such assurances of ukraine are given in the non-use of these humanitarian corridors for military purposes. in this regard, i have given instructions to the ministry of defense to resume our full participation. in this work, at the same time, russia reserves the right to withdraw from these agreements, and in the event that these guarantees are violated by ukraine, e, but in any case even if russia withdraws from this deal. and as we said in this connection earlier. and in this case, we will be ready to supply the entire volume of grain that was delivered from the territory of ukraine to the poorest countries. amazing examples of unity are shown in the collective west in an attempt to hide the activities of american biological laboratories on the territory of ukraine the un security council did not

adopt the russian draft resolution on the establishment of a commission to investigate the military biological program of the united states three dozen secret laboratories of the pentagon were supposed to conduct prohibited experiments for the start of the investigation voted by russia and china v usa uk france others abstained b luhansk ahead of schedule the first patients received a new multifunctional general medical center. area 11.000 m² military builders. it was erected in record time at the facility around the clock , almost 1,000 people worked in the spring on the site of the advanced complex was a wasteland. now the hospital accepts everyone who needs help, including high-tech, which people could not get under the kiev regime. russian schoolchildren won seven awards at the international competition for young inventors. it was held in indonesia gold at muscovites. so, the expert jury highly appreciated the device for diagnosing lung disease, in particular, the project of nastya eliseeva, and sasha sukhotsky and mark

baranov developed a container for automatic dispensing of medicines. in total, representatives of sir, 45 countries of the world fought for victory in the competition. such news to this minute. see you soon. actually you and the word sergey alexandrovich i'll tell you, so when i regularly get along in ukrainian public and watch, i am ukrainian tv channels. i'm getting envious. that is, i understand that in fact we should not be doing the same thing that we should be teaching them military propaganda. it is they who should have analyzed our stories. while a friend is talking, listen, it's a pity that we didn't go to moscow to study. for the last 15 years, and after all , the eldest can take it in the information war, and wash it with all the help. here is borscht, we ate all

day long, and now we are learning on the go. we're studying. in kiev, as information is being conducted, it is a shame to pronounce it. actually. it's embarrassing to say. we, what, we were not preparing for military action. we didn't understand who we're dealing with, we didn't have 8 years left. excuse me, for 8 years every day we could watch ukrainian tv channels and see how they are progressing precisely in the information war. a whole generation of professionals was raised there. that is, when we say that the name is led by some kind of english specialists. i will tell you. so i spent some time in kiev ukrainian marketing ukrainian advertising back in the 2000s. well, they were at the level of moscow, that is, there were several generations of excellent professionals there were further brains reformatted. the next task was to secure funding that was not plundered. it was not stolen. it was

launched and is working today every day for the victory because they keep it in their heads. we are at war. we must win. this is what we are saying, here we are conducting a special military operation. our brothers are there. we must not dehumanize seriously. yes, but climb up and look there, and the publics that our soldiers lead. this is not small, where there are hundreds of thousands of subscribers, and who has 200 300 for them there is an enemy for them there are no ukrainians, they call them germans. they call them germans in the minds of those who are at the front, there are hundreds of thousands of soldiers at the front, it is our business here to provide for the enemies. just full support for them, they must know for sure that here you lol everything is for them. here they do everything for them. that is what doesn't work. now it will be done. tomorrow in a week in a month, but they must know for sure that the rear is here, and not peaceful

russia, which, well, somehow, is a member of a civilized community, we were expelled from civilized community. it's true. no, if someone feeds, some people about it, yes michael then we no longer torture a long time ago we are no longer members. here is the very thing that you call a patriotic civilized community in short, please. yes, you have no iran north korea nikolaev. you speak with contempt. what is the second grade? wait wait, stop. i'm fishing here. well , who are you iranians, right? korea well this is so it 's highlighting the fact who supported russia in the un vote four countries. well how funny is that were supporting you international political scientist so to speak. well, why are you talking so funny at the level of the third grade of a secondary moscow school - this is from this. you won't get rid. you understand that before that, he walked around mid and specifically threatened.

