you need to understand weak that there is no more newspaper for punishment. and you accept that in front of you is a man, not a snot. a man who is able to carry a weapon that is not afraid to go against you. but, which can protect yourself due to the need.

guess yourself, or give the go-ahead. okay, the hell with you. at least the most gifts.

come out, let's talk. i know you did it. come on out, let's talk.

good evening on the air, the big game russia is strengthening the non-western vector of its foreign policy and continues to strengthen relations with the strange east and south, not only and not so much because of the hybrid war waged by the west against russia, but also because it is the countries of the east and south that play an increasingly significant role in the world economy and world politics and one of the most important directions here, this relationship with africa russia proclaimed and began to carry out its return to the african continent at the end of the last decade in 2019 in sochi, the first and very successful russia-africa summit was held, but in in the current conditions, relations with africa are becoming even more important today, vladimir putin received in the kremlin the president of guinea, and

at the same time the chairman of the economic community of west african countries, umar and koku embala. and this is what the president of russia said at the beginning of this meeting. listen. throughout the entire time of the formation of the soviet state of the struggle for independence and after, during the formation of statehood between russia and the soviet union, russia, not your country, always developed very good very kind. e relationship. eh, and today. all the same is developing. i know that you are in charge now. e soviet economic council of west africa after all. 400 million people live in the member countries of this organization 550 billion gdp of all countries and in general in russia, the trade turnover is very

decent and what's the most? the main thing is the very good pace of the increase in trade turnover, we hope that and uh, during your presidency. in this organization. a significant contribution will also be made to the development of e-relationships with your country with members organizations, yes and quite the african continent. and yevgeny nikolaevich you are one of the most authoritative experts on africa in russia, you were the ambassador of the soviet union in one of the african countries and then the ambassador of russia in two african countries here, explain to our viewers why africa is significant for russia why is it important for russia to increase cooperation economic and political with the african continent, first of all, the role of africa is growing sharply and increasing uh, which at a faster pace and political economic humanitarians and imagine a world without africa

today. it is impossible to present itself as africa as the former, as soon as the colonial territories. it's impossible africa another africa plays one of the central roles one of the most influential roles for international and human development. i mean in terms of civilization, because this is a huge territory. this is a huge reserve of creative potential. well, it’s natural mineral natural and therefore treat africa like chukovsky now it’s not only not fashion is bad. and uh, in this regard, uh, maybe, only i welcome all the steps that the russian leadership is taking today russian companies, uh, businessmen, are stepping up

their activities on the african continent well , indeed, africa is becoming an increasingly significant economic direction and it is africa that is one of the the most important markets for such key areas of russian exports as food and beverages. and the weapons. and here, of course, here, uh, russia has objective advantages. in addition, africa is friendly to russia and the continent, and none of the fifty-four african countries have imposed anti-russian sanctions, and many do not support anti-russian resolutions, that is, africa is indeed important from an economic point of view. and the politically friendly continent for russia, and i fully agree with you, the role of africa is growing stronger. and now, it seems to me, the peculiarity of the russian approach to africa , unlike other centers of power

, is that we do not consider africa and not as a former colony, and we consider it as a future colony africa exactly. as a partner, that is, not just as an object of our policy. but as a partner. here are some other advantages russia has over other world centers of power in africa. i agree with the conclusions, but of course, africa russia is very important, first of all, its independent position in the international arena is valued, the independent position of international ones is appreciated that russia takes into account all the features of the entire the many-sided palettes of the african continent, their various interests are not only taken into account, but also respected. it's interesting and focuses on these interests, in order to shoot,

the actual african policy is more effective and fruitful for russia and for its prestigious international lease and the acceleration of its own development, even economic, was taken into account, bearing in mind that russia africa is more than 30% of the mineral resources of the world. well, uh, now it's just going to the altai forum. uh, in the moscow region there are many representatives from developing countries, including african countries, and for me, and ivan alekseevich and i are just participants in this valdai forum. in fact, it is very remarkable how representatives of africa support the anti-colonial narrative that russia is spreading today, and which russia is promoting today in international relations. and that's it for them, and there is a very clear understanding. something that russia is doing today in world affairs, and uh, well, in terms of the ukrainian

conflict and in terms of relations with the west. this is a fight against western colonialism. this is the liberation of the developing world. uh, the vast majority of humanity from that hegemony of that colonialism, that existed in africa. it is very well understood, so, of course, the united states puts a lot of pressure on african countries and arouses and expresses great indignation. why they say they do not join the anti-russian policy of the united states yes and so, but from the answer to this question, but in addition to the african participants in the valdai forum. eh, gave the current president. uh, makisal senegal. uh, right now in senegal, just about in dakar, the eighth international forum on peace and security in africa is taking place, and uh, maki-sal, who, by the way, is the chairman of the african union this year, the chief african international organization

