by smuggling and speculation , all major raids and thefts were personally at my disposal to coordinate with me. the main thing is to do everything quietly . my militia merchants compose a novel about you, but you take a lot, but not least, i do without mokruha. uh, aged sami you're really chekist really your friend or enemy sniffed out everything, and now sit pinkerton. but i am sure that he is very stupid fried and everyone will stay alive, we will vote. cinema one tv presents a challenge to everyone clarified. i want to remind you that i don't exist, i don't exist. this place doesn't exist no one needs to know.

how did we get to know you. missed the third time is true, the mission of amethyst military prosecutor. that is your objective enemy. well, who is my friend of cinema here? one tv presents according to the laws of wartime

the general partner of the fantasy project, vtb bank, switch to a fantastically profitable vtb debit card and everything will work out.

all the time i think that if i ran away then with you. in the forest, let at least five days. well, they would have caught us, put us to shame, maybe.

help.

lord punished, brother. so that you

know? you distorted my life, you yourself deprived. thanks, i won. my

truth good evening on the air big game today the russian armed forces continued to inflict massive strikes on the ukrainian military and

energy facilities. and today, a very intensive and important day in terms of international politics and diplomacy, vladimir putin held two meetings in st. is devoted to security at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, then the meeting with the president of the united arab emirates touched upon a wide range of issues, including the military conflict in ukraine, the day before the ministry of foreign affairs of the united arab emirates stated that this visit was aimed at achieving, i quote , effective political solutions political solutions to the ukrainian conflict, to reduce the military escalation and achieve a political settlement, that is, abu dhabi is among those who play an important mediation in this matter. role and this is exactly what vladimir putin himself said today at a meeting with sheikh mohammed. listen . thank you for your mediation efforts,

which lead to the solution of a number of rather sensitive humanitarian issues. i know about your general concern about the development of the situation and about your desire to contribute to the settlement of all disputable issues, including the crisis that is taking place in ukraine, i want to note that this is indeed a significant factor that makes it possible to use your influence hmm in order to move in the direction. here, at the same time, there is reason to believe that we are talking about mediation not only and not so much between russia and ukraine, but between russia and the west , and that it is the russian-american deal that is needed to end the ukrainian conflict. time, they say, more and more often. for example , hungarian prime minister viktor orban. today he said that peace in ukraine is possible only on the

basis of negotiations between russia and the united states listen a truce should not be concluded between russia and ukraine but between russia and the united states, those who think that this war will be completed through russian-ukrainian negotiations do not live in this world. the reality looks different ukraine has sufficient resources of weapons and intelligence only because it is helped by the west and the united states so the americans must reach an agreement with the russians and then the war will end. and today, the head of the turkish ministry of foreign affairs, mevlut cavusoglu, said that it is the west that should speak with russia and that without a dialogue with moscow it is impossible to reach an agreement on a ceasefire and tomorrow in astana where it will be held simultaneously. there are already three meetings of this cis on interaction with a world of trust in asia and russia central asia tomorrow in astana, vladimir putin will meet with turkish president tayyip recep tayyip erdogan, who is actively promoting the idea of ​​​​a meeting in the format

russia usa great britain france germany for the last time, and the leaders of russia and turkey only spoke this friday, october 7th. here it is tomorrow will meet again, moreover in person and similar intensity of contacts at the highest level. it seems to me that it's clearly a no-brainer. finally, today the head of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, sergey lavrov, said that if the united states proposes a meeting between president biden and vladimir putin at the g20 summit , which will be held in mid- november, then moscow will consider this proposal vasevich it is pointless to talk about the ukrainian negotiations, by the way, state duma speaker vyacheslav volodin also recalled this today he said that ukraine has become a terrorist regime, but with terrorists. as usual negotiations and no one leads. but here's us. how do you assess, at least hypothetically, the prospects for a deal between russia and the west, which

some others are talking about, e. orban, turkey. eh, observer, you will agree that it would be nice to end this conflict through a meeting and an agreement and a deal. and vladimir putin and joe biden on the sidelines of the g20 summit . i have great respect from our to all these people. who did you say, but to me it seems that these people, in my opinion, are not very adequate to reality. for example, i don’t see the contours of a possible agreement so far, because so far the parties are very far apart from each other, the us administration does not give any grounds for us to expect that the us administration is ready to tell kiev in the near future. . shut up. accept certain conditions of russia and

