but it didn’t work out to kill yourself, and you decided. just disappear. to remake themselves, replace them with new ones . they hoped that grief would remain that irina from the past. but the reality is that the new irina decided to connect her life with driving. unconsciously hoping to be better than before. to be someone who will never put people's lives in danger. and this is your way of making up for the guilt. of course you are to blame, but it's not something you can change. you tried to hide from grief behind new personalities but in a new or old guise. you can change your present to your future, but the past. you must simply accept. with my fault

and the fault of that freak. are you still trying to punish him? you see, in every drunken passenger, not in every one they wanted ira behind the wheel. you have changed outwardly, mastered a new profession, but the fact is that you are still trying to regain your old life. you just wanted to have unprotected sex with a person who doesn't mean anything to you, you want to get pregnant, you think a new child will save you from suffering. now do, honestly there are two long years of two or three therapy in the following stages and a short few months. what is it like

to start a relationship? let a person into your life who will help you feel in the present. it will remind you what it is like to live today and enjoy the one who is near. that is, we, as it were, with you, probably, there were ways, yes? well, yes, but without the topic of potential motherhood or fatherhood. i didn't pull it. why here, in fact, it is better to enter without your own cockroaches in your head. nowhere for me now on the site dating. not sure if it will work, but worth a try. you need a caring groom, and he needs a

leading female role. this is me to myself. don't think too much about it yet. hello hello dan this is irina irina this is dan very nice. irina street racer owner of beautiful tattoos dan just such garbage was a friend with her daughter, there is no mother. well hang out, i

'll go let's go. will you let me in? i am mature

and free. this is stupid. after all, he came back to teach. what is good? what is you nekoladochny gather. fucked up, right? come to your senses, whats up kirusha? so afraid of harming the child. why did you do it? i know my father, this is a very big

mistake.

good evening on the air big game today vladimir putin made another attempt to achieve such a

settlement of the nagorno-karabakh and armenian-azerbaijani conflict as a whole, which would ensure both long-term peace and security of the armenian population of nagorno-karabakh and at the same time would not turn armenia into another pawn of the american geopolitical games with disastrous consequences for her own security of ethnic armenians in nagorno-karabakh and the entire region in sochi, first bilateral meetings of vladimir putin with armenian prime minister nikol, pashinyan and azerbaijani president ilham aliyev took place today, and then their negotiations in a trilateral format, another important event of today was the meeting of the un security council was carried out at the initiative of russia in connection with the saturday terrorist attack of the kiev regime against the ships of the russian black sea fleet in sevastopol and the indefinite suspension of russia's participation in the grain deal in response to this terrorist attack, and here is the statement made today at the security council by

russia's permanent representative to the f world organization vasily nebenzya, listen this subversive action of kiev grossly violates the istanbul agreements of july 22 of the whole year and, in fact, puts the godmother of humanitarian animals. it is now obvious to everyone that for the ukrainian side the black sea humanitarian corridor is being used for military sabotage purposes. in connection with these actions of kiev, the russian side cannot guarantee the safety of civilian ships participating in the black sea initiative. we do not know what other terrorist attacks are being prepared, kiev with the support of its western sponsors. therefore, we are forced to suspend the implementation of this initiative from october 29 for a certain period of time, and the decisions and measures taken without our participation do not oblige us to anything. at the same

time, given the existing facts of abuse of the humanitarian corridor and, in general, the fact that the black sea remains a war zone. we cannot allow the passage of ships without our inspection, and we will be forced to accept independently control measures missed by the joint coordination center without our approval, bitch cargo. well, already tonight , the russian ministry of defense made an official statement that russia is suspending traffic along the black sea security corridor until the situation around the saturday terrorist attack is clarified. russia and what's out of the question object. on this route, until kiev accepts additional obligations not to use it for military purposes, while the united nations believes that the

