i asked her wang and how friendship with america will develop, and she says, well, well, america is not our friend. i don't see her at all. if you are my friend light, who told me that what are you talking about? yes, you will not fly anywhere, in general the world will be closed. i said, you are still in your own way, which means that you and i are closed more than once when we said that there is a connection of such planets, that now there will be a complete hard reset. you have been very busy with suffering. and in general, you can ride time with the present time, a sweet for bitterness uh, death by thirst amid abundant lack. here is one of the hardest jobs. find the pen hidden in the hall in the absence of wolf messing. oh, brother boris khmelnitsky, he wanted to be an artist, and everyone knows that he stuttered a lot, if not for olga grigorievich’s grief, he couldn’t say a word at all and reached the people’s artist on saturday at the first

word of st. seraphim of sarov, the lord will have mercy on russia and lead her through suffering to the great glory of the chef, awarded with high awards and recognized masters of cooking, having tested mahi products, take off your hats and congratulate you on being awarded an excellent course mahii makes your dish taste better premiere at kions online cinema. swear that you will be faithful to a friend there is no salvation. time of anger, watch in the un online cinema unpleasantly surprised by the prices for osago osago with a benefit of up to 60

percent. ozone we deliver with love three-layer toilet papers. is there anything to think about? 100% chicken breast meat is used for serving, so you feel the taste of chicken and nothing more, or voila try nuggets strips wings at a delicious point watch right now

only in the online cinema okko cinema 1tv presents is what are you doing here? i am your husband. anton , i don’t understand what caucasian traditions are, there are no

others. i speak russian everywhere quickly, load russian boxes everywhere, you're right, you couldn't. movie one tv presents

so, too, you can't do something like that, somehow put things in order. well agreed, then i'll rest. and your first task. get more paint. that's where the steal should lie and paint this wall white well. thank you. what for? i'll explain it later. great, just want to fuse me. well

, denis nikolaevich still asks you, i'm very busy. yes, he is very busy. trailer he 's here alone do you work for me? 2 minutes already created a bunch of problems. well try hello excuse me. well, at the wrong time, you all got offended , okay, let's say i'm wrong. can i understand

too? everyone can be understood. i thump means, yes, to go to the funeral. well, it's not related at all . well, yes, i won’t go to the funeral pretend you didn't care. well then , let me know you don't care. don't get fat. i don't know there cry for arina you something. let 's split up, and i'll try to figure out what happened there. in any case, both will not make it any easier. and maybe it will be easier for us. and in general, of the two of us, i graduated as a psychologist, so nafig with his advice, in general, we have 20 minutes . everything is in the office, you need to call at least nadezhda is somehow normal.

go.

good evening on the air big game today russia continued to strike at the military command and energy systems of ukraine, and zelensky’s office has already announced a critical

energy situation throughout the country. and zelensky himself wrote that 30% of the power plant had already been destroyed since last week, adding, i quote, that there were opportunities for negotiations with the regime. putin is gone. but we thought that they were gone after the referendums and the entry into russia of four new regions, it turns out not, interesting. how many more times will there be no opportunity for negotiations, and at the same time the kiev the regime continues to make diplomatic steps that make again and again doubt its adequacy. so, for example, today ukrainian foreign minister kuleba sent zelensky a proposal to break off diplomatic relations with iran , who is accused in kiev of supplying russia with drones, which is denied in moscow and tehran, and again, interesting. how many how many states, according to this logic , russia should break off diplomatic relations, and even today the verkhovna rada of ukraine recognized the sovereignty of the so-called chechen republic,

ichkeria, that is, a terrorist organization, which was recognized as a state only by the afghan taliban in 2000, that is, the kiev regime put itself on a par with the taliban. here is the then-style zelensky and moamar, and a steelban, when he is able to ah, and ah, the latter helped in organizing the september 11 attacks and that's it. this is just a reminder of what is at stake in this conflict, but in addition to the future of ukraine and the future of russia, the struggle is undoubtedly for the world order, and its prospects largely depend on the outcome of the russian special operation and how the settlement of this conference will be. yes, and this is well understood by the united states, which provoked this conflict in order to unleash a hybrid war against russia in order to weaken it. and thereby significantly change