negotiate this, by the way, about this. i said you start in the fourteenth year. being united states on all channels, which is to say. talking pointlessly with ukraine, it is necessary that moscow speaks with washington, it is not necessary that there be an agreement between these two parties. they even told me. well, putin will stop donbass with one call. i say, listen, i need even obama to call enough for biden to call and tell poroshenko. guys, in general, stop and agree, but the american side cannot agree to this, and even more so on the eve of the midterm elections. they will be afraid seem weak, and not be afraid when they say that here is another defeat of the west and the biden administration, there and so on, so

it would be good. i'm naturally both hands on it, but i just can't see it. that, uh, that draft of a possible agreement. i can imagine anything , but this is what i can't imagine yet. i completely agree with you. endroynik on sessovich, of course, the united states is conducting a hybrid war and is interested in continuing this hybrid war. but that's why all of a sudden talking about a deal? what is the russian western deal, because this is a hybrid war. now it has reached a certain level, it has reached a certain degree of tension, it has reached a certain escalation, which can continue to intensify and result in a third world war . turned to terror tactics against critical installations, the united states probably committed an act of terrorism against nord stream and both the first and

second russia and the beginning of the mother massed unprecedentedly, massed from the very beginning. special military operation missile attacks on ukraine that is, this is already the escalation that has occurred and now in russia they openly say that if the west does not change its policy, then the next step in the escalation may already be a direct military clash world war iii. and it was precisely to prevent this third world war that they started talking about a deal. and by the way, uh, the twenties will take place after the interims. let me just add two words. i just do not see the threat of a third world war. i only see something else. here in the west, our tens and hundreds of so-called dissidents, journalists, and so on, who fled from here, convinced themselves of themselves

ukrainians convinced and convinced the west that putin will never mobilize. and if you remember, we're on ours right away. program i said going to mobilize, raising the stakes having held referendums putin has radically changed the balance of power and this is not a clash with the west, as i have already then he said and now there is a question about the existence or non-existence of ukraine as a state. that's what they want to save. will they be able to do it? to be honest, i doubt it, because this image just came to my mind. ukraine for, uh, the west, and especially the usa, has become a suitcase without a handle. here, it seems to be impossible to carry, but throwing it away is somehow too expensive. and so they must decide for themselves. what a

bitter cup they are ready to drink here, i completely agree with you, but here, nevertheless, that the escalation that has already happened and that russia has proven that the russian red lines. must be respected. and that the answer is for the violation of russian red lines, the scale of this answer is inevitable. i think i surprised many in the west, yes, but this has already caused a certain tension in the west, and the result of which was the holding of an extraordinary extraordinary summit of the g7 at the level of heads of state today, yes, and dedicated. this e seven just came from the well of russian massive shelling, and the territory of ukraine and most importantly, what to do next? already yesterday , the german foreign ministry announced that the main issue on the agenda of the g7 summit is not even the supply of weapons to ukraine, but. it's just what to do politically with this conflict. at the summit

, vladimir zelensky, naturally, acted as an honored guest, said a bunch of nonsense, such as placing peacekeepers on e, ukraine, the belarusian border, that is, they can’t wait to draw the west directly into a direct war with russia. as a result of this today's summit, no decisions were made on, but the provision of weapons to ukraine , probably, these decisions will be made tomorrow at other meetings. in the meantime, the countries of the seven have already published a joint statement, which says, in particular, the leaders of the family support ukraine's commitment to a peaceful settlement of the conflict with russia and welcomes president zelensky's readiness for a just peace. what they are like in general , this is how we see from those points that are indicated on the screen the west does not change its policy not in the direction of escalation not in the direction of deyscalation. yes, that is, despite the escalation that has taken place, the policy of the west remains. well, something like this, and which she was at the same time, and the head of the french

foreign ministry, catherine column e, declares the need to maintain a dialogue with russia that russia will always be a neighbor of europe, russia's isolation was the best policy - i'm just quoting her, and the list-tras phrases, by the way, expresses concern, and about, but about future politics. the west is already at this summit today. e sevens she announced the need to convene an urgent meeting of the leaders of nato countries and stated that i quote we should not weaken our determination to help ukraine win one iota, that is, lystras clearly expresses concern that instead of a victory, ukraine is again starting to talk about peace about a political settlement, and ivan vasilyevich -first. how do you evaluate the result yourself is a big seven and secondly, the same question. you see, at least hypothetically, the prospects for a deal between russia and the west in the context of that escalation