, said that the reason, in fact, one of the reasons that the countries of africa do not join the west's policy against russia is the complete indifference of the west to the interests of africa itself and the needs of africa itself, both in the field of security and in the field of the economy. health areas in general, yes, and why should africa support the west when the west in no way africa supports said the current chairman of the african union and the same understanding is extended to other developing countries. here, listen, for example, what did the current president of one of the allies of the united states of latin america say about the policy of the united states, president of colombia gustav petra the united states destroys all the economies of the world they decide to protect themselves sometimes without thinking about what will happen as a result of such

measures economy latin american countries devastated in latin america robbed all our currencies are depreciating, and not just the colombian peso alexander mikhailovich, i am similar. by the way, this was also discussed, but in the novoaltay forum, that russia either launched or intensified the anti-colonial revolution. here, judging by what the representatives of africa are now saying, latin america is indeed an anti-colonial revolution. but, if we look at history, it's actually a modern, er, situation. it is just a change of form, and in terms of content, as if these countries were for the west and colonies, they remained. it’s just that there were more flexible and, in their opinion, softer or democratic forms of control of these countries from their point of view, they are direct. the governments of these countries have switched to management through finance through e, the imposition of technological and other dependencies there, by the way, in agriculture. this is a well-known topic of transferring the

consumption model of the west to african latin american countries in order to impose on the subsequent production and processing of agricultural products and thereby tie the economies of these countries even more and in fact nothing with points of content and attitude to these strange from the outside. the west has not changed, such a form has changed, softer, more beautiful, as they love sweets, they show everything else there. countries regardless of time period. and today, indeed, we are at the head of the anti-colonial policy, because it has already decided to spread the west boundlessly and without control. this is not only from africa, latin america, asia, but also in relation to european countries, and here we have turned up and we are probably the only ones so far, but we have allies. i agree with us. recently, our colleague speaker of zimbabwe came to the state duma. it is clear that in terms of living standards, but it also went through different stages of its

development. but today this country, despite, even today's difficulties, clearly declares its position. he spoke in the state duma and did not hesitate to call everything as it is and in relation to to the conflict in ukraine and in relation to the west and in relation to the west to africa and to his personal side, where he is the country he represented, that is, in fact. i want to support one thing, that today the countries that today look at russia as partners of an ally see with her a really reliable partner, and most importantly a defender of their interests, so you don’t have their reaction, nothing special from the point of view of common sense would be just amazing, if under the yoke of exploitation, including economic, which continues they would suddenly become supportive of them and the more america further on them the more independent they become in formulating their own interests. the direction of views on russia, well, i completely agree and liberation. uh, most of humanity is a mission. this is

russia's contribution to international relations, at least in the first half of the 21st century, and this is perceived with a bang by this same world majority, but in the united states itself, who are trying to fight this anti-colonial revolution there was a small riot in the democratic party. the truth unfortunately has already been suppressed, but nevertheless it is significant that this rebellion took place and 30 e members of the house of representatives from the democratic party are progressives. the left-wing progressives wrote a collective letter to president biden demanding to immediately begin negotiations with russia to resolve the ukrainian conflict, and this is not about russian-ukrainian negotiations, but russian-american negotiations. that is, they demanded from biden. change policy and move on to direct negotiations. uh, listen to russia, uh, in particular, what was said in this

very letter? given the widespread destruction and the risk of catastrophic escalation, we believe that it is in the interests of ukraine for the united states and the world to avoid a protracted conflict. we urge you to offer active diplomatic efforts for a negotiated settlement of the conflict and a ceasefire to start direct negotiations. with russia well, as i said, the rebellion was suppressed, they immediately let all the dogs, both political and, uh, media, and already today in the evening. the leader of this group of liberal progressive democrats. uh, promila japayal stated that, and she in no way requires biden to change the policy towards ukraine, she fully supports the support of ukraine and that they withdraw the letter itself, as if nothing had happened, that is, the rebellion was suppressed, but andriy left. that's what this performance of the progressive democrats happened. what's in the