suspension of the grain agreement announced by russia will not affect the export of ukrainian grain, the coordinator of the world emergency organization. martin griffix said at the same today's meeting of the security council that the grain initiative and the corresponding obligations remain in force, even during the suspension of participation in the days of russia and we will discuss this difficult situation, as well as the prospects for russian western relations and the policy of the united states with the president of the center for national interests dmitry syme and the former head of the russian institute for strategic studies, as a lieutenant general. e leonid reshetnikov dmitry leonid petrovich e. good evening. good evening dmitry well, as you can see, the situation is really alarming russia believes that the movement of ships is unacceptable russia apparently, this follows from what the ministry of defense published and what vasily said there would be no gasoline

stop and independently inspect, possibly by force, and those ships that will go, if they go, and therefore the corridor, and at the same time it is naturally in the west. uh, apparently , they believe that nothing, no matter how happened, and without the participation of russia, this deal will simply continue. eh, mine. the fun is, don't you see some very serious escalation risks here. what will be the reaction of the west to what happened, i see very serious risks, but let's start with the fact that there are completely different assessments of the situation. here let's let's hear what president shajabaiden has to say. president how do you feel about the fact that russia is becoming grain? the agreement is outrageous and will lead to increased hunger. they have no reason to act in this way, but they are always looking for some kind of justification, that their

unacceptable actions provoked the west into what they are doing. there is no merit. he negotiated the deal. and that should be the end of it. here, i ask you to turn colleagues to one expression of the american president that there is no reason for russia, this is not just being said. e that there are some agreements obligations. ah, hungry people, they need to go forward. but it is said more clearly that russia has no reason. this is the same expression that was used when talking about the so -called russian aggression in ukraine, it was never enough to say russian aggression. it would seem only a serious accusation, but no, it was always necessary to ritually add an unprovoked one, and the whole idea is there that russia's action is not just wrongful. well im

there is simply no rational explanation. and since there is no rational explanation for them that they can be ignored, that is, in other words, the arguments of russia, the facts given to russia in this case are already ignored a priori, that is, they will not respond to russian arguments, but to russian actions and russia's capabilities i will add the determination of russia to do something about this, which will prevent the transportation of this grain on the basis of an agreement simply between turkey, and it’s a little interesting that in this case he acts like a well a negotiating partner, and there is definitely no corresponding decision of the security council of russia, at least it would not allow this, and he is

also joining, but if you want to join the opponents of russia, or probably, it would be more correct to say bureaucracy. he begins to play that independent role, which this bureaucracy is tired of. it's not intended, so i think it will all depend on that. what will russia be able to do using its armed forces and to what extent will it be possible to do this, but without an unacceptable escalation, and here i want to say one thing. at uh, the media emphasize that russia will stop. uh, these ships, bulk carriers and so on. and it is being discussed, especially the lithuanian minister of foreign affairs. alan sberges. but how nato ships should enter the black sea to

confront russia, in fact, russia can learn something. uh, ukraine, for example, has drones, for example, there are rockets that arrived from somewhere, for example, there are mines. i mean, it's not like i'm recommending that russia do something like that . i just wanna say what if behave like behave smell, it turns out that a lot can be done without uh direct consultation. uh, i think the general will confirm that russia even has submarines, which can only do something and send some signals. here i would like to know your opinion. you know, here's the deal itself. she represented for the forces that are waging against us , uh, hostilities a real multi-level war, a hybrid multi-level. yes temptation uh, was the question

how? uh, how long will our ill-wishers endure this temptation, overcome it or not, and they could not avoid this temptation and went to use it. uh, these are the deals of this corridor for concrete actions against russia, the most concrete actions, so hmm next steps. if, as mr. sainz said, if we don't show it. reasonable determination spent reasonable determination is the next step. i really like this expression reasonable practiced modes. yes, everything should be verified. well, clearly and clearly, these caravans will already be half without grain and just go and supply weapons and the necessary materials of ukraine here. that's the question rests on

this, in principle. we remember the president several times saying that this agreement is being used poorly, he already warned. and this is what happened, you could see. uh, intelligence reports of intelligence information that is being prepared to use this deal for the purpose of drawing. uh, a strike in order to inflict some kind of provocation. now this temptation of the special services has taken place. uh, i apologize to america and and the uk, i just forgive this, yes, thank you, we could not stand this temptation. and now, of course, we must work out clearly and clearly our reaction, which was stated by the minister of the ministry of defense. uh, i don't think there will be, uh, big uh, escalation tragedy if we stop a couple of ships and check them out. so what? well, uh, i agree with

