i won’t trample the wind, no one believed. russian and everything is in place. it can't be russian can't change their passive. broke forward, you're a monster haina, you need to detain the russian devil. i'm in the suite, this idiot is coming. and i'm there, why doesn't karl like cowards? by the way, i also go ahead.

did not make it.

whore in general. 8 steps transfiguring we need to return russia to the borders of old russia , and you, the prince, have a significant role to play in this. we

do not forget the people who help us. so go ahead. apply. go all out.

good evening on the air is a big game today very an important day both for the military conflict in ukraine and for the hybrid war of the west against russia as a whole in response to the saturday terrorist attack organized by the kiev regime on the crimean bridge, russia launched a massive missile attack on the objects of the military communications department of the energy of ukraine in many ukrainian cities, including kiev and about that saturday's sabotage on the crimean bridge is a terrorist act of the kiev regime, which could not be left unanswered. today he said this at a meeting with permanent members of the russian security council president vladimir putin listen to what he said. the explosion arranged on october 8 is a terrorist attack aimed at destroying the civilian critical infrastructure of russia, it is also obvious that the customers, the organizers, the perpetrators of the terrorist attack are the ukrainian special services. it

is simply impossible to leave crimes of this kind unanswered. this morning, at the suggestion of the ministry of defense and according to the plan of the russian general staff, a massive strike was carried out with long -range precision weapons of air, sea and ground basing on energy facilities of the military command and communications of ukraine in the event of continued attempts to carry out terrorist attacks on our territory , responses from russia will be tough and in scale will correspond to the level of threats created by the russian federations. this is how russia has unequivocally confirmed those red lines, which it has said more than once, that strikes on important russian infrastructure, including the crimean bridge, strikes on crimea itself and deep into russian territory are unacceptable and the response if these red lines are violated

lines. it will be the toughest, and in my opinion. this is a signal not only to kiev but also to washington, where they undoubtedly watched this very carefully. what will be the russian response to the ukrainian terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, and i think that if this response were soft and vague, then the united states might consider such strikes to be quite acceptable and the likelihood of providing kiev with long-range missiles would certainly increase. this is how washington read this signal from russia. what could be their reaction and how it will be develop their policy towards the ukrainian conflict about it. today we will talk with the president of the center for national interests dmitry simes, who is in washington dmitry good evening. good evening, today the white house has already issued a statement in which president bynon condemned the russian missile strikes and said that they only strengthen the american resolve to support ukraine for as long as it takes

. listen to a quote from this white house statement. united states and strongly condemns the missile the blows inflicted today on russia in ukraine, including in kiev, these attacks. they only further strengthen our resolve and support the people of ukraine for as long as necessary, we again call on russia to immediately stop aggression and withdraw troops from ukraine well, a similar statement was made today by the secretary general. nato ian stoneberg too, that nato will support ukraine for as long as it takes dmitry, based on these statements? do you think washington read the russian signal and if i read exactly how, what conclusions were made in washington and here, as i understood, uh, joe biden's statement, the united states does not intend to change its policy in the near future not in the direction of escalation, which is good not in the direction of deiscalation, which is bad ? and dmitry, what

president biden said, it was absolutely predictable. if you want enough standard wording. uh, as far as i remember, there is no text speech in front of me. as far as i remember, he didn’t even just say, uh, about russian aggression, but he said about unprovoked russian aggression. it makes washington feel compelled to mention, lest anyone think, uh, that russia might have some reason to do it in ukraine or, uh, the united states, but uh, i don't know. uh, how seriously do you have to take this. if president biden had said something different, then, of course, there would have been a political storm in washington and would have followed immediately. e accusations that he is surrendering ukraine and ukrainian

logisticians, of whom there are a huge number in washington both in the press and naturally in lobbying structures and people who actually act as ukrainian lobbyists in congress. they would all say that on the eve of the midterm elections, and biden, in his coming age, lost his ability. uh, to provide uh russia, uh, tough resistance. so how would he say it and say, and how significant it is, of course. i 'm sure moscow will be judged not by words of this kind, but by american actions on specific decisions to provide ukraine with a new energy long-range ultra-precise weapons, and ukraine also asks for fighter jets. now he’s already talking, he ’s talking about tanks in border builders. here is how much washington will help ukraine in this regard. you will

