good evening, the big game is on air today , president vladimir putin granted russian citizenship to edward snowden, an american who provided evidence of the american big lie about secret cia prisons about total surveillance. behind everyone, including the german chancellor and so on , angela merkel and much more. and unfortunately, lies are still one of the leading tools of american politics. and now, right before our eyes, the united states wants to completely pervert the essence of russian warnings about

that russia will defend its borders with all available means. and they try to create an impression in front of american citizens that nothing threatens them, that they are safe. and if russia does something somewhere, then in ukraine, and this, it seems to me, is a deliberate misleading of everyone. in moscow for many days in a row in clear text every day. they say that they consider the united states and american satellites as a party to the conflict in ukraine, and kiev is only an instrument. proxy along with meanwhile, this week the nature of this military conflict may fundamentally change after the announcement of the results of the referendum in the dpr of the lpr in the kherson zaporozhye regions and the probable acceptance of these regions into russia moscow will have every reason to declare that the west is no longer just a party to the ukrainian conflict, but to the war against

russia on russian territory. and this prospect certainly put the west in a very difficult position, how to continue to support ukraine and at the same time not be drawn into direct military the clash with russia is still here, apparently, the following such approach is looming , we will not change the policy regarding the ukrainian conflict, but at the same time we will in every possible way inflate a completely false hysteria with the fact that russia can allegedly apply. ukraine has tactical nuclear weapons, well , it threatens russia with all sorts of mythical consequences. on the one hand, secretary of state anthony blinkin said yesterday that not only will the united states never recognize the incorporation of the new four regions into russia, but that ukraine has the right to return them. but watch the ternal with reference to representatives of the biden administration, writes that washington does not require kiev to refrain from using american weapons to shell those territories that may become

part of russia following the results of referendums. this is on the one hand, and on the other hand, the united states, as never before, has increased public and non-public pressure on russia about the invented image. threats to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine in one day. already two statements on this topic made the adviser to the president of the united states to sullivan and the third statement of the secretary of state. damn here. in particular, what jake sullivan said, in his interview with abc tv channel, we directly and privately conveyed to the russians at a very high level that the consequences for russia would be catastrophic if they adopted nuclear weapons in ukraine, we were frank with them and emphasized that the united states will give a decisive answer together with our allies and partners. they understand what they will face if they continue on this dark path, we have designated russian. what will be the consequences, but we are careful how we talk about it publicly, because

we want to indicate that it will have disastrous consequences, but not to fight the russians accept our position. we understand our position. we have a plan for every eventuality, and we will do what is necessary to prevent such a move by russia in such a case. our response will be decisive. well, and in approximately the same spirit, secretary of state anthony blenkin also spoke. e in an interview with cbs. and uh, blinkin also confirmed that the united states allegedly has a plan for the eventuality of nuclear weapons in ukraine, andronik vassestvievych, when not russia. er, don't you think that this hysteria with nuclear weapons in ukraine is due to the fact that the united states is trying in every possible way to avoid something that could stabilize both the ukrainian crisis and russian-american relations and international security in general, namely fear. they are not trying to keep

fear out of american society. after all , if this fear arose, then the united states they introduced themselves in a completely different way under the pressure of american society, and blinkin, he says, we will not get involved in a fight. yes, that is, even if something like this happens, it will happen in ukraine, they say, nothing threatens at all. do you agree or do you have some other other interpretation of such a build-up of nuclear fears, do you know? everything you say is really true, but here i just think what happened from the very beginning of the conflict, because in the west there are many, fled from our country. the so-called pseudo-analysts wrote and said, do not let putin blackmail with nuclear weapons, and therefore,

if there is such a threat, washington must declare that we are ready, we will use nuclear weapons , the consequences will be catastrophic, the most interesting thing is that russia has never stated that it is preparing to use weapons in ukraine it is quite possible for russia to win the war in ukraine without nuclear weapons and therefore you only need to be crazy in order to use nuclear weapons in the territory, which here is our backyard . these are our people. we have always said that sooner or later these territories will become part of russia , well, why do we need to do all this, but it seems to me that they are really right that they themselves

launched this duck. yeah, they immediately dropped that russia cannot win the war and therefore russia will inflict or will use tactical nuclear weapons. they discuss it themselves. they themselves oppose it and they themselves threaten crushing ones. therefore, it seems to me that this is what it can be response from our side our president has repeatedly said in which case we can use nuclear weapons. this is written in our doctrine recently today, in my opinion, rybkova has been quoting all day, who says everyone knows from our doctrine, when can we apply. we did not have such a plan, and in general it is not foreseen. yes, but we have a different plan, and indeed, but our

