lead me to the dungeon will you be like this? or maybe the restaurant will now allow everything? do no more. i know that my brother served the most. do not rush.

to help goodbye. live

fedor live happily ever after. lord for what? award-winning chefs and acclaimed culinary masters take off their hats after testing baki products and congratulate them on being awarded the award for excellent taste bad makes your dish taste better new series. today we are a psychologist. we will try to minimize personally.

deal. it has the highest dosage for better penetration into the muscles large package at a bargain price. only in the okko online cinema

, we have preserved for you the taste of the bright sun and the power of fire in every seed of jamie, so that in an instant at the click you enjoy the seeds of gin we know we love and we eat . watch online cinema. where the relatives of the flight 245 that crashed today on the dudlin mountains begin to gather in the dudlin mountains, did nobody survive? yes? heard about your brother condolences two passengers

registered for a flight on board the aircraft moms got up, what does it all mean about this catastrophe. he cannot fail to understand that we are all on our ears here. why he does not call, no opinions. igor , this does not surprise you, my brother's wife, since i began to notice that my husband was staring at her completely, i am not embarrassed that the end of innocence is happening. so why are we going to grandma's ? congratulations. how are you feeling? normal, as always, so goat? i will no longer leave you from a wife who does not love a child, father, meritorious. moreover, the official is married.

see, all series on movie one tv movie one tv presents he said it would be our second month rented. that's what idiot decided to call her titanic. ask the nurse. i'll take it all right. well, he wanted to see you. and this is not my husband, but somewhere home sashka you are a songwriter, but i know about it, only my relatives. the thirst for self-expression haunts you, and your friends say that a big stage is crying for you. you are

full of creative ideas. you are ready to give this world something new then this is your time. we call you on the big stage, fill out an application and participate in the international competition of authors and who knows, perhaps your song will be appreciated by the best producers, and your favorite idols will perform. uh-huh become a part of a big ambitious project and prove that your name should sound throughout the country with the detailed rules of the russian song contest, the author's sign on the official website and on the project's social network vkontakte

, in this sense, i will have time to issue a tinkoff black card with the design of the famous painting before october 16 and get free service forever tinkoff he is such a single diamond of the imperial

majesty appeared a pure diamond i think that it will not be difficult for you to have an affair with any of the courtiers above your head, but even then she was vilely incapable of choosing the wrong person. andrey what does my brother have to do with palace depravity? the fact is that the person i was talking about is very close to the emperor. and when your brother, having escaped the tablecloth, came to his house seeking refuge, they were childhood friends. this man

betrayed your brother and sent him back. until those as long as he is close to the emperor, no paper will be signed. not just ivan of imperial majesty major starshov. you are not indifferent. yes , you're probably right, we're going too far, i ca n't trust you, go back to skill. think again, remember that there are very powerful people involved here. i trusted you, if you suddenly decide to take a step back, they

will remove my head. and i warn you, you too. i agree. hands i must see your hands enter, gracious sovereign, by the highest command i the maid of honor of her imperial majesty has been appointed, i ask you to meet and expect. now the blue room.

don't let anyone in here. what happened

to me is nothing simple ivan petrovich since you and i, here i am. i understand that andrei is not an angel. let's go my brother, and you were once friends, what's wrong with him? how to let go? what

happened i'm sorry you hear yourself andrey i really want to save. sonya and others are happy

. good evening, the big game is on air today. vladimir putin spoke at the international forum of the russian energy week and once again reminded terrorist methods of the kiev regime, as well as who is the beneficiary of such a policy, listen i have already said that the regime in kiev has long used terrorist methods, organizes political assassinations, ethnic cleansing, massacres of civilians, then post it on the internet themselves . they erase it right there, but still sits, which remains does not stop before nuclear terrorism, meaning the shelling of the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, yes, and uh, committing terrorist attacks around the kursk nuclear power plant of russia in this series, of course, and attempts to undermine the turkish stream gas pipeline, i repeat, all the facts have been proven and documented, and the ideologists who

order these crimes are their ultimate beneficiaries. benefit to the acquirer. those who benefit from instability and conflicts, and who is behind the sabotage on the nord streams is obviously the one who seeks to finally break the ties between russia and the european union, wants to finally achieve e, undermine and finish off political subjectivity europe weaken its industrial potential to seize the market. well, a hint, what is called transparent? this is, of course, the united states today. here is the chairmanship of united states secretary of defense floyd. austin and the chief of the joint chiefs of staff mark miles in brussels , a new meeting of the contact group for military support of ukraine, also called the rammstein group, was held at the same time. brussels is hosting a nato defense ministerial summit. however, a much more important center of the world

