they check on people from the locals who come there, but, as it were, like this, and they say by age, there are still a little more such men at the age than young people. well, i understand that these are volunteers, here the concept of youth is vague. for example, i still consider myself young. yes, and i'm 40 years old there. well, in general, there are people who will say the same. just don't tell anyone. here there is, in short, there are guys, younger. me. that's 30 years there. uh, there is. uh, so i saw one there, he was 62 years old. there's a pretty volunteer alive one and one volunteer, former veteran of the afghan war. and that is, basically, this is the audience, which, let's say, is 30, that's 30 liters or 30-30. plus that is, well, those that i saw, thanks, yes, here i didn’t determine, well, youth, i can say maxim fomin thank you very much, he is vladlen tatarsky from the latest information. well friends, we are

all waiting for the performance. vladimir putin now at the valdai forum people are already gathering topic, discussion discussion forum world after hegemony, justice and security for all and we pass the baton to our colleagues from the program. big game. i hope they will tell and show everything that vladimir vladimirovich has to say. good evening, we are playing a big game live, we are watching what is happening at the meeting of the discussion club. valdai, where president of the russian federation vladimir putin is expected to speak any minute the valdai club is already holding its nineteenth meeting, more than 100 experts from forty-one countries have gathered to discuss the main questions of world politics. and, of course, always. ah,

the final day. the most interesting and most important thing is the speech of the president of the russian federation e. very large problems of world politics are usually discussed. this time. these are the problems of the end of a unipolar transformation into a multipolar one, but this idea itself is taken very seriously. resistance is primarily in the united states of america, and for example, in recent days , anthony blinkin has been speaking very often on this subject, secretary of state of the united states, listen to him yesterday's statement. now is the moment when the post-cold war era has ended and there is competition to separate what comes next. we want to have all the tools to participate in this as much as possible. there is one thing that we know for sure from history, the world order does not organize itself. if the united states of america is not involved in the

great work of organizing peace, then either someone else will do it. this and probably, so this will affect our interests and values, or no one will do anything will do. and then a vacuum is formed, which tends to be filled with bad things rather than good guys. e, it should be noted that 10 days ago exactly the same words. he answered the question of scandal zareis, similar to the seminar. and this already draws on the doctrine, damn it, the doctrine of blinkin that, in the era, uh, when the post-cold war world after the cold war came to an end, a new world begins, which should again become the world of american hegemony, nothing new. doctrine, pancake, still blinken, the doctrine is better, in my opinion, blinkin doctress, blinkin. it's fucking kendactrins. it sounds good, it's good there, in fact, uh, he is cunning, of course, a little bit, because a little bit,

because, of course, the united states, to put it mildly , has always been strongly involved. e in the formation of world processes is another matter. well , at least after the second world war for sure. uh, they just did it and continue to do it, uh, based solely on their own narrowly understood interests, yes, and absolutely spitting on the interests of everyone else, so this is not a question. will they participate in this question, that they do not want others to participate in these processes. namely, russia in the first place and china, that's what they don't want. and the fact that america will participate in them. i think they will figure it out there even without glinkin , so to speak in washington, so dobrinkin participated and will participate after the blinkin question. e in that um. eh, how do they perceive it? it is their participation that other countries perceive as a result of this participation. they have already participated and participated in yugoslavia and participated in

iraq and participated in libya and in syria participated uh. they did something so that, uh, christian shrines, uh, in syria, were not destroyed. but they did nothing. they whined and howled there, so to speak, how much they also discussed it with them there at one time. that's how bad, so to speak, that there are terrorists. and these are some terrorists, who raised them from these terrorists , equipped and equipped them. therefore, how they participate, it's all clear. the results of their participation are also understandable. the question is, by the way, the name of the session of the valdai club, where will our president be now? perform very well too. uh, vyacheslav alekseevich correctly drew attention to the fact that the end is the end. how are the eras? yes, their hegemonism, so to speak, yes, that is, this is absolutely, what will happen after this is absolutely, right because hegemonism is over, and no matter how much you would like it. in washington, there, for blinkin and others , it will definitely not be possible to freeze the situation or somehow preserve and develop it there.

and by the way, i'll say one of the latest examples of this is this. we have always believed that relations between the united states and israel absolutely strategically absolutely trusting absolutely. there are absolutely absolute so to say, yes, here is the president of israel hertz. yes , hertz, gave a powerful slap in the face now ba. yes, very very well done. it's courteous. in the sense that a very civilized culturally sent, so to speak, on all counts, and done. this is in washington , not even in their own country in washington, that is, first they did it with the saudis of saudi arabia with oil. and now i did it, israel with weapons for ukraine refusing to say so, yes, yes, i i agree with some experts that it is generally better that they do not even give this information. there, i don't know what they give, but to do nothing at all. this is right for our

relations with israel. it would only be better and not only for our relationship. but the fact that they refused, now and categorically refused, despite all the pressure that was put on them there and continues, it turns out they refused to supply lethal weapons. uh, the kiev regime, in order to understand the complete hopelessness of this strategic. but no, they perfectly understand when they are afraid that their system will fall. they can get there and so on, but the main thing is not this, the main thing is not this. the main thing is that they don't want to be associated and they keep their hands free absolutely correctly, but this is the most powerful slap in the face of the pax. the americans here are applications for pax, the americans are saving this, that is, they received these rewards from their own, at one time, closest allies or partners. and these are very interesting symptoms. if the buccal his compatriots, too, anyway, that 's the whole concept, uh, which we could christen as blinkin's doctrines. and this