split now within the democratic party, which was in fact already quite a long time ago concerns, including foreign policy issues , and progressives are talking about foreign policy, and this is happening at the same time that donald trump insists on a russian-american settlement. and that republicans in congress , too, many republicans in the house of representatives are opposed to building up or continuing endless military aid. e ukraine, that's how important it is in your opinion. here is the speech of the left democrats. this is generally very important, because the left democrats and progressives they have a very strong influence on the democratic party on many issues, both internal and external, but the external agenda suddenly made itself felt. although the progressives, by the way, both in america and everywhere,

these left-wing radicals have always advocated for peace. they are always against war. they are always in favor of reducing military spending. that is, whatever it does. biden does not fit into their picture of the world. moreover. i must say that never this wing. she did not support military adventures in military invasions, there and so on and so forth. it's not steady, and these are not liberal interventionists, so it seems to me that even though they have now withdrawn it, apparently, they carried out explanatory work with them, as they said in the central committee of the cpsu, to put it mildly. yes , because after 2 weeks. well, maybe a little more mid-term elections can not show

that not everything is in order at all. in the kingdom of denmark. we must go to the polls, in uniform orderly rows, there, and so on and so forth. but this, of course, is a serious problem. by the way, i must say that although she is alone, but i see, here she is alone. does more than i don't know the whole lot. here in the tula gabbard. every day she has many hours of programs on youtube and on all channels, and she just hits one point all the time. biden is leading the country to nuclear war, this is a disaster. this irresponsibility of this cannot be allowed, and it reaches so many and it has a very serious impact, so it seems to me that

the mood has already begun to change. it seems to me that after the midterm elections, when they will no longer throw so much effort and the opportunity to suppress it, and they will show themselves even more strongly. not only that, but many simply do not dare to go further for additional expenses. it is not clear why and it is not clear where, because after all, i would like to end this for the americans. the main thing is the american internal problem. what to put on the table? how to pay for medical services? as means, normal education of children is all number. one. everything else is from the evil one. well, i especially agree with your thesis that it is possible that we are now right before our eyes.

we are seeing a resurgence of the anti-war movement in the united states because it was always strong during the cold war. it was very strong during the vietnamese foreign invasion, but america was being torn apart, of course. yes, of course, and this is an anti-war movement, just in the forefront of it were leftists , representatives of the left wing of the democratic party, then this anti-war movement disappeared. but, perhaps, now we are seeing the first shoots of his revival. unfortunately, the american deep state has once again shown its might. as you said, we carried out explanatory work, and p. eh, sweet japayal. this reminded me very much of the explanatory work that the forces had recently carried out on the mask. remember, he spoke with e about peaceful anti-war, in fact, slogans. they immediately announced that they would check him for general threats to national security. after

that, he again tweeted that he would pay for starling in ukraine, regardless of , which means, uh, they would pay for him in the pentagon years and right after that his capitulation statements, while corinne-janquer of the white house council said that we have no claims to mask any investigation against, billionaires. always much more vulnerable in relation to the state than self-progressives, who wanted to spit on politicians today tomorrow, because they themselves decide this policy completely agree, and, of course, the alignment of forces in favor of this e favor of the supporters of peace after the interim. the elections of the united states should increase, because, firstly, there will come more left-wing progressives. yes, and secondly, there will be much more republicans in the house of representatives who are also against the allocation of endless money to ukraine, and their position is recent.

designated kevin mccarthy yes today e minority leader of the republican house of representatives, but already on january 3rd. he may become a speaker next year, and the houses of representatives together and their position can be completely understood, because according to the latest poll cited by morning consult, only 29% of registered republican voters believe that the united states is obliged to help ukraine, that is, 71%, uh, republican voters do not think so, and indeed for them. the top priority is, uh, internal affairs, and in this context, the administration. biden, his allies are trying to hedge, and therefore they want to pass a law, and in accordance with which ukraine is proposed to allocate $ 50 billion $ 50 billion for the next year, that is, to have time to

do this before the composition of the house of representatives changes biden admits that it's big money, but he does not care about these amounts. yes, why because, as he stated in his recent interview, the main thing is to defeat russia. look, we spent a lot of money on helping the ukrainians, but this is much more than about the ukrainians. this is anato in western europe. it concerns the achievement of a clear goal, so that russian president vladimir putin cannot achieve success, you understand, yes, that is, the existential question is not important. how much money is in ukraine the main thing is that president putin cannot succeed, and now logic. these are just such people, it's not just biden. yes, this is a political class, and in the united states the war against russia to the bitter end is very competent, but the well-known american professor, international professor at

