so what is the skull obtained not by anatoly but by nikolai cherepanov perhaps perhaps this is just a fantasy of captain kulikov does the crystal plant exactly occur through some kind of graph? apparently , some kind of criminal chain is operating at the plant and the dead letters are one of the links in this chain, but nikolai anatoly does not matter. the main thing is that the skull knows where the stolen diamonds are. he now has only one road to the factory. because it can sell such a large portion.

i can't believe it's awful, but what am i doing here. you do you suspect me of anything? no, well, it's my job to ask colleagues who died for possible conflicts and hostility, these are the rules.

marinochka invite the head of departments urgently come in, comrades, come in. hello, a friend from moore is interested in what kind of relationship you had with your side colleague, there may be personal enmity and hostility. lord, what a horror! he 's very recent. this is a big tragedy. recently what? along the corridor i saw him, that's how you are right now . see walking. now here he is dead terribly.

goodbye. good evening on the air big game today is very

important news. the public chambers of the lugansk and donetsk people's republics came to the donbas and called for not postponing the referendum on joining russia until the complete liberation of the territory of the dpr and holding it immediately, as they say in these appeals. well, also about the expediency of holding a referendum, as soon as possible, said the deputy head of the administration of the kherson region kirill stremausov. after all this, the head of the donetsk people's republic, denis pushin, discussed with his luhansk colleague leonid pasechnik, the need to coordinate and synchronize further steps to organize referendums. and, if these referendums are held in the near future and russia recognizes their results, and we naturally have no doubts about the results, then this can fundamentally change the nature of the special operation, and how russia will perceive the actions of the kiev regime and its western patrons, and the possibilities changes in the nature of the war in ukraine are also being spoken about in the united states.

that russia can allegedly either use weapons of mass destruction in ukraine or directly open war with nato here is the first topic about weapons of mass destruction that president biden raised in his sixty-minute interview with cbs. look, don't do it, don't do it. do not do it. you will change the face of war like nothing since world war ii. do you think i would tell you, if i knew for sure, of course i won't tell you in the consequences will they become big outcasts in the world. than ever were and depending on the scope of what they do we will determine what the answer will be and i want to say that this is not a random answer to a random question of a journalist. uh, united states ambassador to ukraine bridget brink. today she already announced that washington is already discussing with other western countries a response plan in the event that russia uses nuclear weapons in ukraine. despite the fact that

there are simply no prerequisites for the use of non- chemical chemicals in russia, there are no nuclear weapons in ukraine. well, finally, head of the joint chiefs of staff of the united states mark miley, visiting a base in poland late last week, which is used just to support ukraine, checked its air defense system and urged american military personnel to be more vigilant in case russia decides to attack this nato base in poland, most likely in omnipotent. what do you think is the reason for such an aggravation of the rhetoric about the escalation in the united states and whether they are actually preparing the ground for such an escalation, because the issue of providing fourth-generation f-16 fighter aircraft to ukraine and a. ukraine demands long-range missiles. yes , the biden administration has not yet provided them, but nevertheless, russia has indicated that this is the latest red line. in general, is the united states preparing the ground for

some kind of escalation for some kind of escalation of conflicts? i think that they are, of course, preparing, because we are witnessing the evolution of escalation, indeed the involvement of the united states in this conflict. at first they said what to deliver here. only not a lethal weapon, that was at about it. then , after all, trump is a little bit of a javelin. here are the divins, then the stingers. and as they say, appetite comes with eating, and they think, well, let's let's check. how long can we do this and how long will russia tolerate this. i think that this is a probing, firstly, of the limit of our tolerance, and on the other hand. this, of course, is also a probing. and really, how much they can equip with new weapons. uh, the ukrainian

armed forces, especially since they're around. of the ukrainian armed forces created the legend myth that it is generally the victorious great army. these are the generals, almost napoleon is there, there are still some of these laid down and etc. mythologization is going on, public opinion is being prepared in the west and in the usa and in other places. true, america cannot be taken so easily, after all, this country is more complex. we know this, but every second european, like this uh burbock and others. they fight for us, they die for us. we must do everything to ensure that they have everything, that is, the impression that in general the entire western world does not have any internal problems. one problem exists today and the main problem in the world. it

