unfortunately, not yet. e hmm problems with shells, they have a fairly well-oiled system. uh, communications orlan command post or mortar battery instructions artillery battery, which greatly reduces our potential. unfortunately, we were not ready, and even the american drones of the first batch. we were not prepared to fish for russian electronic warfare. yes. they turned out to have a fairly effective rap, because we can give drones, but they jam, right? that's how nikolaevich well, now, after listening to pashinsky what can you conclude? about the general correlation, er, strength and weapons on the battlefield, well, the main conclusion that we made even before his interview was that there would definitely be a victory. e is behind us, but the second conclusion suggests itself that sometimes we are engaged, perhaps partly rightly, but we talk more about those shortcomings that we

must, e, eliminate, to get rid of, from which to fight more effectively, but still praise from the lips enemy. she, as they say, is worth a lot, what i would like to pay attention to, after all. this is the head of e defense enterprises of ukraine, and he did not say anything to his american, as if interlocutor, that the ukrainian industry would produce something , repair something, do something in general, there is no ukrainian military industry not in conversation not in reality, that is, ukraine today completely depends on these same military epistavki. but what else would i like to add here. why is it so convenient for the west to supply a lot of weapons, because even er, giving away all their warehouses. uh, giving away some of what they're currently producing. west after all understands that russia will never attack back, that china does not attack the west, that is, being in a situation where no one

will start an aggressive war against them, it is very convenient to supply weapons right up. as they say to the white bones of those whom you want to pit against your opponents. well, can they really miscalculate here? uh, but uh, the essence of pashinsky's interview is to beg. give more. give, give, give, indeed , the ukrainian military-industrial complex is not functioning. maybe, probably, only to repair something, but will they give about it after advertising? martial law in the new regions and increased security measures in a number of neighboring regions, and additional powers of the head and compliance with the deadline for payments, mobilized an important statement by the president. unanimously adopted decrees of vladimir putin, which were announced at a meeting of the security council, approved by the upper house of parliament, they come into force tomorrow

for the safety of people, residents of kherson and some districts of the region are transported to the left bank of the dnieper in a new place, migrants will be provided with the maximum help attack, the attempt of the nationalists to land troops to seize the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant bogged down ended in failure, the sun continues to strike at the elderly quarters, energodara moment of truth spent stockpiles of missiles non-existent projects and corruption curator of the ukrainian defense industry about the true state of affairs in a conversation with the franks. we have always admired you for those who break horizons, do not forget about loved ones who know how to

give more than they got. choosing faith , hope, love, not only as names, investing in their future, living in a vast country, over where the sun never sets you are already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank of the year in russia now many are betting life with a sovcombank loan make important purchases at today's prices and turn all your plans back on. people are more important than

parmesan and cheese sauce with 100% marbled beef new angus four cheeses only at burger king and me and you and you and me and you and each cash loan at a flat rate of 8.9 each this tele2 discovery represents a doubling gigabytes. every 3 months the tariff is included for new subscribers and get double gigabytes forever. sovcombank in three minutes in two clicks on one call to make a deposit at eight and 5% per annum

sovcombank closer to people and gls multivitamins in a blue jar for 399 rubles. immediately give an advantage in the game in finance, as in chess, choosing the right bank and fair rates will give an advantage, but in real life. open a savings account reserve and earn up to nine percent per annum next time. let's go to chess. the most delicate ice cream in exquisite chocolate glaze is pure line, unrealistically delicious ice cream, the vtb team will offer a solution. order a free st. petersburg card , it turns out 1,000 rubles. 2% cashback on everything. what are accustomed to housing and communal services without a commission. prove a free vtb card right now come to vtb everything will work out. up to 20 percent discounts on

artel appliances, for example, an altels refrigerator with an inverter compressor for 36,999 rubles. in m.video or eldorado offers its own conditions for mortgage insurance. compare will help not to overpay, buy or extend mortgage insurance with savings of up to 4,000 rubles. in one of the ten largest insurance companies on the site or in the application. if insurance, then compare choose better halva card surprises, keeping a free installment plan of 10 months halva, as before, weighs nothing to you. still zero interest on installments and fees. for service , too, no, halva, a weightless installment plan, is a significant advantage. live big game the biden administration is driving the ukrainian army to slaughter, for which, in order for the democrats in the congressional elections in the united states of america not to lose

