his intention is to produce and use the so-called dirty bomb in ukraine, which can lead to really catastrophic consequences up to the third world war. not to mention the disruption of the nuclear taboo and the deaths of tens of thousands of people, but today information appeared that the kiev regime had already completed technical preparations for a provocation with a dirty bomb, in this regard, russia continued to sound the alarm today, and about these plans of the kiev regime, sergei shoigu held relevant negotiations with the ministers of defense china and india and this night, at the request of russia , a special meeting of the un security council was held and, according to the deputy permanent representative of russia in this organization, dmitry polyansky , russia managed to raise awareness of the members of the security council and pass on relevant intelligence information to them. hear what dmitry polyansky said we are quite satisfied with the meeting because we have raised the level of awareness. i don't mind people saying that

russia is screaming wolf if that doesn't happen, because it's a terrible terrible disaster, potentially threatening the whole earth. however, the west does not intend to change its position yet, and this is how the deputy ambassador of great britain he james, smelts, reacted to the arguments and intelligence information transmitted by russia immediately after the same meeting of the security council. listen. they saw and did not hear any new evidence at this private meeting of ministers . great britain france united states it was made clear that this is a frankly false accusation that we hear from the russian federation in the direction of ukraine which has nothing hide. this is a waste of our time and disinformation that we have seen many times, and this must stop, and today nato secretary general ens stoltenberg directly accused russia of intending to use tactical nuclear weapons in ukraine, hiding behind the ukrainian dirty bomb story. hear that ukraine

is preparing to detonate a dirty bomb on its territory. nato allies reject. this blatantly false accusation of russia often blames others for what it is about to do itself, we have already seen similar ones in syria and now in ukraine russia should not use false pretexts for further escalation. but the west is not what, kiev is just desperately trying to embed nato no longer in a hybrid, but in a direct war with russia that this is the goal, this is a political motivation, that if kiev succeeds in provoking nato into a direct military clash with russia, what will really begin uncontrolled escalation up to the third world war, and the first moment, from my point of view, those exercises that were carried out today by the strategic nuclear forces of all three components, e strategic nuclear forces. they, uh, must return

the united states to, uh, the field of nuclear deterrence, because the united states began to experiment and reached the point, apparently, together with the kiev regime, to experiments. uh, with either a dirty bomb or a tactical bomb. in general, some kind of nuclear, uh, nuclear provocation, and this is a clear demonstration that everything, uh, there is nothing to seriously experiment here. everything is known. uh, this is a return to nuclear to nuclear deterrence, as for stoltenberg's statement, well, by apparently, he just had a package opened, i don’t know, there was a package for him yesterday. yes, what do i need to raise, what statements to act the provocation has begun? yes, apparently, he was released until he was given. he is clearly leading to the fact that this is not a ukrainian pravocatsiya. rather. by the way, he does not deny that

this is ukrainian, maybe a provocation. he simply says that in return russia has real tactical nuclear weapons. here, apparently, he was supposed to be throwing one of some house checkers. and here's some mean, uh, extra additional version. well, that is, he simply works out some kind of program that he was given to him. i wouldn't pay much attention to the statement, but here's what the, er, the british representative said. this is very interesting, because the world is truly faced with a choice. in general, a nuclear catastrophe is possible. here's someone lying. we have 30 years previous history. after the end of the cold war, some have doubts who lied to powell in the midst of security with a test tube proving what it means right here real. hooray, there or something, he showed, yes,

from iraq. and there is also uranus. and in general, it means nuclear weapons and so on. that is, and the world must decide not in vain this issue was submitted to the united nations for e, the court, so to speak, well, not for the court yet, but in the literal sense of the word, but for some review of the world e of the world community. you understand that they lied, they played, and that's all, it can be very bad, but it will end badly from my point of view. well, it’s clear what the world solution will be, another question is how active the world community is, probably not openly, but through various levers in various contacts, the overplayed western elites will begin to pull, that, well, are you crazy for your lies, that we will have a world catastrophe because of

your lies, but this, of course, i would say that they, of course, deny everything, but apparently. uh, now we're coming to some kind of decisive moment that the cards are hidden. will they go for another uh, such a new wave of lies, and uh and escalations will continue this provocation, or will it stop. i think it's big the likelihood that it becomes. at least, i see that they have some confusion because because they are used to that here lies pass. uh, they just pass and even those who understand that this is a lie cannot do anything. now the situation is very unusual for them, because even though the doors are closed in the united nations, they have actually been brought to

