we didn't have any practice. these are not fights. it's sweat from killing. she gives birth during the purity of the fetal heartbeat can lead to severe and even fatal to temporarily stop labor . what kind of people are you, aunt masha, do we just finally have a doctor. let's dance together again ice age. on saturday, the first language does not turn.

if someone knows the obstacles, davi peter catherine let him speak now or be silent forever. ivan stop. i love you. always loved from the first day i saw it. and when you're on

hands? i didn't know how much i love you. it was necessary to live a life to understand how much. i don't want to lose you. the will of the dead peter is an empty sound for them, they only hear the ringing ringing in this they will kill you. ivan, i'm honored to be with the former coffin. divulge the empress of all-russian catherine vivat purely seam already everything

happened is silent. if you want to live, be silent, no more. i know what peter said before he died. he said.

so that you pass the salvific one to the temple that is building. long live mother empress

let's go faster. they told you the emperor pardoned all of you scoundrels. killers courage without touching no one knows whether you killed or not. i know he knows. here is my place.

forgive me. with what painfully longed for stolen is a way out. got i deserve it too. how can you not? it's scary to lose everything. weak soul hurts and you do not close

your soul, your soul is your man. right i feel alive. easier thank you know sitting, you can't do much good here.

starshov i am not your enemy. not everyone likes what happened and there are many of us. we will pay. pay a lot if you reveal the secret of the word i have already said. think, think,

you will have everything. yes, ivan, they won't leave you alone. i have a temple it remains a little wall to part. but where did fyodor build when it's out, as the scripture says? don't you know that you are a temple? and the spirit of god lives on you.

good evening, the big game is on the air today, vladimir putin began a diplomatic marathon in astana, where three summits are held at once, a meeting on interaction and confidence-building measures in asia , the commonwealth of independent states and the russia central asia format, bilateral meetings of vladimir putin with turkish president erdogan, palestinian leader mahmoud abbas sheikh sheikh, tomimo bel-hamad altani of qatar, president aliyev of azerbaijan, trilateral negotiations with the presidents of kyrgyzstan and tajikistan took place. and, of course, vladimir putin spoke at the plenary session of the cfm. in particular, here is what the russian president said about the role of asia in the world and the role of russia listen today's meeting is taking place against the backdrop of major changes in global politics and the economy. the world is getting truly multipolar and very noticeable

if they play a key role in this asia where new centers of power will shout. the countries of the asian region are the locomotive of world economic growth. here , integration associations such as the shanghai cooperation organization, the association of southeast asian nations, the eurasian and eurasian economic union , actively participate in all these processes, and russia actively participates with good results. we stand for the development and prosperity of asia and the creation of a wide open space, mutually beneficial trade and investment cooperation for the expansion and deepening of cooperation ties in various sectors of the economy. indeed, asia is the economic and geopolitical patients of the world. this is a region where new centers

of power are growing most dynamically, where there is no single hegemon, where there is no such a tough bloc approach and, accordingly , a split, as we are seeing in europe, and at the same time, right before our eyes, the svp format, which includes today 28 full members. plus, there are observers , so this format is becoming an important element of this flexible asian architecture. today it was decided to transform the meeting into an international organization, that is, perhaps the most representative asian organization appears, in which there is no united states of america as a full member, but there is china russia india pakistan iran turkey egypt countries of southeast asia and central asia ivan alekseevich, this is what such a creation of such a large asian organization means. genet the asian osce, since there is no united states there, there is no japan as full-fledged members,

but there are a lot of those countries that share, in principle, common approaches to the world order with russia and china. is it now possible to consider this structure as an institutional support of greater eurasia, this forum was usually called a forum, it has existed for quite a long time, and it is noteworthy that kazakhstan was the initiator of the creation, then several times the chairmanship was replaced by the chairmanship in china tajikistan and e. this forum was an institution . well, a little on the second on the sidelines, on the one hand it was clear that in form. this is something unique, because it is the largest association in eurasia, of course, the most numerous, which includes the countries of both the post-soviet space and the near one. southeast asia, yes, that is, it was, well, definitely

the widest organization in this was its undeniably uniqueness, but uh was incomprehensible. what is this unique form to apply to? what content to fill her e her, because after all, what to hide, uh, countries from the depths of eurasia raced into globalization, sometimes even pushing their elbows. who will run faster to this globalization, who will better globalize and connect themselves with the outside e with the outside world and external players. they even played with it a little. right now, in the new conditions, it becomes clear why this unique form is such a wide membership, how to fill it. this is a dialogue between the connections within eurasia is becoming more important than outside, this does not mean that there will be no connection outside. we will stay. uh, very well integrated into the outside world.