harvard university, steven wald, explained in his recent article, that is, stephen wolf is an opponent of this point of view , but it seems to me very popular, what is called on the fingers explained why people like biden adhere to this point of view listen those who speak for the boundless support of ukraine, they believe that everything in the world is interconnected and sensitive to small changes from this point of view. if russia gains something from the war, putin's appetites will grow even more and he will probably think about continuing to blackmail the west to satisfy all his desires the united states and nato will lose credibility wars of conquest will again be considered as legitimate tools of statecraft. china will decide that it can take over taiwan whenever it wants any semblance of order based on the rules will collapse, and then we will be finished, but if russia suffers a crushing defeat, the middle zionists of the whole world will once again be convinced that

aggression does not pay off ukrainian democracy will flourish, liberalism will receive a new life all over the world. china will retreat from taiwan, inflation will fall and happy days will come again, in general. here's according to what's exactly why the biden administration. persistently, despite all the risks of escalation. despite resistance within the country, it continues its policy of hybrid warfare. well i understand why stephen walls. so it explains it, because this is how it can be understood in the united states, states er, in fact, an explanation, of course, a simpler explanation outside the united states will be understood, but still in the united states , if you say so directly, then they won’t understand, if the americans lose this conflict that they fanned around ukraine, then they will no longer be able to do whatever they want in the world. this is not about

the fact that some order based on rules will collapse. there is no such order. is not about the fact that the revisionists will become insolent, as they say, it's not because, uh, it means that something there, china will pounce on taiwan because it thinks that u now it's possible, this is about the fact that, uh, the united states will break off their teeth and will no longer be able to doing whatever they want in the world is about american hegemony, and not about some revisionists and, uh, about violators of the rule-based order, but stevens, so to speak, is inside the american political context. uh, and with the atmosphere that exists there, he can't do that, united states of their own volition, have turned regional regional geopolitical differences into

a decisive struggle in a decisive battle over their hegemony. yes. and i want to remind you that maybe my colleagues will not agree with me in february of this year in russia did not pose a challenge. that's so determined. the kanese hegemony, we didn't say then that it was a showdown with american non-colonialism. or e may even be more like colonialism to the united states at the end of last year and at the beginning of this year was proposed by russia is a fair deal fair agreements about not even their hegemony, but about those security interests that russia cannot compromise, the united states these agreements are very cynical. well, actually rejected. yes , they actually rejected it and decided to turn the ukrainian

crisis into a decisive battle for their hegemony, so these are not revisionists. this is pro-american uh under american hegemony. well, if such a revolution has already begun, there is no revolution of the end. well, maybe it seems to me, maybe we are not even at the beginning of this year assumed the end of american hegemony. here, its complete collapse is so close, but if they decided to arrange it, the world turned out to be ready for this decisive battle. and why did you start your program and this is a fight, now the united states is on its own with the authors of that anti-american anti-colonial anti-gimanism. an evolution that is now gaining more and more momentum in the developing non-western world. we will now break for a short commercial and continue

to talk about america. it has been decided that to deploy our nuclear missiles in cuba the first reaction was that of a bitter , broken and angry man. he just wanted to remove those missiles and offensive weapons in cuba. it is completely out of the question to announce to the whole world that the united states is starting a blockade of cuba, and the blockade is an act of war

. with an all-terrain vehicle card i explain intelligibly pay everywhere here, yes, and you get income. get an all-terrain vehicle card for free and get a 10% cashback in any grocery mail, bank, sleeplessness private wake up. you can fall asleep in 20 minutes and sleep soundly throughout the night welson bad sleep is no longer scary.

