so there is more. bring another. march for you. good evening on the air big game today the state duma unanimously ratified the treaties on joining the donetsk luhansk people's republics, zaporozhye and kherson regions into russia. tomorrow, these same treaties will be ratified by the federation council, and then the laws of ratification will be signed by president putin and the process of the entry of four new regions into russia the process of forming a new geopolitical

reality in europe will be completed after that a russia will consider the hostilities by the kiev regime of aggression, and its special operation as a liberation and defensive war to restore its territorial integrity , to protect its borders and already its citizens. at the same time, for a long time, russia has consistently called the united states and nato the actual side of this military conflict in ukraine, and against this background, fears have increased in the west about a possible escalation of the conflict. the incantations of the inadmissibility of direct military intensified. a moment between nato and russia but at the same time, the determination to change policy and wage a hybrid war against russia, that is, wage a war, but not recognize oneself as a party to this war, has not yet decreased by an iota. on the one hand, the minister of foreign affairs of germany, analena burbock, stated the following and i quote. we are doing everything so that other countries and nato are not drawn into this war. okay, on the other hand, but the us president padom, secretary of state blinkin and

nato secretary general stoltenberg have stressed over the past 2-3 days that they are not ready to reduce military support to ukraine, which they will everything to prevent ukraine from losing, but at the same time they are not allegedly not a party to this conflict. not later than today, only the representative of the us national security council, john kirby , said that he does not consider the hostilities in the donbass in the kherson and zaporozhye regions an attack on russia, the slogan “i will war to a victorious end” is heard in europe, here is the eu high representative for foreign policy and security policy, josé barrel recently stated that the annexation of four new regions to russia makes the end of the conflict in ukraine, quoting is almost impossible, and not named representatives of the european union, the words of which the newspaper quotes the washington post went even further jose listen no one knows how putin decides to act, no one is the only way out. for

him, it is a complete victory or a complete defeat, and we are working on the latter for the victory, we need ukraine and therefore we are trying to prevent the worst scenarios by helping the kyu, said the anonymous representative of the european union andreevych. here's how you think it fits on one side the desire to prevent a direct military conflict between russia and nato what anna lena beurbock and others are talking about even secretary general stoltenberg on the other hand. these are the statements about the war to a victorious end, and the desire to inflict a total defeat on russia, as this unnamed official said. after all, the same sentiments are also present in the united states. yes, it's true. the thing is , you know proxy wars because i like proxy wars more than hybrid wars. they were before. here we supported the koreans, when they fought against south korea against the americans, we supported the vietnamese, who

they fought against the americans, but we never had the situation in which we now find ourselves , because we have never been in a proxy war, when two superpowers indirectly fought it was not the task that we would defeat the united states. the soviet union never said such a thing. although, of course, it must be said that in 75, when the americans randomly abandoned everything and fled from hanoi and from this saigon. and of course it was a defeat united states globally, and it was the triumph of the soviet union, and it was then, if you remember, that there was the famous report of the tripartite commission, the crisis of democracy, the problem of controllability of western democracies, when he wrote in brazilian language that, uh, it means that western

democracies have 20 to live 25 years. we will all perish in the sea of ​​totalitarian deputies, that is, such defeats. they just don’t go away, when really superpowers are waging a proxy war, it’s another matter that it seems to me that the seventies and even earlier, but there were, well, more adhered to some rules of the game, it was more respect and restraint and understanding. although of course something to say macarthur during the korean war. just demanded the use of nuclear weapons. and if, uh, that means truman hadn’t removed it, it ’s still unknown what he would have done there, therefore, apparently, every time we are faced with new situations, because history never repeats itself. it

's like the previous times were, but one thing is clear. here i would like to finish on this, which is true. the west does not hide that the west wants defeat russia the west does not hide the fact that the west does not want a direct clash with russia, but at the same time the west wants, by hook or by crook , to seep into the process of planning military operations in ukraine in order to weaken russia with the help of ukraine. this is how long the west will be able to do this and at some stage let's say russia. you know we won't let you seep any more, of course. this is such a serious and important question. well, it seems to me that one of the very important differences of the past cold war, especially in its mature stage and the current hybrid war. this is that there were rules then and they were just formed in

