of the west, of course, uh in part of this population hmm means, mmm. it was cultivated by someone who began to like it, and in its particularity there are historical languages, of course, they began to use it exactly for this purpose. share power. nothing here. it's not that unusual. enu achieved certain, uh, goals, of course, and then it degenerated in general, uh, in cooperation with hitler during the second world war, when uh, when ukrainian collaborators were used to uh carry out actions to destroy russians and e, the same poles and jews of belarus, so it is well known. this is a historical fact. uh, so, uh, the punishers entrusted the dirtiest bloody deeds, primarily to bandera. well, uh, that's all, this is part of our history, but the fact that u is based on u, russian ukrainians, is, in fact, one

people is u, this is a historical fact. it is then a civil war, it turns out to be part of its own people. we ended up in different states. unfortunately, due to the body of a number of reasons, and above all, because while creating the soviet union after the collapse of the empire, as i have already written in my articles and said repeatedly. uh, the bolshevik leadership of that time made a decision to appease uh, the so nationalist part, and the bolsheviks uh, who were originally from ukraine uh. it means to endow them with primordially russian historical territories, territories, without asking the population who lived in these territories, they transferred all little russia there, and everything, e black sea. uh, here is the donbass, and at first they decided to give the donbass to russia, then i arrived delegation with ukraine came to war. lenin and he

called the representatives of the donbass and said, we must go back to ukraine, but uh, well, in this sense in this sense, ukraine of course. hmm took shape like artificial states. especially after the second world war. this is what a historical fact stalin took and transferred to ukraine a number of polish territories, a number of hungarian e, a number of romanian. uh, so, uh, having taken away from these countries, yes, these countries and their territories, he is a pole, yes, who did not participate in the nazi coalition part of the german lands of the eastern german states is well known. everything. these are the historical facts that have developed in such a way. here's today's ukraine hmm but, to be honest, now i just thought about something, and frankly speaking, the only real one. such a serious guarantor of ukrainian state sovereignty and territorial

integrity could only be russia, which created today's ukraine. guarantor well , they talked about guarantors, uh, i remember in the spring then all this went somewhere. still, the question is probably, uh, rhetorical given that there is also fighting here . there's a lot going on there, but uh, both you and russian officials have repeatedly said that the special operation is going according to plan. that's all the same, what kind of plan, to be honest, the society does not really understand what plan e you understand. e, so we are originally, because i am originally. i said right on the day the operation began. uh, the most important thing we have is this help from the donbass well, look, then i already mentioned this. uh, and if we acted, otherwise we wouldn't be able to get there on both sides. uh, on which donbass to place our armed forces? this is the first second uh, the second hmm

uh, is the lugansk people's republic followed in full? there are military events related to the donetsk republic itself. and, of course, when our troops approached from the south and the north and it became obvious that, uh, that the people living in these historical novorossiysk territories do not see their future together with russia, how could we not respond to this. therefore, those events took place as witnesses, which we all e are. hmm, they arose in the course, like as a logical e, continuation e situation that has developed at this point in time, but the plan was and the only goal was to help people who live yes, donbass yes, this is what it comes from. what exactly is there? uh, what the general staff is planning, but it's necessary. uh, i know, of course, that, well, it seems to me that this is not the

time to go into details about this. hmm. thank you dear friends. well, i satisfied my primary curiosity by monopolizing. all now, please, those who wish can ask a question. son so let's start ivan with french. you said that we a very important decade is ahead in the development of the world and our country, but it seems that there is some door to this decade. and so he me just a question about this door. lately , a lot closer closer. yes, it has grown exponentially in recent years. the intensity of nuclear rhetoric. ukraine has moved from simply irresponsible statements to the practical preparation of a nuclear provocation, and representatives of the united states

and, uh, britain, uh, make statements, uh, in which such notes sound, and the admissibility of nuclear use of nuclear weapons. biden. let's say he talks about nuclear armageddon. and right there in america there are comments in the spirit that they say it’s not scary and at the same time uh, the united states is rapidly deploying modernized tactical uh, tactical nuclear bombs in europe. uh, it turns out something like the fact that they are rattling nuclear weapons, and they refuse to recognize the lessons of the caribbean crisis. here. please explain, vladimir vladimirovich, the world is indeed on the threshold of the possibility of using nuclear weapons. and how in these conditions russia will behave like a responsible world nuclear power. thanks e. watch as long as nuclear

weapons exist there are always dangers of using them. the first second goal of today's fuss around nuclear threats and the possible use of nuclear weapons, it is very primitive. and i'm hardly mistaken if i say, what is it? well , i have already said that this is the dictate of the western countries. their attempt to put pressure on all participants in international communication, including neutral or friendly countries ends in nothing and they are looking for additional arguments in order to convince our friends or neutral states that we all need to stand together against russia and provocations with uh

nuclear weapons, forcing the possibility of the thesis itself is possible, the use of nuclear weapons by russia. uh, left precisely used precisely to achieve these goals, influence our friends, our allies, influence neutral states to tell him, look who you support there, what, uh, russia is a terrible country. you don't need to support it anymore. you don't have to cooperate with her. you don't have to sell them anything. in fact, this is a primitive primitive goal, what is really happening with us we, after all, uh, hmm proactive never said anything about the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia, but only hinted at the statements made by the leaders of western countries. well,

mrs. alistras recently told me, uh, the recent prime minister of great britain. she said directly, uh, in a conversation with representatives of the press. yes the uk is nuclear power duties of the minister's example include possible application and will do so. well, it's not verbatim. yes, close to the text. i'm ready for it. well, as you know, no one reacted in any way. well, let's say she blurted out. here is a girl who is a little out of her mind. well, well, how can you say such things in public, but if you corrected her, then in washington they publicly said, we have nothing to do with this. we don't know and it wasn't necessary to offend, well, it's just that everyone is silent from the boundary , and what should we think? we think it's agreed position. why are they

blackmailing us? and why should we be completely silent to pretend that we did not hear anything, or what? with a series of other statements comes guidance on this matter. uh, so, the kiev regime constantly talks about its desire, uh, to possess nuclear weapons. this is the first part of the moralized ballet, and then there is constant talk about what we are doing at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant. what are we doing there? sometimes they say so directly, but they constantly hint that we are shelling zaporizhia nuclear power plant, but they didn’t brand it at all. we control, these are the atoms. so i talked, well, a couple of months have already passed, probably with one of the western leaders. he says, take me away. what do you need to do? remove

heavy weapons reserves zaporozhye station, i say, i agree. we have already done. there are no heavy weapons there, yes, remove them for something else. well , some kind of nonsense. you see, here you are laughing at the real thing. that's funny, but it's actually almost verbatim. i listen to him, but there, uh, you they asked that our e be located at the station. uh, representatives are rich. we agreed they were there. they even refused to live in a hotel. they live right on the territory of the nuclear power plant right on the territory, they see with their own eyes what is happening, who is shooting where the shells are flying from? after all, no one is talking about the fact that ukrainian troops are shelling the nuclear power plant . the excitement, blaming russia for this, well, this is

nonsense, but it would seem nonsense, but this is actually happening. so i have also spoken publicly about that three or four high-voltage power lines brought down sabotage groups on the kiev regime, u around the kursk nuclear power plant, but, unfortunately, the fsb could not catch them, well, they will, i hope someday. gone, but they did it . we have informed all western partners of silence, as if nothing is happening to some kind of nuclear incident, in order to lay responsibility on russia and inflate some new round of anti-russian sanctions against russia and so on, then of a different meaning. i just don't see. but same happens and here is now a new one. so

an idea. we didn't publish it by accident. uh, data from the special services about the fact that they are preparing some kind of incident, the so-called dirty bomb, i decided to just do it. we even know where to do it. it’s the remnants, there the nuclear fuel was slightly transformed by the technologies available in ukraine allow it to be done, loaded there at the point y or somewhere else, this nuclear device was blown up somewhere. they said that it was russia that launched the nuclear strike. we don't need him to do this. we have no meaning. not political, not military. so no, they do it for you. and it was i who instructed shoigu to call all his colleagues and inform him about it. but we cannot ignore such things. they are now saying that the iaea wants to come and check nuclear facilities. we are for ukraine and

we need to do this as soon as possible and as widely as possible, because we know that now the kiev authorities are doing everything to cover up the traces of this preparation, they are working. well, and finally about application of non-application. uh, the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state is the united states of america they will do it twice against japan for what purpose? in military military expediency there was no zero at all. well , what was the expediency of using nuclear weapons against hiroshima and nagasaki, and practically against civilians? that there was some kind of threat to the territorial integrity of the united states to sovereignty? no, of course not.

and there was no longer any military expediency. on japan's war machine was broken, the possibilities for resistance were reduced to almost zero. why was it necessary to finish off japan with nuclear weapons, by the way, and japanese textbooks. e, as a rule, they write that it was the allies who launched a nuclear strike on japan, so they can’t write this japan in school textbooks, really. although like every year remember this tragedy. well done americans. you just need to take an example, probably, in some ways they are just handsome, but it happens it is life. well, the united states is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons. and i did it because i thought that you were their interests. as for russia, we have military doctrine. let it be read in the relevant

articles of this war of the doctrine written as in what cases, on what occasion, in connection with what and in what way russia considers it possible to use weapons of mass destruction in the form of nuclear weapons to protect its sovereignty , territorial integrity to ensure the security of the russian people. here we have literally tomorrow is 60 years of the main day of the caribbean crisis. here is the climax, when they actually decided to retreat. you can imagine yourself as one, or rather. khrushchev, it turns out we can’t reach this, in no case will it reach. no, i ca n’t imagine in the role of khrushchev in any way well, but in the role of a leader who will have to resolve this issue, we are ready to resolve any issues, we are no longer refusing. we made a proposal to the united states last december.

continue dialogue on strategic stability in december last year. silence, if they want, we are ready, please, and if they don’t want, don’t, we are developing our modern delivery vehicle technologies, including, uh, hypersonic weapons, we basically don’t need anything. you and i feel enough. yes, it is clear that someday they will catch up with us in terms of hypersonic weapons. this is obviously a high-tech country. it's here it's only a matter of time, but haven't caught up yet. we still have and we are developing these technologies, if hmm someone wants to lead with us dialogue on this subject, we are ready. so leverage maharad, please give me a chest, pulled. rating

africa sunshine sphere production

is one of the key issues one of the key issues for today's development and the future of not only the financial system, but also the world order. you hit right in the top ten, huh? after the second world war, the united states created a brother on a narrow system, strengthened it many times in a variety of vectors. uh, created international institutions that are under their control, uh, and in finance in international trade. they falter obviously. so, a huge mistake on the part of the states, i already talked about using e for the dollar. as a weapon in the struggle for their political interests, they undermine confidence in the dollar.