now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with credit from sovcombank make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your plans sovcombank people are more important than hands again yes again hands, it returns sale 111 on ozon only from november 11 domashniy suit for 199 rubles . hand mixer for 299 rubles. children's constructor for 149 rub. this security service is transferring money from your account. urgently tell the pin code to stop the operation. well, now it's the defender. i

interrupted the call. these are scammers. order a sim card on the tinkoff dot ru website and get the most effective protection against spam and scammers. here is one. the most delicate ice cream in exquisite chocolate icing is pure line, unrealistically delicious ice cream. the vtb team will switch from retirement to vtb, where every ten thousandth pensioner will get as much as 100,000 rubles. and every pensioner guaranteed to receive 1,000 rubles. switch to vtb and everything will work out. children need it. well, a lot for happiness is a grass and bush chopper. mud baths, designer outfit, ancient artifacts there are even more. take advantage of childbirth benefits from

the national demography project. i really need a designer glass like this. how much does beauty cost such a ruble ruble glasses for a ruble i love such promotions, collect electronic stickers and buy designer glasses at sovcombanks in two clicks on one call to make a deposit at eight and five percent per annum, sovcombank is closer to people arthroxicon three-component composition contributes to the accelerated penetration of components at the beginning of modern painkillers to the maximum concentration of arthroxicam for accelerated penetration into the focus of pain women's socks. for only 99 rubles. fix. price for everything low price what where

when the autumn series of games the final on sunday on the first in the big game big bookmaker venline general partner of the russian premier league on the air big game the scale of involvement the united states of the ukrainian conflict certainly allows us to call them the actual side of this conflict, we are talking about the supply of weapons and the united states is absolutely not going to abandon this policy. only today there was news that they are considering the possibility of supplying ukraine with e air defense systems hok, e, which are e, improved, in fact, a version of e stingers, this is the provision of coordinates for the deployment of russian e, armed forces a and

the training of military personnel and even combat planning actions. here recently. uh, the new yorker published a very long longread, a long article about how the americans and the british with some participation of the ukrainians at one of the military bases in europe, they prepared together. the plan of the ukrainian offensive in the kharkiv region, yes, how the american british military experts hacked to death the original plan for ukraine and actually created it. e. actually new from scratch, which e, then they tried to put e into practice, but recently the united states began receive signals that they allow a direct military clash. e with russia contrary to the official position of the e baitan administration. yesterday, on our program with dmitry sainz, we already

discussed, uh, the plot of the cbs channel about sending 101 airborne divisions to the united states to romania, which are called screaming eagles, and the whole plot is dedicated to the fact that they are training to fight against russia and i admit, but the possibility entry into the territory of ukraine and entry into a direct war with e russia is true, then after the release of this story on the air, the official representative of the national security council, john kirby, said that the united states still would not send its troops to ukraine despite what was said on the air, but nevertheless alexander germanovich. after all, the same broadcasts, and such stories do not just appear. yes, that's why it was and how real, and how high is the risk of a direct military clash dmitry that in my opinion, the situation is more than serious, because you know, i looked at which relay before new yorks filing for last year. somewhere in

december, the roof told the notorious breeder that the americans would never intervene in the conflict in ukraine, and they say president putin perfectly understands this and feel quite calm about this, and we are poor and unfortunate americans, we will continue, and to take the role of some kind of observer without direct intervention, without the possibility of influencing the situation somewhere, what we see. we see the present moment of a colleague, as a deputy commander, indeed, the one hundred and first airborne division of the united states of america, by the way, was quite famous eighty years ago. she was already in europe , we don’t know much about it, she was in vietnam, she was in afghanistan, she was in africa, by the way, where she covered up virus operations, and she was so famous supposedly doing a humanitarian mission, she was actually covering up a biological weapons operation, by the way, it was in ukraine that the whites were very actively involved, so that's it. uh, so the commanders said we have to. forced to actually intervene and are ready. i literally quote close to the test this night

to enter into a confrontation with russia, that's what he is forced to do in this case greetings sir, self-propelled guns abramsha, i recall the classics, because in fact the movement is that the first a-a divisions on e, so to speak , that's the theater of war. i hope, so to speak, will not enter. you fight was decided just in the month of december. that is, when the roof wrote that we are americans in no way ever interferes. they also have eighty second brigade. more precisely, so to speak, the division is also very prominent, it seems that the issue is also being resolved, and its transfers, moreover, if we return to the 101st , look how very curious the plans are. it is a strengthening of this light infantry division because it does not have a serious expression, tank companies are already coming from france, and liquor tanks, one of the best tanks in the world, are considered to be the best and very expensive to operate, whimsical, to be honest, with a lot of problems. they are only available in france. and in the air, in my opinion, as far as i remember, so to speak, sort of like saudi arabia, so it turns out that on the other side. uh, well, let's just say the borders in romania every time there is some kind of