maybe ties with the west will decrease, but ties with the rest of the world will increase, and here is the filling of this unique broad form with content. as intensive communication as possible is very, very important, but i'm sure that smd or now the asian confidence building engagement organization will not replace the sco, it will not replace the eurasian economic one. uh, union, and other institutions as well. it seems to me that it will be, well, to some extent, you can probably say an analogue, uh obse uh in asia but only much better than bsc uh because that organization is in crisis right now. she failed. actually with that role and effective platforms for dialogue and the main unification of europe is the creation. europe but i fully agree with your thesis of the creation of this broad asian eurasian organization. this is

just proof that a large eurasia is being formed before our eyes as a unit, as a geopolitical and geo-economic unit, because the connections within are becoming, well, no less important, at least than the outward links, and therefore just the existing formats are no longer enough, because there, well, let's say. the same turkey or egypt, they are not full members. the sco, for example, yes, but now an organization is emerging that will stimulate precisely within the eurasian ties between east asia and middle east asia , and this is indeed very correct. this is completely in line with the russian idea of ​​​​forming a greater eurasia. even today, vladimir putin, in the same speech, spoke about the need to create the new world economic order is a more just world economic order and o necessary. those restrictions on the privileges of the countries of the golden billion, listen how do many of our partners in asia believe that it is required to launch?

revision of the principles of operation of the global financial system, which for decades allowed the self-proclaimed so-called golden billion, which closed all the flows of capital and technology to itself, to a large extent, live at someone else's expense. as a first step. we see a more active use of national currencies in mutual settlements, such measures would undoubtedly contribute to strengthening the financial sovereignty of our states, the development of domestic capital markets, and the deepening of regional economic integration. yuri vladimirovich, don't you think that the chairman of the council could sign his name under every word from this part of the speech of the russian president. or maybe even borrow something in his speech at the 20th congress of the chinese communist the party that opens on sunday is absolutely

our interests. uh, in that respect, they match, well , 120%, because, uh, china is like an economy that is now advancing, which is becoming the largest in the world, of course. china is interested in having fair rules, not the ones that are written in washington. e washington consensus. uh, normal uh, rules between buyers and sellers between those who transport these uh goods, of course they are uh interested, and they will talk about it and in fact, these ideas also underlie the chinese ideas about the future world, uh, the community of the common destiny of mankind, therefore they support brix, therefore they put forward the concept of uh, the yellow path of the absolute absolute uh word for word

hieroglyphs, hieroglyph. eh, letter for letter of our position and in this it absolutely coincides with hers. er, of course they are wrong. many american observers when they say that the russian-chinese partnership is a marriage of convenience, because this is not a marriage of convenience, but simply an objective coincidence and interests and approaches to the world order, both geopolitical and economic. well, i have already said that vladimir putin had a number of bilateral meetings today. one of the most important was the meeting with turkish president taip recep tayyip erdogan, and during this meeting, vladimir putin again, but emphasized the idea that he expressed the day before at the energy week forum, namely, the creation of a new hub for turning turkey into the main hub e of gas supplies, e to europe of russian gas e azeri gas, in general gas from the east. e to europe, and what

is noteworthy today, vladimir putin said that this would allow not only to ensure the stability and reliability of these supplies, but also to resolve the issue of pricing, that the russian -turkish gas partnership would make this pricing more fair, and, among other things, reduce the price of gas, putin stressed that now the price of gas is very high. but if e russia turkey will create such a hub, then the price will become e more fair leonid markovich what is meant here? well, let's think, firstly, the history of gas contracts is already very simple, when we say our gas came 40 years ago. by the way, he was called not soviet neurosian, so we were offered these graningent contracts, we accepted them, although they did not reflect our construction and mining costs. we seem to have integrated into