well, to others. uh, reserve currencies are fundamentally undermining. believe me. i know what i'm saying because everyone's up to it. is it worth it to keep e, means of gold foreign exchange reserves in dollars. it's not so easy to get out of dollars, because the americans have created a very powerful system, which holds uh, these reserves do not release them, in fact it is very difficult to get out, but uh, blow everything out for the future. so, i already said, i can only repeat. what do we see, uh, the future of the financial international financial system, well, first of all, uh, this is such a common general message, nevertheless, it should be for all countries. uh, sovereign development is secured. need to be treated. with respect to the choice of any country. this is also important even when applied to the financial system. she must be independent depoliticized and of course she must be

based on financial systems. leading countries of the world and now, if this is created, and this is not a simple process, it is very difficult. but it is possible that then international institutions will work more effectively. they need either to be reformed or to create anew international institutions of assistance to those countries that need this support above all else. uh, it will be necessary to provide on the basis of this new financial system . uh, transfer formation and technology transfer. now, if everything together is summarized to assemble, as a palette of necessary perhaps to the realization of opportunities, then the economic model and the financial system itself. uh, she, uh, will meet the interest of the majority, and not

just the interest of this golden golden billion that we talked about, uh. and how are the forerunners? here is the creation of such a system. it is, of course, uh, the need to expand upon expansion , mmm. ah, calculations of national currencies. and taking into account the fact that the us financial authorities use the dollar, as a weapon and create problems for calculations. uh, not only to us, but also to our partners and others countries. e, of course, here is the desire for independence , it will be inevitable, e, develop the calculation of its national currencies. for example, with india, we have , in my opinion, already 53% in exports, we use the national currency in calculations, i don’t know about 27 percent for imports, and with other

countries the comb is developing very actively. hmm is developing very actively with china, and settlements in yuan and rubles and with other countries will not list everyone. eh, so here it is. uh, as for your own financial system, then on my sight. eh, the general path of development is creation. depoliticized based on national e -monetary systems, e, well, such a supranational, e, world monetary system. eh, which would uh certainly provide the calculation of this, perhaps in the end one way or another and proceeding. here , take the first steps in the calculation of national flights, then at the regional level. well, i think this process will develop. uh, colleagues, please, when you ask a question, introduce yourself? here is the rasseghan maharaj, we have a guar, to make it clear it was, but alika was a scandinavian. vladislav arrived and

my question a concerns, and my country, my region , discourses have recently intensified, and the preparation of an agreement e between the orbit of azerbaijan and , uh, these discus, mainly that there are two, uh, competing projects. oh well, so to speak, the russian proposed by the russian intermediary and uh, the western situation is quite a risky situation. and hmm, in general, there are risks in the region. she is not very calm. and what is russia in this sense, uh, thinks, how is russia going to to react to this situation, and how does russia plan to act further in this

context? thank you, you know. i maybe, i don't know, even talked about it before or not, in public. maybe agreed. or maybe not, but i will say i don’t see here, even if they didn’t say, there are no secrets, i don’t see any, we have been leading for many years. uh, dialogue with uh the armenian side and uh, they proposed to resolve the issue related to karabakh in the following way. after all, uh, armenia actually controlled all the regions of azerbaijan, we said, well, let's be move towards the normalization of relations. there are two districts that are in alibajak and, uh, to the south, so these are the corridors, but the large districts. yes, at what stage? uh, hmm, let's agree with the

azerbaijani side? give away five districts, but they are not needed senselessly, they are just empty. there , uh, the people are gone. in fact, they were published from these territories. there is no point in keeping them, but for communication with karabakh, uh, two regions are huge, by the way, it’s quite enough and hmm, we think that it would be fair to return it, refugees and so on. er, that would be a good step towards normalizing the situation in the region as a whole. well, uh, the armenian leadership went their own way. e, as you know, this is the situation that has developed today. now the question of regulating the peace treaty, our position is that this peace treaty is, of course, needed. and we support this uh peace settlement as well

as the delimitation. uh, something of a border and a complete settlement of the border issue. we are for this question. eh, which one? eh? which option to choose a business. uh, the armenia of the armenian people and the armenian leadership in any case, no matter which option is chosen. uh, if this leads to peace, we are only for, but we are not going to impose anything. we cannot impose on armenia and we are not going to dictate to armenia what this is? if the armenian people, the current armenian leadership believes that it is necessary to choose a specific version of this peace treaty for the so-called washington agreements, as far as i understand, it provides for us to recognize the recognition of azerbaijan's sovereignty over karabakh as a whole, but if armenia thinks so, please. we will

support any choice of the armenian people, if the armenian people and hmm armenia consider e, the armenian leadership believes that e karabakh has some peculiarities of its own. so it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities and somehow this needs to be discussed in the future in the contract. this is also possible, but definitely. uh, we need to negotiate with azerbaijan, it is necessary that these agreements be acceptable for, uh, the other side for azerbaijan. this is a very complex and frankly difficult question. but er, armenia is our strategic partner and ally, and we, of course, to a large extent, having in mind the interests. e, azerbaijan we will focus on what e will offer itself, armenia well, 2 years ago. uh, in our conversations, they spoke very highly of president

erdogan, that he does not wag his tail and is a real man. uh, in those 2 years a lot of things happened too. eh, your score remains the same. well, yes, he is a strong strong leader who is guided primarily, or maybe exclusively turkey's interests of the turkish people and interests. this is something of the turkish economy, to a large extent this explains its position on energy issues in matters of construction. let's say the turkish stream. we now proposed to create a gas hub in turkey for consumers in europe, the turkish side also agreed, of course, primarily based on their own interests. uh, it means that in the tourism sector there are many interesting things in the construction sector, there are a lot

of interests in agriculture. we have a lot matching vectors. e mutual interests and therefore president erdogan never allows himself to sit on his neck and uh and uh. to be guided by the interests of third parties, but he, of course, protects their dialogues with us. first of all, their interests and in this sense, turkey in general and president erdogan in particular are not easy partners. many decisions. mm, negotiations are born in such long and difficult disputes, but there is a desire on both sides to reach these agreements, and we, as a rule, these agreements are these agreements. in this sense, we achieve erdogan, of course, a consistent and reliable partner. here, perhaps, this is probably the most important

characteristic. he is a reliable partner. and he himself does not try to sit on your neck, for example, you know, i said that the president of turkey is not an easy partner, and he always defends his interests. well , not the personal interests of the country. uh, well, it's impossible to say that it is to sit on the neck. well, he’s just fighting for the decision that, in the opinion of his government of his advisers, is optimal . we are fighting to ensure that the decisions made are uh, and optimal for us. well, as a rule, i repeat, we find these solutions even on very sensitive issues. let's say in syria, yes, security issues. well, economics, including the institute so far. we managed to do it all again. once again, this is extremely important. at well, we understand that if we went through the difficult path

it was difficult to agree, but we agreed on something you can be sure that it will be done. this is the most important reliability and stability in these relations. diane jeleca thanks. my name is sri lankan. mr. president, they say that now russia is facing a proxy war that the west, the collective west and nato are waging with you by proxy. if so, this is perhaps the most serious threat russia has faced since 1941, then the great patriotic war began and the communist then leader of the ussr decided to establish a dialogue with the roc in order to create a broad front to defend russia could

you say that similarly, you could so to speak, return to this heritage, for example, to legacy of 1717 in order to take advantage of the old legacy that could be useful, for example, the legacy of the red army could, for example, take advantage of the help of communist elements, no matter how few they are in order for them to enter this broad patriotic front. thanks, my position is. my position is that i consider it necessary to use all of our historical heritage. i don't think you can give up on anything. there is nothing positive that happened in the history of russia it was connected with the tsarist empire, there were many positive things in the

history of the soviet union, and there and there had their drawbacks and problems. uh, they were overcome in different ways and had different consequences. as for the relationship of uh, it means with the left side of our political spectrum, uh, and uh with other political currents. you know, the peculiarity of today's russia lies in the fact that it is about the fight against external threats. we have almost complete consensus. yes, there are people who are absolutely pro-western, uh, who live so, mostly mentally. there families have their children study there. uh, so, well, yes, there is such a small part, well, it has always been and always is in all countries of nothing. well, in general, uh, very big uh, but we are a very large consolidation, regardless of the political coloring and views on

the way of development of russia itself well, people of communist beliefs believe that basically everything needs to be nationalized again there, and everything needs to stand from the state etc. yes, how effective it is. uh, well, it's hard to say in something e in something and somewhere in some in some particular historical situation. we don't give up either. we refuse. from this. we even have a nationalization law, but we don't do it. no, there is no need, but we proceed from the fact that it is necessary to use the most effective tools for the development of the country, market principles, well, under the control of the states, of course. state power under the control of the people and e, and using these advantages to direct them to the main goal of improving the

welfare of the country to combat poverty in e, expanding our efforts and achieving better results in the field of housing construction education health care addressing other issues that are extremely important for people. uh, so, uh, so uh, we're working. with respect, we treat those people who hold a leftist view, including communist beliefs on the soviet union, as it were rightly said, they themselves mentioned lived for a long time, uh. and under control, under the leadership of the communist party, now i will not go into details there, where there, what was it's good that you mentioned religious organizations badly, but we have them all, uh, we have four traditional religions. uh, everyone is extremely patriotic. as far as the russian orthodox church is concerned. she has always

been with her pasta with her people throughout history, the same thing is happening today. the key difference may be today in relations with confessions with our traditional confessions is that we not only outwardly, but essentially we do not interfere in the life of religious organizations. they are at we may be in a much more free position than in many countries that are considered democratic. we never exert any pressure, we believe that they are indebted to them, because during the soviet period their property was squandered, it was found out that they were sold abroad, there, and so on and so forth. that is , uh caused great damage to a religious organization, including the russian orthodox church. we try to support all our denominations. hmm, but we don't interfere with their work. and,

probably, this has never happened before, so that on the one hand, e was e hmm and there was such a general patriotic mood. related to the development of the country and within our state and related to maintaining our interests outside mmm, but at the same time we provide complete freedom, uh, their activities hmm and such a relationship is such a situation. it seems to me that it brings the results we need. well, remove rakhimov kubat rakhimov kyrgyz republic dear vladimir vladimirovich russia is indeed definitely the leader of the new anti-colonial movement also in everything

russia's adherence to traditional conservative prices is receiving a wide response around the world, but during the work of our valdai club. we saw a very serious request for social justice for a fair organization of social relations. how do you see it? how could the experts of the valdai club be useful? this is my first question and second question. and how do you assess the prospects for moving the capital of the russian federation to the center of the country, in fact, in the center of the eurasian continent in order to be closer to the countries of the shanghai organization cooperation. thank you for a fairer arrangement social. e of the social structure in russia, then according to the constitution of russia, it is a social state. and, of course, everything we do, all our national development goals,

are dedicated specifically to solving social problems. here, you can talk for hours. e time. even today it will not be enough, everything we do is aimed precisely at solving the social problems facing the russian state. and we have a lot of them, including many unresolved issues. i already spoke about it. i repeat once again, so we need, uh, to develop the economy, and on this basis to solve the issues of healthcare, education, technological development, change the structure of our economy, structural changes, the most important ones will not change the labor market, and in this regard. of course, we must think about those people who will be released from their old jobs. let's carry out retraining in new competencies and so on, therefore. and what about the valdai club? here, uh, gather experts from various uh, very different directions and hmm if at the