's to defeat russia and support ukraine and ukraine is used as a cudgel and ukraine what tools to use to bleed russia i think you know what most likely. and such contradictory statements by biden. either we are already or western analysts, or we are already in a war, or we are preparing for a war, or all the time they are thus involved in the war. not in vain broke warns in poland that it is better to be vigilant. it seems to me that there is such a saying on the thief and the hat is on fire. it seems to me that we have a situation with this. speaking of which, pay attention. russia, on the other hand, never talks about nuclear weapons at all, moreover, the russian military doctrine excludes the possibility of using nuclear weapons in such conflicts

, only the united states talks about this, but i completely agree with you to keep track of what the united states is trying in any case, escalating, not escalating, but dragging out dragging out this military conflict. but often we blame american diplomats. in a lie recently bridget brink went to the united states told the truth. she said that the information that the united states is allegedly putting pressure on kiev in order to move towards a policy of diplomatic settlement is a clear lie. here, here, i can fully agree with the ambassador of the united states to ukraine states and within nato, and on a significant increase in the american military presence in the countries of central eastern europe, this is supposedly only a reaction in response to the russian special operation in ukraine at the end of last week in

estonia, a meeting of the chiefs of general staffs was held. uh, the nato countries were there, of course, the general. mark milli. so, a very interesting confession was made during this meeting by the head of the military committee. nato admiral baller at this meeting. here, listen to what he said. we discussed the most extensive overhaul our military structures since 1949 planning for this started a few years ago. now we are putting these plans into practice. the most significant change after 1949, which was mentioned by the baller, yes, is the decision of this year's nato summit in madrid on a really significant increase in the american and nato military presence in the so-called pre-flank countries. poland, the baltic states, romania, and so on, a significant expansion of military infrastructure, military headquarters infrastructure and deployment even there on a permanent basis.

basis of armaments. and it turns out that they planned it for several years very cool. yes , evgeny petrovich is a good statement. e evgeny mikhailovich yes, which actually gives. it seems to me that the answers to a lot of questions and why and how to respond to russian security guarantee demands, and who really provoked this, er, ukrainian conflict, what do you think? you understand this statement, but there are some absolutely deep things about what is going on in the united states throughout. several years there was an understanding that they were losing the economic race, and analysts and politicians talked about this, and it was necessary to get out of this situation, losing china to china, i read, of course, to get out through such a throw, primarily in the technological sphere. and they remember very well how

the first world war, the second world war allowed them to reach a completely different level each time, since in the conditions of peaceful stable competition there was no chance, they needed a conflict , moreover, a big conflict, and they prepared it what he said is a confirmation of how they prepared this conflict that this conflict could have been avoided, but the keys were not with us they did not want to use these keys for anything. and now, without any doubt, it is necessary to prolong the conflict, because this meets their macro-tasks, both economic and technological, as far as these small countries are concerned. they put the old weapons, which they had primarily of soviet production. and now they will be forced

to nato obligations. they have buy weapons from the middle balls. that is, it will be another push for the economy for the us military-industrial complex, so this is all well thought out, but a strategy. which can only be answered by grinding this technique, of course, and in fact, more and more confirmations are coming that the policy that the united states pursued was the result of the ukrainian crisis. this is an absolutely deliberate policy, and it has begun. this is from the expansion of nato to the east. yes, agree the first seeds the current conflict in europe was sown in the mid-nineties, when the clinton administration began a policy of nato expansion to the east. contrary to all russian warnings that this would inevitably lead to a new

consultation, by the way, american realists, not only russian to all, said that this policy would inevitably lead to the conflict that we are today, but we are seeing here as well. i can't even say that the united states doesn't sort of learn from its mistakes. yes they are not draw conclusions of their own in this case, they are simply open. they say that it was their policy that led to what it led to, and if this policy had not been carried out, so to speak, it would have supposedly only been worse, about this completely, uh, the former president of the united states recently openly stated bill clinton during the presidency, which actually these seeds of evil , uh, were sown. e in europe in his interview with farid zakaria, a well-known american scientist. a and. a. farid zakaria. actually asked bill clinton does not believe that the policy of nato expansion was wrong because. here she led to the