be a criterion for evaluating the american position, but i want to tell you right away that i have already had several telephone conversations with people in washington who are closely following these events. and they noted that, in general, it does not look like russia has dealt such a massive non-discriminatory strike against ukrainian targets, as one told me. an official, but he says, look, if they delivered so many blows, and the ukrainians say that they lost 11 people killed, of course, when you are one of these people, it’s a pity, but it looks like a massive strike on civilian targets. it's more, it seems that russia really struck the infrastructure at some command posts, but

of course, there could be some targets here, uh, military casualties may even be civilians, this happens in a war. i say this to the fact that so far in washington so far among serious people, no feeling that russia has done something that goes beyond, uh, what is allowed in a war, well, in a war, as in a war, and for me personally, it is obvious that, uh, president zelensky and his entourage are doing everything possible to directly push russia the united states, and what that might lead to , uh, is easy to imagine, and i have to say that there are people in washington, but sensible people. which, in general, begin to think seriously. what could such an escalation lead to? let's

hear what he just said about this on american television, former chairman of the tobov chiefs committee, admiral michaelom. now about ukraine. you heard president biden's comments, you heard what john kirby said. how do you now assess the nuclear threat from russia, i think we should take putin seriously. what demands will be placed on us in order to respond, this also speaks of the need to sit down at the negotiating table. true, i'm a little worried about the rhetoric that we chose president biden president biden, reached in his rhetoric to the brim. i think we need to take a step back and do everything we can to try to negotiate a settlement on this issue. i have known admiral malon well for many years. he was a member of the board of

directors. e center, which i head the center for national interest and took an active part in our work. he stepped down from the board of directors relatively. recently came out very decently without showdowns without claims, but uh, it was obvious that he had, uh, disagreements, in that including, uh, and with me on one very fundamental issue. as far as it is necessary to talk about the threat of nuclear escalation of the admirals, it seemed that this is an extremely delicate topic, because when you start raising it, you willfully or unwittingly disturb american public opinion, and willingly or unwittingly you lead to a situation. yes , it is becoming more difficult for the united states to pursue, but if you like, a vigorous

foreign policy, as is sometimes expressed in washington to the muscular one. and that it turns out to be some kind of limitation, on the path of pursuing a foreign policy line that would meet american interests. it was not only the admiral's point of view that it was shared by many current and former american military leaders, and in this context, what the admiral said. as he said it, from my point of view, speaks for himself with the utmost clarity, so that the american establishment, including among the high generals and admirals, there is a growing understanding that the conflict over ukraine has a very dangerous potential. and what is needed is a strong-willed decision from the side the leadership of both countries in order to find

some kind of negotiated solution is not today, the official position of the biden administration, but i know who is inside the administration. there are people in high positions who agree with this way of framing the issue . dmitry, i fully agree with you. the statement of admiral malen, who headed the joint chiefs of staff under the barack obama administration, is extremely important, because he announced the need for a russian-western russian american deal, and by settlement of this conflict. this is fundamentally important, but because it is impossible in the current conditions to talk about the resumption of russian ukrainian negotiations, but, but due to the absence. ukraine's subjectivity, the only agreement that can matter is the russian-american, uh, agreement on the de

-escalation to prevent a direct military clash and, uh, on the settlement of this conflict, and recently. in fact, in the west there are more and more voices in favor of turkey speaks of exactly such a development of events. and president erdogan even declares that he would like to seat representatives of the united states, france, great britain, germany and russia at the table, and within the framework of a similar a, uh, within a similar format, try to find e. the solution to the current conflict, which concerns not only ukraine but also broader fundamental issues. e european. security, of course, now it is probably premature to talk about possible. the contours of a similar agreement, but what about it became to say, this is very important, because really, but the situation is not getting easier and not

getting better, because really everyone sees in russia, by the way, and in the united states that the escalation is growing and that the threat of a direct military clash between russia and nato is also growing and in this regard, it is really necessary to stop and try to find, uh, the politics of a diplomatic solution, before it is too late, and in this environment, i fully welcome u words, u general raspberry, in addition, dimitri also uh, thank you for your attention. and that your interlocutors in washington drew attention to the selectivity, and the selectivity of russian missile strikes on ukraine is very easy to explain , because the purpose of russian strikes was not to cause any serious damage to ukraine, especially humanitarian. military yes, military-political yes, but the main goal was precisely to send a signal, to clearly show that ukraine had done something