the balance of power in their favor. strengthen and restore your crumbling world leadership. about the same that global leadership is still, but the only one acceptable to the united states model of their participation in international relations. yesterday, the united states secretary of state very unambiguously reminded me of a pancake, speaking at stanford university. listen to his performance. from our point of view, there is now a competition for the shape of the world order, what will be the next period of history after the cold war, whose values ​​​​will be reflected in our simple choice and it became obvious after the second world war that the world does not organize itself for the united states such a choice, if we do not participate in the organization of the world order, if we do not if we play a leadership role, then one of two things will happen, or someone else will play this role, for example, china and it will probably play it in a way that would not coincide with our interests and values, or even worse, the leader’s place will be empty. in that case, there will be a vacuum that the

bad things can fill before the good things fill in, so we would like to participate in this, we would like to lead the process and understand what these good things are and how they can benefit us. that's how it is in american the world is not he can regulate himself, he definitely needs a guide, naturally, there are good things in the face of the united states. there are such things, the right side of history, there is the wrong side of history, and if there is no american leadership in the world, then everything will plunge into tartars andrey yes, i must say that blinken is not very at odds with history, even with recent history what he forgot after the collapse of the soviet union, the americans declared themselves the winners of the cold war and said that they were hyper powers. this is not even a great power, not a super power, a hyper power, and they wanted to spit on everyone on the un on

all of their own. uh, partners of rival allies, but i personally witnessed when the shackle spoke we are too strong to discuss with anyone at all the issues that interest us are our problems. we decide. these questions are different . damn, if he were honest, he would say, yes, these 20 years. we have gone through these 20 years. we have not been able to create real working new structures. they were told. by the way, michael mandelbaum. there were a number of others who wrote. listen take some historical lessons from experience and do something for yourself. why are you trying to humiliate russia to isolate, there, and so on, did not spare, the treaty of versailles does not tell you anything. here is the humiliated dignity of germany, the desire to take revenge,

but this is, well, at least hmm, uh, the same thing, that is, many healthy normal smart people warned. and now what does he say already in the conditions? when economically, at least in purchasing power parity, the american economy, the second since the fourteenth year since the age of 14 for 8 years, it is not the first economic power, when uh this one said, huh? the author of the fu kidzet trap, er, timing, hormonal, he says, i can’t accustom my students at harvard to the idea that the american economy is not the first. they cannot believe it, because from the end of the 19th century. she was the first and suddenly it's not like that anymore. america is no longer

even the main technological power, because even otherwise, by the way, eric schmidt is an outstanding person, one of the founders of google who left. he he was god 2 years ago about uh, so, uh, farida zakharia said, if we don’t immediately contribute 50 billion to the creation of new developments in artificial intelligence, if we are a million talented young people from all over the world, we don’t bring ours. the country and do not integrate our society, we will lose leadership in the world in scientific technological and in all other respects. why am i saying this to generalize? the fact is that under these conditions, to say that america can become a global leader in conditions when they

trump, that he humiliated his allies insultingly, and these destroy the economy of their allies, with whom you are going to create a new world order, but this is the qur'an to death, because obviously he is right in only one. when america's war unleashed against russia and china is over, the winners will dictate the terms of the new world order, well, uh, actually, it's very funny to me. um, listen to blink on the american global riga, they are out of poverty and the need for american global leadership, because not only the world is not wants this leadership. here is the biden administration, and biden himself, was very fond of repeating that the world is waiting for the return of the united states as a benevolent hegemon. this is self-deception, and deception of all the others and self-deception that does not wait for the e world of this

hegemon. the world runs fine without the united states. but besides this, the united states has also lost all ability to exercise real leadership by the force of the absolute dysfunction of its domestic political system, which is in a state of political civil war. and this situation is aggravated by the american. with the chemical crisis, bloomberg wrote to bloomberg that the probability of the united states entering a recession is 100%. in my opinion, the united states is already in a recession. well bloomberg thinks it's 100%, er, a possibility. this news was, uh, from 3 weeks before the midterms, which, of course, cannot be good for the popularity of the biden, who has recently been eating ice cream. uh, trying to convince the americans that everything is fine in the american economy, that there will be no recession. uh, inflation, uh other countries are worse than in the united states