operation in ukraine of our troops or the armed forces, they lose this situation there, it’s completely true that it’s niva, they constantly lose, maneuvering the situation anew when using polish now american romanian contingents. and including, a student of personnel of the armed forces, you also said about the military commissar, but in the sense of the military commissar of the united states of america this is extreme curious, because we are talking in particular about the hammers, which, in fact, are not an rszo system, they are a system of exactly fire exclusively in units, and the americans talk about them in hundreds, because they asked for more 500 havers, which of course will go where, well, eastern front. it may not even be an order from him for years. in the truest sense of the word, and plus to this, there is a strong pressure on the macron, probably, this is where my discourse ends, so to speak, to say forever. yes, very curious. what's what u but to paraphrase a well-known proverb, then ma on the tongue because the macron is nothing more than, in principle, a protege of american politics. so

macron, in his notorious and now famous speeches on october 13, stated that well, of course, russia is to blame for everything. she is to blame everywhere from armenia to azerbaijan to and excuse me, so to speak, ukraine, and therefore france is obliged to oppose her to fully support her older american brother. naturally. i summarize it about unfortunately, the prospects. sad war is a very profitable business. bismarck is right, at least for americans. uh, let's say trendsetters, she is war, uh, and the engine of progress and good orders. well, it burns the extra protest potential, as in the vietnam era in vietnam. sorry, the majority of the american public was categorically against the fact that the war was waged and that the vietnam war took place. well, war is not only a high profitable, but also a very risky business, especially when it comes to direct military clash of two nuclear and i really hope in the administration. they understand that even if it is not a nuclear direct military clash, there will be a

very high risk of this clash escalating to the level of a global nuclear war. this is at least understood, and cato institute research fellow, et-carpinter, listen. even if moscow uses tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, the current war, no matter how terrible it is, will remain a bilateral russian-ukrainian conflict, a us attack on russian facilities completely changes the equation such a significant escalation means a war between two major powers armed to the teeth with both tactical and strategic nuclear weapons what starts even as a limited war between two nuclear powers entails a serious risk of escalation to thermonuclear levels, leading to to armageddon. surprisingly, supposedly well- informed experts. foreign policy ca n't grasp such an important distinction , washington's current proxy war is already causing alarm, but an outright war in ukraine could be a

disaster for the american people. here, and ted carpenter, he is wrong only in one assumption that russia can use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine in everything else, he is absolutely right, but, but in fact, the risk of uh nuclear esca exists, but it is not connected with russia, and it is connected with ukraine's plans to produce and use a dirty bomb on the territory of its own country. uh, russia is just here at all levels about this, but it says, uh, western counterparty curator of ukraine, but we see what kind of answer we received, just a reply, yes a formal reply that, like, we know that you are lying, in fact you are trying to cover up the plans. your own plans. uh, the use of, e, tactical nuclear weapons even today, just the press secretary of the president of russia dmitry peskov , has already stated that such an approach is simply unacceptable, simply not permissible, and

russian ambassador to the united nations vasily nebenzya wrote a letter to the secretary general. he a, in which he stated that moscow would regard the use of a dirty bomb by kiev as an act of nuclear terrorism. and by the way, a meeting of the security council is to take place today. dedicated to this topic, you also have a question from alexander germanovich. well, here, is it really that the west does not understand that this act of nuclear terrorism, but will become pandora's box in the first place. uh, a monstrous escalation of the military conflict in ukraine with unpredictable consequences, eh. secondly, the nuclear taboo that has existed for 77 years will be broken, and that's it. after this already the world will become different nuclear weapons will become applicable. i would say that in this case we are dealing with a war of doctrine. and the fact that the united states of america professed and i am at war. of course they are at home. this is the so-called uh, the doctrine of the limited use of nuclear weapons

through a state blotter or whatever padding, that is, well, there would seem to be no direct conflict. but there is a provocation, that is, well, someone will use, so to speak, tactical nuclear weapons. they say tactical earthly weapons already was used and we are well aware of it many times, in particular the territory of the former in 2009, of course, it brought certain consequences, but nothing more than the use of the irrigation factor in vietnam , that is, yes, there were genetic abnormalities in children who were born after a very limited local, so to speak. i say now, of course, on behalf of those who decide such monstrous things, therefore, regarding the use of tyao, at least what is said, as i understand it by the ukrainian politician and with what they obviously accordingly, pretending that they do not understand, what they are talking about, so to speak, so to speak, but in fact it implies and it seems to me that this is exactly what it is. uh, matryoshka is one game in another game, what they want is something and it seems to me that misha plays the main role here, uh, referring to a certain meeting that took place in august between the head of military intelligence, and nato countries were swallowed up by

