good evening, dear friends. i don’t know how i became alive tatyana anatolyevna, i am very glad to see you. this has never happened. recorded movement ice age together again on saturday on first we have always admired you already 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank of the year in russia

good morning in the light you still look like hell, but teeth like a shark you woke me up, for the sake of this compliment or something else there is a hospital. no need to heal, like a dog that you wanted a mother, how is he okay with you? wash the response component, like a medical secret. you know, i asked you to find

the card, not look at it again, that's not right, okay. your coffee, please. thanks okay i admit it. you are doing great. it is interesting. but we will need heavy artillery of administrative resources. streletsky about the client who wants to return the child hello, i'm afraid that he will still need help with the police, but i'll check everything. all

hello again. and why do we make out a temporary nine child? wait on what basis based on the decision of the commission, then the court, which commission did not notify me, once again we are squeezing out the temporary decision after the fact, right now the child was eating. i see ate. he can't be with his father. you don't understand, he doesn't give me any medicines. he

will start healthy here again. and when it comes to removing and immediately new diseases are also on the cards, he has a lot of diagnoses, it’s very convenient to prove to the father that you are suffering with a disabled child. i don't understand, wait how e where do i go first to the medical examination, and then why do you need to visit me temporarily? they are all of you right? oh i'll bury you. i'll give you a woman, please calm down, let's do without scandals, the child will collect some things. hello hello. i'm artyom, a psychologist, remember? i have

an offer for you. come on, today you are temporarily exempt from lessons. nowhere me while to me, and there as you decide. you can't go out with strangers at all. and if to the prefix, if anything. let 's be serious, how you poke a man with a man, you can't leave the rights, but i'm not so straight stranger unfamiliar and then you will always have a phone with you. you can call your parents and your mom and dad anytime if you want. contract

it is necessary that another child approves the decoration and we will take the child. well, let's go through, i'll show you, a no thanks, we already met him, by the way, the layout is very good. yes, yes, thank you very much. where are his parents? soon i may be supported by additional lawyers. he's

legal here, right? wow, but it's better here. i, too, will be imprisoned, you will be the king of the beach there. yes keep the defense his parents will appear under no pretext, they won't let their kid in, how will they know that we are here, i told them. well, i just need them both here. and you where to me one more interesting business? read it, then come on memoirs. i'm here. goodbye. and we have a date.

on disability single well then, in general, everything is simpler. i just don't need you. maybe but getting rid of me is not going to be that easy. i really like you. and judging by the non- verbal signal on your part. i do n't care about you either. what signal do you need to give? so that you understand that it is better not to mess with people like me. i've already saved before you, so that who knows, and then the rescuers lost their nerves and didn't

leave, stumbling along the path . so don't test me or yourself. i won't pull it, you don't need to pull it. i won't dig into your diagnosis. let's just talk about yourself. i said i'm not going anywhere from here baby this place is not intended for living at all. don't touch me people, especially since the children will respond well. what will you become? well, do something not one thing, it's necessary. well, which one of us is a lawyer?

if danya then with whom is your assistant, do not worry about the conditions for the return of the child, that is, you will also blackmail us now i am not. it's enough that your wife is blackmailing you. let's go have a chat. let's go have a chat. it ’s completely incomprehensible to him for procedures in the morning. what are the conditions. give him money, so you don't even you imagine that now there will be blackmail again, so you don’t want to solve problems in court. afraid that she will save you. you don't experience being accused of physical abuse. we can easily recapture that i am not

an expert, but something was going through the edges of the scar from below wider. they definitely didn’t beat you from above and definitely not in the way you show, and you obviously came up with an idea when you demonstrated an attack very similar to a blow from below, which is more convenient to inflict on yourself. truth. to do this, you need to be a very convinced girl. we tried to blackmail husband. first a child under a disabled person, then a court in a case of physical abuse. any mother will protect her child, especially since you have an absolutely normal healthy boy. he doesn't need any procedures. what do you know what munchausen's syndrome is familiar name you stuff your child with practically harmless drugs to prove his incapacity. there are really a lot of records in his medical history, but all this can be found in equally healthy children. if you examine them with the same mania, with which you are doing it. what are you carrying? i say you heal your child and do it