world order based on the rules sent and that's what kind of world order based on the rules is very well past its program. e expressed. e. jimmydore is a well-known radio commentator in the united states of america and he is also popular there, as such a stand-up comedian, but in any case a serious analyst, listen part of the protection of the rules-based world order is not only in the interests of ukraine but also of the whole world. rules based order i paraphrase do as we tell you, because we ourselves do not follow any rules, when we entered afghanistan and occupied it for 20 years, then we did not follow any rules, the same was in iraq where we killed millions of people, when we illegally invaded libya, ruined it and turned it into a bankrupt state. we didn't care about the rule we didn't even care when we dropped 26,000 bombs on syria they call it

a rules based world order but in reality. this means that the us should rule the world. so all these rules are just nonsense right now we have occupied a third of the territory of syria. what exactly is the third where there is oil right now and we are stealing syrian oil. i wonder what rule we follow. so, if you suddenly still do not understand anything, then he says, we want to maintain control over the world and that is why we are now fighting in ukraine here. so you know alekseevich and these rules were assigned, and most importantly, the concept. which stands behind it at the beginning of the 20th century by the mouth of senator bevergy, who said, we are commanded with a great honor to rule over the peoples of evil and savages. here is the relationship from here. this is the concept of exclusivity. also, i think it's one long before senator davidjet. but it was so, well, frankly, that's uh concept of the mayor of the xx century. well, you can still say so,

we manage you because we know better than you that even in your interests. if you do not recognize this, you are an evil to be eradicated. this, in my opinion, is also one american, the smart one said, then it migrated to different ones. this reflects this philosophy very well, therefore, as konstantin konstantinovich rightly said, no one has ever been so naive that without such a power. how to build order, but we are talking about a fair order, we are talking about the rights to protect our interests and negotiate on the basis of reasonable compromises, and not about american hegemony, after all. well, how many times during these months, our military operation has already been heard from the lips of american leaders, russia china is challenging our hegemony, it seems that our only fault is that we defy hegemony, we do not threaten, we are not going to

interfere with the united states in any way. do not trade anything that is not more than some kind of military threat we do not represent for this. we pose a military threat. only from the point of view that e with shai are forced to reckon with our nuclear and other detergents, therefore they would very much like to deprive us of those strategic footholds that, in general, at one time, made our great power this position in the baltic and the black sea . it's quite obvious that's why. uh, ukraine for them whether it is located somewhere in the lena bay. she wouldn't care about anyone. believe me, nazism would never be revived there. here i am, therefore, i think that as you always finish our program, our cause is just and the world will be like this . maybe it is from the hands of sinful people us to be like this. well, i think if ukraine was somewhere in the lena

bay region, they were also very interested in this issue. of course, this is a question in siberia at the expense of which we we will grow this is also an important matter, so water, uh, they are absolutely interested in everything. so globally and the situation in the black sea. e 300 years in general, e, the coast was marched by warriors. well, in any case, ukraine now they again fit into this order, based on the rules, no rules. again, it is not known for something there is actually starting to falter in this. there was a lot of talk about support for ukraine in sensus . uh, this was already talked about by politicians , insiders started talking about this. here is today's article sd new york times. in my opinion, it is very typical , uh, peter baker is one of the most well-known american journalists. he goes to the presidential floor in belodomovsk. he knows there, uh. every corner in the white house is here with a strong irishor. they wrote an article today, listen to the consensus within the us and

among international partners that the biden worked so hard to build as the midterms and cold european winter approached for a few seconds, although 30 progressives retreated in the face of backlash within their for its own party, leftist anxiety serves as a warning sign of fatigue after 8 months of war, financed in large part by us taxpayers, the resulting erosion of support for the current strategy is most noticeable among the political right on the other side of the ocean. european allies faced with the onset of cold weather. with moscow in control of the fuel cock, views on the future course of the conflict with russia differ even among allies who share views are accumulating controversy over energy and defense strategy for biden, who shot a broad coalition in support of his approach, both at home and abroad, the next few weeks could

be decisive. on the one hand, military action in ukraine continues to be favored in the united states; on the other hand, polls show weariness, especially among republicans. it is very important to notice a few things here. well, the first thing is to take a little step back and see what happens when this democratic is extremely. left coalition filed a letter a to biden asking for negotiations and the impossibility for the united states to further participate financially in the conflict in ukraine a. they delivered it right. uh, they probably played it back with an interesting wording. this means that the wording was not such that we are wrong, but the letter we, it turns out, wrote this back in the summer and this letter came out at the wrong time, because it was at that moment that a number of republicans refused to vote on the allocation of financial assistance to ukraine thus. this is an important point, thus

hinting that there will be time, because indeed polls show that american society is very strong. ah, i'm tired and don't understand. why, when there is a crisis in a country, money is sent to another country. this is the first very important point, if there is a coalition today, but there are democratic parties against biden inside, and this can be seen from the way biden is now holding his own, and the pre-election so-called endorsement, that is, support for candidates from democracy in others districts. and if you look, and compared to the same obama, he practically does not. he is sitting at home, they do not want to see him at the election campaigns, his rating is low, so obviously they are throwing this moment away in order to get support for themselves. at least somehow support their midterm elections. well, merge biden. naturally, as an unpopular politician, it must be said that this topic of support for the first thirty liberal democrats or so is called.