the surface, not publicly yet. i hope the fear returns, uh self-preservation instinct, because here you know after yes after the end cold war. uh, it seemed to us, at least to many of us, that the disappearance of the fear of nuclear war. it's good. but now, when i listen to such statements from toltenberg or, uh, james koriuki, uh, british diplomat? it seems to me that, on the contrary, the disappearance of that fear is very bad, because it was the disappearance of that fear of nuclear war that led to that monstrous irresponsibility that he continues to demonstrate until today . all these 30 years after graduation the cold war, and continues to demonstrate it, it is this disappearance of fear that has led to the complete erasure of the boundaries of what is permitted, when the west, in full conviction that nothing terrible will happen, is moving towards disaster. that's exactly what, by the way,

uh says in an interview with fox news uh, retired american colonel daniel davis listen to a very interesting statement. when i served, everyone understood perfectly well that this is what we must avoid at all costs. this is the whole point of the idea of ​​mutually assured destruction. it doesn't matter if there was talk hateful advice or about the united states which was then violently opposed to each other by our governments and we all understood where not to go. and it provided security for everyone, but now we are like everything, somehow we have lost it. they say we will help ukraine no matter what it takes and how long it takes, if biden succeeds in this, then for us the romans will be higher and we simply cannot go down this path in ukraine there is nothing that is worth losing one american city. here's what davis thinks had to be avoided at all costs. this is a direct military clash between the soviet union and the united states, nikolai yuryevich, here. do you think they

understand that the loss of one or many american cities is really not worth it, ukraine or they think that, uh, nothing bad will happen, that they will manage to keep the hybrid war of the hybrid no escalation there will be no dirty bomb. there won't be any direct military confrontation, so you can move, uh, the way they're going now. i think, that if you squeeze all their rhetoric and leave it aside, then they tend to retain the possibility of escalation, to retain the possibility of threatening escalation. and from this point of view, almost literally. no, not almost, just literally zelensky’s calls for military intervention by nato countries, up to calls for a preventive nuclear strike on russia, and this is part of this game of escalation. they uh

collided. uh, they faced that russia has the opportunity to escalate the opportunity step up their efforts in ukraine more than they want to retain the ability to frighten us with their interference, and they expect their control of the media to be their control. over how international events in the world are discussed. e gives them such an opportunity, and they rely on the fact that, as ivan alekseevich rightly noted, love is a lie, it will work, therefore it’s very correct, then how loudly russia speaks about this threat, because what is a nuclear provocation in ukraine, this is the very occasion. for nato the united states is a reason to escalate. that's what this is for and, uh, well, it remains to be hoped

that the world has changed and there is no such thing in the world anymore, and the ideological dominance of the united states as it was before and that they will have to stop such games? well, uh, they really need it. it seems to me to understand that this is an escalation that they are counting on if a provocation with a dirty bomb really takes place in ukraine. she will not be limited to the media sphere, and she will begin to wear an uncontrolled character that can really end. uh, the third world war and a full-scale nuclear war is no longer local, but global and in fact. here are some politicians in those countries that will become the direct theater of war . in the event that this is an escalation, that is, a military clash between russia and nato, they begin to understand this, i mean romania here,

uh. we have already discussed at this table that the united states recently deployed to romania a 101st airborne division, the so-called screaming eagles. it is called and it is deployed 5 km from the ukrainian border. and so, uh, the activity of this uh, 101 division is not even hiding that it is aimed at entering the territory of ukraine in which case and engaging in direct combat with direct military clashes with russia, and that's how this scenario and uh, similar in general, the situation is described by one of the romanian senators. and diana usa to listen let's go again. just understand that this country is not yours, it is ours and we the people decide what should happen, don't let any us 101 or any other division escalate the conflict

which is not between russia and nato but between russia and ukraine outside the territory that used to belong to russia and it's their business what they do there is not a problem romania's nato or the european union are two countries that are neither in the eu nor in nato so what you want to do, including nato and our stupid leaders answering orders is an act of treason against romania and believe me, if you dare to drag romania into the war. we'll put you in jail for treason. nikolai viktorovich is starting to reach some, at least politicians, but it’s nice that there are voices of common sense in romania, but i would like to remind you that quite recently the romanian minister of defense was removed from his post for calling for peace negotiations. that is, there is still a political skating rink, it somehow goes on. maybe this lady was not yet in focus, maybe her uh,

the format is different or the weight is not so big, but still less. she said very serious things. strictly speaking, to plant for high treason. this, by the way, is the same president yuhanis, who removed from office the minister of defense, who advocated the need for a russian-american deal, of course, but i would also add the situation in moldova here and let's not forget that the presence of the american division it is also intended to influence and on the internal political process of moldova, where it is no secret that my sandu is in the same way under the direct patronage of the americans. ambassador as ukrainian government is under the patronage of its, so to speak , american ambassador, and romania is also, well, practically devoid of state sovereignty , and the likelihood of romania and moldova sliding into conflict in one form or another is very, very high, but still, i’ll probably join dear colleague hmm i guess the west doesn't want a full scale war with russia i guess