. therefore, in the united states, everything is fine. and here's how uh react to a similar situation, uh, for example, uh florida senator republican florida senator riskot, listen i want to say that joe biden and the democrats provoked the inflation that we have, which hurts families. i grew up in a poor family. i saw my mother fight inflation. people are fed up with this. they're fed up with a president who doesn't care about gas prices or prices, their president doesn't care about food crime. it just doesn't bother him. he is constantly surrounded by employees and the secret service. meanwhile, crime is on the rise in the country. you can see it everywhere people are concerned about it. they are worried about their future , they are worried about the situation at the border. he does not want to talk about any of these topics. and if he speaks, he commands other people to do so, he does not take any responsibility upon himself. and children are just

taught that it is impossible to do this, that you need to take responsibility for your problems, he flies in the world dreams this person who has no idea what is really happening in the real world alexandra mikhailovich well, such political leaders are such the united states with such internal problems. how can global leadership be exercised? uh, you know what they said , there are two opinions, mine and the wrong one, of course, they played too much, and it seems to me that i will continue, i think your thought, because uh political defeat inside the country. it is, of course, based on all economic foundations, and no matter how we wanted, if you look at recent years, even decades, the americans, of course, cannot be said that absolutely hmm there, in their everything , absolutely in all decisions, they deviated from the analysis of the economic situation, but now violence against the economy prevails over economic science, if you look at the 2008 crisis of course here's a

recent nobel prize-winning american. he, uh, managed to save america from a collapse that should have already happened in a year. yes. he saturates the economy enormously. hmm dollars. and thus he saved by introducing into contradiction with the economic thought that has developed in america but if you look at the whole, of course, this is real violence, which in my opinion is dictated by how they feel today. well, outside outside everything outside the rules outside the law outside, that is, they draw all the rules of the game themselves and see what happens in what this violence against the economy manifests itself, firstly, they , uh, destroyed at home. uh, in fact the real economy of their seasoned domestic products consists of services for the most part. if he look export structure. and if you look at the comparison with germany, the same quite recently, well, it’s not in favor in america, because they don’t have difficult

exports. that is, it is replaceable, which means that germany's replaceable industry has been producing and is producing until recently a completely different type of export, when destroying the german economy as a result of german exports. we are actually watching. the destruction of the german economy, by the way, chinese exports are also not difficult, they are just massive, and therefore the americans are now thrown to why what, they became urgent. uh, by any means to drag the european industry industrial production into their economy. but this is a complex process. it is very long. it is a costly idea, yes and yes, and they are faced with the fact that it has come into conflict with their goals and objectives, the expectations of the economy do not meet the second look at what they are doing from europe, they are not just destroying it as an ally. they destroy, showing anti-economic measures. what are they doing take our gas at a high price even they subsidize it today. it is quite acceptable in comparison with difficult gas, but difficult gas and difficult gas is not a product of russia and is all a product of the stupidity

that the americans have imposed their green agendas on. they imposed it on everyone else, proving to the whole world that there are other approaches to energy. and these are all the steps, uh, but what they were told in saudi arabia is not yes, you didn’t develop, didn’t conduct research on oil production, we want, but we can’t increase oil production, i don’t take the political aspects of economic therefore all these steps are the result of current policies that have been going on for many, many years. and what we have today, they continue to carry out violence not only in the economy in politics and now in the military sphere, they keep promising nothing , so any prolongation of the conflict in ukraine is a disaster for them, because sooner or later they will have to answer for their obligations fulfill, so i agree with you that today america is demonstrating weakness and potential to stop. maybe you can print money, but they are no longer needed, it turns out that dollars can be replaced by another currency absolutely. they themselves broke what people used to do. they did not

believe in what is possible, inflation. so people did not believe that they could live without dollars. it is also possible to continue many other things, therefore, today, destroying your own postulates, these are the ones on which they are based. the economy, including politics, they thereby bury themselves, but trying to save, again, do not analyze the situation. they throw in there, as you know, in the fire, even more, not extinguishing the fire from the means, and igniting and look what happens today. then they lose. china, on the eve of the congress, announce that it is necessary to withdraw, so colleagues will tell you more in more detail. yes, to withdraw something actually manufacturers to reduce production. e important elements. there, including microelectronic chips. yes, what are they doing, they are building relations with china and what are they doing with africa and latin america, they are destroying the whole world and do not notice it and are still trying to teach us and therefore today we understand it's great that if we respond with serious