completely unacceptable and for this immediately, uh, retaliatory measures followed. and what if ukraine and will continue to take such steps, then the nature of russian strikes and the scale of destruction will be much greater. that is, it is an unequivocal signal. and as i said at the very beginning. i think that this is a signal not only to kiev, but also to washington, and in washington in recent days some dissatisfaction has been expressed, but publicly, and the behavior of ukraine in organizing terrorist attacks on russian territory, for example, the murder of daria dukina, and here some media write that terrorist attacks , and with regard to the crimean bridge, they also call united states a. i wrote a serious concern about this. in particular, the italian republic, which is in the pentagon, is really very seriously concerned that the ukrainian regime is

resorting to the practice of terror and does not report it, moreover, they do not report it to terror against critical objects, and even american curators are aware of it. well, it is noteworthy that the united states did not praise ukraine for this terrorist attack against the crimean bridge, but at the same time did not condemn it. that is, it says probably about the united states trying to test the russian red lines. and how seriously russia is really ready to defend these red lines. right now dmitry will receive an answer in this regard. what do you think from now on. and after these missile strikes today on e, kiev and other e, cities, e and the object of ukraine, the united states will more tightly control the actions of the kiev regime and prevent such attacks.

but uh dmitri how do you guess? uh, no one told me how the united states, uh, would be to respond to further russian strikes, such questions are hypothetical, well, they don’t like to discuss, especially when they understand that i can use it, and in our programs on channel one , so i’ll have to answer you e not with clear information, and if want with informed intuition of my informed intuition, and i think that for now, uh, that's in response to what happened, a tonight, and i don't think that in response to this, the united states will change its course significantly, especially the day before , the forthcoming is soon less than a month from the midterm elections, when the administration

does not want a biden at all. yes, to accuse them of not being able to resist toughly. e to russia and putin but the fact that they are starting to think, including in the administration, where is it all going in this. i don't doubt it either. you know, they are in kiev well, how to say, very cool guys and without brakes even reproduces the impression. you can read this with courage. it looks more like irresponsible impudence to me, but it’s clear that they are talking. uh, well, you know, from the position of people who can take the toughest stance, but proceed from the fact that they will be armed in this case. who will pay for them is the most important thing. for some reason, they proceed from the fact that for them the united states will take a real risk

of a strategic nuclear clash with russia , so i don’t know where this kind of mr. zelensky comes from. e confidence, it seems to me, is not built on facts. president biden and his closest advisers have repeatedly said they are entirely on the side ukraine but the radio of ukraine go to the third world war. they are not well prepared. it is known that when the united states helped ukraine plan military operations, they used the war game method of calculating various scenarios, and this is at least such a miscalculation in washington. one of these calculations that i heard about was that ukraine has some kind of relatively short window of opportunity before the onset of cold weather.

and until the russian partial mobilization brings its results after that, and washington they assume that russia will have new opportunities and that there will be a new round of escalation, in which ukraine will demand a further american response, because ukraine, of course, will not be able to cope with this on its own. this, i think, will not even be denied by president zelensky himself, who constantly demands that he take responsibility for his decision in a collective smell. well, how will he answer that? russia well, washington say that russia in the first place? there may be the possibility of some further steps with the use of conventional weapons, but does not rule out the use of tactical nuclear weapons in moscow, they say that this

kind of planning does not take place, at least there is no such intention, but the americans are not completely. uh, it comes from this, because, as you know, for decades, nato has relied in europe on its tactical nuclear weapons. this was part of nato doctrine at a time when the soviet union had superiority in conventional weapons and asks, but if russia were pushed into a corner, how would she respond, and to this no one has an answer. well, in general, responsible people in this area, namely, do not really want to experiment. i'll try to simplify it a bit and uh, dramatic that uh ukraine reminds me of this, if you like, teenager bully who, uh, stands by the metro