opponents also know this, we will apply it, unless, of course, the americans create it. the existential problem for the existence of the russian state is already applicable not about ukrainians absolutely absolutely, but there are such beautiful cities for this, london uh, washington i don't know boston i really love these cities. i would not want them to be destroyed, but i think that nikita sergeevich should have once predestined the year 1956, but what is it that these englishmen are here. eh, totally screwed up. how many bombs does it take for london not to exist, therefore? i think this is an attempt to play for a big escalation. this is an attempt. this is what

we often remember what americans call chicken game, that is, who will blink first, but for washington they are afraid that they will suddenly say, but we blinked, and russia took over and putin will consider himself the winner. if we suddenly say that we won’t now, they are trying to show ahead of time, here we are, what tough guys, especially before the elections, especially after the shameful flight from afghanistan, we need some kind of virtual or rhetorical victory and, in fact, the american administration for this work . well, yes, here i want to emphasize again, yes, and completely i agree with andronikova nasledovich vladimir vladimirovich putin in his address in his speech, where he announced partial mobilization, he never

mentioned the word nuclear weapons at all, in principle, this time. secondly, today, indeed, sergei alekseevich ryabkov , deputy foreign minister of russia, said that there were no changes to the approach. but russia does not have the possibility of using nuclear weapons. and what the united states should figuratively uh, very beautiful. it seems to me that you put it sergey alekseevich and neglect, that is, cool down, yes, and stop pumping up, and the situation from the statements of both putin and lavrov and patrushev follows a different one, that we consider the united states to be a party to the conflict hence, it does not follow at all, but the threat of application. i am a tactical nuclear weapon. on the territory of ukraine, this implies a completely different thing. yes, what can we at a certain stage, but think about

how to strike at the centers of acceptance solutions. actually, how many times did he say, and doesn’t it seem to you that nikolai yuryevich is switching arrows? from the war of the west against russia, because it seems to me that, including at the un general assembly, russia managed to form and strengthen this narrative that the west is waging war against russia using ukraine as a proxy and in part to break this narrative in part, just to switch attention . and, of course, in order to demonize russia in the eyes, and russian partners, china, india, and so on. here they are now completely by the ears they are trying to artificially attribute to russia supposedly. the intention to use tactical nuclear weapons, so i completely agree with you. i would add one more thing. in my opinion, the united states is categorically unwilling to acknowledge and unwilling to accept this. and they do n't even want to. even silently agree with this that

they are a party to the conflict in ukraine, because they proceed from the fact, and they are trying to approve such an order in which they are the sheriff, and russia is the violator. they want as well symbolically and politically secure this role of world arbiter. e world. i don't know how to choose. what is the best word to choose there sheriff or gendarme policeman yes, they spoke of world authority. you know, there is authority in the area , because flashes do not act according to the described rules, not by the police themselves. but the authority acts smoothly, because they act why the policeman remembered, because when he created e . rozvelt church or began to believe that the permanent members of the security council, it's like the world

the police will keep order. well, the united states wants to become the world's policeman instead. ah, world authority. indeed, this is very correct. i also think that's why, if at the moment when they agree, even silently, even at the level of some texts that e publish, analysts in the united states agree that they are the country of this conflict. and this is the position they will leave. and in order to try to remain in this position, at least in their own eyes. of course, they will carry everything that they are now carrying about the nuclear use of nuclear weapons in ukraine. i completely agree with you. the biden administration still wants to avoid actually becoming a party to the conflict in ukraine, but at the same time, in the american society, the expert community, the military community in the media, simply, but in the most active way, yes on a binge. i would say

discussing the scenario of how the united states can become a country, and this conflict, but here we are recently discussed the scandalous statement. ben hodjas, the former american commander-in-chief of the armed forces in europe, that if russia uses tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, then the united states will inflict a crushing conventional, but crushing blow on the russian black sea fleet, it turns out that this is not alone. your opinion, and the finant show times, er, citing senior biden administration officials, writes that the united states will take conventional military retaliation, that is, not nuclear yes, that's in full accordance with what he said. uh, ben hodges, and here's another opinion of the well-known american neo-conservative, but an expert, but professor jor sound university and member of the atlantic council matthew kroenick. if