expert level, we will be prompted by development trends in key areas. we would of course be grateful er for having your opinion in mind when building our plans, considering. uh, that means your position on these trends, about which i have just mentioned, because , understanding what will happen tomorrow, we can and should build a policy today on the transfer. uh, capitals. uh, yes, such talk. we have hmm uh, well, we were once transferred to the collection, which means repeatedly. it was in the history of the russian state. uh, russia uh, as it were. historically, the mental center of russia is always associated with moscow and, in my opinion, some kind of necessity. there are problems in the development of the capital, like megapolis, and

i must say that under the leadership of the team of the current mayor sobyanin, they are solved much better. than in many other countries of the world and in many other metropolitan areas there was a period when there were growing, but they are also happy partly growing problems associated with transport. with development social infrastructure and so on, but still in recent years. uh, mayor sobyanin did a lot to occupy these uh these threats and vice versa to create conditions for uh, so that uh, muscovites and those who come to moscow for work or guests of moscow who come here for tourism purposes feel a lot has been done comfortably here for the development of the city over the past few years hmm well, this is the problem of excessive centralization of all, uh,

federal structures in moscow, it exists the same as in some other countries. for example, i, a supporter, did the same as in some other countries, namely to decentralize. and on specific plans for the construction of the supreme court. well , you need to do this slowly and calmly, creating from uh the judicial community favorable conditions for uh to work in the same st. petersburg and we will do it without any haste or fuss. uh, some hmm some some uh, big companies that, let's say, actually operate in siberia and

have their central government in moscow could have their headquarters there. by the way, this is what is happening. there will be ru-rushydr, for example, it settles in itself, in my opinion, in krasnoyarsk they, in my opinion, establish their headquarters there, and they equip the central authorities. could so some be aimed concentrated dispersed over the territory for the russian federation, this will only benefit both the management system itself and the region where they will appear. thank you so much ivan timofeev good evening ivan timofeev valdai club i have the following question regarding russia over the past year an unprecedented number of sanctions have been introduced. you mentioned the freezing of our reserves in europe for 300 billion. to this we can add tens of billions

of freezing the property of our citizens and our organizations . by the way, they are planning to confiscate this property, they are now developing it in appropriate mechanisms. well, in addition to this, a lot of things, and also financial restrictions, bans on the supply of goods to russia, technology of our oil, gas manipulation, and so on and so on, we all know this very well. and you mentioned this in your speech. our economy was expected to fail. she endured. to a large extent this has happened because the economy remains a market economy. it remains flexible. it remains an adaptive business. looking for new markets somewhere, perhaps looking for ways to import substitution, the government is taking a number of steps to to help businesses, but given the extreme conditions of foreign policy and those very sanctions, it may be time to take the path of

further regulation of the economy. you mentioned decentralization to reduce the number of checks, uh, reduce the regulatory burden. i would be very glad to hear your opinion on this matter. it's connected. uh, it's our choice, as in such cases, they say to reduce these number of checks. uh, get rid of excessive regulation by the state. so you know that scheduled checks have been stopped not only for smes, but also for large businesses, and we will extend. if it hasn't been said yet, i will. now we will extend this regime. oh, and for 2023. so, with regard to regulation, yes, this is the administrative guillotine hmm, as we said, it led to the fact that from above, in my opinion, thousands of acts were canceled there, and in their place, in my opinion, there will be less than 500 new ones . i hope

there are 400 with something new in modern ones, huh? here are the new acts that regulate economic activity, so we will continue along this path. of course uh hmm except for those uh industries that uh pose known risks to consumers. well, it seems to me for everyone, it's clear , uh, but here we will also try, uh, to build the work in such a way that all these relational functions are checked. uh, they are uh, violence, violence point character. wouldn't interfere, wouldn't interfere. e work er, enterprise hmm business in general. you are absolutely right in response to all sorts of restrictions that are being imposed on russia and the economy. and

you said that we were supposed to have something collapse was not expected, but the goal was to bring down the russian economy. well, it didn't work out. yes, it really has become and in this frame it is much more adaptive and more flexible . it turned out that our business is already quite mature and calmly intercepts. uh, those areas of activity are those enterprises, and, uh, which means that those of our partners who have decided to leave russia easily, are being vacated. our our business business takes and leads further those enterprises that have been quite recently. it seemed they couldn't to exist without a western presence is easy in almost all directions. yes, we understand and see the difficulties. mm medium term. we understand that we cannot produce everything. but do you know, uh, how i

talked to some of my colleagues this morning before you arrived? naturally. i spoke with everyone there in the government at the central bank. so in the administration, after all, our experts believe that this is the peak of the difficulties associated with e s hmm and with this wave of restrictions and sanctions, he passed. the russian economy as a whole has adapted to the new conditions, there is still much to be done in order to create new supply chains and import-to-export to reduce the costs associated with this, but on the whole the russian economy has adapted. eh, we will continue to develop on a more stable on a more sovereign platform, but the answer to all these challenges, of course, can and should be including, or maybe, first of all, bureaucracy and e work of the business,

supporting it and increasing . uh, magnification. uh, spaces of freedom for economic activity. so well, alexander andreevich you will not get around. very often foreigners ask us, but what can you offer russia to today's world, where are your nobel laureates, where are your great discoveries? uh, industrial scientific discovery, my colleagues often answer that, well, how about the great russian culture of pushkin, rubles, icon painting, individual russian architecture. they say, well, that's it, it's in the past, but today russia to offer today's world russia

today's world can offer a religion of justice, because this religion this feeling lies at the root of our entire russian culture , all our russian sacrifice, and today russia is making this sacrifice. she is essentially alone alone alone with the rest of the cruel western world is leading this fight for justice. this is a huge contribution to today's russia here in the context. uh world civilization world culture, because even those old traditional values, oh, which we spoke and the same ruble of russian icon painting and also amazing russian architecture, novgorod pskov and, uh, amazing golden silver age. all of them spoke about justice in the depths of russian civilization lies, er, lies justice, and so it may be that today's russian ideology is a religion of justice. uh, we have four

traditional denominations, the fifth will be enough for us. this is the first. this is a joke, of course, means about doing something, you know, uh, so i'm sitting at your work at your creativity, when well, there is time, with pleasure and read what you write. speak of course, i know that you are such a real russian patriot in the kindest good broadest sense of the word. uh, do we need to present something specially to someone? i'm not sure about this. you know what you just said about the fact that we, uh, are sacrificing something in our interests. e many other peoples. i'll argue with you here. we don't sacrifice anything. we are working to strengthen our sovereignty, this is in our interests. this is before

all, u strengthening on financial economic sovereignty, it will constitute will be the basis of the foundation for our future development of technological educational scientific what is, there and or not, e nobel laureates, then, uh. well, alferov, uh, made his invention, when, uh, means after 30 years there. or how many gave him a number? this is the case with the former president of the united states and beyond. e, means the nobel series. well, this is an indicator of some kind of achievement with all due respect to the nobel committee, this one and the owner. uh, means it's a wonderful nobel prize. unless this is the indicator, then science is developing. we must do everything to ensure that the

returns from both fundamental and applied science are many times higher for our development. and we will do it here today. there is a significant and noticeable renewal of scientific personnel. our science is becoming one of the youngest in the world. yes , of course, the same states. uh, i mean, uh its uh its competitive advantage in terms of a monopoly on uh, global finance is there like to pull out everything from all over the world with a vacuum cleaner, including scientific personnel for creative ones, well, of course. well , this will also end with the loss of monopoly on this for the dollar, as well as for the world currency. and this will also happen today. here, uh, you see, and here's what we do it is. very

attractive for many countries of the world and peoples, but our western so-called partners are doing everything in order to slander russia, humiliate her somehow ignore her interests. and when we fight for our interests and and do. it's openly honest, and, uh, and to put it bluntly, so courageous. that in itself, this fact in itself, this example is extremely contagious and attractive to billions of people on the planet. you look in many african countries in some countries. russian flags are now in latin america the same thing is happening in asia we have a lot of friends and we don't

need to impose anything on anyone just a lot of very many people and politicians and ordinary citizens. they are tired of living in some kind of external dictate. everything is already tired. they never see an example of our struggle with this dictator, they are both internally and externally on our side. and this support will only expand. now we talked a lot about science this time. in my opinion, there was one of the most interesting sessions, just about how to develop science and technology in these conditions, so i'm ruslan yunosov sitting in the hall. just painted a very interesting picture for us. thank you , today i represent the valdai club as racialists, vladimir vladimirovich you really said about science the right words. we see that over the

past 20 years, support for science has been serious. a mega-grant program has grown in russia that has made it possible to launch dozens, many dozens of modern laboratories in russia, we see this. however, on the other hand, what we see is how scientists we see that most of the professors who opened these laboratories never came to live in russia and work full-time, and you can even understand why it’s hard to compete here, you have a mega-grant for 5 years. and here you have a professorial position life. this is really a question, but on the other hand really. we discussed it at the session yesterday and our chinese colleagues have made a truly colossal breakthrough in science over the past 20 years. and today they occupy not just returned scientists. they returned them. they are number one in many areas. here we are dealing with quants, and i see what i want to say is that we know that the most powerful quantum computer today is in china and not in the usa the maximum number of patents is published in quants by china and not by the usa, on the other hand parties, of course, in russia we also have

programs that bring together many laboratories. the same quantum project. a quantum computer is a 20 scientific group of 15 universities, universities, institutes of the academy of sciences, but we have 5 years of planning. i think today we are faced with increased pressure. we really have a challenge to scientific and technological sovereignty and maybe this is the right time to start formulating strategic projects and make the horizon 10-20 years. thank you yes the higher the horizon the better the farther the horizon. better. this i agree with you. we need to look at the positive examples of other countries of our partner friends, including the people's republic of china, a lot has been done there in recent years, and under the leadership of the chairman, he pays great attention not only to the development of science, but to china as a whole. gnomes of china raising the standard of living of the chinese people, i know this, we are in good friendly relations. that's where

they get real results, of course, um. maybe the subject of our study and implementation into our practice. as for mega-grants, they really played a good positive role. and uh, the next step that we're implementing right now, it's not easy. uh, research and creation of separate laboratories. this is the creation of uh scientific, uh, communities of young scientists, uh, and uh in that. as a matter of fact, hmm, the future of these mega-grants. e. i agree with those who initiated this process, we are doing it, yes, narevich. here. well, we will continue to do so. uh you said no one came, some come and work. here, even if it is formally deducted somewhere out there eza. uh, abroad. hmm, most of the time he spends in russia there are quite a few of them, these are our former compatriots and and not only former