economic successes, well, i'm not saying there are military economic successes. we will accelerate the destruction, including the political destruction of america. well, uh, it seems to me that there is more and more in the world. they know to understand the sudden world for sure that america is pursuing a non-colonial policy towards the rest of the world. and for some reason it seems to me that in germany, too, gradually. here , in hindsight, what is called a speedy brain, they begin to feel the destructiveness of american policy towards. uh, only one germany river, yes, when one could imagine that america comes and goes not only with nothing, but with the worst result. i hope everything is positive, but it leaves with a concussion. saudi arabia is not only europe yes, there are countries in europe, let's not name them again, which consider it possible not only to oppose the american opinion, but to consider it publicly that it is wrong and runs counter to the interests of the peoples living in europe and not only when

it was, but uh speaking of germany uh. here. to me it seems that scholz's idea is to create the united states of europe, and he has been talking about this a lot lately. again on understanding, and the fact that, well, as it were, in the world that america is building and in those atlantic relations that america is building, the role of europe is very unenviable. yes, europe's role is expendable. this is, as it were, in the realization of american interests. in addition, in europe, and in germany, there is indeed a growing strategic distrust in relation to the united states, in part not only because of the policies they are pursuing, but also because of the dysfunction that we see in the american domestic political system. and this dysfunction will continue to grow because there is indeed a political civil war going on in the united states. and the republicans are in favor of a slightly different policy. e, even at the level

of rhetoric, and in relation to their allies, the attitude of europeans. here. listen to what the researcher of one of the most atlantic american structures of the german foundation writes on this subject, marshall a. here is his bruce stolkes. listen er part of his article from forinoves. uh-huh it's not a lack of diplomacy and military skill that threatens america's global leadership, but a crisis of legitimacy polls and interviews around the world show that the public and elites in countries that consider themselves allies of the us harbor doubts about the state and direction of american democracy. they no longer see her as a role model and are worried. can the american political system still provide credible the results behind the ever-fluctuating popularity of american presidents are a steady decline in the international assessment of the strength of the us political system if people around the world can no longer

rely on, for example, american democracy, which is always ready to take decisive action to solve global problems, washington will lose its moral authority. artyom pavlovich well, when i read this article in the form of a face, i immediately remembered, firstly, the recent speech of the barrel that europe cannot. strategically trust the united states barrel said that now it's getting close, like everything is fine. you. in fact, everything is very bad. yes, but now, if the republicans come, they will come, it will become much worse, i immediately remembered the speech of scholz, and at the recent e berlin congress of the european, e socialist party of the party of european socialists, when he said that europe should get a big foreign policy and military autonomy, which the countries of the european union must give up before the last instrument of national sovereignty is the right, the veto on foreign and security policy, but the result

is something resembling the united states of europe , that is, such a significant advancement in the federal model of european integration. because of this, the highway protrudes, it protrudes. uh, because he really understands. what are the prospects for europe in the current atlan model? relationships and what the united states is or am i overestimating it, well overestimating it, i guess scholz should not be underestimated, but it is important to understand that this is an idea that was not the first to be voiced, and scholz continues what his predecessors said. well, in particular, ah zigmur. gabriel er, minister of foreign affairs, in the third cabinet of angela merkel and a steinmeier spoke and in general this is actually a very common idea of ​​a social democrat. thoughts about the strategic autonomy of europe so

or otherwise it was that these discussions, ah, after february 22, practically disappeared for a moment and now they are reappearing, but in other circumstances and from slightly different angles, it says that among germans, at least least accurately elite really. the notion that strategic autonomy is the only possible way out for germany to get out of the crisis that is now at least finding at least some way out of the crisis into which the country is now plunging precisely because of this transatlantic unity elevated to the absolute elevated to the highest virtue of germany's foreign policy this is the only chance now, it is important to recall such a moment here. ah. the last parliamentary elections in germany when they were were very intense and there were many possible coalitions at some point that could be formed. one such coalition was the so-called left coalition possible at some point. these are the social democrats the

green and the left party. and two of these parties, green and left, in principle advocated conclusions american nuclear weapons from the territory of germany and at some point, when there was a rumor that this could be a coalition that could refresh german politics, the publication of a statement from the american. sides from the german press that in no case should this happen. it would seem that we are talking about just some hypothetical probability, very small, but even this caused a significant uh, panic on the part of the transatlantic community, of course, understandable. this coalition did not materialize and green immediately went such a refusal, yes. no. no, we didn't mean exactly that, uh, we meant negotiations with american partners, but the very fact that even such cautious attempts to rethink the foundations of the transatlantic consensus in german foreign policy stumble. here's to such resistance. they talk about a lot. they talk about what potential this has, that this potential sees and will be