uh of course you can't be 100% sure of that and you need to make all the necessary preparations in case things go out of control but i think this the peeping game the stakes are going up all the time going up all the time going up. and whoever blinks first, and the military diplomatic explosion of the nord stream and other other arguments are put on the table, while for those who are on the geopolitics playing table, defeat is very, very fatal. yeah, that's why the united states of america can't afford to blink either, and that's why they're preparing a provocation not to hmm, i guess, hit russia in retaliation. and in order to deal a colossal blow information about russia in order to use a dirty bomb from the kiev

regime, try to break, the existing diplomatic successes of russia, all associations, all trade developments, that is, well, you see, in peacetime they used nuclear weapons and so on and so forth, that is, they are being created such a global provocation for global information consequences, but i do not exclude that somewhere there are some troops. well, most likely not their own, but polish romanian in moldovan uniform. as they say, why use your american division? in front of american voters hmm for the possible death of soldiers, if there is a polish army, if there is an army , then there are many tools created that are paid for by the americans. well, they must be used somehow, in the end, then there will be no questions. why are you spending big money on this. well, here, i completely agree with your metaphor about the game of flying. but the history of international relations shows that the

great powers do not always want to start a world war. they really play. at getelke. they really raise the stakes. they proceed from the fact that they take rational, meaningful and controlled steps at each stage of this escalation, and then pooh and somehow here, by chance, it turns out, a world war. you see , here is the risk. it seems to me that now lies precisely in this, that playing such peepers. the west can pass through when it crosses that very line, right? from playing uh to a really direct military confrontation, but so far the white house doesn't really share these risks. and at least at least they pretend that they do not share them, but in a biden administration. today they again stated that the decision on the possible start of negotiations with russia should be taken by kiev and not by washington,

but nevertheless, in the united states today it continues to be very actively discussed. uh, the story of the letter from thirty, uh, left-wing congressmen of the progressive democratic party, demanding that urgent russian-american negotiations on a political and diplomatic settlement be started, ukrainian conflict. and while these e this group of democrats. uh, they quickly crushed and they withdrew their letter yesterday, nevertheless. there was a very big resonance. the very fact of the appearance of this letter from the democrats. the very fact that the left wing of the democratic party for the first time since the end of the cold war. decided on a foreign policy agenda that differs from the mainstream foreign policy agenda of the democratic party and the democratic white house, and the very fact that this is the position that they have designated the anti-war position resonated with

what the republicans are saying, and in the house of representatives about the need for cutbacks, and the allocation of money to ukraine has all had an effect. uh, the exploding bomb. and here is how the sen channel writes about it. there is no sign that the $18bn flow of us military aid that helped ukraine fend off russia is in jeopardy, but in the 2 weeks before the november midterms, the growing opposition, the growing us role in the war, is growing in both parties sooner or later disputes washington about about how long the us should continue to arm ukraine and how much it would cost to hit on critical issues that could decide the outcome of the war, and the washington post goes even further and writes that if the united states does blink inward for political reasons for foreign policy reasons, but if they

reduce support for ukraine, then the european countries will also crumble, that without the leading guiding role of the united states of america, the collective west is not capable of anything at all, and they're basically going to fall apart, look, it's unclear if the republicans will follow through on their threat to cut funding to ukraine if they take control of the house of representatives, but the mere suggestion that the us might cut funding has raised alarms in european capitals, even if the allies are in europe. will try to make up for the cut in american aid, it is not clear if they can do this, the size of america's military obligations exceeds the capabilities of any of its western allies, the requests are huge and may become more and more burdensome. as winter approaches. and perhaps a recession is where american leadership is vital, tobias elwood, a british mp, said. when america takes a step forward, other countries follow suit, the scale of both financial and

military support from the united states is off the charts compared to other countries. but if america begins to choke it, then other countries will do the same, he said, vladimir alekseevich you agree that without this leader here. the managerial role of the united states, the european countries themselves will indeed very quickly stop supporting ukraine and will not be able to provide it at all. and life support, well, the leading guiding role. uh, the united states of america is weakening and it is obviously weakening all over the world, along with this, the balance changes and once a certain period of time there is a restructuring of international relations. this is exactly what we are seeing today. this is the first second of course, without uh, the leading and guiding role of the united states america most of the european countries would not act the way the europeans do today. in fact, they submitted to the will of the united states of america, the danger of the current moment of transition from one system of international relations