politicians. today, tomorrow and the day after tomorrow, astana has become the capital of kazakhstan where three meetings are being held at the same time, this is the meeting on interaction, confidence building measures in asia, the cis summit and the russia summit will discuss, including ukraine, new turkish ideas for resolving this conflict. through the russian-western deal and in recent days in the context of the escalation of the military conflict in ukraine that we are now witnessing this is the idea of ​​a deal between russia and the west, and above all russia and the united states, has been discussed more and more often, and today we will discuss the prospects for such a deal, the possibility of a meeting between vladimir putin and joe biden on the sidelines of the g20 summit in bali this november, as well as the prospects for the policy of the

united states regarding ukrainian conflict in general with the president of the center for national interests, dmitriy saimos, who is in washington dmitriy good evening. good evening dmitry dmitry but the president is biden. uh, gave an exclusive interview yesterday tv company cnn, including talking about russia and the possibility of a hypothetical meeting with vladimir putin at the g20 summit. and as it seems to me in this interview, he made very contradictory statements on the one hand. he described vladimir putin as a rational player. that is, if this is a rational player, then you can negotiate with him, you can make deals, but, on the other hand, answering the question. is biden ready to meet with putin? he said that, in principle, he he sees the need for this, that he is not ready to discuss ukraine without ukraine and about,

he is ready to talk with putin only about american prisoners in russian prisons. listen to exactly what the president of the united states said in this interview. would you like to meet vladimir putin at the g20 summit i'm not going to meet him, but it all depends on what he wants to talk about at the g20 if he wants to discuss the jailing of britney griner, then i'm open to dialogue. in general, this is our position. and i already voiced it at the g7 summit not to discuss ukraine without ukraine itself. so i am not anyone else who is not ready for negotiations with russia about their presence in ukraine and the consolidation of any ukrainian territories from russia and so on. it all depends on what putin wants to discuss listen, he acts cruelly very cruelly. i believe he is a war criminal. so i don't see the point in meeting him now. and dmitry how do you evaluate these statements? how do you interpret them? is this some sort of signal

how do you assess the prospects for this very deal between russia and the west on the ukrainian conflict in the current situation? wells of this very conflict and look at dmitry. uh, president biden. you think he made a statement that is so contradictory. you are right, it is contradictory, because america has conflicting interests and president biden, as a politician, on the eve of the upcoming midterm elections in november at the beginning of november, the origins of the intermediate interests, one of these interests is very clear. and he wants to show that american actions in ukraine were significantly more successful than american actions in afghanistan, uh, where the united states ended up throwing the afghan government to its

own devices to power. the taliban have arrived. and the united states was forced out of there. well, as everyone writes in the american press, actually run. ah, in the case of ukraine, uh bydny, i want to show that if he is not yet winning, then he certainly is not losing. and that he fully supports the ukrainian allies. although formally ukraine allies is not, of course, one interest, but rather another interest. it is to prevent the united states from getting involved. uh, not having themselves. eh, in this. e no intentions with the help of ukraine did not get involved in the third world war. here. listen to what mein said about this in the same interview, my general message is that everything that happens can lead to a terrible ending and not

because someone is going to turn. it's in a world war or something like that, but just after you use a nuclear weapon, there is always the possibility of miscalculation, who knows what will happen? and it happens and then everything will turn into armageddon. so the stakes are high, i really attributed it, and to putin about the statement that russia will use tactical nuclear weapons, or at least they can use, uh, tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine i am not familiar with such statements, in my opinion, there are none, but everyone it is clear that if a direct clash grows, a direct military clash between the united states and russia, then nothing can be ruled out. and i think that president biden, as a person, not young, remembering the cold war, still remembering, but the cuban

missile crisis. uh, the anniversary is in a few days. this was in the sixty-two. and so on, the world was indeed closer to the possibility of a catastrophe. i think president biden. quite healthy. i thank him for this. i respect curves, but he wants to avoid war, uh, which could be a disaster for all mankind, and for this he is ready to meet putin. this is not what biden said, of course he said that he would not discuss ukraine with president putin, he would, uh, condemn, discuss possible, but exchange of people who are in prisons americans, uh, who are in prison in russia and vice versa are in prisons in the united states but dimitri, i'll ask you a simple question. well