which has already happened and may still happen. i evaluate the results of this virtual summit of the seven virtually like this, that is, the words uttered are all quite on duty, this is a set of lies , hypocrisy, untruth, which is structured into this in this statement, and from my point of view, in general , we can say that the west e, there is some indecision and some disagreements that sound from europe, and here are some statements that led to such divergent statements and these statements are actually more. and this indicates that apparently there is some confusion in washington, so the instructions are clear which line to take? uh, they didn't come. and so . uh, there are some confusion. i expect u

to meet. the next few days will be an attempt by the west to demonstrate that they are increasing military support for ukraine. but it will be , well, some, so to speak. uh, a demonstration that this is done with high quality. uh, increase support. i'm sure it won't. i think that the west of you as a whole has entered into this indecision. they do not understand. what to do, because in fact the calculation was that the ukrainian counteroffensive. it supposedly. everything changes the new strategic reality and they receive within two weeks. referendums accepting new territories as part of russia further, i won’t say enough of them. now there are still large, but very distinct blows on ukrainian territory, which shows that the act of terrorism against russia

will not go unanswered and it turns out that they thought that they made strong moves, and in the answer was received by such and political military moves, which, well, again, in general, returned. uh, besides that, as it was, russia retains the strategic initiative, russia retains. and well, he leads in general his game, therefore, in such conditions. this lack of decisiveness is starting to raise all the options again. yes, it’s like playing for time to shake the situation up a little, and among other things , the topic of negotiations arises, but i still don’t see russian western ones, but by the way, in washington all the last days it sounds the other way around, that this is russia should, allegedly from ukraine, speak with kyiv. e with the kiev regime in different formats. it sounds, but really many responsible people are starting to talk about russian westerners. uh, arrangements

from my point of view. can e. it is very clear to speak about the conditions under which an agreement could be reached. these are the conditions that russia put forward here, of course, the question arises that if we can do all this on our own with the help of a special military operation, then why do we need these agreements? i think this is a good question quite fair, but that factor of nuclear danger is suitable. and the one that is not even nuclear, if we move on to an open military clash. this is also slightly incomprehensible. i think it rather indicates that we should. develop some understanding of what mechanisms we have to prevent escalation, but this does not replace the fact that russia is able to fulfill all the tasks of a special military operation and achieve what we previously considered possible to

achieve only through agreements by the west. now we can achieve this on our own, if the west suddenly comes to its senses, takes a responsible position and says it’s not necessary, we understood everything and therefore comes to an appropriate agreement, but for now. indeed, well, there are not enough signals from the other side to say that they are ready for this, at least with the current leadership of the united states and in nato in western european countries, and for the foreseeable future together for a year, yes, and i am other writers exactly on this one. looked for, yes, here's another in today's statement. e countries the seven also contains a very noteworthy point, and i will quote it. the seven wants to explore ways to direct russian assets to the restoration of ukraine, that is, we are talking about the confiscation of frozen assets and their transfer to ukraine, and according

to bloggerberg, the european union is already studying, the possibility of adopting appropriate legislation to transfer here those frozen e assets that were, and russian and private and state arrested, respectively confiscate them and transfer the opportunity. e the same ukraine and alexander vyacheslavovich, this will deal an even greater blow to confidence in the dollar against the euro in western financial institutions. and this will strengthen the de-westernization of global governance. i'm sorry for being so complicated. yes. exactly. uh, especially since the pillar on which the whole model. inviolability, er, the right to private property, was built by socialism over the centuries. yes, but these pseudo-mortists are ready to destroy neo-trastkists for the sake of what , moreover, uh, they are destroying that their financial