let me tell you, it's true. well, i don’t know why we should return to this, but god bless him. okay, let’s get back, and dmitry polyansky, the permanent representative of russia, spoke on the air and told him that employees were now talking to him. he says listen well, you know, i have children here. i am quoting directly. my children go to school here demo, how else could i say, this time. so the american diplomat is right. they do already have to do. everything is correct. i’m not in this sense, well, they just went around everyone , threatened someone, promised someone not to give a loan to someone else, they bypassed something, stupidly everything, so these guys are the results of free will. here is the vote. but i think it's not. who's there? what thinks, this is the one there unfortunate four countries. so they allowed themselves to abstain, or so to speak, well, yes, just such a voice in this vote. it equals support. if yes, if not superior, yes, because under these conditions, at least the pressure of mike's pressure is that you abstained

from voting. this is hidden, this fig in your pocket, thereby your american diplomats who went and threatened, where do you not understand this? well to what well to what? this. well, true. well, even more than that, what a vulgarity. here, it seems that we are saying that the united states is a superpower, but the really gigantic huge led. it's strange, well, sometimes she acts like a small pathetic one. i don't know bibirev's gopota because i speak. yes , like the un well, in theory, after all, this should be a state structure, so to speak, but they are nice, which means that they don’t give visas to our diplomats there, so that they, well, sometimes they just delay them so that they don’t have time and we just don’t give them. well, how petty and how pathetic it is, lord, how unworthy it is , in general, a big great country, excuse me, michael for my emotionality, please. you know, when we say almost now

a dirty word michael's institutions i want to say that today all existing international institutions are the instrument of the united states of america today all the leaders representing the civilized world uh-huh except korea, nicaragua and other countries, yes, all are trained and cultivated leaders of the special services the united states of america already knows this. it's not some. there sensation is not news. today you exposed the wire by holding it in the last time you are fighting for your unipolar world and you understand how it destroys, and the worst thing for you is how, in my opinion, who yevgeny

primakov once said the problem for you is the absence of an enemy, then the soviet union was destroyed and russia became a better foreign minister, a better minister. there was finance, then in the world you determined with reserves of 20 million, which had not unpaid military personnel, missing any prospect of destroying the defense industrial complex. that's all you did. you created the conditions for the countries not to be the soviet union, then they took up russia today and you have one problem. e there is in russia a certain leadership in the person of the president around him, a serious association of patriotic people who respond extremely seriously. for

all your outings, when they say that we don't have any friends, you know the bike. i always want to say. that's as far as i can remember, i have there have always been portraits of alexander iii stolypin and a bust, uh, and without zhukov well, of course, with a portrait of the president, alexander iii said, in russia there are one friends two friends, the army and the navy. so today, my friend, so far, these friends have not entered the work. they are in a state of preparation, and we don’t give a damn about your grouping in our russia, so far we are playing with you like a cat with a cat and you don’t fully understand this, warning you. and the fact that you and pakistan ukraine right? about our

allies michael convincingly i know dynamo they played very dynamic attacking football with lightning speed, moving from one end of the field to the other. his legs rotated, unlike ordinary people, they had a wider, so to speak , range, so they were allowed to hit from any position. they enjoyed life so much that they even survived this war that they can play football and the frontline scout pulled me off the field from that moment. i was looking for it for several years and now i found here the dynamo operation or the adventures of the russians in britain tomorrow at the first continuity and

military traditions of russian commanders and russian soldiers. let's talk in our special project jointly by the ministry of culture of the first channel of the classics and we don shines with military glory, like in the old days again the battle of poltava is an abusive goal. borodin from the battle of mamaev yes , the battles for the donbass from oleg da chapaev glorious story stretches ancient names of cities we learn in orders and village after village the heart enters every day. hello slavgorod ivanovka lugi