russian forces in ukraine launch a nuclear attack, the united states could strike those forces directly. this will make it clear that this is not a major war, but a limited strike. if you are putin what will you do in return. i don't think you'll say right away. let's let's launch all nuclear bombs under the united states. well, that is, we otkryonik believes that why? why does he think so? yes, that's what and what, what, if the united states strikes at russian nuclear installations, but at russian nuclear storage sites, then russia will not strike back. this, by the way, fully fits into the russian nuclear doctrine, which says that if russia registers an intention to strike at russian nuclear weapons, russian nuclear infrastructure will be destroyed. all yes. here then russia will launch a nuclear strike and he is very much

mistaken if he thinks that russia, in this case, will not launch a strategic nuclear strike, but on the united states, but thank god, not all of the united states thinks like a krenik in the republican establishment, a tiger cub of a well-known republican , but on his conservative, but in the republican establishment there is another point of view. for example. uh, what, uh, a very famous american tv presenter, uh, from the fox news channel, uh, tucker carlson, uh, is discussing just the same nuclear risks. this is how we ended up. the closest thing to a nuclear confrontation in history, zelensky called on the united states to hit putin with a nuclear weapon, the nuclear powers should clearly say that if russia even thinks to hit a nuclear weapon on ukraine, there will be an immediate strike on nuclear mines. in russia think about it, if russia even thinks, that is, before russia launches missiles, the us should hit

russia with nuclear weapons in other words. we need to do it now, what the biden administration is pushing for, not they are pushing for the overthrow of the government in russia , they hope that everything will be fine later, that someone better will come in his place and calls for ukraine to strike at russia, which will definitely lead to destruction. new york county height of los angeles death of tens of millions of americans, adequate people don't talk like that corrupt east european authoritarian leader in a t-shirt, teach us about the community of nations and demand from us a nuclear strike, how did we even get into it, but almost no one. it won't stop and ask the question. it's crazy, but they're all for it. well, you could certainly say that tucker carlson is politicized because he's in a political fight with the biden administration and that's why he criticizes, uh, relevant policies. well, as an alternative opinion. listen already. and what does the liberal democratic new york times columnist write? uh, the growth of daudhat about the fact

that in the near future the interests of the united states of ukraine may diverge significantly precisely because of these nuclear fears, the american ukraine's support is good and necessary, but there is a point at which ukrainian goals and american interests may diverge, and the combination of ukrainian military achievements and russian nuclear threats makes that point closer than it used to be to the point where ukrainians want to go all the way. we demand negotiations and restraint. i say, i understand why, kiev is even ready to substitute its territory? nuclear strike for the sake of its territorial integrity while the horror of nuclear war has become a key part of the legacy of reagan politician joe biden. there will also evaluate not only because he did for the warring ukrainians, but also because of what he managed to achieve to ensure peace in the world, and andranik is completely. well, what do you think, and the rational grain in the end. may take over washington, they may realize, like in the days

of ronald reagan, that the main interest of the united states is actually survival. you know, i must say that i was lucky, but i guess not just me i was in california at the ronal reagan library. and here they are with a big proudly show the room and show his first handwritten letter. eh, gorbachev as soon as he became. no, he was not yet gorbachev, he was eight. he wrote the first letter to the year that we were denounced by colossal power and opportunities. the most important thing is to avoid the possibility. whatever the war, history will never forgive us, our peoples will not forgive us, they do not ask. that is, this is the person who said that this empire is evil, that we will throw the soviet

union and communism into a garbage dump, and so further. that is, people then, but i hope today they have not completely disappeared. they understood their global responsibility, i hope that they are raising the stakes and trying to scare us, but in this way they show their own fear. i think that this own fear will become a deterrent. well, i would like to hope that fear will lead to an increase in rationality in american foreign policy. here is tucker carlson , in that comment that we cited, he said that the united states is as close as possible for many decades they came to the threat of nuclear war, the previous time when it was the famous caribbean crisis of 1962, by the way,

this year marks exactly 60 years, and the caribbean crisis and many draw analogies between the current really critical situation in the russian american. yes, already sullivan blinkin tucker carlson everyone is discussing the threat of nuclear war. uh, sergey ryabkov asks, uh, to cool down, uh, and so on, and uh, the other day, a major conference was held at the diplomatic academy of the russian foreign ministry, dedicated to how once an anniversary, and the caribbean crisis also spoke there, including sergei alekseevich ryabkov and listen to what he said. the approaching sixtieth anniversary of the cuban missile crisis, when the ussr and the usa almost reached the point of no return, have a direct projection on what is happening today in the context of a tough confrontation around ukraine, where the collective west has actually unleashed against our country. proxy war, open confrontation between the us and nato, which is fraught with