to another lies in the very unpredictable escalation as a result of the game of peering. because it was like this, i absolutely agree that this was said and repeatedly in history, who assumed the number of contradictions accumulated and as a result, because of one small checker, arose world wars. the first world war is exactly in this regard, it is very important to understand, uh, such two factors the first factor, the united states of america , uh, are going to very reckless escalation actions. uh, it's not about strength. it speaks of weakness. it's on one side on the other side. these reckless escalatory actions could undermine everyone and everything. and this is a very big risk from a third party. unfortunately, western partners have ceased to understand and realize the actions of

russia's inaction, our actions, which are reasonable thoughtful balanced character in the west is perceived as a weakness. and this is the biggest danger, because our strength is perceived as weakness, our restraint and responsibility regarding the system of international relations is perceived. unfortunately, as a weakness, and this leads to very high risks in terms of traps that western partners can fall into. they do n’t understand us, they forgot how or don’t want to understand, and these are very big risks in terms of escalation, not about ukraine, but about the whole system international relations risks. these are also in the fact that the americans do not understand their other partners. whether it's china or india or the turkish republic. saudi arabia americans have ceased to hear and understand, they proceed from the fact that there is a dominant position. eh, american, so to speak

, parties in the broadest sense of the word in the world game. but this is far from absolute. and here i completely agree with you about something reluctance. the west does indeed accept russian red lines. as red lines. and uh, when russia is not declares war on them, uh, if these red lines are violated, they perceive it as weakness. in fact, russia is acting like a responsible great power. but sooner or later it really can stop, for i think that we have already come to this brink. but what about europeans? here's what they won't be able to do, but to maintain the current level of support for ukraine even without relatively, the leading guiding roles of the united states admitted this yesterday, and the former secretary of state of the united states they are not the special representative of the president of the united states for climate john kerry which is great. i think to the disappointment of e biden, he also wrote himself down as a peacemaker and supporters of a political and diplomatic

settlement of the ukrainian conflict. here's what former secretary of state kerry said to the council on foreign relations yesterday. i hope that this war will not have a next year, and it seems to me quite obvious that the only way to end this conflict is some kind of negotiated solution. this conflict has enormous destructive potential, which is especially great when it comes to the next family in europe, and even more than compared to this winter this year. they filled up their stocks. well, uh john kerry means that uh next year u european countries, in principle, will not be able to fill their gas storage, and therefore they will be forced, uh, to change their policy, but ivan alekseevich is generally remarkable. yes, that a high-ranking official of the biden administration, spoke of the need for peace and spoke of the fact that it is not permissible to continue this war

next year. according to a. the same question for you occasion, and the opinion of the washington post is that everything will fall apart in the kingdom of denmark. i mean in the west in the collective west, if all of a sudden the neon states blink after the midterms. that's right, that is, uh europeans . uh, like rats, so, uh, fairy tales. yes, for this pipe. come on, here, uh, for this and an american pipe. in this case, of course they go. uh, well, they suffer a lot. we talked about this a lot, that if, uh, ukraine is a geopolitical suicide bomber, then europe is a geo economically. uh, suicide bomber europe brings the same, uh, sacrifice, so it's absolutely europeans for sure. they themselves will not pull any game, another thing, what they

will do, if suddenly the american fishing rod falls silent. that's what they will do, and not to them, that reason and will will immediately return to the current transatlantic politicians. most likely no. uh, a change of position is real, perhaps only through election campaigns, change, and change of the elites. and here is what concerns all these american statements. here i have to say e dmitry vyacheslavovich, what i still see is a little different in this, but you put it in such a line that they begin to realize something there, apparently from fear. yes, they got scared and something spoke, either the instinct of self-preservation, or some kind of e, twisted for stirring up the current teaching of the teaching of thunder. yes, and uh, testing the use of a strategic nuclear strike too. well, at least it reminds the united states to tell us that this certainly

confuses them. they understand that the ops ca n't go there, but still we are now in the period, a for two for 2 weeks. well that's when the 2 weeks before the election starts. america - you can't trust anything in america. uh, and you repeatedly dimitri simes. spoke in your in your program. they promise to vilify each other. here is anything. this is already such a fight for 2 weeks before the elections, that there are no words any more important people for these words spoken during the period. here are 2 weeks before the election never answer. it's just an american tradition. this is the last felling before the elections, as far as statements. here are these thirty uh, thirty, then uh, from my point of view, everything here is the situation. next , they saw that the republicans are part of the republicans, here, the a element of the ukrainian campaign is doing

its own election campaign and, uh, uh, now there is a struggle, so to speak, not just between the democratic party and the republican party, but especially let's say the trumpists. of the democrats and the defeatists in their own party, but these leftists, the democrats, they are also fighting with the republicans. especially with trumpists and with e part of their own democratic party. and oddly enough, the trumpists, and these left-wing democrats. to some extent they are fighting for the same voters, especially in terms of the youth, and therefore, when one said republicans. we will save money for the americans. these leftists. here comes the moment. this is how they steal our votes. they will steal votes from us, and they also have the idea that they will deceive us, because we will lose with our more moderate democrats. our democrats will not mind if we