system is what was the basis of their power, then, what gave them a permanent rent, what allowed them to just build a model not around non-realistic, but in order to milk the whole world in order for the whole world to pay for these issuing, essentially symbolic currencies. they supplied everything to them. well, i think that what is happening now around ukraine is part of a huge plan to demolish the model of the modern economy and, at least, to demolish the european economy, and they, uh, are not interested in any world europe must die and is uh. there is a special vanguard here these transplastic forces. these are the same green ones that simply destroy the industrial foundations. e of europe now they will destroy, moreover, the financial basis of europe, and as for the continuation of this war, i understand,

interference. uh, last year's rent. ren corporation published a report. he uh almost didn't learn about how they are going to wage war with us in ukraine they took the model of mosaic warfare. uh-huh this is uh, the so-called colonel model game, but a model for colonial wars, developed in 1921. very difficult mathematical model, which was really shortchanged to the end. just 10 years ago. and now they think that they are waging a colonial war there, and we seem to have agreed to this game with small forces. yes, i'm not a war. but when we raise the mobilization, when we start to strike, all this is no longer really a war. this is a superpower war. what can these clowns do? well, today, in addition to the hypothetical prospects for the russian western deal, they also talked about the risks of escalation. i would say that these two topics are in line with each other. in a dialectical connection, and the higher the risk of escalation, the more they talk about the russian

western deal. this is absolutely normal. so tomorrow they will continue to talk about the risks of escalation. uh, there will also be two meetings in brussels tomorrow. yes. two meetings. this is a meeting of nato countries at the level of defense ministers and at the same time, uh, a meeting. uh, the so-called contact group for support to ukraine, which coordinates the supply of weapons to ukraine, the so-called ramstein group will chair there, uh, again, us representatives are catching minister austin defense mark miles. uh, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the main question. of course, this is further, uh, building up or not building up. in any case, further assistance to ukraine. here, too, it seems like it really is. there is no final clarity yet. on the one hand, the white house today unequivocally stated that the united states is not looking for conflicts with russia and will not send troops to ukraine. this is the traditional position of the white house, which he has been adhering to since february 24

, on the other hand, yesterday joe biden in in a conversation, zelensky announced that he would send modern air defense systems to ukraine, american air defense systems, and today the white house has already announced that the first air defense systems are on sams. e will arrive in ukraine in the near future germany announced that it is also transferring to ukraine a german modern e, an air defense system and a resto of the four, which the first promised has already been transferred to kiev naturally. it is not enough. uh, the magazine foreign police influential american reports that yesterday the chairman of joy fanchuk sent a letter to congress, the united shta. which requires f-15 f-16, a fighters and long-range atmcm cms missiles that can fly with a range of over 300 km. and today, responding to this ukrainian request, the representative of the national

security council, john kerby, in an interview with abc, said that the united states does not exclude anything at all. yes, the decision has not been made, but the issue of the supply of long-range missiles, and ukraine, has not been removed from the agenda in russia, even the supply of american air defense systems is considered as a step that is being taken the united states to the participants in the military conflict, with all the ensuing consequences in terms of the risks of a direct military clash between russia, nato stated this unequivocally tonight just in response to yesterday's statement by the white house , russian ambassador to the united states anatoly antonov military products , including the latest designs. as another confirmation of the fact that washington was consolidated in status of a participant in the conflict, such assistance , as well as assistance to kiev with intelligence

instructors and orientation on the introduction of hostilities. this is a way to further escalate and increase the risk of a clash between russia and nato. and today, the risk of a direct military clash. russia nato, as a result of the continuation of the western policy of military assistance to ukraine, drew the attention of the deputy minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey alekseevich ryabkov. listen to his statement. moscow notes with regret that the ongoing large-scale assistance to kiev training of personnel of the armed forces of ukraine on the territory of the countries of the alliance providing intelligence satellite images in real time, up to determining the target for artillery strikes and planning the operation, increasingly involves western countries in the conflict on the side of the kiev regime, while leaders of various levels in there are calls for the united states and europe to defeat our country on the battlefield. russia will be forced to take adequate countermeasures, in

including an asymmetric one, it is obvious that a direct clash between the united states and nato is not in the interests of russia, we warn you and we hope that in your ton and other western capitals they will realize the danger of an uncontrolled escalation. these are the measures, including those of an asymmetric nature, that sergei alekseevich ryabkov spoke about. it seems to me that this is just the risk of a direct military clash between russia and nato . because now nato is waging a hybrid war against russia. russia says it can respond asymmetrically, i.e. not hybrid ivan vasilievich very briefly. here, russia has confirmed with its massive strikes that, and red lines are red lines. and by the way, all the western media and television and all the mainstream, e, newspapers, really came out with headlines that these massive strikes are the answer for the crimean bridge, that is, the reason for the investigative connection, russia has confirmed that it is committed to e answers if its the red lines are being broken right now russia unequivocally. he says what will happen if the west