current conflict in ukraine and listen to what bill clinton said today i am even more convinced that we did the right thing president putin did not hide. what he considers the collapse of the soviet union to be a great tragedy in world history did not hide that, in his opinion, khrushchev made a mistake by transferring crimea to ukraine, that he gave it to ukraine. sorry , but i do not agree with you. i think that we did the right thing at the right time, if we did not, the crisis could occur even earlier. speaking about the fact that the crisis could have happened even earlier. clinton is probably hinting that if nato expansion had not taken place, russia would probably have attacked the baltic states and so on. here, as in this paradigm, you can generally talk about anything, i must say that he is not only a bastard in family relations and in relations with

women, because, well, dozens of books of films and so on, where women and men who generally die children had a relationship. by the way, he is still with this weinstein. uh, or well, pedophilia, that is, what only he was not involved in his life and now he is lying in an absolutely shameless way, because hmm first, how russia could attack whom and in what state do you remember the beginning of the nineties . the country was generally in a half-life . she couldn't herself at all. well, remember, zhenya, we said that russia is a country with limited sovereignty and, in fact, the americans took guardianship over us. i had this image. here,

when there are two boxers in the clinch, but with real boxing, both tired and trying to get some rest, and in this boxing, just like marlon brando said. eh, queens, i say, keep the road closer to you, and the enemy is even closer, here he is. they kept us and we didn’t even feel it. we may not find. what can we do in this state. russia could never do anything . i believe they showed absolutely. monstrous irresponsibility i once called in my article one of clinton 's politics as the politics of petty thieves on the tram, who pulls e money if it lies badly, there and so

on, because they did not have the mind to include russia, because then they were just discussing it. uh, these monstrous questions related to the versailles peace, that russia should not be drawn into versailles, because we know what happened after versailles, the germans, offended, humiliated, they said, no, we do not agree with such a world, and then putin came and said, we do not agree with such a world. and all the nineties they humiliated us, mocked us. and of course he was when he was great in chicago speaking in front of the poles he said, yes, we will support if more joins nato, and boris nikolaevich was in poland and said. yes, we do not mind at all if you join nato later. of course, everyone here went crazy. how did he say that, but he already said, and therefore no. in fact, russia was not

a threat to the west, and especially the americans did everything to turn russia into an enemy from a friend here in this country. everyone adored america, everyone was just thinking how we could create the best relationship. in his successively anti-russian activities, they made russia their enemy. well, it seems to me that the united states and the big enemy did not act on the level of north korea. even worse than a thief in a tram, because a thief in a tram is trying to steal unnoticed. they did it quite openly defiantly, based on the fact that russia will never be able to fight back, based on the fact that russia never because they thought they wrote off russia, this is the mental mistake that they made. well, if the united states believe that the prolongation of the ukrainian conflict. e will weaken russia, then such confidence

about another important instrument of american policy in the framework of a hybrid war, namely sanctions. they no longer have. here cnn once again reported with reference to high-ranking officials of the bytan administration that the sanctions would not work, since it was planned that they hated russia in the short term, the damage that economic damage, uh, that the authors of the sanctions were counting on economic blitz that the sanctions didn't turn most russians against the kremlin, which they also do. they openly say that this was one of the, uh, calculations. well, now, uh, in the baidan administration they think that we still have to wait for some time, and next year, probably, the sanctions will still apply, but for work, yes, not right away, but uh, in the end, uh, they will earn vladimir dmitrievich and you share this forecast. here, taking into account the fact that countries not from the west, the countries of the east and south are not going

to limit their economic interaction with russia well, i would probably start with such a philosophical thing, about which a lot of people think, but you understand, here. by and large, if we consider, so to speak, the holy scriptures yes, then the economic life of a person began with his expulsion of israel, in fact, began as sanctions , of course, we will not notice this, but nevertheless. human life. it is all the time built on the fact that he overcomes obstacles, overcoming this limitation, striving to improve his life and improve e-well-being for himself for his close to the society in which he lives. it seems to me today, when the western countries are really, so to speak, introducing this frantic one. i would say so. the war against russia is sanctioned. they do not take into account precisely, uh , so to speak, the depreciation capacity of the economy, as a phenomenon in general, as a social