counteracted for the time being. well, of course germany is very difficult. uh, german traditional political it is very difficult for the elite to question the adherence to the transport, and for the union because the german political litho is largely created by hands. uh, the united states and not think of themselves as from the united states, that is, they can not say directly, but in my opinion it is important that scholz is not just talking about the strategic autonomy of europe, but in combination with deepening integration in the european union, uh, in combination really because if countries give up the last instrument of their national sovereignty within the european union, namely , scholz is calling for this, then they will take a colossal step towards the united states of europe. yes, and this is important, because if they are really created, the united states of europe will not immediately be strategic and perspective, but transatlantic

relations are a model of transatlantic relationships can change agree very briefly tokendra. yes, very briefly. i just wanted to say that europe cannot do this. and what schultz says is a big stupidity, of course, there were more smart predecessors. the fact is that as long as germany is, in your words, i want to say a colonial power or a semi-colonial one with limited sovereignty, and it is the engine of the european union, if the main thing is that the engine is in such a humiliating dependence on washington and what kind of independence and independence of europe can we ever say it is so clear from the moment when the lord and the first secretary general said that nato is being created by america, uh, that is

, so to speak. here you are to the foot and you will be to the foot and when it is announced that entire sectors of the economy will be transferred to america and frankly go to destroy the german economy. and what kind of independence can one speak of in europe if the main engine is in such a pitiful state, germany is really a country with limited sovereignty, this is what is now proposing that all eu countries become yes, but it is possible that such a united europe will appear that will really change the balance of power in transport relations . i don’t know, yes, but this is the idea that the schols very systematically promotes, but in any case the main country with which the united states competes in matters of world order. this is china, of course. and you alexander mikhailovich already mentioned that right before the 20th congress of the chinese communist party, the united states made a gift to china in the form of new and very severe restrictions on

high-tech products for the export of chips, the supply of chips. uh, in china they blacklisted about 30 chinese companies, but they gave another gift to the dolphin for the twentieth congress. they published a national security strategy, where it is written in black and white what exactly. a is the main systemic strategic adversary of the united states because it is china, according to the united states, that has both the resources and the political will to change the world order, and that's just about the world order, as the subject of conflict between the united states and, uh, china, uh. in the same stanford talk, tony linkin was talking. look, from my point of view, china also wants to organize, own a more anti-liberal world order. on the contrary, we are interested in creating a liberal world order , and this is the competition. well, at

the same time, in his speech at the twentieth congress back on sunday, when ping made a speech, he stated that china opposes all forms of hegemonism, the cold war mentality, interference in the internal affairs of other countries and double standards, and emphasized that china itself does not will strive for hegemonism said blue ding. and ivan yurievich here. do you think he really wants to? china to build that anti-liberal world order, which the hell is talking about, or the united states is simply judging by itself. it seems to me, yes, we should start with the fact that in general this statement of the question, that a certain country is fighting for global leadership. this, of course, is the american formulation of the question. eh, regarding china, we do not see this in any chinese program documents. eh, moreover, there are no historical precedents, in general, yes of course, in ancient times in the middle ages there was a so-called china-centric

system of international relations, but one must understand that it was spreading. in general, only on the neighboring side, china, moreover, when china had enough resources to start its colonial expansion, as they did in their time. ah, the european powers. china did not do this for all sorts of reasons, but we cannot say that the historical precedent is that china, as soon as it receives enough resources begins a struggle for leadership. no, the chinese documents do not say anything about this at all. and even if we look at such concepts as the community of the common destiny of mankind. both the belt and the road for those uh concepts, which are often very uh, are being pitched as china's bid for world leadership. we will see that all these concepts are inclusive, that china emphasizes everywhere that it is not going to build the belt alone and that it is not going to be the leader of the community of the common destiny of mankind. this is something that china offers to the whole world in in a sense, these are concepts that may even be needed somewhere for the internal agenda of

china, because china is still largely immersed in solving internal issues. let it go. we even somewhere may not trust chinese programs to speak. well, you never know what is written. let's look at the real things. let's look at the real things. china is a large number of countries china is a key economic partner there, it is actually using debt instruments. maybe everything control, but if the countries where china we spread our model of our organization model. states do not have their own model of organization of the state of society, their ideology, such countries do not exist, although there is sri lanka, which is in an agreement, in fact, bondage, tajikistan kyrgyzstan montenegro if we look at the united states of america there are more examples than we need, therefore.