on purpose to be in the role of a heroine mother who, at the cost of incredible efforts, fights for the health of her boy, i admit that they do not fully realize this. he turns a sick child, he, and since when did he become sick? you remember, you claimed that it was birth itself, but it is not so. i am ready to argue, because whatever, that the disease manifested itself when conflicts began in the family. and the further the husband dabbled, the stronger illness appeared. how old was he two years old? i doubt that it's a matter of banal treason. it's probably easy for you. she was a reliable rear

while you were building a career, but after 5 years, an already successful lawyer was married to a girl without education and special aspirations. she felt it and she just needed to somehow compensate for it. the biggest mistake is to think that a child can fix everything. of course, this is not so. and the feeling of error sometimes gives birth to monsters, this is how we are, unfortunately. but in your case it decided to go even further and become not just a mother, but the mother of the heroine, for this a feat was needed. and what could be cooler than caring for a sick child?

i'm bullying my child, but you haven't gotten to that point yet . so far, this is all without harmful vitamins and dietary supplements, but where will your manic nature lead you in this matter? i don't know anyway, you convinced the child himself that he was sick, and that's a crime. he needs support. it is you who needs the support and attraction of the child, you just need to leave it alone by reducing the amount surveys to the bare minimum. let's come to his senses, so you want to say that she just stuffed him with some kind of left pills. approximately so, yes, now it will not close. and what will you do? to begin with, i will register the child in custody will they give you this arrangement? and you'll go through

coercive therapy if you want to keep your parental rights. not with me, of course, but i will hand you over to a reliable specialist.

what happened dasha yes?

good evening on the air is a big game today vladimir putin delivered a keynote speech at the plenary session of the 19th meeting of the international discussion club. valdai, i took part in all four days of this forum and, uh, the president's speech was indeed very comprehensive and fundamental. and she. it seems to me that it very accurately reflected the current state of the world, which is characterized by both destruction and creation, the destruction of the remnants of the hegemony of the collective west, and the collapse of the attempts of the united states and its satellites to maintain their privileged position in world politics. of the world economy, in fact, to preserve the colonial system and the creation of a new world of a more just multipolar world order in his speech. vladimir putin not only

criticized the failure, but the policies of the west to strengthen its hegemony to preserve its hegemony, and proposed the principles on which , in his opinion, a new multipolar world can and should be based, such principles as diversity, as the right of every nation of every people and the state to have their own models of development, respect for the civilizational, cultural, in his speech, the president contrasted economic, political, and diversity in his speech with unification and economic value unification, which is being pushed through by the traditional west and diversity, which should become the basis of the future multipolar world order both economically and politically, and a in value terms, and we will discuss the main theses, and e of this

program speech of the russian. tape with dmitri simons, president of the center for the national interest, who recently returned from washington, and editor-in-chief of an independent newspaper konstantin rechukov dmitry konstantin vadimovich good evening. well, here, uh, it seems to me that, and most importantly, in putin's speech, he very correctly captured the current state of the moment in the development of international relations. and surprisingly, putin came to the valdai forum, as usual for the plenary session on the fourth day, but his speech was very concentrated and very accurately reflected what was discussed all four days with my participation. namely, the fact that the world is in a revolutionary moment is experiencing precisely revolutionary moment. we are witnessing the beginning of the world

revolution in the vanguard, which is russia , listen to what vladimir putin said about this, the collapse of the soviet union also destroyed the balance of geopolitical forces. the west felt like a winner and proclaimed a unipolar world order in which only its will, its culture, its interests had the right to exist. now this historical period of undivided domination. west in world affairs. the unipolar world is coming to an end. we are at a historical frontier. ahead, probably the most dangerous unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the times. e the end of world war ii. the west is not able to single-handedly manage humanity, but it is desperately trying to do it, and most of the peoples of the world no longer want to measure it. this is the main

contradiction of the new era, in the words of a classic , the situation, to a certain extent, the revolutionary top cannot, and not for they do not want to live like this. this is the formula of vladimir ilyich lenina, which, if my memory serves me, he formulated back in 913 year, characterizing that this is what the revolutionary situation consists of, was cited several times at this meeting, and the valdai club, and precisely in this, in the opinion of the overwhelming majority of participants in the altai forum, and 40 were represented there. uh, one state. most of the countries of the east and the south are in this, according to. here. eh, members. valdai is the current state of the international system. the global revolution at the top cannot mean that the united states is no longer capable of being benevolent hegemon, not even capable of consolidating and maintaining their e, hegemony is not