the system that would be convenient for the consumer, so in general, most likely, we were not paid extra. yep, but it's in the past. now i'm talking as well current times, but market liberalization and withdrawal to hubs has been associated. uh, with chris around 2008, it turned out to be a little expensive there at times, there was almost inertia in contracts, and due to hybrid contracts. this problem is solved mom. but still, now it turns out that gas is determined in the hubs and gas is not produced or it is passing by, passing by, here. uh, for now, as soon as the azerbaijani turkmen, gas- eastern eastern mediterranean potential of egy appeared. our and so on the idea appears reasonable to price on gas is among the circle of suppliers. well, i don't know what 's actually worked out there, but it's quite a healthy day. this, of course, is a hub, this is spotting prices, because long-term contracts under

which we still supply this in some places, taking into account oil. due to the fact that there is an oil component, these prices are much lower under contracts than spot prices, but ensuring high liquidity and a large volume of gas in the future. they could, or could, play, uh, a stabilizing role in the world. well, vladimir putin and recepta and erdogan said about the gas. we talked about other aspects of cooperation between the two countries. and now a few words about what they did not talk about, according to the press secretary of the russian president dmitry peskov. it was they who did not talk about the possibility of a russian western deal. at the russian western deal on the settlement of the ukrainian conflict the fact is that uh, recently, uh, the idea of ​​such a deal has been actively discussed and the turkish media even wrote that turkey is proposing a five-party format for the settlement

of this conflict russia usa great britain france germany large countries. yes, in such a classical spirit in a great-power spirit, to agree on a settlement, and , by the way, viktor orban spoke about the corresponding conflict, who said that only a russian-american agreement could put an end to this conflict, and the intensification of these conversations in recent days was absolutely not accidentally, because we are witnessing an ongoing escalation of the conflict. yes, and when ukraine commits an increasing number of terrorist attacks, moreover, on strategic objects, and russia responds with massive missile strikes. this is an escalation and more escalation risks are being created, russia the west understands this escalation in different ways russia talks about what it considers. the west is already the actual us and nato the actual party to the conflict and talks about the risks , uh, transitions to a direct military clash between russia nato to the united states and nato talk about the

risk of russia using tactical nuclear weapons, but in any case, here is the question of further escalation. it's just hanging in the air therefore, of course, they started talking about the necessity and expediency of the corresponding deal. but uh, until apparently. the west is not ready for this deal, it has become. clear. uh, after the interview. uh, joe biden on cnn, when he said that the only issue he was willing to talk to putin about was the issue of u.s. citizens being imprisoned in russian prisons, he didn't really rule out the possibility. uh, the very meeting with putin at the g20 summit in bali called putin a rational player. but, and last night last night even more unequivocal about the us attitude towards the russian-american deal was expressed by the official representative of the state department netprice, listen we have made it clear that the

us government does not take on the role of negotiating on behalf of any other country, which also applies to ukraine if there is an opportunity for dialogue and diplomacy, to end the current war, it will ultimately have to be used by russia and ukraine, we do not intend to make decisions for ukraine alexander germanovich. here. eh, you don't it seems that the unwillingness of the united states to such an agreement for such a deal is primarily due, because for them to make this deal means recognizing russia as an equal great power and, accordingly, putting an end to any and all claims of the united states to global hegemony . that is, for them it is a question of their status , their position in the international system, they agree. i'm totally that this is really some kind of end pak with americano that is. american, which we

we observe and at the same time a certain, but undermining in the event that such is completely impossible. in my opinion, for the states, the scenario took place under the influence of the democratic party. let me remind you that, after all, there is, well, with the exception of rare votes, some kind of usikabr, who suddenly decided to leave the democratic party for the viniv. actually their associates in that few they are pushing the world. well, if sums up on the border of existence to the nuclear crisis and so on, but she was so to speak. hardly so to say, not drooping, but doused with smoothies, and so to speak, literally, so to speak, and did not receive any support from his, so to speak, former co- religionists. but, if you pay attention again to very hard matches, if only because the bolt itself, let's say the now former secretary of state, but these are really the verge of a foul, but colleagues agree that when so high, and does not happen in the past, but high he and high manifestations, so to speak in the forest. and so to speak, declares unexpected that putin vladimirovich is a military target yeah, that is the president another country as a military target, in fact, at least he will set himself. to a step above and than a below