a direct military clash, is not in our interests in contacts with the americans. reminder oh well forgotten principle that worked during the cold war, but peaceful coexistence, despite all differences and fundamental contradictions. well , the speakers at the same conference also spoke about the need to take into account the experience of the caribbean crisis in the current situation. deputy secretary of the security council of russia a alexander venediktov a nikolai yurievich well, we understand that the main difference between the current situation and the caribbean crisis. this is what the soviet union then threatened to inflict. and a nuclear strike from the territory of cuba directly on the territory of the united states, yes, that is, then it was about a direct conflict between the two nuclear superpowers, while there is an indirect conflict between russia and the united states through, uh,

ukraine well, anyway. yes, despite this, yes, and also, despite the fact that in the united states we do not yet see politicians like john figirald kennedy with his wisdom. but is it possible to hope, and that we will succeed this time too in passing to some kind of peaceful coexistence, about which sergey alekseevich cherevkov speaks bypassing, uh, nuclear war. i believe that we have everything necessary for this. and i'm sure that in russia, in the united states, there are people who are responsible for developing plans for the use of nuclear forces. these are people who are extremely sane and well aware of what they are dealing with and what it is, that very fear, that fear that makes a person wise in folk music, yes, if you remember the american classics. but i would like to say one more thing

. here is a very characteristic quote that you quoted from the new york times that ukraine will risk nuclear escalation for the sake of its territorial integrity. it seems to me that some people there in the united states, or at least in the editorial office of the new york times, are beginning to be forgotten, because this decision is not made by ukraine in the first place. secondly, they are too convinced that in the long term or even in the medium term, their policy of supporting ukraine will bring them what they want, which they have repeatedly claimed victory on the battlefield. i do not expect this to happen and i think that if we look at the potential ratio even taking into account of the western assistance that ukraine receives, this ratio of potentials is not in favor of the west and

ukraine, and it also seems to me that we are completely in vain now so cautiously talking about american and western participation in this conflict. sergei alexandrovich shrebkov, actual participation on the verge of participation, they provide ukraine with intelligence information over the course of these six months, there are obviously instructors there. there are obviously advisers there, what is it like not direct involvement if people who wear american military uniforms and american epaulettes are, uh, in the country that is conducting hostilities providing assistance from the country, this is called direct participation and it seems to me that this is the idea that this direct participation should be conveyed to the american public. well, you are absolutely right. by the way, he talked about it. uh, sergey viktorovich lavrov from the rostrum of the un general assembly and especially during the press conference after his participation in the high-level week. uh, within the framework of the

general assembly, when he said that even from a legal point of view, not to mention political the united states and nato are a party to this conflict, because they violate the requirements of the hague convention on neutrality from 1907 on how neutral countries should behave in relevant conflicts, and no one has canceled this, therefore, yes, they are a party to the conflict, and if they are a party to the conflict, and the nature of this conflict will change in the coming days. i really want to hope that , nevertheless, the rational grain of responsibility at times has the upper hand in the biden administration, and in order to prevent a direct military clash of nuclear or non-nuclear does not matter. we will very quickly be able to move to a policy of diplomatic settlement. not with kyiv, of course. not with kiev yes, but we will be able to start some kind of dialogue with washington. well, it seems to me that

ryabkov's words about the experience of the caribbean crisis. this is a kind of signal of readiness. here we are ready for an appropriate dialogue in order to prevent a catastrophe, well, in any case. the united states is threatening russia with new, as the white house said in a statement, swift and heavy sanctions in response to referendums in donbass in the kherson zaporizhia regions. indeed, here comes the question. do they have the potential to enact such quick and severe sanctions in the conditions of the difficult and economic situation in which the united states itself is in the wall street of black heaven, writes that, given the internal economic problems that, uh, are now in the united states, many republicans in the house of representatives are proposing to reduce or stop military aid altogether. and ukraine and to do internal affairs. the wall street journal also

writes that the united states strategic oil reserve has fallen to a record low since 1984 and warns that this is a threat to the united states given the instability and volatility in world markets, and this decrease is due to the fact that the biden administration used very extensively. these reserves are in order to try to bring down oil prices and, accordingly, inflation in this regard, the question is vladimir dmitrievich what new sanctions we can wait for the detached states and for whom will they be difficult? well, uh, naturally, in such a situation that we are now witnessing, uh, we should expect, of course, sanctions decisions, and they can be of several levels. eh, of course already worked out. uh, sanctions in the financial sector, so i kind of leave now. uh, so let's say outside the