continues this policy, especially if he will begin to supply long-range missiles or will generally increase the quality provided by military products, this warning will work. what do you think, and i think that's how i said. the west is in some confusion, so the signal has already been received, how they digest it and what decision they make, we'll see. it seems to me that maybe we, too, are not completely correct in conveying this signal, because, by the way, just like this, by the way, it manifests itself in your conversations with dmitry simons. when you talk, after all, as in the west exit looks like the situation was russian red lines, they say. the west has crossed them. russia is drawing new ones. and we'll push it a little more. it seems to them that they are moving the russian red leaves. crimean bridge. it seems to me that it clearly seemed no longer from my point of view. this is generally wrong. we do not move any red lines. see. from your point of view, the situation looks like. so we

had red lines at the end of last year. the west, well, first of all, the united states, those red lines. moved beyond no reds lines. no, they are in a minefield. that's the whole minefield with them at any moment. anything can happen, but they do not yet realize that they are on this field. they start talking about red lines. it looks to me like what they say, give us the cards. it is in the field that's where you can step on, as where everything is impossible . no red lines, no more. you are in a minefield at any moment, anything can happen. only one you get out of that red line, get out of the interchangeable field that was marked last year at the end of the last ah last year and from my point of view. here, uh, that 's all, uh, and deputy minister of foreign affairs ryabkov correctly said e. the question is not that we will start this conflict with nato, he said, uncontrollable, he was

looking for an uncontrolled risk. we are not interested in this. guys. this is the last warning. you are in a minefield at any moment. anything could happen. and it's not. well, that's it. sorry, this is all out of control, processes, important politics containment. we will now pause and continue in a few moments. think back to the moment you realized your mom thought you were a whore. pain is normal. you just need to be patient a little, and everything will be over. nothing hurts me. i fell asleep to see my wife not made up next to me. i kiss the persian cool, new series october 17 on the first weapon do you want an item? millions

of discounted items every day. open additional discounts. open about for the card in the application nitrogen tokyomo engine oil for 2.199 rubles. money is being transferred from your account. urgently tell the pin code to stop the operation. i ended the call, they are scammers. order a sim card on the tinkoff dot ru website and get the most effective protection against spam and scammers. he is so alone.

this is an advertisement for the drug kagocel without exaggeration and double meanings. after all, from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus, and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, therefore kagocel is the highest antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them in pharmacy. i just bought milk in pyaterochka at a very low price. where was she stopping back, how to contain the joy when we keep prices low on 1,500 items. behave profitably. appreciate the low prices milk station dairy for 59.99. what helps me to strengthen the immune system in the cold season new vitrum and monoktiv in it even more selenium, zinc and vitamin c, the formula is enhanced with

beta-glucoins, which helps to activate the immune system everything for health in a unique complex of vitamins and minerals new vitrum and nails, for a maximum of strong immunity, we were all brought together. content of five popular video services in one subscription for only 499 rubles. in a month, rostelecom technology opportunities, the vtb team will switch from pension to vtb, where every ten thousandth pensioner will receive as much as 100,000 rubles. and each pensioner is guaranteed to receive 1,000 rubles. switch to vtb and everything will work out proven virus can cause

blood clots natural medicine ginkoum protects against blood clots reduces blood weight and improves memory ginkoum from evalar and protects against blood clots and memory improves sovcombank in 3 minutes in two faces on one call, which in the form of eight and five percent per annum sovcombank is closer to people. oh , first of all, i didn't see anything. and secondly, i have more interesting things to do here. i live with him internet faster special offers forever tinkoff he is so alone what where when the autumn series

of games on sunday on the first in the big game big bookmaker winline general partner of the russian premier league re big game it is obvious that to achieve some big russian western deals with the current leadership of the collective west will be extremely difficult if they are impossible, and a clear confirmation of this was today's statement by stoltenberg's agent on the eve of tomorrow's nato ministerial meeting and that i quote russia's victory in the ukrainian conflict will be nato's defeat nato's defeat yes. that is, here, what else can be said, this is just a direct recognition that it is necessary to participate as a party. ah, this conflict