in my opinion. this is the view through american optics look at this as some kind of struggle for the place of the king of the hill. on the contrary, china is always emphasized that it is for a multipolar world order. yes, china wants to be a great power. china wants to be one of the leaders of the world device as well, but if it has the ambition to be the sole leader, here is my view as an expert sinologist. no, i completely agree with you, when the united states accuses china of leadership ambitions, they really want to protect, and they are their own leadership. convince everything else humanity. well, if not us, then china. yes, and we are , like, better than china, according to the united states. but in fact, and the chinese approach is very much in tune with the russian approach. and when xitinping talks about a more just world order. after all, what is meant is a multipolar world, a world without a single global hegemon, but really a world where each country will have subjectivity. and where

each side will be independent and sovereign, and not one, a neo-colonial world of unipolar dictatorships that are now trying to protect the united states we'll break through and be back at the studio in a few moments. no problem cuba live broadcast saturday on pervy

the impeccable quality of coffee beans, jacobs creates a rich taste of your coffee. choose jacobs beans at wildberries for even more benefits with the new ozon bank card

millions of products at discounted prices every day. open additional discounts. open the basic map in the ozon app diapers-panties for children for 809 rubles. i'm a photographer. if there are skin problems in the pictures, it’s easy for me to fix them in their life masking is not an option akriderm gk of complex action helps fight inflammation, reddening of infections and itching on the skin and gives more confidence in life and the ladder. akriderm gta healthy skin, beauty. money is being transferred from your account immediately. pin code to stop the operation ok now it's the protector. i ended the call, they are scammers. order a sim card on the tinkoff.ru website and get the most effective protection against spam and scammers tinkoff is the only one. birthday 69.99 magnet answers discounts presents travel

in russia, book accommodation on the site daily.ru apartments hotels guest houses at affordable prices 150,000 options for every taste. and i’ll also rent a super-cashback of 30% of the apartment for a day, the vtbeite team will switch from pension to vtb where every ten thousandth pensioner will get 100,000 rubles. and each pensioner is guaranteed to receive 1,000 rubles. switch to vtb and everything will work out. it has been proven that the virus can cause blood clots, the natural medicine gink. uma protects against blood clots, reduces blood sharpness and improves memory ginkaum from the company evalar and protects against blood clots and improves memory. we have always admired you for those who break horizons, do not forget about those close to you who are not building a business, but

the future of you who know that business is more important than big words and who know how to give more. than receive not only as names. investing in your future living in a huge country on which the sun never sets you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to be able to say tinkoff bank photo in russia at today's prices and include back all your plans. sovcombank people are more important on the air big game

we talked before the break about the fact that the united states accuses china of ambitions of global hegemonism. and that if the united states ceases to be the leader, then supposedly china will take the place of the united states; this reminds me of a book that was once american. naturally was published in enchino. rolls the world, that is, that's when china will rule the world. again, this is very american. yes, uh, here. uh, if not us, then there will be someone who's in your opinion the united states uh, worse than us, so of course we should stay but now and when uh the 20th congress of the chinese communist party is going on in beijing and many in the world. actually, they sum up the results, and the ten-year period of government is still sitting. most likely, he will be

re-elected for another five-year term a and a reflect on those trends, but on those prospects for chinese development, which add up today and this is what assessment, and the development of china and e jinping gives uh, well, considered one of the most authoritative and in-depth experts on china in the west, former australian prime minister and foreign minister kevin rad, who today heads the asia society in new york. listen to an excerpt from his article foreigners and put an end to the era of pragmatic non- ideological management. instead, he developed a new form of marxist nationalism that shapes the content of the economics of domestic and foreign policy. china, while xi jinping is not builds castles in the air out of theory to justify

a decision the chinese communist party made for other more practical reasons. for all intents and purposes, ideology determines politics more often than vice versa, such as pushed politics. flenism economics to marxism, and foreign policy to right-wing nationalism. he reaffirmed the influence and control of the ccp over all areas of public policy and private life, stepped up the activities of state-owned enterprises and imposed new restrictions on the private sector. in addition, he stirs up nationalism when he spends more and more an assertive foreign policy fueled by a marxist-inspired belief that history is irreversible on china's side and that the world is based on might. beijing will lead to a more just international order these ideological tendencies. not just a return to an era. mao's worldview xi more complex. than a worldview. mau it combines ideological purity with technocratic pragmatism. well, to