, approaches passers-by and starts bullying. and if they come into conflict with him. and suddenly , from behind the bushes, three serious foreheads of a bully are shown. this, of course, is the scenario that mr. zelensky can suit. but it’s interesting that it would turn out, if it turned out, not a random passerby, but a world champion in sambo, and it would turn out that he could not only slap this teenager properly, but also deal with these hooligans. or maybe if they figure out who they're dealing with, maybe they won't want to come out of the bushes for that teenagers. maybe they will allow him to somehow deal with the situation himself, as in his time, the united states in 2008, but they allowed mr. saakashvili. so it seems to me that in kiev they have a slightly

different mentality than the mentality of those who makes a decision in washington well, of course, here is the ukrainian lack of brakes, and it is very dangerous. and the situation is very destabilizing dmitry it seems to me that today's russian missile strikes against ukraine, uh, have clearly demonstrated and proved artificially meaningless and artificial. there are talks about the alleged intention of russia at some stage to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, because today we saw firsthand how large the russian non-nuclear potential is. at the same time, russia is not used and even half of the possibilities and the launch of a one-time missile strike on the territory of ukraine, you completely ruled out noted during the cold war. nato officially had a doctrine of nuclear escalation for the sake of escalation,

which nato and the united states are now trying to attribute to russia, but during the cold war, nato was far inferior to the warsaw pact on non-nuclear conventional forces. the warsaw pact had a colossal advantage. that is why nato had to resort to its doctrine to use of tactical nuclear weapons. dmitry , the military potentials outside the nuclear sphere of russia and ukraine are simply not comparable in favor of russia today. we saw this potential, therefore, uh, well, it is quite obvious that russia has a colossal reserve, and military capabilities for uh, inflicting military damage to ukraine if such a task is set by non-nuclear means. it 's the first second when your position is uh, but uh, here's the thing. eh, first of all. eh, how are you? you know, no

worse, it is not ukraine that opposes me to russia collective west. and this, of course, gives another dimension of the balance of power and the second. i absolutely agree with you that it is not constructive for russia to talk about any possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons, and i have not, not the slightest. e information that russia is a weapon, but is going to use it, but i hope you will agree with me that if you were in the pentagon and planned possible situations , you would did not rely on a on your hope that it will never come to the use of such weapons. and the fact that the uh is at the top of the american administration. as the

admiral spoke about this, there is little en well, if you like, a healthy concern in order to prevent further escalations, then such concern, it is reasonable. for the general interests, including the interests of russia, i am wrong dmitry you are right. and, of course, the pentagon should consider all possible, including the worst-case scenarios for the development of the situation, but again, based on the real picture, which we have, based on the balance of power that we have and based on the fact that russia is really opposed to russia , in ukraine, is opposed to the collective west and its combined resources, the most likely escalation scenario is not at all the use of tactical nuclear weapons by russia in ukraine, but rather that russia is open in plain text. he has been saying for several weeks now that the threat of a direct military

clash between russia and the west is growing, which, if god forbid, it can also pass uh, nuclear level. but this is a completely different escalation than the one they are talking about in washington and now with regard to the policy of the united states of course in moscow despite uh, encouraging statements. e general malin and the words of john kirby spokesman for the national security council that a necessary political-diplomatic settlement than e. the sooner the better, moscow does not expect a change in the policy of the united states in the direction of abandoning support for ukraine. but here's what really pleased me in today's white house statement. it is that there is no intention to strengthen qualitatively this support. no, e p- at least, there is no readable intention to escalate on the part of the united

states. kiev, of course, is seeking this escalation. zelensky has already phoned president macron and chancellor scholz today. they agreed that an emergency meeting would be held tomorrow. the g7 countries and kiev, as zelensky's administration has already stated today, will once again ask the united states and nato to establish a no-fly zone in ukraine over ukraine that is, in fact, to draw nato and the united states into a direct war with russia to start the third world war. it seems to me that the a in the biden administration do not want such a development of events and that the current, uh, today's russian missile strikes on ukraine have reduced, not increased, the likelihood of deliveries of precision-guided weapons to ukraine. yes, of course, russia will judge by cases, but dmitry, doesn’t it seem to you that the signal that russia sent today is really works in favor of the united states

minimizing the likelihood of a positive decision on the supply of high-precision missiles to ukraine. and yet, they began to more tightly control the completely insolent regime in kiev in terms of committing such terrorist attacks that could lead to an escalation that is undesirable for the united states. uh, dmitry. i'll be brief. i don't want to guess, especially in the run-up to the american elections, when domestic politics is mixed with foreign politics. and what exactly tomorrow or the day after tomorrow the byte administration will do and say, but i know one thing very clearly, that if russia had not done what it did, and in kiev they would immediately declare that this means that their actions were fully justified. and that it is justified to say that ukraine is on the right track and it means