it is the usa above russia below the usa on this occasion. and of course, we can trace a similar stomach in the behavior of the united states. and at least on the example of christine kaul, the recently appointed commander-in-chief, so to speak, of the us forces and, by definition, so to speak, nato is at least the first violin in europe, which actually buried ice silence b document at the time of the presentation of his office. more precisely, so to speak published document. so to speak type blinter. a e stated that he does not exclude any scenarios, but the exclusion of any scenarios. it has already been expressed in the fact that a has been transferred. i would say, and some kind of relation, and according to def 2 general readiness, and the american troops for the escalation of the conflict, which were not transmitted to us , came from enough, as it were, confidential sources of this kind of message were not transmitted, but the general readiness of the caribbean crisis, then there is, based on this, it is clear that the united states is flexing its muscles categorically does not want any dsk because

i said loudly already on the verge of a foul and clearly. why is she on the verge of a foul, because after that there will be a collapse of the position in europe and uh, in fact, i would say that he u asked the jenstutenber here. even if it’s not an american who said that, actually , so to speak, but the victory of russia in ukraine will mean categorical, well, not a rout and said a loss. and nato is the north of the classic alliance - this is the united states, literally a sign of identity, respectively, leaving, so to speak, akila who missed care. as they say, the old wolf, which is no longer needed from now on, and here it’s just clear. why is russia now taking such a wonderful step to support the creation, but i call it the eurasian un in fact, which, by definition, is called upon to command the eurasian continent, and the states within their own concept of creation. this anglosphere, together with boris johnson and tin with him, if you take great britain, turns out to be somewhere on the backs. let in the pacific ocean. they they want to transport the entire ocean, but in the backyards, that is, again, the middle earth returns.

to the loi of all the most popular saxons, the romans, and the states again turn out to be sea changes that are gravitating around somewhere, so the condition that we are in the center and thank god here, the united states it seems to me to drive myself into a very difficult trap now and are faced with a dilemma to get out, from which it is extremely difficult, because on the one hand, a compromise with russia is unacceptable for them, which will mean for them the loss of recognition status the multipolarity of the world was recognized by russia as an equal great power, but on the other hand. they want to avoid a third world war. pay attention and the biden administration constantly says that we are not a party to the conflict. we will not go to war with russia today after the nato ministerial meeting at the level of defense ministers, jens stoltenberg also made it very clear that the fifth article applies only to our members. e it does not apply to nato members to ukraine, they will to help ukraine, but in no case do they want to fight their teeth. but is it possible to keep this

approach indefinitely? i'm not sure because we've already moved very far in the escalation spiral. the united states started with javelins. now they are already supplying anti-aircraft missile defense systems to sans well, plus rso hummers. the next step along the path of this step. uh, escalation spirals. this is already providing long-range missiles. russia says this is the very last line after which everything is, uh, direct military conflict between russia and nata third world war. and here comes the dilemma, what is more important is the survival of oneself, yes, but the survival of just the united states and the rest of the world, or the status of the united states as the only superpower and world leader or world hegemon, it doesn’t matter, this and this is an extremely difficult dilemma and this is a much more difficult situation . what

was the caribbean crisis, many people compare the current situation with the caribbean crisis; now the situation is more complicated, because the caribbean crisis and the resolution of the caribbean crisis in no way did not change the status of the united states, the status of the soviet union and the general world order the world, as it was bipolar before the caribbean crisis, so it remained bipolar after the caribbean crisis, the united states and the soviet union did not remain such as superpowers after the resolution of the caribbean crisis, the settlement of this ukrainian crisis is fraught with changes in the structure of the world and a change in the status of the united states from being the sole superpower. on just one of the powers. and this is extremely important for them. ah, unwanted diseases. but do you agree that they cannot avoid this dilemma indefinitely. i would say dmitry believed that if you and i find ourselves in the logic that after a very good van dam officer of the russian general staff of the era. the empire, ah, which i say, that the