what the general said, but you had a little question, and in the age of russia, not only the military. so let's assume that russia will not stop here, but simply russian warships will appear there. let's assume that it doesn't come across intelligibly. i know a little about how international insurers work. you can imagine what insurance rates will be, if any. available when russian warships appear there, and especially if one of these dry cargo ships runs into a mine. and we must keep in mind that these are dry cargo ships. they do not belong to western governments. they are owned by private companies, if private companies are willing to take such a risk, they will certainly raise their stakes. now

russia has already said that when it comes to really poor countries, russia is ready for them donate i emphasize donate not to sell, but to donate correctly. yes, gratuitous transmissions gratuitously gratuitously, and 500,000 there, yes. this means that it is not the poorest countries that will have to pay these new rates, but countries will have to pay. of the west, of course, and i don’t want to gloat about this, because first of all, of course, average normal people will pay, but this will be a situation where the west fought for something and ran into it, but will say, of course, moscow is to blame dmitry i totally agree with you, agrees for me, in principle, uh, well, not even surprisingly, i am outrageous, but in a good sense of the word, was the reaction of u western elites to russia's decision to suspend its participation in the

grain deal, because again an appeal to the problems of hunger in developing countries . here is british foreign secretary james cleverley. e, said that russia should allow exports, that is, grains to reach the starving world. yes, but i'm sorry. this is not allowed by the west. uh, neither ukrainian nor russian grain should go, just in africa and asia the statement was made by german foreign minister anna lena berg millions of people around the world are starving, and russia once again threatens the security of grain supplies. this must stop. we call on russia to return to its promises to the international community. well, and this despite the fact that the vast majority of ukrainian grain in the framework of this grain deal went specifically to europe, and uh, uh, the second most important component of this grain deal regarding the removal of indirect restrictions on the export of russian agricultural fertilizer products was not completed

was, so take it. i fully agree with you. russia declares that it is ready to donate, and to transfer half a million tons of agricultural products to african countries, dmitry patrushev and the minister of agriculture announced this. for russia, here is an interesting reaction of the united states to this, by the way, deputy permanent representative of the united states to him. e jeffrey delorentis said that washington would welcome this willingness. from russia to transfer these 500,000 tons to developing countries, but believes that this does not justify blocking exports from ukraine, that is, in the elderberry garden in kiev, uncle dmitry, i don’t want to be the representative of the united states in this studio. uh, this is not for an unnatural role for me. nobody authorized me to play, but still i would say, here is what the american representative said, as they say, you can disagree with it. yes, it's normal language. and here we are dealing with people who

generally say absolutely, including the president of the united states, who generally say that there is no no problem. russia invented all this , they admit that there was an attack on the black sea fleet , they admit that it was an unprecedented, wide attack. they admit that kiev organized this without consulting the united states, there was a drain on this from the white house and that american equipment american drones did not take part in this, that is, washington understood that something serious was happening that could have consequences, but in kiev, they believe that remember how saakishvili believed in his time, uh 2008, that he can get away with it, that if he succeeds, there are no winners. well, apparently, as the ministry of defense says, it could not have done

without the help of e british patrons, who go further than who he is in undermining kiev . this is a very disturbing moment. dmitry, on the one hand, is very positive and encouraging that , as you said in washington, you did not directly participate in the planning of this terrorist attack, although it is difficult to believe in moscow, because during the implementation of this terrorist attack in the sky over the black sea was circling the american drone global hock, the american drone that took off from the american military base in sicily flew in. e into the zone, so to speak, e of this terrorist attack at exactly the right time and flew away after these drones that were handed over. uh, the western patrons, so to speak, carried out their attack on the kiev regime, so yes, first of all, the drones are very skillfully complimenting you on this issue. and, of course, this episode, to put it mildly