the process of the korean war and the cuban crisis and the two berlin crises, and now these rules do not exist and the united states therefore, those red lines that russia marks simply one after another are violated and we we ask questions very often. here's how it is for us. uh, it's quite obvious that the conflict in ukraine is an existential one, it's not interesting for them, but you have to understand that many in the united states are also considering this conflict as an existential one, on which the role and place of the united states in the world order and the world order itself will depend. as such here. a. listen to what she wrote this account in the magazine foren policy, a very famous american e. an international expert, and a former editor-in-chief. e, forina magazine, queen and e. from fellow of the council on foreign relations, gidon rose hmm donbass is now a battleground where the democracies of the west and the autocracies

of the east are fighting for the future of world politics. and other countries are watching from the sidelines, waiting for who will win, if russia support china can achieve its goals, then the narrative is about packing. the west will be confirmed, and the liberal international order will be dealt a crushing blow. but if ukraine, supported by the us and europe, manages to maintain its freedom and territory, this narrative will be revised, this order will receive a new life for alexander islavovich. but this is the wording. it seems to me that it does not leave any just halftones. no, no, no, no, i don't agree. these are the words of everything only for the public of democracy liberalism. it's already being demolished. they are demolished very hard demolished through the destruction of energy. through the destruction of infrastructure through the destruction of the financial. uh, structure through physical destruction through these wars. there are still warriors ahead for the resources of the war for 10

objectivization, because only a few uh, here are a few countries left with sovereign ones yes, they blow it all away. before that, they managed to change people. yes , here is bm and kissing the shoes of african americans and rainbow flags and so on, complete humiliation human dignity. complete destruction. well , just national. uh, here are the traditions, but the values ​​that we observe? yes? remember, uh, here. e bulgakov variety show master margarita woland asked the main question of how the townspeople had changed internally and he then concluded in the thirties that no, they did not apologize. they are the same as before, but now they have changed. now they have changed so much. uh, here is the consciousness of citizens, the economy changes it so much, it simply demolishes its own economy. why, because this model is economic. uh, consurist consumer through endless lending.

it ended up with $33 million in world debt at rising rates, it's impossible to service. now they remember schumpeter's ideas. creative destruction is an oxymoron, because destruction can be creative er, but the idea is that capitalism can't constantly expand. so it expanded after the fall of the soviet union to the entire territory of the planet. he finished everything. now it is necessary to demolish everything completely so that the group of people who are engaged in this demolition, which will save its trillion dollars, however, it will just be considered that it will build a new world order with new rules and a new hegemon of opportunity connected by sacrifice. or maybe not. you know literally two words. i meant to say in defense. uh, joseph show-petter, because my youthful , one might say, not the youthful years of graduate school, i read with such pleasure capitalism, socialism, or

democracy, and shunteters. and i have 560 pages of handwritten notes for this book. the thing is that when the show-peter speaks and many of me very much understand the meaning of creative destruction under why because, apparently they are not very attentive read the book itself and follow the logic of the shooter making noise, what does it say? that marx is wrong when he said that the contradictions to capitalism are not resolvable within the framework of capitalism, they are resolvable. but every time capitalism solves some problem, capitalism changes its nature and over time capitalism turns. why is it said to be creative destruction, because it capitalism turns into socialism, but not through revolutions, but simply through the solution of the problems

that capitalism faces. this must be understood, and this is a brilliant idea that this and she is absolutely impeccable in a different way. now they are not all of them marxists, but not branches. i'm just stating what i said and wrote, which is o. anyway . i agree that we are talking about the global crisis of capitalism, the current model of the world economy. quite obviously himself from the vein. and this creates the prerequisites for a global crisis, including number of the military. and it is precisely the global crisis, including the risks of a military crisis, that russia is talking about when it declares that it is the united states and nato that are considered as a side of the actual side, and the conflict in ukraine in the west, while continuing the hybrid war against russia, tends to talk about something else the risk of escalation, not the aryan escalation to the level of nato russia, but the risks of escalation. ah. through the alleged readiness of russia

to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine. this became one of the main narratives, uh us media statements by politicians in recent weeks. well, after the referendum after the signing of the treaties in the kremlin last friday , again, secretary of state linkin and secretary of defense of the united states austin and president biden spoke about this, and everyone said that yes, so there is a threat, uh, potential but so far they have not see russia's plans and intentions really, rather use nuclear weapons. given that such an application is absolutely inconsistent with russian e, nuclear doctrine and the new york times. and washington fast. yes, they wrote very large articles this weekend, just analyzing the possibility, and the use of russia's nuclear weapons. at the same time , discussions continue in full in the united states about how the united states would respond if russia suddenly went for the use of

tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine and, in principle, in the united states , a consensus has already been formed in the american political and military-political establishment that that if this happens, the united states may strike at the response on russia on the russian armed forces and infrastructure with conventional weapons recently spoke about this, the former commander-in-chief of the us armed forces in europe, ben hodges. it's literally the same thing. a well-known american general, uh, former commander in iraq and afghanistan, former cia director david petrus, said the other day. listen we would respond by leading a collective nato effort that would destroy every conventional russian force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in ukraine as well as in the crimea and every ship in the black sea. well, if you think that hodge spitreus are such

opinions of distraught generals, then i can disappoint you. unfortunately, those who usually call for restraint in the united states, so to speak, ranking national interests according to their degree of importance and existentiality, and those who consider themselves to be members of the school of political realism, argue in approximately the same words. here , listen to the words of the patriarch of american foreign policy, henry kinsor, and what he said during dialogue with the president of the council on foreign relations in the united states, richard hassan listen we do not want to allow a russian victory, we must prevent it in any case, especially if nuclear weapons are used, we cannot allow nuclear weapons to become conventional and i hope that an adequate response is elaborated carefully, because it is not only about immediate consequences, but also

claims to use such force and its legitimization. so that we cannot allow russia after it uses nuclear weapons to achieve, results, against which we have been before and therefore we are striving to prevent the occurrence of such a precedent that to the point of our reaction, then i would respond with commercial weapons or other means with the maximum possible range and tighten the conditions, and i would not propose in russia the best conditions after the end of hostilities. well, here again, how it is combined, on the one hand, they talk about the inadmissibility of direct military action. the disappearance of russia nato on the other hand is seriously discussing an answer, moreover, to an absolutely fictitious hypothetical situation that will not only lead to a war between nato and russia, but when it will be practically impossible to simply prevent the escalation from reaching the global nuclear level. how

do you explain it? you are asking a very correct question, but you are putting dmitry vyacheslavovich in a difficult position. it is necessary to explain that it is impossible to explain logically the american position now is very contradictory. and here it is badly different elements are combined, if you do not take into account one after all, voices are heard there, then oh, you need to negotiate and freeze, uh, the conflict. oh no, it is necessary to fight to the victorious, uh, to the last ukrainian, to fight with uh russia. that sounds like voices. what a look, how cool. we are at war with russia, we are actually a party to the conflict, the voices are no, no, no, we are not directly involved in anything. we are only helping ukraine, a mass of contradictory statements are stitching together all these contradictions, only one thing everyone wants the united

states well, with a few exceptions, everything unbelievable to cause maximum harm to russia here the disputes are only about how to do this through freezing the conflict through escalation of the conflict through the fact that ukraine suffers for a long time or quickly burns out in the flames of the conflict. it doesn't matter how they can't decide. the most important thing is in the means, but there is a lot of contradiction about the means, but it stitches it all together, well, practically uh, the hatred that came out the second element that stitches everything together is that when the americans cheer up a little spirit. and now just like this such a moment immediately begins from them this flattery, as if they are omnipotent. here, yes, we will somehow destroy all russian forces in the

european, european theater in general. theater of military operations, how did the same petrios, when you drew beautiful plans, how he general intellectual will win in iraq than it all ended in shame, then for a while, then petrius. uh, had to achieve something incredible in afghanistan too. the schemes were beautiful. you see, this is some kind of supposedly existing americans in a magic wand. we let's do that, as soon as they are a little spirited. eh, so they shot, then these conversations immediately begin again, as if they have, er, have a magic wand. although the same petrius disgraced himself in two of the most important regional conflicts for america, and therefore unsettled for global borders. actually. it can be said e

of his gilchik unipolarity. the cheek of the american american hegemony to what extent? ah, well, at least he is the hope that was placed on the american army here strategists who developed this whole strategy of american eternal hegemony. it turned out that the american army is not pulling. yes , not a single regional conflict has all these beautiful strategies. therefore, i have two explanations. the first is ah-ah absolutely hatred of russia that is manifested, but at the same time there is great pluralism about how to achieve this, and the second is still. eh, these are the delusions about your omnipotence. i especially agree with the last one. yes, of course, the united states they are trying to artificially shift attention from the real problem of their military participation in this conflict to an imaginary problem, allegedly