summarize, then, according to kevin glad xi jinping ended the era of densioping, and began a new era that has a number. taxes, and with the mao period zedong, but of course not quite. e period. mao zedong is still much more pragmatic although kevin is happy to believe that the role of ideology, the role of party control has increased significantly. uh, that's how much this assessment that kevin stated is glad to correspond to reality, the covenrant is certainly a very authoritative sinologist in his opinion, of course, you need to know to understand, but i note that this is a quote. she is not free, again, from this desire. ah, to show china as some kind of scarecrow, like some kind of horror story, these analogies. uh, analogies with a small zedong, because this is something that is clearly frightening, of course, but if we think about it, and what is the cden fino board. it looks like holding the young is conceived only in the fact that both

there and there there is a strong leader at the head of china and the coming of power of sedinfina in 2012. this was precisely the answer to the inside of the elite and somewhere, probably. the public demand for a strong leader after the era of collective leadership, when many issues were not resolved, they were attributed to successors and so on. this is the board of si, it looks like the board few. but if we remember others, let's say it's an associative series. uh, mao zedong. this is barracks communism the great leap forward. we see that wuxi has nothing similar, nothing similar if we look at nationalism, and again, the word that in the quote to grapes sounds so scary enough. ah. we have to say this, that, of course, the modern communist party. china is a party, and national and even i would say nationalistic is what it is for quite a long time, but it was going, but with all this, it nationalism, which considers a nation, and all

the nationalities living no, only the khanitsa, not only the chinese. yes, so it shouldn't. this should not be taken. the nationalism of xi jinping, how shall we say, the nationalism that existed, for example, in europe in the middle of the 20th century. yes, and we must understand what is perhaps the key word in this quote. kevin is pleased - this is the pragmatism of the whale's policy is still very, very pragmatic and as far as the foreign policy is concerned, rather a log of the political course. and as for the economy also, wait here you know, i'm very sorry. i myself really like to read kevin redde, but this quote is one of the most e such that's because it is replete with clichés and stereotypes. it’s terrible that nationalism does not develop the market, then another third, by the way, other

analysts on china said that many expected that the son would come after the hutent, in fact, he would advance further and become chinese almost gorbachev even more political reforms. freedom there, then another third and, of course, it turned out that he did not live up to expectations, which were in the west. and why, because in the west at home we raised this giant on our own heads. and they themselves write that at some point, by opening our market, by investing, we raised it as a counterbalance to the soviet union. the soviet union collapsed instead of closing it, strangling it, and so on, and we lifted and lifted. and now we don't know what to do with it, and that's why everyone turned out to be a strong leader. absolutely inappropriate for the west and their expectations . and the last thing i wanted to say. the whole empire

except for this crazy american an empire that promotes liberal interventionism means changing the regimes for promoting democracy, and so on, all the empires don’t give a damn about selling the promotion of democracy there, and not conquering the state. they run the roman empire of byzantium there is everyone else. china is the same thing, they do not need the chinese model and chinese nationalism imposed not in africa or in latin america, this is the fundamental difference. china is the leader because he is already in first place in terms of domestic phallus. of course , china is the leader in terms of its gdp, because many countries really want to imitate it in many ways in the form of the success of the chinese model, but china does not want to rebuild the whole world for itself. he doesn't

try to build one. a rigid system of rules and institutions based on chinese domination, as the united states does in the case of american domination, and this is a fundamental and this fundamental difference, these attempts have failed everywhere, because it is impossible to impose liberal democracy in africa in asia on the muslim world. china is helping the development of developing countries, not trying to rearrange them after your own pattern, but in fact there are many, even in the united states, who have doubts. can the united states afford to continue the simultaneous confrontation from russia to china at the same time, but nevertheless, uh, the region that the united states really sees as a region of preferential rivalry with russia and china at the