the majority in the senate to the house of representatives, it is clear that the biden is much more important than the fate of the lives of thousands of people there, who are already tens of thousands, who they are simply dying on ukrainian soil in the name of american domestic political interests, it is a bideno, but naturally a republican majority is not needed, in any of the chambers, because the first thing it will do is a republican majority. this creates a commission to investigate the actions of biden himself and his family, led by hunter biden, who got into all possible stories and continues to get into so far. but there is another aspect. eh, the defeat of the democrats in these elections may mean, indeed, a reduction in support for ukraine from the very beginning of the operation, it seemed that the republican party, even stronger than biden himself, was ready to support the kiev regime. it turns out that no, in any case, uh,

a statement was made by the leader of the republican minority, so far, that in the house of representatives, but a likely future speaker. uh, house of representatives of the future nancy pelosi, uh, mccarthy who literally said this listen to house gop leader kevin mccarthy saying republicans are ready to forego aid to ukraine next year if they get control of the house of representatives, i think the people will be in a recession, and they are not going to write a check to ukraine, the congressman told mccarthy, saying that one of the reasons for the refusal aid is the biden administration 's ignorance of domestic issues that the republican party considers a priority people are starting to weigh that ukraine is important. but at the same time. that can't be the only thing they're doing, he said, independent analysts say the republicans are likely to gain

control of the house in the november election and mccarthy is ready to take over as speaker if that happens. seriously, actually, especially since yesterday and barack obama, who is generally. now probably the most popular in the democratic party. the popular joe biden said exactly the same thing, that some limits should be set for american aid to ukraine, while biden spoke about the boundlessness of this aid. well, in general , quite a serious opinion. yes, what do you think, how much this will really be confirmed after the elections. uh, or is it just pre-election rhetoric, because really helping ukraine is not popular in america. and there are two main camps some say that we will be for the sake of some mythical principles that we invented for ourselves and believed in them ourselves. let's continue here, uh, unlimited support in time, unlimited as much as necessary, as they

say, uh, and uh, this point of view is promoted by the deep state, various hundreds of various officials, and it is repeated by a number of politicians, but at the same time you know not very quickly, but so thoroughly the opinion is ripening that, in fact, there are our affairs, and there are ukrainian affairs. and as they said in one of our famous films, it is not necessary. here is the personal with the public personal wool with the state. no need to confuse, and now the desire is ripening this point of view, what is needed? separate two questions, and ukrainian affairs - this is not a matter of america's survival. and although for this deep state it is a matter of survival of american hegemonism, but still for its population. they can’t openly say like this, you know, we want to be the main thing in the world, therefore,

earlier due to the fact that we were the main thing in the world. you seem to be rich. and now, to be the main ones in the world and command everyone. we are you rob our dear americans. it's still so open. they cannot say, they manipulate manipulate. here they are trying, uh, to wake them up, there is some kind of national pride talking a lot about values ​​about values ​​about morality, uh, and so on. and here i repeat quite slowly, but very thoroughly, the opinion is maturing that something is going wrong here, it is necessary to understand all this, uh, we need to figure it all out. and one feature that the americans have, and you know it well, vyacheslav alekseevich of american politicians. this is true called the ability to change shoes in the air. what does an instantaneous change in point of view mean, if suddenly the conditions are ripe for this? well, this is more

typical, of course, for ukrainian politicians for american ones, too, in america this is very much there. if indeed this point of view matures enough and, uh, after the elections , american politicians will see that those who adhered to this point of view performed better, many will change their shoes and the mood in america, uh, in political circles, can quickly enough change. it is clear that, again, this foreign policy establishment. the deep state will resist this, but in america, by the way, it’s not for nothing that obama also said this in the rising party of those who want to take the deep state back under the control of politicians. and by the way, obama wanted it too. it's just that she turned out to be a weakling and could not do it, but you can see some sort of, uh, deep desire to do something like that. he still has it,

