and i feel confident in frosty weather in stylish and warm jackets from adidas. buy with discounts on wildberries vks knows that difficult times require profitable solutions. bcs has a tariff without any commission for the purchase of securities. open the world of investment backs cinema one tv presents the people behind this door sew haute couture and work with imports. it's disgusting. it's not about the costume. and when you were taken to the section , they warned you that we have special clients here.

heartbreaker situation like this i met a girl and fell in love with her that we are discussing our wedding at your house tonight. cinema 1tv presents, well, how was your benefit performance , it was wonderful a sea of ​​flowers. and what was the name of this

friend? alexander r. pesen, but only relatives know about this. the thirst for self-expression does not give you peace, and friends say that a big stage is crying for you, fill out an application and participate in the international competition of authors. and who knows, maybe your song will be appreciated by the best producers, and your favorite idols will perform. we call the author on stage. this is your debut somewhere to be friends.

fantastic on thursday at the first general partner of the fantastic project, vtb bank, switch to a fantastically profitable vtb debit card and everything will work out.

i know it was scary. but it won't get any worse. you did quite well. your mother died not because your mother unclenched you because of unskilled help. unfortunately, this happens. people often die for a variety of reasons. we are generally very fragile beings. and we have only one way to become immortal. sorry for the atheism. these are kids. you were scared because you subconsciously connected your own death with the appearance of a child. sort of like a birth

curse. consider it now removed. you are alive? and you're great, can you give birth? do you want to do it yourself with the help of your surrogate mother? no, i'd rather take a day off today. great idea, i'll accompany you if i may. me with flashers. well, just explain why, so that you also understand that the child is not scary, i asked you. well, then just get used to your father's steering will come in handy. you know you. happily and if you think i'm ready

can we take it to the boil? living in a hotel somehow didn't really appeal to me motives with her. by the way, you have mine, awesome, so sad , some kind of normal me for a person whose bride has just changed with her grandfather, he's fine.

alexander andreevich where did my coffee go? coffee put coffee so that it does not spoil, please, in this life there are few things that can piss me off two. actually. this is when sorting through my things and the average mouth in relation to coffee. i don't know, they said on tv that you can now it means three more when referring to the

tv. alexander andreevich i cleaned it up. i left the medicine, as usual, did not shift anything. can i go? yes of course thank you. everything is fine. good evening, there is a big game on the air and today we will discuss the problems of russian world politics with mgimo experts today vladimir putin spoke on the phone with his turkish counterpart recep tay on erdogan and discussed the situation around the so -called grain deal during this conversation.

uh, the president of russia once again emphasized that moscow decision suspend do not stop. and to suspend its participation in this deal is due to the fact that the kiev regime, with the support of western curators, used the humanitarian corridor created under this deal to strike at russian infrastructure and the ships of the black sea fleet of sevastopol, which actually ensured it, ensured the security of this very corridor. and what to consider the restoration of the work of the grain deal. it is possible only after a detailed investigation of this e incident, as well as after receiving from kiev real guarantees of strict observance of the istanbul agreements, including. not using the humanitarian corridor for military purposes. well, tonight, the representative of the united nations at the joint coordination center in istanbul said that for tomorrow, november 2, the movement of ships along this humanitarian corridor is not planned. this is very

important. because even today. the same representation, he stated that today three ships with food nevertheless sailed from of ukraine to istanbul, therefore, along the corridor itself and that their movement was agreed upon by the delegations of ukraine , the united nations and turkey, without the participation of russia, considering that yesterday the russian ministry of defense stated that the movement of ships along this corridor is unacceptable, and vasyl nebenzya, russia’s permanent representative to the un. yesterday, he said at the corresponding meeting of the un security council that russia would, if necessary, independently stop and inspect here if they continue to walk along the corridor, in general, there was a risk of provocation and a sharp aggravation of the situation. well, despite the fact that the danger of a provocation using the grain route, apparently managed to prevent the danger of escalation in relations between russia and the west as a whole, alas, is increasing and connected. this is largely due to the fact that the