progressives of the plan for negotiations on ukraine and then the rejection caused quite seriously. naturally, the public outcry in the media. so i carlson, of course, the most popular tv presenter, devoted his program to this and in this program is very. uh, interesting, on this score expressed cigarettes. uh, the well-known leader of the democratic party is also one of the candidates even for the presidency from the democrats in the last presidential election. let's listen. these so -called progressive liberals did a very simple thing, for which they are now called brave men in washington in this letter from the president, killed, they just told the truth about the consequences of the proxy war against russia for both ukrainians and americans, how it affects fuel prices, how inflation increases because of it, and so on. notice these progressive liberals didn't say stop

sending aid to ukraine all they said was president biden. turn to diplomacy and of course the warmongers who now control the democratic party. we decided to smear them on the wall. and now these democrats congress tremble in a corner with fear and beg for forgiveness for allowing themselves such liberties. how to ask for diplomacy? now they have turned 180° and are supporting the warmongers . they say no, we don't need diplomacy. we don't want this anymore, and tucker is one of the main ones. the reason i left the democratic party. they are completely under the hood of the warmongers, so do not care about the ukrainians. otherwise, they would have initiated negotiations long ago, they don’t care about the americans, who are struggling with all their might just to survive, they are fighting inflation by raising prices for everything that is possible now everything is in the hands of the military and the proof of this is, both the hotheads in the democratic party and the rhetoric of the popular media so wanted to

say nothing personal, this is business, but in relation to the us military-industrial complex and all this adventure connected with ukraine and other things. uh, participation in various military conflicts. where they pulled europe, they were intended only for one completely resubordinate the military-industrial complexes to europe in the military industrial complex the us had partially succeeded in europe had problems with the production of weapons with new projects. even when they started joint projects, for example, joint production. and the tanks of france and germany never came out on the prototype , which was put into production. i'm not talking about others there, but here such a unique chance has turned up, when europe spends all its arsenals, including what they have intended for mobilization and cannot produce something in return. however, i promise yes. we will replace you quickly, but it will be an american weapon, and then we will fix our own there, but then the

economic crisis has struck and will fix something of its own, it becomes impossible and the military industrial companies of the same germany begin to pump aside to the united states of america because they are there create preferential conditions, they are given there, amazing opportunities for the implementation of those ideas that they unsuccessfully struggled with. uh, to knock out this, as they say, money from those ministers of defense who have recently. we observed european women, mostly who they say they didn’t know the tank couldn’t scream there from a machine gun. here, well, the truth is, how to ride on these tanks and what it led to the fact that now the military-industrial complex, which is actually the sacred cow for the united states of america, it also steers america itself, because if america leans on something, and something gets dividends, quickly. this will bring just the military-industrial complex, which has always made money on wars on any on small on medium on large on hybrids it has always found

how to attach your weapon. how to get money for it, even disposal of weapons. she also brought money to the military-industrial complex, because he did not spend a center on this. and now we see that the biden, which was supposed to actually support this military-industrial complex , is starting to slip, because in theory this war, which was started in ukraine, which would still take place regardless of whether we would start a special operation or not start , it does not bring those dividends that all other conflicts, moreover, increased as much as possible. we are talking about tactical nuclear weapons and military circles are starting to discuss the stakes. and that there really will be a third world war, for which the naratu command is very quiet, whispering, from the pentagon command that we are actually not ready and our missile defense will only reflect the maximum of the missiles that will fly from north korea, we must somehow stop, but they are so great rates, especially the profits that the us military-industrial

complex can receive and what are they, as they say, putting pressure on biden, and biden, having a snack on business, rushes forward , believes that the next higher rate will finally bring the very expected dividends, thanks to which america will once again become the great hegemon, which there will be no more competitors. well, it's natural. these are wet dreams that will remain cheats as alternative centers of power have already gained strength in order to thwart american hegemony. uh, dmitry peskov, the presidential press secretary, announcing his speech at the valdai circle, said that his they will be reading and re-reading for a long time, and the viewers of channel one will have the opportunity to see this performance as soon as it starts, even if it happens during the commercial break of the advertisement. i tell you someday that i love

you, not forty half a million soldiers of officers said when they opened the second front, who would have fought, do you know what they called the rescue operation? only bullets whistle me for some reason, to play in england for example, and who is your arrow in the first place, not mine unfortunately. and secondly, i already said, but then why is she sticking her nose in there? where not such a beautiful nose is needed. well, let it vanity. you want me to call the police. now will you tell me who these people are and what they want? 11 silent men premiere november 4 on the first

after all who are you in culture only from november 11 for 9 rubles. smartphone for 6.99 rubles. cream shower gel for 89 rubles. on the site in the application we are adults, but wonder like a child. it's so human in the fix price store for creepy cool fix halloween items. everything is low. price. now many are putting their lives on

pause due to rising prices with a loan from sovcombank make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your plans sovcombank people are more important at work and at home more and more, but less and less strength mildronate activator of my powers of working capacity and mental activity mildronate i am able to do this on monday not a gift about the mood falls already in the morning, so on mondays they receive gifts from the subscriber. tele2 gifts. we have prepared a lot. choose three at once look at your smartphone. everything already. there is a mood inside you. everything will be alright monday and present. we know that monday is tele2 gifts and other rules for a cheerful morning or an excellent dinner. create a cozy atmosphere with smart technology. palace with up to 60% discount. banks with benefits up to 704% banks. brings you ready to everyone and gives