capable of providing the world with public goods. they don't want you, that is, the rest of humanity already. evolve on your own dmitry do you agree that this is exactly what the current conflict is, and uh, i would like to ask you to react to the similar assessment, uh, that vladimir putin gave uh, to the current state of the world. and what did you, what each of you considered the most important today's speech of president dmitry you are good, what did you choose a quote about of the president, it is very important and central and uh, a quote, very optimistic in principle, but president putin said or another thing that also seems to me central to his uh regarding his approach to the superfluous situation, that the current decade will be the next decade, most likely dangerous. after the end of the

second world war, we really live in a very turbulent era, and we see incredibly important and in many ways, encouraging historical processes. well, let's just say that the tops can and cannot live in the old way, but they are not going to give up their positions in any way and there is a very stressful period ahead of them to admit. at the beginning, when i found out that there would be a meeting of the valdai club. i only found out about this last week. i was somewhat surprised, because i thought that in the current situation, when a significant part of the altai circle participants from the collective west could not come. i thought, to what extent i will take such an analytical traditional format of the valdai club in the current conditions. and i also thought, how

president putin will only take his hippocratic oath to his hippocratic oath - this , of course, is not the doctor's oath, but the oath of the supreme commander, for whom the main duty in such a situation, the main principle should not be how to sound convincing and beautiful. and how can i say things that the supreme commander during the war should not say , you know this expression, i don’t remember who first used it. the first casualty of the war is true. it is impossible in a war to speak neutrally analytically about the course of hostilities, especially the supreme commander-in-chief and i was very afraid that this would develop, but in such a football match between the president of russia, who will talk about the course of hostilities and the participants, who will present their versions, president putin

, from my point of view, quite justifiably did not follow this path. he did not discuss what his person, but his position, especially at an open international forum, should not discuss, but he did. really. as you said, dmitry, the most important thing is why this conflict is a conflict, of course, what is happening in ukraine is shedding blood. and the issues of the world order largely depend on what happens in this conflict, but i think that if it were only ukraine, then such a conflict would not have arisen. i think i don't know if konstantin agrees with me who has a lot of interesting things about this, including in an independent newspaper. well, they would say that russia is the aggressor, well, they do not agree, we are with russian actions. there was no un security council resolution to justify this kind of action. well they said

it would have continued that the united states did all this with much greater regularity and much further from its borders, and someone in the united states did not agree, but no one declared a crusade against the united states on this issue. by the way , as you know, konstantin dmitry and russia did not do this, for example, in 2003, when there was an american operation in iraq. but now they decided to declare crusades against russia. and i think that this, of course, is not from a local conflict in the east of europe, this is the world order and basic principles. here is how putin defined from my point of view his vision of the main conflict of our time. today, the absolute majority of the world community just demands democracy in international affairs does not accept any form of authoritarian dictate of individual countries or groups of states, which is not a direct application

of the principles of democracy at the level of international relations, and what is the position of the civilized west in quotation marks? if you are democrats, then it seemed would have to welcome such a natural desire for freedom of billions of people, but no, the west calls it undermining the liberal order based on the rules. let this year economic trade wars, sanctions, boycotts, color revolutions prepare and carry out all sorts of coups. so i think that if you read this text in washington not about a conservative publicist, they would certainly say that putin is wrong, because he cannot be right, but here is the very description of the problem. i think they would have accepted, they probably said not to mix the apples

oranges, because according to anis's definition for democracy, russia is for everything good. russia for everything bad. but, in principle, these are two fundamental and mutual from my point of view. i don't know if you agree konstantin i consider a mutually exclusive idea of ​​what democracy is, because if one country one group of countries can interfere in the affairs of other countries, because we do not agree with their orders. and we even think that they behave ugly, in general. this means that the second group of countries, which should to obey this, that she is surrendering her sovereignty, and i had a clear feeling that russia, china, india, are not ready to surrender their sovereignty, and this, from my point of view, is the main

conflict of our time. you agree with this. you know, at first i was scared when you said that putin said the revolution, after all, he spoke of the revolutionary situation. i'm afraid of the revolution, but the revolutionary situation. it doesn't always turn into a revolution. and it does not change when responsible people remove those contradictions, about which you said between the tops. i don't know here it seems to me that uh several times, in the course of his speech. putin made it clear. er, well, sort of from his point of view form. how can the revolutionary situation be resolved ? e, which will be safe for people. this was the first important thought for me, the