compatriots who are somewhere on the job, but come to work with us all the time, you know, and the world of science is the same as the art world it doesn't tolerate hmm uh artificial borders uh people should feel free and we won't lock anyone in here but we'll welcome anyone who wants to work in in russia, on the whole, we are succeeding in this, and we will continue to follow the same path to increase it. horizons planning. well, you're probably right. although we have e how many migrants for 5 years now? yes, you can, of course, extend them. these are questions. uh, questions questions, of course, uh, related to budget financing. but it can be done. eh, anyway. today we can expand these horizons, although here. uh, what did you uh say about the fact that somewhere there is a person working. uh, holds some kind of, uh, professorial position and this

life is not everywhere. why? you yourself are scientists, you know, there contracts were concluded for several years, the contract ended, goodbye. be healthy, that's why there, too, it's not all for life. hmm but to live, uh, in uh. hmm, in the uh space of your native language of your culture. it's for life, so uh, it's this freedom of choice that should be given to both children of culture and scientists . we must create conditions that are more attractive than, uh, those that are being created. uh, overseas. this is not an easy process. we we are following this path, we are achieving results and we will continue to move along it, including, you are probably right, and expanding the planning horizon. so bathroom my name is vanway. i work at a

chinese university university. i visited this time in russia more than 20 countries in russia up to 20 cities in russia and wrote a number of articles in order to show the real russia to china china many people love russia and you in particular. i want to ask. next question for sure. now you're under a lot of pressure on your shoulders large cargo. do you feel intimidated or maybe the excitement of the west russian fate has

created you, what do you want to say to the chinese people, and what can you say about the last ten years of russian chinese relations and what are your forecasts and expectations from the future of russian chinese interaction. thank you very much. when i work, i never think about some hmm historical accomplishments. i just proceed from what needs to be done and what cannot be done without. this is the most important thing, and in this sense, of course, the circumstances the country in which she lives she shapes any person, including me, of course it is. uh, as for the fact that we should be afraid of someone, of course, probably, many would now like to

hear me say, i'm afraid of the fight, but if i was afraid of everything, i would not do anything, and i cannot be guided considerations. e of this order in the place that i am doing, i should be guided by the interesting russian people of the russian state and this idyl. and i will continue to do what i think is right for the interests of his people and his country. as for russian-chinese relations, in recent years they have acquired an absolutely unprecedented level of openness, mutual trust and efficiency over the past decades. in terms of countries, china is our largest trading economic partner . we work practically, but not practically, but

really in all areas. and in the military sphere, exercises are constantly joint steam warfare in the technical sphere, and as confidentially as it can be never before in the history of our countries and and we didn’t work in the field of culture of humanitarian interaction in the field of economics, of course. well, russia’s biggest turnover is with china and it is growing. moreover, it is growing at a very fast pace and the pace - this was gained even before any restrictions and the distribution of our commodity flows towards asia, including towards china, we set certain tasks for ourselves together with hmm and my friend. eh, he talks about me like that, i consider my friend

a citizen, and for a certain level of goods turnover we will definitely achieve we are moving towards this at a faster pace than we even planned, with regard to our attitude towards china well, we treat as a close friend of some kind of chinese people with great respect for their culture and their traditions uh hmm and i'm sure that's building on that solid base. we are confident that we will move forward. regarding fears, professor ivan said this year, when since the spring, uh, the nuclear factor somehow arose, and you pointed out its presence in this way and, in general, very many zoned a little, remembering your remarks. right here, at our event 4 years ago, that we will all go to heaven

. we're not in a hurry, really. you are thinking, this is already alarming somehow, and i specifically thought that you were on the alert. effect achieved, i see thanks mohamed alexander kurdistan region of iraq i am very pleased to be here mr. president. i have a direct question for you on the topic of the injustice of the security of all, do you think that at this stage the kurds in all parts of kurdistan will achieve better security achieve more fairness in the future could you please have details on this issue. and as you said in

central america in africa, russian flags are everywhere, there are a lot of people who love russia and who support it. i want to assure you that the same can be said about the middle east, there are also a lot of people supporting russia or loving thank you thank you for the final part of your speech. uh, here, well, flags are present in european countries and in the states, by the way, we also have many supporters there. oh, by the way, in the united states it's very a strong part of people who adhere to traditional values, and they are with us. we know about it. uh, what about the kurds? i already spoke not only to the kurds, but in general to all peoples. of course, we should strive for a balance of interests only if a balance of interests is achieved, the world

can be sustainable, including this also applies to the fate of the kurdish people. so please go on. uh, here's mr. senior in my opinion, yes, if i'm not mistaken. thank you good evening konstantin old man republic of moldova i uh represent the parliamentary opposition of course the opposition because. well, our power. to the misfortune of our country, our people still prefer. uh, some other itinerary for my , uh, foreign trips. as a result, the lights in chisinau almost completely went out today, but, but this is not about that. i have a question, but at the beginning of the instructions, vladimir vladimirovich spoke so well about your family that i took the risk of having two children, they are 8-10 years old. they are students of the lyceum named after pushkin

in chisinau, they really asked me to say hello to you, and i cannot deny myself this fatherly little such pleasure. so, greetings to you from alexandra and gabriel from chisinau, now the question is, and in your speech you spoke about the inevitability of the emergence of new models of interaction between countries and regions. eh, maybe in this context it makes sense to return to the idea that you voiced back in 2001 about a single economic humanitarian cultural space that will e stretch from vladivostok to lisbon for us moldovans of different nationalities such a statement of the question. i would really like it , because it is always very difficult for us to choose between good and good between europe and russia and for us it would be a very promising

project, and, as it were, the light at the end of the tunnel, but is it possible in the world that we are going to build in the post-conflict world there in the world, in which there will no longer be the hegemon of the global policeman. and dominant powers thank you is it possible to create a single space of humanitarian economic hmm yes and a region in terms of ensuring the security of all who live on this vast mega-continent? e from lisbon to vladivostok, of course, yes, hope dies last. uh. these are not our ideas. this is an idea. hmm. and then, uh, they talked about it before the urals. it was me who later transformed this idea of ​​our french uh colleagues and former french leaders. e to vladivostok why because people from the urals also live the same culture? here is the same

most important thing on so, uh, today. yes , these complex, difficult tragic events are happening today, mm, but uh. but in general, why not? in general, it is possible to imagine this, i think so or else it will happen. i spoke about eurasia as a whole in my speech. i spoke about eurasia as a whole, including this european part , you know, but this is very important. it is very important that i really want to go back to my speech, so that this european part will regain its right to subjectivity. well, but this is it. well, how to talk, uh, with this or that partner, if he does not decide anything and on every occasion he has to call the washington regional committee and ask what can be done, and what can not? well it

as a matter of fact, this is what happens. i remember very uh such here difficult events around syria when they started, well, one of the leaders arrived. so i meet with him and agreed what we are going to do, how are we going to do it? specifically, this is what they did from us from moscow flew. returned to washington to paris everything is forgotten, as if there were no agreements. well, how to talk about what? and there were specific agreements right up to where the fleet will move there, what we will do, how we agree, we are against, or something, we agreed and agreed. deal. well, how does he talk? well, then what to talk to them? she generally directly call. what are you, is that all? i'm saying now, i'm not imagining anything.

you see, of course, europe defends its interests there, especially in the economic sphere. and even then it didn’t blow up very much. uh, gas pipeline systems. these are not ours, they are common european ones there in e. in the north. on stream one, five bright companies are represented. as if it were necessary. there is still enough impudence to show it there. or maybe it was russia that blew itself up blew up, russia went completely crazy. no, they still do. in my opinion, gazprom even published pictures of 2016, when under the gas pipeline system lies an american, in my opinion, explosive device, an explosive device. they said they lost it during the exercise. well, they lost. so right under e under the gas pipeline. uh, so it’s still

a device that came in, which, in my opinion, was intended to destroy underwater mines. listen, well, there’s no photo right here, it’s not world media, the media isn’t even broadcast. nobody repeats this. all of this is dying in the bud. no, neither on the internet, nor not, there is nothing on television screens. this is also the use of, uh, a monopoly in the media in order to promote the necessary information and kill everything that interferes with them, but it's there. but everyone is silent, that's why, of course, you need to create. this is a single space in every sense from lisbon to vladivostok but can this be done only with those who have the right to vote? i don't want if nothing to provoke, nothing to anyone offend, but as such, the real realities of today's life. here but it is nonetheless. in my opinion, from a historical perspective. it's possible i've already mentioned this. now i’ll say it again, once upon a time

the horse helmut kohl told me that the states will take care of their own affairs. hmm, sometime there, asia will develop powerfully in its own way . as the center of some kind of world center, then, of course, you need to be with russia. well, such was the position of gemotali in the current leadership of the federal republic apparently holds different views. but this is the choice of european countries. but i would like to go back to where you started from. you said that the lights went out there in chisinau, well, it's not clear. why did it go out, we definitely have nothing to do with this well, yes, you know why i am talking about this, because russia is always blamed for everything , somewhere the light went out, somewhere. uh, the toilet isn't working.

sorry, something else is to blame. russia, you know, remember this one in the famous film. and this man there is a chapel of some kind there 12, which century we also destroyed, but thank god. no means, but uh, i want to inform you. and that's what i'll say. what is called pure truth, but when they were negotiating with representatives of the moldovan government about gas supplies, did gazprom take an absolutely pragmatic one about gas prices? and the market position under the contract with moldova for the supply of natural gas means that the moldovan side did not agree with the position

of the gasma and insisted on price preferences. gazprom rested, so then mr. miller came out to me and stated his position and said that he considered his point of view to be correct. i asked him. to meet halfway the moldovan side, i mean the economic opportunities and financial opportunities of the moldovan state. i told him something valuable, although fair and from a market point of view, well, not uplifting for moldova if i couldn’t pay, what in this sense? he did not really agree with me, but listened to my opinion. gazprom went forward. government moldova and signed a contract for the supply of gas on moldovan terms on the terms of the moldovan side of the

moldovan government, there are many details. i just don't want to bore the audience, because it's not interesting to anyone but you . e with certain prepayments, but in general, in terms of price parameters, they completely met the moldovan side. well, you have to pay, of course, by itself. it seems obvious to me is why is it brought to the point that m-m light? no. well, it's already sorry they didn’t remember our problems, uh, about two months ago there was such an interesting or even less interesting episode when it turned out that when you were talking with president macron shortly before the start of hostilities, and

journalists were sitting in his office and on speakerphone. all this was broadcast. they recorded it all. well, such a somewhat unusual form, but okay. here you are to such things. this is not the first time you relate to such things . negatively, i believe that there are certain formats. uh, communication between uh, the heads of state and they must be observed otherwise there is no trust in what the partner is doing as a whole. there is nothing reprehensible here. this needs to be warned about. that's all. no big deal was warned. well, of course not, on the contrary. uh, when they go, uh, there are telephone conversations, including through closed communication channels, and we always proceed from the fact that these are confidential conversations. they coolness. uh, something is not owned or subject to publicity by agreement of the parties, if this is done