actions of ukraine's western patrons in the framework of a hybrid war against russia are becoming more and more provocative and less indirect . today, the press secretary of the president of russia, dmitry peskov, said that moscow has data confirming british involvement in both the nord stream sabotage and the recent drone attack on russian ships in sevastopol listen to what dmitry peskov said our special services have data and we proceed from this information, which indicate that the leadership and coordination of the operation to attack the sevastopol bays were carried out by the british in and consultants also have evidence that britain is involved in sabotage, and speaking in russian a terrorist act against vital international energy infrastructure, such actions cannot be left just like that, of course, we will think about further steps, without this it is impossible. well, in

turn, the official representative of the ministry of foreign affairs of russia, maria zakharova, said. today, what awaits from london an explanation regarding the recent statement of the founder of the file of exchangers. mega oplout and mega kim dotkov that a minute after the explosions at nord stream at the end of september. here is the then prime minister of great britain or rhinestones sent a message to united states secretary of state tony b linkin and dan. yes, that is, the deed is done and this message has been made. right after the terrorist attacks on the northern e, andrei andreevich streams well, you must admit that it is one thing. to act indirectly with ukraine's hands yes, it is another matter to directly carry out terrorist attacks against critical energy infrastructure, but to direct the actions of the kiev regime, for example , during attacks by drones on ships of the

black sea fleet. but you don't see here, uh, the risk of moving to the next level of escalation. britain tried to present this episode as a flag-planting operation. let me remind you that immediately there was a well-prepared information attack on russia with the accusation of our country that it allegedly caused damage to its own energy infrastructure, paradoxical, a little crazy rabble accusations, but in this information bubble, in which western societies are now and this seems to be some kind of effect in the isomer britain united states hands ukraine or actions indirectly carry out these false flag operations. at the moment , they do not publicly declare that we are doing them, we are doing them, guided by this unwritten code of the cold war that we are competing on the territory of third countries without directly participating in it. wherein. i think that

sensitive strikes against both the russian military command center and our strikes against the deployment of british military advisers on the territory of ukraine are being carried out, as are the entrances to during the cold war years, the practice of special services was to deliver symmetrical strikes on each other's infrastructure or on each other's actors , and hmm ironic. there were even episodes of a physical attack on one of the employees of representative offices from e. under the pretext, let's say some drunken brawl, and the diplomat received a black eye and a black eye. exactly. with the same eye, left or right, the diplomat received the next day means the country in which our diplomat was attacked, while the logic of what is happening fits into the classic canons of the cold war, but britain is probably the most irresponsible and for the actors from outside, supporting ukraine, is increasingly crossing. then the

red line can be said that this is no longer even a line, but the tape in a sense, because they have gone a few steps deeper, and i think that in the logic of what is happening, an inevitably critical situation that will hurt british interests. and this should be very well understood in london. well, of course, a hybrid war. involves action as mediated by hands. a proxy, this is ukraine in this case, and direct participation in sabotage against russia, but hidden participation, yes, here we are in the case of northern streams, we are dealing with this and it is really dangerous, and more and more. uh, that's it, more escalation, actually, uh, uh escalation topic. yes, the risk of escalation is literally hanging in the air these days, it is not by chance that today the norwegian government is transferring its armed forces to increased combat readiness. yes, this was stated by the prime minister of norway

, a nato country, a country neighboring russia. and even today, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of sweden, which intends to join nato. so far, only turkey and hungary have not ratified the relevant protocols. so today, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of sweden said that he recommends that the government of his country not establish any restrictions on part of sweden's obligations to nato regarding the possibility of deploying american nato military infrastructure on its territory, including nuclear weapons and the other day a similar decision was expressed by a similar position and, the government of finland e. nikolai yuryevich, after all , quite recently in the spring, when the issue of sweden joining nato in finland began to be discussed, it entered the practical plane, and in stockholm and helsinki they declared that they would not under any circumstances. well, or at least they don’t want to, but the united states is allowed

to post on them. they are now talking about the military infrastructure that they do not even rule out options for deploying nuclear weapons. e in your territory, that this is a hedging, let's say, uh, hypothetical risks, uh, in relation to russia, or is it also a reflection of the very escalation that is now happening in relations between russia and the west, well, pretty hedging of the risks of making yourself uh, without fail, the target of a nuclear or a massive conventional strike if the situation between russia and the united states escalates. it's anything but it's not risk reduction. i think it's just that the united states is mobilizing allies . the united states is mobilizing its allies and showing us its willingness to escalate