, you imagine that two presidents will meet at the g20. and no matter what this short meeting was. uh, here they will talk about the exchange of prisoners, and then putin will say, and how about avoiding? a clash, and biden will turn his back and say, no, i will not talk about this, which means that they are not at all unrealistic, and therefore, if such a meeting takes place, then i am sure that they will prepare some kind of agenda that will include central issues in russian-american relations and from my point of view the most central issue. this is how to avoid a direct military clash between the binuclear powers. and this is encouraging that there is such readiness in washington and, of course, assistants are now speaking in moscow president putin about the fact that such a meeting has not yet

been scheduled, but they clearly make it clear that it is not ruled out, unless, of course, there are appropriate conditions for this, and i am sure of the appropriate agenda, and dmitry well , so we share. the agenda of a hypothetical possible meeting between putin and biden, and into two components, the first component is the prevention of a third world war by preventing a direct military clash between russia and nato from here, really. everything is clear. and russia the united states agrees with that such a collision is not unacceptable. since it is very likely to lead to the use of nuclear weapons against each other, and there can be no winner in a nuclear war, therefore, it should not be started in any case, but it is impossible, and this is one part of the agenda, but at the same time russia constantly talks about that in

order to prevent this most direct military clash, the united states must change its policy towards ukraine that the united states itself creates the prerequisites for this direct military confrontation. increasing the supply of weapons to the kiev regime, and moreover, supplying more and more advanced and heavy weapons. and so i began by saying that today a regular meeting of the rammstein group is taking place in brussels, and it has already been announced that the collective west, the united states and nato, are moving to a new stage of escalation in terms of prevention in part, and the supply of weapons to ukraine and we are already talking about air and missile defense systems on sams, and until recently the west and the united states ruled out the possibility of supplying such

systems. now this decision has already been made by joe biden, and authorized the supply of eight such systems to e, ukraine and, according to john kirby, the official representative of the national security council, and the party, the first two e, of these systems will be at the disposal of the kiev regime already in a few. uh, soon and in this way. here we see, uh, really climbing the escalation ladder, because we started with javelins. and now we are talking about the supply of these enough advanced systems. which is already the next step after e, rszo highmars, while ukraine is asking for e, long-range missiles. and these cms with a flight range of up to 300, even over uh, 300 km. and the same john kirby said that he could

not exclude the possibility of deliveries of such missiles, that everything was possible. and at the same time, russia is already saying in plain text that the provision of these long-range missiles will be the crossing of the last red line. after which, with great clarity, a direct military clash between russia and the united states, in your opinion in this context. will the united states refrain from providing these systems and what to do about the fact that the united states, on the one hand, talks about the importance of preventing a third world war, but on the other hand, does not want to refuse or at least reduce the supply of weapons to ukraine and. they even reach a new level with the provision of these here, uh, systems, these are also rszo systems. and dmitry, but you pose the central question,

which is difficult to answer e. well, if possible, then to express a reliable answer, because again, as you yourself said, uh, some time ago the united states said that such systems of multiple rocket launchers, high-precision long -range systems that are capable of striking russian territory, that such systems will not be available to ukraine against being granted. now they are all, and more and more are being provided and the taboo has been lifted quite recently, the united states said that they would not supply ukraine with modern means against air defense, because on the one hand it is, of course, defense, but on the other hand. if you get such systems, you can e work out. you have a sense of security and that it’s easier for you and if you want

to strike more safely at the territory of opponents, including the territories of russia itself, and this taboo has now been lifted and not only by the united states, but also by other nato allies, including germany, which is quite recent. uh, she said that she would not want to go so far in the supply of weapons to ukraine, and again, why the united do the states do it? there's definitely a mixture of politics and politicking in the sense that the united states looks at the conflict in ukraine looks at russian actions, how russia is not ready to retreat, how russia uh passes uh, new laws that make donetsk luhansk and two other regions uh, an integral part of russia . looks at how russia responds very seriously. uh, what ukraine did with the crimean bridge