unilaterally. come on, it's not nice, of course. and now, when the macron calls, you specify who he doesn't have next to him? and why it was just worth it, because now i will say i proceed from the fact that someone is listening. clear. so uh, please, here's a guest in the front row from indonesia. thank you, thank you. mr. president. i really liked your speech. i think she brought us spirit. we can build together build stronger sounds like the motto for the g20. we hope you come next month on the internet, ask you about the title. today, the world after the behemoth of security for all, mr. cong

already said in 1955 that all security alliances for the world and china are on the security council. can you, uh, manage to get rid of the need together? is this a possible question? everyone loves you very much. in indonesia, everyone is always screaming. hooray uh, and i want to ask if it is possible to take a photo with you later with pleasure, such a beautiful woman with pleasure, means uh. we have had very good relations with indonesia throughout. eh, practically. well, all recent history and president fedot when he calls me, he addresses me with the words, brother. i tell him the same, uh, and hmm we cherish the relationship we have in indonesia. i'm grateful to the leadership and

the president for inviting us to the twenty. eh, let's think about how we will do it. russia will definitely be represented there at a high level, maybe i will go, while i think, here uh hmm in regards to uh in regards to creating new blocks in uh. in asia, in my opinion. this is an attempt to transfer to asia the failed system of bloc thinking from the atlantic region and without any doubt. this is a harmful undertaking, this is again, uh, an attempt. uh be friends with someone against someone in this case be friends. uh, against china. uh, we don't, uh, just don't support. here, uh, this is an attempt to

revive this or recreate now in the asia-pacific region what happened in the atlantic, but uh, we think that this is very harmful and a dangerous undertaking. well, it must be said that it must be said that this has adverse consequences both for the participants or for the allies. uh, in the same united states from which, as we know, they are taken away. uh, contracts for the supply of submarines, there's something else. uh, it’s just that nothing has been done yet, and the negative consequences, including for the allies of the states, are coming. and if this practice continues, the number of these errors and problems will only increase, of course, uh, we opposed the policy of this kind. so general sharma, i know i wanted

to ask you, right? uh, only the prize will come out in the world after hygiene is expected to play a role, india and india has traveled a colossal path of development from an english colony to its present state almost one and a half billion people, uh, and noticeable results of development, uh, cause universal admiration and respect for india uh , from the whole world a lot has been done in recent years under the leadership of prime minister fashion. uh, he is certainly a patriot

of his side. and this is his thesis case in india it matters both economically and morally india has taken great strides in its development. and, of course, she has a great future. eh, india is not only in the right of the border in that it is the largest democracy in the good sense of the word, but also proud of the pace of its development. e. this is an extremely important base on which india is developing, we have a special relationship with india caused or built on the foundation of very close allied relations over many many decades. we never had to this day none. i want to emphasize this never and no difficult questions. we have always supported each other. this is what is happening now, and it

will continue to be so in the future. now the pace of economic interaction is growing, eh, prime minister. e fashion asked me to increase. well , for example, as an example. um, well, first of all, there is an increase in trade in general, uh, but as an example, uh, prime minister. e vogue asked me to increase the supply of fertilizer, which is very important for indian agriculture, and we did it. what do you think, by how much six- tenths of the increase in the supply of fertilizer to india , not by any percentage, and all of us by six-tenths of this, it means that the trade turnover in the sphere has almost doubled. e purchase and sale of agricultural products. uh, we have an ongoing relationship in the field of military technical cooperation and the prime minister. e fashion, that person is one of those people in the world who are

able to pursue an independent foreign policy in the interests of his people, despite any attempts to restrain something to limit, e he you know how, like an icebreaker, it moves calmly in the direction necessary for the indian state. i think that countries like india hmm have not only a great future, but also an undeniably growing role in international affairs. sale is out of the question. i immediately remembered something about brazil, here is igor gilov, where he is sitting there. here, somewhere in brazil, by the way, we agreed on the supply of fertilizer. e, they will increase, but, unfortunately, it has slightly decreased. i don’t know why, maybe because of the logistics it is, in my opinion, a few percent notice deliveries have declined. so, but we

left somewhere. it doesn't matter, uh, i'll actually ask then. what i know, he wanted to ask, but here they have a choice. one of these days, literally, we, like lula , will probably return. you and him have a good relationship, we have a good relationship, and lulu's inflammation and we have a good relationship. e with the lord we do not interfere in internal political processes. this is the most important thing, we know that you are india, despite the acute political processes within the political consensus on cooperation with russia consensus on our interaction within the framework of the brix for us, this is of fundamental importance. we start from this. we also have, uh, a consensus on interaction with, uh, brazil. we consider it and brazil to be our most important partner in latin america. that is how it is and we will do everything to ensure that these relations develop in the future. since we went to brix, there was an initiative just a week

and a half ago that saudi arabia wants to join its support. yes, we support this requires a consensus of all countries brix but saudi arabia is hmm a fast developing country and not only because it is a leader in the production of hydrocarbons and oil production. uh, this is due to the fact that, uh, the crown prince has very big plans for the government of saudi arabia, which is very important under the hydrotification of the economy. there's a whole national development plan. e is laid out, therefore the direction. this i am sure that they will be and the energy and creativity of the hereditary principle is sure that they will realize these plans, therefore, of course, saudi arabia e. to be a member of large international organizations such as the brix and

such as the sco quite recently, we have determined the status of saudi arabia in the sco and will develop relations with this country both bilaterally and on multilateral platforms. and now they write in the west that there are a lot of people saying that vincentmann is hamid because of you. this is not true. so, ben salmanka, uh, a young man , uh, resolute with character. eh, that's an obvious fact. eh, he does not need to be rude and then in response you will not hear harsh assessments from his side. that's all, we must respect both the crown prince and saudi arabia itself. eh, and they will answer. the same the same will be answered by those who are rude to them. so muhammedjaveet. yes, as far as we are concerned. please excuse me, this is complete nonsense, because

in general the inheritance of the prince and that's it, but the saudi leadership. they uh are guided by their own emotional interests. and if we are talking about reducing or increasing production. mm, i know the crown prince already well, personally. ah, so i know what he's in charge of. so he guides, of course, national interests and the interests of balancing energy markets. in this sense, his position. i'm now saying, no kidding, it is absolutely balanced, it is aimed at uh, uh, the balance of interests, both producers and consumers. indeed, in the energy markets, it is not even the price that matters. ultimately , this is not what is important, it is the current economic or political situation for international energy markets that is important predictability. stability is what matters here is the hereditary principle,

this is exactly what he strives for and, on the whole , achieves what he wants. you won’t sit on his neck either. no , definitely not. so good mr. president, i send love and respect from islam hell. from a gentleman from uzbekistan thank you for your realizing a strong and complete analysis of what is going on my question is related to a very important factor also related to the history before world war ii. when jews were demonized by the us on the

rise? i specifically worked on a project that is related to valuation. several vices, for example communicate as, for example, before the second world war. secondly, everyone is trying to level it. this means that there is a need. how do you speak from the side of russia with the protection of the russian language issue with the russian language russians outside of russia

to create a counter plan to combat the rise. this is a serious threat and the last component. in ukraine , there are authors from various regions to fight. hearing your analysis - it's very serious europe is facing the rise of non-nazis. thank you. you know, it seems to me that one of these serious fundamental problems uh hmm those who supposedly care about the future of ukraine uh, the so

-called ukrainian nationalists. it lies in the fact that even the nationalist movement and the neo-fascist neo-nazi are merging, because they rely on those, uh, who cannot be attributed, uh, collaborators and nazis can never be attributed to those who, as i said, uh , on behalf of the nazi authorities, they destroyed the polish jewish russian population occupied during the second world war territory and e, it is impossible to separate today's so-called ura patriots and nationalists from bandera. it's basically the same thing here, in my opinion. there is one. uh, big problem really, and so, uh, when i say,

including our u western so-called partners. you look mm. uh, what is being done on the street in kiev there are other large cities, when, with a swastika, thousands of people walk the streets with a torch, there with torches and so on. uh, yes, we also have a possible manifestation of neo-nazism in all countries, it tenacious such an infection is tenacious, but we are fighting it, and there they support it at the state level. and this, of course, the problem is hushed up, but it exists and there is no getting away from it, because it exists. and well, today's hurray patriots themselves. uh, ukraine drives them. not these are not interests, even hmm not the idea of ​​nationalism. everything is very primitive and economic interests are hampered by the desire to keep billions of dollars in western banks, which they stole from the ukrainian people, hid them in

western banks and in order to ensure the security of their capitals to do everything that they are ordered by the west, and wrapping it in a nationalist wrapper and, e, presenting to their own people, as a struggle for e, the interests of the ukrainian people. that's what happens in reality, do not feel sorry for them. uh, they fight with russia until the last ukrainian loses places there. you know, here i am talking about this tenacious nationalism. and the fact that it is tied to neo-nazism, they try or prefer not to notice, and this, of course, is a huge problem for the current ukrainian regime itself and for those who supports unconditionally and uh, well, we ca n't ignore it and always will. he points to this, among other things, as one of the root causes of the current crisis. mr. kim, here's my name is

kim jong from south korea. this is the second time i've come to the altai club. i learned a lot. thanks for the great opportunity to hear a lot about safety.

i'll start with the last one. hmm, the transition to carbon neutrality is not against russian interests, because we have the opportunity to develop alternative species. e energy, including including hydrogen, including pure hydrogen, and here we have serious competitive advantages, including the possibility of using gas. well, there are many possibilities. it doesn't scare us. absolutely the opposite. hmm create an incentive for us to develop, but as a transitional energy source, primary gas is the best source of energy. uh, you can, if we talk about deep oil refining, then here we uh to a large extent, uh, we have the advantages that i just mentioned on our interests. this does not contradict our interesting in any way, only the bacchanalia in the

energy sector contradicts. uh, getting ahead of myself uh hmm uh uh addressing energy security issues related to providing uh green energy. well, how could it be possible for many, many years not to finance to prevent investments in traditional energy without preparing for this transition to everything related to e, green energy. well, how could this be done? this, to a large extent, is precisely what underlies today's crisis, because, uh, western politicians are just talking tongue in order to win over to their side. voters are frightened at first by ordinary citizens about possible climate change, then on the basis of this fear they begin to promise something that promises that cannot be fulfilled, they get votes. voters come to power, and then the house. and what is the return of coal generation going on now? to

heating oil so what? they chatted, but the result is something that is not in russia. we we are ready to supply gas. we're not ready to supply that refuse, here we are. uh, uh left after uh, the explosion of northern flows, one pipe works 27.5 billion cubic meters. we can pump, but they don't want to. we don’t want to do it here, we don’t have to, so, as for green energy, i repeat. eh, everything should be prepared in due time. here are the systemic measures that limit the development of traditional forms of energy. they led just to this serious e-crisis. well, there is no financing, banks do not give loans. not only uh, so there u european and in the states the same happening. why are there limited? yes, why banks do not give or insure the land, they do not allocate it, which means that