to the point of transferring nuclear weapons. even closer to our borders. it also tells us a lot about that, although i understand that now it already has a purely historical interest. this tells us a lot about what the founding act, russia, nato cost, what the stories of the united states cost that nato's military infrastructure does not threaten russia, it all cost nothing. of course, uh, it doesn't matter now. but uh for the future we are let's remember who we're dealing with. and, of course , russia will also not rule out any options and scenarios in terms of deploying its own strike missile forces and in terms of targeting them on the territory of the scandinavian countries if they also do not rule out any options regarding deployment, including nuclear weapons of the united states a on its territory. yes, but in fairness it must be said that so far the

united states is saying that they do not intend to place. uh, nuclear weapons on the territory of the new member countries on it's like u already, uh, joining the alliance, and e, joining the alliance. here poland is officially seeking, and in order for american nuclear weapons to be deployed on its territory in washington, uh, he says that he does not intend to. er tony damn movie still this story played a role in her resignation. that is, it can also be imagined as, well, certain or something? understanding? yes, let it be a violation, but still an understanding of some facets that today day cannot be passed. well, on the one hand, the policy of the united states as a whole, against the backdrop of increased risks of escalation, seems to me to be very hypocritical. today, just today , the white house once again stated that the united states is not looking for conflicts with russia and

really wants a negotiated solution. e, by e. ukraine on the other hand. today, the pentagon announced that they will give ukraine eight more air defense missile defense systems for sams. and today the visit to kiev of the junior deputy secretary of state of the united states karin domfried began, which actually discusses both the prospects for military assistance and the prospects for economic assistance to ukraine , that is, rhetoric, but negotiations. ah, the practice, uh, which excludes these negotiations in the foreseeable future, and now the realist-minded representatives of the american foreign policy community, just draw attention to this contradiction between the rhetoric and actions of the united states, and, uh, are sounding the alarm because. eh, in their opinion. this is not a conformity and continuation of american policy, which, apparently, after all, it is aimed at the strategic weakening of russia, yes, that is, the united states actually

does not hide it, but increases the risks of escalation of a and a, according to these representatives of the expert community. ultimately, it will weaken the position of the united states itself in the global world context. here, one of such or one of such realist-oriented experts is our good friend samcharov samel charov, who now works in the rental corporation. and his colleague in the same organization mirinda arrives. listen to an excerpt from uh, their joint article in foreign fs magazine it seems that the united states intends to maintain its current approach of helping ukraine regain as much territory as possible without provoking a large-scale war in washington constantly declares to help kiev as much as it needs and at least now almost rule out steps towards a diplomatic

solution to the conflict. in fact, the us and the g7 have already proposed a peace plan, but it looks like the conditions for the surrender of russia kiev returns all its territories receives reparations from moscow and signs a number of agreements in the field of security with the strange west, a statement that the result desired for the united states is a complete victory for ukraine could lead to a dangerous escalation or prolongation of the conflict indefinitely if the basis for future negotiations is laid , this may reduce the risk of such a development. well, listen to what sam chara is up to merenda. profit is offered as this very basis for possible future negotiations. for example, washington may begin consultations with allies and ukraine on the need to show openness to future negotiations and not promise the public a decisive victory for ukraine the united states may also make it clear that a negotiated settlement will not be an act of surrender,

finally the biden administration should consider keeping all channels of communication with the russian leadership in order to demonstrate openness to future discussions on ending the war and to be in contact with russia to activate peace talks, the time is right for this ivanovic, well, how do you assess charab's recommendations and profits and do you agree in general with his diagnosis that there is this discrepancy between rhetoric and practice, that it is dangerous? with e, the ascertaining part, if it is summarized in such a way that e is in different forms, but different experts , these experts in this form, they say, you will finish playing, the ascertaining part can only be looked for in one word. yes , play. and before i comment on their resulting part. i would still do a caveat about how much of a

realist sam is. well, yes, it’s like we know him as a realist, but, for example, when the same magazine, in april, in my opinion, conducted a survey of, uh, several dozen american experts about, well, now you consider nato expansion a mistake and there char was among those who said e definitely no, because there were gradations of the answer, maybe say so rather no, there yes, and he said definitely. no, yes, that is, if with all this, a person continues to say that nato expansion uh, that's good. it wasn't a mistake. we already know that it was a tragic mistake one country was ruined as a result of this expansion process. e nato well , realism already raises some questions. now about the resulting part. what to do? frankly, a lot of words. here in