second thought. i think she does too. maybe contain the potential for some kind of development, including those with opposing views, he said in life there is never only black or white. it seems to me also a very important approach, and finally the third one, but unfortunately. e. this is a sadder observation for me. i tried her performance. e isolate. and how does he assess the reasons that led to the conflict that began on february 24, let me remind you that from my point of view there were four groups of factors, uh, that putin considered unacceptable for russia and for him as for the president. the first expansion of nato to the east, despite our objections, the second. this is uh support for the orange revolutions, including

coup d'état, thirdly, the attitude towards the russians in the donbass whose rights, humiliating at the end fourth economic uh persecution of russian interests even behind the word sanctions, if uh describe all our economic interests, on which e, which in this case restrict nord stream 2, as e is a project to which putin personally gave e a lot of attention, because he ensured a long-term strategic relationship between russia and europe now eight months have passed and today what i hear is none of these claims or questions. and of course, in this sense for me. it is sad. you are not the reasons that welcomed the aggravation of the situation, therefore, if you do not hear about the balance of interests. uh, putin's partners , unfortunately, there will be a conflict. i have read with great interest, as i told you, your

articles in an independent newspaper, and in general, this is not just an independent newspaper, but you are a very independent and i am very glad, not only for you from russia, that such things can be said in russia. but here's one thing, and maybe, i'm wrong, maybe there's one thing that we don't fully agree with. correct me. and if it's not. i have a lot of regret about the fact that it came to a special operation. but i am not ready to absolutely say that it was a mistake. and this is partly for the reasons that today, uh , formulated a little differently, but from my point of view. in general, he clearly meant putin, but it was precisely what russia discovered that the russian leadership concluded that there was basically no way out. i don’t know if, uh, the ukrainians were going to

start, uh, an offensive in the donbass. that is, i know what to say to the ministry of defense and i take this very seriously, but personally, i don’t have such information and cannot be, but here i was in washington all this time i have, personal information in a different way, that all the demands of russia that were put forward in december 21. that they were not only ignored, but that it was done with maximum publicity with maximum in order to put russia in an uncomfortable position and when, uh, military maneuvers. do you know what? i say it became clear. why doctrine west 2020 exactly who are they in general approaching the ecological end it would seem that washington, with so much talk that they could end with a russian attack on ukraine, seemed to be glad to relax. no, there was such a, if you want

a kind of disappointment. what's here? uh russia was not ready to act and immediately began to say that ah. putin was cornered, that he retreated, what is russian? as they put it, barking, but stronger, and the russian ability, er, to strike at the same time. here it would seem. uh, the crisis began to come to an end so instead of saying that russian demands are largely unacceptable, but there is a basis for negotiations, and instead they said where russia is climbing. in general, even expressing an opinion about who can join nato, they began to actively send russia excuse ukraine for additional weapons. when the maneuvers were coming to an end, when it

would seem that this crisis should be allowed to resolve, i don’t know what the russian high command was like. but if you want, konstantin is a way out in this situation, because if the maneuvers ended in nothing and russia would simply lower these deliveries of additional weapons to ukraine and a statement about how ukraine will be nato, i can be wrong, but it seems to me that this would only lead to very strong additional pressure on russia, i do not just like that and point of view. first, we see how putin reacted to this and how to react. maybe that’s what the president said today, on what other occasion, when deciding, i myself take on the basis of what i consider necessary, that is, the point here is closed another matter, which, most likely, we and you and i talked a few months ago dmitry we are present about this when putin tries to

force the west to re-establish the world political order without a nuclear war, because, as we said, two periods before this history with humanity of international and political orders. e legal a were formed as a result of the world wars, the first world versailles peace, the second world podzamskaya yalta agreements. and now everything and what he said today shows the exhaustion of those institutions of practices and methods that were after the forty-fifth year to ensure mutual interests. that is our interests. that's what we say were not taken into account, and now it seems to me. what started in ukraine is an attempt to make the west think, is it necessary to establish such an order, not reaching a nuclear war, in which mutual