goglasax always fight by proxy, by definition, on the american hair, like a civilization, and always has three or four spare scenarios in order not to get into the first video at the moment really, but the states. you are absolutely right in my opinion. this is all on all counts forced to take some position, but it is actually a position. this is already the position of a participant in the conflict, and if they are not participants in the conflict, then they obviously lose their whole game, because they have rebuilt several scenarios, it seems, one of which ukraine is participating and breaking russia is participating in poland and helping ukraine to break russia as they thought ukraine poland is participating and western europe, again, and suddenly it turns out that europe, in principle, does not really want much, with the exception of a crazy macron. i apologize for this epithet separate, so to speak in a good way, well, in a way yes, as it were, a little bit specific, let's say so in a more polite diplomatic language. but, well, it’s approximately clear that europe will be

interested in you, but you won’t be in the states. moreover, europe feels betrayed due to the fact that now american liquefied gas comes at a price, let me remind you. it was just a dialogue between the offices of macron, and actually, but biden for some reason, and four times higher than the domestic american price in europe - this does not suit, and where is the wallet there, as they say, is the heart, therefore, well, one hundred percent the states will have to somehow define themselves, well, i really don’t want to, absolutely, the united states postpones all sorts of resolutions to this dilemma until later, but, inevitably, they will come to this choice. and god forbid that after all the choice was made not in favor of the third world war. we will now pause for a few moments and then we will talk about the american national security strategy. in the early morning of february 24, did you wake up in a different world? i stood where people died and i had no more questions.

film by alexandra frank westerners arrived and began to buy up the first shelling of donetsk when ukraine is an airport and they are for peace on our bones, a terrible picture when your child is helpless. here he lies, it seems that he is nearby, but he is not there. everyone, according to their ability, transfers money to the front, so we have chronicles. we considered the start of a special military operation. for us, this means the end of the war birthday.

even more benefits with the new ozon bank card, millions of products at discounted prices every day. open additional discounts. open the ozone card in the ozon app hyundai smart tv for 10.490 rubles. up to 50% discounts on children's toys and tents from the brand we play together everything for a fun game on wildberries

energy of gigabytes launches the internet every 3 months we double gigabytes in tariffs so that all subscribers of the country receive more benefits forever for everyone for those who connected and for those who who have been with us for a long time connect tele2 and get double gigabytes, forever doubling gigabytes every 3 months tele2 other rules in any incomprehensible situations. write to max's robot to issue a europrotocol online is easier than it seems, public services national digital economy project. what helps me strengthen immunity during the cold season new vitrum and monativ have even more selenium,

zinc and vitamin c in it the formula is enhanced with beta-glitches that help activate immunity everything for health in a unique complex of vitamins and minerals new with wind and nails, maximum for strong immunity in pyaterochka at a very low price. where was she stopping back? how to contain the joy when we keep prices low 1.500 items. behave profitably. appreciate the low prices milk station dairy for 59.99. i will have time to issue a tinkoff black card with the design of the famous painting before october 16 and get free service forever tinkoff he is one of a kind so we were all brought together.

this is beneficial to me. winx brought together the content of five popular video services in one subscription for only 499 rubles. per month. up to 50% off beauty & hygiene & toilet paper x for rub 159 even where the cold reigns, there is one who is stronger. you understood the international brand with years of expertise in the development of motor oils for harsh climates, where quality standards are paramount, de boylediamond of impeccable quality for flawless engine performance even under the most severe operating conditions.

buy cold tempered butter at 3 stalls. check your credit score and get approved for a loan at compare if credit, then compare a big game was on the air late last night in moscow united states biden administration presented the main policy document on american foreign policy is a strategy for national security. they are accepted every administration once every 4 years, of course, and it contains a lot of what is called lyrics. in this particular strategy. a lot of words. this is a 48 page document written in very small print, and there are a lot of traditional american stamps. e about the fact that the world, more than ever, needs american leadership. and that the international order is the set of rules of institutions that shaped the united states and is based on its leadership there is a lot of frank

lies. and i, we, too, will talk about this, but nevertheless. this document is very important. why because it reflects the philosophy of american foreign policy and how the united states actually sees the world? yes, right here in this document, in principle. now you can trust and e let's. eh, let's listen. how this paper characterizes the main challenges facing the united states of america now we face two strategic challenges. the first is the end of the period after the end of the cold war and the confrontation of the world's leading powers for choosing a further path of development is the second while this confrontation is ongoing, the attempt of people around the world to cope with the consequences of common transboundary problems of climate change, food insecurity. information disease terrorism lack of energy or inflation, the most serious strategic challenge comes from powers that combine authoritarian