this resulting part of such a streamlined lay the foundations, maybe start the process of starting what huh? that is, well, everything is very streamlined, but uh, if in a simple way, then it all boils down to the fact that let's not throw ukraine into battle. let's we will put ukraine at the negotiating table. and let her come to an agreement with russia well, in the end it comes down to this. yes, maybe, for now it’s like, let’s politely ask ukraine, but everyone knows that ukraine was hung up to ask for the kiev regime. well, no use. she tells you there zelensky or one of his henchmen just barks at you and that's it. that is, it’s only strictly possible there, well, as a matter of fact, and the american special services are talking to them there , here’s an order and do it, then, uh. what is here , let's put e ukraine at the negotiating table. and

let uh, the kiev regime negotiate with russia, but the fact is that if this is a puppet, that is, you understand, this is a warring puppet, if she was brought to the negotiating table and forced to sit down. what is the point of negotiating with her then it is necessary to negotiate with the owner. and what is the owner willing to do? it’s under, as the theater writes, to think about whether to try at some point to put a puppet in your puppet at the negotiating table. this means that there is no one to talk to, despite what i will repeat again. so i, in my opinion, dmitry vyacheslavovich already said this to you that we are in a strange situation, when it usually happens, like what? it is clear with whom, but it is not known what to agree on, right? this is what usually happens in a diplomat. and here, in principle, it is clear what to agree on, because at the end of last year russia set out quite realistic

positions for agreements. but it's such a fair offer that there isn't much room for bargaining. we have something to agree on, but practically nothing to bargain and how not to paradoxically, there is no one to agree on this with, here. but in diplomacy, it happens that there is someone, but it is not clear how to reach an agreement, but here it is clear. what should be contractual, but it is not clear with whom to achieve them, therefore, these are the arguments that you will finish the game, you need to do something. well, yes, correct reasoning. but it's still so far from moving the us administration to something that, well, unfortunately, uh, they probably watched your broadcasts, no deeper than before june. i'm with you i agree, but ivan alekseevich i don’t know how much they look, they probably look, but in russian they say charov, for sure. look, i even know

what they are watching, but the tragedy of this situation lies in the fact that samel charov is the most constructive wing of the mainstream of the american foreign policy establishment? well, at least of those who are allowed to access the magazines and you say that there is nothing to talk about with them even now, given that we have now been presented with the most constructive most realistic, yes the point of view of the generally liberal yes sam enchantment. he is, in his convictions, rather a liberal, he is very close to the democrats in his time. he even worked at the center of american progress, and he was very close to the administration. barack obama a. but now pay attention to the staunch democrat and liberal with his charms. still, i do not agree with the policy pursued by the biden democratic administration and recommend changes to this policy. yes , let it be very streamlined. yes, but that's just it, and

that's what it is. space distance between russia and the united states today, and what is the most constructive point of view that can be presented in the american establishment seems to us a point of view from which there is simply nothing to talk about. yes, this is the situation in which we are now, well, in any case, but exactly in a week, and the main day will take place. in the midterm elections in the united states, in congressional elections, the entire house of representatives and a third are elected, and the senate public opinion forecasts, and today , and the republicans should take control of the senate, the situation remains unclear, but the house of representatives, most likely, passes under the control of the republicans and one of the main reasons for the unpopularity of the democrats. this is the economic

position. e in the united states e the highest inflation in the last 40 years, and high prices for e, energy carriers record high prices, actually for gasoline e, at gas stations. and here in this situation a week before the main voting day. uh, biden's president goes uh, another populist move. he threatens to increase the income tax on energy companies if the shadows agree, just as if administratively ordered to lower prices. listen to his statement here. one after another, the major oil companies are reporting record profits. their profits are military windfalls , windfalls from the violent conflict that is ravaging ukraine and hurting tens of millions of people around the world. they are required to act in in the interest of their consumers, their community and their country, to invest in america through increased production and processing