not the ends of the pool are sharp, the first call was cleared . berezan, like a child in labor , will be born twice, dear. we are the earth liberated from the sworn enemy. denis maidanov read a 1943 poem by samuil yakovlevich marshak the way of glory. dobryi dobryi information channel on pervy continues its work on the air time to remember, my name is alexander gordon the united states and other western countries continue to supply all the necessary weapons with money the kiev regime was recently adopted just the other day a

message came in the department of a new military aid package let's see kyiv. the us department of defense has announced the approval of a military assistance package for ukraine worth up to $275 million, the package includes additional munitions for highmax 500 artillery shells, more than 1,300 anti-tank systems, small arms, and four satellite communications antennas. and the other day, quietly , almost imperceptibly, the anniversary of 100 years passed, as the civil war in russia ended. why remember this now, because there are experts, analysts, there are quite a lot of them who continue to draw parallels with what is now is happening and what happened then, considering it almost a reincarnation of that same civil war. let's remember the events of a hundred years ago. october 25 marked the 100th anniversary of the

end of the primorsky operation, it was she who put an end to the civil war of 1918-192, and the word intervention became the key then. when the civil war began in russia, all major western countries. they acted the same way. they saw this as a chance to turn internal turmoil into an explosion that would divide the country into separate fragments of the state that they had planned. to plant their manual modes, not only the former opponents in the first world war, germany , austria-hungary and turkey, but also the allies of great britain, france and the usa plus japan, sent their troops to the territory of russia, capturing literally separate regions. here is what white guard mikhail bulgakov wrote about the role of the allies in his novel, if you are told that the allies are rushing to our rescue. believe it or not, allies. bastards this is just about helping the white movement the first tranche of kornilov's volunteer army transferred in february of the eighteenth year 100,000 rubles. money

listed the representative of france in kiev through the donbass in the civil war the front line between the reds and whites passed twice, the participants in the battles in the donetsk basin said that the same settlement could pass from one hand to another many times. for example, the village of konstantinovka was alternately controlled by the reds or whites 29 times, a member of the white movement, general keller ’s memoirs, tells how the western allies brought tanks that had never been seen before, the commander-in -chief did not have any new reserves for us, but little by little rumors began to spread that more tanks were arriving on our sector of the front, monsters of equipment we had never seen before, sent by the british as a new weapon that played a big role. on the western front in france, these tanks were sent to the south of russia a month or two before, but earlier our volunteers had to be taught to work with them and formed. your divisions, and this is almost the first experience of their use in battles with the

russian team, fell to our share of an approximately logical policy. we see the west now 100 years ago. the west covered up its efforts to destroy russia by allegedly rejecting the ideas of bolshevism. and now creating a ram from ukraine. against russia, western countries hide behind the slogans of european integration and democracy at the beginning of hostilities in february 2022 , the united states alone allocated more than 55 billion euros to ukraine in the form of military financial and humanitarian assistance, but kiev is still not enough. ukraine does not have a cent, zelensky said and asked the allies to allocate $17 billion to kiev, and immediately the european union announced its readiness to allocate another 18 billion euros. ukraine has told us that they need about 3-4 billion euros per month to cover their basic needs. these three or four billion should be provided by the european union. with american friends and

international financial institutions, kiev asks and asks for money and the west gives it so far. but for loans. we will have to pay not the zelensky and kiev oligarchs, but several generations of ordinary ukrainians, of course, in order to pay off old loans, we have to take new ones with even more extortionate conditions. this means that debt does not stop growing, the social responsibility of the state is almost zero, and the country transfers loans to its companies to western creditors almost free of charge. the costs provided by the west to kiev are already estimated at a solid figure of $ 28.5 billion for this war, which is not going to end yet. not only money, but also military equipment goes to kiev from almost all nato countries . . yes , almost everything for waging war, western intelligence services do not hide what they plan. all ukrainian military operations provide assistance,