transport is not being built. e for oil and gas transfers these products and this has been going on for years. significantly underfunding of the industry is a deficit. it means that from the reserves of the e-state they allocate e-e oil strategically. ok then. well, they will then need to be replenished by experts. the market understands this, but today they took away a strategic reserve. well, i'll have to buy it tomorrow. we hear it will buy when prices fall, but they don't fall. and why hello, you’ve come to buy at high prices again, prices went up, but we are here, and these are systemic mistakes in the energy sector of those who should think about and deal with this. this is the first second about north korea and about taiwan

taiwan is without any doubt an integral part of the people's republic of china. we have always adhered to this position, and it does not change with us. uh, and here are all the provocative gestures associated with the visit. uh, taiwan's top officials of the united states are perceived in russia only as a provocation. why do they do it? i honestly don't know. you know, m-m, we are familiar with many here. for many many years, though, we speak, as it were, in the same language, but let's already do it quite like a family. well, what is happening is a tragedy in ukraine, right? that is,

the entire west has fallen upon us there, trying to destroy our economy with weapons. there they supply billions of ammunition to ukraine, they are fighting with russia. well, why do we need to spoil relations with china at the same time, but are they normal people or not? but it seems to be completely contrary to common sense and logic. why did this grandmother have to drag herself to uh, so uh, to taiwan in such a way as to provoke china into some kind of retaliatory action at a time when they and russia cannot settle in any way relationship because of what is happening in ukraine , well, nonsense some just well, it seems that there is some. a subtle deep idea, i think that there is neither shisha nor any subtle one. just nonsense and everything and self-confidence, you understand what's the matter,

self-confidence and a sense of impunity. this is what underlies such irrational actions. now, as for hmm, our position is clear, i have stated it. eh, so now what about? problems problems of the korean people's political republic's nuclear problem in my opinion, this is also a problem, after all. uh, you know what lies in the reluctance to talk? absolutely hmm , such a boorish attitude towards the interests of north korea , uh, including in the field of security, after all, there was a moment when almost everything was agreed. and north korean leaders agreed, in effect, with the

proposals. and with the proposals of the united states on how to resolve this problem, including those concerning, there is no nuclear component, at the last moment the american side changed its position and forced, in fact, the north korean leadership to abandon the agreements reached. well, they did something, there , additional sanctions began to restrict something in the field of finance and banking, although there was an agreement not to do this. why are you not very clear. by the way, we have joint proposals with the people's republic of china on how to move forward on the way to resolving this problem. and these proposals are formulated, er, in our two documents. eh, it's all good. it is known that we will adhere to the agreed position. by the way, speaking of hmm, by the way

, here's the thing about humanitarian issues, uh and things like that. e. here, too, it is necessary, as it were, to understand. what is the state of the north korean economy? the needs of ordinary citizens and not to tighten the screws, but to solve certain issues based on humanitarian considerations. and we also know that we have very good relations with the republic of korea and we have always had the opportunity to have a dialogue with both the republic of korea and the democratic people's republic of korea. but now we know that the republic of korea has decided to supply weapons and ammunition to ukraine , this will destroy our relations. and how would the republic of korea react to the fact that we started did you resume cooperation with north korea

in this area? would it make you happy? i ask you to pay attention to this. on the air of the big game today, president putin proposed to the world the philosophy of a new world order, he opposed the us -centric concept of a world based on rules, the concept of a world based on law and values, he opposed american exceptionalism and the concept of a world based on the equality of countries and peoples. he contrasted culture, abolition a culture of universality, which has always distinguished our russian culture, and what distinguishes the culture of all great civilizations. it really was

a keynote speech by the president, which, as the press secretary said, will be many more. uh years and months to study and quote. it's really. so putin's speech was broadcast by many miro media, and not only in the east, but also in the west, this is really a new vision that putin offered to all mankind and launched into the presidency. generally. e quite. in my opinion. it is clear from those questions that represent the quintessence of the western approach of the modern world with the concept of a world based on rules, which are now being put forward as the main doctrinal setting, of the west, and this is what president putin said. i hope you did not regret that you came to russia and communicate with each other friend. i am glad to

see you all at the valdai club site. we have talked more than once about the major shifts that have already taken place and are taking place in the world about the risks associated with degradation world institutions with the erosion of the principles of collective security with the substitution of international law for the so-called rules. i wanted to say, it’s clear who invented it, but uh, perhaps this is not accurate, it’s generally not clear who invented it. uh, on what, uh, what are these rules based on? uh what's inside of these, apparently there is only uh, an attempt to approve one rule, so that uh power holding now in power they said, i'm talking about global power. e, had the opportunity to live without any rules at all and everything was allowed to them e everything would get away with, no matter what they did. here, in fact, these are the very rules that we are constantly talking about as the people say , that is, they constantly talk about it. well, in

fact, there is only one rule. yes, dmitry vyacheslavovich suslov, with the host of the big game, was in the hall as a member of the valdai club. well, i completely agree. uh, first of all, with the president's assessment of what a rules-based world is. this is western hegemony. this is dictation. this is a unipolar dictatorship. and where is the west acting as it pleases and some rules formulated, but they are constantly changing to please. uh, the west itself. yes, that's beneficial for the west, let's say , to maintain the gold standard within the british in a narrow system. it is supported then it ceased to be profitable and now the favorable wto rules change well , then it means yes, and then the wto rules cease to be beneficial for the united states it becomes beneficial for china so we refuse these rules, we offer something different illustrations of the world based on rules. this is the bombing of yugoslavia. this is the iraq intervention

destruction. libya, that is, indeed, the arbitrariness of the west in world affairs. this is the main source of world instability, but i fully agree, vyacheslav alekseevich, with your assessment that putin's speech is not only criticism. well-deserved criticism from the west. but this is about creation. he really drew a line under the failed unipolar world order and, uh, proposed the contours of a new more just multipolar world order and proposed the principles on which this new multipolar world order there must be a world order, and it is based on such principles, indeed, as diversity, as the freedom of choice by all countries of their development models. so putin opposed unification in every sense, both in economic and in value and in political unification of this world based on the rules of western dictatorships and diversity and justice in many ways. peace,

diversity, and in terms of economic development of reserve currencies, diversity in terms of civilization and values, so that each country has sovereignty and the opportunity to choose models of your own development, both as a participant in the valdai and valdai club and as a participant in this conference for four days, i can say that it is this vision that is simply welcomed by the world majority, which was just presented. uh, in the hall. it seemed to me very interesting that in his speech the president several times appealed to the authority of our classics. what are the most different eras, uh, and philosophers and writers and dostoevsky and yes, nelevsky and solzhenitsyn and even lenin, here is solzhenitsyn, he remembered in connection with russian self-understanding. west, listen to what the president said on this score. i will quote from the famous harvard speech of

alexander savich solzhenitsyn back in 1978. he noted that the west is characterized by a continued quotation of a dazzling superiority. this is what is happening so far, which continues to support the idea that all vast areas on our planet should develop and develop to the current western systems of seventy eighth year. yes, nothing has changed. over the past almost half a century, this blindness, about which solzhenitsyn spoke frankly russian and not near colonial in nature, has already acquired simply ugly forms, especially after the so-called polar world arose, that i want to say confidence in this its infallibility. this is a very dangerous condition. it is one step from it to the desire of the infallibles themselves to simply destroy those they do not like. well

, really agree that this approach characteristic of the united states in relation to all civilizations, moreover, ancient civilizations with colossal e, there are historical roots of tradition. er, well, just a great story. yes, they are trying to impose this american experience here. uh, like some kind of universal that simply humiliates people humiliates peoples. you know, it's just e ignorance, not informed western people, but about the history of world civilizations, really was not. you see, uh, there was europe, uh, then america was opened a little. and what was there? e behind this great wall no one knows and does not want to know, therefore, this is what they proceed from, and they, out of habit, look at india in china but this huge district of white

east asia is like this, from above. down from the stern of the ship, which has just fired from long-range guns in the canton, it floats and fires at tien, then we swim to the petropavlovsk-kamchatka euro and fire at it. eh, it goes on. only now they are standing at the stern of the aircraft carrier and i think that everything will be so. e. i think that in the near future they will have to somehow expand their knowledge. e world culture. uh, what putin said about the end of the unipolar world is a medical fact. uh, this point of view is the same as the point of view of both beijing and the case and others. uh, here's the stake holders. yes, those who play the big game. you know, once i had a very well- informed american professor who also said. and what, in fact, is there in the rest of the world. and what is actually there, but if there is

something interesting, we'll buy it, that's actually and that's it. yes, it's really american the approach is so very arrogant and very russian and very u so two-sided yes, that is, this is the approach of a loser who actually has a really printing press, but if the dollar also starts to sag the position of the dollar and putin in my opinion. he expressed a very, in general, such a non-trivial thought that, in general, the very institute of international reserves has been discredited, that is, and the point now is to accumulate reserves. yes, in dollar e dollar pounds. eh if at any moment, it just might to be frozen or whatever ursula fonderland said that it was simply necessary. take away from russia yes, despite the fact that there are no e reasons for this. listen to what putin said about the discrediting of the dollar. russia considers inevitable

the formation of new international financial platforms, including for the purposes of international settlements. which platforms should be outside of national jurisdictions be secure depoliticized automated and not depend on any single control center. it is possible to do this or not? of course, yes, it will not require efforts to combine the efforts of many countries, but doing this can eliminate the possibility of abuse. in the area of ​​the new global financial infrastructure. it will allow you to effectively, profitably and safely manage international transactions without the dollar and others. the so-called reserve currencies, especially since using the dollar as a weapon, the united states yes and the west as a whole has discredited the institute of international financial reserves. first, they were devalued due to inflation in the dollar and euro zones, and then tsarap pocketed all of our

gold and foreign exchange reserves. the transition to settlements in national currencies will inevitably gain momentum. you know it is noteworthy that in his speech in response to the questions of uh putin a-a very balanced, let's say. uh connected two things on one side. this economic sovereignty is economic sovereignty, but it has been emphasized several times that the global new financial system should be built taking into account, and respect for the national economies of the economic sovereignty, and on the other hand, and those achievements of globalization that the world today enjoys, that is, this is international trade. this is an international financial market. these are international financial calculations, and what was very important was what was in his answers. eh, i would even

say so, but more dominated, and the wording of the global financial system. rather than some new international monetary system. he later mentioned it, but still dominated the finances of the system. he says what about what, uh, first of all, he he understands this perfectly well that today's guarantee of effective e, arrangement of international settlements rests on a set of measures, not only in e-e national currencies, which, as he said, can indeed become the basis for the development of this alternative financial system. e monetary system is financial, but still on the creation of new financial relations, the ability to exchange financial resources with capital investments and loans. he sounded the phrase about, that, i pass the creature. uh, so to speak, either reform or to create a new international financial system, meaning those institutions that, as it were, we all know, were created within the framework of this russian system and the same world bank, and the international monetary