capacity. they don't want to do it. they have the ability to lower prices for consumers at gas stations, you know, if they don't, they will pay higher taxes on their excess profits and face other restrictions. my team will be working with congress to consider all the options available to us. it's time for these companies to stop profiting from the war. yegor alexandrovich here. as do you think that such measures will make it possible to cope with the energy crisis, or is it pure populism? well , when elections are soon in the united states, usually economic ones, these statements should be divided by 10 there by 15, and the fact is that inflation itself in the united states , which has put economic policy in front of such a fork. yes, we support economic growth, or we fight inflation. it is caused not only by energy. this is, in general, such a large-scale trend, both for developed and developing countries since last year and in february mw wrote high inflation in the world and so on. it is clear that now the energy industry is making the main contribution to the growth in prices, but such

initiatives. firstly, they are most likely really populist, you noticed a gentleman there, uh-huh, i almost wiped my nails while i was behind the biden, and the problem is what, uh, in the united states now. in general, well, not a record, of course, production volumes, but quite decent compared to even the nineteenth year before the crisis. according to the american energy agency, uh, current production levels. well, in general, most likely, they will not correspond to the level of demand that will be there in the thirtieth year, for example, we see the same with the international energy agency. this means that oil companies and gas companies need to invest, that is, launch new investment cycles, unlike europe in the united states in general, there is a certain increase in investment in the energy sector. now we will take an additional part of the profits from e-oil companies, where they come from will draw money for investment, taking into account. well, such a not-so-good position in the credit market. at the same time, biden is silent that in

the cost of gasoline and the cost of diesel there, for example, 30% in total. this is an excise tax collected by the center and collected by the states. well, on average, if we're across all states, we'll see. well, if you want to lower the value, lower the excise tax. ugh why not? by the way, you are very right here. it seems to me that in many ways the policy of the biden administration, huh? which prevents energy companies make the necessary investments in the energy sector and has led to the current crisis situation. they pay attention to it. many republicans, of course, again. in the run-up to the election, they criticized the administration. it is also necessary to divide by 10, or even by 20, but it seems to me that there is a grain of truth in this. listen to what, of course, he made a pre-election statement on this matter, but still . e republican senator. john baras joe bytes put america in such a position, when we have a piece of paper hanging on our backs with the inscription me

president biden's greatest sin is to deny america's energy independence we had it now we don't have it so i'm not surprised that saudi arabia is doing to us the way they did. there is a solution here, this is a more american energy solution, but joe biden and every democrat who is running this year who is in the house or senate has a different point of view, they do whatever these climate extremists tell them to do. and what do they require this leftmost group, and they overlap. they are suffocating us energy production, which is hurting us they are consuming our emergency energy sources. we are in a state of energy war, and the president does not want to admit it again. a. what is the share of pure politics and electoral rhetoric here. what is the grain of truth in these accusations that are thrown against the democratic administration. well, let's divide again, of course, by how much we don't know here, by what

factor, er, but the question is. what in terms of alternative energy sources 100% biden administration, it is clear for them. there are no questions here, the republican is right. we agree with him, and according to the forecast of the american energy agency itself, the share of renewable energy will indeed grow, but it will not reach the oil and gas dollar in the balance of energy production in the united states, where it will still remain in the first and second place by the thirtieth year. ah, well, the biden administration made a very big contribution to the development of the energy industry in the united states because gas production, for example, is growing at a very fast pace, largely due to exports in the structure of unfortunate means imports of energy resources in the european union, the share of the united states has increased very strongly from 7% in the twenty-first year to 17%. this is only in the second quarter of 22 years. so basically. the energy industry can say thanks to baidun for his policy of simply predatory policy towards the same domestic and

foreign markets. that's all. we will now break for a short commercial and then continue to talk about situation in the united states on the eve of the midterm elections, dear friends, and it seems, after all. traitor the russians can't feed this case for any money, i have a plan b. you don't love it,

you use it. can you show everyone how russians play, feel or love 11 silent men premiere november 4th on pervoi do we need money to buy, how much can we approve in the bank? let's see tinkoff, you can find out the amount of a loan for a business without a scan-customer of a certificate from the usr of contracts with counterparties photo 3x4 without going to the bank and most importantly, without opening an account, just upload an extract from your bank, only an extract, only an extract. leave an application on tinkoff.ru and find out the loan amount without opening an account