a thousand rubles for fuel in hypermarkets magnet extra is a bakery toys, vegetables and fruits household goods pet supplies cooking and not only a magnet extra all at once. cinema one tv presents, however, the professor has a lot in common between us. i have attended your lectures. this impressive material. palmistry, or maybe the fact is that there was no murder and you deceived me. help

voskresensky this case is a real sensation. someone lets him in, but perhaps, soon she will regret it, no need for a movie one tv presents. blitz, what else needs to happen for you to finally understand? next 1tv movie prison presents, and you didn’t think that there were others next to you. the

hunt continues. we are looking forward to the start of the club meeting on the air of the big game. valdai speech president, which should start any minute and now the president will appreciate listening to the president of the russian federation vladimir vladimirovich hello we look forward to you every year, but this year, probably, patience was even more impatient than usual, there are a lot of topics for discussion myself forum. our forum itself was

mainly devoted to the topic of the world order, how it is changing, and most importantly, who, generally speaking, is now in power in the world. who controls, can it be controlled? basically? well, we're discussing how observers and you're still in power, so share with us, please, your opinion, please. thank you very much, dear participants of the plenary meeting, ladies and gentlemen, friends. i got a little acquainted with the discussions that took place here in the previous days, very interesting and informative. i hope you did not regret that you came to russia and communicate with each other. i am glad to see you all at the valdai club site. we have talked more than once about the shifts, the major shifts that have already taken place and

are taking place in the world, about the risks that are associated degradation of world institutions with the erosion of the principles of collective security with the substitution of international law for the so-called rules. i wanted to say, it’s clear who invented it, but uh, perhaps it’s not exactly clear at all who invented it. uh, on what, uh, what are these rules based on? uh what's inside of these, apparently there is only uh an attempt to approve one rule, so that uh the power that is now, and the authorities said, i'm talking about global power. uh, they had the opportunity to live, without any rules at all, that's all. they were allowed. e would get away with it. whatever they do. here, in fact, these are the very rules that we are constantly told about, as the people talk about it, that is, they constantly talk about it, and the value of the valdai discussions is that a variety of assessments and forecasts are heard here. oh,

how true they were. e, shows the most er, life and the most strict, er, and objective examiner of life. here it shows how correct our preliminary discussions were in previous years already, alas, events continue to develop according to a negative scenario, oh which we spoke more than once or twice walks. uh, previous meetings. moreover, they turned into large-scale events, a systemic crisis, and not only in the military-political, but also in the economic and humanitarian spheres, the so-called west. well , conditionally, of course, there is no unity there. everything is clear that this is a very complex conglomerate, but nevertheless. eh, let's say. so, this one, and the west in recent years, and especially in recent months , has taken a number of steps to aggravate. well

, as a matter of fact, uh, they always play on exacerbation. nothing here. here, too, no. this is inciting war in ukraine. this is a provocation around taiwan, destabilizing the world food and energy market. the last one, of course. it was not done on purpose. it's not here no doubts, and all a series of system errors. here are just those western authorities, about which i have already mentioned, as well. as we see now, uh, plus the destruction of pan-european gas pipelines. these are generally such transcendent things, but nevertheless we are witnessing these sad events. over the world. uh, that's exactly what this so -called west has put at stake in their game, but the game is definitely dangerous, well, bloody, and i would say dirty. it denies the sovereignty of countries and peoples, their originality and uniqueness do not put

in any way that the interests of other states, in any case, if it is not directly said about denial, but in practice this is precisely what is carried out in life. eh, as if no one except those who formulate these very rules, about which i said, have no right to original development. all others must be combed. under these very rules, in this regard, i will remind you of russia’s proposals to western partners to build confidence and build a system of collective security in december last year, they were once again simply thrown aside, but in the modern world it is unlikely that it will be possible to sit out, having sowed the wind, as they say will reap a storm, the crisis has indeed acquired a global character. it affects everyone. uh, there is no need to have any illusions in front of humanity now , in fact, there are two ways or further to accumulate cargo problems that will inevitably crush us all or

still try together. find a solution. though not ideal, but working capable of making our world more stable and safer. you know, i have always believed and believe in this power of common sense, therefore i am convinced, sooner or later, that the west will also become the new center of a multipolar world order. we will have to start an equal conversation about a common future for us and the less, the better of course, in this regard, i will outline some extremely important ones. ah, accents for all of us. today's events overshadowed environmental issues. oddly enough, i would like to start with this issue of climate change has ceased to be, uh, in the first lines of the agenda, but these fundamental challenges. they haven't disappeared anywhere. don't share anywhere. they are only growing. one of the most dangerous consequences of the violation of the

ecological balance is the reduction of biodiversity in nature. and now i turn to the main topic, for which we have all gathered, but is it less important to have another cultural , social, political, civilizational diversity together. with at the same time, simplification, the erasure of all and any differences , have become almost the essence of the modern west. what is behind such simplification? first of all, this is the disappearance of the creative potential of the west itself and the desire to restrain and block the free development of other civilizations. there is also a direct mercantile, of course. interest, imposing their values, consumer stereotypes unification and e unification hmm our opponents. so neatly i will name them and hmm and they are trying to expand markets for their products. everything is very on in the end on this