, leads to reflection. of course, having said about this. this reconnaissance drone hangs in the crimean region on a regular basis. can i say it was a coincidence? no, i don't know, but i can't rule it out. well, dmitry. you see, in moscow, there is no final clarity. yes, there were leaks from the white house, on the other hand, there were facts confirmed by everyone that this drone was circling. and if that drone was circling there on purpose, then that means the biden administration has violated its own red book. let me propose to you before the general says the viennese word. uh, what are called compromises between us? let me tell you that our forum doesn't really matter, because let's assume that i'm right. it means that the united states is not the main patron of ukraine, and this is what henry kisenfer said when the soviet

union in the mid-seventies, when the soviet union was reproached for assisting palestinian terrorists, and i am speaking in moscow. no, you didn’t have anything to do with this, kissinger didn’t argue with them over trifles, he said when you start. and vovanch you can’t complain that the specific stone that hit was not thrown by you into the united states bear moral political responsibility for the kiev regime, the fact, but there is one more lord, one moment, really. maybe politicians in washington and high-level very high-level did not know anything, but there are covert operations secret agreements of the nato intelligence agencies. english american they can act quite autonomously as there is an agreement. there is a secret secret treaty agreement and possible participation of american intelligence services

in this action. we shouldn't forget about politics, we might not know just one person knows doesn't know if the president or who is now, uh, really leads the president of the united states because he is in such a state that there are doubts, in fact , he completely understands that happens in any case, we should know about it that the cia and uh mi6, and all other special services have cooperation agreements for joint work, therefore it is quite possible that at this level this participation was i, for one, believe that it was. and even more so, dmitry e, the baiden administration has said many times in no uncertain terms that they forbid kiev to carry out military strikes on the crimea and on

a strategic object in crimea united adams and others. and others can, yes, but also by the way, it is under e, and for this reason , according to the biden administration, they do not transfer long-range missiles to the kiev regime, which you could just shoot it. e to the crimea , but now, again, with the participation of an american drone. and a blow was struck. yes, most of it was intercepted, of course, yes, but a blow was also struck from the russian point of view. this is a very important and dangerous step towards escalation. in addition, dmitry, we often drew an analogy between the current situation and the caribbean crisis. look now. with him and the west pretends as if nothing has changed. and what, russia simply withdrew from the grain deal. she's like the ships continue to operate, they must go, i

agree with you that, in the case of commercial ships, it is unlikely that there will be political will and expediency to carry out the passage of these ships, especially russia unambiguously. he says that security cannot be implemented, but on the other hand, let's imagine a hypothetical situation, if the ships are moving, russia says that the passage of these ships is unacceptable, that russia will independently, and uh control, uh, these ships, stop them accordingly. really. here's another analogy with the caribbean crisis. only here are civilian ships, and russia is carrying out an actual blockade, and there were warships of the soviet union and the united states carried out not an actual, but uh, quite a full-scale naval blockade, but you must admit that the analogy is very close. well, here's what prominent american experts say again. what is russia complaining about? here, let's hear what the

former american ambassador to ukraine said, who also held major positions in the state department in peiffer. the ministry of defense of russia called the use of uavs and marine drones by ukraine to attack the ships of the russian black sea fleet in sevastopol a terrorist act. stop crying russia is at war with ukraine, so strikes on russian ships are absolutely legal. so i know, like for many years and i really respect him and what he said from an american point of view has a highlighted meaning, but i would like to say to steve what then to the united states? no need to cry if in response the ministry of defense in moscow will not cry, but mr. peiffer will say instead. thank you for

explaining our responsibilities and if the black sea fleet is a legal target for ukraine even when this target includes merchant ships that were there , then explain why the legal solution is not command points in kiev why the target is not e command political points in london why the pentagon is not such a point? you understand this is not about what is legal, i do not know the general, whether you will agree with me in such cases, you first of all ask another question. and what can this lead to? and here is the logic that you can hit any target? uh, as in the crimea in this case, in a place that is under the control of russia, by the way, sevastopol was only until 2014. i want to remember it. they say that