. the sale has started, 11 11 on ozone right now, the technop neo-2 smartphone for 10.990 rubles. discounts on designers up to 50% sale 11 11 on yandex.market buy a vitek submersible blender for only 990 rubles. november 9th to 11th. the most delicate ice cream in exquisite

chocolate icing is a pure line, unrealistically delicious ice cream, you don’t want to finish reading it, because it’s a cool book. it was the most amazing world in this sector, it captivated tourists with extraterrestrial landscapes, and archaeologists with the ruins of civilizations. suddenly, euphoria showed us her true colors. the storm has opened. another secret is easy for me to part with the good ones. do you know how much longer we will be presenting the new line book service from mts read books. listen to podcasts and audiobooks in a convenient app only in lines mike omer's house of fear

and other exclusives novelties bestsellers. nothing will happen. why will i have a love story and a detective story? what about you yet? lines, where one good book follows, another draw up osago on sravni and save up to 5.5 thousand rubles. if insurance, then compare healthy can not be delicious, we have prepared for you something convincing without excess sugar, salt and fat healthy hyphen. nutrition.rf is an individual program delicious recipes from simple and inexpensive products calorie calculator articles with recommendations, healthy nutrition hyphen.rf. ozone delivers it to your taste with love, up to 30% discounts on baby food frutonanny and polaris coffee machine with a discount of up to 75% teloron the north star guards your health from influenza and sars we have always admired you those who break horizons without forgetting

words . living in a vast country on which the sun never sets. you already have 25 million of those who trust us and we are doing everything to have the right to say tinkoff bank of the year in russia they will meet in the ring to sort things out like a man. oh, for the world title live broadcast due to abu dhabi november 5 on first do you think you are the strongest or the smartest? think about yourself, what you want you will show the fight liga stavok bright fights in one application. there's a big game on the air, and a

week before the midterm congressional elections. ah. in the political heat of the political passions of the united states and the intensity of the political struggle. it's just overwhelming. well, in fact, everyone is considering this midterm congressional election as a kind of referendum of confidence in the current administration. or distrust, and also here in the current american political environment. this is also a very important litmus test. trust or distrust of support or non-support of donald trump, who remains the most popular republican politician and it is expected that many of his supporters should just come to the house of representatives, er, by the results of the midterm elections and and these results of these elections will play a very important role in trump's decision. whether to go not to go to e, the presidential elections are already in 24 and in this regard. united the states have already begun to inflate fear about the

probable and possible return of donald trump, and in politics yes, and in particular his participation in the presidential campaign, and now newsk magazine, came out with a huge simple article about the horror that, according to the magazine, will begin if donald trump will return to the white house listen, one can only speculate about the details of the donald trump program, if he is elected to the presidency of the united states in 2024, however, the main directions of his policies are already obvious about this in interviews reported according to sources close to the former president, trump will not appoint people who will restrain him from rash decisions; instead, he is going to recruit loyal staff, the former president is also going to increase control over the military in order to consolidate his power. he will significantly reduce the number of civil servants and take a number of measures in the spirit. a channel of populism that will find a significant response

among its electoral base, such a course could lead to even more disfranchisement of various segments of the population, including african american lgbt qs and native americans, the irs fbi and the army can be used to harass and prosecute political opponents of trump, foreign policy will be radically revised, the former president will return to his confrontational approach towards european allies and resume friendship with vladimir putin may sink into oblivion and basic democratic principles, for example, the constitutional ban on nomination for the third presidential term andrey andreevich well, you know , such fears, to be honest, they remind me, but such an exaggerated version, and the presidential campaign in russia in the ninety-sixth year. remember, vote or lose, there and so on, but only they have it all much more drawn, yes, and much more. yes, sharply ah, well, here is barack obama

, who is now actively campaigning for the democratic party. says the basic foundations of democracy in the united states are under threat. here's how you would describe them the degree of political enmity of the united states, it has reached the highest degree, can be seen, this is not only from these publications. democrats fear that the january 6, 2021 scenario, which is seen as a nightmare, will now be a legitimate republican tactic. uh. i think this statement greatly exaggerates trump's intent, the intention of the republican party. this whole discussion shows the deeply unhealthy nature of political competition in the united states, and the americans themselves emphasize that there has never been a situation in which the consensus between republicans and democrats on the key issues of national life broke up. not only the economics of

foreign policy, but the whole structure of the political system. important demographic maps that show the demographic distance between the electorate of democrats and republicans, their geography of settlement, uh, indicates that in case of ambiguous presidential election results. this can lead to massive popular uprisings. let not the civil war for an episode like the sixth january. and for this. now it is already planned to militarily with the forces of reinforced police squads to ensure the security of polling stations in a special way, apparently, the capital will be strengthened on the eve of the elections and, in general, the democrats are counting on the fact that