russia's readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons, while switching arrows. that greater evil, let 's say, yes, a and e, but at the same time i completely agree that these are the arguments. they show the propensity of the united states to continue to try to determine how the other side will act, here they determine how russia will deal with situations and every time for them a surprise, if russia, uh, does something differently. yes , rather than they, uh, they are trying to assert more than that, for some reason they believe that even if they inflict a direct, uh, direct condensed military strike on russia, that russia will not respond, including not responding with nuclear weapons. this, by the way, here i must remind ptreus and even henry kislindra with all due respect, that a conventional strike on russia and the russian military infrastructure full of missiles is in full accordance with the russian nuclear doctrine. this

is what allows russia to launch a nuclear strike on the secluded states, yes, and it seems to me that the americans should understand this, but because in order to prevent this escalation of any kind, fear is now needed in the united states so far this fear is not. well, if the majority in the american politicians are still trying to turn the arrows to talk about russian tactical nuclear weapons, there was an american politician who seemed to understand. uh, the real risks of escalation and spoke about the threat of a direct military clash between russia and nato through a hypothetical infliction of military conventional military strike on american bases and warehouses in poland, and who? who do you think it is? it's a rubio brand. uh, rusov furious russophobe, but a neo-conservative. uh, a republican in his time, many times the candidates for the presidency of the

united states, listen to him to me. what is worrying is the unpredictability of putin's actions in such a situation it is possible that he could eventually strike at some of the points of distribution of weapons through which supplies pass, including in poland many talk about a nuclear attack, but what i'm most worried about is that russia will attack a nato country, for example, an airport in poland, or some other distribution points, but, apparently, even this risk of escalation is not enough yet, and to achieve a change in the behavior. here is joe biden, the president of the united states recently said that, in principle, there is no need to be afraid of russian strikes and nato will protect every inch. e his, uh, territory. listen, you know putin will not intimidate america and its allies are not emphasized intimidate with his reckless words and threats. he can't scare us, and he doesn't scare us with his reckless threats. he cannot

take over his own territory. a neighbor and get away with america together with our nato allies, we are ready to defend every inch of nato territory every inch. so mr putin don't get me wrong, every inch is very short. we are heading towards a second caribbean crisis. here, judging by what biden says. you know no, i don't think so, because rather, we are in it. we are in crisis. it's just that there are different ways out of each koreizis, but those who are interested in the caribbean crisis can read robert kennedy's 13 days where he sets out in detail. how they discussed issues for 13 days and how they came to a decision today. no, there was no kennedy or john f. kennedy, so it’s hard to say what the white house thinks, but i want to, firstly, say that eats, finally, i

feel and hear in an absolutely obvious way washington’s clear line regarding the conflict with russia, they are now unambiguously declaring and what petraus says what others say, if russia moves to strike with tactical nuclear weapons, then it is for them, as if violation of the fifth article attacking nato countries on strange and so on, then they will directly engage in hostilities with russia and will strike in the russian aviation fleet bases and so on. this is clear for me. that is, the situation has cleared up , there is no more fog. that's when america stokes,

how to enter and so on. let's pause for a moment, and then we'll talk about europe. space maps are filled with tablets and the navigator checks the route for the last time, let's go guys for 14 minutes. i believe friends caravans of rockets rushed now it was not easy.

then sometime over the years we will remember them to the doctor. come on, pray for this. well landed something absolutely incomparable to the earth from the side of the anniversary of the flight of the first crew into space. on friday at the first theater begins with the hanger of the viewer, when coughing does not matter. what kind of dry or wet rengalin does it help to cope with any cough with acute respiratory viral infections rengalin

for adults and children from 3 years old and dry and wet cough with rengalin is not terrible. even more benefits with the new banking ozone card, millions of goods at discounted prices every day. open additional discounts. open an ozone card in the ozon app for a technocommun 19 pro smartphone with a discount of up to 25%. premiere in kions online cinema. swear that you will be faithful and you will not give life to one another there is no pastor union of salvation time of wrath. watch in the online cinema the un will offer a solution. order free get