that it needs to be provided with even more weapons in order to urgently launch a new offensive, given this, it seems to me that in moscow, but simply by analyzing the situation, they came to the conclusion that it is necessary, and the retributions that dmitry completely agrees with you tonight. regarding the importance of the domestic political factor in the united states, of course, on the eve of the midterm elections, it is unlikely that the white house will do something that, a, can hypothetically be used by the republicans as a manifestation of weakness and e, which, accordingly, would weaken the position of the white house, but everything - from a strategic perspective, even within the united states, i see encouraging signals, and they are that the need to move to a policy of diplomatic settlement and peace. they say even so different representatives, but american. well, if you like,

near a political party or beau monde, like former president donald trump and billionaire elon musk. they are very different from each other, but today they are talking about the same thing, which is maintaining the status quo, including the preservation of current american politics . povy. there are risks of escalation, and in this regard, it is urgent to somehow change the policy and try to reach a diplomatic solution, including, and above all, between russia and the usa and i hope that and since the mask and the trump are indeed followed by millions. and these people are idols for millions of ordinary americans. i would like to hope that over time this point of view will enjoy more and more support and will influence the policy of the united states from within anyway dmitry thank you so much for this one. i think it's a very interesting conversation. we will now break for a short commercial and continue in a

few moments. the bullet was removed right on borodino field and on a cart, which had only three wheels bandaged vorontsov, they took the creak of this cart to the infirmary. he remembered for the rest of his life the great vorontsov dynasty. on saturday at the first palace, the east is very close to the west and it turns out that they have more similarities than differences, but in order to achieve this harmony , vorontsov had to put 24 years of his life into it. the halva card is surprised by guarding the free installment plan of 10 months of halva, as before, it weighs nothing to you. still zero interest on installments and no maintenance fees hulk weightless installment is a significant advantage. this is

an advertisement for the drug kagocel without exaggeration and double meanings. after all, from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of the symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus, and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, so kagocel is a higher antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them at the pharmacy. i will have time to issue a tinkofflex card with the design of famous paintings before october 16 and get free service forever tinkoff he is the only one proven virus can cause blood clots

natural medicines. ginkoum protects against blood clots reduces blood viscosity and improves memory ginkoum from the company. yes, i live with him, he has faster internet, special offers and benefits of up to 40% on fast internet for the whole family on mts.ru, the vtb team will offer a solution. order a free card from vtb, you get 1,000 rubles. cashback 2% for everything you are used to and utility bills without commission. order a free vtb card right now. go to vtb everything will work out every day. this is life. are you on time? you definitely calculated everything, you have enough forces. you take good care of your health. here aquadetrim, he returns strength, supporting the nervous

system, immunity, muscles and bones aquadetrim vitamin. the latest generation d is better absorbed than other forms of aquadetrim, the number one vitamin d. premiere in the online cinema kions you at dawn. swear that you will be faithful and you will not give life to one bourbune there is a historical blockbuster series union of salvation time of anger, watch online movie theater . who helps me to strengthen the immune system the season of colds new vitrum immunoktiv in it even more selenium, zinc and vitamin c the formula is enhanced with beta-glucoins that help activate the immune system everything for health in a unique complex of vitamins and minerals a novelty in a liter of nails for him, maximum income for strong immunity is 10% in every grocery with an all-terrain vehicle card they explain

intelligibly. pay everywhere here, yes, and get income. get all-terrain vehicle cards for free and get a 10% cashback in any grocery postal bank care from pyaterochka discounts for you milka cake 1390 diclofenakes in a package with a little man contains a maximum concentration of the active substance 5% gel. diclofenac alternative high- quality patriotic one what where when the autumn series of games on sunday on the first in the big game big bookmaker venline general partner of the russian premier league there is a big

game on the air, and in the context of the aggravation of the military conflict in ukraine that we are seeing right now and related to this e increased risks. uh, the escalation of this conflict, its flow to the level, russia, nato again strengthened the voices in favor of a political and diplomatic settlement, but not through russian ukrainian negotiations. and through the russian-western russian-american deal. here, in particular, this weekend, the minister of defense of romania, a. vasily haze. eh, listen to what he said. world powers nato the us should negotiate security guarantees for ukraine and peace with russia it would be ideal to sit down at the negotiating table, even if it ends in a freeze of the conflict, negotiations will still bring more benefits than what is