six doctrines using dirty bombs. well , the ukrainians were told that it would not be dirty, but there would be tactical nuclear weapons that would be decommissioned against russia and then it will turn into a fucking pariah with all the ethical consequences that we already know very well. and of course, the position of russia is important because this is a deep probe of the desire to pogmat. and these are the calls that took place through our ministry of defense with the leading countries, so to speak. and so to speak from and to including france and so on, but he says what these calls say that russia will not allow and we know that russia clearly answered how it would react to this and here. i think how since everyone was thinking, because they did not expect that we would reveal this situation and the former were ready to react in some way, how to react? well, i, uh, as they say, i will not carefully assume impossible scenarios, but since there is a certain act that is not signed, which is attributed to russia. and as uh , one of our very large, so to speak,

political observers said. this game can be played by two. you never know where what acts can still take place nobody knows. let's think about where and how. well, i hope that russian signals still, some hotheads back in the west will come to their senses, but in any case, it is obvious that already the very discourse on the possibility of using nuclear weapons, and immerses us, more precisely, opens up a new nuclear age for us, that is, in any case, we are entering a certain new era in a certain new a state where the risk of using nuclear weapons is much higher. than it's been throughout. eh, the last many decades and about this. it seems to me that a very authoritative american writes quite correctly. e. international expert president of the council for international relations richard hass, listen the question now is whether we are on the cusp of a new era of building up nuclear arsenals in a more

prominent role in the geopolitics of more countries ' efforts to acquire them. its use disappears with the passage of time, as well as with the advent of a new generation, the so-called tactical nuclear weapons, which involve less destruction and research. looks more applicable for a long time, many political scientists believed that the nuclear issue is a relic of the cold war. actually. the world is approaching an era that can be further marked by nuclear weapons. here it is only worth adding that the united states itself made a very big contribution, and in c. the beginning of this new nuclear age, because they were the ones who destroyed the arms control treaties. it was they who created the so-called. on low-power weapons and installing them on strategic carriers and they said in plain text that it was a usable

nuclear weapon. this is a nuclear weapon that can be used in combat not just, so to speak, as a deterrent, but as a weapon of war. well , actually, what they wanted, or even got, but , uh, if e yes, well, you can have one turnip, i would continue the thought and say that, in fact, everything is opened, we say that when a conflict occurs on the territory of ukraine but the authors are americans. yes, therefore, the goals are the ultimate goal of resolving the conflict, not ukraine is america if we are talking about dirty weapons on a dirty nuclear bomb in ukraine, well, what is there to doubt, it was not in vain that calls were made not to ukraine, but to those countries that are the authors of this idea. and just these calls showed that we see where the real threat is actually hidden, and it seems to me that i don’t interfere. on deeds there is someone to think about it, but the sooner the west especially americans realize that they have become a real target of possible

actions without much restrictions, when they realize that the threat is a destructive threat in relation to they are not guaranteed either by the ocean or by a protective cap by anything else, but by the presence of just what the instinct of self-preservation can achieve here. and i think that the main thing here in this fact is that we opened up in a timely manner and indicated the target and they were worried. they realized that they would not play. uh, a nod towards ukraine is not a problem there. the problem is there, and we see it, and we will respond there. i completely agree with you, only fear for one's own safety, only the instinct of self-preservation will make it possible to achieve a change in american policy in a more responsible party. and what is happening now, perhaps, is a step in this direction. but here's where else the escalation is actually happening, er, and constantly raising the

escalation bar. this is american domestic politics. 2 weeks left exactly two weeks before the midterm congressional elections, and the situation there every day more and more resembles a political civil war, which is being fought to destroy, and political opponents. here is hillary clinton who remains one of the leaders of e democratic party scares e plans. and as she said far-right extremists. it's about the republican party stealing you 24 and illegally seizing power. listen to her statement, far-right extremists are planning literally. steal the next presidential election and do not hide it, controlled by rights. the supreme court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures the power to overrule votes if that happens