nato intelligence data, officers are fighting in ukraine under the guise of mercenaries elon musk, using starlink , provides everything with free internet and data from his satellites. however, despite the assistance that kiev is currently receiving, it may be left without us support due to the economic crisis and the upcoming congressional elections, this is already being talked about in washington as the price of american military assistance to ukraine grows, and the us economy balances on the verge of recession once strong bipartisan support for washington, cracks began to appear in order to provide the support kiev needed to protect it from russia. there really are parallels , then military and economic assistance was also provided, but then they did not hesitate to try on themselves, just the clothes of the participants in the conflict now . and

who is involved? no one is participating. we are our hut there we know nothing. if aid to ukraine from all sources ceases now, how long will its existence last? i think as soon as we we learn that aid will be terminated. we will immediately see that zelensky will either be liquidated, or maybe he will try to find political asylum, somewhere, because a country that pays attention to these figures owes 300-84 billion dollars at the moment and which can not continue. actually, some kind of hostilities with russia in this regard. by the way, you need to understand that this is an investment conditionally western . we are ready to give loans. we are ready to give military assistance, if only to annoy russia, she, to put it, again in the language of economists and financiers. you know, this is such a very high-risk portfolio, because theoretically it may pay off if russia loses. well, in my opinion, and

this is what military experts are talking about in the first place, there is, in principle, no such scenario, respectively. and as soon as the aid stops, not just ukrainian statehood. not just ukray machine, ukrainian society will be bankrupt honestly, i, uh, i have no enthusiasm there again. it doesn't call, but it will a real humanitarian catastrophe, because nothing will be paid for social obligations, because there is no energy, because there is no food, because there is no work, and most importantly, there are no those who are ready to continue to pay for ukraine to be a bargaining chip in the fight against russia therefore, here are objectively ukrainians. they know they are in such a confusion, what awaits them, they do not even understand. well, as long as there is russia, they paid and will pay. they themselves say that this is not help, not a loan. this is an investment in security of america and europe 60 billion investment. american officials tell us directly with their mouths . yes, it is not issued. it is not issued by

loans. it is very important to understand this investment in the american military-industrial complex and in no way. of course, these are not loans, but you have raised an interesting topic. why then did they try on the clothes of the parties to the conflicts, because then there was no smokyization as it is now, a colossal dehumanization and dehumanization of russians, dehumanization, including ukrainians, because the americans are theirs, in my opinion, they do not perceive us as each person individually, who are there each separate world. it must be protected and so on, they perceive it as a means of solving their problems. the destructuring of russia, if they did not perceive every ukrainian as a person, they would then send not only their equipment and ghostly instructors via the internet. then they would have closed the sky of ukraine, nato troops did not enter romania , that is, they behaved in a completely different way, therefore

colossal pre-humanization, pure money everywhere. and since, uh, nothing personal, they’ll just pay money so that they don’t run away from them, the european union as soon as they don’t provide ukraine with money, and it won’t be able to waging its fight, europe will immediately understand that it will border russia immediately europe will decide that america does not protect it and will begin to negotiate with russia on gas with the chinese , the resumption of this turnover. the americans will do everything to prevent this from happening, therefore. yes, this is an investment ukraine uses this investment ukraine has no other chance to protect itself. like this looks. yes, humanization in action. there is such you know the international court of the united nations. there is the head of this fund, jan, donaks. it's about the participation of non-participation, she was asked a direct question, based on the 1907 convention on the rights and obligations of neutral parties. in the event of a war, what is happening now? she

well, let's hear what she says. the sixth article of the second convention states that any supply, directly or indirectly, by a neutral power to a belligerent power of warships of ammunition or other types of war material is prohibited. so my question is, does he consider all these countries in europe, the united states that supply ukraine with ammunition, train the military as neutral powers, or are they countries of conflict, as the court we have no opinion on legal issues of a general nature that are not presented to us in the framework of cases . we can't, like in court, consider issues that might , uh, be relevant in a broader sense to the conflict you mentioned, but that don't stand before us. sorry but we are we simply cannot answer this question. broke down she can't really give