phenomenon of a person’s ability to recover, therefore, it is natural that such growing countries that we see today, e on east in asia and, in fact, there with the center for economic growth, look at what growth rates are in countries southeast asia uh india 13.5% gdp growth year on year. yes, that means almost 3% growth in china since and that is, so to speak, on the wave of this, so to speak, powerful anti-covid program. uh, we see the same thing in other countries, that is, the growth rates in europe, so to speak, are close to zero and almost negative already, which, apparently . maybe the third quarter. it may turn out to be favorable in the us in terms of growth rates, of course, economic growth shifts there, and when economic growth shifts to these countries, then the normal rational behavior of these countries continued cooperation. they need energy. them.

we need partners. them. need products products. uh, we need not only our grain, so to speak, oil gas, uh, which ensure their growth. and even india, as for today, pays a lot of attention. not that we are talking more about china, yes, of course, china is a very powerful partner of russia, but we should also look at india, which is today. this is , firstly, a diversified economy, no matter what we say about it, so to speak, the gap in the standard of living of people, but still, there, tens of millions are measured by the number of people who live, in general, at the level of millions of states, and and uh, this country is technologically advanced in both trade and industrial and of course, uh, of course , them for such a population, which is about to become the first population in the world. uh, they also need resources. and uh, that would be naive. e

expect that now they will refuse this and will e go the beaten path, so to speak, which, so to speak, is offered from the outside. the west is, firstly, secondly, well, we remember, so i agree with evgeny mikhailovich about what we are watching, that this is a protracted process, a long one, that the search for enemies is a search, so to speak , economic, so to speak, understanding that that the economy is lagging behind. well, let's remember, of course, the seventies-eighties, when there was an uptrend in japan when in america they wrote in newspapers with horror that they were the rockefeller center, so to speak, the symbol of new york was sold to the japanese, then these remained in american cinema traces of japanese capital in the united states of america then this wave came down. they managed to overcome this and japan today, as an economic competitor , there is no such obvious competitor, but uh, uh, literally still literary from uh, so to speak, distractions, and in the nineteenth year at 75 years, in fact, the creation of an international

monetary fund, and then they published such a funny article in his magazine. e, partly caricatured as e, one of the founders of the british woods agreements, the famous english economist john mainer case came to the then to the head of the imf, christingard, and they have such a semi-fictional semi, possibly having documentary evidence from historical documents of the conversation and the case, allegedly. in this conversation. says invented that i warned my partner harry white, who led the negotiations on the creation of the russian system by the united states, that the united states is far from always. that is to have a positive trading balance. and now we see it, therefore, as soon as the negative trade balance began to build up in the united states, economic. the europe that we see today, so to speak, with the wave of a wand, so to speak, from washington, is turning from uh economies living on cheap energy resources to

economies that live on expensive resources. this is russia, this is, of course, china, uh, and uh, an attempt. the economic revenge of overcoming economic partners, naturally, pushes them to political adventures, with which therefore sanctions are doomed to failure, they are difficult to overcome. they create nothing favorable, but they force people, still overcome them and this is inevitable. well, uh, i think it's a problem. here it also lies in the fact that the countries of the west still cannot realize the limit of their own hegemony, that it has ended, that the big world, the big east , the big south, they no longer obey. and that's what we'll talk about after a short advertisement. on the 350th anniversary of peter the great, andrew the first-

called founded a fort and named st. petersburg. closer to the king, you need to stand around him now breathe new people. here even the air is special favorite of the great cinema cathedral from september 26 at the first toothpick.

with polaris smart technology, order in the house, delicious dinner and healthy sleep, everything for your comfort with discounts up to 60 percent on wildberries

wonderful wonderful and now and fix this position, hold on, hold on wonderfully. and now i can’t change konstantin i’m in the opening, if the rate is fixed, for everyone it’s no longer possible to change the cash loan at a fixed rate of 8.9% for everyone this opening. new technologies for fast solutions non-contact payment for refueling through a mobile application network of

gas stations gazpromneft gazpromneft stop for those who do not stop connect loved ones to the tariff at half price, watch videos endlessly and for free or get more internet in roaming without additional payments beeline 30 years. on your side, the prospect is an opportunity to see the new in the old, and with a credit card from uralsib, it's easy to bring it to life and not think about interest. issue a credit card for 120 days without interest and get a year of free service. uralsib prospects, where you are at any unclear situation. write to the robot max applying for a european protocol online is easier than it seems public services the national project of the digital economy.