brackets the question of strengthening the sanctions against those territories that, as it were, we all hope will become part of the russian federation and their leaders, so to speak, officials. although many of them are already so. although under sanctions, and we are talking about sanctions directly on the economy of the united russian federation, ah. it can be, of course, the sanctions already mentioned, worked out in the financial sector. that is, this is a further shutdown. e russian banks from swift say oh well, it's true in europe they say. i think that they will talk about this, and the americans may well do this, but the disconnection from swift of gazprombank, which today is a key institution when paying in rubles for deliveries. e of our energy resources. first of all, gas. ah. secondly, uh. this, of course, is an increase in some details related to the restriction on imports and supplies of certain products in russia with a

possible, but a limitation. apparently some other export nomenclature. although, in principle, so to speak. today, we no longer supply the united states of america with oil, oil products, or from others. goods, er, in fact, they simply do not buy something from us, so there are some restrictions. so to speak, they have sanctions on them. no, they still violate the logic of normal trade relations. well, and finally, as it seems to me, the most, uh, serious and most dangerous sanctions in terms of their consequences. these are the so-called indirect sanctions. what, in fact, what, in fact, is the basis of the entire sanctions machine of the united states of america, uh, they become such international, uh, sanctions only because they have a tool to influence other participants in economic relations. and here, uh, the consequences can be really very strong and devastating for everyone. because if today, for example, individual countries of the world have already spoken many times about china, india and other

countries. there are the arab emirates, about others, so to speak, there are arab e monarchs e of the persian gulf an ambulance of saudi arabia which in general becomes certain e centers, including the purchase of russian e energy resources, despite the fact that in general they have their own, as if they exist, but nevertheless, there the bunkering center one of the persian gulf now actually functioned here, but, therefore, in this way in the presence of direct bans on the supply of russian e-e goods, uh, to these to europe or to the united states of america there are channels one way or another to balance global demand and global supply, if secondary sanctions on india and china on others are fully included countries, it actually stops in essence. e any movement.

energy export goods, first of all, goods to the world market, which, despite the fact that the markets that it has developed today in general, uh, expect quite strong losses. here we are talking about the united states of america is one of those for me, for example, one of such interesting indicators, which in general, in many ways, says how they think to themselves, so to speak, representatives of financial circles in the united states of america say, the changing forecasts of the federal reserve system in march, when there were first interest rate hikes one of the first interest rate hikes, as the fed released a forecast that in 24 yr. uh, the twenty-third year, the rate of uh, the federal system will be 2.6%. in june. they changed the forecast. she became 3.8, but in the twenty-third year. now they changed it again in september, it is already four and six. yes, we can imagine. and with what intensity the federal reserve system is

expected to increase inflation to 23 and possibly the twenty- fourth year. this is, uh, it’s quite obvious uh, the vector to the fact that hmm all the levels that are now uh three there 25 u can’t get by, that is, respectively in the bowels well, essentially the federal system, in addition to the fact that it actually performs the functions of the central jar. this is still a large macroeconomic, so to speak, department and a large macroeconomy, that is, in their heads, uh, clearly a strategy for increasing inflation with all the ensuing consequences, therefore, uh. here are indirect ones from my point of view, completing, in the sense indirectly, sanctions and partly financial ones that cut off the same russian energy sector from possible flexible settlements with the rest of the world for energy resources can lead to very serious price surges and destabilization of the entire energy market with the ensuing consequences for the united states of america itself,

vladimir vladimirovich really agrees with you completely. it seems to me that new american sanctions directly against russia will be targeted. but the main emphasis will be just placed on hitting. regarding russia's relations with third countries due to secondary sanctions, and just about one of these countries, it is china that we will talk about after a short advertisement. if they told me that my day is the last prayer repented apologized for subject whom i offended. you can not support people who are suffering and somewhere to be on the sidelines. it was, of course, her choice. the will of her desire. they didn’t see that this is an attractive charming girl who can take off, who can let her down at the start. this is martyrdom. you know, it's martyrdom. after all, in