fund, which is noteworthy, he, so to speak, added here the world trade organization without naming her, but he spoke regulation. it is not a claim institution. but it is an integral part of that system. the dollar-centric one that was built and, uh, understanding these subtle interlacings, really says that uh there is a very clear understanding that without joint efforts, but in fact, in fact, i heard. well, maybe i heard what i wanted to hear. here, uh, i heard that after all, our path and an alternative international agreement, uh, which will allow, based on our confidence and the economies that unite us, to find that instrument of calculation without undermining. and most importantly, not creating this one does not turn this tool into a weapon for someone. this is the main thesis that, probably, had to be made. well, i must say that today the world bank. e is inferior to, say, the asian

development bank in terms of the amount of funds that it provides for development purposes, so the west as a financial center will further and further fade into the background. naturally this process. the fast but certainly the center for world economic development is already in east asia , it is there that the engine of world development is located, and the west acts as a brake that actually prevents the rest of the world from developing with its sanctions, and russia here proposes to get out of this west centric dollar-centric e financial e, a bag in which essentially the entire world economy turned out to be about what else putin and russia offer the world immediately after a short advertisement. free vtb debit card with 2% cashback in

popular categories plus 1,000 rubles. after the first purchase. order on vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will turn out new national winnings for victory or many serious prizes, you still want to win millions of tickets by mail from partners and to the national lottery. new era of the lottery. enjoy the winter and feel confident in frosty weather in stylish and warm jackets from adidas buy with discounts on wildberries joints become an obstacle for a comfortable life. take advantage of ambena preparations, which bioactively solve joint problems and take care of you, as the closest amp preparations to an active joint, and now many people put your life on pause due to rising prices with a sovcombank loan, make important purchases at

today's prices and turn back on all your sovcombank plans people are more important sale 11 11 on yandex market big sale big discounts here i bought goods for the whole family. everything was brought to the house cosmetics stage. i wanted outrageous. i took a dream tool with a split, to pay then buy delicious ice cream on yandex.market with discounts up to 70%. cinema

1tv presents a wonderful soviet district italians offer us a job, when the center is time, let's do it again. i didn't understand something. citizen belsky betrayed his homeland, his family from the closest people, dads, we love each other. we want get married and you have to accept it. do you want it or not? if once again i see your son near my daughter, you will not only have to look for another job in another city to live. no, of course, then come to me tonight home father leaves on a business trip for two days the anatomy of the heart. why are you talking to me like that? you have all the signs of pregnancy, 1tv movie

presents what is dear? plastered rollercoaster premiere of a serial film passed the movie 1tv presents go away, please.

we are discussing in the big game vladimir putin's keynote address at the valdai forum. he proposed a truly new philosophy in the modern world order. and uh, he answered a lot of questions that, in general, concern the whole world. and, of course, russians too, including he gave the answer to the question. well, what happened in relations with the west because of what, uh, they reached such an uh, acute point, and who is to blame? yes, he explained that, in fact, behind this lies the desire of western countries to turn russia into an instrument for achieving their own interests. we tried to build relations with the leading countries of the west and with nato, the message was the same. let's stop being enemies. let's live in peace. let's have a dialogue to build trust, and hence

peace. we were absolutely sincere, i want to emphasize this, we clearly understood the complexity of such a rapprochement, but we went for it. and what did we get? did you get a short answer? there is no possible cooperation in almost all the main areas. we got a constant growing pressure on us and the creation of hotbeds of tension among our mycelium borders lets ask this pressure what is it? well, how to train so simply or what? well, of course not. the goal is to make russia more vulnerable, the goal is to turn russia into a tool to achieve their own geopolitical goals. here. well, as a matter of fact, everyone is trying to turn this universal rule into a tool in order to use these tools for their own purposes. yes

, this is true, i completely agree with the president, because after the end of the cold war. well, the truth, uh, they themselves gave a reason uh count us. uh, well, let's just say tools, we are by no means uneven, all these, you remember, kozyrev's statements about the absence of national interests that yeltsin is there in the united states congress bless america , we need to learn from the west all these. uh, let 's just say the not very not very thoughtful steps e of the russian leadership instilled confidence in the leadership of the united states in particular that russia can be controlled, there was talk. why do you need nuclear weapons? i remember there uh, deceased senator kennedy at one of his hearings, i don't understand him at all. why does russia need nuclear

weapons? when was the question asked? well, what about the united states. why is it? how can you compare? we have a global responsibility, that is, uh, they have a global responsibility, and russia generally went out for a walk like that, therefore, uh, even when uh, president putin came to power, uh, there were also attempts and the rome declaration and our relations uh with nato and the americans, we rubbed everything. come on , you guys, what are you all competing with us. we are no longer enemies. we are already partners and will become a little more strategic there, then there is not far off the day when she will turn into allies in general, so sit down and, uh, don’t rock the boat. i remember even er, well, when the process of nato expansion began, when we agreed on the founding act, but it would seem even simpler, that's what the americans said. here, let's write it down. you will not place nuclear weapons on the territory of the new members, but it seemed to us that this is perfectly natural. absolutely no. we don't want to be

bound by anything. no, plans, no, no intentions necessary everything that was written in the founding mother, so uh, uh, what happened, then in the seventh year, well yugoslavia our best efforts. here, in kosovo, we say, well, we are close serbs. give us a sector, we will provide right serbs no, russia is not worthy of a separate sector. here, go to german to american you so that you are in control as a result. we left kos. after the advent of e, when did vladimir vladimirovich become president? they also tried, uh, to establish some kind of interaction with nato, they got complete rejection at last. the speech in munich of the seventh year, which dotted all the e and e, it became clear that russia has no desire to turn into an instrument and will not turn into

an instrument. with western, western plans and their implementation, the americans are trying to impose their will and their model on the rest of the world, but the question is really. and what can they actually offer something to the rest of the world, because, if well , before, everyone there was talking about the american democracy of some e some american values, who immediately burst it all, like excruciating bubbles. they accidentally putin e, drew attention to the fact that, in general, it turns out that the americans have nothing to offer. listen. all this without exaggeration, not even a systemic hell doctrinal crisis of the neoliberal model in the american world order, they have no ideas of creating positive development. they simply have nothing to offer the world, except for maintaining their dominance, i am convinced that real democracy is in a multipolar world. first of all, it assumes opportunity for any nation. i want to emphasize this

for any society of any civilization to choose its own path, its own socio-political system, if the united states has such a right, the eu countries, then the countries of asia certainly have it, the islamic states of the monarchy of the persian gulf, the states of other continents, if, of course, and in our country in russia and no one will ever be able to dictate to our people. what kind of society and on what principles should we build? well, uh, really. uh, the united states wasn't. and now they are no longer benevolent hegemon, but there was the idea that the united states is a benevolent hegemon that offers its satellites development security and those countries that participate in american hegemony. they acquire these benefits in response to a certain renunciation of the autonomy's sovereignty, but now we see that since the united states itself is the epicenter

of the global crisis and the united states itself is trying to strengthen and improve its position at the expense of, among other things, its allies and even more so the rest of the world what suggest, the united states of the main world is the whip sanctions threat secondary sanctions suppression punishment. yes. see how the united states reacts to the behavior of saudi arabia is absolutely normal, but in the interests. there is no stability in the global energy market, we will reconsider and punish and now we will choose how saudi arabia , e.g., punish and so on. that is, indeed, because the united states has nothing to offer. they try at the expense of the remnants of their e at the expense of the remnants of those tools that provide them. uh, dominance of the dollar, first of all, but uh, punishes other countries, but in this uh segment that you quoted vladimir putin,

it seems to me that the absolutely key thing is that the new world order should be based on the right of everyone to choose their own path, to respect any civilizational cultural historical any diversity - any diversity, and for the united states, the ideology of which is based on the idea of ​​exclusivity. and that's the american model, it is the only correct and at the same time universal is unacceptable for them and precisely. there is such a fierce struggle against this. well, i must say that with its pressure the united states acts, of course, often against saudi arabia's own interests, in my opinion, they have completely played out. and putin said today that russia will support the membership of saudi arabia in the brix and the idea that was expressed by south africa and i am sure will be supported. and why not support india, why not support brazil or china? i think that there will be a consensus here, and china, by the way, today the chinese ministry of

foreign affairs also released, uh, a statement that they are fully supported, in my opinion, they have already launched. uh, uh, putin also talked about this, that they began to put pressure on china, yes. this grandmother went to taiwan, i mean, dancy pilose, just at the moment when, it seems, they had to be friends with china against russia, which is absolutely crazy, they really rallied. e russia china like never before and really nothing offer, in addition to sanctions and the culture of cancellation, and putin also spoke about this. this is really very important. in my opinion, the idea is in his speech. here he even used fyodor mikhailovich dostoevsky, whom they also tried to ban. listen to what the president said. at one time, the nazis reached the burning of books, and now western parents have slipped into the prohibitions of dostoevsky and tchaikovsky, liberalism and progress, the so-called culture of abolition, but in fact we have already

talked about this many times about the real abolition of culture. uh, it mows down all living creative things, it allows me to develop free thoughts in any of the areas , neither in economics, nor in politics, nor in culture. liberal ideology itself. today has changed unrecognizable if originally classical liberalism. i understood the freedom of every person. how is the freedom to speak? whatever you want to do, whatever you want, then already in the twentieth century, liberals began to declare that they had a so-called open society. there are enemies, it turns out, of an open society, there are enemies, and the freedom of such enemies can and should be limited or even cancelled. now they have reached the point of absurdity, when any alternative point of view is declared subversive propaganda and a threat to democracy. that's what does not come from russia. this is all

the machinations of the kremlin really, we are so almighty that any criticism addressed to our opponents is perceived as the hand of the kremlin as the machinations of the kremlin. well, this is some kind of nonsense. yes, what did they roll down? well , at least move your brains somehow more interestingly something to state your point of view. state it somehow, conceptually, you can’t blame everything on e, on the intrigues of the kremlin, all this was prophetically predicted by fyodor mikhailovich dastoevsky in the 19th century, one of the characters in his novel the possessed by the nihilist shegalev, and this is how he described the bright future he invented. quote coming out of boundless freedom, i conclude with boundless despotism. by the way, this is what our western opponents came to in the toilet, another other character

in the novel, pyotr verkhovensky, arguing that a widespread betrayal of the denunciation of espionage is necessary, that society does not need talents and higher abilities and further on cicero's tongue is cut off copernicus ' eyes are gouged out shakespeare is stoned. well , this is what ours comes to. western opponent you know, in fact, you can turn a great power into an instrument of your interests, and the americans actually succeeded, here is the former with my beloved country from china yes, look at the seventy-ninth year, china is writhing from the poverty of the devastation that was left after the cultural revolution big. leap good fellows at home flies to america and asks for help with technology markets with money. and they say to him okay, but he needs

entrance fee. entry fee china attacks vietnam and conducts a border war after that, everything is really provided to china and for 30 years. china is starting to develop according to western standards, and it really gets everything technology markets money. it develops so successfully that it still remains. with an increased product, a surplus product, please put it in our bank. yes, and there is now a trillion accumulated public money and two trillion more private money. but gradually, it means that the chinese came to himself, but and by the time the dolphin came to power. he began to abandon politics, dennitsiatin and the americans. everything became clear 5 years ago after the 19th party congress, when he

confirmed the correctness of this patriotic nationalist project for the great revival of the chinese nation and approved it. return to socialist values. what was america's reaction a few months later, the cold war began, first the trade war sanctions the eighteenth year, uh, then uh, china's worldwide spit on about the coronavirus? the hong kong crisis and china's opposition to taiwan began, they had an excellent relationship. they soul to soul lived traded. uh, they exchanged all sorts of cultural values ​​there, yes, and uh, here. uh, now what we see is that the twentieth congress was held, which confirmed that china will go even further along the path of socialism.