happening now the destruction of human lives and property. well, at the same time, the romanian minister suggested simply discarding the nonsense that it is impossible to discuss ukraine without ukraine and openly stated in the same interview, since ukraine itself cannot agree on the loss of its own, e, former territories, then, respectively. this is a decision for her, uh, they must make, uh, back, turkey goes even further than uh, romania and is already going to organize a corresponding russian western meeting, the turkish newspaper melen writes about this, listen, turkey plans to sit at the same table with this plan has not yet been brought to the attention of all western capitals by russia, the united states, france, germany and great britain through private channels. the first comments from influential figures in washington are very positive. well, today

this turkish initiative was already commented on by the press secretary of the president of russia dmitry peskov , who said that, in principle, russia is ready, and to discuss this idea with erdogan at the highest level already during the next meeting between russian and turkish presidents, which will take place this week, and within the framework. uh, summit meeting on interoperable confidence building measures in asia in astana on 12-13 october. the president of russia and uh, the president of turkey and alekseevich will meet there, and again in the context of the risks of escalation that everyone is talking about right now , uh, as far as possible, uh, such a deal or such talk about a russian-western deal, oh which the turks say a and e, about which e, says, the romanian, the minister of defense. conversations,

as you just told our viewers yourself, it’s quite possible, because these conversations are going on, but you need to understand that e negotiations , this key word, it can be used in very different contexts, firstly, there is, e, the problem of negotiation manipulation, that is uh, there is such a point of view in the west that it would be good, well, there is a point of view that the conflict should be continued, uh, and we must strive in every possible way to escalate it, this is a point of view that still dominates in the west, but in the west there is also a point of view such that a might be better off hurting russia not through the escalation of the conflict, but through the freezing of the conflict, and in this context the topic of negotiations is also used. yes, that is, the manipulation of negotiations in order to do something, but in the form of freezing the conflict on such terms that will not be beneficial to russia. then

there is another option for the manipulation of negotiations, when some countries try to gain their countries to raise, acting as various intermediaries and as completely fair to the other day, the russian foreign ministry noted that there are no shortcomings in mediation proposals. and this , too, is the place to be and, unfortunately, these manipulations of the negotiations are the subject of the negotiations of the negotiations. they outweigh the real need for negotiations that exist. if we are talking about negotiations that would be equal in rights and really lead to some kind of objective deal, maybe a deal is not a very good word for some really. e such vza. acceptable arrangements, then in such

there is nothing wrong with negotiations. and of course, they should be conducted, but so far the topic of negotiations prevails in such a manipulative way, moreover, it prevails, both from the side of the western, uh, expert and political community, and from ukraine, which is also the subject of negotiations from time to time . uh, speculating from my point of view. these are real negotiations, which would be negotiations of the parties that are interested in a real resolution of the crisis situation. it's very hard to drive now. why because russia plays in many ways open? uh-huh russia has no hidden position. and this, frankly, is not very convenient for negotiations, because after all, negotiations are usually, as they are, that there are requests for positions, then there is a struggle for concessions. equal, uh, and then

a compromise is reached. now russia has no bidding position, we don't have russia playing. e enough in the open russian positions are those that are declared and marked with a red line. they do not imply any clearance in order to give at least something in them. this could be the end last year at the beginning of this year, when russia put forward diplomatic proposals. and then the russian foreign ministry said that this is our proposal for an honest deal here, in fact, there is nothing to bargain about. maybe, about some minor details and in these conditions, when russia plays such an honest open game , it is very easy to manipulate it from the other side, because they may try to present the russian honest position as if they were asking for it. and demand

from russia to move beyond the red lines that are beyond which russia cannot withdraw. you quite rightly discussed this in the first part with dmitry simes and from such positions to enter into negotiations. perhaps only if there is a conscientious negotiator on the other side. it’s not from the side of the kiev regime or from the west that we don’t see such an honest and responsible negotiator, but we see a lot of manipulation of topics. uh, topic of negotiations. it's true, but at the same time we can see from the west frightened uh, negotiator or frightened side, which is simply based on a sense of self-movement and self-preservation. can go on some kind of hypothetical deal, because after all, and you when you say that we