interests will be taken into account. here, i would like to return to the president's speech. e fully agrees with konstantin vadimovich, the president did not characterize, did not use the word revolution, he spoke about the revolutionary situation, but the discussions at the altai forum. still, the participants of the valdai forum insisted. still, they insisted that we were already participants in the revolution, that it had already begun, and moreover, russia was in the vanguard of this revolution and that support, and which we see in relation to russia from the countries of africa, countries of asia, southeast asia, the middle east, it is precisely based largely on the fact that they see us as the pioneer of this world revolution against neo-colonialism and limone of the traditional west and, in principle, here today. it seems to me that in general we are witnessing

a certain renaissance of marxism and neo-marxism, as the paradigm with which one should analyze not only world economic, but also world political processes, and marxism says about the antagonistic relationship between the exploiters and the exploited. and here, dmitry, i completely agree with you . eh, mr. chukov, but i 100% agree with what they said. there is also a really antagonistic contradiction, and there is no way to resolve them except for a revolution that would change the exploiters and turn them into normal participants in the international community , because the united states really even e largely agrees. what is happening revolution they call it differently they call it like russia as a revisionist power

that challenged the so-called rules- based world order, but what is the rules-based world order in their understanding, the president also said this today. let's listen to how he characterizes this concept. apparently there is only an attempt to approve one rule, so that the power now in power in power they say, i'm talking about global power. uh, had the opportunity to live without any rules at all and that's it. they were allowed. e would get away with it. what would they not do power over the world. eh, that's just what the so-called west put on the horse in their game, but the game. these are certainly dangerous . hmm bloody and i would say dirty. it denies the sovereignty of countries and peoples, their originality and uniqueness do not put in any way that the interests of other states, in any case, if it is not directly said about denial, but in practice

this is precisely what is carried out in life. uh, like no one but uh those who formulate these very rules, about which i said, have no right to original ones. uh, development everyone else should have a haircut. here , under these very rules. in this situation, dmitry overcome these contradictions in some evolutionary way without a revolution without a clash, when, on the one hand, power over the world is really at stake, and on the other hand, the survival of the country of peoples as independent independent development their right to have their own culture their own civilization own understanding of history. it cannot be overcome through conflict and just such a conflict. we are not currently watching. and i totally agree. dmitry is a very dangerous moment, because any revolution is extremely dangerous and the task before us all

really is to overcome this contradiction and form a more just world order without a world war. you're right. and konstantin is right to say that there is a difference between revolution in a revolutionary situation and very important in a revolutionary situation on the one hand contributed to the radical transformation of the world, but did not result in a nuclear war. well, here's what i want to tell you about the international reaction to putin's speech. i think that the reaction to this speech will be very different depending on who you look at and a significant part of the world. the part that is against hegemony, which will be on the side of russia they, from my point of view, will look at this wider than the conflict over ukraine they will look at it as a matter of their own sovereignty, and they will see in

russia and its leader are not just a force that wants to make a revolution, but they will see a force that stands in defense of their fundamental interests, which consist in sovereignty and in their dignity, because for many new emerging great powers, the concept of their pride and dignity is central to their perception of the world. and in this matter. they are on the side of putin, i completely agree. dmitry, this fully reflects the discussions that took place over the course of four days in the valdai club - the world majority. strangely, asia and africa see russia as a liberator ; they see russia as such a force that today undermines the colonial system of the collective west and thereby contributes to the realization of the interests of these very developing countries, while, uh, the mainstream in the traditional

west will certainly perceive the speech of vladimir putin negatively and will present it as yet another example of russian revisionism. as another example of turmoil and as another example of russia challenging the uh west. although i would not in no case did he say that this speech was anti-western, moreover, in this speech. vladimir putin made it very clear that russia not only was, but remains open to cooperation with the west. but the main thing is, with which west it is also very important, the president also said this, listen, you just need to clearly understand that there are, as i already said, before that there are two west, at least two, and maybe more, but at least two west traditional above all christian values ​​freedom of patriotism the richest culture, but now islamic

values, too, a significant part of the population of many western countries professes islam and this west is close to us in some ways, we have in many ways in common even more ancient roots, but if the other west is aggressive cosmopolitan neo-colonial, acting, as an instrument of liberal lines russia, of course, will never put up with the dictates of this west. russia does not challenge or is there the west russia simply defends its right to exist free development. at the same time, we are not going to stop as a new hegemon. russia does not propose to replace unipolarity with bipolarity with tripolarity and so on dominance. west dominance east north or south. this is inevitable, would lead to a new impasse. konstantin vladimirovich do you see the possibilities