the track is primitive, not by chance the west claims what exactly? oh, culture and worldview should be universal, but if it is not directly said, although it is also said directly to clean. eh, often, i mean, i don't directly say that's how they behave and behave. eh, and hmm insist that, in fact , by the fact of life, their policy insists that it is these values ​​that are unconditionally accepted by all other participants in international communication will quote from the famous harvard speech of alexander savich solzhenitsyn back in 1978 he noted that for the west is characterized by a continuing quotation of dazzling superiority. this is what is happening so far, which further quotation supports the idea that all vast areas on our planet should develop and develop to the

current western systems. seventy-eighth year yes, nothing has changed. over the past almost half a century , this blindness, about which solzhenitsyn spoke frankly russian and not near-genial in nature, has already acquired simply ugly forms, especially after it arose called e on the polar world, that i want to say on this e on this confidence in my infallibility. this is a very dangerous condition. it is one step from it to the desire of the infallibles themselves to simply destroy those they do not like. how do they say cancel? let's think about it, at least in the meaning of this word, even at the height of the cold war at the peak of the confrontation between the systems of ideology and military rivalry, it never even occurred to anyone to deny the very existence of the culture of the art of science of other peoples of their opponents. nobody even had to. yes

, certain restrictions were introduced on educational, scientific, cultural and, unfortunately, on sports relations, but nevertheless, both the soviet and american leaders of that time had enough understanding that the humanitarian sphere must be treated delicately, studying and respecting the opponent, sometimes something and borrowing e with him, in order to preserve, at least for the future, the basis for healthy , fruitful relationships. and now what is happening? the nazis reached the burning of books in their time, and now the prohibitions of dostoevsky and tchaikovsky rolled down western parents, liberalism and progress the so-called abolition culture, but in fact we have already talked about this many times, the real abolition of culture. uh, it mows down all living creative things and does not allow free thoughts to develop in any of the areas, either in the economy, or in politics , or in culture. the very liberal ideology. today has changed unrecognizable if originally

classical liberalism. i understood the freedom of every person. how is the freedom to speak? what you want to do, whatever you want, is already in the 20th century, and the liberals have become declare that the so-called open society. there are enemies, it turns out, of an open society, there are enemies, and the freedom of such enemies can and should be limited, or even cancelled. now they have reached the point of absurdity, when any alternative point of view is declared subversive propaganda and a threat to democracy. that's what does not come from russia. this is all the machinations of the kremlin , see. really, we are so almighty that any criticism addressed to our opponents is perceived as the hand of the kremlin intrigues of the kremlin. well, this is some kind of nonsense. yes, what did they roll down? well

at least move your brains somehow more interestingly something to state your point of view to state somehow, conceptually, you can’t blame everything on e, all this was prophetically predicted by fyodor mikhailovich dastoevsky back in the 19th century, one of the characters in his novel demons nihilist shegalev, and this is how he described the bright future he invented. quote coming out of boundless freedom, i conclude with boundless despotism. by the way, this is what our western opponents came to in his toilet, another other protagonist of the novel, pyotr verkhovensky, arguing that a widespread betrayal of the denunciation of espionage is necessary, that society does not need talents and higher abilities, and then the tongue of cicero is cut off, the

eyes of copernicus are vocalized shakespeare is beaten with camii. well , this is where ours come in. western opponent that this is not modern western culture. cancel. there were great thinkers, and i am grateful , to be honest, to my assistants who found these quotes, that you can, what can you say, history will melt, unconditionally put everything in its place and cancel, not the greatest, generally recognized e works of universally recognized genius in world culture. and those who today for some reason decided that it is in the right of this world culture to dispose of it at its own discretion. the self-conceit of such figures, what is called off scale? that's just their names in a few years, no one even remembers. and dostoevsky will live and tchaikovsky and pushkin no matter how anyone would like it, it was on unification on

financial and technological monopolism that the effacement of all and all kinds of differences was built and the western model of globalization is not about colonial its essence. the task was understandable to strengthen the unconditional dominance of the west in the world economy and politics. and for this, to put at the service of natural and financial resources , intellectual personnel and economic opportunities of the entire planet to do this under the sauce of the so-called new global interdependence. here i would like to recall another russian philosopher alexander aleksandrovich zinoviev, whose centenary is on hmm centenary from the date of his birth, whom we will celebrate just the other day on october 29, even more than 20 years ago. he said that necessary for the survival of western civilization at the level reached by it. there is also a quote, the whole planet is necessary, as an environment, existence,

all the resources of mankind are necessary, and they do not claim this, it is. everything is just like that. and in this system. the west initially laid itself a huge head start, as he himself developed its principles and mechanisms. how are these very principles now, which are constantly repeated and hmm, which are an incomprehensible black hole, what is it? no one knows, but once the benefits of globalization have become to extract, not western countries, but other states, and above all, we are talking, of course, about the large states of asia, the west immediately changed or completely canceled many rules and illuminated so -called sacred principles. freedom of trade economic openness equal competition, even the right of ownership. all of a sudden, they completely forgot about it. how did something become profitable for themselves so