and, uh, the united states has a desire to demonstrate that uukraine is military you won’t win in ways, and well, show them to the ukrainians, uh, so that they don’t lose, as it were, the fighting spirit that america is with them is politics. this may be bad policy. it may be the wrong policy, but it's a serious policy. well, then there is the politicking, again on the eve of the midterm elections, of a very administration, i don’t want to give the impression that they are afraid of russia, that they are afraid of putin, that they are starting to retreat, and uh, we must give president zelensky his due, and he managed to put himself almost like world figure, when he, in my opinion, is just brazenly enough, but explains to world leaders what they should

do to him and how they are wrong if they do not immediately satisfy his ever-growing demands. and this is an interesting thing. you hear in washington talking to officials with officials that, in general, this is the behavior. uh, zelensky is very reminiscent of saakashvili's behavior in 2008 . although leave stirs, so in fact, uh, he didn’t go far in his rhetoric, but biting the hand of the giver, attacking those who provide him with weapons and help. but they say that in general, and zelensky apparently does not understand something in the dynamics, and no one wants to talk about american relations with ukraine, but publicly. well, there are some leaks, like that of the american intelligence services. or not aware of plans to assassinate daria dugin, but nonetheless. here's

to publicly besiege zelensky for now. at least, on the eve of the midterm elections, they do not want to. how long will it last. i don't know, but it seems to me that you and i agree to amend me if this is not the case in one basic thing, what is u important and commendable, how does one do? president biden. he says that the conflict is a military conflict between nuclear powers is unacceptable, but to say this is one thing, and to avoid steps that could lead to such a confrontation is another and, of course, the escalation of american assistance to ukraine is actually the escalation of american participation in the conflict on the side of ukraine, this pushes naval washington is closer to the possibility of some kind of confrontation and i. about tactical nuclear weapons, of course, it is very dangerous to use them and deliberately avoided in moscow

conversations on this topic public conversations on this topic, but on the other hand. well, in general, this is also a weapon and the united states themselves were going to use it at one time, when nato had superiority in this area, and russia, on the contrary, had superiority in conventional weapons. and now, in washington, it proceeds from the fact that there is such a colossal difference between any nuclear weapon, including tactical and naomi modern weapon systems, more and more destructive systems, that somehow these any modern conventional non-nuclear systems apply and another country. all the same, e will not take this tactical nuclear path. i don't know what you think. and dmitry, but it seems to me that, of course, there is a serious line between the most destructive

conventional and even tactical nuclear weapons, but if i were in the place of the biden administration, i would not rely on the fact that this line can always be maintained if you continue to attack the other side, most modern most destructive weapons. and especially if it will be applied. as ukraine is going to use against civilian objects, what do you think dmitry, i completely agree with you and it seems to me a mistake to assume that the use of nuclear weapons is not permissible under any circumstances and that there is this gulf between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons, the american experts themselves and the us military for the past ten and even over 10 years has been constantly talking about blurring the lines. between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons and that in the conditions of modern

technologies, rather than nuclear weapons, acquire strategic properties. that is, they can solve such problems that have traditionally been solved only with the use of nuclear e-weapons. and let’s get down the current discourse, it’s absolutely artificial and far -fetched about russia’s alleged readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, it just proves this erasure, because look what the american generals are talking about mainly, retirees and military experts, what they say that the united states has such non-nuclear capabilities outside nuclear e, in it the nuclear field, which can destroy, and russian launchers of the system of making, decisions, and so on, that is, in fact, inflict a disarming non-nuclear strike on and and reduce

the russian potential for strategic nuclear deterrence to a minimum, if not to zero, this is being said today in the american discussion, which just proves the artificiality. this is the watershed between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons, moreover, dmitry. what you are talking about proves that it is very difficult for us reach an agreement. i mean the united states of russia and , uh, the united states. even on such a seemingly obvious and vital issue as for a conflict, as the prevention of a direct military clash, because we understand even the threat of escalation in different ways, because the dialogue between russia and the united states resembles a conversation of a deaf person in the last few weeks, when russia directly text says that the threat lies precisely in a direct military clash between russia and nato as a result. american arms supplies to ukraine, which are acquiring an increasingly large-scale and

more and more sophisticated character. while the united states is talking about russia's alleged readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, the absolute thing is what is called in english miss match yes, that is, really a conversation between the deaf and the blind. and even in this matter there is de-conflict. it is very difficult for us to agree with each other, but it is even more difficult for us to agree on content not on deconfluxing. therefore, how to properly regulate the ukrainian a crisis. and what should be the security system in europe and in eastern europe in particular, and yesterday e was held online, and the extraordinary g-7 summit and the statement that was published as a result of this themselves create the impression of what? there is no prospect of a deal at all based on the statement that was