political commentary. this is not political . file a lawsuit, submit materials, we will appoint competent judges, they will consider. she cannot comment on current politics, but she could admit. yes, it could have been more elegantly stated that yes. such a convention exists for the year 970. it was signed by such and such countries, then this is not neutrality. uh-huh, but the americans supplied to the first world war until april of the seventeenth year, they were a neutral country. everything is fine. everything is fine the british were supplied in the fortieth year, they were also neutrals until december 6, the forty-first year. this hypocrisy has been going on for how many years and it's not an investment. it's more like, yeah, raising one's here for now. and an attempt to sell a toxic asset to russia it's clear business on blood, you know, there are historical parallels. in this case, they are very reasonable, because even

then they are under onion speeches. even those who called themselves our allies. uh, they intervened and now western countries are constantly talking to us about peace and continue to supply daily a deadly weapon that contributes to the destruction of both the ukrainian people and, er, the destruction of our soldiers, despite the fact that and despite the fact that they declare that this weapon is not enough of it. here. hear what former british ambassador to germany da melnik had to say. the ukrainian army is advancing slowly due to the lack of weapons for the offensive. germany can and should play a key role in the liberation of the occupied territories much faster, where the german battle tanks are. mr. federal president. well, at in this they will never call themselves a party to the conflict, because they are really afraid of a real war. they are well aware that if they declare war on russia, then this war, they will lose 100%, but nevertheless. they want our special operation to continue, so that

ukrainian residents continue to die, because this is just their real business. they do support their military-industrial complex. they write off old equipment and produce new ones. they sell it. this, of course, is not investment. these are real loans and it will take a long time to pay for these loans. the question is who will be the successor and will the kiev regime have the right to have a successor, since what is there to talk about? will the confrontation end if it ceases to stop at the rate of equipment for zelensky, he will not just sit at the negotiating table. he will imprison you in the community of the defendants on the same day, when and their techniques will stop, none of the acting ukrainians will take responsibility for the criminal kiev regime, which happened to the ukrainians inadmissibility. let's hear what he said. if at some point ukraine realized that it could no longer count on weapons and assistance, if the west had promised to provide hundreds of billions of dollars for the restoration of its cities devastated by the war, then zelensky is possible. could agree to sit down at the negotiating table, but who will talk to him then?

that's the question two questions, how long can the us finance ukraine weapons at this rate and is the us a party to the conflict? i am i can answer both questions first, what will happen to ukraine if america stops helping? this is the first question, but naturally, ukraine will lose, because ukraine is three times smaller in terms of population, and the military budget of ukraine is 10 times smaller than that of russia, of course, without western assistance. ukraine will lose. but with e western aid it is a different matter and we will see. and how will it end? i can answer to and how long can the us the west can finance this company? i think it's a long time because yes now there are about 70 congressmen. this is about 15% of the congress, which is dissatisfied and does not want to finance. they are mostly

trumps. they can grow, well, not much after november 8th, anyway, there is a consensus, and the republican party, because there are two types of republicans, there is a trapezoid that is political and isolated. and there is a regen, a reagan uh republican, who fully supports, and there is an american company in ukraine. therefore, ah, and very very very very show alexander how the united states financed an afghan company for 20 years. there on wednesdays 100 billion dollars each year ended up during the great recession, when we had a very bad economic situation. we continued anyway. yes, well, we have such a period of 20 years. why are you enriching the baron. i