1.000 rub. for everything you are used to and payment. show for free now go to vtb and everything will work out. we deliver with love 25% discount on homecat plant clumping filler and 50 % discount on ola socks set . after all, from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus. and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, so kagocel is the highest antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them in a pharmacy, the post office, the bank guarantees an income of 10% in each

grocery store with a card everywhere, i explain the income intelligibly, pay everywhere and here everywhere here, yes, and you get income. issue an all-terrain vehicle card for free and get a 10% cashback in any grocery postal bank, care in pyaterochka discounts for you 2790, so that the teams become a reality issue a credit card for 120 days without interest from uralsib and get a year of free service, uralsib perspectives, where you, who can no longer be dedicated today, miss me, because russian lotto is a time-tested honesty for me and for you and for everyone a cash loan at a rate of 8.9

each. this discovery insomnia often wake up. you can fall asleep in 20 minutes and sleep soundly through the night, bad sleep is no longer scary. did you know that you can get a loan at zero percent online and immediately on the card. think it's impossible, maybe choose a loan on favorable conditions for comparison. if a loan, then compare choose the best. there's a big game on the air one of the success stories of american foreign policy is what i would call the colonization of europe, the colonization of europe by the european union. and in particular. in germany, here we are talking not only about nord stream, but about the influence the united states has and demonstrates on the behavior of brussels, and the biden administration

announced that from now on it intends to allocate $ 1.5 billion every month to economic assistance to ukraine and, according to bloomberg , demanded that the european union also increase its economic financial support to ukraine what do you think already at the next eu summit, which will be held this week on october 6-7 in the czech accordance with which he will be able to allocate monthly to ukraine. throughout the conflict, until it stops, and ivan alekseevich well, you know, this immediately caused me the association of the party said it is necessary the komsomol answered yes, this is such a model of transatlantic relations. well, what do you think, as more nationally oriented political

leaders come to power in europe, like george melonia, for example, in italy , something like that. and the neo-komsomol model of trans-atlantic relations can change. and i think that may change, but since you have accepted this analogy. i, uh, would say that uh, this is how the komsomolets of the soviet union have changed from enthusiasts who salute and honest they go to fulfill everything, and on such careerist komsomol members who are in no hurry to do anything and when necessary, everyone disappears somewhere. that's probably about how they behave for the time being. and those who benefit from the current protest moods, that is, to throw an open challenge to the united states, as dozens of other states in the world do. these european politicians, most likely, will not be able to understand that they are still there.

uh, in power in countries where there are a lot of hidden mechanisms of influence hidden mechanisms of influence and therefore, it’s completely open to act against the americans, but i think that few will decide, but not speak openly to sabotage and disappear. as you remember, the principle of ben salman is simply not picking up the phone when biden calls him. and you know, you don’t pick up the phone, and then say, well, skip the call, by chance, we’ll call you back next time. that is, you know, i would say that they will, if almost the whole world is ready to challenge the americans. and yes, i must admit that, let's say, not quite eh or something, but how ready to quit visa. so, when the russian icebreaker went to break, uh, the ice of american hegemony, a lot of people are ready to go, uh, follow him. maybe with caution, but,

but let's go, and european politicians, er, who will now come to power on pro-tight sentiments, including italian ones where already. here are the choices. i think that they will dodge american diktat not openly resist it, not openly declare it, but dodge it. and this is in general, probably, if you already compared it with e, colonialism and anti-colonialism, then perhaps these are different stages of the anti-colonial struggle. it is not the western world that is ready for more advanced stages of the anti-colonial struggle, as mahatma gandhi was open in the world, as he fought with colonialism, as you know. here, apparently, the europeans are ready for such more passive ones. uh, forms, not even struggle, but dodging american hegemony and such. uh, sabotage with

elements of pretense. so i think that what we can expect is real, but there will certainly be bright ones. politicians like the orn. which will be ready for more, by the way, orban does not directly challenge the united states. i think that also george meloni is the new italian government and orbán. they will fight to a much greater extent precisely with european institutions with the institutions of the european union than in the united states, but there will also be a certain current in this. , the entry of four new regions sanctions are part of russia and the american sanctions package has already been announced, and they have imposed sanctions against the federation councils in their entirety. yes, which completely excludes the possibility of a dialogue between the federation council and the senate. yes, and put an end to even potentially reviving and inter-parliamentary dialogue between russia and

the united states, a lot of personal sanctions include there against elvira nabiullina, and a large number of organizations of individuals and legal entities, but also the emphasis of american sanctions policy will be aimed at third countries, these are secondary sanctions, uh, which will be aimed at those countries that seek to maintain interaction with russia and just the other day , the corresponding letter was published, the corresponding document is the united states department of the treasury, where it actually says that the united states will quote more aggressively, yes more aggressively, but to apply sanctions against third countries for supporting russia, and immediately the united states imposed sanctions against companies from china from belarus and armenia for supporting russia alexander ivanovich also has a limit to secondary sanctions. the united states, on the other hand, strategically worsen relations with these countries

