for his accession to the throne for so long that he is already tired, in my opinion, he is already burned out and uh, while he uh about three or four years ago he was asked about his this green agenda will be promoted green. he, uh, then said, very actively now on all british channels they are reminding, there it is necessary to intervene - i'm not so stupid as to interfere in politics at all. and you know more chances. it would be if a young, ambitious , popular prince, his son, came in now, for example, yes, that is, he burned out, why not refuse in favor of ilya. you know, he was also pushed to this, but still british traditions. there are british traditions

you have to understand, he's really not popular. now this is clear. they try not to say, uh, but uh, the audience remembers princess diana and a lot of other things. you are. and by the way, it all had a very strong influence. and this, popular in britain and all over the world, is the series crown, where it is shown in the last season. frankly , not in the most favorable light. this caused a storm of indignation among the british monarchists, but there was something . well, of course, he will be remembered a lot and what australia has now postponed. notice the discussions about exit from the british crown. you understand postponed they canceled. i am sure that now this process of getting out of the british from under the british. even formal sovereignty. especially in the caribbean countries, there are still uh, well, about a dozen, probably, there are all kinds of islands left. i think it will speed up. well, you know that he got a colossal inheritance from his mother. naturally. eh, he got his son with a colossal

remedy. after he took another title. yes, but and most importantly, the legacy that mother he was left with this last deed of hers. did she approve the rhinestone? that's what i'm thinking here. yes , how much can something be changed inside the state in order for the monarchy to really become, well, much stronger, so that the queen could say no, seeing who is standing in front of her, this is a tanker, but this is not the case . now, she has already met the king. i'm fine. he even learned to nixon. yes, but i really want to see her young. she is charming now, but i think that in her youth she was simply brilliant, because. she has always rejected the idea of ​​a monarchy. let's see how it works with monar. i am not against any of them . personally, i am against the fact that people can inherit power through the family in which

they are born for our country. it's shameful to have such rulers. come on, it was restructured, a typical example also wanted to eliminate the institution of the presidential monarchy. our liberal democrats are here, who in their youth was not a revolutionary or just a liberal here has no heart, who is uh mature years did not become a conservative monarchist has no head here. i think in this respect. and probably he will find e forms of contact and change his attitude to this, especially since there is age, uh, which uh. you have shown here recalls. uh, talking about tumberg. at this age, it’s difficult, generally speaking, to perceive, what can grow out of

the game of this tumberg, if here a liter became the prime minister, i’ll just also get a little into the comments, and into the discussion, but colleagues. look please e, carefully at what you mean they said that the ability to curtsey is actually a very symbolic skill for the british. and the fact that she does it proves that she has accepted the rules of the game. and although my sources. ah, from the uk they tell me, yes, you can laugh, but nevertheless, that the queen queen elizabeth ii met with a sheet of rhinestones out of curiosity, because i would like to see dima an anarchist, as if bowing down to her, but there are about the sheet. uh, i uh, i want to say the following. and now she has colossal hmm and bonus it sounds like it may be a little estimated, but it's true, yes, while

britain is grieving for the queen, the strikes are postponed, the strike of the railroad postal workers. they announced specifically that while mourning, they will not start these tooth strikes, and exactly the same can be said about all economic ones. uh, as if the reforms in the economy sorry, which it was planned, it will come beyond the limit, and so on. how much can she adhere to, and those beliefs and those of her statements that she did we, uh, understand perfectly the problems of the european community that they had after they imposed sanctions against us. it 's obvious. we don't even talk about this, simple simple things, but when we consider our relations with germany in the united states of great britain, we very rarely think about the internal situation.