or they simply add kerosene here in europe and then they themselves go about their business and latin america and, of course, this strongly contradicts the course towards global leadership in the 21st century, which the democrats and republicans of

reality proclaim in all doctrinal documents that they are now releasing in batches. and when there is such a deep mess at home, it’s hard to think about how to equip the universe and this well-known metaphor that we have already given a barrel to the garden and jungle similar jungle already at home begin to grow absolutely, but uh, it seems to me that the jungle just grows from the united states i agree. uh, first of all, uh, we even discussed it. this. uh, around this table, that the europeans look with great concern at the turbulence that is taking place in the american domestic politics, because what about without american leadership? yes, it's unusual. this is generally it. this does not fit in the head, especially for the germans, whose political elite is the most committed linkage and subordinate linkage with the united states, but i want to draw attention to what has already become, as it were, a

tradition, or something, but this year the american domestic politicians call their opponents a threat to the security of the country a threat to the mere survival of the country of its political system. eh, her foreign policy, its position in the world, and so on. yes, and this just characterizes the state of political civil war that the united states is in. well , if there is a week left before the midterm elections , then there are 2 weeks left before the g20 summit in bali. and the option of meeting during this summit on the sidelines of this summit of joe biden, who is likely to arrive there after the midterm elections, is being discussed. not with very strengthened domestic political positions and we are sitting pina, who will come to the field with a very strengthened domestic political position following the results of the twentieth congress, a chinese e, communist party a.

it is not clear whether this meeting will take place or not. uh, the united states is clearly working on something. just recently, tony blinken spoke to e on the phone with one and the chinese foreign minister a before that bathed and spoke to nicholas benson, who saved the united states in china, a-a. in fact, the result is very modest. uh, the official statements from those phone calls conversations. they say that e us-chinese relations continue to deteriorate rapidly and but in fact this is not surprising. yes, because 2 weeks before a , the united states themselves published a national defense strategy in bali. which was called china the main not only geopolitical, but military competitor and opponents of the united states listen to an excerpt from the national defense strategy, usa a comprehensive and serious

challenge to us national security is the increasingly aggressive desire of china to change by force order in the endo-pacific region and reshape the international system to suit its authoritarian interests the prc seeks to undermine the american system of alliances and partnerships in the field of security in the endo-pacific region using its growing economic and military power, including economic influence and the expanding military presence of the people's liberation army, to intimidate neighboring countries and threaten their interests. increasingly provocative rhetoric of the prc and its actions towards taiwan destabilize the situation create risks of miscalculation and threaten peace in the taiwan strait. china is comprehensively developing and modernizing its armed forces in order to neutralize the military advantages of the united states, so the people's republic of china is the main challenge that determines the direction of the ministry of defense. united states

in alekseevich a can the united states and the united states department of defense meet this challenge without changing their policy toward russia and toward the ukraine conflict differently? in other words, can they handle two military challenges by two military adversaries at the same time. and dmitry islavievich, once you put down such a question. i will answer it. briefly, what do you u do u answer another question that you didn't ask. no, they can't. this is a technical issue. they can not deal with russia from china at the same time. they would not have been able to cope with us alone, and when they come at us, like this, it means that they are actually against us. well, this cannot be said, the union yes, but very close cooperation russian chinese. they oppose nothing more than the union more than the union yes, uh soyu-, uh

cooperation, which is not limited by anything. yes , now there was such a chinese official uniform, but, it strikes me a little different, not even what strikes, but i want to state this, because it is very important. after all, before the americans somehow explained. why is their leadership needed? well, it kind of explains. yes, that the world will be prosperous from this, that there will be less. conflicts that will be able to develop the economy faster and in fact, that's why some used to run under the american nuclear nuclear umbrella. here is what is being said now. we're just the boss. it's just that we are the main ones, and everyone who tries to act independently. he poses a threat to us, that is, a positive agenda from the americans. no, no americans are playing. uh, now they have two cards, as it seems to them, these are wonderful such trump cards, with which they are actually going to beat both russia and china, one

trump is used against russia, the other trump stored against china means that for trump against russia these are geopolitical suicide bombers any member of the american union is a geopolitical suicide bomber who, if necessary, is used up. here we are now seeing this in the example of ukraine and, by the way, such nice and well-equipped countries as finland and sweden and it seems to them that they go under the american umbrella, perhaps yes, even the nuclear umbrella. they seem to be more reliable. perhaps, they think so, in fact, the americans tried through the nato infrastructure to reach russian borders. here they tried to push through belarus yes, organize it. there, internal coups to get out on the border with russia tried to do it through e through ukraine, well. here, in the place of the finns, i would be very worried about this