strategically, and do not stimulate these countries to move more and more away from the dollar. that's when the quantity grows into quality, when these secondary sanctions. and they will work for the us and they will start working against the us is the main reason why sanctions work. it is that the american consumer market is a lacquer piece for everyone for china for germany for japan and when some the company is being kicked out. it is, of course, a crash. this is a loss. uh, billions of rubles. it's dollars of profit, yes, or euros look how volkswagen paid right away, here's the volkswagen story in america with er, exhausts cost a total of 60 billion euros. uh, how easily bmw paid a nine billion fine just to stay like that, yeah. here, as soon as the american market starts to collapse. here, as soon as the crisis that they launched begins to destroy the american one. uh,

the consumer model and the global consumer model then these guys will say thank you. we'd better buy here. russia has oil and will survive the winter and gas. and then we will return to you in your consumer area. well, uh, if the united states has already introduced uh, the new package of anti-russian sanctions of this european union is again a delay and this delay is related to energy issues. the european commission has recently reminded me of sisyphus. yes, that one, which pushes everything, pushes the same stone, does not understand what to push it out, probably, or raise it to top of the mountain, but impossible. i mean, energy restrictions are new energy restrictions . and in particular, the idea of ​​a price ceiling for e, russian oil, the european commission once again wrote in its sanctions proposals. uh, this

idea of ​​a price cap, including those, uh those prohibitions that will be imposed on the provision of services. and to those tankers, yes, to those sde. servicing transactions where the price will be higher than the ceiling set by the european union together with the united states and not only hungary was against here, as the edition of the politician writes against e, greece, cyprus and malta, also spoke out, who believe that with such decisions the european union is simply shooting itself in the foot, because other countries will provide tankers, other countries will provide services anyway russia will export, and its oil, but the european commission stubbornly, still promotes this idea. as you explain it, then the second model is tantalum flour. yes, when he wants to grab it. e, bunch, e grapes. she is rises wants to drink water, and the water disappears. and now he is tormented by hunger and thirst, because he is

punished by the gods. yes and now, they are now in the same situation, that if god is in washington for them, then they will be punished. torments, when they can do nothing , yes, and uh, here you have to look at them from the point of view of medieval skalastika. remember in thomas aquinas, uh, should the guardian angel grieve over the fate of his ward no, for everything is god's will, and if they replaced god with washington, then this is more and more washington, uh, it's time for the guardian angel and the european to forget to fold their wings and fly away. here is a topic that combines energy and geopolitics, and is also a vivid illustration of the colonial policy that the united states is pursuing in relation to the european union. and in germany in particular, these are the explosions of the northern streams. ah, who benefits from it quite obviously, but russia, by the way, yes, uh, uh, uh, convened. uh,

the un security council meeting on northern flows, because this is an attack on a critical infrastructure is terrorist acts an act of hybrid warfare, among other things, and who benefits from this act it was quite obvious that vasily nebente, russia's permanent representative to the un, spoke about this just at this meeting. listen, the main question. is it profitable what happened with the northern stream in the united states, of course, american liquefied gas suppliers should celebrate, multiple increases in lng supplies to the european continent a, from a political point of view, the last thread that ensures independence is broken european union in the field of energy. the united states in the conditions of the energy crisis hastily transferred european production. they get cutting edge . technologies and production resources are all that the united europe has been accumulating and developing for decades. the inhabitants of europe are left alone with

their problems, but no one cares across the ocean that europe is expecting a very dark, cold and long winter. now listen to what about this same act of hybrid war and international terrorism, said the president of the united states joe byte. a lot of people ask me about the pipeline and i'll tell you what, it was a sabotage and now the russians are spreading disinformation. we are working with our allies to find out exactly what happened and at my direction have already begun to help our allies to strengthen the protection of this critical infrastructure at the right time, when everything calms down, we will send divers to find out exactly what happened we are not sure yet we know, but do not listen to what putin says, we know that this is not true. i think it's brilliant. we don't know what happened yet, but don't listen to putin because everything putin says is not true. the president of the united states says

in general, how can one build relations with such a counterparty? the fact is that every day, when listening to the trick, each of the journalists speaks , they cite some biden statement and say, he is lying. here and here lies. here, too, he lies, that is, he lies all the time, if, of course, he understands what he is saying, and more often he lies and does not realize that he is lying. i wanted to say one very important thing. it seems to me, i thought that this was not covered at all in our programs, but they told me in some form, not only he turned himself in when he said that we would disable the nord stream, that is, in fact, a person is not from the street, plumber. vasya is still the president of the country, who publicly said. this is him in january, when