benefited from your help yesterday by the people of afghanistan, answering a question. how long can the us fund, judging by the afghan, you're taking 20 years. russia has 20 years, how long? why did they cry to me, but still ate such a term 20 years. yes, i think that in russia, eternity is ahead, but i believe that we will gather here in the spring, we will see what is left of europe, are the people of the united states satisfied with the prices of gasoline and how did this winter go in general, and then, maybe, i will be able to to convince you that we are not 20 years old. and we still have a century ahead, dear friends. still, i would like to return to the story with which we started and somehow immediately moved instantly to ukraine. that is, let's touch on a little history, especially since you have such wonderful photos vladivostok eighteenth nineteenth year, odessa nineteenth year. well, how can you not comment on all this, especially since there were some things in the opening film that you cannot agree with. uh, dear friends, there was no

significant help from the allies of britain and france, uh, the white movement is nothing of the creatures, but they did not absolutely bulgar. he said, you bastard. yes, yes, yes, here we can completely agree with bulgak. and it's better to believe. and it's better to believe. uh, admiral kolchak, about which we do not have here. uh, for a long time they filmed in the film, yes, which, when he turned to the allies for help. eh, he was told the following is reflected in the documents that we are not fighting the bolsheviks. it would be an interference in our internal affairs to help you, as allies, we will provide, but only there is no money for money, the allies said to pay in gold and grain and they did not deliver anything. er, so er, what were they doing here? uh, dear friends, they were really solving their own problems. they took control of territories and resources. now november is october november. and what would not remember october of the eighteenth year. eh, the landing of the british attention in georgia is a loaf, er, in

azerbaijan, baku is taken under control there, the creation of republics there under control, and the corresponding resources are under control. landing in the nineteenth year, landing in odessa, france . uh, algerian moroccans and other exotics. it's wonderfully described. uh, that means, uh, ours, too, by various vertinsky classics, in including his memoirs. so they solved their own problems of pure intervention was the landing of the japanese. they were not allies at all of the russian empires of the japanese and americans, and in vladivostok and further their advance to siberia, therefore, it was then cynical for that time to solve their own problems and there was no participation in serious hostilities on their part and no help from any white guard either was. wait so you want to say that the invasion of the territory of another state. is not intervention is just that. i say

there was no help. there was an intervention, of course there was help from the very first days. january 18 is more of a legend. hugh leach does not know such a character who was an agent of british intelligence, and through him karl yaroshinsky was financed for 100 billion rubles. he sold his shares of shares, he had the largest grain-producing oil metallurgical enterprises, this speculator sold everything. this wolf of soul street. well, someone on paper is the next example of help, what consisted there, a wonderful historian such a natalian heard such a study of her, which brilliantly showed that there was a dog, and not help from the allies in the white guard, sometimes read, judging by read. let's keep expanding in our times. i think this is a very compelling story. again, i will not go into now, because the historical details, but let me remind you that in the

letters themselves, kolchak said that he swore allegiance to the british crown and was then sent to the territory of our state on a specific assignment. he himself did not want to return there, but let's see, i now again do not give personality to personality assessments. kolchak, i am now talking about the fact that god thank you for this separate, but the one who swore allegiance to britain was sent on assignment. well , i finished it is known, just as we are spending, and taxes from the civil war, and the second point is a very important point about, again, the current situation. why is it extremely relevant. it says exactly that this is an investment, that i repeat once again that ukraine is this is due to missing a single lifebuoy and yes, i repeat it is an investment. it can be an investment only in the case of preserving ukrainian statehood and losing to russia precisely from the point of view. uh, a military situation that even american and western analysts consider an absolutely fabulous scenario and the third point

about michael and the statement with afghanistan. michael absolutely incorrect comparison. why yes? i yes? i'll explain why, because when you fight the taliban for 20 years, you can't defeat the taliban, you sponsor the puppet regime with those same billions and actually trillions of dollars, and then ingloriously leave the taliban because the taliban came to afghanistan well, in fact, they seized power in afghanistan let's be frank, the international situation, the international relations system, in general, global politics has not changed much. and here is the situation with ukraine and this military conflict, which in my opinion, and the lord is my

lord, the holy holy church is opening.