this is everything that did not belong to russia until 2014. this is a legal decision of sevastopol and the black sea fleet. they belonged to russia under international agreements, including with ukraine and until 2.000 of the fourteenth year until 2044 in accordance with russians forgot about it, so they use it very prices, of course, comments, and then all the same, uh, this is your uh, colleague and yes, steve puff, he also juggles the heart of russia's defense a little for me, he says blow. uh, a terrorist attack on the black sea fleet, because a grain deal was used, of course, a terrorist attack. you used. this is not, uh, just a military operation, yes, you used the opposing sides, uh, deal on grain and inflicted. it 's there that's the problem. eh, we need to talk about this, and not just that here we are, yes, that we are offended, that

we were attacked, yes, well, there really are hostilities. no we say you attacked using absolutely, unrelated to the war to military action. e this deal here on this, it seems to me, well, it is very valuable here, er, what mr. saim. i noticed that sevastopol, uh, our base there is our entire black sea fleet. it should stand until 2044. it belonged to russia and does not mean the city itself, but the war naval base. and it has nothing to do. uh, to those statements that americans make american colleagues. and dmitri here i am surprised, to be honest, this statement by steve pifer, because i also know him well, i personally met him many times when he worked at the brookins institute. after he was the united states ambassador in kiev, i know steve piper as a specialist in strategic stability and arms control

in strategic stability theory. there is such a thing as escalation control. that's what pifer says, that you can hit the black sea fleet, anywhere. he denies it according to escalation control. yes, there are certain lines, and during the conflict. we are in case of need. let's move on to the next one. escalation, but only if it is impossible to end the conflict without going to this stage of escalation perfectly, realizing that this transition of turtles is fraught with very dangerous consequences. yes and that's what it offers. piper is almost immediately jumping to one of the highest levels of escalation, after which there is already a direct military clash of a nuclear war, therefore, in my opinion sight. this is just unprofessional vision. you know why i'm so obsessed with the stylish not because he said, er, some impossible thing, but because he is one of the best and this is the problem in many ways of dialogue with the united

states, that people professionalism, if want the professional integrity that we have taken for granted in the past. in general, they speak as if it were sound logic. common sense in general, the united states should be expelled from relations between russia. and this is not even mutual distrust. and this is, in general, a feeling that to reckon with each other , including reckoning with each other's possible very powerful answers, that you can afford not to do this. this is what distinguishes us today from the caribbean crisis and distinguishes us in a very dangerous way, dmitry completely agrees. and now we will break for a short advertisement and in a few moments we will just talk about the possibility of them and the prospects for dialogue between russia and the united states. empress elizabeth petrovna was

we owe her a passionate builder for the appearance of such pearls in russian architecture as the winter palace, peterhof, the smolny fence, and many other shuvalov so captivated the empress with the idea of ​​the university that she discussed the charter of the new educational institution with him for a long time and in detail and gave separate advice. empire elizaveta petrovna premiered on november 4 at the first empress elizabeth came up with an unprecedented kind of holiday masquerade metamorphoses. free vtb debit card with 2% cashback in popular plus categories 1.000 rub. after the first purchase. order on

vtb.ru. switch to vtb and that's it, you will get to travel around russia because euphoria was the most amazing world in this sector, it attracted tourists with extraterrestrial landscapes, and archaeologists with the ruins of mod civilizations. suddenly, euphoria showed us her true

colors. the storm has opened. i have one more secret. do you know how much longer we will be presenting the new line book service from mts read books. listen to podcasts and audiobooks in a handy bestsellers app. there will be nothing further. why do i have will there be a romance novel and a detective story? what about you yet? lines where one good book is followed by another. even where the cold reigns, there is one who is stronger. you understood an international brand with many years of expertise in the development of engine oils for harsh climates where quality standards are paramount. you were an oil hardened by cold. buy at gas stations and boyle new national lottery

you have a high chance of winning or a lot. you still want to win millions of serious prizes, then buy a ticket from partners and nloto.ru national lottery where it is between the sky and the sea. absolutely naked, where the mountains end in salted caramel and a pinch of korean, please. always great deals on hello world.ru for gasoline cashback, then i have coffee, i remember, rather the world. usually non-cash, cyan will make sure that you do not overpay when renting or buying, because we mark apartments with a favorable price, write to the owner or call. how to select tele2 presents the content of subscriptions. this is the illusion of a proposal. it does not take into account individual preference. good