they said, and how did he say? i assure you, we have the ability to do this. that is, well, the nose was stupid, of course. well, well, frankly, as he said, he went against the principle, the second iran toleran always said never. don't give in to the first impulse. she is always sincerely like this, that means about other evidence. i want to refer to the report. rent, corp. i don’t know if you discussed it or didn’t, because this report shocked me not only because it was cut, i talked about germany in your program that america is destroying the german economy. it is undermining the foundation that germany will rise up, like the italians, as an alternative. there for germany, like others, and it will end very badly for the usa. and suddenly i

i read what i say analytically. it 's written. in this report on january 25, the market corporation writes confidentially written, yes headed, if you are six pages of self-tapping screw, the grand total. that today germany is developing very successfully, if germany is not stopped, germany will leave the tutelage of the united states and become an independent act of world politics, which cannot be allowed america is weakening. and if some serious steps were not taken, america would experience an economic weakening collapse, there and so on. etc. and what is offered and offered. the war in ukraine between germany and russia, first of all, its own illitz, these useful idiots

for this are german greens, who understand nothing of their ideological rage. they will fight in the forefront, they wanted to spit on german interests against russia. as salt and others said not so long ago. although that now a little thinks. yeah, and in the end they really go in the forefront and say, damn the german economy german voters german working class, there and so on, the well-being of germany, we will be for ukraine , we will be in the forefront. it turns out that in fact this is a pre-planned us strategic line to destroy the german german economy, the well-being of german

industry and, in fact, where to go next and, of course, the destruction of the nord stream one and two oil pipeline is built in. ingeniously , the behavior is in this line, the faster deprive germany and make germany absolutely dependent on the united states. plus, pants charge them for gas, there and others and so on, so much the better for america from here. it's already said volkswagen and more money is all moving to america and poor, germany is the only country. which has retained its industry and expensive quality, because all the rest lay down under china and they really destroy this one for me e not what it seems, but i see,

just with the naked eye, that we are witnessing an attempt to simply tectonic shifts within the european union to reformat fundamentally the balance of power in the european union, traditionally more recently the european union. well, after the franco-german tandem had already ceased to exist, so to speak, due to the weakness of france, germany's leadership remained in recent years. and now, pay attention to the undermining of the northern streams in an amazing way coincided with the next collision. just another word. i can not pick up more against berlin right now with bigniv in the rao, the polish foreign ministers are signing a directive, and reparations from the side. uh germany in the amount of 6.2 trillion zł - this is about 1.3 trillion dollars, that is, at the same time, germany is deprived of the economic basis of its subjectivity at the same time. poland, the baltic countries

, ukraine are shouting that germany is losing its moral and ethical, so to speak, strength, because it does not help ukraine in the way that others help, as it should have done with its energy policy towards russia. germany has discredited itself in general. and here is another reparation, ivan alekseevich, that is, indeed. we are witnessing such an attempt to make an internal revolution inside the european union and instead of germany, to make such a conglomerate completely about the american countries, starting with poland, the new europe , you are right, when you emphasize the scale of what is happening. indeed, these are tectonic shifts, but the word revolutionism also suggests that this is , well, as if it exploded now, i would still like to offer you such a line to see what is happening is that the united states has long ago staked on the so-called new allies. it's well

obvious to international experts. uh, the fact it started was said during and this is the old group is new, and it started back in the late nineties, but it completely splashed out during the start of the war in iraq when the old allies did not support, and the new ones ran like you said before, komsomol members and enthusiasts and uh, the united states obviously wanted these new allies to rule europe politically but, and i'll say a little rudely to get the point across, but they are by and large poor people, but really for they are worth, cunning britain yes, zaymi is worth this here, uh, not always reasonable but still partly strong america but they themselves are starving and therefore, as soon as some kind of economic crisis of the world some problems. they immediately all stand in line

for money. to whom germany germany first of all, well, the duality was undressed, that, on the one hand, the united states seems to pump up geopolitically, and then, as soon as there are some problems, they immediately run away from the geopolitical american front. e in german social security yes, for all sorts of handouts. and this is mature mature mature this situation. the americans ultimately decided that something had to be changed. here in this one, in this foundation, it is no longer possible for this to happen, and in fact what is happening now is this. eh, how did you say? lenin who was nothing? no, to everyone. yes, this is a change in those, a change in the model, primarily an energy model, but i think that this will be followed by a change in some kind of financial model to one so that germany is not