of interaction with the first west and e. is it possible to return the first west about which the president spoke? well, on one condition that this is the conservative west that putin is talking about. he will come to power in western countries, because otherwise, putin himself stressed that we do not work with the opposition the way it works with the opposition, yes, therefore, if the presidents of the countries, the prime ministers will reflect the will of the majority of the population. uh, western countries in the aspect that putin is talking about, namely the conservative values ​​of christianity or other religions. yes, then it will be, but now, here’s how you can develop relations with the united states of america. let’s say either great britain or germany or france if those who represent a different smell, so it's uh, it's just really faster, i agree with you filed messi that not all. the west is hostile to him, this is the first,

and the second he gave us a description of the value. here putin issued a description of the value that he considers significant. that is why, in this sense, this passage was probably interesting. dmitriy well, there is a very strong conservative faction inside the united states, which in many ways upholds the same conservative values ​​that the president spoke about, these are the republicans, who are now most likely to take the majority, but in the house of representatives, and now they will hear this message that russia is open to dialogue with this conservative west, including america as a great power, but which, at the same time, does not try to reshape all the rest under its own values. yeah, in conservative circles,

putin is gaining more and more popularity. this does not mean that he approves of all his actions, especially in ukraine. but here is his general approach to world politics. naturally, it has a positive resonance among many conservatives, but dmitry in america, president putin spoke about this indirectly now. the atmosphere of total intimidation. and now, look now, a group of liberal congressmen, but wrote that yes, they support ukraine. it would be nice to avoid a world war and start negotiations with them in 2 days. it had to be taken away from the republicans the leader of the republican minority in the mccarthy house said that well, not endless, the american ability to readiness, how to uh give everything to ukraine that it asks. if there is no

real way to negotiate. i tried to speak the same. and that i got a message that the d.c. attorney is investigating me and , uh, no matter how no one spoke to me about this, they didn’t interrogate me, there was no search , and no documents were required, but requests were simply sent. to all who are connected with us in some way. well, how would the people of the organization draw the appropriate conclusions. i didn't have any personal troubles, but this kind of environment is very difficult. especially a congressman is proud to raise his head and say. here is my current position on ukraine i do not agree with the current position on democracy, because you know that the worst thing will begin in the form of congressmen, angry donors will start calling him. and of course, it is very well organized,

which dmitry once again confirms that democracy is not the power of those who call themselves democrats. this is respect for someone else's point of view. this is respect for the opinion of the majority. and that is majority rule. we'll break into a big commercial and continue in a few moments. robe of the crown presented to her by archbishop ambrosius the empress laid it on herself so elizabeth emphasized her legal right to the throne of the russian empire her father peter i died without leaving a will elizabeth's position at court was very precarious, she had to either take power into her own hands and wait for the execution, the guards literally brought elizabeth into the winter palace on your shoulders. reign, which began as a series of

festivities and balls, became the beginning of the russian enlightenment, elizabeth's thief, one of the most brilliant in europe, became a symbol of not only power, but also cultural growth of the empire elizaveta petrovna premiere november 4 at the first, elizaveta still dreamed of love and happiness the former deed of the village herd olezhka rose pink became the second person in the empire free vtb debit card with a cashback of 2 percent in popular categories plus 1000 rubles after the first purchase. order on vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. goods

behave profitably. appreciate the low prices of the drink coffee coffee for 119.90 hands of the back, again again, the hands are back sale, 11 11 on ozone only from november 11 suit homemade for 199 rubles. hand mixer for 299 rubles. children's designer for 149 rubles. this is a credit card from a russian bank. shoot. transfer 120

days without interest for the first time for everything in the bank - this is not a problem. i spent it instantly, the washing machine broke , the microcircuit burned out. rusbank, this is not a problem, no interest. no problem 120 for everything. rosbank real opportunities even with daily use of dandruff shampoo, you can return again without yelling. not just washing off dandruff, but the fungus acts on the cause of its appearance. opt for a no yelling treatment helps reduce flaking and itching fights the cause of dandruff. yeah call me back anyway calls are free so you won't believe me, i'm going on a date today. i marry bank customers. tinkoff no longer pay tinkoff.ru and get free minutes forever. tinko. he