welcome to the real world. we at tele2 allow you to collect a subscription yourself, this unique offer, pay only for the selected content and this analogues. and also a subscription mix. can not even purchase our only selected services in a subscription mix. imagine for 30 million a dream apartment in a spacious hallway, where there is a wardrobe in the ceiling of the living room. it’s convenient to cook your own corner, it’s nice to prepare, buy a ticket everything can come true on the birthday of the housing lottery, we are guaranteed to raffle off an apartment for 30 million. open the door to your dream hot ice guarantor with russian live broadcasts on november 5 and 6 on the first you have always admired you. you already have 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank photo in russia there

is a big game on the air, a-a drone attacks on ships in sevastopol, ships of the black sea fleet and civilian ships. this is definitely another step up the ladder of escalation between russia and nato and that we have come to a very dangerous point, and that now the situation is the most dangerous for all the time since the first russian special operation in ukraine for all the time of the hybrid war. the west is talking about this against russia in the west too. here is nato secretary general ian stonetenberg. this weekend , he said that right now the largest escalation of the ukrainian conflict. for all the time since february 24, the largest escalation in terms of a combination of factors. in that. i tend to agree with him. in which i am not inclined to agree with him. this is that instead of an urgent transition to a policy of diplomatic regulation, stoltenberg declares the need to

strengthen support for ukraine and, rather, the inadmissibility russia's victory in that. the statement itself, despite being the biggest escalation. uh, for all the time, conflicts and indeed the united states has allocated another package of military assistance to ukraine for 275 million dollars, and the second us aircraft carrier group led by the aircraft carrier gerald is already heading to europe yes, an aircraft carrier group led by the aircraft carrier george bush is already in europe and croatia will have gerald ford off the coast of great britain. russia, for its part, at all levels, is talking about the readiness to move to politico-diplomatic regulation, both with the united states and with ukraine, vladimir putin stated this while speaking at the valdai forum last week, then sergey lavrov and dmitry peskov also stated the same thing. well, the united states, how did they respond to these unambiguous

signals on the part of russia about the readiness for the policy of diplomatic regulation, and this was stated by the secretary of state, damn it. ah, who on friday made a statement that the united states does not seek contacts with russia because they do not will, according to glinkin, be meaningful. so , after all the statements of putin in valdai and lavrov after that, dmitry, here is a similar position of the united states - is it, let's say, but the matter is in the midterm elections, which have already begun with the united states, or is it still a fundamental position that it is necessary to weaken russia to such a level that it could no longer be considered a great power. well, there is probably an element of both, eh, but we mentioned mid-term elections at the beginning, which, by the way, will take place. uh, today is monday. they stand by the mid-term elections on the eighth day, that is, one day of the week. well, the pre-vote has already begun, the pre-vote has already begun

. and, in these conditions, of course, you really don’t want a biden. on the one hand, he looks like a weakling, and on the other hand, dangerous to adventurers and until recently . it was obvious that the main pressure on the biden on the democrats was to prevent the president from looking like a weakling. well, lately more and more voices have begun to be heard, moreover, in the republican democratic party that, as it were, we love ukraine. well, not to such a degree as to render her blindly under the hole, even where there is an opportunity, a terrible catastrophic escalation. it starts to speak more and more openly those who say it, they are immediately subjected to harassment, but the more, uh, harassment, the more it attracts attention and

some kind of critical mass in that other party is already starting to appear that make these voices . i don't want to say legitimate, but socially acceptable these people can still be bullied, but it becomes harder to bully them. and uh, there was such a leak, too, obviously from the white house, what is president byte? well, in general, i’m also dissatisfied with zelensky’s impudence, that when zelensky put too much pressure on him in their telephone conversation back in the summer, the biden even raised his voice at him. and i was told by employees of the administration, i can’t even say where i promised not to say this, but quite responsible employees of the administration, not members of the cabinet. eh, in general people of serious responsibility. and what exactly ukrainian diplomats allow themselves to call and intimidate them not by physical violence,