vtb will offer dad to decide for a month of gatherings on friday from a reliable bank. order a free card to receive 1,000 rubles. right now. switch to vtb and that's it, it will turn out to be the cause of the disease as a source of infection, forcing us to isolate ourselves from loved ones, the virus breaks our lives and sars already 2 hours after taking it. acting on the cause of the illness at the base. start treatment on time protect yourself and loved ones. a cash loan with a

fixed rate of 8.9 each this is the opening music of the fall what where when the autumn series of games from september 25 at the first in the big game big bookmaker general partner of the russian premier league big game on the air and until the break. we talked about the fact that it is extremely difficult for the countries of the west. and, of course , it is unpleasant to realize that their hegemony on a global scale is no more, and they cannot mobilize the majority of humanity against

russia, and it seems to me a very vivid illustration this inability will be a high-level week in the united nations general assembly that opens tomorrow and ahead of that opening. vasily nebenzya is constantly a representative of russia, and he just said that there is and will not be any isolation of russia within the un and that the demand for a meeting with sergey lavrov , russian foreign minister who will just represent russia this high- level week is the same as was always and nebente absolutely right and the most interesting thing is that against attempts by the united states to isolate russia against a hybrid war against russia against the policy of sanctions. entering, including very close partners of the united states in this very non-western world, and among them such countries as the south african republic. and mexico just recently. ah. joe biden met with president cyril ramaphos of south africa in washington and during

this meeting, president romaphos criticized the united states for us attempts to put south africa in front of a choice of either or or the west or russia in that including using a bill currently under consideration in congress, and countering malicious russian actions in africa well, of course, everything russia does is malicious. here. e. listen to what cyril ramos said in this regard at a meeting with the president of the united states. we are concerned about the possible repercussions for the african continent if a bill to counter malicious russian actions is passed by the united states that could have undesirable consequences for the african continent for their efforts to stimulate their development and growth. africa can only be punished for having such a partner, just as russia would be unfair for the united states to punish african countries for

economic and business ties with russia, it is also important to add that seryl ramofosa said that both the united states and russia are strategic africa's partners and uh, south africa is a sovereign state that pursues an independent foreign policy in turn. uh, president of mexico, uh, lopez instrumentation in anticipation of this week's high-level general assembly, he is, in principle, openly open. and the policy of supplying weapons to ukraine and the policy of western sanctions, which are both, according to the abrador. uh, leads to the incitement and prolongation of the conflict in the interests of western countries, listen, how is it that, on the one hand, ukraine is denied membership in the alliance, and on the other hand, they offer it weapons, they impose sanctions against russia, this only aggravates the conflict, adds to the suffering, to the victims

and refugees exacerbates food and energy shortages and accelerates global inflation. all this causes damage to the vast majority of the peoples of the world, the great powers. they openly or tacitly position themselves in the face of the conflict in ukraine just to serve their money. they have interests, so it is impossible not to suspect that this is a war? although it seems, it is in the interest of the military industry that it is perverted and unbelievable. vladimir alekseevich and this is what the president of mexico and the president of south africa say: they are not allowed at all suspected of anti-american politics. this is not iran, nor north korea, nor nicaragua, not even russia. how do you assess, well, i completely agree with you, but here we need to highlight a few words that are fundamentally important first hygiene policy. yes, injustice represent what categories. yes, today we have a philosophical mood. so it is necessary to continue justice. yes , overcoming, after all, russia and china today they are talking about

building a more equitable world order. what are the colleagues from mexico from south africa accused of, and the americans because they are unfairly forcing these to make a choice that this is an unfair hemonic war. yes, what is happening in the world is global. the fact is that the united states is really interested in conflicts today only through conflicts. they may delay the transition for some time. e world in a new stage of international relations only conflicts a large number of conflicts, which, it seems to them, are still at least somewhat manageable. uh, they can support this conditional, decrepit hegemony. that is why the united states is undermining the situation in eastern europe. that is why this happened in taiwan. probably why this is happening on the kyrgyz-tajik