same time is becoming more and more important. . this region is the arctic. it is of great strategic importance for russia. just recently, just over a week ago , the biden administration published another national strategy for the arctic region. this is the official american main document on the arctic where russia and china are designated as the two biggest challenges for the united states and the liberal world order in the arctic and the central idea of ​​this document is that the melting of the arctic ice and thus the opening of the arctic, the transformation of the arctic into an ordinary sea , but turns it into the arena of confrontation, that is, the confrontation is automatically projected into arctic oceans. geopolitical rivalry with e, russia and china and yesterday the same idea was emphasized by senator angus king, who said that because of global warming and the melting of the arctic ice. the arctic may in the future

become the center of a global center. global confrontation with russia and china here. listen. if you look at the mediterranean, there have been wars for more than 1,000 years to determine the relationship between the countries located around the mediterranean , the question is, can we open artik and avoid conflict? in this context , it is much more understandable, in fact, it becomes the desire of the united states to drag sweden and finland a into nato, because yesterday , again, the representative of the state department, derek scholley, said that after their entry into nato, the united states expects, i quote, a fundamental shift in nato thinking in relation to the arctic. i mean , you feel yes, where they lead, uh, the united states. but the arctic is for us. this is a vital region. here's what we need in this regard. what policy in this regard, we should conduct, and in this

region, which is very important for our economic development, there is the northern sea route there. a large number of our compatriots live there. i mean, the arctic and so on. it seems to me that when you dwelled in such detail on this issue, they cut the rumor that we have worldview contradictions by the americans, but they don’t look at what they, uh, they definitely want to lay their hands on their paws, and moreover, they perceive it as artificial education. yes, for them to impact on any process. this is protecting your own interests. and we live by the principle. here they are, if they are not there, it will be a disaster for them. but we believe that the arctic is for everyone the arctic is a place where those who see a creative humanity in the future, where

projects are being implemented that affect the interests, working on the main needs of all countries and peoples, but geographers. here and there, but only a madman can imagine that we won't be there. we are already there, in fact, without russia, this is nato without the usa. i would be so, in spite of this we lend a hand. there is a friendship partnership with all those who are not even close to the arctic, but we always emphasize that this is a zone of our natural interests. but we don't limit it. we just remember, we ask you to always remember that we are the main americans there, despite the fact that they are not there. or if they believe from the edge that they should be present only they and this is their mistake. and in fact, this is once again a demonstration, because they bury themselves in everything. here we are i'm not i want to dislike these here, unlike my colleagues. i have nothing to do with americans. well , look at the politics of politics, they buried themselves. they were the first to demonstrate that it turns out that

you can throw anything on the ballot. they they have used every form of voting or and everything that is possible, and even here they have lost because everything is contested. they have limited the incumbent in everything they have demonstrated. well, just awful. now they're moral values, buried in them now as recently in one my colleague at home. one said that now, if a white person enters the audience, he must understand that he is the last in line for possibly a job, because there i don’t even want to list who is in front of him. it's terrible, if we're talking about the economy, they've, well, lost all credibility. in the military field. they demonstrate that they themselves are afraid of being afraid of the physical level to fight with a serious power. and we see that in all this, including in the arctic, for some reason they consider themselves in the right dictate terms. and this means one thing, that we must, unlike them, continue our policy. we would have to develop, proceeding from our

own interests from the interests of our allies and believe me constantly. declaring and, most importantly , implementing such a partnership with the understanding that we are the main ones there will give us, uh, success on this front. and, all the more so, russia is increasingly cooperating in the arctic and on arctic projects with countries such as china, india and many other non-western centers of power that they really understand the benefits of cooperation in the arctic of a gentle frontation and respect russia unconditionally. but the arctic, unfortunately , will, uh, increase its significance as a region of rivalry from the united states. but of course, ukraine remains the main e direction of the russian american hybrid war of their hybrid war against us, and that's what's interesting. recently, a growing number of very popular american open-in makers have been talking about the need to urgently change american policy in order to prevent escalation and

talk about the danger of escalation. and at least they say that the united states should do the same . to draw red lines, what is allowed, what is not allowed, including for ukraine, and that the united states itself should determine these red lines for itself, and not ukraine for the united states, and elon musk continues his saga on twitter, which is already every day just writes that we are on the verge of a very dangerous escalation. here is uh, the last uh view of it. uh, it was he who compared the importance of crimea to russia with the importance hawaii for the united states in fact, the crimea is much more important for russia than for the united states but this simply reflects the understanding. yes , this is an approach, but from the side of a mask, that for russia this is an existential issue. but in addition to the mask, barack obama appeared, who remains the most popular representative of a democratic politician today. e.