about the same, by the way, about the impossibility of negotiating with the current leadership. today spoke in the same interview, uh, that we talked about before the break viktor orban prime minister of hungary he said that with biden, biden is not the right side for the russian western deal and the hope for the world i quote viktor urban is donald trump and the unsuitability of the current democratic elite, and today the bright american politician tool segabard, who in the past was already a presidential candidate from the democratic party, has announced today, and today she announced her withdrawal from this very democratic a party that, according to tulsi gabrt, and i quote, is controlled by an elitist cabal of war mongers that is dragging us into a nuclear war. here is e. well, here, this is something that is in the democratic party, but the republicans have a more variegated picture. yes on

the one hand. there are senators like michmaconell and lens graham who are in favor of even building up military support for ukraine, but there are other senators as well. and the likes of missouri's josh holley roger williams and texas state rep . half-gossar, fox's new stacker carlson y which have a completely different approach. who are wondering if it is in the national or us interests to build up endless support for ukraine. where does this money go? will everything backfire, it's later. uh, so to speak, support for international international terrorism and the spread of this american weapon around the world, and isn’t it better now, when in america it’s not safe to spend money inside yourself, and therefore, as the washington post writes , citing e sources of the ukrainian government in kiev, it’s very very worried that when the republican party will win a majority, at

least in the house of representatives, and on current issues of public opinion, that is exactly what should happen. here's the latest polls show support for republicans 47% support for democrats 43%, 5%, and the gap this allows them to securely take the house of representatives. here is andronik in vsetsevichi. and after that, uh, now, do you share these concerns. uh, ukrainians that according to american military assistance and in general assistance to ukraine can be reduced and that the biden administration, most importantly it will be much harder to allocate this assistance due to the fact that the house of representatives will in every possible way put spokes into the wheels of everything that the baym administration does, ukrainians should be concerned for a completely different reason. the fact is that they themselves have driven themselves from their supporters into a dead end, and not much was said that they were winning. they will make the victory parade on red square. they

will be victorious over russia, and this is so much , it was brad in the entire ukrainian welfare sphere in all online publications and channels and that's why. they should think today only about saving their own scraps of their own state. if possible, save them, as far as the west is concerned. today, while i was going to the program, you know what i thought, i think, oh, in fact, that we are talking about the collective west, here is the usa of europe and so on, because today in the west between the usa and western europe and europe in general, there are relations that sometime after the sixty- eighth year were characterized by the brezhnev doctrine, you know, there was moscow yes brezhnev and moscow spoke you can do this, but he cannot

do this. by the way, oddly enough, for many years, while the soviet union was there, while the americans were vulnerable, they were afraid, and so on. they were more respectful of their partners and their ally today, they do not care about them, wipe their feet and demonstrate that these are all countries with limited sovereignty. they must be to the nail. it's just that once, by the way, sergey viktorovich lavrov said when he was asked, well, you met with clients. what's the difference, a hilary here's a meeting from a scandal? lavrov then said, you understand, we could not then talk scandals to rice, she said, you generally have questions. don't ask. you listen and do what we tell you this hillary says at least she listens to what we say, that is, today the americans

treat their western partners as if they were just some kind of rubbish. so you do. and do n't think about anything at all, so i think i want to go back to , i didn't say in the last segment the most effective way to solve this new problem. the most powerful blows to ukraine, i will tell you, they will sober everyone in washington. only strength they respect only strength, they see only determination and will. here is the manifestation of the will of determination and action. this is what guarantees that they will fly away from all this. and indeed, this suitcase will apparently be thrown away, because there is no need to carry it, and in general, there is no need to hold on at all. i fully

agree, indeed, that the united states respects force and retreats only before force is immutable. and as for the probable outcomes midterm elections, it is likely that the united states will at least plunge into a legislative aa, and into a legislative stupor in the process of passing the procedure. of course, of course, of course. and even if the senate or the senate, of course, does not confirm this, but the house of representatives will issue an impeach. to president baideno, and here is another country that is in a very deep domestic political and domestic economic crisis. and in general, there is already a question of territorial integrity. it 's, uh, great britain, it's only been a month since long as a sheet of trails. e, she moved to downing street and the situation in the country already seems catastrophic,