border . . that 's the second question, and it's very important, and the second thing you said about the united nations . yes, indeed, the united states is now trying to, uh, transform the security council. they propose a general assembly in essence. delete russia the security council has become, but we are, so to speak, not in the lottery. yes, as churkin said, they won. that's right. we deserved the veto of the security council with blood, stories of defending our motherland of the whole world from hitler from world war ii as a result of the victory in the great patriotic war in world war ii. we became the founder of the un security council as they imagine the functioning of this body without us. this is the first question, and the second question is whether the americans have forgotten that the united states are just the location of the headquarters of the united nations, this

can be changed. and finally, the third very important point. the whole history of international relations shows that when at least one great power is a world power, a power. there is no composition, uh, actors making decisions about the system. it is excluded from the system of international relations, which leads to an absolute imbalance. conflicts and the league ends badly, ended badly. and this lesson is history unequivocally. you have to remember of course, americans don't really like history, but uh , they will have to remember this lesson for a long time, because the strategic miscalculations that are now being played against them in the long term, the world is slowly, probably, seeing the light. and it's not just the eastern reaction. agree. i hope that there will be another opportunity to talk about it, but this is also the western world. in general, the whole world as a whole will see more and more clearly, if you like, when europe begins to see clearly, there is already great discontent there. so far we really

we observe that while the countries of the east and the south are striving to strengthen their sovereignty, and this also applies to mexico and south africa and turkey and iran, i’m not talking about india china russia the countries of europe, including even the uk, behave completely differently and somehow lose their sovereignty and subjectivity. today ended the ceremony of farewell to elizabeth ii of great britain yes, when she ascended the throne, great britain was still an empire over which the sun did not set. and today king charles iii yes, and today elizabeth was buried there came a lot of foreign guests, including president biden, including president macron, well, even how this ceremony took place shows the changed place of the uk on the world stage. after all. pay attention even during this farewell ceremony, great britain quarreled with mohammed

bin salman. he left early. er, because er, the saudi delegation and the crown prince himself and the de facto leader of the kingdom were banned from participating in all. and so to speak aspects of this ceremony, the chinese embassy was not allowed. and also today, the british media uh, announced that the uk will gradually shut down. all confucius institutes are in their own country, and yevgeny mikhailovich will hire teachers from taiwan as teachers of the chinese language well, to me, this, to be honest, does not seem to me the policy of global britain such a global britain that london proclaimed when leaving the european union , to me this, honestly speaking, it resembles the foreign policy style of lithuania oval. of such great importance uh moment at the funeral of the

esteemed queen, and the uk has your place. and this place is primarily due to the fact that it is the most favored ally of the united states in any other country. there is no such interweaving by the united states, what kind of great britain and they? after they lost the empire, by the way, speaking of an understudied story about how the united states helped to lose the empire, they helped, but the british stepped over this and through the military cooperation through the cooperation of the special services. it's almost like one state and this is what you need to see, and i wouldn't say let us assume that british diplomacy is diplomacy. which, as it were, can be

ignored, you know, the british have such a deeply rooted notion that yes, of course, we are much weaker than the united states, no doubt, but we are smarter. and in some global things they try to tell the great partner how to act, and in this, they also find their own. well, like a sense of significance. and this is what you need to see. that is, there, yes, it is a nation that has its own complexes, there is no doubt about it. and here they are these complexes. here so they treat them. well, i completely agree. it's literally a second now that, of course, the united kingdom is the closest close ally of the united states, yes. they have tremendous cooperation at the level of intelligence and not only intelligence, and the uk remains a nuclear state, a large economy and a permanent member of the security council, but i

don’t see the uk’s independent policy today yes, it follows the lead of the united states yes, it closely consults with the united states. not the fact that the united the us is also in close consultation with the uk. and when britain acts in accordance with this concept of influence from within, which you mentioned, it often does not strengthen, but weakens british world positions . for example, tony blair just said at one time, yes, that here we are in great britain together with the united states. and uh, the grandiose global american power is strengthening, including the british influence here is the story of cancer and the personal history of tony blair, for whom iraq was actually the end of his once brilliant political career, showed that this was not the case. here is andrew when it should. so i don’t see that the uk is now acting exactly as global i have known for 100 years. and, of course, i rarely happen, i don’t