principle, she did not fight. she did not curse, i turn to them and see the light. we see happiness, we see victory, we see that ideality that she embodied everything, but at the same time tragedy remains and more remains the memory of daria dugin on wednesday at the first and i wanted to say, it's just that it may not be enough and not as often as it should have been, but i had to tell her, dashenka, i love you very much, the vtbeyte team go from retirement at vtb, a pensioner will get 100,000 rubles. and the first 40,000 are guaranteed to receive 1,000 rubles each. go to vtb and everything will work out. maybe

you’ll already do something, why are the nicolights themselves charged for free only in megafon the tariff becomes more profitable every month for free go to megafon gorite fills out a bunch of applications for loans in banks. compare will help fill out just one application for a loan and get approval on the best terms from the largest banks in the comparison. if the loan is comparable. choose the best vtb team wow fast store expanded with the speed of an

express loan from vtb said i want to expand i get approval online in just 5 minutes and up to ten million rubles without guarantors and vtb collateral we help with business. the energy of gigabytes launches the internet and sets in motion everything that loves every three months, the subscriber doubles gigabytes in tariffs, so that all subscribers of the country receive more benefits forever, everyone is given for those who connected and for those who have long been connected with us tele2 and get double gigabytes, forever doubling gigabytes, every 3 months. tele2 other rules. why i invest the best opportunities always in times of crisis, it's time to learn new investments. install the tinkoff investment app. complete a training course and receive a gift package worth up to 20,000 rubles. tinkoff he is one of a kind. did you know that you can get a loan at zero interest online and immediately

think on the card, this is impossible. perhaps. choose a loan on favorable terms. if a loan, then compare choose better. i don't kiss after the first season, first of all , i didn't see anything. and secondly, i have more interesting things to do here. i live with him, his internet is faster. internet for the whole family. choose yours on mts.ru, the vtb team will offer a solution to live without gatherings on fridays and your way to a snowmobile, dear. we live in the city center on the map every day from a reliable bank. order

a free card to receive 1,000 rubles. for everything you are used to and paying utility bills without a commission. order a free vtb card right now, go to vtb, everything will work out. are unpleasantly surprised by the prices for osago osago with a profit of up to 60 percent what where when the autumn series of games on sunday on the first in the big game the big bookmaker of the russian premier league? on the air, the big game in the united states is pursuing an increasingly consultative policy not only in relation to russia but also in relation to

china at the same time. now, if some republicans criticize the issuance of more and more billion-dollar checks for military assistance to ukraine, then no one criticizes the aggressive us policy towards china in the american political establishment, and the same republicans insist on pursuing an even tougher policy, and now in this confrontational policy of the united states on two fronts at once, as well as blackmailing the rest of the world, and the russian foreign minister spoke at the end of last week in the framework of the un general assembly lavrov and the minister of foreign affairs. china wang and listen first to the russian minister. i continue the thoughtless course of nato expansion to the east , the bloc’s military infrastructure approaching russia’s borders, now the united states has set the task of subordinating asian spaces at the june nato summit in

madrid, this, as it calls itself, a defensive alliance proclaimed the indivisibility of security, euro-atlantic and indo-pacific region. under the slogan of indo-pacific strategies , closed formats are being created that undermine the entire the open and inclusive regional architecture that has developed around the osians for decades, in addition to everything, they started playing with fire around taiwan, promising it military support as well. well , in turn, chinese foreign minister wang said from the same rostrum that he is quoting whoever incites a proxy war can easily burn his hands and that the pursuit of absolute security alone undermines strategic stability. yes it is quite obvious that he was talking about china but much more harshly van and e spoke about

us policy towards china, not in his speech at the general assembly, but in the speech he gave on the eve of a in the asia society event in the united states and there he stated that sino-american relations had reached their lowest point since 1979. and that if washington does not change its course, including on taiwan, then a major confrontation between china and the united states is inevitable, given that the chinese usually prefer very streamlined, and statements are very harsh words. but yuri vladimirovich here. i want you ask in the same speech wang and called on the united states to mutual respect for the peaceful coexistence of their mutually beneficial cooperation, which he designated as the three aspirational principles of us-china relations in china believe that these three principles can still be realized. i 'm sure you don't know, uh, i've been to the

location once. e of our russian strategic missile division. i read lectures for officers about china there, and such a slogan hung there. if you want to get to america, go serve in the rocket strategic troops, i was not at the location of chinese strategic missiles, but they, by the way, are not far from the location of our missile silos. so i was in the orenburg province. and the chinese are building their new mines in xinjiang, because this is the best area for missile launches, and so on and so forth. and the chinese. the united states is preparing for war. the last few years have been exceptionally intense. they don't believe in any of these options. although there is,