of course, but by the fact that they will complain about them to congress and, as it were, ruin their lives and may even lead to their leaving washington, they begin to get tired of the zelensky company. i don't want to exaggerate it. um, bye bye, ukraine still has a very strong backing of political subversion in the united states, but it's not becoming. that's how she was untouchable this period, it seems to me, begins to pass and so, i think after the midterms. uh, no one in congress will propose, what is called completely part with beloved ukraine, but they will start watching. how much ukraine gets how ukraine spends money and i'm not afraid to say in what tone ukraine allows itself to talk with its american patrons. this is the lofa that

the ukrainians have created for themselves in washington i think it will come to an end dmitry i completely agree with you and note that but the criticism of the current policy of the baytan administration is bipartisan character and left wing. democratic party and remember last week, the effect of a bombshell was made by e, information about the publication of an open letter to baidun by thirty e, progressive democrats. yes, they called him back under political pressure, but the very fact that biden's fellow party members opposed baidan's policies and there are many critics in the republican party. the current uh politics. uh, issuing permanent checks, and the kiev regime without any control without uh, accounting, then not a simple situation that exists within the united states, and one of these voices is the republican polzar, who, even fearing

an escalation and seeing the current policy of the biden administration , invited vladimir putin and vladimir zelensky to talks in arizona in his home state. listen, if in our politics or in our there is not a single leader in the armed forces who will try to end this war without unimaginable global death and destruction. then i owe this letter of mine to vladimir putin and volodymyr zelensky, with an invitation to phoenix, arizona to participate in peace talks, the world political and military leadership refuses even attempts to de-escalate the conflict between russia and ukraine, instead of participating in peace talks of warmongers, neoconservatives and the biden regime. it seems that they are obsessed with the idea of ​​bringing a potential and nuclear world war to all of humanity. leonid petrovich here. note the term warmonger is also used by left-wing democrats, such as tools and uh, the republican staff didn't quite

start it as a left-wing democracy. and now she has become, how to say independent independence supporter of the republicans, yes, but uh, it means that the authors of this letter of the thirty, they were also left-wing democrats. yes, but leonid petrovich, do you agree that after the midterm elections it will be really more difficult for the biden administration, at least more difficult to carry out, and the policy that they are pursuing now and that, well, the balance of power within the united states will change in favor of political and diplomatic settlement. yes , of course, these are the factors that you are talking about, uh, we can expect that the policy towards ukraine of the conflict will be more rational. eh, deprived. these are the emotions that, uh, dmitry spoke. uh, when a full hug and uh, not all

support and so on, but, but colleagues of e, we still need to understand that in the united states of america those who make policy believe that the moment has not yet come for uh, some diplomatic real some kind of democratic efforts. they will this moment, when it comes, they will start with this effort, but for now they see that the situation allows them to continue to strike at russia in its goal. as you said, the weakening to the very, very, possibly low level after the elections. i also think that the moment is not yet us, as soon as ukraine starts. uh, to collapse already, as a regime, as a country, as it goes, uh hmm, it will go into a state of already half-ability to resist. that's when the american leadership can even

become, uh, big initiators. e negotiations. e. how can anyone else come up with such an initiative? well, uh, one very interesting thing is that there are circles that want to crush russia , push russia to the lowest level, for some of them the lowest level. let's hear what a low level they would like to apply to russia because they said that congressman jemiraskin. this week, congressman jamie ruskin said russia is an orthodox country with traditional values. and for this reason. it must be destroyed, no matter the price we pay. that is this is no longer a conventional war. she is a real jihad. jenny ruskin said it out loud, and many in both political parties agree with him. they would like to immediately start a new world war.

so what this jihad will mean for you and me i, unfortunately, i don't know. personally, i know very well about his reign until a year and a half ago, when i moved to that virginia. it was mine. raised that way. well, jamie is a democrat, so dmitry could have brought him up, of course he didn’t vote, but i just he mean, it's really crazy and ferocious people. they decided that this is the place where i lived normal political patronage, because they said that if there were too many police there, it would be racial discrimination, because the best police would be used somewhere else. they began to actively destroy local schools, imposing some norms that were absolutely unacceptable for parents, including, uh,