raised similar questions at the end of last year, but at the end of last year in the west. it seems to me that they were not completely sure whether russia is bluffing or not going to bluff, whether it will seriously escalate to a military action or not. right now, russia has clearly and completely shown that it is not bluffing, that russia is ready to defend their interests their territory their security with weapons in their hands today's missile strikes on kiev and other ukrainian cities have confirmed russia's commitment to those red lines that russia has discussed many times in the west, speak of the threat of escalation. and in this context. it seems to me that at some stage a political will may appear, but not, for, uh, so to speak, russian ukrainian negotiations. this is extremely unlikely, namely for some kind of russian western deal to prevent. e. uh, the third world war, in fact, did, maybe, but

there is a need for such an agreement, but what i tried to explain to reach it through this uh, house veil and thick e games and manipulation of topics of negotiations will be quite difficult to say negotiations . it seems to me that here they are very repulsive, they scare away, and, uh, they bring in this one here is superfluous, ah, but understandable. and at the same time, you know, as he said, that there is nothing to talk about, but there is something to agree on, yes, because we really need to negotiate the positions they declared clear. we just need to join these positions, it seems to be bargaining, no, but there is something to agree on. here, uh, in addition to uh, a direct military clash between russia and the west in europe, especially in europe, many are worried about the threat of an escalation of a hybrid war. ah, the elements of which were the explosions of the

northern streams and although the days of denmark and sweden do not want to let russia e to these investigations. and and but at the same time, the united states launches a reconnaissance aircraft whose reconnaissance aircraft accidentally flew in exactly that place and exactly in that, uh, at the time where uh there were also explosions. here, nevertheless, uh, in the west they are afraid of further steps in this hybrid war, and those statements that are made explicitly or implicitly still indicate that in europe they understand who actually most likely committed uh , these terrorist attacks against the northern streams, who is interesting and what russia can answer to this by the way, today vladimir putin stressed that ukraine was preparing. uh, explosions, and the turkish stream is also like that, but in europe they are already happening. uh, enough scary stuff for them. here just this morning. his island bronchole

was left without electricity. the reason is the problem with the cable laid along the bottom of the baltic sea, which supplies electricity. this island yesterday, the biggest collapse, uh, with the railroads. e in germany, the reason again. uh, cable problem financial. the times already writes that these episodes show the extreme vulnerability of critical infrastructure in europe and in particular. e in germany a. i. ya. i want to ask alexander mikhailovich here. and here is the risk of an infrastructure war. this is the risk of terrorist attacks against critical infrastructure. isn't this an incentive for the west to still come to some kind of deal, some kind of agreement with russia, at least in the region. d escalation. after all, indeed. uh, economic well-being depends on this infrastructure. and i'm not afraid of the word economic survival. ah, the current world

economy. well, let's continue, then, alekseevich said in general regarding the russian position. but what you are asking concerns, first of all, the current alignment of forces, because in fact what we have. today, i said this clearly , our president, the world that was such a world will no longer need to be made of it. which conclusion that today's confrontation lies flat is completely different. today we have a struggle, first of all, america with us and not only with us, with our potential and existing allies for a new world order. and when we talk about that on the polar world. no, these are not empty words. this suggests that today they are uniting around russia, including those who understand that the true attitude towards countries as partners that see both allies in russia and russia sees them as an ally are built completely on other principles, i encountered a desire. america to save

the old world at any cost and europe today is a victim of these efforts. ukraine is generally a tool that today is burying ukraine itself has already buried it. but what we are seeing in europe is happening before our eyes europe as such and in economic terms is no longer politically weakened policy. you look look at these people who go they are not able to clearly formulate a position that protects the interests of their own peoples. they sacrifice interests, filling not only ukraine with weapons, but do not destroy their own economy. they are ready. and what can i say, the macron puts on a sweater, says, let's not be ready to warm up. he has his hesitations related to whether to include or not to include. the nord stream led to decisive action on the part of the americans, they already blew up this corpse-rod. for what, to stop these hesitation, to strike out of policy fluctuations all you have is your choice that today there is only one buyer of american gas and