agree, but here i just totally disagree with what he said, just maybe, because lately i have been reading a lot about china , about england, about the usa and especially relations between the usa and england firstly. in the general opinion of all leading specialist analysts and so on britain ended as a great power in the fifty-sixth year of the suez crisis. and who drove the last nail into the coffin of this great power, nikita sergeevich and the president, the eisenhower crisis, yes, when the secular channel really nationalized us and suddenly they three states wanted to invade there, israel england france so that london would not be there it all

ended. this is the first. second, i must say that in great britain this is a myth created about the special relationship between england and the united states by churchill himself. it clearly. i know it, his mother was an american, he overdid it during the war and sold it, but understand we are together. we are one nation. we are here you save us, because otherwise the germans will destroy us on their own. in general, the whole world will be under germany third. you know, in american society there is a very strong anti-british sentiment among a large number of american citizens,

even those with roots who come from the uk , well, first of all. the irish, who can't stand the british, and now there are almost more of them than the anglo-saxons themselves. secondly, the anglo-saxons today are not the majority even for the white population of the united states; the germans, the main part of the white population of the united states , are third. and in great britain they have neither had nor have their place in international relations. she never found it. she did not find herself inside europe and does not find herself outside, because outside he is just like a six. by the way, it’s good that you brought this prime minister, but who else was so pejoratively called a putel poodle poodle, to the souls of the youngest, but

do you really call his partner that way in the american press and the english press, so it 's a myth. the british, of course, today it is absolutely degenerate, especially in political terms, it is enough to look at each of the politicians, is today's uk a rhinestone in front of a sheet of cuts, or what? boris johnson is not a face, it's not a face, it's incomprehensible. what is it like? eh, it's like gogol said. these are some incomprehensible faces, in general. these are caricature images, once, great power. i adored this country political culture political traditions. from there was nothing left the uk degenerated that's what happened. here

the uk is determined to fight china and yes to move closer to taiwan u bbc u reports that the pound uh fell to a 37-year low against the dollar, and due to the collapse of retail sales in the uk in august, in turn, which were the result of, uh, the energy and general economic crisis, but even more dramatic energy crisis is observed in germany spiegel right on the cover of his the last issue predicts that germany will face difficult years, an energy crisis, a severe economic depression and, as a result of segregation, a segmentation of society, a middle-class crisis and even civil discontent and protests. the guardian reports that due to lack of gas. uh, one of the giants of german

industry, the chemical content of basses, can stop in germany, and completely. and this will have consequences not only for germany, but also for uh, all of europe, and the european commission and the german government, headed by chancellor scholz. they say that europe and germany will survive this winter, because here scholz constantly insists that the gas storage facilities are 85% full, yes, and accordingly, everything, as it were, yes, according to scholz, they are safe. uh, vladimir dmitrievich so it turns out that ishpigel and gardin and other observers they dramatize the situation too much and decide not to finish something , otherwise i read it too. e articles. eh, they really are. now there is a lot in assessing the situation in germany. well, i have the feeling that i don’t even know what is more hypocrisy or tyopkoy, because on the one hand, what is going through europe today, what is happening in germany is direct a consequence of a systematic long-term policy of, so to speak,

mastering the energy market of europe by the united states of america, as from the moment when active shale gas production began in the usa, when they understood that they could from the country, who are completely dependent on gas imports can become exporters, and they have become exporters from now on. actually, we see this uh, an active onslaught on europe on the one hand, but on the other hand. and i really do not publish and every time laments. how so, it means what should germany do because prices are high, because it means, er, so to speak, they can stop due to expensive gas, and industrial enterprises. moreover, after all, we must understand that there is a certain such ideologization of the economy, uh, which is actively including, uh, they are pushing, uh, and in europe, here we