they didn’t perform very well, so they just ran so that the trumpists, first of all, would not take away their votes from them, but you see, in the party for a nut, it works better than in the republican, they are right there, uh, that means their own trump. yes, they were immediately whipped there, so this is purely pre-election from my point of view. i cannot for the time being bet on the fact that a peace party has emerged on the ice wing of the democratic party, until now, i cannot talk about it. and as for kerry from my point of view. this is, uh, career application for the other half of the administration. eh, baidana, and the man speaks. just remember how, under obama, obama is now an authority, everyone loves him, like critical guys. remember how i did everything preobami . and now for 2 years you wanted nothing to

return obama's legacy yes, after that, as you say, bad trump, but you couldn't do anything . and who did it under obama? so here i am , and agreed on syria. i mean, i negotiated the nuclear deal, in general. i say i can negotiate from my point of view. it's uh, also in to some extent, the election thing is self-promotion self-promotion, and such a career application for the second half of the biden administration, until this is a revision. here are serious political positions, let's see, it seems to me that i agree that this has not yet been revised. i agree that so far there is no established peace faction in the democratic party, but after the midterm elections, the congress if more progressive democrats come to the house of representatives on the one hand and more of these

republicans, which kevin mccarthy reflects a well, then the quantity can develop into quality and changes will begin to occur, we'll see. we are now for a small advertisement for you, and then we will talk about the us policy in the caucasus. she was taken to moscow like a prisoner, fearing a conspiracy, no one was allowed to see her at the age of 17, a widow without a home, without money , without a person to rely on. yesterday she was a duchess, without a dukedom, for many years she suffered the need for everything dependent on strangers , and today she was offered the imperial crown. yes, they were going to make her a pawn in someone else's game, but the russian princess believed when she returned to

her homeland. she can take care of herself. why wouldn't it be worth it, anna ioannovna empire premiered on november 4 at the first, she did not believe. can she now breathe freely and arrange life on her own, these hopes collapsed overnight. absolutely everything for your beauty in a mobile application, cleaning discs for 649 rubles. a glove for 3.990 dishwashing tablets for 249 and even an irrigator for 2.190 absolutely everything for your beauty and not only in the l'etoile app

this is an advertisement for the drug kagocel without exaggeration and double meanings. after all, from the first day of taking it, it begins to reduce the severity of symptoms of influenza and sars, regardless of the type of virus, and helps to reduce the duration of the disease, therefore kagocel is the highest antiviral measure. and this kagocel packaging you easily. you can find them at the pharmacy. offers its own conditions for mortgage insurance. compare will help not to overpay, buy or extend mortgage insurance with savings of up to 4,000 rubles. one of the ten largest insurance companies

on the website or app. if insurance, then compare choose the best travel around russia book accommodation on the site daily.ru apartments hotels guest houses at affordable prices 150,000 options for every taste. and a super cashback of 30%. even with daily use of shampoo, dandruff can return again. it didn’t kill not just washing off dandruff, but it affects the cause of its appearance, the fungus. opt for treatment nizoral helps reduce flaking and itching fights the cause of dandruff boredom. ozone only from november 11 siberian for 129 rubles. xiaomi smartphone for 6.99 rubles. on board a frying pan to mara for 999 rubles. something with a terminal with a pocket

dilemma in technology suddenly burned out a microcircuit with a credit card from rosbank this is not a problem when buying. shoot. transfer 120 days without interest and the fuss of rosbank real opportunities are unrealistic, delicious ice cream madness is often lived. you can fall asleep in 20 minutes and sleep soundly throughout the night wellson bad sleep no longer scares you on october 28-29 in the toy coffee discount feed. vtbeyte to switch from pension to vtb where everyone ten thousandth pensioner will receive as much as 100,000 rubles. and each pensioner is guaranteed to receive