and complex, but catastrophic, and the rating of a liter is record-breaking. he is now worse than johnson's rating is fighting before he leaves, and in retirement, the conservatives are looking for a way to achieve an opportunity to endure or out of distrust before the first year of it passes, uh, the premiership, the labor party is ahead of the conservatives on all issues, and now the rating, uh , lead in favor of labor 30% points 30% points in favor, or risk. e party cause, of course, the colossal economic crisis, which was intensified. e the policy of the track itself, but the record fall of the pound sterling, the fall of the stock markets, the energy crisis, inflation and so on. and against this background, the scottish issue has aggravated today, the supreme court of great britain began a two-day hearing,

following which it will issue a verdict. can scotland hold the next referendum on independence a without the consent of london to the british government and parliament or not? yes and. uh, lately as the prime minister says, shuttle the first prime minister of scotland nicholas and storgin the number of supporters of scottish independence has increased significantly. yes, in the fourteenth year there was a referendum, then the majority was in favor of staying in the uk, but since then a lot has happened. and there was a brexit, which was opposed by the majority of the scots, just the current uh, uh, difficult economic situation is an extremely unpopular example. eh, listraz. igor georgievich here. how do you rate first prospects for scottish independence and secondly, how is the uk going to get out of the current complex crisis, i

emphasize once again both political and economic, and what are the prospects for the premiership, in fact, the list, well, absolutely right. uh, the definition of what it is a complex crisis, and what? uh. the worst thing is not even that he is a complex. and that it is still very long, that is, well, since the famous struggle for the national budget of david and george at the beginning of the 20th century. britain did not know such a long political crisis, i remind you, what began with brexit, then was an effort towards the species and the essence of the matter. now we see its continuation and indeed now. it is superimposed on both problems in economic development and problems in foreign policy. yes, britain has been put in charge of ukraine ah. it doesn't work out very well. yes, i didn't give a sheet of trails for nothing. actually, she initiated the convocation. and the meeting. yes , nato defense ministers where they will decide what to do, well, somehow it’s

not possible for her to perform this function with high quality, and i’m already looking forward to how she will be called. eh, soon. yes, some go nickname. if you recall that it was not blair who was called mr. poodle. bush, yes, then, well, probably a lapdog. i don’t know any other something, really, maybe, that’s why he really is in a very difficult situation in the country and er, in fact, of course, now i would put all my strength into solving economic problems, but here does not work. yes, more and more it is, for example, it resembles such a country, not learned by the trigger. the loudest promise of the trails sheet is to freeze the prices of electricity and e, on the other hand, you understand that the situation is hopeless says, well, get ready , we may be turning off. uh-huh electricity, apparently. she forgot that in the early seventies this story. in general, it was worth , uh, the chair of the prime minister to another conservative prime minister, edward, hits, which the population

endured. just due to the fact that they turned off the electricity during the miners' strike, that's why the situation. in my opinion. it is very difficult in the country, with regard to the referendum, then current rules, of course, the scots can not hold a referendum without, uh, consent, and the entire mentoring parliament, the entire parliament, clearly and repeatedly, starting to gather from johnson to speak. no, that is, after all, already, uh, some lessons have been learned from the fact that, probably, in a country where uh. the entire political system was built on a representative democracy of acceptance. tools of direct democracy, but not always effective. and yes, and in general, the brexit example showed that something else was expected, and the population voted - this is how it was voted, therefore, of course, the central government. will never give permission for the scots to hold a legal referendum, as they did in the fourteenth year. here, that referendum was completely, what is called by the letter of the law, but here it really is. now

the supreme court has intervened. yes, a relatively new structure. and here it is necessary to recall how it appeared. yes, until 2009. and when the supreme court began to work, it did not exist. and these functions belonged to whom the house of lords, that is, happiness parliament. yes, that is a classic feature. yes , the separation of powers. it just didn't exist in 2005. they adopted the law. i decided to correct the situation. well, how to fix it, they simply took these lords and lords, or rather the appeal committee, were transplanted into neighboring buildings. yes, it’s true, they have been doing repairs for 4 years, so only from the ninth year. who started working and left all the same functions, adding this little appendage that the supreme court can consider cases related to devolution, because, in fact, the main its function is to consider an appeal. yes, well , devolution, yes, that is, with the transfer of powers , which took place and, in general, is still happening, and it is under the jurisdiction of the supreme court. and here we see another very