are talking about the uk, we are talking, so to speak, about their assessments. well, just the other day, the magazine icons of places means another article on how to overcome the energy crisis in europe, uh, it is noteworthy that this article says one of the ways out, one of the recipes. we will remember. yes, russia and the president has repeatedly suggested this. do not base your policy on spot prices. let us enter into long-term contacts for oil, gas and and so on, but every time the answer is fat. so in this article the iconography says that in order to solve the energy crisis. it is necessary to consider the possibility of concluding long-term contracts with electricity producers of alternative energy sources, that is, renewable. to the source of e, taking into account wind generation, which means, first of all, or it’s sunny there, and so on, thereby supporting them, that is, they understand that investments in these industries require predictable long-term contracts, but at the same time they

with maniacal persistence, the cathars refuse long-term contracts to russia; there, long-term contracts cut themselves off; cheap energy resources, on which, in fact, germany actually grew up, and so we talked here about problems, so to speak, yes, which, uh, arise not independent from europe or there, for example , active resistance of asian countries, because we see that today, including what sanctions are, after all, sanctions are an attempt to limit economic sovereignty quite a lot of state, however, against whom they are directed this restriction, let's say russia but at the same time. why are the representatives of her ar indignant? why are we returning with the representatives of mexico because through indirect sanctions they are deprived of economic sovereignty. and this is already something that we have talked about many times, it has not been avoided, yes, in fact, and therefore and therefore, naturally, this whole chain, this whole

machine of successive actions, is a vicious circle, in the end it really leads to a very serious economic problem. europe, we see there et ts rise in prices ee producer prices for products. uh, there in germany 33%, there is an increase in, uh, prices for uh, products, uh for manufacturers 37% of producer prices. uh, therefore, naturally, such inflation, it leads to serious consequences today, by the way, there was also a good article about what is likely to give. auto. so, as they say, yes, the german one is also ending, because, uh, if we all switch to electric cars, where will germany be left with their own, so smart cars. it a crisis. we will now pause for a moment, and then we will talk about those countries, both in europe and beyond, that are still fighting for their maturation. in the early morning of february 24, we woke up

in a different world. i stood at the place where people died and i had no more questions. the premiere of the film by alexandra frank was visited by westerners and began to bathe when the ukraine airport began to be bombed. we then saw the bones. here is our earth, we will not leave. we won't leave, transfers money to the front, so we have mine detectors of the chronicle. we counted the start

special military operation. for us, this means the end of the war home. on sunday at the first it was good for me to celebrate my birthday in the basement. and what did you think, and what else would i think during the bombing? well, something really good. why do i invest the best opportunities always in a crisis is it time to learn new investments? install the tinkoff investment application, complete the course and receive a package of shares worth up to 20,000 rubles as a gift. tinkoff he is one of a kind. each other

titan tele2 and xiaomi one day to benefit could get a subscriber, everyone can change the minutes of wear and it is profitable to buy xiaomi smartphones any minute is equal to two rubles, this in the whole world for the first time becomes the cause of the disease as a source of infection, forcing us to isolate ourselves from loved ones in the mainstream breaks our lives and sars already 2 hours after admission. acting on the cause of the illness at the base. start treatment on time protect yourself and loved ones. the prospect is an opportunity to see the new in the old, and with a

credit card from uralsib it is easy to bring it to life and not think about interest. apply for a credit card 120 days without interest and get a year of free service, uralsib prospects where you are. i bought cereals from the sale on ozone, buckwheat at the fork in packages for only 9 rubles. for children's dishes and vegetables for 69 rubles. there are people who always want more than just life, but a plus life plus more miles plus more confidence. plus more power updated ecto fuel plus from lukoil more pluses more efficiency. and you and you and me and you and each cash loan with a

fixed rate of 8.9 each is an opening. when you need to sell a car, most of the doors are the safest service for selling cars , the vtb team will offer a solution at school, you’ve bought your dad, you’ll have to live a month without gatherings on fridays on snowmobiles, dear. we live in the city center with a card for every day from a reliable bank. order a free card to receive 1,000 rubles. for everything you are used to and paying utility bills without a commission. order a free vtb card right now. go to vtb everything will work out on the website or in the citylink application thousands of different products for competitive prices, for example, a smart wi-fi robot vacuum cleaner polaris with a discount of 5,000 rubles.