, but apparently the dauphins have not yet reached it, or at least it’s impossible to talk about it. well, you can’t talk about it, so the kozyr is used against russia by these henchmen, who are thrown into battle. but america has another trump card , they think that this trump card is even better. yes even this is the trump card of a dozen dozen states that are very uncomfortable with such world instability. these countries depend on international trade dependent on international markets. they very recently had a poor population a few decades ago, but only one generation. well, it's more or less normal. eh, it's okay to live. yes, there people have the opportunity to send their children to school system appears. uh, there in healthcare and there are dozens of developing countries, they value

this world stability, which gave them the opportunity to begin to develop at least a little bit, and not even a little bit in general, by investing their strength and talents of demonic stability even from geometric stability. and so, the united states why do they start this whole demological game before the meeting, uh, the g20, because there are leaders of those who represent such sentiments, that is, about half of the g20. these are those who are ready to move on to sovereign development - this is a strange brix. well, for now, it's less than a quarter of twenty. yes, this is such a real faction that is ready to move on to sovereign development, an operation not on someone’s thunderous order, but on their own ideas and their own system, but on relations with the outside world, but the majority are in the top twenty. well, firstly, there is a faction of the seven who are in favor of a hygienic

order, and the rest of the members of the twenty - these are those who feel very uncomfortable with world instability in the united states, in fact, hiding behind them, from my point of view, their game. which do they want to go out? look for china. you see, they all require you to come to an agreement with us. well, you know that it is impossible to negotiate with us, except on our terms, therefore it is not you who are inferior to us. here say american diplomats, china well, or create such an atmosphere. it's you for the sake of these dozens of states. and if you do not make concessions to us. they will hate you, in fact, in fact. you also understand this kind of extras for americans as world extras, which they just hide behind play these, but these moods. yes, you see, it is difficult to cross over to a small and medium-sized state. on the rails of independent development, they need some kind of international international system

, and the united states is speculating on this, and this is exactly what , from my point of view. they are going to put pressure on china at the g20 to create this psychological atmosphere, when china, as it were, for the sake of these people, it's strange how a responsible power should ultimately make concessions to the united states. i think it's so primitive the game, like some other primitive games of the americans and the british , will not work in the g20, and then we will see the next wave of discrediting and playing pranks on china for allegedly showing irresponsibility, but in fact, just independence. it seems to me that it is very stupid for the united states to try to play such a game in the twenty format, because in the twenty countries themselves, which value their serf dependence on the united states and be afraid to go free from being afraid, as it were getting rid of this fortress envy is very little.

and these are european countries. japan yes, germany is really afraid. so far, the german elite is afraid to overcome this dependence on the united states. but the same saudi arabia is also a member of the g20. yes, i think she has already overcome. such complexes operate independently, and the case of saudi arabia is just a very clear confirmation of what you were talking about, that this american gigamistic stability is becoming, firstly, less and less stable, and secondly, less and less benevolent, and the united states, not only in relation to opponents, such as china and russia, just act as if using a club with a whip, yes, and also in relation to allies who allow you the slightest independence. yes, saudi arabia did not vote the way it was required, and everything is being discussed from washington already there, uh, some kind of sanctions against saudi arabia and the white house speaks of a review of us-saudi relations. that is, it is no longer a

benevolent hegemony. this is exactly the hard one hegemony, where apart from sans and blackmail in the united states there really isn't much to offer, including your own ally . modern, uh, military confrontation on two levels agrees, and the former deputy deputy secretary of defense of the united states and now a professor at johns hopkins university, and thomas munky, yes, who believes that if the united states is drawn into a double war. e with russia and china, they will suffer a military defeat. here listen to a quote from his article in the form of a face. despite washington's announcement of a focus on countering china and russia , us defense planning falls short of the task in 2015, the us department of defense revised its policy for the first time in a long time .