rule with revisionist foreign policy russia and china are different challenges russia is an immediate threat, free and open international system. it recklessly tramples on the basic laws of the modern international order, as shown by its brutal war against ukraine, china, on the contrary, is the only competitor, at the same time seeking to change the international order and strengthening its economic diplomatic military. and the technological power to achieve this goal is a strategy that means that china represents the most serious geopolitical challenge for america. well, first of all, how do you compare. uh, what challenges russia and china pose for the united states and secondly, uh, don't you think it's very difficult to reconcile what the biden administration is trying to reconcile on one side. global struggle with russia and china this is

the central axial thought. uh, the whole strategy, on the other hand. this is multilateral cooperation to combat the climate change pandemic and so on, because, uh, the history of the pandemic has even shown that it does not work, but this is an attempt. somehow to divide, or something from the mouth of the enemies? uh, she's been around for a long time. as you know, in the united states there is, and i think there was a well-known expression that rent developed, that russia is rock. eh, that's not peo. ah, china is the opposite. so, how do you translate this? and an outcast, but well, roux is not quite an outcast. this is such an outrage, but not a rival. yes , not a rival, really. it can translate like that, and china is a rival, but it won’t look ugly. and here they are rent, seriously organization. here, then, she is she by this sorting. eh, i was busy coming up with

these epithets. but let's e so that in those terms in which americans try to speak. the concept of them is almost impossible, because what they are now saying is not an attempt to convey. what they think is an attempt to hide their own crisis. i mean, it's completely uh, different use of language, you sometimes, well , for example, there a few decades ago , it's obvious that americans used language in order to reinforce their message. yes, they had a message. they wanted to convey it. they thought they were the strongest there, something else now america is in the deepest crisis. both in terms of foreign policy and in terms of its internal model, and therefore all the words they are called upon. here all this is somehow polished, and therefore in their words, in their terms , in their concepts. it's not possible, it can be decrypted

. everything, well, in the following way, i propose to decrypt it to decode it. the united states used to say, we are for the common good, and in order for there to be a common good, wealth, economic development, order less war, and so on, we need to be in charge. yes sometimes we will beat someone with a club somewhere, but this is for the sake of the common good. for the common good. we must be in charge over the past decades , a lot of questions have accumulated. and why is something getting worse with wealth. and why do you beat with a club so much that nothing happens anywhere, blood is demanded, tears and suffering and there is no order and the united states now they have a position in fact, what are we in charge of, why can you invent yourself, why is europe well, because she's just afraid of everything. she can not act independently, so she agrees to america being the main there japan south

korea well, also not independent to be afraid of china, so according to the fact that america was. that is, for america. here it is, as if the chain had become different earlier for the sake of the common good. we must be in charge. and now we have to be the main come up. we we are ready to justify, in any way . that's what kind of lies will pass to that one, then we will give lies, and in some places. this quote was actually plagiarism. we still have in e. national security strategy. about 10 years ago, there was a phrase that a competition in the development model is beginning in the world. america kept telling us that there is no competition. there is only one development model. here you sounded that they finally recognized, and their model, it turns out, is not the best, so the united states is ready to weave anything in order to justify that they should be the main ones, and i want to draw your attention to that , how bad, and for this

whole here is the strategy that they published fits. the thesis that biden tried to make central, a confrontation between autocracies and democracies. so they did not dare to make this thesis absolutely central to the strategy. he appears in various places. they pull on different problems. it is pulled very badly very hard, but in the previous one everything. e. that's how long, well, 2 years of his administration, especially during the last six months. what do they say, it's autocracies against democracy, but when it's necessary, it's all about summarizing. well, it doesn't fit, because it's in no process. uh, the state of the world does not fit into a procrustean bed of opposition between democracy and autocracy. although this is an idea. indeed , it is present there from time to time, but not as central ones like this, yes, the main thing. but now the central elements there are that russia and china,