necessarily the so-called trans-gender education, and did not require that schools with high school, and ten-year-olds were taught the so -called critical racial theory, which boils down to the fact that there are once white oppressors. and there are times and victims and heroes in the struggle against the oppression of oppression - this is natural, black and other minorities. this is an absolutely polarizing and generally human-hateful approach. and that's what i was sorry for this degree of ferocity with which it was presented when talking about parents who now did not agree to transgender education. they didn't say that these people are just wrong. no, they said that they are racists, that they are scoundrels, and if they start speaking, let's say at some meetings, but about their educational district. then the

police intervene. and their general began to christen, parents began to be arrested for protesting against the transgender education of their children. why am i telling you this, that these are special people, these are jacobin bolshevik people, but you understand, this is not someone who does not believe. it is their ignoble rage that frightens many of people. this is their spirit, this is their spirit. yes it is eh which scares many people inside america and that's the object of this spirit. this rage has become today russia has really polarized in the united states the strengthening of these polar extreme radical ideas, including primarily on the left flank in the united states a small

problem, because these people profess absolute total intolerance towards everyone who does not share their views fiercely total impatience, both inside the united states and outside the united states, and therefore for them, of course same, russia - it is on the same level of evil along with the republican party. and, of course. eh, donald trump, how are you? a popular leader to this day, uh, among the republicans, but i'm also worried that there are, of course, moderate people in the united states , those who belong to what is called the deep state, and the intelligence community is the traditional political elites centrists. the same baitan administration. and now they believe that russia really needs to be weakened. i am i recall a recent article by david ignoring. and

the famous columnist that he is posting there that one of the most important goals for the united states of this military conflict is to deprive russia of what ignashas calls imperial ambitions, that is, a fundamental change in russian identity and the transformation of russia into normal. as egneishis says, he writes to a normal national state without imperial ambitions, without pretensions to prevailing influence in the post-soviet space, without pretensions to some kind of peculiarity in relation to russia and ukraine that is, this is a total reformatting of russia, and now i'm worried that this is the obsession with the need for this reformatting of russia is really deeply embedded in the consciousness of the american political elite. and that they are unlikely to rest until either they have achieved this goal. or they simply realize the

impossibility of it. zhenya dmitry but uh, as we realize the impossibility of achieving this goal, we can still go quite far along the path of uh, escalation risks, but dmitry i'm afraid that they can get completely worse before it gets better and in america they say a lot that the russian point of view is where, escalation through escalation? it doesn't seem to me that this is how you know the general, it's better than me. it seems to me that this is such a popular point of view in russian military organizations. and at least. i don't see russia in practical terms with this approach. today i am guided, but speaking objectively speaking objectively . not starting we must recognize a very important reality. no, there is no war in ukraine the war over ukraine and in the war over ukraine the

territory of ukraine is fought predominantly, although not exclusively by ukrainian units. well , of course, the war is between more and more between russia and the collective west. and in russia , in recent times, criticism has often been made about how russian military operations were conducted. i will be careful in my assessments. i'm not a military expert well, that's what i want to tell you friends, when i see the entire collective west supports ukraine and when i watched every time russia manage to achieve something. zelensky throws another tantrum. and he turns to the same collective west not with a request, but with a demand that they be given immediately, i emphasize immediately, then another third

fourth and some holes in ukrainian military planning in ukrainian, if you want readiness in their ability to have all the necessary weapons to have all necessary ammunition. they give, but i don’t want to say in the next hours not always in the next days on the very real next week and what’s in under these conditions, the russian army manages to restrain the ukrainian offensive under the auspices of the collective west and wins me personally. this is very impressive, you can always do something better and you always have to learn from new experience and admit your mistakes, but so far it seems to me that the results of the russian army are very impressive, but at some stage a question arises. and how far? you

can drag out this war or allow this war to be dragged out against you in order to weaken russia. and at what stage and is this a general knows better than me. at what stage will russia decide that it has other resources that have not yet been used. and these resources may or may not be against the wishes of the russian leadership. these resources may begin to be seen as an unfortunate necessity in order to succeed, and by the way, i'm talking about far more than just nuclear weapons. even the weakest ones. but in england he writes a lot. we know this about the trans-atlantic cables that are central to the functioning of the western financial system. while trying to crush.