fight russia with arms supplies. everything is for ukraine , there is no independence of europe today europe does not exist for america and they will sacrifice for what to save the world. and if it ever becomes a question of negotiation, it will only be negotiation between what is left of america's allies and perhaps, uh, russia's sat-allies in these matters today as well. there is a level of negotiations. there is a solution to issues, but again what is it about world order, but not about the old is not returning to the old, so i'm sure russia is demonstrating today. you look in astana who is coming. we're not talking about the highway already. we are talking about astana. if you name and list the president or the head of states that will be represented there, this is an essential view. today , the observer is the countries that have such a conditional relationship with the cis, but they strive, because there is a solution to all issues that are urgent today. well, i totally agree with you

a hypothetical deal, perhaps only between russia and the united states in the european union , european countries have no subjectivity. and by the way, today's statement by josep borel of the official representative, and the high representative of the european union for foreign affairs and security policy and ursula fondleyin, and that europe will not give up military support to ukraine will help her for so long. as much as it takes, just says that there is nothing to negotiate with these guys, a whether it will be possible to agree on something with the united states. we will see a deal with the united states, but definitely not with europe, but in europe the socio-economic crisis is aggravating, and last weekend in the largest european cities in berlin, paris, rome, vienna, prague, thousands of people protested. only in berlin

about 8,000 people came out this is only the last police. yes, according to the organizers, but much more. and against this background, against the backdrop of these protests against the backdrop of the economic and energy crisis. yes, and the demands of the protesters, of course, to achieve a price reduction by which, by resuming the import of russian energy carriers, the abolition of anti-russian sanctions, the refusal to support ukraine and the end of this conflict, the politician through diplomatic means, and against this background, the european commission today announced that in the light of russian e-missile strikes on kiev and other ukrainian. cities will again discuss anti-russian sanctions. they barely suffered, the eighth package of anti-russian sanctions after the referendums and accession. e entry into the composition russia of the new four subjects is again raising the issue of sanctions and most importantly. bloomberg reports that the european commission is developing

legislation to confiscate those russian assets that were once arrested by the european union and last week during the summit of the informal european union in prague , polish prime minister mateuszmorowiecki announced the same idea of ​​confiscation , who suggested simply sharing the frozen ones. uh, €350 billion worth of russian assets between ukraine and the european union, which means, of course, part of these assets. uh, to transfer to poland which, according to marowetsky, more than others, but helped ukraine, that's how similar initiatives are to you. judgment in the context of those protests that continue to discredit themselves in european countries is not even funny, and today, eh, hmm, as a subject of diplomatic and other relations in the world, europe simply does not exist. it is no longer perceived even by the common population by its own population. and i really hope that all this excitement they will bring

not at all to the return of something, namely to change. here are these persons, insignificant from the point of view of political status, who for some reason imagined that they could make the destinies of the world. they cannot decide their own fate. and today we'll see what the people. it seems to me that he is able to make a decision that the change of political power will lead to the fact that we do not need it. there friends are our partners. there are brothers and sisters, we need sane politicians who are aware of the responsibility to their own people, who understand that this is a responsibility extends to the neighbors as well, and today the irresponsibility of current politicians leads me to escalate tension, and most importantly , to the destruction of their own people. they've lost. uh, already contact with him. after all, we are not talking about the fact that social conflicts will continue even if they have assumed social obligations that they are unable to fulfill. after all, they have spawned there such that

today there is an elementary blackout. for a while it will come to the point that people will just sweep them away and forget about it and i really, hopefully, very i hope that some subjectivity will arise there, which will lead to the emergence of politicians who will be able to at least raise questions or stop this unnecessary escalation. but the main thing is that today there is an economic problem. and today this one here. eh, no need to look for big problems there . or rather, look for many causes of the problem. yes , economic america has felt that in its struggle with china and with us it cannot oppose its own economy with an economy made up of services not an economy made up of consisting of production is working and they need to take this production. and here it is necessary to strike such an economic blow in a good sense and propose moving the economy not towards america, but towards us, because we also have raw materials, and most importantly, a guarantee that today i am confident in today's step. russia

demonstrates that it will provide security not only to its own people and our allies, but also to those who want to see russia as a partner in the economic game. that's just about china and russia's relations with other non- western countries. we'll talk in a few moments. it's humor then there's some thought behind it no worries worth thinking. no, defense of this and attack. on this. i never saw it again. mikhail mikhailovich began to squat springily, then quickly rolled himself a walk instead of walking medicine instead of things and a very healthy lifestyle that replaced life itself. they have galls. what were the corks dry, my friend, zhvanetsky