immediately on the go, in the course of the game they change the rules or another example of the substitution of concepts and meanings western ideologists and politicians have been saying and repeating for many years the whole world of democracy, there is no alternative. true speech. they were talking about the western liberal so -called model of democracy. everything else is all other options and forms of democracy. they scornfully and i want to emphasize this through the lip, arrogantly rejected. this manner has been established for a long time since colonial times, everyone is considered second-class people, and they continue to be exceptional for centuries to this day. but today, the absolute majority of the world community is precisely what demands democracy in international affairs. accepts any form of authoritarian dictate of individual countries or groups of states, which is not a direct application of the principles of democracy at the level of international relations, and what is the position

of the civilized west in quotation marks ? , the west calls it undermining the liberal order based on the rules starts economic trade wars sanctions boycotts, color revolutions are preparing and carrying out various kinds of revolutions. here is one of them led to tragic consequences in ukraine in 2014. they even supported they said how much money the electoral coup was generally dumbfounded. just do not hesitate to take anything. here suleiman killed uh iranian. uh, the general can be treated as you like, what were they? well, whatever you like, but this official of another state was killed on the territory of a third country and say. yes, we killed what it is in general we where we live. and washington, out of

habit, continues to call the current measures order american-style liberal, but in fact, every day this notorious order multiplies the chaos and i will add . everything is suppressed in the bud directly and impose more sanctions against their own allies, without any hesitation, and those? we completely agree to lower our heads. well , for example, the july proposals of the hungarian parliamentarians to fix the commitment to european christian values ​​in the eu treaty and culture were perceived not even as a front. but as a direct hostile sabotage. what is this? well , how to understand it? well, some people might like it, some might not. in russia, for a thousand years, a unique culture of interaction between all world religions has developed. there is no

need to cancel anything, not christian values, nor islamic non-jewish values, other world religions. at us are present it is necessary simply with respect to treat each other. we have in a number of regions of the country. i just know it's not hearsay. people go together and celebrate christian holidays, islamic and buddhist. jewish and do it with pleasure. i congratulate each other and rejoice in each other. but not here. why not? well, at least we discussed it. yes , all this is no exaggeration. not even a systemic doctrinal crisis of the neoliberal american model of the world order, they have no ideas of creating positive development. they simply have nothing to offer the world, except to maintain their dominance, real democracy is convinced in multipolar world. first of all, it implies

the possibility of any people. i want to emphasize this for any society of any civilization to choose its own path, its own social political system, if there is such a right, well , the united states of the european union countries certainly have the countries of asia, the islamic states of the monarchy of the persian gulf, the states of other continents, if, of course, it is in our country in russia and no one will ever be able to dictate to our people. what kind of society and on what principles should we build a direct the threat to the political economic ideological monopoly, the west is that the world may emerge. active public models are more effective, i would like to emphasize that more effective in today's day brighter more attractive than something that exists, but such models will definitely develop. it is inevitable that everyone should, by the way, american political scientists

specialists. they write about it directly, although their authorities, those in power, do not really listen. although they cannot fail to see these ideas that are expressed on the pages of, uh, political science magazines and discussions. it is necessary to develop the development should take place precisely in the dialogue of civilization based on spiritual and moral values, and different civilizations have a different understanding of man of his nature. it is only honest on the surface, only different, but everyone recognizes the highest dignity and spiritual essence of a person. and this is extremely important. hmm, the common common foundation on which we can certainly build and must build our future is extremely important, that here i want

to emphasize traditional values ​​- this is not some kind of fixed set of postulates that everyone must adhere to. of course not, their difference from the so-called neoliberal values ​​is that in each case they are not repeatable, because they follow from the tradition of a particular society, its culture and historical experience. therefore, traditional values ​​cannot be imposed on anyone; they must simply be respected with care for what each nation has chosen, uh, for centuries. chosen for centuries. every nation. this is our understanding of traditional values, and this approach shared and accepted by the majority of mankind. this is natural, because it is the traditional societies of the east of latin america, africa, eurasia that form the basis of world civilization, respect for the peculiarities of peoples and civilization in the interests of

everyone, in fact, this interests and the so -called west, losing superiority. he is quickly becoming a minority on world time. and, of course, the right of this western minority to its own cultural identity, i certainly want to emphasize this, it must be ensured absolutely necessary for this. with respect, but i emphasize on an equal footing with the rights of everyone else, if the western elites believe that they can instill strange things into the minds of their people of their societies. in my opinion, newfangled trends, like dozens of genders and gay parades. so be it, assuming what they want, but uh, what they definitely have no right to. so it is to require others to follow in the same direction. we see that complex demographic political

social processes are unquestionably going on in western countries. this is their inner a business. russia does not interfere in these issues and is not going to do so, unlike the west. we do not interfere in someone else's yard, but we hope that pragmatism will triumph and russia's dialogue with the genuine traditional west, as well as with other equal centers of development, will become an important contribution to the construction multipolar world order. i will add that multipolarity is a real, and in fact the only chance for the same europe to restore its political and economic subjectivity. well, what's wrong with hiding? we understand everything and also tell europe about it straight. today, this is the legal personality of europe, to put it mildly, in order not to offend anyone, there is no, by nature, diversity, no attempts. the west to drive everyone under one template

objectively, and the reasons nothing will come of it. an arrogant desire for world leadership, and, in fact, to dictate or maintain leadership through dictates. in fact, it turns into a decrease in international authority and the leader of the western world, including the united states, and an increase in distrust of such treaties in the ability to in general, today they say one thing, tomorrow they sign another document, tomorrow you refuse them. well, they do what they want, well, some kind of stability there is nothing at all, how do documents sign what to talk about? what can you wear completely incomprehensible? if earlier only a few countries allowed themselves to argue with the same america. it looked almost like a sensation, but now it is already commonplace when various states