of course, a proverb. if you want peace, prepare for war yes? well, in my opinion, they don't really believe in the world. look at the same missiles and the chinese are deploying new new missiles. uh, ballistic and uh, they supposedly have hypersonic missiles, this is not confirmed anymore. but, most likely, this is the way the chinese are. for many years they remained in terms of the number of nuclear warheads from russia and from the united states, they are now, uh, rapidly increasing the production of warheads. and the chinese are building the ocean fleet, they already have three aircraft carriers and the fourth one is being built, which will be with a nuclear engine. this is also, as you know, not for. uh, not even for japan, this is not for south korea, this is not for australia, this is a deterrent confrontation. uh, the united states in the field of economy, the chinese understand what kind of

dependent position they are in after 40 years. in fact, a strategic partnership of economic marriage is a marriage of convenience, yes, and they are rapidly curtailing their dependence on the american markets, having proclaimed the concept. two uh, circulations double circulation two circulations one is small, and this is with the outside world. big - it's inside uh, the chinese are taking their billions of dollars out of the american treasury. uh, in order not to repeat our feat with three steel billion dollars that we have frozen. uh, there is a very active counter-psychological struggle going on. yes, the fight against so-called bourgeois liberalism is going on, and the figures

of literature and art are being removed. these are scientific experts who have grown up on grants over these 40 years and people are changing them to teach in american universities. patriotic views and the chinese, you know, they are not blind people. they see american ships with nuclear missiles on board. they walk all the time. right next to the chinese shores, not only in the taiwan strait, they come up to the ports of shandong. uh, allegedly under the pretext of exercises. uh, from south korea, by the way, now there are exercises with the south koreans, and on american ships, by default, american strategic bombers always have nuclear weapons. the chinese see the economic war against them. uh, for example, in the fight against purchases by the chinese. uh,

electronics. the same chips, yes, and the chinese, like us, are tired in this area and depend on american from taiwanese chips, a and eh chinese. so they are not blind. they see, the chinese are not deaf, they hear and the chinese have not lost their sense of smell. they heard the stench that comes from the american media with the center of the psychological struggle. look at the stink about uh the chinese roots of covid-19 when they tried to set the whole world on china what stink was about sindian that supposedly there was slave labor, uh, is used and due to this, this tragically important area is developing, and china, you see, literally. here on saturday there was such. loudly spoiled the air. suddenly appeared. uh, here's a

theory that the sidimpin was arrested by the military. yes, let ’s face it, the military coups have not been arrested, and the armed forces are acting against it, and they don’t like the approach of the 20th congress, at which some decisions will be made. any person who deals with china accepts that this is, well, in the highest degree nonsense because, uh, for xi jinping the army, which stands on patriotic positions, stands firmly, and it will never give offense to its commander-in-chief. whoever tried to offend him. and here pay attention. this is a neglected disinformation, but a fake duck, whatever. it is the first time

the americans are in cash, they are burning bridges. you see, uh, and it's all taken into account by the chinese. and, of course, i don’t know who probably has itchy hands with the same officers, yes, who want to get to america provoke china into some kind of military operation. and i am sure that they will be able to get around these traps, firstly, before october 16, when the congress takes place and after the 16th, when new strategic goals are set, china will move forward, because the future belongs to china and the future does not belong to america. well, if china is actually silently building up its military muscles, then the united states openly says that a war with china is most likely inevitable in this

first. uh, spoke to the grm alison, a former deputy minister defense of the united states author of the famous book the thucydides trap even now, many representatives of the military and military-political establishment of the united states call on the united states to sharply increase the arms race. and now the arms race is open in order to bypass china in the military sphere and get a situation of strategic superiority last week. we discussed at this table a recent article by michelle florna in forren fs magazine. this is the former undersecretary of defense of the united states under the administration. e. barack obama who screams literally that the united states is already losing the arms race. china needs, therefore, urgently and urgently to build up qualitatively and change its military presence. uh, military strategy and so on. here's another piece of evidence from, uh, an already acting executive, the head of the united states air force combat command, marcelli

, said that uh, the air force is the people's liberation army. they almost caught up with the us air force a, and therefore the united states again needs to qualitatively increase the production of combat aircraft. these are the political circles the expert community of the united states is still arguing about how correct the current american policy is, including a whole series of statements by joe biden, and the readiness to use military force directly against china, and in particular. in my opinion, one of the most respected american scientists and experts on china, a. e. michael seng e is the current director of the quincy institute's east asia program. e, believes that by such statements by such policies, the united states does not have a deterrent effect on china a.