1,000 rubles. switch to vtb and that's it, you will get the right choice for millions of women. one tablet in the morning two components, three actions protects blood vessels reduces capillary fragility increases the tone of vengenarus. just like one two three. what where when is the autumn series of games the final on sunday at the first in the big game big bookmaker greenline general partner of the russian premier league? on the air is a big game i speak today in front of heads of law enforcement agencies and intelligence agencies of the cis countries, and vladimir putin paid special attention to the destabilizing role in the united states in the

post -soviet space. those who do this, we see on the example of ukraine that the country has actually become an instrument of american foreign policy lost sovereignty and is directly controlled by the united states, which uses it as a battering ram against russia against our union state with the republic, belarus yes, and against the csto. the cis as a whole, while clearly showing the true relationship of the states with its satellite. almost immediately, the ukrainian territory was turned into a testing ground for military biological experiments, and now they are pumping up weapons, including heavy weapons, they ignore the statement of the kiev kiev regime about the desire to get nuclear

weapons. after all, it was said publicly from the side kyiv authorities. there is no talk about it, everyone is silent about the plans to use the so-called dirty bomb for provocation. well, one of the main objects of this destabilizing us policy in the post-soviet space is the transcaucasus, where the united states wants to move russia, uh, from the peacekeeping role that it plays in the nagorno-karabakh conflict , to impose a treaty on armenia, and in accordance with which in no way will the rights of armenians, uh, living in the territory of nagorny karabakh and prerequisites will be created up to the withdrawal of russian peacekeepers and the conflict zone, and even the withdrawal of armenia from e, the csto. and russia , of course, seeks to prevent this. and today it became known that vladimir putin invited not kol pashinyan, prime minister of armenia ilham aliyev, but the president of azerbaijan

, to russia and a trilateral summit will be held on october 31 in sochi and everyone has already confirmed their participation in everything. here you expect some progress in the positive. full on the results of this summit and whether it will be possible to convince the armenian leadership of the perniciousness of what they are offered from washington you know, i would like to say terribly, yes, but, frankly, i'm not sure about this, because since the eighteenth year everyone knows. yes, in fact, since the eighteenth year of 20 years, everyone knows the political biography of pashinyan and his supporters. he himself never hid it, so these people all worked for foreign grants . well, these sheds,

they multiplied there in a huge number of foreign western npos had an unmeasured number of questions in general about the survival of the country, but security. and the survival of nations. in particular, ethnic armenians who live in mountainous karabakh, because for the united states, the survival of armenia and the preservation of the lives of these people is not of high value, and they are a pawn for them. and so, uh, it seems to me that here it is necessary to talk e not only about what should be with whom, armenia with russia or uh. with the west in the end, well armenia is a sovereign state, but uh, if armenia accepts those conditions, which are now being offered to it by the united states, then it will lose many people, and it will also create the prerequisites for a very serious further aggravation of its security, because

turkey azerbaijan the united states without the participation of russia without the presence of russia will not ensure the security of armenia, but you know me about this. uh, no need to tell, because all my life i myself write explaining and talking about it, but the fact is that i talked to many military men and the military said that, in fact, necessary help and support, even during the war came. but people were in a depressed state and the line of argument that turkey and the west had been pushing and pursuing for many years prevailed. turkey said, you hear you lived well for hundreds of years for several hundred years, while armenia was divided between iran 1,500, if

i'm not mistaken in 1915 armenians lived well in the ottoman empire. this is not how they really lived, both economically and culturally in many other respects, but when the wave of national liberation movements began in the balkans in in the arab world and so on, everyone took this path, and they say that until the 19th century, until the first half , everything was fine, as soon as you announced that you also want autonomies. you also want to stand out and even began to look towards russia, we realized that this was the start of the collapse of the turkish empire. the fact is, here we have zircolov here can confirm. eh, a ton, very interesting, he has a job, just about these er, well, firstly, 94-96 years 2008. and he

says, yes, of course, he says a big problem. why but this is his explanation, of course in toynbe, well, as a philosopher, history and so on. he says, the fact is that both ethnic groups claim the same territories in eastern anatolia, but the truth is that the armenians lived and formed there for thousands of years, and the serdyuki turks came. as a matter of fact, the famous mansekett battle, when byzantium in 71 ad was defeated by the emperor roman, was also used, so he was captured. yes, well, it’s true, then they bought it out, there and so on. that is, these are aliens, but when you speak, it is already the xii century, but it has been for many years passed. well, let's say not like that, the aliens are not such

namadas, there and so on, but all the same, of course, they really understood, and even now i had conversations with turkish specialists. the most brilliant diplomats, ildar turkmen, are the minister of foreign affairs, who spoke about his meetings with a loud speaker when he was ambassador in moscow , samberg, the famous diplomat ambassador in london, gundu for oktan, who was in the nationalist newspapers , wrote was the ambassador in different ones. of course, they spoke, but the nationalist moods. we say how it's a nightmare to think about if the seversky treaty would have been realized pieces of historical armenia, but

still it was more than 100,000 square kilometers. this, by the way. they are an outstanding medieval monument, which mar orbeli was engaged in. well, that is, it's amazing. this pearl was simply said that there were thousands of churches in this city and 100,000 population while in europe at that time. well, there were some villages next to it, these are the largest cities. but then again, why, because they had such a logic, we all lost in the arab world, well, they have the same ends of the turkish empire. the mediterranean was an inland sea. it is clear we lost was, and now also