confirmed the powers of the middle, what can be expected now a new round of educational work, but in the round of sanctions, provocations and all that other chinese culture, without this, simply nowhere confucius is forbidden and so on. that is, with regard to chinese culture, it will be the same as what is being done in relation to russian culture. in response to this already now, simply the matrix of american behavior , it must be said that our president made a number of very important statements and when answering the questions of the valdai club participants, which we will talk about immediately after the advertisement. free vtb debit card with 2% cashback in popular categories plus 1000 rubles after the first purchase. order on

vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out with the day birth. buy sweets, princely and win millions of rubles magnet notes. only even faster, but you can connect, only our internet is faster than the fastest. try for free only in megafon sale 1111 on yandex.market big sale big discounts. here i bought goods for the whole family. they brought everything to the house. i wanted an outrageous tool, then buy it on yandex.market with discounts up to 70% on yandex.market

. no she's back sale, 11 11 on ozon only from november 11 additional, ending for 199 rubles. vitamins of group b for 259 rubles. buy this credit card. shoot. transfer 120 days without interest for the first time ever stick - it's not a problem. i spent a month instantly, the washing machine broke down, the microcircuit burned out. it's not a problem. where there are no problems 120 percent for everything, rosbank presents the real possibilities of tele2 as the content of subscriptions is an illusion of an offer. it does not take into account individual

preference. welcome to the real world. we in tele2 we let you collect a subscription yourself this unique offer pay only for the selected content and this analogues. and a subscription mix can even be purchased not by our subscriber. only selected services in the subscription mix on the birthday of the housing lottery are guaranteed to raffle off an apartment for 30 million. buy a ticket everything can come true. open the door to your dream absolutely everything for your beauty in the mobile application l'etoile cleansing pads for 649 rub. pinchatka for 3.990 dishwashing tablets for 249 and even an irrigator for 290 absolutely everything for your beauty and not only in the application l'etoile so treat a cold. an innovative drug for the treatment of respiratory tract infections and the prevention of bacterial complications has a single antiviral and antibacterial action naro-fomin allows you to return to your

usual life rabbi against viruses against bacteria strength in the unity of action. money is being transferred from your account. urgently report the pin code to stop the operation. well, now it's the defenders. i interrupted the call. these are scammers. order a sim card on the tinkoff dot ru website and get the most effective protection against spam and scammers. it is such a natural product, because it is made from quality milk with any care or could buy cheaper. we continue to discuss in a big game of the keynote speech of

vladimir putin, who today proposed a new philosophy of the world order, and gave answers to many questions that are now being heard in our country all over the world, one of these questions was asked by an indispensable participant in many of our programs. e ivan saranchuk, listen please explain, vladimir vladimirovich, the world is indeed on the threshold of the possibility of using nuclear weapons, and how will russia behave in these conditions as a responsible world and nuclear power. thank you . look, as long as nuclear weapons exist. there are always dangers of their use. the first second goal of today's fuss around nuclear threats and the possible use of nuclear weapons, it is very primitive. and i'm hardly mistaken if i say,

what is it? well, i have already said that this is the dictate of western countries. their attempt to push all participants in international communication, including neutral or friendly countries, ends with nothing, and they are looking for additional arguments in order to convince our friends or neutral states that we all need to resist russia and a. ah, provocations with nuclear weapons, pumping up the possibility of the thesis itself, the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia is set to be used precisely to achieve these goals to influence our friends, our allies, to influence neutral

states to tell him, look, what kind of whom you support there, what, uh, russia is a terrible country. you don't need to support it anymore. no need to cooperate with her, no need to buy anything from her. you don't have to sell them anything. actually this is a primitive primitive purpose. yes, it’s really like that, all these here, we’ve been talking a lot lately, about this impending provocation with a dirty bomb, but a dirty bomb is so you know, this is an everyday expression, and implies something done on the knee. and i want to tell you that e in the fifties it was in ukraine e. the soviet union, in general, worked out a program for the use of radiological weapons. this is a highly active radioactive waste from the nuclear industry, dissolved in acid. and at the base. how would they do yuzhmash. uh, well, on the basis of the medium-range r2 rocket, two warheads were developed. they were called geranium-generator and

earlier - this is one container, and several containers of the generator, which independently burst above the ground and infected the area. so that's what's here information about which the ministry of defense began hmm to inform the international community. from a few days ago and the minister of defense chief of the general staff in their conversations. uh, and what became known today is that, uh, these preparations for this provocation have come to the final part. they imitate the iskander missile in order to intercept it, supposedly over the chernobyl zone. all the same, it’s not a pity, even though there is ukrainian territory, but god bless him and u start this tantrum for under, of course, he admits that this is a russian rocket and uh, really. eh, everything. this is aimed at presenting russia as some kind of monster, which is incomprehensible for what, because military

expediency is zero. why did i test, or rather use nuclear weapons, well, ukraine, when we are completely different from what we do not lose. we, uh, are standing, so to speak, but on the threshold. i hope our offensive, so uh, i think that's what the department of defense and today our president - this is once again explained to the whole world. i think it will stop, uh, these madmen, who for sure they act not just independently, but with approval . and maybe even with the help of the same americans and the british, a world record has been set against russia for the number of sanctions imposed against any country in the history of mankind . in my opinion, the number of these sanctions and naturally raised questions about the impact of this on the russian economy. and here's what the president said. in response to all sorts of restrictions that

are being imposed on russia and the economy. and hmm, you said that it was not supposed that something would collapse in our country, but the goal was to bring down the russian economy. well, it didn't work out. yes, it has become valid in this and the rights are much more adaptive more flexible it turned out that our business is already quite mature and calmly intercepts. uh, those areas of activity are those enterprises, and, uh, which means that those of our partners who have decided to leave russia easily, are being vacated. our business takes and leads further those enterprises, which are quite recent. it seemed impossible to exist without a western presence, easy in almost all areas. yes, we understand and see the difficulties. mm medium term. we understand that we cannot produce everything. but you know, uh, as i did this morning, i was just

talking to some of my colleagues before you arrived. naturally. i spoke with everyone there in the government at the central bank. uh, so in the administration, our experts believe that this is the peak of the difficulty associated with uh, with this shaft restrictions and sanctions it is passed. the russian economy as a whole has adapted to the new conditions . this is shown by the numbers, which means, firstly, the latest data from rosstat suggests that inflation, if we consider it at producer prices, has not been decreasing over the past month. it has been effectively denied, well negative below, while inflation, retail consumer prices, er, are actually standing still. and now for the first year. our inflation rate is less than 11%, so for the time being i am a foreign expert, based on previous estimates puts us somewhere on the order of inflation per year of

13.7%, but i want to remind you that without any sanctions in the uk and the european union it is under 11%, which means that there are no sanctions in germany, the latest data on the growth rate of producer prices and there are almost 46% 46% growth here, again, quite recently the figures were shown by the verstat just the other day, yet another statistics of the financial results of russian enterprises. uh, plus 18% from the previous period. uh, that is, the economy runs in profit. and therefore, certainly for today day to talk about a torn economy in the event or some kind of failure of the results achieved. uh, the authors of the sanctions, in general, it is not necessary, especially since we are now seeing sustainable exports. we see that imports are gradually starting to catch up. but one way or another, that is, in fact, trade

relations are being restored, and logistics is being restored. well, ah, but i have already spoken about this many times, that in fact, in fact, economic sanctions for a country like carp, no matter what they sometimes say to us there accused of having too much. uh, raw-material orientation of the economy, in fact, we have a fictitious economy. and of course, economic sanctions, they are generally meaningless, because they just clear away. as said. the president. they simply clear the field for russian business and russian business gradually occupy these niches. a and the continuation of the previous topic. eh, it seems to me that this one is really an attempt to find restrictions for our country by any pretext. they are also defined by the fact that they perfectly understand that sanctions don't work. and you need to find another queue, another reason of some kind, in order to somehow limit it. well, i hope it's like this, in the first place, it doesn't happen. but, and secondly, it is still valid for this year. and even in a itself, with

a big skeptic, it was shown that the russian economy is much stronger than it was before. dmitry vyacheslavovich you are an insider. you are a member of the valdai club, a participant in this meeting. eh, here. well, i remember, because the nineteenth meeting is the first valdai meetings. there, basically there was a representation from the western. yes states. right now, the situation has changed dramatically for americans in general no that is, well, 41 countries, however, the geography has expanded significantly. and, of course, the nature of the discussions and the nature of perception have also changed. this is how it feels from the inside it feels from the inside, so firstly, but the world majority was represented, that is, not the western part of the world east uh, south, second, but amazing uh, the degree of sympathy for the fact that russia does. now, in fact, it was even sometimes surprising that we often discuss around this

table that russia is the pioneer of that world anti-geminist revolution. what is happening now, what is being done by russia is being done in the interests, in fact, not only of russia but also of the rest of the world of that same world majority. that's all. this is fully accepted, welcomed and discussed by the participants of the valdai club and one of the requests that was formulated in relation to russia and, by the way, the president responded to this the question is, what is needed for russian intellectual leadership and conceptual leadership to shape the new multipolar world that is now being created on the ruins of american hegemony and president putin is very much. uh, here said and variety and right. uh, the peoples of the states independently determine the model of their development. this is exactly what was being discussed. uh, in the course of the own titles of the discussion was the world after

hegemony, and today. i think everyone felt that after the hegemony the world is, it got better and it getting better. in fact, many are frightened by the changes that are taking place in the world, because they are used to living in such a western-centric dimension in a western-centric world in a world where america is western countries. here they determine the direction of the movement of mankind. but it has not been so economically for a long time. naturally. the east is now much stronger than, uh, the united states of america, or even more so europe politically , these countries are much more stable militarily, as we are now finding out. well, uh the west turned out to be, even there, providing colossal assistance, but it is now obviously not wealthy and the military lag behind the western state at the same time, here in the world that represents the vast majority of humanity. well, at least 7 billion out of eight who live on

earth have ideas that the president of russia expresses which we are discussing at this table. it is absolutely not limited to them. organically, they are absolutely, uh, ready to accept a new philosophy, they are ready to absolutely abstract from this world, which for them is most likely the world of colonialism. this is not the world they were aiming for, this is the one