rather, on the contrary. here, listen to his opinion. president biden brought us all closer to the shortest possible time to start a conflict with china in his hour-long interview. he repeated his own earlier claims that if china attacked taiwan , the us would go to war with china, he had stated this in a pre-arranged interview earlier in what seemed to be spontaneous offhand remarks. now he has eliminated all the ambiguity of past sayings, there is no longer any doubt that this represents a change in us policy china will by no means be stopped. biden's note. most analysts believe that beijing is allowing washington's military intervention in the event of a hot conflict over taiwan and building up its potential to cope with the situation at the same time seeking to increase its non-military influence on the island, all biden's comments come down to giving more weapons to those forces in china who advocate military deterrence rather than any

assurances or peaceful leverage in other words. biden's clear statement will further aggravate this conflict instead of forcing beijing to behave more restrained yuri vladimirovich agrees with this conclusion of your american colleague. pulled. yes indeed americans. that's pushing the chinese. uh, they drive them, uh, into a corner and uh, conservatives are especially active in her. yes, which are still from the time since the time of obama, bush jr., especially the younger husband. here. uh, look exactly when about the army concept was blown away. yes, the reversal of asia it was then that they began to build a trading trans-ocean partnership. which was aimed at the economic containment of china, trump is already a sanction. it's this color wars. uh, it's

economic uh this, uh, taiwanese support then started uh, on a new level. well, uh, what remains to be done by the chinese, uh, the chinese are left, as dong said. uh, dig deeper tunnels store grain wider and prepare for war. so far, the united states clearly does not want to follow according to professor sven's recommendations, kamal and haris are now visiting. e v. tokyo this is her east asian tour. she is also going to visit south korea, god forbid that she doesn’t fly to taiwan, but by chance it’s completely yes, but not planned. well, today she has already held talks with japanese prime minister ishida and e, the parties said that china's behavior in the taiwan strait is an aggressive and irresponsible provocation, that is, not the visit of nancy palace, not

the supply of weapons, the non-recognition of china as a de facto country contrary to the policy of one china and here chinese actions are an aggressive and, uh, irresponsible provocation. just like how you think. you know me even somehow embarrassed to tell the truth about it. well, how can you take seriously what she says, but ours does not understand, what she is talking about, i already said once. here is her first reaction. she starts to giggle. that is, it means that she is a mentally handicapped person. she just doesn't understand what she's being asked. what question, what is needed, the second she begins to pronounce a set of words, then these set of words. she begins to repeat, thinking that they themselves will acquire some meaning for you, and they don’t acquire meaning over this, they are already tired of laughing at others on fox and therefore, of course, it’s better than the best gift. i

think than the kamala haris trip, it's hard to imagine and i think the chinese are just happy about it, but i wanted two very small remarks. naval forces today are more powerful than american ones, this is their assessment. first the second 2 years ago at farid zakaria. eric schmidt you know who is eric schmidt well one of the founders and the main force of uh, google he said if we don't get smart now and start catching up with china in high technology and especially artificial intelligence. we will forever

lag behind china. i was with farid zakharin for 2 years. and what do you think, this year is quite recent. it was his proposal to allocate 52 billion specifically for these purposes. and just the other day , the americans singled out, that is, the americans are very take the chinese challenge seriously. they understand that it is impossible to deal with this just like that, but in general, probably impossible, but after the sleeves, especially, well, uh, the united states is really preparing for a long confrontation. with china preparing for this, they believe that they can somehow afford and even win at the same time. with china and with russia but now, can they withstand a simultaneous escalation with china and with russia if this passes now, er, starts to happen. here is the big question. we are now let's stop for a few moments and then we

'll talk about europe the rest of the fire pack the rest of the fire pack one at a time, when did the war start? how old was it? now we need to leave a little bit to wait, perhaps the answer to the fire will fly, we stopped to smell the lilacs. yes, we are all fighters of romance. the fire that the guys took just yesterday normally said. you are a man, this is a man's business, be patient. we have the most beautiful woman. we have the most beautiful land worth fighting for it

invincible donbass on saturday at the first perspective is an opportunity to see something new in old, and with a credit card from uralsib it is easy to implement it and not think about interest. issue a credit card for 120 days without interest and get a year of free service, uralsib perspectives where you are. prices for osago are unpleasantly surprised