released, because i noticed. you said very important things. i want to answer this. uh. it seems to me that you are absolutely are right. they say how difficult it is to agree on the content of our agreements. and uh about how to prevent conflicts, but i would like to end our conversation with one provocative thought at the root of our problems is that contrary to uh, if you want, uh wisdom recognized in the west, that humanity is getting smarter with age and more democratic. generally. the history of our civilization shows that technological capabilities are growing faster than our capabilities by these technological capabilities of intelligent manage and keep them under control. and that's when we look at uh, the cuban missile crisis. in

general, at the end of the day it was e between two leaders between nikita and khrushchev and john f. kennedy who managed, if you want to humble your pride and make some reasonable concessions to the other and, in general, save humanity from serious misfortune . and today we have fewer and fewer such mechanisms left, and, uh, the more military capabilities we have, the more in the west it is in the west, and not in russia, but the desire is growing not just to achieve specific goals, such as some kind of agreement on ukraine, but to create your own new world order. and so, when i look at how the united nations is being treated, which are from the conflict resolution mechanism. it turns into a mechanism for punishing russia, china, pressure on all those who disagree, then i begin to

worry very much and it seems to me that this is our fundamental problem. it's like creating such a world order, such international organizations that, in general, would not rely on individual wisdom each of us, oh, which would be created by sustainable and they are afraid to say democratic mechanisms for controlling international situations. dmitry, i completely agree with you, and about the cuban crisis. i just want to emphasize that, uh, john fitzgerald kennedy and nikita khrushchev uryu- were able to resolve this crisis, because they agreed not only to prevent a military attack on each other, but they agreed on the rules of confrontation. they agreed on more fundamental things that laid the basis for the cold war over the next

decades and after the cuban crisis, new crises similar to the cuban or two berlin crises did not arise between the soviet union and the united states precisely because they agreed on issues of world order. how right you are, but you also noted how today the countries of the seven understand fair peace in ukraine does not create any prerequisites for such an agreement. it's just that i want us and the audience to see exactly how strangely big the g7s today understand a just peace in ukraine, as stated in yesterday's g7 summit declaration . it should include the following elements of compliance with the provisions of the un charter on, protecting territorial integrity and sovereignty preserving ukraine's ability

to defend itself in the future ensuring the restoration and reconstruction of ukraine, including the search for opportunities to do this, at the expense of funds received from russia , bringing russia to justice for crimes committed during the war. well, today, president putin's foreign policy aide, yuri ushakov, said, never say never. this is it about zelensky's position to completely abandon negotiations. uh, with uh vladimir putin i would really like to hope that we can apply exactly the same principle to the position, a, which is formulated in the decisions. eh, the big seven themselves and, uh, what is it? this understanding of justice peace is the requesting position of the official rhetorical requesting position, which can be corrected in the process, because if this is the case, then we can really agree on the

settlement of this conflict and the prevention of a direct military clash between russia and nato . if this position, what is called cast in granite and not an inch cannot be adjusted, then, unfortunately, i don’t see the prerequisites for any serious substantive agreement and for russia an agreement on just before the conflict in isolation from solving fundamental issues of security and the european international order today does not make much sense dmitry thank you very much. for this interesting conversation, the big game will return. a few moments a new series is borne, my favorite question is millions of products at

discounted prices every day. open additional discounts. open the ozonta in the nitrogen app. ormatex anatomical mattress with a 55% discount care from pyaterochka discounts for you during the jubilee 64.90. i will have time to issue a tinkoff black card with a design famous picture until october 16 and get

free service forever tinkoff he’s the only one the energy of gigabytes launches the internet and sets in motion everything that the subscriber loves once every three months we double gigabytes in tariffs so that all subscribers of the country receive more benefits forever everyone is given for those who connected and for those who have been with us for a long time connect tele2 and get double gigabytes, forever double gigabytes every 3 months tele2 other rules sovcombank in 3 minutes two clicks on one a call to arrange a deposit at eight and five percent per annum sovcombank closer to people. negative emotions anxiety strong feelings all this can be stressful for the heart, regular intake of cardiognil helps to take care of his