at the head of the european food chain, but that there were these so-called new allies, and above all, poland is making poland. now not just a geopolitical leader. uh, what she was trying to be all the time, but they are actually trying to bring economic bases under this. this is the robbery of germany and the restructuring of the european and energy and i think, after this, the financial market in such a way that there are more and some others at the head of these food chains. . uh, other countries, so yes, it's a fundamental shift. why does germany allow itself to do this? this is a separate issue. despite the fact that there almost everything is correct. they know, but without will. pay attention to how cynically and quickly the policy of the biden administration is changing, she criticized trump for quarreling with germany with merkel at the initial stage, the biden administration, it seems, how she

curtsied towards berlin, tried to restore tariffs, did not remove. yes, but now the biden administration is openly, not even quietly. yes, there is no rhetoric, but the actions are much tougher against germany than the trump administration took and primarily concerns energy. so in europe, of course, the energy crisis is getting worse, and over the past few weeks we have been hearing from brussels and other european capitals the same idea that if the winter is warm, they will hold out without russian gas, because there in germany there is more than 90% pumped into gas storages in the eu as a whole. well, about 80 with a little 85. well , today and the european center for medium- range weather forecasts predicted that this winter will be much colder. unlucky, it will be a cold winter. uh, so, therefore, it is not clear how they will manage without russian gas further, and this very week,

custody plus uh, it is assumed that they will agree on a reduction in oil production by more than 1 million barrels per day. the price of oil will rise and on the same weekend, gazprom announced that because of austria, russian gas supplies to italy were completely stopped, and aleksandrovich then it will only get worse in general, as you estimate. yes? they have a very hard winter, and moreover, when we talk about energy, we must understand that the level of development civilization level of development savings the comfort of people's lives depends entirely on energy and energy consumption over the past 100 years. it. rational square of the population is the population and if they lose 40% and energy, then they must decide, u two hundred million people, because of the 500 million oe, europeans, only 300 can survive with the

amount of energy that will be available to them 200 million there it is superfluous either to send them to conquer, jerusalem is warm there, or the new world is opened again to brazil somewhere where it is warm. well, or now, they are already turning into africa , you know, by the level of consumption by the standard of living, they are turning into africa, and this is anderson's terrible fairy tale the match girl. yes, remember, when a girl froze near the shop window for christmas from the eyes of a match to keep warm, well, in the end, it froze us is a terrible fairy tale. this is europe , this is winter, by the way, europeans are not really expected in africa. apparently on an example, but a change in attitudes towards france with one. russia europe is that part of the world that is losing its positions in africa with uh, china and russia and even the countries of the middle east acquire them, we will now interrupt, and

after a short advertisement we will talk about a pleasant abrasive. this wild feeling is the top of lonely people, of course, mikhailovich, he saw what we see, but in a completely different way, and therefore it expresses a lot to leave for moscow without work without housing. that's where, for example, zhvanetsky lived, he filmed near the airport. he rented a one-room apartment, my friend zvonitsky on saturday on pervoi wait large by five small portraits normal no, and these are small, but today

i don’t kiss after the first season, firstly, i didn’t see anything. and secondly, i have more interesting things to do here. you live, yes, i live with him, his internet is faster. special offers and save up to 40 percent on fast internet for the whole family. choose yours on mts.ru. even more benefits with the new banking ozone card, millions of goods at discounted prices every day.

open additional discounts. open the basic map in the ozon application, a set of a glass of bohemia for 285 rubles. i'm a photographer. if the pictures skin problems are easy for me to fix in life their disguise is not an option akriderm of complex action helps fight inflammation, redness , infections and itching on the skin and gives more confidence in life, while at the same time healthy skin beauty 154-99 10% discount on birthday with the application magnet vtb team will offer order a free card from st. petersburg turned out to be 1,000 rubles. for everything you are used to and payment. commission order a free vtb card right now come to vtb everything will work out in any incomprehensible situation. write it’s easier for the robot max to issue a european protocol online

than it seems, public services national project digital economy, 10 months of halva, still weighs nothing to you. still zero interest on installments and fees. for service, too, no, hulk is a weightless installment plan, a weighty advantage. with cystitis phytolysin, scientific studies have shown that the drug in the form of a suspension is absorbed better than conventional tablets. phytolysin response to cystitis. come here. let them know if you get approved for a loan. a comparison will help you know for sure. check your credit raid, apply and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms on compare if loan then compare choose the best show begins new paper towels