eastern anatolia and russia here. well, alas, if it hadn’t been like the october revolution, if the army hadn’t been decomposed, it would all have been, well, in general, uh. angel russian agreements were in post-war armenia and in fact, it clearly spoke of the restoration of the armenian state, but the russians spoke. well, it is necessary, probably, the kingdom, maybe even under sovereignty. uh, well, the british spoke of the russian tsar, maybe the republic, but in general, this was seriously discussed. and by the way, russia has never lost a single battle in the caucasian fract, i agree, yes, well, there, regarding the serbian treaty, there is still a turk, he tried and made it impossible to implement it. here, and vladimir

alekseevich really, and recently a historic meeting took place in prague. the example of armenian minister pashinyan and turkish president erdogan and the armenian leadership positions this meeting and sort of like some prerequisites for the normalization of relations, and armenia and turkey under the auspices of the west because it was in the fields themselves. this is the european union, to be more precise, i am not even the european union of this european political partnership. yes, and therefore, as a great foreign policy achievement. but from the point of view of turkey in general, erdogan and turkey, she is sincere in her desire to build partnerships with armenia to completely turn over a century and a half of history, how to start peaceful cooperation, because experience turkey's behavior in syria in iraq against the kurdish population is indicative of a beaver. well , let's start with this, a really very important

point. uh, the fact that the leaders of the turkish republic of the republic of armenia met is really a serious event in itself. eh, the first one. turkey had such a doctrine sent. uh-huh yes , which is also known as zero, neighbors zero problems without neighbors. no problem it's already yes , no, so the second important point. now turkey is restarting this strategy e 0:0. yeah, uh and indeed, turkey has with armenia because there is no relationship with armenia, everything is quite logical. uh, now there is a problem of establishing these very relations, and here, uh, there can be a lot of interesting things. from the point of view and benefits of the tour of the russian republic, which receives an exit corresponding to the caspian sea through armenia, the second is interaction with azerbaijan, with which there are one nation, two states. uh, the third is the exit through the caspian sea of ​​​​kazakhstan to turkmenistan, we must understand how this will end. fourth m-m, which is positive for

us it is an opportunity to communicate through the country ias for the time being, at least, uh, through azerbaijan later on to russia, because through georgia it is very difficult and there are a lot of important points here. but uh, we should probably turn that side around. uh, in the direction of our russian interests, from the point of view of the russian federation, the post-soviet space is a priority main direction. we should be primarily interested in what we think we are on this topic, and there is no sharp republic, one of the key problems that was raised, where are they going? with this phrase to end immediately already everything shows us that this is a very counterproductive phrase. uh, georgia actually has no relationship with us today. yes, azerbaijan is strong on its own, because aliyev fundamentally proceeds from the need for his power. and as long as he is, it is clear that this power will be in his hands, and not in turkish hands to strengthen turkey in azerbaijan in

person. yes, of course, just like the strengthening of the west in armenia, and we must understand that all this the game is aimed only at eliminating russian opportunities and russian interests in the post-soviet space, trying to undermine after the soviet space tried in kazakhstan tried in the south caucasus ukraine should everything is on fire around the russian border. this is one of the key civilizations, methods. at the same time, they don't matter at all. uh, turkey can play its game. this is what she does it does very successfully it must be admitted, but uh, in this case the west is looking at it is not something with approval, but, based on the fact that the turkish republic demonstrates to the west, this is how the undermining of russian interests in the post-soviet space. that is, if turkey shows russia that it is becoming more independent?

it's true, it's becoming a more independent, predictable partner with respect to the economy. yes , we have excellent economic relations with turkey, we are establishing relations in the security sphere, but there is a third sphere, and the third sphere is the sphere of the big game of geopolitics. u sphere, uh human capital, if you like the impact very soon we will face the fact. that in the post-soviet space, communicating with our partners, we will communicate not with our brothers, whom we are used to, but with people who have replaced them, that is, roughly speaking, we will communicate. i don’t know, not with the azerbaijanis and the kazakhs, the turks are doing everything to replace the turkic with the turkish uh-huh and with that. we are facing today. so, we will communicate with the turks. so we will communicate with the chinese. we will communicate with the french with the british, with anyone, but armenia because the americans americanize them , but not with our brothers in the post-soviet space in this regard,