in the 2024 presidential election, it could be adopted not by popular vote and not even her chronic colleagues and electors, but by the legislatures of the states, many of which are controlled by the republicans, but despite this real threat to democracy. the good news is that the united have already begun to suppress the coup d'état, helping us defend democracy in 2024. they compiled a list of the most important elections in six key states. this is the discourse of war. this is not a discourse, just political competition, what hillary clinton says. what words she uses, this is the discourse of war and indeed. well, there's practically nothing left in common between democrats and republicans. here, as the results of a recent opinion poll showed, and the parties are united, the voters of the two parties are united only in one thing only in their hatred for each other. and in

everything else they are completely different. uh, the priorities of the democrats, what concerns the threats to democracy from the republicans, the right to abortion, the cost of living crisis and climate change, by the way, ukraine has no republicans here, what concerns jobs and the economy, migration issues issues of border security, by the way, ukraine is not here either, and at the same time, here's a question. will another party's agenda destroy america good question. yes, will another party's agenda destroy america in the affirmative to this question? 81% of republicans and uh, oh i'm sorry 81% of democrats and 79% of republicans are the same numbers you know i. i have been following this internal war for many years , moreover, it seemed to me for a long time that i was living in the conditions of the civil war when i lived in the usa

because you are absolutely right in rhetoric. that's what hillary she's the only one who didn't say they were fascists and neo-fascists. well, in general, biden said this, but she did. know that and i think who really stole the election? 1920, i don't doubt it at all, because i followed all these things so closely and closely. i've read stuff that said these big big tech tech companies, like google i don't know, uh, facebook, facebook, there and stuff, they're all involved in the

electoral process. uh-huh i mean those people who would never go to vote, would never register, and according to some estimates, which i have had the opportunity to see, 12 million, at least 12 million. these were people who received ballots, who were helped to fill out these ballots, who were helped to send these ballots by mail. and they decided the fate, but it cannot be. this is absolutely nonsense, a barely alive biden who has been sitting in a bunker all his life, as they say, so that he mobilizes more than eighty million, that is, an unheard of figure in history american elections. well, why is it suddenly such a number of people, and showed up to

vote for him? well, that's a plus. i'm not talking about the fact that it has again become relevant in republican and commentators and politicians, that soon the whole cemetery will again vote for democratic candidates, because they really have the technical capabilities. these techno giants. they have an unlimited amount of money and an unlimited number of people. and who they can hire to actually do the work, but i think that dmitry apparently missed one thing. well, you listed a lot. one of the most important questions that the republicans have raised today. and where? of course, the democrats were very much set up. this is the destruction of children

, the destruction of their gender characteristics, this is at an early age of kostration. it is at an early age without parental consent to change sex. this is sex education. it generally turns into a school in pedophilia. and it's these monstrous things. that is, today they say, today i watched here's a new one gubernatorial candidates gubernatorial region, here are 20 years old. she has been in journalistic brilliant everywhere democratic candidates, if there is an opportunity to avoid direct debate, because they can not argue with the questions that are put before them. leave the family in order. leave the kids okay. do not touch. here you are destroying.

it seems to me that the foundations of american culture will come back to haunt the democrats , but ivan alekseevich is in a state of political civil war, yes, but january 3 will enter a period of simple domestic political paralysis. and the fact is that e can be an internal political paralysis. this may affect the budget process , uh, ordinary citizens will suffer, and so on, but we should not forget about such an element as the deep state, which will be funded by presidential decrees in accordance with budget figures, focusing on the budget figures of the previous year and from the deep state won't stop working, it will continue to pursue the same policy, moreover,

a political crisis. it encourages politicians to care less about the deep state than more. this is a pack, the more elements of disagreements of the civil war and so on, the less attention and less control the deep state, which makes up such a bunch of global financial circles of the military-industrial complex uh, foreign policy specialists military intelligence uh and so on, but i would like to , uh, pay attention to this. here on what we said earlier in our program is that uh leftist democrats are progressives, as they call them in america peace parties, but here is the agenda that was listed, uh, s in relation to traditional values. that's all. these innovations are

the agenda, which, first of all, is supported by just. uh, just a progressive, so ah yes , they really uh, often oppose uh, wars. although you know, not really, too, they protested against iraq for the first time today. well , it's more of a faction that sliger's law is to everything was cleaned up, everyone was silent and only with cultures. yes, that is, you know, here, i specified. yes, they may be often against it. so that america waved, uh, a cudgel, they are just for the fact that the concentration camp was under uh, that's according to their agenda, yes, built in accordance with their uh, with their agenda, therefore, uh, such a peace party is conditional, but we do not mind a camp inside the usa for god's sake, but the fact is that all these