is the only one where it is between the sky. absolutely naked, where sorrow ends, good afternoon vera in salted caramel and a pinch of cinnamon, please, always great deals on hello world.ru for petrol. i will cry. no cashback, then i remember coffee from me, most likely the world is habitually cashless on the citylink website or application thousands of different products at competitive prices huawei matebook laptop with a discount of 5.000 rubles. buy in the cityling you a high chance of winning or a lot of serious prizes. still, if you want to win millions, then buy a ticket from partners.ru, the national lottery, i’m talking about an all-terrain vehicle card. intelligibly pay everywhere here everywhere and get an income of 10% in any

grocery with an all-terrain vehicle card. bank is cheaper buy more than five fruity baby purees and get a 15% discount. now many are putting life on pause due to rising prices with credit from sovcombank make important purchases at today's prices and turn back on all your plans sovcombank people are more important ambitious girls challenge the unique alexander cowardly hot ice of the russian grand prix i wonder what will happen next?

on the air is a big game, we continue to discuss with dmitry sainz and konstantin rynchukov today's keynote speech by president putin at the valdai international discussion club , in which he gave an assessment of the world disorder that the collective west, led by the united states, was trying to build and outlined the contours of that just multipolar world order, both in the field of politics and in the field of economics, which is now creating russia together with the world majority and much of the president's speech was devoted to the world economic order. and in particular, how vladimir putin characterized the world order that tried to consolidate the traditional scent. please . it was on the unification of financial and technological monopoly that the spreading of all and

all sorts of differences was built and the western model of globalization is not about colonial in its essence. the task was understandable to strengthen the unconditional dominance of the west in the world economy and politics. and to do this, put at the service of natural and financial resources, intellectual personnel and economic opportunities of the entire planet to do this under the sauce of the so-called new global interdependence, if the west sells medicines or seeds of food crops to other countries, then they are ordered to kill the national pharmaceutical lepsy. well, in fact, because in practice it all boils down to this. machine tools are destroying local mechanical engineering, you know, it’s worth it, but i’m still being prime minister. i understood it, it's only worth opening the m-m market. for a specific for a specific

product group, all local manufacturers have laid down and it is almost impossible to raise their heads to build so the attitude in this way is the capture of markets and the resources of the country are deprived of their technological scientific potential. this is not progress, but enslavement reducing economies to a primitive level, technological development should not increase global inequality, but reduce it, this is how russia traditionally implements its foreign and technological policy vladimir vladimirovich do you agree that there is a model that the west offers the rest of the world in the economic plan. she's really kinda like the president said, you know eat me. uh, special relationship to the term non -deviationism, because it came up. e, in the late fifties to the sixties characterized the relationship. uh, developing climbing countries at that time.

many developing countries have declared their independence, the collapse of the colonial system and relations with the west. and now the west took only those resources that they needed and actually kept, as they said, the monocultural nature of the economy. e countries of the third world they were called the countries of asia africa latin america or the countries of the third world in quotation marks. what happened next? uh, here it is very important to understand, uh, what can the term not deviantism, which, in fact, can be true, yes , really describe what has happened in the world since then in the model when independent, uh, young states began to develop their economies there was a need for industrialization. the soviet union helped many people build dams, metallurgical plants were the main source of development, and the development came from above, state investments, state assistance from and. uh, industrialization very soon in 10-15 years. it turned out to be a very effective model in the

third world. that's what it's called. it turned out that public investment is, uh, being spent unwisely on the debts of public corporations that were created exorbitantly. all budget money goes to pay these debts, and there was a crisis in this model. and somewhere at the turn of the nineties, the proportions changed in order to develop 90% of the resources had to be private and only 10% state. and where to get private traders, what does a private trader want is a transnational a corporation is a foreign company. they say okay. i will come to your african or asian country to develop, but on one condition that there will be such and such rules in the competition market, such and such rules for export, import, such and such rules for the protection of property, and so on. and at that moment it turned out that countries began to clarify what is needed for development and it turned out that transnational corporations contain in a

concentrated form what they needed was technology capital, know-how, managerial, personnel and market access practices. and, of course, now for today. between 80 and 80% of all so-called technology exchange between the third world and developed countries takes place in the form of cooperation with tncs and how to stop this. by the way, three-quarters of industrial trade also passes through intra -transit e-channels. that is, as if one workshop in one direction sends its products to the other now to say that this is not a colonial system and let's develop ourselves. i don't see the opportunity because i don't see it state capital, which could solve the problems that each of these countries faces. therefore, in this case, the formulation of the question is understandable? how to implement it and even here