uh, still remains, so this question on the one hand of ukraine becomes a question. but the main - this is that there is a struggle going on inside america between those who still have to be elected and go out to the people and say something intelligible and those who sit in the offices. i haven’t seen people in the eyes and don’t want to see them and only wants to receive money from them money money for big world projects – this is a contradiction. it is maturing, maturing, maturing, and these interim elections will be a significant step towards aggravating this contradiction. well, we fully expect it in the twenty-fourth year in the presidential elections. that's what you said, uh back to the days when politics were controlled by the deep state. i’m trying to even remember the times when it was, but, of course, franklin roosevelt comes to mind, who yes, most likely controlled the deep

state, but already from enhaur, how did he end his presidency with a speech about how the military industrial complex, then captured all the power. he needs to uh, resist from the next president of korea korea is more likely to become a victim of this deep state. in any case, this is the most a common version and since then somehow ton has not taken it up over the deep state, that is, in fact, it will be necessary to return to the times even 100 years ago of the second world war, but uh, in the case, to be honest, i doubt that this will happen so far depends on the elections at the same time, as we see, a lot, and the outcome of the elections depends to a great extent on the price. what kind of fuel is needed for gasoline, because americans vote, uh, with their wallets very willingly, and if the economic situation is bad, if gasoline is expensive, the ruling the party is losing. and here is the administration of the banner. she, of course, is making titanic efforts to

keep gasoline prices down. there were well-known negotiations and pressure on saudi arabia for custody, then there was a decision on custody. plus about how to still reduce, on the contrary. uh, the americans did not ask, on the contrary, uh, to reduce quotas. uh, oil production. uh, after which the united states is now actively developing a bill moving forward in congress. eh, bake. uh, no- no, oops. if you want, then there is the fight against custody. uh, spread to the guardianship countries. and these are all the major oil producers in the world, except for brazil, uh, antitrust antitrust laws of the united states of america in general, what a crazy idea, but it is taking over the masses in congress, but also, now the americans are uncorking their barrel of strategic reserves. uh-huh 15. e. million barrels, uh, and it's already on the market today. here's how all this could affect the

price of gasoline on the outcome of the election and whether it will cause even more chaos in world markets now with autization of relations for america is normal. the thing is, when they make a mess, they feel right, here i am right right at home. i am very good at fighting, fighting, squabbling, but you know, completely new alliances are being formed now. see how, within the framework of these alliances, the audience is responsible for independence, self-sufficiency of politics appears for americans. i do n't like it very much. and you will notice the saudis were the first to say about anti-trust things, not the americans. they say let you want to force russia sell at a certain price ceiling, and win your legislation. don't want to watch. it 's called a cartel. here is your big seven. the so-called or six plus one. this is already a cartel you are creating a cartel start yourself please, because you are scammers who are trying to dictate unfair rules of the game to the whole world today, on average

, food in america continued from 11 to 13% of gasoline. you see what prices they have almost doubled to date in the united states america everyone who is here in this studio , our viewers know that this is a nation absolutely dependent on transportation by car. in every loaf of sausage bread, no matter what the price of gasoline is 15 million barrels, which are released to the market in very short-term conditions, of course, can help. but it will be so individual that it, in principle, will not lead to a global result. you understand what's the matter. they are now in a situation where whatever they do, they complicate the denouement, which will happen in the future. they are now acting on the principle of now nastya but remember that's for politics. it's very bad when they don't think in a catholic way. and now, perhaps, now they will not be able to take one foot out of the clay, but then they will be dirty to the waist. well so far, that's the only consequence here in the motion of this

bill. i see that the saudis have applied to join the brix next. e themselves these, which will produce in the republic of south africa and. by the way, i rule out that south africa, uh, will just support this application and other members were also this is going to be very interesting, but the american reaction is, of course, to uh, domestic politics. she sometimes. e, in general, predictable, but on the other hand, it is extremely cynical, as we have said more than once. here is elon musk