refuse washington its unfounded demands, despite the fact that he is still trying to put pressure on everyone. an erroneous policy is absolutely nowhere, just well, even if this is also their choice, the people and the world are convinced that they will not turn a blind eye to the policy of coercion, which has discredited itself and every time i forget for trying to maintain my hegemony, i will have to pay and pay more and more prices in the place of these persons . the west would seriously think about such a prospect just as they think about it, as i have already said, some political scientists, and politicians in the united states itself and in the current conditions tough conflict, i will say some things directly. russia being an independent original civilization. i have never considered and do not consider myself an enemy of the west. americano phobia anglophobia

francophobia germanophobia are the same forms of racism as russophobia and anti-semitism, however, like any manifestations of xenophobia. you just need to clearly understand that there are, as i said before, two west at least two, and maybe more, but at least two west of traditional, primarily christian values ​​freedom of patriotism is the richest culture, but now islamic values, too, a significant part of the population of many western countries profess islam, but this west is somewhat close to us, we have in many respects common roots even more ancient, but if the other west is aggressive, cosmopolitan, not near-anial, acting, as an instrument of liberal lines, it is with children of this western russia, of course. never reconcile. here in 2000. after being elected president

, i always faced something. and i will always remember this. remember the price we paid to destroy the terrorist nest on the north the caucasus, which the west then practically openly supported here, all adults, most of you present. in this hall, they understand what i am talking about. we know that this is exactly what happened in practice. financial political information support, well, we all survived it, moreover, not only actively supported the terrorists on the territory of russia, but also in many ways nurtured this threat. we know this. nevertheless, after the stabilization of the situation, when the main terrorist gangs were defeated, including thanks to the courage of the chechen people, we made a decision not to look back at us do not build yourself offended go forward build relationships even with those who actually worked

against us to establish and develop relations with everyone who wants it on the basis of mutual benefit and respect for each other thought , these are common interests. russia, thank god, survived all the difficulties of that time, withstood, strengthened itself with internal terrorism, coped with the economy , preserved, began to develop defense capability. started to rise. we tried to build a relationship and with the leading parties of the west and with nato the message is the same. let's stop being enemies. let's live together. let's have a dialogue to build trust, and hence the world. we were absolutely sincere. i want to emphasize this. they clearly understood the complexity of such a rapprochement, but went for it. and what did we

get? did you get a short answer? there is no possible cooperation in almost all main areas. we got a constant growing pressure on us and the creation of hotbeds of tension at our borders and the purpose of allowing to ask this what kind of pressure is this? well, what kind of training is so easy or what? well, of course not. the goal is to make russia more vulnerable, the goal is to turn russia into a tool to achieve their own geopolitical goals. well, as a matter of fact, everyone is trying to turn this universal rule into a tool in order to use these tools for their own purposes. and those who do not submit to this pressure do not want to be such a tool against them sanctions are imposed against them or all kinds of relationships are carried out, uh

economic restrictions. uh, it means that a coup is being prepared or carried out where it is possible to carry out and so on and so on. we'll end up, if at all unable to do anything, absolutely annihilate. brush off the political map, well, it didn’t work out and will never be able to deploy and implement such a scenario in relation to russia. what else i would like to add russia is not challenging or is there the west russia is simply defending its right to exist, free development, while we ourselves are not going to stop with some new hegemon. russia is not proposing to replace unipolarity with bipolarity of three, polarity and so on dominance. west dominance east north or south. this is inevitable, would lead

to a new impasse. i want to quote here the words of the great russian philosopher nikolai yakovlevich danilevsky, who believed that progress does not consist in going in the same direction for everyone, as our opponent pushes us a little. in this case, progress will soon stop, he says, yes, not abruptly, but in the fact that the whole field proceeds, constituting the arena of the historical activity of mankind in all directions, and he adds that not a single civilization. it cannot be proud that it represents the highest point of development. i am convinced that dictatorship can be countered only by the freedom of development of the country of peoples. degradation of the personality love for a person as a creator primitive forgiveness by prohibition of the flourishing complexity of

cultures and traditions opportunities are opening up for its original democratic path of development, and above all, we believe that the new world order should be based on law and the right to be free, original and fair, so the world economy and trade should become more fair and open russia considers inevitable the process of formation of new international financial platforms, in including for the purposes of international settlements, such platforms must be located outside national jurisdictions. be safe depoliticized automated and does not depend on any single control center. is it possible to do this or not? of course yes. it will take a lot of effort to combine the efforts of many countries, but to do this , the possibility of abuse can be excluded. in

the area of ​​the new global financial infrastructure. it will make it possible to efficiently and safely manage international transactions without the dollar and other so -called reserve currencies. moreover, using the dollar as a weapon. uh, the united states yes, and the west as a whole has discredited the institute international financial reserves. first, they were devalued due to inflation in the dollar and euro zones, and then tsap-tsarap pocketed all of our gold and foreign exchange reserves. the transition to settlements in national currencies will inevitably gain momentum. this, of course, depends on the level of wealth of the issuers of these currencies. the state of their economies. well, they will become stronger, and such calculations will certainly be, uh, they will gradually begin to dominate. this is the logic of the timely sovereign economic financial policy of the multipolar world. today new centers