it is fundamentally important to radically strengthen them. eh, our work is always when we talk about the problems that exist. yes, there is external influence. yes, there is a lot of it. yes, there are internal problems. there are different opinions, and in the same armenia there are a lot of different opinions regarding the activities of the authorities regarding the activities of the opposition, and so in all countries. soviet space, but another question, this question we need to ask ourselves. and what have we done? here the americans have created 1,000 funds, yes, which operate in georgia and azerbaijan and in armenia, we are a question that we must always start, as we were taught ourselves from childhood. yes, and then, probably, something will change, uh, there is something to work on here, because the turkish republic is acting. extremely active, it creates a single one. uh, the turkic alphabet failed in the 1990s. why didn't it work, because everyone was in

cyrillic. what turkey had to switch to cyrillic? yes, never. and now we see azerbaijan in the latin alphabet to turkmenistan in the latin alphabet kazakhstan is switching to the latin alphabet. yes, uzbekistan has completed the transition and it is symptomatic that the first congress of the e-commission for the creation of a turgocentric new language will be held in kyrgyzstan, where cyrillic a is still needed in the first place. i think it is fundamentally important to pay attention to yourself in the post-soviet space. everything is fine with our economic prospects. mishustin was just in armenia and passed the corresponding discussion of economic projects. well, it does a lot. but, firstly, what we are doing should be more actively covered in the post-soviet space. this is also our task and the second is , uh, the whole world is not built, only around the economy. we talk a lot and often about you on the program about geopolitical issues. here are security issues regarding issues and if it’s a good

day, but value, and what model do we offer today to our partners in the post-soviet space, the turks offer us a model of it may not like it, because it crushes the enormous achievements of the peoples of the former soviet union, but they offer this model, and the americans offer a model; the chinese offer a model question. uh, first of all, it should be put on the fact that we slightly reconsider our approaches. and this is probably the key task. e for the short term, because there are a lot of claims against us on the internal situation, but these claims are built either from ignorance or from an erroneous understanding, or it is maliciously done in order to break our fraternal ties. uh, this cannot be allowed, the post-soviet space must not be allowed to burn and it is very good

that so far all the positive, and that it is important that all the negative revolves around us means, uh, means, uh. russia is one of the most key players in the post-soviet space. we have always been like this and we have been bringing peace and security to the caucasus, and we need to deal with this in the future. i subscribe to every word. here we are now participating in valdai forum with ivan alekseevich. very many representatives from non-western countries say that russia should offer an attractive model of a multipolar world, a multipolar world in itself. and it is not always favorable. yes, you need to make it like this here. uh, russian intellectual political leadership is much more in demand than six degrees, and russia really should offer an attractive model in the post-soviet space. it is vital and interesting, turkey is now pursuing a policy of turkishizing in relation to the turkic peoples of those whom it can turkishize, but in the case of armenia a.

almost won't work. well, of course, therefore, if armenia agrees to the conditions that are now being offered in washington, then i am afraid that we in armenia will not talk with the americans, but in general there will be no one to talk to, because armenia will not be like a country. it is true, such a threat is recognized. there are so many in armenia that there is a threat to the existence of the state. here, and the people will simply dissolve, because it's just the thing when with the moral was the people for thousands of years. so they will disappear like this. you see, being in the union. with russia, armenia exists as a sovereign state, if armenia accepts american conditions, then it will lose the state, armenia will remain, as a set of diasporas in the united states, yes. there, many elites will move. the united states, some will move to france, some will increase in sochi, some will increase in sochi , some in moscow, but precisely.

it will not exist as a sovereign armenian state, i really hope that in armenia, after all, there are political forces that understand dmitry thousands of times. i wrote about it thousands of times. my friends wrote and talked about it, but, apparently, there is a psychological breakdown in a large number of people, and they do not feel it. you know, i want to once again recall vladimir vladimirovich's speech on television after this karabakh war. he remembered a very interesting thing, and he says. it is necessary to make sure that the karabakh people return and live there and continue, he said, you understand, can people return and live there if they don’t have perspectives, if they do not have a status, if they do not have a guarantee for this and remembered, then he was talking about abkhazia and her wife. ossetian. these peoples also

thought that they would disappear, because, well, they got a status. they have received recognition, they have received guarantees for their safety, so they live in their historical territories. well, i actually believe in the wisdom of the armenian people. still. this is one of the most ancient e, continuously existing peoples on earth in 305, 301, 301 even yes, 3025. this is already officially byzantium under constantine converted to christianity. 312 is the adoption of the milanese egypt, but before that, armenia's first state event was the constitution, and since i believe in the wisdom of the armenian people , after all. i hope that on october 31, as part of the trilateral summit in sochi, we will see some positive developments. toward guaranteeing

the security of armenia and the armenian people. we will pause for a few moments and then we will talk about europe ambitious girls challenge the unique alexandra cowardly hot ice grand prix of russia live broadcasts on the weekend on the first i tell you about the card everywhere the income is intelligible, pay everywhere and here everywhere here.