interesting trend. that the further, the more the judiciary begins to be drawn into british politics . this happened for the first time when brexit was discussed and there were also appeals to the court and relevant court decisions. now this also applies to domestic politics, therefore, uh, how the situation, but it will be resolved, what verdict the judge will issue is unknown, but there is another problem. this is northern ireland where too. in general, e situation. eh, it's moving. in my opinion, there is a very high probability that the uk will lose this province. the very near future, therefore the situation is very difficult in britain and in. in general, until you see the color at the end of the tunnel, yes, and like their older brother today, uh, which many call devide stays america and the divided states of america here is great britain may become a devider kingdom yes, in fact, it is already a divided kingdom, but the uk is such a symbol and a bridge of trans-

atlantic relations. and we have already said many times at this table on this program that today the atlantic relations are an example of such classical neo-colonialism. about realism, not not the atlantic community and more precisely , not only the atlantic community in relation to the countries of africa, latin america and asia, but neo-colonialism in the united states in relation to european countries that the united states is directly hindering the development of europe ah? solving their own economic problems. and now, apparently for someone in europe it began to reach. here, in my opinion, revolutionary is simply a revolutionary statement. today the minister of economy, finance, industrial and digital sovereignty did. it is interesting that they also have the word sovereignty, and france is the brunel mayor. listen to what he said, we must not let

the ukrainian conflict result in us economic dominance and europe's weakening in in a situation where washington is selling its liquefied natural gas for four times what its own industrialists are unacceptably convinced that the economic glory of europe is not in anyone's interest. we must reach more balanced economic relations in the energy issue between our american partners on the european continent. and aleksandrovich how do you think the process went, they finally understood where they are leading, the current policy and is it worth expecting such statements not only from france, but there is still a strong galician e, tradition, so to speak, national pride, but also from other representatives of the european union well, we 'll see how they survive the winter, because understanding is one thing. i believe that each of them can get the works of marx and see what kind of crime they are, to which they would commit

capitalists for 300% of the profit, but will this make them warmer in winter. eh, it's not clear. uh, what i noticed on the site of the daurian forum was the study of riots in europe, that is, they begin historical modeling. and what awaits them? and if anything means it will start. and this is already serious, because, uh , liberta, uh, when it sounded, did your head fly? there are a lot of people dancing for concord and in other squares, and i think that they will remember their history , remember and be horrified. where they have taken their country, but i think that here their game is over. well, that is, getting out of the chains of tenacious paws in america will not work quickly. only if america itself happens. well, uh, it seems to me that uh is not only and not so much an elite as an elite. but the

brunette made a similar statement, but simple eu citizens they are fine. it seems to me that they understand that if the policy of the united states drives them into d-industrialization, they will lose their competitiveness. yes, and by and large into poverty, then the traditional existing energy and economic relations with russia gave them prosperity. gave them the opportunity to strengthen their competitiveness at the expense of. russian cheap energy resources and the market, including, should not be forgotten. the russian market also had e, for them it is of great importance and now at the level ordinary citizens. this is understood. yesterday , thousands of rallies were held in saxony, and with the demands, and the lifting of anti-russian sanctions, rapprochement with russia and the resumption of normal e-e relations with it, at least energy ones, and it seems to me that if in european countries in the countries of the european union they still come to

the authorities are more nationally oriented elites, not atlanticly oriented elites, but nationally oriented elites, and their policy will change accordingly, then russia will go to the resumption of energy cooperation with them is not within the radius of the same cooperation. for the sake of gaining profit and restoring balance, and in the picture of russian foreign economic relations we agree, but with the general scheme, dmitry vyacheslavovich i agree, yes, that, uh, well, firstly, really ordinary people show themselves more openly than european politicians. simply, because european politicians are forced to listen to washington , ordinary people, when, excuse me, they just express their point of view if they come more nationally oriented forces. yes, but uh, most likely, the restoration of cooperation will not happen on the previous ones.