individually and even more so together, represent a challenge to the entire international order. china wants to replace it. the international order is something else. russia is simply allegedly destroying the international order, and therefore the american leadership. yes, who else but the united states will save, and the world order from these two authoritarian revisionist powers, as they call together with china, but the main challenge for the united states security describes the intention of the united states' policy towards the middle kingdom listen what kind of energy is the only competitor having? both the intention to change the international order and the growing economic diplomatic military and technological power, for this, beijing has the ambition to create an expanded sphere of influence in the endo- pacific region and become a leading world

power at the same time china plays a leading role in the world economy. it has a significant impact on global issues. in particular climate change and health care, we will act to address a range of issues from unreliable digital infrastructure and forced labor in supply chains to illegal fishing. we will involve beijing accountable for violating the genocide and crimes against humanity in xindian, the human rights violations in tibet and the destruction of hong kong's autonomy of freedoms despite intense competition, we will manage this competition responsibly. we will seek greater strategic stability through measures that reduce the risk of unintentional military escalation and improve crisis communications. provide mutual transparency and eventually engage beijing in a more formal effort to control weapons. we will always be ready to work with china where our interests coincide. this includes climate, pandemic threats , illegal drug control, the global

food crisis and macroeconomic issues. but yuri vladimirovich but china is interested in cooperating and working with the united states. for these climate issues. macroeconomic stability pandemic. with the united states stepping up containment of china while the united states talks about the need building up the american military presence in the pacific region, despite the fact that the united states in e. they are intensifying the technological and semiconductor chip war against china. they banned the supply of american e-chips in china using american technology and contributed 31 chinese technology companies. on the prohibited list with which it is not worthwhile, but to cooperate, china is ready to follow this logic, which at one time, hillary clinton, being secretary of state, very figuratively described how to go and chew gum and at the same time. i think that the chinese

are ready for tactical compromises, but will not make strategic concessions. uh, america and the main reason is that china stopped being afraid of america, you know, in 1979, when the pin went to america to start with, china was basically in ruins after the great leap forward cultural revolution and, uh, danciopin asked to go west. let us go. give us money. give us technology. china was accepted into the western family under generally terrible conditions, you will work for a penny do what we will tell you and don’t think about it, don’t think about it, turn up your nose and the chinese used this opportunity to get up they are the same pin to start, but

invented and worked out the system of socialism with chinese characteristics, which turned out to be so powerful so productive that china developed very rapidly. you know that some years gdp growth is more than 10%. and when the americans noticed this a little, recollecting it in hindsight. they offered china a new e, a new relationship. and it was during obama a's visit to beijing in 2009 that she was forced to live. yes, that is, america will be the big brother. china will be the younger brother. and these two brothers will control the world, the chinese have already refused. soon he came to power with children. he invented his concept of the relationship of the great powers, which provided,

in fact, the dumvirate of america and china, but on equal terms. he went to america with this idea. but naturally, the americans could not go. e even on being here on one level and uh, that was pretty serious. uh, beijing's mistake, yes, uh, i think it was the dolphins that were suggested by the american advisers, uh, there were enough of them in the world. e. well, here, this machine of socialism with chinese characteristics continued to work and er to the nineteenth congress of the communist party, which was 5 years ago. china approached with new amazing successes and even then it became clear that china would be exactly a socialist country, that socialism with chinese characteristics, the emphasis is on the first word on socialism and speed trump

started tariffs yes technological and so on and so on and the chinese continued. be afraid slowly. well, a little, but they were afraid, and now that all the sanctions are, in principle, being implemented against china, that's all. they have nothing to fear anymore. yeah, they have nothing to be afraid of, so now at the twentieth congress, which will open on march 16th, on october 16, some very , er, serious decisions will be made to further strengthen the socialist essence, the strengthening of the armed forces and the chinese can no longer go on the spot you see, they are this socialism with chinese characteristics. it works, it produces more and more new power. china this is not alice in wonderland,

who will eat e caramel, and will become small , and now what will we have in in the next 5 years until the next congress and for the foreseeable future, the golden billion will be opposed by steel and a half billion completely and the relationship between them antagonistic absolutely, but here, er, of course, what is this strategy. uh, i don't know if it was intentional or accidental right before uh, the twentieth congress of the chinese communist party and that china is proclaimed there as the main strategic adversary of the united states is, of course, a bad gift on the day of singing, but in this, but a barrel of tar. still, a spoonful of honey was found and it concerns taiwan , because the provision of this strategy on taiwan is completely contrary to what joe biden was talking about recently and it is said that the united