world development already possess unique technologies and scientific developments in various fields. and in many areas they can successfully compete with western multinational companies, it is obvious that we , uh, have a common, quite pragmatic interest in an honest and open scientific and technological fire; together, everyone will benefit more than they should benefit individually. not individual super-rich corporations. and what is the situation today if the west sells medicines to other countries or, uh, uh, seeds food crops, they are ordered to kill the national pharmaceutics of basilica. well, in fact, because in practice it all boils down to this supplying the machine tool with equipment ruining local mechanical engineering. you know, it’s worth it, but i’m still, uh, being the chairman

of the government. i realized this is only hmm open the market. for a specific for a specific product group, all local producers lay down and it is almost impossible to raise their heads to build a relationship in this way, markets are captured and the country's resources are deprived of their technological scientific potential. this is not progress, but enslavement reducing economies to a primitive level, technological development should not increase world inequality, but reduce it, this is how russia traditionally implements its foreign and technological policy well , for example, uh, by building nuclear power plants in other states. we create at the same time. there centers of competence train national personnel. we are creating industries, we are not just building an enterprise, but we are creating an entire industry. in fact, we give other countries

the opportunity to make a real breakthrough in their scientific technological development to reduce inequality and bring their energy industry to a new level of efficiency and environmental friendliness. once again i emphasize sovereignty, original development in no way means isolation, eh, authors, but on the contrary, it implies active interaction and mutually beneficial cooperation between us of fair and equal principles, if liberal globalization, if liberal globalization is the depersonalization of the imposition of the western model on the whole world, then integration, on the contrary disclosure the potential of each civilization in the interests of the whole for the common benefit. if globalism is a dictate and this is what it all comes down to in the end, then integration is the joint development of common strategies that are beneficial to everyone in this section. russia

considers it important to more actively launch the mechanisms for creating large spaces built on the interaction of neighboring countries. whose economy social system resource base infrastructure complement each other. such large spaces, in fact, are the basis of a multipolar world order. economic basis from their dialogue and a true unity of humanity is born, much more complex, original and multidimensional than in the simplified ideas of western idiologists, well, in some western regions, the only humanity is not built on command , does as i, be as i am, it is formed taking into account and based on the opinions of all with respect for identity of each society and people, it is on this principle that long-term interaction in a multipolar world can develop. in this regard. it may be worth considering that the structure

the united nations, including its security councils, to a greater extent reflected precisely the diversity of world regions, because from asia to africa to latin america in the world of tomorrow. much more will depend on it than is commonly believed today, and such an increase in their influence is certainly a positive reminder that western civilization is not the only one, even in our common eurasian space; moreover, the majority of the population is concentrated precisely in the east of eurasia , where the centers of ancient civilizations arose for humanity, the value and significance of eurasia lies in the fact that this continent is a self-sufficient complex with gigantic resources of any kind and huge opportunities, and the harder we work to increase the connectivity of eurasia by creating new ways of forms of cooperation, the more impressive success.

we will strive. successful activities of the eurasian economic union rapid growth of the authority and influence of the shanghai cooperation organization large-scale initiatives within the framework of the one belt one road multilateral plans cooperation on the implementation of transport corridors north, south, and many other projects in this part of the world. sure. this is the beginning of a new era of a new stage in the development of eurasia integration projects. here they do not contradict, but mutually complement each other. of course, if they are carried out by strange neighbors in their own interests, and are not introduced by external forces in order to split it into the russian space, turn it into a zone of bloc confrontation , its western parts could be a natural part of greater eurasia, and the extremity of europe but many of its leaders the conviction that europeans are better than others interferes.

that it is not appropriate for them to participate in some undertakings on an equal footing with the rest behind such arrogance, they somehow do not notice that they themselves have already become, in a foreign periphery, turned, in fact , into vassals. often and without the right to vote dear colleagues the collapse of the soviet union also destroyed the balance of geopolitical forces. the west felt like a winner and proclaimed a unipolar device, in which only its will, its culture, its interests had the right to exist. now this historical period undivided dominance. western world affairs culminates in a thing of the past at polar world. we are at a historical frontier. ahead is probably the most dangerous unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the times. e the end of world

war ii. the west is not able to single-handedly manage humanity, but it is desperately trying to do it, and most of the peoples of the world no longer want to measure it. this is the main contradiction of the new era, in the words of a classic , the situation is to a certain extent the revolutionary leadership they cannot, and not for they do not want to live like this, to use the words of a classic. this state of affairs is fraught with global conflicts or a whole chain of conflicts. e, what is a threat to humanity, including the west itself, to constructively and creatively resolve such a contradiction? here is today's main historical task - the change of age is a painful, but natural and inevitable future world order is being formed before our eyes. and in this world order. we must listen to everyone and take into account every point of view. each

people society culture each system of worldviews and gaia and religious ideas, without imposing a single truth on anyone, and only on this basis, understanding their responsibility for the fate of the fate of the peoples of the planet, build a symphony of human civilization. this is where i would like to end with words of gratitude for the patience that you showed while listening to my message. thank you so much. thank you very much, vladimir vladimirovich i can't speak for such a comprehensive text. here spontaneously do not cling to your ending. once you already remembered the revolutionary situation, tops and bottoms. but those who are a little older taught all this at school. naturally, and who do you associate yourself with most?