health cardiomagnyl heart health under control swear that you will be faithful and will not give life to one another there is no salvation. time of anger, watch in the un online cinema post bank guarantees 10% income in each grocery store with an all-terrain vehicle card, i explain intelligibly, pay everywhere here, yes, and get income. get a free card everywhere income and get a 10% cashback in any grocery postal bank. birthday of three, the vtb team will offer a solution. it seems to me to get 1,000 rubles for free. cashback 2% for everything you are used to and payment for lcd infinity. show your free vtb card right now. switch to

vtb and everything will work out for each other. only one capsule a day is maximum for your microflora, which means that for immunity, the halva card is surprised by guarding free installments for 10 months, halva, as before, weighs nothing to you. everything is also 0% on installments and fees. for maintenance, too, there is no hulk weightless installment plan with a weighty advantage. in any incomprehensible situation write to the robot to enroll children in a circle or section online is easier than it seems, public services the national digital economy project is trying to guess whether you will be approved for a loan. a comparison will help you know for sure. check your credit score. try the application and find out which bank will approve the loan on the best terms on compare if loan, then compare choose

better. today, speaking at the forum of the russian energy week, vladimir putin said that russia will not act to its own detriment and substitute energy resources for those countries that are fighting against russia, this is the price ceiling for russian oil, this applies to the united states of the g7 countries who promote this idea and the european union, which , as it were, built the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthis ceiling into the latest package of anti-russian sanctions by banning european companies from servicing those tankers that transfer russian oil to a third country. and here i want very importantly. it seems to me that the moment, but to stop and emphasize it, and now, based on the words of vladimir putin, russia will thus not substitute these countries that will

join the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe ceiling. not only oil, the united states has already, but introduced an imbargo. russian oil imports are euro- for the european union, this embargo will come into force on december 5 this year, but russia will not put gas there yet. that is, if the european union does move to this idea, or rather implement this idea of ​​a price ceiling, then russia can completely cut off the supply of russian gas to the european union. this is what follows from today's words of vladimir putin, but at the same time, vladimir putin said that if the european union behaves decently and does not introduce any price ceilings, otherwise russia will be ready to supply to the european union, and in that including increasing the supply of its production. including

will be ready to use the preserved branch, and gas pipeline nord stream-2, and maybe they will repair it, and er, gas pipelines are blown up and thereby increase. e-e deliveries of russian gas to the european union, listen to repair gas pipelines that run along the bottom of the baltic sea and undermined, of course, it is possible, but this will only make sense if they continue to be economically justified exploitation. and, of course, when ensuring the safety of routes , this is a paramount condition, if we and the europeans come to a common decision to supply gas, along the surviving branches. she is there one branch of nord stream 2. apparently, russia survived to the beginning. these deliveries are ready for the ball, as they say, on the side of the european union they want. let them all just open the taps, and we repeat once again we do

not restrict anyone in anything, including we are ready to supply additional volume in the autumn-winter period vladimir dmitrievich it seems to me that this is a very important signal and the ball is really on the side of the european union in that number on the issue of the price ceiling. you agree, but e, began by saying that e in his speech president uh made another one. it seems to me a related statement, noting that until at least 2025, russia plans to keep oil production at a stable level. that is, it means that we operate within the framework. uh, custody plus agreements, and we're committed to those agreements and we're keeping them. uh, such a long-term strategy. this is, firstly, secondly, uh, despite the fact that, indeed, from december 5, eu sanctions come into effect, which can limit oil supplies to uh europe and at the same time

at the same time, uh, it is planned to introduce a certain price ceiling, however, russia does not stop this either. she, uh, continues to maintain stable production, realizing that there are other markets for sales. that is, it does not affect the strategy, so to speak, so it seems to me that here it is necessary to consider this as a whole, because, uh , for us today, uh, it is more important to maintain our relationship. here in a wide e circle e of our partners in the oil market, a and e, it is no coincidence that before the energy week there was a visit of the president united arab emirates moscow it seems to me that this is a very important landmark decision. moreover , the united arab emirates is not only an oil country, but also a gas country, and quite recently, the europeans entered into certain gas negotiations with them, if i'm not mistaken, in my opinion, the germans or talk about gas supplies, but that less than a market. it's very thin and