states is against any unilateral changes in the status quo from any side and do not support, uh, the independence of taiwan, yuri vladimirovich, well. i am did it pleasantly, but at the same time. just yesterday there was a visit. uh, in taiwan regular delegation of us congressmen in two party two senators two republicans. whether the chinese believe it or not, in fact the problem of taiwan is exaggerated by the world media, including us sinners, for china this is a problem, but this is not an existential problem, china can exist. uh, while maintaining the status quo, another 10 15 20, and he is striving for this china does not want war, but these words are words from this new resolution. do you know what? it seems to me that we are talking about

the fact that america is beginning to be afraid of china. this is very correct and you know if america existed before . ah, the wise monkey who sat on the yi and watched two tigers fight. yes, now the situation is very dangerous, when the two tigers russia and china are already approaching this monkey. yes , she is still sitting. there, on a tree or on top of a mountain, but the distance is already shrinking and the paws are about to reach out. well, what if china if this is a strategic adversary, then russia is the direct adversary in the united states let's hear how the us national security strategy describes its policy towards russia russia today poses a direct and persistent threat to international peace and stability together with our allies and partners, america intends to achieve a strategic failure russia in the war against ukraine although some aspects of our approach will depend on the course of the war in ukraine, the overall

strategy is already clear, first, the united states will continue to support ukraine in its struggle for freedom. we will help her restore the economy and integrate into the european union. second, the united states will defend every inch of nato territory and, together with allies and partners , will continue to strengthen the coalition to prevent russia from further harming european, democratic, and institutional security. thirdly, the united states will deter and, if necessary, respond to russian actions that threaten the core interests of the united states america expresses interest in maintaining strategic stability and developing more transparently. and with a verifiable arms control infrastructure to replace start-3 , the united states is also interested in restoring european security mechanisms that have fallen into disrepair due to russian actions. finally, the united states will maintain and develop a

pragmatic relationship with russia in areas where cooperation can be mutually beneficial. well pay attention to the opponent's enemy by strategic stability, and by some other questions with us. eh, they want to speak already a question to us. do we want to speak with the united states with their such a policy, but here is what alexander geranovich drew attention to, first of all, they support ukraine in its entry. in the european union, pronata words, in general this is not a national security strategy. secondly, there are no hints that russia will cease to be a great power, on the contrary, it is said that russia is a threat and poses dangers, and so on, but it is said. about what a want to russia failed in ukraine a strategic failure, but there is no word of defeat for russia that was used by us officials. uh, this uh this spring a and yes, in other places of the

strategy it is said that russia allegedly weakened relative to china and for some reason japan but uh, nevertheless, russia is positioned as a great power and everywhere in the text great power great power great great country. yes, russia , this is very remarkable. and the last thing i paid attention to. it is that all measures are very tactical right here and now in the context of the ukrainian ukrainian conflict. and what exactly is its long-term strategy? well, i would say dmitrievich said that here, of course, the entire document is permeated like people with such a hypocritical protestant spirit inherent in american documents. yes, and actually the whole concept of the combination of the united states because we understand that there is a certain a. the chosen nation is a kind of control - it is a nation over everyone, because even the document says america intentionally this and that, but in this case there is no relationship even dialogue. she actually dictates with her document the blu-print. how is already known. it is known that russia

is practically now reading and the feeling is bound to suffer a strategic failure now the word strategic is not here for the sake of a red word . uh, because america has a sore subject right now. this, of course, nuclear weapons, as we talk about skirmishes fossys, of course, by itself immediately pops up in my head. and everything that concerns the use of the body, that is, tactical nuclear weapons, and of course, the states cannot physically forget that it was they from the base ramstein who used a gas mask in ninety-ninth year tactical nuclear weapons, so in theory, in general, it would be necessary to think in this direction, but it always turns out to be better to baptize louder about the other so that they don’t remember about himself. we remember the headlines so to speak, and thaw and so on, when to force e serbia to peace with the help of explosions. here is further. i'll leave it to my own channels, so to speak, but uh, there's another interesting one in this document with nv3. i watched, so, actually, and we know that in recent years, america, in my opinion, has spent an insane amount of effort. here we are forced to state this even in the epic.