, uh, everybody's interested in securing a long-term investment. it seems to me that today the leadership of the european union and individual european countries, maybe they understand, but publicly, they clearly ignore the fact that in order to ensure the entire supply of energy resources in e. to one country or another. well, they need investments to pay off, you can't just take a stick to stick in the desert. and there, it means that a bit will begin to beat a fountain of oil, as once at the dawn of the oil era there in the united states in america, as they say, for the first time, the first opened the first well, this cannot be today, a high-tech industry that requires investment, and they should pay off. you can't make a contract about what you're selling today, and tomorrow you'll be denied it, so for today, these are the statements that were made by the president. they are very revealing then plan that really. e,

if e adhere to all agreements, then these ceilings do not fit into them at all, because they break the whole market. not only do they break the entire market. they are absurd in themselves. uh, well, they also add discord to this, so to speak, in the ranks of people who, in general, today they work for one mission and, in fact, these words, when meeting with the president, the president of the united arab emirates, that e russia, like other members, again the pluses come from the fact that would stabilize the market, and not someone punish. i think they are very important. and this emphasizes emphasizes the country's strategy. well idea with this price ceiling. in principle, it has already become very loose, and it is unlikely that it can be implemented, as it was conceived, by the united states, because today deputy secretary of the treasury of the united states will. and adygeima said that the united

states would not impose secondary sanctions against those countries that would import russian oil at a price higher than the ceiling that is supposed to be. e that the countries of the big seven will agree, that is, you understand, and what then is the point of china, india and turkey will import russian oil, as they imported at a market price, the united states, the european union, if they introduce this ceiling, they will themselves will be punished. they just won't, uh, buy russian oil. uh, they will buy more expensive oil from other suppliers. and other countries will simply import russian oil , the question arises. and who is himself? eh? who is punishing whom? yes, and who is isolating whom? in this case, the united states, the european union, is simply isolating itself from the world market. yes, this e this idea, and putin's statement about russia's readiness to increase, e,

gas supplies to the european union. it seems to me more important and because by doing so, russia shows that it has historically been the basis for the european. economic industrial development for european prosperity, and it is ready to continue to play this role, that if the united states is driving europe into pre-industrialization and poverty, then russia is historically the basis for the economic development of european countries , and if european countries change their policies and normalize energy relations with russia, then russia will also be ready to return to this traditional, but historical role. do you agree nikolai viktorovich well, lately. i want to say we have learned a lot. here, as a soviet schoolboy, foreign voices hmm taught me that democracy, multiportion, respect for

property, and other things that are now placed like smoke, this is the basis for the well-being of western society. and now the leaders of the western countries of the european union directly speak about our well-being. it turns out that it was based on inexpensive soviet resources. that would be told. you us it in eighty-fifth year, maybe we understood something differently, no, i started talking about it when they refused or when they were forced to do this, so when hmm you say that russia is sending the ball to the european union, they say. oh well, the problem is that maybe there is no player on the other side and the ball. so you know, it is slowly rolling into the gates of the european union, because they are really now leading this ceiling. uh valuable, they lead the united states does not lead will not do secondary sanctions. it will be another coffin. i beg your pardon carnation, of course, uh european economy. there is no such thing as

awareness today, but there is no possibility of realizing that it is necessary to change one's policy, but it seems to me that in many respects the statement that the president makes is aimed, among other things, at destroying certain harmful stereotypes. in which they are created or are trying to create in the information sphere, because in the west many people say and write that it was russia that allegedly blew up these unfortunate gas pipelines. well, when putin says that we have another branch. come on, we'll follow it to you send. well, of course, they will continue to invent all these fables, but all this, of course, makes their work difficult, so they sent the ball. it seems to me in a weak hope that someone, the last of the mohicans of the european players, the politics of the economy, will be able to process this ball and somehow send it back. well , it seems to me that the audience here and the player who can play with this sword is the population of the countries of the european union, because here, with what intensity and on what scale they now take to the streets every day, in fact, the process

e protests in major european cities demanding just to lift anti-russian sanctions to normalize energy relations with russia here they can it seems to me that this ball will not be accepted by the elite. not not ursula fondlyaina, but it is the population. and today, vladimir putin made a very interesting statement at the same forum. it seems to me that a strong initiative was proposed that a new hub, as well as on energy relations in europe and on the supply of energy resources. and not only russian, in general. uh, very many, including including azerbaijani, for example, energy resources. u will become the european union, turkey listen as for the russian?